Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

1

OER
Benefit Verses Cost

March 3, 2014
Brenda M. Perea

2

When you use OER:
• You feel like a super hero delivering high
quality content at “no cost”
• Why a super hero?
Super Hero by demandaj published
under a CC BY-NC-SA-2.0 license

• Open source material can be
taken, reused, revised, remixed, republished, and reorganized as needed as long as you follow the
creative commons license
• Digital course content is compiled and edited by the
instructor for other instructors
• Content is presented and delivered predominantly in
multimedia friendly formats through the Internet
• Digital OER textbooks, text readings are reduced
and condensed compared to regular textbooks
• Updating is instant and constant on an on-going
basis
• OER Repositories are often “peer reviewed” for
quality

3

Tools To Supply A OER Super Hero
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Digital Public Library of America
Merlot
Connexions
PhET
P2PU
MIT Open Courseware
Cool Toy Pics of the Day by rosefirerising is published under a
Open Stax College
CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license
Open Learning Initiative
http://open4us.org/faq/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
http://open4us.org/resources/cc-by-license-implementation-deep-diveresources/

License Chooser tool:
• http://creativecommons.org/choose/

4

Challenges to Using and Contributing
• Technology—OER is viewed as a new technology and doesn’t have wide
to OER
acceptance as publisher content
• OER Repositories—Are not built on the same platform such as HTML vs.
XML and sharing to an OER Repository requires manual recreating of
content since SCORM uploads are not standard.
• Time—takes an enormous amount of time to find OER, confirm the
creative commons licenses and then adapt the OER for your specific
needs.
• Quality Assessment—OER is voluntary, there is a reluctance to “share”
and the reluctance to “accept other work as equivalent as publisher
created work”

Super Villain by tikigod published
under a CC BY-NC-ND-2.0 license

• College and University Property—who actually “owns” the content
created within a college or university system.
• academic freedom often prevent the acceptance and sharing of
open access licenses
• Following or Creating a different CC BY license for each OER published
• No Central OER repository--Videos: YouTube, Vimeo or the Internet
Archive, Audio/Podcasts: Soundcloud or the Internet Archive.
Presentations: Slideshare, Documents: Google Drive
4

5

Creative Commons Attribution

• OER-Benefit verses Cost Brenda M. Perea is licensed under
a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

More Related Content

OER-Benefit Verses Cost

  • 1. OER Benefit Verses Cost March 3, 2014 Brenda M. Perea
  • 2. When you use OER: • You feel like a super hero delivering high quality content at “no cost” • Why a super hero? Super Hero by demandaj published under a CC BY-NC-SA-2.0 license • Open source material can be taken, reused, revised, remixed, republished, and reorganized as needed as long as you follow the creative commons license • Digital course content is compiled and edited by the instructor for other instructors • Content is presented and delivered predominantly in multimedia friendly formats through the Internet • Digital OER textbooks, text readings are reduced and condensed compared to regular textbooks • Updating is instant and constant on an on-going basis • OER Repositories are often “peer reviewed” for quality
  • 3. Tools To Supply A OER Super Hero • • • • • • • • • • • Digital Public Library of America Merlot Connexions PhET P2PU MIT Open Courseware Cool Toy Pics of the Day by rosefirerising is published under a Open Stax College CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 license Open Learning Initiative http://open4us.org/faq/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://open4us.org/resources/cc-by-license-implementation-deep-diveresources/ License Chooser tool: • http://creativecommons.org/choose/
  • 4. Challenges to Using and Contributing • Technology—OER is viewed as a new technology and doesn’t have wide to OER acceptance as publisher content • OER Repositories—Are not built on the same platform such as HTML vs. XML and sharing to an OER Repository requires manual recreating of content since SCORM uploads are not standard. • Time—takes an enormous amount of time to find OER, confirm the creative commons licenses and then adapt the OER for your specific needs. • Quality Assessment—OER is voluntary, there is a reluctance to “share” and the reluctance to “accept other work as equivalent as publisher created work” Super Villain by tikigod published under a CC BY-NC-ND-2.0 license • College and University Property—who actually “owns” the content created within a college or university system. • academic freedom often prevent the acceptance and sharing of open access licenses • Following or Creating a different CC BY license for each OER published • No Central OER repository--Videos: YouTube, Vimeo or the Internet Archive, Audio/Podcasts: Soundcloud or the Internet Archive. Presentations: Slideshare, Documents: Google Drive 4
  • 5. Creative Commons Attribution • OER-Benefit verses Cost Brenda M. Perea is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Editor's Notes

  1. TechnologyTimeQuality Assessment-Reluctance to “share” and the reluctance to “accept other instructors work”Policies on academic freedom, open access licenses (CC BY)Development of a master course with core competencies coveredEvolving Online/Hybrid Pedagogy QualityDiffering learning management systemsResistance to being required to publish Online/hybrid courses as OEREvolving Online/Hybrid Pedagogy Differing learning management systems