The document discusses measures to reduce NO2 levels in Austria. It notes that exceedances of NO2 levels have occurred near roads and highways. The highest levels are found in large cities close to traffic. NO2 comes primarily from diesel vehicles. Projections show NO2 levels from traffic declining slowly by 2020. Measures discussed to reduce NO2 include reducing traffic volume, changing to less polluting vehicles, lowering emission levels from vehicles, and restricting or relocating emissions. Examples given are low emission zones, sectoral bans of trucks, taxes and charges, and speed limits. Both synergies and antagonisms between NO2 reduction and reducing other pollutants are addressed.
1 of 36
More Related Content
Christian Nagl. Environment Agency Austria - (Mesures per a reduir els nivells de NO2 a Europa i Àustria)
3. Current situation – NO2
Exceedances 2008: 21 (16 incl. margin of tolerance) out of 150 sites
Exceedances 2009: 20 (14 incl. MoT) out of 150 sites
Highest levels: 63 g/m³ in 2009 (72 g/m³ in 2008)
Areas concerned:
Large cities – close to traffic (Vienna, Graz, Linz, Salzburg)
Next to highways in alpine valleys (Inn valley, Tauern)
Sources: local up to 90% traffic; lorries 2/3, (diesel)-cars 1/3
3
4. Trends – NO2
decline until
2000
increase close
to traffic
2000–2006
slight decline
2007-2009
4
5. Trend NO2 at selected traffic sites
Problem: primary NO2 of diesel cars
5
9. Types of measures
to reduce (traffic) volume (activity)
to change type of vehicles, installations (emission factors)
to change emission factors of vehicles, installations
to re-allocate emissions either spatially or temporally
to confine emissions
9
10. Reduction of traffic volume
Congestion charge
Parking schemes
Increase of taxes and charges, road pricing
Sectoral ban (Inn valley motorway)
Encouragement of public transport, bicycles, walking, ...
...
Source: wikipedia
Source: LERK
10
11. Type of vehicles, machinery
Source: paultan.org
Stimulating change of vehicle fleet by:
incentives to foster uptake of new EURO
standards, EEVs (e.g. by differentiating
taxes/charges)
incentives for gas, electric, ... vehicles
increase of tax on diesel
Scrappage schemes
Environmental zones, ban of certain
vehicles, machinery
Encourage/require use of electric
machinery instead of gasoline driven
11
12. Reduction of emissions at source
Traffic
Speed limit for passenger cars
Remote sensing to detect high emitting vehicles
Reduction of idling of cars and trucks
Traffic, off-road, stationary
Selective Catalytic Reduction SCR
(retrofitting, e.g. for ships, locomotives, stationary sources)
shore-side electricity for ships
Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) limitations, use of Ground Power Unit
change of fuel (lower N-content)
Residential heating
district heating, new installations, Combined Heat and Power Production
CHP, thermal insulation, ...
12
13. Re-allocation, confinement of
emissions
Bypass roads, tunnels
Night-time ban of HDV (Inntal motorway)
Ban of through-traffic
(Higher stacks)
Noise barriers
13
16. no-regret measures
(in most cases)
Energy savings
Efficiency improvements
Combined heat and power generation
Advanced residential combustion
Reduction in traffic volume
Speed limits for passenger cars
Bans
Shore-side electricity for ships
...
BUT: impact assessment might be needed 16
17. Antagonistic measures
GHG reduction, increase of NOx
Increased use of biomass, some biofuels (when
w/o changeover)
(Increased share of Diesel)*
Carbon capture and storage
PM reduction, increase of NOx
Diesel particle filter (in some cases; esp. increase
of primary NO2) Source:
http://www.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/v33_2_00/research.htm
NOx reduction, increase of GHG
SCR, SNCR might lead to small decrease of
efficiency (not for traffic!)
increased use of natural gas (CH4 )
* thwarted by increased weight, power of diesel vehicles 17
Source: BMW
18. Synergies
In general, synergies with GHG, PM reduction can be
expected
Reduction of costs to achieve environmental targets due to
climate & energy package
IIASA 2007, NEC report #5
costs C&EP
costs TSAP
18
20. Low emission zones
named in 2008/50/EG Annex XV B
Implemented in:
London
Lund, Göteborg, Malmö, Stockholm
40 cities in Germany
several Italian cities
NL, DK
...
20
21. Sectoral ban (AT)
Ban of transport of specific goods by HDV on motorway
(waste, rocks, soil, rubble, timber, cork, cars, steel, tiles)
Piggy-back transport on rail
Implemented May 2008 / January 2009
Reduction of ≈200,000 HDV p.a.
Reduction NO2 levels of 1.5%
Infringement procedure launched
21
source: Federal Province of Tyrol
22. Other measures
Taxes, charges
Congestion charge in Stockholm, London
Source: svd.se
NOx charge for installations in SE, NL, NO
NOx bubble for airports (CH)
Source: svd.se
22
23. Speed limits for passenger cars
motorways in AT, ES, NL, ...
reduction e.g. from 130/120 to 100 or
80km/h
side effects: less noise, GHG,
accidents, injuries source: Air Quality Plans Technical Office. Environment and
Housing Department. Autonomous Government of Catalonia
Rotterdam, Inn valley:
-3 to -5 g/m³ NO2
Enforcement decisive
Inner-city effect (30km/h) small
23
24. NO2 level dependent speed limit (AT)
Reason: political and public acceptance
Reduction v(cars) from 130km/h to 100km/h
Dependent on dispersion conditions, number
and emissions of cars
Same effect of permanent speed limit during
winter, 75% of whole year
High share of diesel cars
high share for NO2 levels
Costs: 2–5 Mio. €, if display necessary
(permanent speed limit more cost effective)
Quelle: Ökoscience 2007
24
25. Retrofitting
SCR retrofitting possible for HDV, buses, off-road
Has to be customized for each application,
in some cases for each bus line
High reduction of NOx (40-90%) possible
Costs:
LDV ≈3,500€
HDV ≈ 10,000€
Retrofitting not feasible for passenger cars
25
27. impact of projects for construction
sites
charge dependent on EURO standards, distance
85 % EURO III (2005–2006)
-75 % HDV km
recycling of waste at site
-35 % HDV trips
27
29. challenges in Austria
Compliance with LVs in 2011 and 2015, time extension NO2
large gap in some areas drastic (traffic) measures necessary
hardly any reduction of NO2 levels (primary NO2 emissions,
diesel-cars, type approval cycle)
quantification of impact of measures
political and public acceptance
exemptions for certain vehicles, installations
fragmentation of responsibility
compliance with NEC
29
30. Summary & conclusions
(diesel) cars are dominant source for NO2 exceedances
No single measure will result in compliance in many areas
In some areas in Europe, even EURO 6/VI will not result in
compliance until 2020
CC measures support AQ, leads to a reduction of costs for
AQ, even though some measures do have an antagonistic
effect. Impact assessment might be necessary
Retrofitting not possible for all types of vehicles
30
31. Contact & Information
Christian Nagl
+43-1-31304-5866, christian.nagl@umweltbundesamt.at
NO2 workshop Brussels 14-15 April 2010:
http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/ambient/library?l=/event
s/workshop_14-15_2010&vm=detailed&sb=Title
Umweltbundesamt NO2 Workshop
www.umweltbundesamt.at Barcelona ■ 17-18 June 2010
31
33. measures of NEC program 2010
traffic
M.1 – increase of tax on fuels
M.2 – increase of road pricing for HDV at highways
M.3 – promoting fuel-efficient driving
M.4 – support for early uptake of EURO 5/6 standards for
passenger cars
M.5 – traffic control systems
M.6 – promoting mobility management
33
34. measures of NEC program 2010
traffic
M.7 – improvements rail freight traffic
M.8 – control of road freight traffic
M.9 – promoting pedestrian and bicycle traffic
M.10 – improvements in ship traffic (Danube river)
M.11 – scrappage scheme
M.12 – road pricing for HDV dependent on EURO standard
M.13 – R&D in the transport sector
34
35. measures of NEC program 2010
stationary sources
S.1 promotion use sulphur free oil
S.2 voluntary agreement with the energy industry
S.3 voluntary agreement with the cement industry
S.4 voluntary agreement with the refinery
S.5 amendment to the combustion regulation
35
36. measures of NEC program 2010
domestic heating
H.1 replacement of solid fuel single stoves
H.2 solar heating and heat pump
H.3 replacement of old heating systems
H.4 improve energy efficiency of buildings
H.5 reinforced advice and control of solid fuel heating systems
H.6 replacement of light fuel oil by higher graded oil
H.7 promoting district heating
H.8 sulphur free light fuel oil
36