Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

The Next Library and the People Who Will Use It

•
•
Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project
Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project

Lee Rainie presented the latest findings from the Pew Research Center's library research and discussed the implications of that research for the future of libraries in three specific ways: The library as a place, the library as a connector of people, and the library as a platform for getting patrons the information and the contacts they seek.

1 of 56
Download to read offline
The Next Library and the People Who Will Use It Lee Rainie Director, Internet, Science, Technology Research Nov. 13 ,2014 AzLA /Mountain Plains Libraries @lrainie | @pewinternet | @pewresearch
The Next Library and the People Who Will Use It
My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
http://bit.ly/1w5YIE7
The big reasons your foundation is solid
1) Libraries are appreciated 91% say libraries are important to their communities 76% say libraries are important to them and their families Robert Dawson photography - Library Road Trip http://www.robertdawson.com/pages/1/Public%20Library%3a%20An%20American%20Commons/Public%20Library%3a%20An%20American%20Commons/
If your local public library CLOSED, would that have a MAJOR impact, MINOR impact or NO IMPACT on … 29 63 38 27 32 7 0 20 40 60 80 100 You and your family Your community as a whole major impact minor impact no impact
Agree / disagree questions
48 69 72 77 33 24 24 19 11 3 2 2 5 2 2 2 3 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 Public libraries provide many services people would have a hard time finding elsewhere. Having a public library improves the quality of life in a community. Because it provides free access to materials and resources, the public library plays an important role in giving everyone a… Public libraries are important because they promote literacy and a love of reading. Strongly agree somewhat agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree don’t know 96% 96% 93% 81%
22 11 31 23 20 28 26 27 1 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 People do NOT need public libraries as much as they used to because they can find most information on their own. Public libraries have NOT done a good job keeping up with new technologies. Strongly agree somewhat agree Somewhat Disagree 34% 53% 55% 46%
12 2) Libraries stack up well vs. others How confident? How important? 63 28 Library to community
3) People like librarians 98% of “ever” library visitors say interactions are “very positive” 81% of library visitors say librarians are “very helpful” 50% of “last year” visitors got help from a librarian
4) Libraries have rebranded themselves as tech hubs 80% of Americans say borrowing books is a “very important” service libraries provide 80% say reference librarians are a “very important” service 77% say free access to computers and the internet is a “very important” service 76% say quiet study spaces are a “very important” service
Warning sign: The Marvin Gaye question •22% say that they know all or most of the services their libraries offer •46% say they know some of what their libraries offer •31% said they know not much or nothing at all of what their libraries offer
My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
Library users % who have visited a library or bookmobile in person in the past 12 months All Americans ages 16+ 48% a Men 45% b Women 50%a Age a 16-17 59%bcd b 18-29 48%e c 30-49 52%de d 50-64 46%e e 65+ 39% Education attainment a No high school diploma 34% b High school grad 39%a c Some College 51%ab d College + 58%abd Parent of minor a Parent 55%b b Non-parent 44% 48% 50% 39% 51% 58% 55%
Who uses library websites % who have ever used a library website in the past 12 months All Americans ages 16+ 30% a Men 26% b Women 34%a Age a 16-17 35%de b 18-29 36%de c 30-49 35%de d 50-64 28%e e 65+ 17% Education attainment a No high school diploma 10% b High school grad 20%a c Some College 34%ab d College + 45%abc Parent of minor a Parent 37%b b Non-parent 27% 30% 34% 17% 34% 45% 37%
http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/03/13/library-engagement-typology/
You can also use this quiz to gather information for your own library or community group. http://bit.ly/1hA8auT
Tier 1: High Engagement 30% of population
Library Lovers – 10% Overview: Strikingly positive views of public libraries; use libraries and library websites more than any other group; believe libraries are essential at the personal & community level. Who they are: Younger, women (62%); highest proportion of parents (40%). High education level, but face economic challenges: 23% have recently lost their jobs or seen a significant loss of income; 25% are currently looking for a job. Students. Liberal and Democratic. Lifestyle: Heavy book readers (66% read a book daily). Generally prefer to borrow books instead of purchasing them; but high share visit bookstores (57%). Enjoy learning, tracking down information. Active socially and engaged with community events, and rate their communities highly. Big tech users. Relationship with libraries: 87% visited the library in the last 12 months, most of them visiting weekly. And 75% say that the local library closed it would have a major impact on them personally, significantly more than any other group. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 22
Information Omnivores – 20% Overview: Heavy info seekers/users. Highest tech use levels. Think libraries have a vital role in their communities. But not nearly as likely to say the loss of the local library would have a major impact on them and their family. Who they are: Highest socio-economic group: 35% live in households earning $75,000+. High employment and education. Women (57%); parents (40%). One of the more urban groups. Politically they are more likely to be Democratic and liberal. Lifestyle: 90% go online every day, and 81% use social media; (46%) have a tablet computer; 68% own a smartphone. Read average of 17 books in the previous 12 months—more likely to buy their books than borrow them. Relationship with libraries: 85% strongly agree that libraries are important because they promote literacy, and 78% strongly agree that libraries improve the quality of life in their communities; 77% say the loss of the library would be a major blow to their community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 23
Tier 2: Medium Engagement 39% of population
Solid Center – 30% Overview: Generally track with the general U.S. population—in demographics; tech use, patronage of libraries, book reading, approach to information, and their views about the importance and role of libraries. Who they are: Tilts a bit male. Median age is 47. Small towns and cities, and half have lived in their communities for longer than 10 years. Less likely than high engagement groups to include parents (28%). Lifestyle: They rank high among the groups in appreciating their communities: 84% would describe their communities as good/excellent. Fairly active in communities. Relationship with libraries: 43% visited the library in the past 12 months; only 5% used a library website in the past year. They rate libraries highly as community resources: 67% say that libraries improve the quality of life in a community and 61% say their library’s closing would have a major impact on their community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 25
Print Traditionalists – 9% Overview: Tend to value the traditional services libraries perform. They are also in one of the higher ranking groups in expressing appreciation for the role of libraries in communities. Live farther from libraries. Who they are: Highest proportions of rural (61%), white (75%), and Southern (50%) respondents. 57% women. About half ended their education with a high school diploma. Political views lean conservative. Lifestyle: Lived long in their communities; know the names of neighbors; they also tend to have positive feelings about where they live; 81% say they socialize with friends or family every day or almost every day. Use technology less than other higher engagement groups. Relationship with libraries: Stand out in their positive views about the role of libraries in communities. Say that if the local library closed it would have a major impact on the community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 26
Tier 3: Low Engagement 18% of population
Not for Me - 4% Overview: Most used public libraries at some point in their lives, though few have done so recently. Their portrait suggests a level of alienation and they have strikingly less positive about role of libraries in communities. Know little of libraries. Who they are: Tilts male (56%); members are more likely to have lower levels of educational attainment; less likely to be married (41%), and are a little less likely to be parents (26%). Just 39% are employed full-time, and almost a quarter (23%) are retired. Lifestyle: 31% read did not read any books last year; lower levels of tech adoption. More likely than others to report having difficulty getting info about such things as politics and current events, community activities, health information, and career opportunities. Relationship with libraries: Relative to other groups, they are more likely to say they find libraries hard to navigate; 64% say library closings would have no impact on them or their family, and just 20% strongly agree that having a public library improves the quality of life in a community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 28
Young and Restless – 7% Overview: Most are relatively new to their communities. This may be why only 15% of its members say they even know where the local library is. Only a third have a library card or visited a library in the past year. However, they have positive views of libraries overall. Who they are: Median age is 33. Highly urban. Many live in lower- income households; large share are students, or are looking for jobs. Much more racially diverse group. Tilt liberal. Lifestyle: Heavily involved with technology; 82% access internet with mobile device. When it comes to reading, they are fairly average: read an average of 11 books in the past 12 months, and a median of 5. Relationship with libraries: Their use of libraries declined in past 5 years, but they their views about the importance of libraries are generally positive: 71% agree that libraries promote literacy, and 61% agree libraries improve the quality of life in a community. 29
Rooted and Roadblocked – 7% Overview: They are longtime residents of their communities, but may face many potential hurdles in their lives: 35% are retired, 27% are living with a disability, and 34% have experienced a major illness (either their own or loved one) within the past year. Still, most likely to say that the closing of the local library would have a major impact on the community (61% say that). Who they are: Median age 58. Most retirees. Whites. Somewhat poorer. Lifestyle: Longtime residents of their communities, but less engaged with certain community life. Lower tech-used levels. Relationship with libraries: This group stands apart from the Not for Me group in its relatively positive views about the role of libraries in communities: 78% agree that libraries are important because they promote literacy and reading; 75% say libraries improve the quality of life in a community; and 72% say libraries give everyone a chance to succeed. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 30
No personal library use: 14% of population
Distant Admirers – 10% Overview: Many say others in their house use libraries, and quite a few indicate that they indirectly rely on various library services. They have very high opinions about importance and role of libraries in communities. Who they are: Largest share of Hispanics (27%); 56% are male. Relatively lower levels of education and household income. Lifestyle: Less likely than some of the other groups to know many neighbors; lower levels in community cultural events. Lower tech adoption. Few are heavy book readers or news consumers. 40% report someone else in HH is library user. Relationship with libraries: 68% say libraries are important because they promote literacy and reading; 66% say public libraries play an important role in giving everyone a chance to succeed; 64% say libraries improve the quality of life in a community. 55% say the loss of the local library would be a blow to the community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 32
Off the Grid – 4% Overview: Disconnected in many ways—not only from libraries, but also from their neighbors/communities, from technology, and from information sources. Many do not regularly read books or stay current with the news. Lowest tech profile. Who they are: High proportions of men (57%), older respondents (the median age 52), and Hispanic respondents (19%), and many tend to live in lower-income households and have lower levels of education. Small towns / rural. Lifestyle: Longtime residents of their communities, but 38% say they don’t know the names of anyone who lives close by. Lowe community engagement. Half read no books in the previous 12 months. Relationship with libraries: They have the least positive views about libraries. Only 45% strongly agree that public libraries play an important role in giving everyone a chance to succeed by providing access to materials and resources vs. 72% of the general population. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 33
What they want you to do
82% 85% 14% 11% 3% 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do Coordinate more closely with local schools in providing resources to kids Offer free early literacy programs to help young children prepare for school
53% 59% 61% 30% 28% 27% 5% 9% 9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do More comfortable spaces for reading, working, relaxing Offer a broader selection of e-books Separate spaces for different services
41% 42% 43% 47% 36% 34% 39% 38% 20% 19% 14% 12% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do Offer more interactive learning experiences similar to museums Help users digitize material such as family photos / historical documents Move most library services online so users can access them without having to visit library Make most services automated, so people can find what they need and check out material on their own without help from staff
18-29 yr olds, smartphone owners, know less about libraries, whites 20% 39% 36% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do Move some print books and stacks out of public locations to free up more space for things such as tech centers, reading rooms, meetings rooms, and cultural events Less active library users, men, Af-Amer, Latinos, teens, less education, lower income HH, no computer Internet users, more active / knowledgeable patrons, whites, those over 50, higher income HH, full time workers, parents of tweens, computer owners, heavier book readers (including e-book readers)
My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
First: Internet – 1995-2014 http://bit.ly/1dE8jFV
First: Broadband – 2000-2013 3% 70% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% June 2000 April 2001 March 2002 March 2003 April 2004 March 2005 March 2006 March 2007 April 2008 April 2009 May 2010 Aug 2011 April 2012 May 2013 Dial-up Broadband http://bit.ly/N8OznH
Second: Mobile connectivity – Cell phones 11/13/2014 http://bit.ly/1dE8jFV 42
Second: Mobile connectivity - Smartphones 11/13/2014 43 http://bit.ly/1dE8jFV
Second: Mobile connectivity – Tablets 11/13/2014 http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/16/e-reading-rises-as-device-ownership-jumps/ 44 32% 42% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 2010 2011 2012 2013 Tablet owners E-reader owners Have either one
Third: Social networking/media - 61% of all adults % of internet users 9% 89% 7% 78% 6% 60% 1% 43% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+
Pervasively generated Pervasively consumed Personal via new filters Participatory / spreadable Replicable Linked Linked Continually edited Real-time / just-in-time Timeless / searchable Here (location) / nowhere Given meaning via networks and algorithms and analytics Impact on networked individuals Information is networked “third skin”
The Internet will become ‘like electricity’ — less visible, yet more deeply embedded in people’s lives for good and ill
It‘s the next revolution. Upsides: enhanced health, convenience, productivity, safety, and vastly more useful information. Downsides: privacy challenges, over-hyped expectations, tech complexity, lagging human adaptation to new realities. The Internet of Things Will Thrive by 2025
Reading is alive and well 81% of those ages 16 and older read a book in the previous year, including 28% who read an e-book 13 is the mean/average number of books read in past 12 months and median/midpoint is 5 24 is mean/average for e-book readers 30% of e-content consumers are reading more now because e- content is available on new devices -- 41% for tablet owners 8% of those 16+ have borrowed an e-book from a library – and they are book buyers, too!
My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
Examples of market and cultural shortcomings librarians could address (and are addressing) 1)Technology non-users - skills training in new literacies 2)Pre-school programs 3)After school activities 4)English as a second language courses 5)Lifelong learning opportunities / credentialing for mastery of competencies 6)Fill gaps in local media ecosystem – community and civic information/curation 7)Help for small business / entrepreneurs / non- profits 8)Agents of serendipitous discovery
My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
People: Serve and Learn Tech experts Master teachers in age of lifelong learning Visionaries for the knowledge economy and the jobs it produces Experts in sense-making and context Curators of the most relevant and useful material Monitors of algorithms Modelers of lifelong learning and value upgrading
Place: Reconfigured and Repurposed Physical space is different and sensored / metered Artifacts are connected and data-rich artifacts Nodes for “system of systems” with databases and media Test beds – maker masters Community information and media stewards – server farms
Platform: Community Resource Trusted institution and privacy watchdog Advocates for free and open Advocates for closing digital divides Data and collections repositories Entrepreneur enablers Civic specialists and gap fillers – especially in learning realms Credentialing???
Be not afraid

More Related Content

The Next Library and the People Who Will Use It

  • 1. The Next Library and the People Who Will Use It Lee Rainie Director, Internet, Science, Technology Research Nov. 13 ,2014 AzLA /Mountain Plains Libraries @lrainie | @pewinternet | @pewresearch
  • 3. My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
  • 4. My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
  • 6. The big reasons your foundation is solid
  • 7. 1) Libraries are appreciated 91% say libraries are important to their communities 76% say libraries are important to them and their families Robert Dawson photography - Library Road Trip http://www.robertdawson.com/pages/1/Public%20Library%3a%20An%20American%20Commons/Public%20Library%3a%20An%20American%20Commons/
  • 8. If your local public library CLOSED, would that have a MAJOR impact, MINOR impact or NO IMPACT on … 29 63 38 27 32 7 0 20 40 60 80 100 You and your family Your community as a whole major impact minor impact no impact
  • 9. Agree / disagree questions
  • 10. 48 69 72 77 33 24 24 19 11 3 2 2 5 2 2 2 3 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 Public libraries provide many services people would have a hard time finding elsewhere. Having a public library improves the quality of life in a community. Because it provides free access to materials and resources, the public library plays an important role in giving everyone a… Public libraries are important because they promote literacy and a love of reading. Strongly agree somewhat agree Somewhat Disagree Strongly Disagree don’t know 96% 96% 93% 81%
  • 11. 22 11 31 23 20 28 26 27 1 10 0 20 40 60 80 100 People do NOT need public libraries as much as they used to because they can find most information on their own. Public libraries have NOT done a good job keeping up with new technologies. Strongly agree somewhat agree Somewhat Disagree 34% 53% 55% 46%
  • 12. 12 2) Libraries stack up well vs. others How confident? How important? 63 28 Library to community
  • 13. 3) People like librarians 98% of “ever” library visitors say interactions are “very positive” 81% of library visitors say librarians are “very helpful” 50% of “last year” visitors got help from a librarian
  • 14. 4) Libraries have rebranded themselves as tech hubs 80% of Americans say borrowing books is a “very important” service libraries provide 80% say reference librarians are a “very important” service 77% say free access to computers and the internet is a “very important” service 76% say quiet study spaces are a “very important” service
  • 15. Warning sign: The Marvin Gaye question •22% say that they know all or most of the services their libraries offer •46% say they know some of what their libraries offer •31% said they know not much or nothing at all of what their libraries offer
  • 16. My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
  • 17. Library users % who have visited a library or bookmobile in person in the past 12 months All Americans ages 16+ 48% a Men 45% b Women 50%a Age a 16-17 59%bcd b 18-29 48%e c 30-49 52%de d 50-64 46%e e 65+ 39% Education attainment a No high school diploma 34% b High school grad 39%a c Some College 51%ab d College + 58%abd Parent of minor a Parent 55%b b Non-parent 44% 48% 50% 39% 51% 58% 55%
  • 18. Who uses library websites % who have ever used a library website in the past 12 months All Americans ages 16+ 30% a Men 26% b Women 34%a Age a 16-17 35%de b 18-29 36%de c 30-49 35%de d 50-64 28%e e 65+ 17% Education attainment a No high school diploma 10% b High school grad 20%a c Some College 34%ab d College + 45%abc Parent of minor a Parent 37%b b Non-parent 27% 30% 34% 17% 34% 45% 37%
  • 20. You can also use this quiz to gather information for your own library or community group. http://bit.ly/1hA8auT
  • 21. Tier 1: High Engagement 30% of population
  • 22. Library Lovers – 10% Overview: Strikingly positive views of public libraries; use libraries and library websites more than any other group; believe libraries are essential at the personal & community level. Who they are: Younger, women (62%); highest proportion of parents (40%). High education level, but face economic challenges: 23% have recently lost their jobs or seen a significant loss of income; 25% are currently looking for a job. Students. Liberal and Democratic. Lifestyle: Heavy book readers (66% read a book daily). Generally prefer to borrow books instead of purchasing them; but high share visit bookstores (57%). Enjoy learning, tracking down information. Active socially and engaged with community events, and rate their communities highly. Big tech users. Relationship with libraries: 87% visited the library in the last 12 months, most of them visiting weekly. And 75% say that the local library closed it would have a major impact on them personally, significantly more than any other group. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 22
  • 23. Information Omnivores – 20% Overview: Heavy info seekers/users. Highest tech use levels. Think libraries have a vital role in their communities. But not nearly as likely to say the loss of the local library would have a major impact on them and their family. Who they are: Highest socio-economic group: 35% live in households earning $75,000+. High employment and education. Women (57%); parents (40%). One of the more urban groups. Politically they are more likely to be Democratic and liberal. Lifestyle: 90% go online every day, and 81% use social media; (46%) have a tablet computer; 68% own a smartphone. Read average of 17 books in the previous 12 months—more likely to buy their books than borrow them. Relationship with libraries: 85% strongly agree that libraries are important because they promote literacy, and 78% strongly agree that libraries improve the quality of life in their communities; 77% say the loss of the library would be a major blow to their community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 23
  • 24. Tier 2: Medium Engagement 39% of population
  • 25. Solid Center – 30% Overview: Generally track with the general U.S. population—in demographics; tech use, patronage of libraries, book reading, approach to information, and their views about the importance and role of libraries. Who they are: Tilts a bit male. Median age is 47. Small towns and cities, and half have lived in their communities for longer than 10 years. Less likely than high engagement groups to include parents (28%). Lifestyle: They rank high among the groups in appreciating their communities: 84% would describe their communities as good/excellent. Fairly active in communities. Relationship with libraries: 43% visited the library in the past 12 months; only 5% used a library website in the past year. They rate libraries highly as community resources: 67% say that libraries improve the quality of life in a community and 61% say their library’s closing would have a major impact on their community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 25
  • 26. Print Traditionalists – 9% Overview: Tend to value the traditional services libraries perform. They are also in one of the higher ranking groups in expressing appreciation for the role of libraries in communities. Live farther from libraries. Who they are: Highest proportions of rural (61%), white (75%), and Southern (50%) respondents. 57% women. About half ended their education with a high school diploma. Political views lean conservative. Lifestyle: Lived long in their communities; know the names of neighbors; they also tend to have positive feelings about where they live; 81% say they socialize with friends or family every day or almost every day. Use technology less than other higher engagement groups. Relationship with libraries: Stand out in their positive views about the role of libraries in communities. Say that if the local library closed it would have a major impact on the community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 26
  • 27. Tier 3: Low Engagement 18% of population
  • 28. Not for Me - 4% Overview: Most used public libraries at some point in their lives, though few have done so recently. Their portrait suggests a level of alienation and they have strikingly less positive about role of libraries in communities. Know little of libraries. Who they are: Tilts male (56%); members are more likely to have lower levels of educational attainment; less likely to be married (41%), and are a little less likely to be parents (26%). Just 39% are employed full-time, and almost a quarter (23%) are retired. Lifestyle: 31% read did not read any books last year; lower levels of tech adoption. More likely than others to report having difficulty getting info about such things as politics and current events, community activities, health information, and career opportunities. Relationship with libraries: Relative to other groups, they are more likely to say they find libraries hard to navigate; 64% say library closings would have no impact on them or their family, and just 20% strongly agree that having a public library improves the quality of life in a community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 28
  • 29. Young and Restless – 7% Overview: Most are relatively new to their communities. This may be why only 15% of its members say they even know where the local library is. Only a third have a library card or visited a library in the past year. However, they have positive views of libraries overall. Who they are: Median age is 33. Highly urban. Many live in lower- income households; large share are students, or are looking for jobs. Much more racially diverse group. Tilt liberal. Lifestyle: Heavily involved with technology; 82% access internet with mobile device. When it comes to reading, they are fairly average: read an average of 11 books in the past 12 months, and a median of 5. Relationship with libraries: Their use of libraries declined in past 5 years, but they their views about the importance of libraries are generally positive: 71% agree that libraries promote literacy, and 61% agree libraries improve the quality of life in a community. 29
  • 30. Rooted and Roadblocked – 7% Overview: They are longtime residents of their communities, but may face many potential hurdles in their lives: 35% are retired, 27% are living with a disability, and 34% have experienced a major illness (either their own or loved one) within the past year. Still, most likely to say that the closing of the local library would have a major impact on the community (61% say that). Who they are: Median age 58. Most retirees. Whites. Somewhat poorer. Lifestyle: Longtime residents of their communities, but less engaged with certain community life. Lower tech-used levels. Relationship with libraries: This group stands apart from the Not for Me group in its relatively positive views about the role of libraries in communities: 78% agree that libraries are important because they promote literacy and reading; 75% say libraries improve the quality of life in a community; and 72% say libraries give everyone a chance to succeed. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 30
  • 31. No personal library use: 14% of population
  • 32. Distant Admirers – 10% Overview: Many say others in their house use libraries, and quite a few indicate that they indirectly rely on various library services. They have very high opinions about importance and role of libraries in communities. Who they are: Largest share of Hispanics (27%); 56% are male. Relatively lower levels of education and household income. Lifestyle: Less likely than some of the other groups to know many neighbors; lower levels in community cultural events. Lower tech adoption. Few are heavy book readers or news consumers. 40% report someone else in HH is library user. Relationship with libraries: 68% say libraries are important because they promote literacy and reading; 66% say public libraries play an important role in giving everyone a chance to succeed; 64% say libraries improve the quality of life in a community. 55% say the loss of the local library would be a blow to the community. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 32
  • 33. Off the Grid – 4% Overview: Disconnected in many ways—not only from libraries, but also from their neighbors/communities, from technology, and from information sources. Many do not regularly read books or stay current with the news. Lowest tech profile. Who they are: High proportions of men (57%), older respondents (the median age 52), and Hispanic respondents (19%), and many tend to live in lower-income households and have lower levels of education. Small towns / rural. Lifestyle: Longtime residents of their communities, but 38% say they don’t know the names of anyone who lives close by. Lowe community engagement. Half read no books in the previous 12 months. Relationship with libraries: They have the least positive views about libraries. Only 45% strongly agree that public libraries play an important role in giving everyone a chance to succeed by providing access to materials and resources vs. 72% of the general population. November 13, 2014 www.pewresearch.org 33
  • 34. What they want you to do
  • 35. 82% 85% 14% 11% 3% 2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do Coordinate more closely with local schools in providing resources to kids Offer free early literacy programs to help young children prepare for school
  • 36. 53% 59% 61% 30% 28% 27% 5% 9% 9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do More comfortable spaces for reading, working, relaxing Offer a broader selection of e-books Separate spaces for different services
  • 37. 41% 42% 43% 47% 36% 34% 39% 38% 20% 19% 14% 12% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do Offer more interactive learning experiences similar to museums Help users digitize material such as family photos / historical documents Move most library services online so users can access them without having to visit library Make most services automated, so people can find what they need and check out material on their own without help from staff
  • 38. 18-29 yr olds, smartphone owners, know less about libraries, whites 20% 39% 36% Should definitely do Should maybe do Should definitely not do Move some print books and stacks out of public locations to free up more space for things such as tech centers, reading rooms, meetings rooms, and cultural events Less active library users, men, Af-Amer, Latinos, teens, less education, lower income HH, no computer Internet users, more active / knowledgeable patrons, whites, those over 50, higher income HH, full time workers, parents of tweens, computer owners, heavier book readers (including e-book readers)
  • 39. My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
  • 40. First: Internet – 1995-2014 http://bit.ly/1dE8jFV
  • 41. First: Broadband – 2000-2013 3% 70% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% June 2000 April 2001 March 2002 March 2003 April 2004 March 2005 March 2006 March 2007 April 2008 April 2009 May 2010 Aug 2011 April 2012 May 2013 Dial-up Broadband http://bit.ly/N8OznH
  • 42. Second: Mobile connectivity – Cell phones 11/13/2014 http://bit.ly/1dE8jFV 42
  • 43. Second: Mobile connectivity - Smartphones 11/13/2014 43 http://bit.ly/1dE8jFV
  • 44. Second: Mobile connectivity – Tablets 11/13/2014 http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/01/16/e-reading-rises-as-device-ownership-jumps/ 44 32% 42% 50% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 2010 2011 2012 2013 Tablet owners E-reader owners Have either one
  • 45. Third: Social networking/media - 61% of all adults % of internet users 9% 89% 7% 78% 6% 60% 1% 43% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 18-29 30-49 50-64 65+
  • 46. Pervasively generated Pervasively consumed Personal via new filters Participatory / spreadable Replicable Linked Linked Continually edited Real-time / just-in-time Timeless / searchable Here (location) / nowhere Given meaning via networks and algorithms and analytics Impact on networked individuals Information is networked “third skin”
  • 47. The Internet will become ‘like electricity’ — less visible, yet more deeply embedded in people’s lives for good and ill
  • 48. It‘s the next revolution. Upsides: enhanced health, convenience, productivity, safety, and vastly more useful information. Downsides: privacy challenges, over-hyped expectations, tech complexity, lagging human adaptation to new realities. The Internet of Things Will Thrive by 2025
  • 49. Reading is alive and well 81% of those ages 16 and older read a book in the previous year, including 28% who read an e-book 13 is the mean/average number of books read in past 12 months and median/midpoint is 5 24 is mean/average for e-book readers 30% of e-content consumers are reading more now because e- content is available on new devices -- 41% for tablet owners 8% of those 16+ have borrowed an e-book from a library – and they are book buyers, too!
  • 50. My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
  • 51. Examples of market and cultural shortcomings librarians could address (and are addressing) 1)Technology non-users - skills training in new literacies 2)Pre-school programs 3)After school activities 4)English as a second language courses 5)Lifelong learning opportunities / credentialing for mastery of competencies 6)Fill gaps in local media ecosystem – community and civic information/curation 7)Help for small business / entrepreneurs / non- profits 8)Agents of serendipitous discovery
  • 52. My points: The New Library is built around 5 insights 1.Where libraries currently stand in the public eye 2.Who patrons are and what they want 3.How technology is changing flows of information 4.Where new needs are surfacing in communities 5.How the concept of the “library” can change to meet new realities
  • 53. People: Serve and Learn Tech experts Master teachers in age of lifelong learning Visionaries for the knowledge economy and the jobs it produces Experts in sense-making and context Curators of the most relevant and useful material Monitors of algorithms Modelers of lifelong learning and value upgrading
  • 54. Place: Reconfigured and Repurposed Physical space is different and sensored / metered Artifacts are connected and data-rich artifacts Nodes for “system of systems” with databases and media Test beds – maker masters Community information and media stewards – server farms
  • 55. Platform: Community Resource Trusted institution and privacy watchdog Advocates for free and open Advocates for closing digital divides Data and collections repositories Entrepreneur enablers Civic specialists and gap fillers – especially in learning realms Credentialing???