Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
No Blame Analysis of Naplan
Our Data Table Share
• What have you done with your Naplan Data?

• What have you learnt from it?
• Time to share

New Gisborne, Gisborne, Romsey, Kyneton SC
 Mt Macedon
Report Back


• As a group thing that we could take back to
  our schools to try
• Recommendation for others to try
                 (Practical)
• One staff member to be data analysis to use
  Item analysis report – in relationship to the
  results anything under 50% correct was listed
  this list given to staff for supervision. Andy
• NSW competition – large amounts of data
• On Demand data examined to find areas of
  need.
• Year 7 data to Schools to inform Year 6
  teaching focus
• Numeracy Intervention – Exploring
  Mathematical Understanding Program - Kim
• Professional Reading – Booker
• Teachers exploring assessment regularly
• Data analysis – 10% above State average
  Celebrate successes - 10% below further
  investigation of actual errors – find the
  misconceptions and share with staff
• Coding score – discuss strength and weakness
  for each score with teacher
• Investigate cohort growth
  – 0-50point growth
  – 52-100
  – 100+
• PMI for results
• Patrick Griffins -Developing Professional
  Teams
• Examine the language of the questions
  Assumptions of Prior Knowledge.
• Proformas– New Gisborne PS on the Ultranet
• Collective Responsibility – PD Plan &
  Professional Learning.
• Be more explicit in our teaching
• Helping teachers to become more reflective
• You CAN photocopy students writing
Ways to Use Data to Inform
             Instruction
  Writing
  – Phillip Holmes Smith – Coordinators
  – Trish Hyland where to next

• Transition
   – Primary to secondary
Phillip Holmes Smith
www.sreams.com.au
Using Naplan data as an example of to use data
  to inform instruction

1.Writing criteria Report
2. Marking Rubric
3. Response Report
The Writing Criteria Report



                        Choose “Writing
                        Criteria Report”




                        Click on “Preview
                        Report” to view
                        results
The Writing Criteria Report



                                                             School


State




        The report makes little sense without understanding how
         the writing task is marked against the “Writing Marking
                                  Guide”
The Writing Marking Rubric

                     Click here to
                     download the Writing
                     Marking Rubric
The Writing Marking Rubric
Our schools – a closer look




                              Text structure (0 – 4)
                              In this school about 38%
                              received a score of 1 but
                              the majority 59%received
                              2.
                              To improve the teachers
                              need to move the 1s to 2
                              and the 2s to 3!
Text Structures
Skill focus: The organisation of the structural components of a persuasive text (introduction,
body and conclusion) into an appropriate and effective text structure.
• What do we suggest that this teacher or
  teachers do to support these students?
The Student Response Report
     (Writing Test – by criteria)




                                    Choose “Student
                                    Response Report”




                                    Choose “Writing
                                    Test – by criteria”
The Student Response Report (Writing)
Analysing naplan
How can we assist teachers to think about using
 data like this?



• Shoulder to shoulder talk
Transition
         Primary to Secondary
Who owns the data?
19 months of the 24 month cycle is with
  previous teachers
Looking for common misconceptions so that we
  can support students in achieving the best
  that they can
• An approach to sustaining student outcomes
  in the long term



• Supportive and collegiate discussions between
  secondary schools and feeder primary schools
• Data has to be generated by Secondary School



• Breaking year 7 data into primary school
  cohorts can show the strengths and areas to
  work on at the primary level
Item Analysis report



                         Choose item
                         Analysis
                         report


                       Choose class
                       code
Reading using item analysis
What we are looking at
Reading example
Spelling
Grammar and Punctuation
Mathematics
Where to from here?

• Little steps
• Drilling down on results
• Strengths and weakness
• Whole school ownership
Term 4 work

• Guided Reading – workshop modelling and
  inclass support
• Literacy block Grade 1/2 - planning modelling
  inclass support
• Daily 5 and Cafe Menu Prep - planning and
  inclass trial
• Spelling – revisit after whole school workshop
Term 4 work
• Supporting Writers Workshop with Literacy
  Coordinators
• Follow up afterschool workshops (To be
  decided)
• Reading workshop – Grade 5/6 planning and
  inclass support
• Friends and Books – follow up with schools/
  Ultranet
• Naplan analysis and support
Naplan Conversion to VELS
Phillip Holmes Smith
               Expected Growth
2011                                       Reading Writing         Numeracy

                Below Expected Growth
Yr 3 -Yr5                                  <72         <69     <88
                Within Expected Growth
                                           72-93       69-91.3 88-115.5
                Exceeded Expected Growth
                                           >93         >91.3 >115.5

                Below Expected Growth
Yr 5 - Yr 7                                <44.6       <43.1       <52.2
                Within Expected Growth
                                           44.6-55.8   43.1-52.9   52.2-66.9
                Exceeded Expected Growth
                                           >55.8       >52.9       >66.9

                Below Expected Growth
Yr 7 - Yr 9                                <36.7       <39.5       <42.2
                Within Expected Growth
                                           36.7-38.2   39.5-42.3   42.2-44
                Exceeded Expected Growth
                                           >38.2       >42.3       >44

More Related Content

Analysing naplan

  • 1. No Blame Analysis of Naplan
  • 2. Our Data Table Share • What have you done with your Naplan Data? • What have you learnt from it? • Time to share New Gisborne, Gisborne, Romsey, Kyneton SC Mt Macedon
  • 3. Report Back • As a group thing that we could take back to our schools to try • Recommendation for others to try (Practical)
  • 4. • One staff member to be data analysis to use Item analysis report – in relationship to the results anything under 50% correct was listed this list given to staff for supervision. Andy • NSW competition – large amounts of data • On Demand data examined to find areas of need. • Year 7 data to Schools to inform Year 6 teaching focus
  • 5. • Numeracy Intervention – Exploring Mathematical Understanding Program - Kim • Professional Reading – Booker • Teachers exploring assessment regularly • Data analysis – 10% above State average Celebrate successes - 10% below further investigation of actual errors – find the misconceptions and share with staff
  • 6. • Coding score – discuss strength and weakness for each score with teacher • Investigate cohort growth – 0-50point growth – 52-100 – 100+ • PMI for results • Patrick Griffins -Developing Professional Teams
  • 7. • Examine the language of the questions Assumptions of Prior Knowledge. • Proformas– New Gisborne PS on the Ultranet • Collective Responsibility – PD Plan & Professional Learning. • Be more explicit in our teaching • Helping teachers to become more reflective • You CAN photocopy students writing
  • 8. Ways to Use Data to Inform Instruction Writing – Phillip Holmes Smith – Coordinators – Trish Hyland where to next • Transition – Primary to secondary
  • 9. Phillip Holmes Smith www.sreams.com.au Using Naplan data as an example of to use data to inform instruction 1.Writing criteria Report 2. Marking Rubric 3. Response Report
  • 10. The Writing Criteria Report Choose “Writing Criteria Report” Click on “Preview Report” to view results
  • 11. The Writing Criteria Report School State The report makes little sense without understanding how the writing task is marked against the “Writing Marking Guide”
  • 12. The Writing Marking Rubric Click here to download the Writing Marking Rubric
  • 14. Our schools – a closer look Text structure (0 – 4) In this school about 38% received a score of 1 but the majority 59%received 2. To improve the teachers need to move the 1s to 2 and the 2s to 3!
  • 15. Text Structures Skill focus: The organisation of the structural components of a persuasive text (introduction, body and conclusion) into an appropriate and effective text structure.
  • 16. • What do we suggest that this teacher or teachers do to support these students?
  • 17. The Student Response Report (Writing Test – by criteria) Choose “Student Response Report” Choose “Writing Test – by criteria”
  • 18. The Student Response Report (Writing)
  • 20. How can we assist teachers to think about using data like this? • Shoulder to shoulder talk
  • 21. Transition Primary to Secondary Who owns the data? 19 months of the 24 month cycle is with previous teachers Looking for common misconceptions so that we can support students in achieving the best that they can
  • 22. • An approach to sustaining student outcomes in the long term • Supportive and collegiate discussions between secondary schools and feeder primary schools
  • 23. • Data has to be generated by Secondary School • Breaking year 7 data into primary school cohorts can show the strengths and areas to work on at the primary level
  • 24. Item Analysis report Choose item Analysis report Choose class code
  • 25. Reading using item analysis
  • 26. What we are looking at
  • 31. Where to from here? • Little steps • Drilling down on results • Strengths and weakness • Whole school ownership
  • 32. Term 4 work • Guided Reading – workshop modelling and inclass support • Literacy block Grade 1/2 - planning modelling inclass support • Daily 5 and Cafe Menu Prep - planning and inclass trial • Spelling – revisit after whole school workshop
  • 33. Term 4 work • Supporting Writers Workshop with Literacy Coordinators • Follow up afterschool workshops (To be decided) • Reading workshop – Grade 5/6 planning and inclass support • Friends and Books – follow up with schools/ Ultranet • Naplan analysis and support
  • 35. Phillip Holmes Smith Expected Growth 2011 Reading Writing Numeracy Below Expected Growth Yr 3 -Yr5 <72 <69 <88 Within Expected Growth 72-93 69-91.3 88-115.5 Exceeded Expected Growth >93 >91.3 >115.5 Below Expected Growth Yr 5 - Yr 7 <44.6 <43.1 <52.2 Within Expected Growth 44.6-55.8 43.1-52.9 52.2-66.9 Exceeded Expected Growth >55.8 >52.9 >66.9 Below Expected Growth Yr 7 - Yr 9 <36.7 <39.5 <42.2 Within Expected Growth 36.7-38.2 39.5-42.3 42.2-44 Exceeded Expected Growth >38.2 >42.3 >44

Editor's Notes

  1. Use the materials that have been presented by Phillip Holmes Smith as a tool to navigate the process of looking at the data provided in Naplan. How to get into reports and then how to use this Some schools are buying sreams
  2. Using writing as a focus today because topic is supporting writers
  3. Orange is the stateRed is school
  4. It is 70 pages long and hopefully everyone brought theirs.Can use it online or on the computer but each school should have at least one hard copy of the doco
  5. Every genre or text type has a defined criteria for markingNarrative did and here is the one for Persuasive.We expect that students will be expected to write in the persuasive genre for at least 5 years to allow for the picture to be formed of student growth Ideas are linked to the topicCharacters and settings instead of persuasive devises.It would be still good to use the narrative rubric for working with narratives (Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater!!)
  6. Our task is to look at our school, our classes and decide where we can support our students in moving up the rubric.Then look at our kids and see how we can support them.
  7. We can look at what a 1 or a 2 isWe can look at the examples that ACRARA givesWe then can look at what our students are doing and think about what support they need.
  8. The rubric shows what is expected next and gives examples that students could read to get an idea of what writing in paragraphs looks like.
  9. This gives us the details of student results by criteria.We can look at students in a school in a class or even by themselves.
  10. This is the example given by Phillip Holmes Smith and it is based on the narrative assessmentIt is not different to what you can get from the reports this year.For those of you that are buying ‘Sreams’ it is done for you.
  11. Year 7 NAPLAN Persuasive Writing –The writing was assessed in 8 areas. I have created a table to show you what the students (as an average) actually achieved and what they need to learn next.This document could be used to forward plan writing strategies and learning intentions for term one next year.Support taken directly from the marking guide.Could use the information from sources like Northern Territory writing supportThe wiki has lots of information about persuasive writing
  12. We have this material around usDon’t let’s just leave it there
  13. We often talk about what we have to do to improve the kids but what do we do to get our teachers to look at their teachingThe school owns this dataFrom prep upThere will be things we can all do as a school to build strength in teaching
  14. Network plan
  15. Item analysisWe can see cohorts hereCan use classes within schools Looking for patterns
  16. Question 30This cohort School Answer is A – 25% had it correct c/f 59% of the state getting it correct. See the spread of answers across the state results75% of cohort had the same incorrect answerCould lead to believe that misconception – not taught / not understood by most
  17. When you look at student results - the raw score you can get a vels level although as with any conversion it only gives a feeling and not completely accurate.