More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Model answers nationalism
Similar to Model answers nationalism (20)
More from mattbentley34
More from mattbentley34 (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Model answers nationalism
- 1. Edexcel A2 Political Ideologies 5 Nationalism and racialism A Short-answer questions 1 Distinguish between the nation and the state, and explain why the two are often confused. • Nations are cultural entities — groups of people who share the same language, religion, traditions and so on. However, as no nation is culturally homogeneous, nations are ultimately defined by the existence of some form of national consciousness and can thus be thought of as psycho-political constructs. • States are political associations which establish sovereign jurisdiction over defined territorial areas. • The terms are often confused for two reasons: firstly, in the modern world, states and nations often overlap through the existence of nation-states; and secondly, because national consciousness usually entails the desire to achieve or maintain statehood. 2 In what ways is nationalism compatible with liberalism? • Nationalism is compatible with liberalism in a number of ways, as demonstrated by the existence of liberal nationalism. • Liberal nationalism is based upon the transference to the nation of moral and political concerns that liberalism has traditionally associated with the individual. Nations are therefore regarded as moral entities entitled to certain rights, just like individuals. • The liberal concern with individual liberty is therefore embodied in the quest for national self- determination, with all nations being entitled to equal status and basic rights, reflecting the liberal commitment to formal equality. Self-determination, moreover, is taken to imply constitutional rule and political democracy on liberal lines. • The liberal belief in balance and harmony is also reflected in the Wilsonian liberal nationalist idea that a world of sovereign nation-states will be peaceful and stable. 3 How does nationalism differ from racialism? • Nationalism is a sense of common cultural identity, nations being groups of people who share common cultural characteristics, such as language, religion and tradition. Nationalist doctrines have taken a number of forms. Classical or liberal nationalism is based on the principle of national self-determination and the nation-state ideal, but nationalism has also been expressed in a chauvinistic belief in the superiority of one nation over other nations, and in a nation’s right, or destiny, to dominate and control other nations. • Racialism is the belief that humankind is divided into distinct biological groups, each possessing different physical, intellectual and moral characteristics rooted in innate Hodder Education © 2013 1
- 2. physiological or genetic traits. Racialist doctrines assert the need for racial segregation or claims of racial superiority, or both. • The distinction between nationalism and racialism therefore centres on the cultural/biological divide (nations may encompass a number of races), and is also reflected in the tendency of (liberal) nationalism towards international harmony and the tendency of racism towards international conflict. • However, there are clear overlaps between chauvinist nationalism and racialism. B Essay questions 4 ‘Nationalism is inherently expansionist and destructive.’ Discuss. • Nationalism has a range of contrasting sub-strands, some of which are clearly expansionist and destructive, while others are dedicated, at least in theory, to peaceful co-existence and international harmony. • The expansionist and destructive character of nationalism is evident in chauvinist nationalism, which asserts the cultural superiority of one nation over others. Chauvinism both stimulates and seeks to legitimise expansion, conquest and empire, linking it to destruction. • Conservative nationalism may have imperialist aims, or may be defensively aggressive, but is not necessarily so. • However, liberal nationalism and anti-colonial nationalism reject expansionism. Liberal nationalism, for example, holds that all nations are equally entitled to self-determination and implies that a world of sovereign nation-states would be orderly and peaceful as no autonomous nation would have an incentive to conquer and subordinate any other nation. Anti-colonial nationalism seeks independence and sovereignty. • In that sense, nationalism is not inherently expansionist or destructive. • However, any form of nationalism may be destructive — of, for example, life, liberty, equality, peace, unity or individualism. 5 Is nationalism a progressive or a reactionary political doctrine? • ‘Reactionary’ means seeking to turn back the clock to an earlier circumstance — the opposite of ‘progressive’. • Liberal nationalism is forward-looking and seeks progressive cultural and political autonomy. • Conservative nationalism seeks to preserve cultural traditions, but does not seek to go either forwards or backwards — except in the form of neo-conservatism, which is reactionary. • Chauvinist nationalism is reactionary in that it seeks to restore the former glories of lost empires; but it may also perceive itself to be progressive in enhancing the interests of its own cultural group. • Anti-colonial nationalism is progressive in seeking freedom and self-determination; but it is also reactionary in the literal sense of seeking a return to a former state of independence. • Certain forms of nationalism may therefore be both progressive and reactionary — ‘janus-like’. Hodder Education © 2013 2
- 3. 6 To what extent is nationalism a single doctrine? • Nationalism is a single doctrine to the extent that all forms of nationalism treat the cultural group as the supreme principle of political organisation. However, in most other respects nationalism is characterised by significant divisions, making nationalism appear to be a collection of distinct, and in some respects, sharply conflicting sub-strands. • Liberal nationalism is orientated around the goal of self-determination and sovereign independence for all nations, nations being viewed as equal moral entities. This form of nationalism promises to deliver international peace and harmony, and is compatible with cosmopolitanism and, to some extent, supranationalism. • Conservative nationalists, by contrast, stress the organic character of national identity, placing greater stress than do liberals on national unity and cultural cohesion, even legitimising prejudice and perhaps harbouring implicit racism. This form of nationalism is essentially insular and implies that distrust and tension amongst nations is, to some degree, inevitable. • Expansionist forms of nationalism are characterised by chauvinism — the assertion of cultural superiority linked to myths of national greatness and plans for conquest and territorial expansion. This form of nationalism usually embodies militarism and imperialism. • Anti-colonial forms of nationalism, on the other hand, have harnessed the liberal idea of sovereignty to the Marxist revolutionary goal of social revolution. In post-colonial societies, anti-colonial nationalism has often given way to non-Western and anti-Western creeds, sometimes associated with religious fundamentalism. • The differences are profound, but there are some overlaps and similarities, especially between liberal and anti-colonial nationalism, and between conservative and chauvinist nationalism. Hodder Education © 2013 3