This document provides a summary of the novel "A Passage to India" by E.M. Forster. It discusses the main themes of the novel, including colonialism, friendship, race, culture, and the backdrop of British rule in India in the 1920s. The story revolves around the relationships between British and Indian characters and how their potential for friendship is hindered by the social and political tensions between their cultures under the colonial system. Forster is critical of British colonialism and its negative impacts on both Indian and British people. While emphasizing the importance of friendship and humanism, the novel ultimately suggests that true friendship between Indians and British is nearly impossible given the divides reinforced by colonial rule.
2. introduction
A Passage to India (1924) is a novel by English author E. M.
Forster set against the backdrop of the British Raj and the Indian
independence movement in the 1920s. It was selected as one of the
100 great works of 20th century English literature by the Modern
Library[1] and won the 1924 JamesTait Black Memorial Prize for
fiction.[2] Time magazine included the novel in its "AllTime 100
Novels" list.[3] The novel is based on Forster's experiences in India,
borrowing the title[4] fromWaltWhitman's 1870 poem[5] in Leaves of
Grass.
The story revolves around four characters: Dr. Aziz, his British friend
Mr. Cyril Fielding, Mrs. Moore, and Miss Adela Quested. During a trip
to the MarabarCaves (modeled on the Barbara Caves of
Bihar),[6] Adela thinks she finds herself alone with Dr.Aziz in one of
the caves (when in fact he is in an entirely different cave), and
subsequently panics and flees; it is assumed that Dr. Aziz has
attempted to assault her. Aziz's trial, and its run-up and aftermath,
bring to a boil the common racial tensions and prejudices between
indigenous Indians and the British who rule India.
3. Themes in the novelsome
Colonialism
On one level, A Passage to India is an in-depth description of daily life in India under
British rule.The British “Raj” (its colonial empire in India) lasted from 1858 to 1947. The
prevailing attitude behind colonialism was that of the “white man’s burden” (in
Rudyard Kipling’s phrase)—that it was the moral duty of Europeans to “civilize” other
nations. Thus the British saw their colonial rule over India as being for the Indians’ own
good. Forster himself was British, but in the novel he is very critical of colonialism. He
never goes so far as to advocate outright Indian rebellion, but he does show how the
colonial system is inherently flawed. Forster portrays most of the British men working
in India as at least well-meaning, although condescending and unoriginal, but their
positions in the colonial system almost always push them towards becoming racist and
harmful figures. This is played out most explicitly in the development of Ronny’s
character. The British women, apart from Mrs. Moore and Adela, often seem less
sympathetic than the men, to the point that even Turton blames their presence for the
tensions with the Indians.The women don’t have the daily labor and interactions with
Indians that the men do, but they are generally more racially hateful and
condescending (and perhaps this is because they are usually so isolated from actual
Indian society).
Forster also shows how the colonial system makes the Indians hate and sometimes
condescend to the British. The colonialists are by necessity in the role of “oppressor,”
no matter how individually kind or open-minded they might be.This is best shown in
the changes to Aziz’s character throughout the novel, as he goes from laughing at and
befriending the English to actively hating them. Although Forster ultimately offers no
concrete alternative to British colonialism, his overall message is that colonialism in
India is a harmful system for both the British and the Indians. Friendships like that
between Aziz and Fielding are a rare exception, not the rule, and even such friendships
are all but destroyed or thwarted by the problems and tensions of colonialism.
4. Friendship
Despite its strong political overtones, A Passage to India is also a deep psychological portrayal of
different individuals.As Forster describes his characters’ inner lives and their interactions with each
other, the subject of friendship becomes very important, as it is shown as the most powerful
connection between two individuals apart from romantic love.This subject relates to Forster’s
humanistic philosophy—which says that friendship, interpersonal kindness, and respect can be the
greatest forces for good in the world—but in the novel, friendship must always struggle with cultural
divides and the imbalance in power enforced by the colonial system.The book begins and ends with
the subject of friendship between an Englishman and an Indian, and in both cases it concludes that
such a friendship is almost impossible. Forster shows all the obstacles—race, culture, class, religion,
and language—that stand in the way of meaningful friendships between Indians and the English, no
matter an individual’s best intentions.The English view the Indians as inferior, while the Indians
(includingAziz) view the English as both cruel oppressors and foolish foreigners.
Towards the middle of the novel, however,Aziz’s growing friendships with both Mrs. Moore and
Fielding seem to be an example of successful humanism, implying that if both parties can treat each
other with respect, kindness, and open-mindedness, then even Englishmen and Indians can be
friends, and British colonialism could become a beneficial system.After the experience in
the Marabar Caves, however, Mrs. Moore ends up going mad and dying, and Fielding and Aziz’s
friendship starts to fall apart. After Aziz’s trial, each man ends up returning to his own cultural circle.
Fielding feels sympathetic to Adela, whileAziz lets his suspicions harden into a hatred of all the
English. In the novel’s final scene the two men become reconciled just as they are about to part
forever.They embrace while riding together, but then their horses separate and they are divided by
the landscape itself, which seems to say “not yet.” Such friendship might be possible once India is
free, but not yet in the colonial system.Thus Forster doesn’t let go of his humanistic ideals, but he
does show how such ideals can be hindered by social systems and cultural divides.
5. Race and Culture
Many observations about race and culture in colonial India are threaded throughout the
novel. A Passage to India is in some ways a sort of ethnography, or an examination of the
customs of different cultures.On the English side, many cultural forces affect the
characters. Ronny is naturally goodhearted and sympathetic, but his “public school mindset”
and the influence of his English peers compel him to become hardened and unkind to Indians.
The other English expatriates view Adela as naïve for sympathizing with the Indians, and they
even admit that they too felt the same at first before realizing the “truth.” Overall the
pervading culture of the English in India is that one must adopt a racist, patronizing attitude
to survive and thrive, and that one’s very Englishness makes one superior to the Indians.
Forster also examines the English tendency to be rational without emotion, and what is
perceived as the English lack of imagination.
Forster gives equal time to analyzing Indian culture.On one level he portrays the many
religions and cultures of the country, which are part of the reason India remains so internally
divided. On the individual level,Aziz is the best-developed Indian character, and he too (like
the English) is subject to cultural norms. Forster portrays the Indians as generally more
emotional and imaginative than the English, with a tendency to let stray notions harden into
solid beliefs without evidence.This “ethnography” then informs the novel’s other themes of
division, friendship, and colonialism.Overall Forster shows that race and culture are forces
that cannot be altogether avoided, no matter a person’s individual intentions. Forster gives
the greatest importance to interpersonal human interaction and friendship, but he also
recognizes the pervasive influence of larger social forces.