Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Syngas 
to 
Power 
Advanced 
Gasifica5on, 
Gas 
Cleaning 
and 
Product 
Gas 
u5liza5on 
Alkmaar, 
The 
Netherlands 
October 
2nd 
2014 
Presented 
by: 
Mar5n 
van 
‘t 
Hoff 
Biomass 
Gasifica5on 
Europe 
2014
Presenta5on 
contents 
• Co-­‐opera5on 
Royal 
Dahlman 
-­‐ 
ECN 
• MILENA 
gasifica5on 
• OLGA 
product 
gas 
cleaning 
• Electricity 
via 
gas 
engines 
and 
gas 
turbines 
• Waste 
to 
Energy 
project 
• Gaseous 
and 
liquid 
fuels 
• Research 
opportuni5es 
at 
Investa
ECN 
& 
Royal 
Dahlman 
• Applied 
R&D; 
Transfer 
from 
fundamental 
research 
to 
a 
system 
which 
is 
ready 
for 
the 
market 
• Scien5sts, 
lab 
& 
pilot 
facili5es 
• Process 
modelling 
• Measurements 
and 
analysis 
• Patent 
holder 
of 
MILENA 
& 
OLGA 
technology 
• Coopera5on 
with 
Royal 
Dahlman 
on 
biomass 
and 
waste 
gasifica5on 
since 
2001 
• Engineering 
and 
produc5on 
of 
technology 
based 
equipment 
• Commercial 
system 
design 
• Technology 
delivery 
to 
the 
market 
• License 
holder 
of 
MILENA 
and 
OLGA 
technology 
• OLGA 
commercial 
demonstrated 
• MILENA 
is 
launched 
on 
the 
market 
based 
on 
ECN 
license 
and 
Royal 
Dahlman 
marke5ng 
& 
engineering
Biomass 
vs. 
Coal 
gasifica5on 
Syngas 
vs. 
product 
gas, 
reason 
for 
confusion! 
• Highly 
reac5ve 
fuels 
such 
as 
coal 
or 
tar-­‐oil 
are 
gasified 
with 
oxygen 
at 
temperatures 
above 
1200 
°C 
and 
produce 
a 
‘syngas’ 
CO 
– 
H2 
and 
CO2 
– 
H2O. 
• Biomass 
or 
waste 
gasifica5on 
has 
a 
reac5on 
temperature 
of 
700 
-­‐ 
950 
°C 
and 
produce 
a 
‘product 
gas’ 
(syngas 
+ 
hydrocarbons) 
CO 
– 
H2 
– 
CH4 
– 
C2H6 
– 
tars 
and 
CO2 
– 
H2O.
Biomass 
vs. 
Coal 
gasifica5on 
(2) 
• Coal 
gasifiers 
have 
a 
very 
large 
scale 
of 
economy 
• Coal 
(entrained 
flow) 
gasifiers 
need 
fine 
powders 
or 
slurries, 
they 
are 
not 
suitable 
for 
biomass 
or 
waste 
(chips, 
fluff) 
• We 
aim 
for 
high 
efficiencies 
on 
a 
scale 
of 
5 
to 
50 
MWe 
• Our 
fuel: 
wood, 
waste 
& 
agricultural 
residues 
Examples 
(L 
to 
R): 
Waste 
wood 
Soya 
Stalk 
RDF 
from 
MSW
The 
MILENA 
gasifier 
MILENA 
an 
indirect 
gasifier 
• Both 
reactors 
in 
one 
refractory 
lined 
reactor 
vessel 
• 100% 
carbon 
to 
gas 
ra5o 
o Resul5ng 
in 
carbon 
free 
ash, 
less 
waste, 
cleaner 
waste 
& 
safer 
waste 
o Resul5ng 
in 
a 
higher 
cold 
gas 
efficiency 
(5 
to 
15% 
higher 
on 
LHV 
basis) 
• Separate 
flue 
gas 
exhaust, 
no 
or 
minimized 
nitrogen 
dilu5on 
of 
the 
product 
gas 
o Compared 
to 
air 
blown 
gasifica5on 
a 
3 
to 
4 
5mes 
higher 
hea5ng 
value. 
o Compared 
to 
oxygen/steam 
blown 
gasifica5on 
a 
much 
higher 
efficiency 
(no 
ASU 
parasi5c), 
while 
s5ll 
having 
60% 
more 
hea5ng 
value 
o Very 
suitable 
for 
cataly5c 
upgrading 
& 
gas 
turbines
MILENA 
gasifica5on 
scope
Gasifica5on 
product 
gas 
cleaning 
Simplified… 
• Solid 
par5culates 
• Organic 
impuri5es 
(tars, 
dioxins) 
mainly 
dependant 
upon 
gasifier 
type 
and 
opera5onal 
characteris5cs 
• Inorganic 
impuri5es 
(H2S, 
HCl, 
NH3 
etc.) 
mainly 
dependant 
upon 
feedstock 
composi5on 
• Other 
impuri5es 
(heavy 
metals, 
HCN, 
COS 
etc.) 
mainly 
dependant 
upon 
feedstock 
composi5on 
• A 
dirty 
feedstock 
(waste) 
is 
alrac5ve, 
but 
results 
in 
more 
cleaning 
efforts
The 
tar 
problem 
1. 
Heavy 
tars 
• 
Condensa5on 
leads 
to 
fouling 
< 
400 
-­‐ 
450°C 
• 
Tar 
dew 
point 
is 
cri5cal 
parameter 
Deactivation of catalyst 
(SNG production) 
Fouling of equipment 
(gas cleaning) 
Plugging of an intercooler 
(gas engines/turbines)
The 
tar 
problem 
2. 
Light 
tars 
• Heterocyclic 
compounds 
(phenol) 
are 
water 
soluble, 
condensate 
& 
scrubber 
water 
is 
poisoned 
• Naphthalene 
can 
cause 
crystalliza5on 
problems 
Phenol Naphthalene
Naphthalene 
crystals 
on 
gas 
engine 
control 
valve 
The 
tar 
problem
OLGA 
Tar 
removal 
Portugal: 
CFB 
gasifier, 
OLGA 
gas 
cleaning, 
Caterpillar 
3516A+ 
gas 
engine 
OLGA, 
a 
tar/oil 
based 
gas 
scrubber 
• OLGA 
captures 
tars 
with 
high 
efficiencies, 
well 
within 
specifica5on 
for 
gas 
engines, 
gas 
turbines 
and 
cataly5c 
processes 
(SNG, 
FT-­‐diesel). 
• OLGA 
does 
not 
convert 
the 
tars 
by 
using 
electricity 
or 
combus5ng 
part 
of 
the 
product 
gas. 
OLGA 
captures 
tars 
and 
recycles 
these 
as 
fuel 
to 
the 
gasifier. 
• OLGA 
has 
low 
pressure 
drop 
and 
only 
consumes 
some 
electricity 
for 
pumps 
and 
tracing 
< 
0,1 
MW 
for 
a 
10 
MW 
gross 
electric 
plant 
(1%). 
• OLGA 
does 
not 
change 
the 
main 
gas 
composi5on, 
high 
energy 
carriers 
like 
methane, 
ethene 
and 
the 
bulk 
of 
the 
benzene 
and 
toluene 
stay 
in 
the 
product 
gas. 
• OLGA 
is 
able 
to 
handle 
very 
high 
tar 
loads, 
up 
to 
50 
g/Nm3 
allowing 
us 
to 
op5mize 
the 
MILENA.
OLGA 
& 
dew 
points 
Temperature 
°C 
Dew 
points 
& 
process 
choices 
T 
= 
850°C 
Cooler 
Particle 
separation 
Water 
dew 
point 
± 
75˚C 
Actual 
temperature 
450 
– 
500°C 
Tar 
dew 
point 
400-­‐450˚C
Dew 
points 
are 
important! 
Condensation 
Temperature 
°C 
Dew 
points 
& 
process 
choices 
Tar 
dew 
point 
400-­‐450˚C 
Water 
dew 
point 
± 
75˚C 
Tar 
dew 
point 
< 
10˚C) 
Absorption 
Cooler 
OLGA 
Separation of: 
tars & fine particles 
Particle 
separation 
T 
= 
850°C 
Actual 
temperature
Dew 
points 
are 
important! 
Condensation 
Temperature 
°C 
Dew 
points 
& 
process 
choices 
Tar 
dew 
point 
400-­‐450˚C 
Water 
dew 
point 
± 
75˚C 
Do 
not 
mix 
tar 
& 
water! 
Tar 
dew 
point 
< 
10˚C 
Absorption 
Cooler 
OLGA 
Separation of: 
tars & fine particles 
Particle 
separation 
T 
= 
850°C 
Actual 
temperature 
Water Quench, 
condenser & scrubber 
(inorganics) 
WDP 
30ºC 
Actual 
temperature
PFD 
-­‐ 
OLGA 
with 
cyclone 
OLGA; 
a 
waste 
free 
system!
OLGA 
Performance, 
gas 
analysis 
Component 
(values 
in 
mg/Nm3) 
Raw 
Gas 
AWer 
OLGA 
Efficiency 
Benzene 
(not 
a 
tar 
component) 
644 
428 
34% 
Toluene 
439 
101 
77% 
Ethylbenzene 
8 
1 
87% 
m/p-­‐Xylene 
68 
2 
97% 
o-­‐Xylene+Styrene 
551 
4 
99% 
Phenol 
597 
-­‐ 
100% 
Indeen+o-­‐cresol 
864 
4 
100% 
m/p-­‐Cresol 
36 
-­‐ 
100% 
Naphthalene 
2.822 
2 
100% 
Quinoline 
14 
-­‐ 
100% 
Isoquinoline 
4 
-­‐ 
100% 
2-­‐methyl-­‐nasalene 
287 
-­‐ 
100% 
1-­‐methyl-­‐nasalene 
212 
-­‐ 
100% 
Biphenyl 
219 
-­‐ 
100% 
Ethenyl-­‐naphtalene 
197 
1 
99% 
Acenaphtylene 
1.070 
1 
100% 
Acenaphtene 
70 
0 
100% 
Detec5on 
limit 
is 
2,5 
mg/Nm3
OLGA 
Performance, 
gas 
analysis 
Component 
(values 
in 
mg/Nm3) 
Raw 
Gas 
AWer 
OLGA 
Efficiency 
Fluorene 
425 
-­‐ 
100% 
Phenanthrene 
1.076 
-­‐ 
100% 
Anthracene 
398 
-­‐ 
100% 
Fluoranthene 
505 
-­‐ 
100% 
Pyrene 
609 
-­‐ 
100% 
Benzo(a)-­‐anthracene 
184 
-­‐ 
100% 
Chrysene 
167 
-­‐ 
100% 
Benzo(b)-­‐fluoranthene 
123 
-­‐ 
100% 
Benzo(k)-­‐fluoranthene 
47 
-­‐ 
100% 
Benzo(e)-­‐pyrene 
71 
-­‐ 
100% 
Benzo(a)-­‐pyrene 
148 
-­‐ 
100% 
Perylene 
24 
-­‐ 
100% 
Indeno(123-­‐cd)-­‐perylene 
73 
-­‐ 
100% 
Dibenz(ah)-­‐anthracene 
18 
-­‐ 
100% 
Benzo(ghi)-­‐perylene 
57 
-­‐ 
100% 
Coronene 
30 
-­‐ 
100% 
Total 
known 
tar 
components 
11.415 
117 
99% 
Total 
unknown 
tars 
5.691 
54 
99%
OLGA 
Performance, 
gas 
analysis 
Parameter 
Unit 
Raw 
Gas 
AWer 
OLGA 
Efficiency 
Total 
tar 
mg/Nm³ 
(dry) 
17.106 
171 
99,0% 
Total 
tar 
excl. 
BTX 
mg/Nm³ 
(dry) 
16.040 
63 
99,6% 
Total 
tar 
excl. 
BTX 
& 
unknowns 
mg/Nm³ 
(dry) 
10.349 
9 
99,9% 
Naphthalene 
(key-­‐component) 
mg/Nm³ 
(dry) 
2.822 
< 
2,5 
> 
99,9% 
Phenol 
(key-­‐component) 
mg/Nm³ 
(dry) 
386 
< 
2,5 
> 
99,9% 
Tar 
dewpoint 
° 
C 
> 
350 
< 
15 
° 
F 
> 
660 
< 
59 
Tar 
aerosols 
(incl. 
dust) 
mg/Nm³ 
(dry) 
-­‐-­‐ 
10
OLGA 
tar 
removal
Clean 
Product 
Gas 
specifica5on 
Clean 
Product 
Gas 
MILENA 
MILENA 
Air 
blown 
CFB 
Oxygen 
/ 
Steam 
blown 
CFB 
Specifica[on 
Olivine 
bed 
Sand 
bed 
Sand 
bed 
Sand 
bed 
Refuse 
Derived 
Fuel 
(RDF), 
25% 
moisture, 
16% 
ash, 
21,6 
MJ/kg 
LHV 
daf 
>> 
Carbon 
to 
Gas 
efficiency 
100% 
100% 
95% 
95% 
Cold 
Gas 
efficiency 
(excl. 
tars) 
~ 
80% 
~ 
80% 
70 
-­‐ 
75% 
70 
-­‐ 
75% 
Product 
gas 
composi[on 
(vol%) 
Clean 
product 
gas 
downstream 
OLGA 
& 
water 
condensa[on 
@ 
6% 
water 
CO 
15,0 
22,0 
12,5 
28,0 
H2 
21,3 
14,2 
11,3 
21,6 
CO2 
22,6 
15,8 
13,1 
29,7 
O2 
0,0 
0,0 
0,0 
0,0 
H2O 
6,0 
6,0 
6,0 
6,0 
CH4 
12,7 
15,3 
2,9 
8,6 
N2 
(with 
air 
fluidiza5on) 
9,4 
10,9 
51,2 
0,6 
CxHy 
(>CH4 
& 
< 
toluene) 
11,5 
13,9 
1,7 
3,7 
Total 
98,5 
98,1 
98,7 
98,1 
LHV 
(wet) 
(MJ/Nm3) 
17,1 
19,8 
4,8 
11,3 
LHV 
(wet) 
(Btu/ss) 
427 
495 
130 
303 
Wobbe 
(LHV, 
MJ/Nm3) 
18,6 
21,8 
5,1 
12,0 
Wobbe 
(LHV, 
Btu/scf) 
464 
545 
137 
321
Set 
up 
CHP 
– 
IGCC 
plant 
with 
OLGA 
1-­‐10 
MWe 
Gas 
engines 
+ 
ORC 
6-­‐50 
MWe 
IGCC 
Gas 
turbine 
combined 
cycle
Engine 
or 
Turbine? 
Gas 
engines 
• Available 
for 
product 
gas 
in 
1-­‐2 
MWe 
per 
engine 
• Loss 
with 
ac5ve 
cooling 
• Typical 
availability 
85% 
• Lower 
power 
output 
on 
product 
gas 
vs. 
on 
natural 
gas 
(10% 
-­‐ 
50% 
dera5ng) 
• Lower 
capex, 
higher 
opex 
1-­‐10 
MWe 
Gas 
turbines 
• Available 
Gas 
engines 
+ 
ORC 
for 
product 
gas 
in 
6 
MWe 
per 
turbine 
and 
larger 
capaci5es 
• Very 
low 
loss 
but 
compressor 
parasi5c 
• High 
availability, 
typical 
96% 
• Higher 
power 
output 
on 
product 
gas 
vs. 
on 
natural 
gas 
(expansion 
advantage 
+10%) 
• Higher 
capex, 
lower 
opex 
6-­‐50 
MWe 
IGCC 
Gas 
turbine 
combined 
cycle
MILENA-­‐OLGA 
CHP-­‐IGCC 
efficiencies 
Net 
plant 
efficiency 
to 
useful 
low 
quality 
heat 
Net 
plant 
efficiency 
to 
high 
quality 
heat 
Net 
plant 
efficiency 
to 
power 
26% 
32% 
17% 
31% 
25% 
39% 
32% 
48% 
47% 
13% 
13% 
16% 
16% 
21% 
21% 
100% 
90% 
80% 
70% 
60% 
50% 
40% 
30% 
20% 
10% 
0% 
Gas 
Engine 
Gas 
Engine 
+ 
ORC 
GT 
single 
cycle 
GT 
comb. 
cycle 
GT 
single 
cycle 
GT 
comb. 
cycle 
24 
MWth 
24 
MWth 
160 
MWth 
155 
ton/day 
RDF 
153 
ton/day 
RDF 
1035 
ton/day 
RDF
Waste 
to 
Energy 
-­‐ 
ETI 
selec5on 
Worlds 
most 
efficient 
waste 
to 
energy 
technology 
contest 
• The 
UK 
based 
Energy 
Technologies 
Ins5tute 
(ETI) 
selected 
Royal 
Dahlman 
with 
two 
UK 
companies 
to 
compete 
in 
this 
challenge 
• In 
January 
‘14, 
we 
completed 
a 
FEED 
study 
which 
included 
extensive 
tests 
on 
UK 
waste 
• In 
the 
coming 
months 
the 
winner 
will 
be 
announced, 
which 
will 
receive 
an 
ETI 
investment 
for 
the 
demonstra5on 
plant
The 
Grimsby 
Renewable 
Power 
facility 
Project 
Sta[s[cs 
Project 
loca5on 
Moody 
Lane, 
Grimsby, 
Lincolnshire, 
UK 
Plant 
commercial 
feedstock 
Flexible: 
RDF 
-­‐ 
SRF 
-­‐ 
Biomass 
Waste 
input 
(at 
MRF) 
60.000 
to 
80.000 
tpa 
(based 
on 
typical 
MRF 
opera5on) 
Plant 
RDF/SRF 
input 
37.000 
tpa 
SRF 
or 
47.000 
tpa 
RDF 
Plant 
input 
energy 
22-­‐23 
MW 
(LHV) 
at 
nominal 
capacity 
Plant 
gross 
electricity 
genera5on 
8,8 
MW 
Plant 
net 
electricity 
sales 
7,0 
MW 
(op5misa5on 
to 
7,6 
MW 
possible)
MILENA 
– 
OLGA 
Most 
Efficient 
EFW 
MRF 
The 
GRP 
facility 
receives 
RDF/SRF 
in 
bales, 
but 
also 
has 
MRF 
func5onality 
for 
flexibility 
and 
robustness. 
Two 
shredders, 
a 
sieve 
and 
magnet 
belts 
MILENA 
The 
MILENA 
scope 
includes 
flue 
gas 
treatment, 
coolers 
and 
the 
cyclones 
OLGA 
-­‐ 
AQUA 
OLGA 
(green) 
captures 
tars 
and 
dust 
and 
recycles 
these 
to 
the 
MILENA. 
Downstream 
OLGA 
(blue) 
water 
is 
condensed 
out 
and 
components 
such 
as 
HCl 
and 
NH3 
are 
removed 
Power 
Block 
A 
Solar/Caterpillar 
Taurus60 
gas 
turbine, 
heat 
recovery 
steam 
generator 
and 
a 
steam 
turbine 
that 
also 
receives 
steam 
from 
the 
MILENA 
coolers
Waste 
to 
Energy 
-­‐ 
ETI 
selec5on 
22 
MW 
RDF 
from 
UK 
waste, 
to 
7 
MW 
net 
electricity
Waste 
to 
Energy 
-­‐ 
ETI 
selec5on 
MILENA 
gasifier 
Power 
block 
OLGA 
– 
AQUA 
gas 
cleaning
MILENA-­‐OLGA 
to 
gaseous 
and 
liquid 
fuels 
MILENA-­‐OLGA 
delivers 
a 
clean 
nitrogen 
free 
gas 
suitable 
for 
cataly[c 
conversion 
to 
several 
gaseous 
and 
liquid 
fuels 
• CH4 
– 
SNG 
– 
“green 
gas” 
• Fisher-­‐Tropsch 
diesel 
• H2 
• Methanol 
• Ethanol 
• Jet 
fuels 
• Mixed 
alcohols, 
Etc.
Research 
opportuni5es 
at 
Investa 
MILENA 
– 
OLGA 
– 
SNG 
line-­‐up 
Tie-­‐in 
for 
full 
or 
slip 
stream 
tests 
the 
plant 
capacity, 
≈ 
4 
MWth 
Clean 
product 
gas 
at 
18-­‐20 
MJ/Nm3 
(540-­‐600 
Nm3/hr) 
Available 
at 
1 
bara, 
6 
bara 
or 
40 
bara
Thank 
You! 
Mar5n 
van 
‘t 
Hoff 
m.vanthoff@dahlman.nl 
www.renewableenergy.nl

More Related Content

Syngas to Electricity - Martin van 't Hoff

  • 1. Syngas to Power Advanced Gasifica5on, Gas Cleaning and Product Gas u5liza5on Alkmaar, The Netherlands October 2nd 2014 Presented by: Mar5n van ‘t Hoff Biomass Gasifica5on Europe 2014
  • 2. Presenta5on contents • Co-­‐opera5on Royal Dahlman -­‐ ECN • MILENA gasifica5on • OLGA product gas cleaning • Electricity via gas engines and gas turbines • Waste to Energy project • Gaseous and liquid fuels • Research opportuni5es at Investa
  • 3. ECN & Royal Dahlman • Applied R&D; Transfer from fundamental research to a system which is ready for the market • Scien5sts, lab & pilot facili5es • Process modelling • Measurements and analysis • Patent holder of MILENA & OLGA technology • Coopera5on with Royal Dahlman on biomass and waste gasifica5on since 2001 • Engineering and produc5on of technology based equipment • Commercial system design • Technology delivery to the market • License holder of MILENA and OLGA technology • OLGA commercial demonstrated • MILENA is launched on the market based on ECN license and Royal Dahlman marke5ng & engineering
  • 4. Biomass vs. Coal gasifica5on Syngas vs. product gas, reason for confusion! • Highly reac5ve fuels such as coal or tar-­‐oil are gasified with oxygen at temperatures above 1200 °C and produce a ‘syngas’ CO – H2 and CO2 – H2O. • Biomass or waste gasifica5on has a reac5on temperature of 700 -­‐ 950 °C and produce a ‘product gas’ (syngas + hydrocarbons) CO – H2 – CH4 – C2H6 – tars and CO2 – H2O.
  • 5. Biomass vs. Coal gasifica5on (2) • Coal gasifiers have a very large scale of economy • Coal (entrained flow) gasifiers need fine powders or slurries, they are not suitable for biomass or waste (chips, fluff) • We aim for high efficiencies on a scale of 5 to 50 MWe • Our fuel: wood, waste & agricultural residues Examples (L to R): Waste wood Soya Stalk RDF from MSW
  • 6. The MILENA gasifier MILENA an indirect gasifier • Both reactors in one refractory lined reactor vessel • 100% carbon to gas ra5o o Resul5ng in carbon free ash, less waste, cleaner waste & safer waste o Resul5ng in a higher cold gas efficiency (5 to 15% higher on LHV basis) • Separate flue gas exhaust, no or minimized nitrogen dilu5on of the product gas o Compared to air blown gasifica5on a 3 to 4 5mes higher hea5ng value. o Compared to oxygen/steam blown gasifica5on a much higher efficiency (no ASU parasi5c), while s5ll having 60% more hea5ng value o Very suitable for cataly5c upgrading & gas turbines
  • 8. Gasifica5on product gas cleaning Simplified… • Solid par5culates • Organic impuri5es (tars, dioxins) mainly dependant upon gasifier type and opera5onal characteris5cs • Inorganic impuri5es (H2S, HCl, NH3 etc.) mainly dependant upon feedstock composi5on • Other impuri5es (heavy metals, HCN, COS etc.) mainly dependant upon feedstock composi5on • A dirty feedstock (waste) is alrac5ve, but results in more cleaning efforts
  • 9. The tar problem 1. Heavy tars • Condensa5on leads to fouling < 400 -­‐ 450°C • Tar dew point is cri5cal parameter Deactivation of catalyst (SNG production) Fouling of equipment (gas cleaning) Plugging of an intercooler (gas engines/turbines)
  • 10. The tar problem 2. Light tars • Heterocyclic compounds (phenol) are water soluble, condensate & scrubber water is poisoned • Naphthalene can cause crystalliza5on problems Phenol Naphthalene
  • 11. Naphthalene crystals on gas engine control valve The tar problem
  • 12. OLGA Tar removal Portugal: CFB gasifier, OLGA gas cleaning, Caterpillar 3516A+ gas engine OLGA, a tar/oil based gas scrubber • OLGA captures tars with high efficiencies, well within specifica5on for gas engines, gas turbines and cataly5c processes (SNG, FT-­‐diesel). • OLGA does not convert the tars by using electricity or combus5ng part of the product gas. OLGA captures tars and recycles these as fuel to the gasifier. • OLGA has low pressure drop and only consumes some electricity for pumps and tracing < 0,1 MW for a 10 MW gross electric plant (1%). • OLGA does not change the main gas composi5on, high energy carriers like methane, ethene and the bulk of the benzene and toluene stay in the product gas. • OLGA is able to handle very high tar loads, up to 50 g/Nm3 allowing us to op5mize the MILENA.
  • 13. OLGA & dew points Temperature °C Dew points & process choices T = 850°C Cooler Particle separation Water dew point ± 75˚C Actual temperature 450 – 500°C Tar dew point 400-­‐450˚C
  • 14. Dew points are important! Condensation Temperature °C Dew points & process choices Tar dew point 400-­‐450˚C Water dew point ± 75˚C Tar dew point < 10˚C) Absorption Cooler OLGA Separation of: tars & fine particles Particle separation T = 850°C Actual temperature
  • 15. Dew points are important! Condensation Temperature °C Dew points & process choices Tar dew point 400-­‐450˚C Water dew point ± 75˚C Do not mix tar & water! Tar dew point < 10˚C Absorption Cooler OLGA Separation of: tars & fine particles Particle separation T = 850°C Actual temperature Water Quench, condenser & scrubber (inorganics) WDP 30ºC Actual temperature
  • 16. PFD -­‐ OLGA with cyclone OLGA; a waste free system!
  • 17. OLGA Performance, gas analysis Component (values in mg/Nm3) Raw Gas AWer OLGA Efficiency Benzene (not a tar component) 644 428 34% Toluene 439 101 77% Ethylbenzene 8 1 87% m/p-­‐Xylene 68 2 97% o-­‐Xylene+Styrene 551 4 99% Phenol 597 -­‐ 100% Indeen+o-­‐cresol 864 4 100% m/p-­‐Cresol 36 -­‐ 100% Naphthalene 2.822 2 100% Quinoline 14 -­‐ 100% Isoquinoline 4 -­‐ 100% 2-­‐methyl-­‐nasalene 287 -­‐ 100% 1-­‐methyl-­‐nasalene 212 -­‐ 100% Biphenyl 219 -­‐ 100% Ethenyl-­‐naphtalene 197 1 99% Acenaphtylene 1.070 1 100% Acenaphtene 70 0 100% Detec5on limit is 2,5 mg/Nm3
  • 18. OLGA Performance, gas analysis Component (values in mg/Nm3) Raw Gas AWer OLGA Efficiency Fluorene 425 -­‐ 100% Phenanthrene 1.076 -­‐ 100% Anthracene 398 -­‐ 100% Fluoranthene 505 -­‐ 100% Pyrene 609 -­‐ 100% Benzo(a)-­‐anthracene 184 -­‐ 100% Chrysene 167 -­‐ 100% Benzo(b)-­‐fluoranthene 123 -­‐ 100% Benzo(k)-­‐fluoranthene 47 -­‐ 100% Benzo(e)-­‐pyrene 71 -­‐ 100% Benzo(a)-­‐pyrene 148 -­‐ 100% Perylene 24 -­‐ 100% Indeno(123-­‐cd)-­‐perylene 73 -­‐ 100% Dibenz(ah)-­‐anthracene 18 -­‐ 100% Benzo(ghi)-­‐perylene 57 -­‐ 100% Coronene 30 -­‐ 100% Total known tar components 11.415 117 99% Total unknown tars 5.691 54 99%
  • 19. OLGA Performance, gas analysis Parameter Unit Raw Gas AWer OLGA Efficiency Total tar mg/Nm³ (dry) 17.106 171 99,0% Total tar excl. BTX mg/Nm³ (dry) 16.040 63 99,6% Total tar excl. BTX & unknowns mg/Nm³ (dry) 10.349 9 99,9% Naphthalene (key-­‐component) mg/Nm³ (dry) 2.822 < 2,5 > 99,9% Phenol (key-­‐component) mg/Nm³ (dry) 386 < 2,5 > 99,9% Tar dewpoint ° C > 350 < 15 ° F > 660 < 59 Tar aerosols (incl. dust) mg/Nm³ (dry) -­‐-­‐ 10
  • 21. Clean Product Gas specifica5on Clean Product Gas MILENA MILENA Air blown CFB Oxygen / Steam blown CFB Specifica[on Olivine bed Sand bed Sand bed Sand bed Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF), 25% moisture, 16% ash, 21,6 MJ/kg LHV daf >> Carbon to Gas efficiency 100% 100% 95% 95% Cold Gas efficiency (excl. tars) ~ 80% ~ 80% 70 -­‐ 75% 70 -­‐ 75% Product gas composi[on (vol%) Clean product gas downstream OLGA & water condensa[on @ 6% water CO 15,0 22,0 12,5 28,0 H2 21,3 14,2 11,3 21,6 CO2 22,6 15,8 13,1 29,7 O2 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 H2O 6,0 6,0 6,0 6,0 CH4 12,7 15,3 2,9 8,6 N2 (with air fluidiza5on) 9,4 10,9 51,2 0,6 CxHy (>CH4 & < toluene) 11,5 13,9 1,7 3,7 Total 98,5 98,1 98,7 98,1 LHV (wet) (MJ/Nm3) 17,1 19,8 4,8 11,3 LHV (wet) (Btu/ss) 427 495 130 303 Wobbe (LHV, MJ/Nm3) 18,6 21,8 5,1 12,0 Wobbe (LHV, Btu/scf) 464 545 137 321
  • 22. Set up CHP – IGCC plant with OLGA 1-­‐10 MWe Gas engines + ORC 6-­‐50 MWe IGCC Gas turbine combined cycle
  • 23. Engine or Turbine? Gas engines • Available for product gas in 1-­‐2 MWe per engine • Loss with ac5ve cooling • Typical availability 85% • Lower power output on product gas vs. on natural gas (10% -­‐ 50% dera5ng) • Lower capex, higher opex 1-­‐10 MWe Gas turbines • Available Gas engines + ORC for product gas in 6 MWe per turbine and larger capaci5es • Very low loss but compressor parasi5c • High availability, typical 96% • Higher power output on product gas vs. on natural gas (expansion advantage +10%) • Higher capex, lower opex 6-­‐50 MWe IGCC Gas turbine combined cycle
  • 24. MILENA-­‐OLGA CHP-­‐IGCC efficiencies Net plant efficiency to useful low quality heat Net plant efficiency to high quality heat Net plant efficiency to power 26% 32% 17% 31% 25% 39% 32% 48% 47% 13% 13% 16% 16% 21% 21% 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Gas Engine Gas Engine + ORC GT single cycle GT comb. cycle GT single cycle GT comb. cycle 24 MWth 24 MWth 160 MWth 155 ton/day RDF 153 ton/day RDF 1035 ton/day RDF
  • 25. Waste to Energy -­‐ ETI selec5on Worlds most efficient waste to energy technology contest • The UK based Energy Technologies Ins5tute (ETI) selected Royal Dahlman with two UK companies to compete in this challenge • In January ‘14, we completed a FEED study which included extensive tests on UK waste • In the coming months the winner will be announced, which will receive an ETI investment for the demonstra5on plant
  • 26. The Grimsby Renewable Power facility Project Sta[s[cs Project loca5on Moody Lane, Grimsby, Lincolnshire, UK Plant commercial feedstock Flexible: RDF -­‐ SRF -­‐ Biomass Waste input (at MRF) 60.000 to 80.000 tpa (based on typical MRF opera5on) Plant RDF/SRF input 37.000 tpa SRF or 47.000 tpa RDF Plant input energy 22-­‐23 MW (LHV) at nominal capacity Plant gross electricity genera5on 8,8 MW Plant net electricity sales 7,0 MW (op5misa5on to 7,6 MW possible)
  • 27. MILENA – OLGA Most Efficient EFW MRF The GRP facility receives RDF/SRF in bales, but also has MRF func5onality for flexibility and robustness. Two shredders, a sieve and magnet belts MILENA The MILENA scope includes flue gas treatment, coolers and the cyclones OLGA -­‐ AQUA OLGA (green) captures tars and dust and recycles these to the MILENA. Downstream OLGA (blue) water is condensed out and components such as HCl and NH3 are removed Power Block A Solar/Caterpillar Taurus60 gas turbine, heat recovery steam generator and a steam turbine that also receives steam from the MILENA coolers
  • 28. Waste to Energy -­‐ ETI selec5on 22 MW RDF from UK waste, to 7 MW net electricity
  • 29. Waste to Energy -­‐ ETI selec5on MILENA gasifier Power block OLGA – AQUA gas cleaning
  • 30. MILENA-­‐OLGA to gaseous and liquid fuels MILENA-­‐OLGA delivers a clean nitrogen free gas suitable for cataly[c conversion to several gaseous and liquid fuels • CH4 – SNG – “green gas” • Fisher-­‐Tropsch diesel • H2 • Methanol • Ethanol • Jet fuels • Mixed alcohols, Etc.
  • 31. Research opportuni5es at Investa MILENA – OLGA – SNG line-­‐up Tie-­‐in for full or slip stream tests the plant capacity, ≈ 4 MWth Clean product gas at 18-­‐20 MJ/Nm3 (540-­‐600 Nm3/hr) Available at 1 bara, 6 bara or 40 bara
  • 32. Thank You! Mar5n van ‘t Hoff m.vanthoff@dahlman.nl www.renewableenergy.nl