This document examines the effectiveness of celebrity endorsements in advertising. It analyzes data from over 2,600 ads to determine if celebrity ads perform better than non-celebrity ads. The analysis finds that contrary to popular belief, celebrity ads do not generally perform better and often perform worse than non-celebrity ads. While clever uses of celebrities can be effective, the creative content of the ad is more important for driving positive responses from viewers than the celebrity endorsement alone. Employing celebrities also carries business risks if they become associated with scandals. The evidence suggests celebrities are not a simple or guaranteed way to improve ad effectiveness.
2. CELEBRITY ADVERTISEMENTS 2
Copyright 2013. Ace Metrix, Inc. All rights reserved. Content contained in this document is the property of Ace Metrix and
must be treated as proprietary. Distribution of this document outside of Ace Metrix, without prior written consent from Ace
Metrix, is prohibited. Ace Metrix, Ace Score and the Ace Metrix logo design are registered trademarks and Ace Metrix LIVE,
Ace Metrix PRE, Ace Metrix TREND, Ace Metrix TARGET, and Ace Metrix MOBILE are trademarks of Ace Metrix, Inc. in the
United States and other jurisdictions. All other trademarks the property of their respective owners. Ace Metrix assumes no
responsibility for any inaccuracies in this document. Ace Metrix reserves the right to change, modify, transfer, or otherwise
revise this publication without notice. AMInsight_Celeb_2.8.13v1
Published March 2012, reprinted February 2013.
ACE METRIX, INC. PROPRIETARY
3. Executive Summary
Popular wisdom asserts that getting a celebrity endorsement is a tried-and-true, simple-to-implement
way to maximize advertising effectiveness that yields stronger ties with viewers and, ultimately, greater
sales. Not only do advertisers incorporate celebrity endorsements into campaigns, frequently they
develop campaigns around them.
Our study of more than 2,600 ads found that—contrary to popular wisdom—celebrity ads do not
perform any better than non-celebrity ads, and in some cases they perform much worse. In our data,
whether or not a celebrity endorses a product was unimportant in determining whether an ad
resonated with viewers. In fact, when compared with industry norms, relatively few celebrity ads were
able to earn performance marks above their industry averages.
A quick glance at the most recent ads for TVs foreshadows the results from our full-scale study. Over
and over again, our analysis illustrated that celebrity ads performed either below average or merely
equaled it. With rare exception, celebrity endorsements were largely ineffective and failed to yield the
benefits popular wisdom promises.
Television Ads From September-December 2010: Average Score = 572
Consequently, given the cost of these endorsements (some estimates upwards of $50 billion), there is
a greater return for advertising executives who focus on the creative content of an ad, in particular
aspects of the messaging that grab attention, demonstrate relevance, and inform viewers about the
product rather than the endorser. These creative components—not celebrity endorsements—drive
positive responses from viewers and resonate across demographics.
Clever and creative use of celebrities in advertisements can be effective given the right
context. We have seen this with Troy Polamlu for Head & Shoulders, Betty White and Aretha Franklin
for Snickers, among others, however it is important to keep in mind that if viewers are confused or do
not understand the connection between the celebrity and the product, receptivity to the ad can be
negative. Moreover, the inherent risk in affixing business interests to imperfect, individual
personalities should warrant additional concern.
Celebrities are often polarizing—even within demographic targets. A good example is with Cosmetics.
Some women believe Sarah Jessica Parker is beautiful, but others do not – the eye of the beholder
issue. Brett Favre is another highly polarizing celebrity. This creates uncertainty and risk beyond the
campaign message.
4. In sum, popular wisdom requires revision: the evidence shows that celebrities alone cannot make an
ad successful and do not serve as a simple, easy way to improve ad effectiveness. Advertising
executives are wise to focus on messaging and keep a close eye on the potential downside of celebrity
endorsement.
Introduction
One of the most widely held beliefs in advertising professes that celebrity ad endorsements enhance
persuasion and improve advertising effectiveness. The rationale behind this perspective argues that
celebrities are better able to connect with viewers by increasing attention levels, being likeable, by
utilizing perceived credibility to lobby for the product, and, ultimately, by merging positive associations
of the celebrity with the product. In brief, celebrities are supposed to make viewers feel more
connected with the product and more likely to choose the product over the competition. This positive
view of celebrity endorsement is so widespread that it is not surprising that celebrities currently
appear in about 15 percent of advertisements in the United States while “an estimated $50 billion is
invested globally on corporate sponsorships and endorsements” (Crutchfield, 2010).
A recent article in Ad Age (“Celebrity Endorsements Still Push Product”, September 22, 2010)
restated the pro-celebrity endorsement perspective, arguing that the possible benefits of celebrity
endorsements outweigh the risks. The article noted that previous academic studies have found
correlations between the announcement of celebrity endorsements and both stock market
fluctuations as well as short-term sales figures. In addition, the article observed that celebrity ads
have always been stylish and have a long history of being used in advertising. While it is difficult to
argue that advertisements have frequently featured celebrities, whether or not those celebrity
endorsements effectively impacted audiences, improved sales, or generated positive ROI remains
unanswered. Moreover, a clear caveat regarding these studies is that not every celebrity endorsement
1
is positively correlated with sales or stock market returns. In other words, not all celebrities are equal
when it comes to product endorsement advertisements.
From an alternative perspective, others question whether celebrity endorsements really bring benefit
to the products and brands they endorse. Purveyors of this perspective argue that celebrity
endorsements are expensive and may not “pay-off” by improving sales, brand imagery, or ROI. While it
is easy to identify exemplars (e.g., Michael Jordan for Nike), naysayers question whether positive
celebrity effects are the exception or the rule. For instance, a recent article in The New York Times
reported the results of an online advertisement analysis which showed that celebrity endorsements
failed to garner as many viewers as ads not featuring celebrities (“In Online Ads, Celebrities Fall
Short”, December 19, 2010).
Finally, it is worth noting that corporations take on real business risk when tying their brand to a single,
fallible individual. Despite having earned $1 billion from endorsements over the course of his
advertising career, Tiger Woods is currently a pariah among advertisers in search of celebrity backing.
Yahoo! Finance recently reported that Gillette, Accenture, AT&T, and Gatorade have all decided they
will no longer use Woods as a spokesperson (“Gillette Won’t Renew Contract With Tiger Woods”,
December 23, 2010). This is hardly surprising given the negative media attention focused on Woods’
1
This is not to mention that sales figures and stock market returns are time-dependent results. Correlation-based findings
indicating the impact of celebrity endorsements on various financial outcomes should not be ephemeral in order to truly
assign credit to celebrity endorsement.
5. private life and speaks to the point that celebrity endorsements may have greater costs to
corporations than just talent service fees. In other words, the tolls associated with additional public
relations advising should factor into the overall calculus of enlisting a celebrity to endorse products.
The case of Tiger Woods is not an unusual one. Examples abound. After being charged with dog-
fighting, Nike severed ties with Michael Vick. When Kobe Bryant was accused of sexual assault,
McDonald’s ended their relationship with him. Recently, Wrangler and Snapper decided to stand by
Brett Favre as he faces sexual harassment claims (“Sponsors Wrangler, Snapper Stick With Brett
Favre”, December 30, 2010).
OBJECTIVES
Despite its high price tag, a celebrity endorsement is frequently mentioned as an easy way to improve
both brand imagery and sales. Conventional wisdom has it that celebrity endorsements distinguish
and separate products from the competition. Moreover, in certain industries celebrity endorsements
appear to be a barrier-to-entry (e.g., Apparel & Footwear).
Although theories of persuasion point toward the potential benefits from celebrity endorsements (e.g.,
cognitive cues, identification, etc.), the question of whether celebrities positively affect advertising is
an empirical one.
Do celebrity ads actually outperform their non-celebrity counterparts? Moreover, in a relative sense,
do some celebrities resonate better with viewers than others? What kind of distribution of success and
failure exists among celebrity ads?
METHODOLOGY
Ace Metrix has developed a unique approach to measuring the creative effectiveness of television
advertising. Leveraging a standardized survey instrument and proprietary scoring algorithm Ace
Metrix has scored more than 9,000 television advertisements; in doing so, Ace Metrix has created the
world’s largest syndicated database of television advertising effectiveness.
Ace Metrix standardized questions fall under two major dimensions of TV advertising effectiveness:
the persuasive power of an ad’s content (Persuasion) and the likelihood of repeat viewing
(Watchability). A unique set of factors are measured for each dimension.
For the Persuasion dimension, six factors are measured:
• Desire (the extent to which the ad generates/increases desire for the product/service in
viewers’ eyes)
• Relevance (the extent to which viewers can relate to ad’s content)
• Information (the extent to which the ad communicates new information)
• Likeability (the extent to which viewers like the ad)
• Change (the extent to which the ad causes viewers to sense that the brand is moving in a
new direction)
• Attention (the extent to which the ad attracts and holds viewers’ attention)
For the Watchability dimension, the likelihood of repeat viewing is measured under the 3 viewing
conditions:
6. • While watching their favorite TV program (high involvement TV viewing condition)
• While watching TV with mild interest (moderate involvement TV viewing condition)
• While channel-surfing (low involvement TV viewing condition)
Based on proprietary, patent-pending algorithms, Ace Metrix calculates the overall summary score of
each ad’s effectiveness (i.e., the Ace Score).
In 2010, Ace Metrix tested 263 unique nationally televised ads featuring celebrity endorsements.
2
These ads spanned 16 industries and 110 brands. All ads were tested within 48 hours of breaking
nationally thereby capturing immediate rather than “cultivated” advertising effectiveness. In addition,
3
a “control group” of non-celebrity ads was acquired for the sake of comparison.
Subsequent to airing, each advertisement was electronically captured and shown alongside a series of
other breaking ads (“a flight”) as an online survey. Survey respondents were asked to view and
evaluate each ad monadically. Respondents were recruited from an online panel with each ad test
varying in sample size between 498 and 608; invitations to participate in ad testing were stratified to
4
ensure the sample would be nationally representative.
The decisive benefit of the Ace Metrix methodology is that it provides advertisers with a metric of
relative comparison. Unlike other measures of advertising effectiveness, Ace Scores allow advertisers
to evaluate the performance of an ad in a variety of competitive settings: (i) compared with another ad;
(ii) compared with the average of all ads in our database; (iii) compared with an ad’s competitive set;
or (iv) compared with some other configuration of ads. While custom research studies are limited in
their ability to assess relative performance, Ace Scores and its components provide an opportunity for
advertisers to place their ad in any context they choose. Consequently, advertisers gain a substantial
advantage over the competition by being able to compare and contrast their ad with any other ad or
group of ads. The effect of this is that it eliminates the classic apples-to-oranges problem frequently
observed as limitation of custom research and yields scientifically-valid metrics that are unbiased and
consistent across all ads and industries.
Beyond providing a valid method for standardization and comparison, Ace Scores provide a multi-
dimensional snap shot of the immediate human response to an advertisement. Unlike simple
measures of advertising effectiveness (e.g., unaided or aided recall, likeability, etc.), Ace Score
components provide specificity about how attention-grabbing, relevant, informative, likeable, and
attitude-shaping the ad was in addition to how desirable the product was. This information is
substantial in that it allows advertisers to not only know that they created a good (or bad) ad, but
sheds light on why that ad performed positively or negatively. That is, Ace Score components explain
what worked and didn’t work.
FINDINGS
Do celebrity endorsements result in higher Ace Scores or Ace Metrix component scores?
The answer is resoundingly no. To make a fair comparison, we narrowed the list of advertisements in
5
the non-celebrity “control” group to include only the same industries included in the celebrity group.
Across the board, celebrity ads scored lower than non-celebrity ads in terms of both Ace Scores and Ace
Metrix component scores.
2
List of celebrity ads included in Appendix
3
See http://www.acemetrix.com for detailed information discussing the Ace Score
4
Ad testing began January 1, 2010 and continued up to and including December 5, 2010
5
By doing this, we eliminated the claim that results were influenced by industry not celebrity effects
7. Additionally, it is compelling to observe that the various Ace Metrix component scores (e.g., measures
of persuasion, attention, and likeability) which are all part of the underlying rationale supporting the
celebrity endorsement argument failed to show a positive effect for celebrity ads. In particular,
celebrity ads scored poorly when it comes to “Desire,” indicating that the presence of a celebrity was
associated with viewers indicating less of the attitude “I want that”—a negative result for any
advertisement. Relevance and information are where celebrity ads fell—two key drivers of ad success
according to Ace Metrix data.
Average Scores Depicted
Ace Scores are scaled to range between zero and 950
Beyond simple mean comparisons, we wondered whether variation across industries affected the
story. To determine whether varying industry norms changed whether celebrity ads were effective, we
conducted a regression analysis including both a variable for industry norms as well as an indicator
variable for whether the ad featured a celebrity or not.
The results showed that even after controlling for industry norms (which do vary across industries),
ads featuring celebrities tend to have lower Ace Scores.
An ad featuring a celebrity—on average—was rated 9 points lower than ad without a celebrity.
Furthermore, when examining the effect of celebrity ads by industry (i.e., the statistical interaction
between them) the results showed that there were only a few cases where celebrity ads outperformed
6
their counterparts. When celebrity ads did do better, the margin of difference was very small.
Certainly small enough to wonder whether such nominal gains were worth such astronomical fees.
Beyond the aggregate level, it is even more compelling that neither Ace Scores nor Ace Metrix
component scores exhibited varying patterns across gender or age groups. When evaluating average
differences between gender and age groups, there were minimal differences between demographic
categories.
Again, we considered the possibility that advertising effectiveness varied both by demography and by
industry. One way of accounting for this concern entails considering how much “lift” the ad provided
beyond its industry norm. An advertising “lift” statistic is a simple improvement calculation that
shows—in percentage terms—how much better or worse an ad did compared with its industry
competition.
Why do this? We wanted to rule out the possibility that a celebrity ad which was targeted at a certain
demographic would not be penalized in our analysis for not appealing to other demographic groups.
That is, if an ad was targeted at men, we did not want to misrepresent the effectiveness of the ad by
only considering overall lift. Rather, to be sure of our results, we examined the “celebrity effect” based
7
on lift for the top performing demographic.
6
See Appendix for the graphical depiction of the interaction between Industry and Celebrity Ads
7
This meant that the best performing demographic varied on an ad-by-ad basis.
8. The graph below shows the penalty of featuring a celebrity in a televised advertisement among viewers
in the ads most receptive demographic. To be clear—on average— having a celebrity in an ad
detracted from the ad’s effectiveness compared to the industry average by 1 percent among the
8 9 10
demographic target the ad most appealed to. Consequently this rules out the claim that targeting
was responsible for poor celebrity performance. In fact, celebrity endorsements hurt product
advertisements even among target markets. In sum, regardless of gender or age, advertisements
without celebrities out-performed advertisements with them.
ARE ALL CELEBRITIES EQUAL? DO SOME PERFORM BETTER THAN REST?
Across the board, the celebrity with the best performance was Oprah Winfrey. Each of Oprah Winfrey’s
three ads performed highly across gender and age groups. Because Ace Scores are standardized,
they are comparable on an ad-by-ad basis.
Moreover, Oprah’s lift was spectacular. Insurance is an industry that suffers from a relatively low
industry norm – consequently each of Oprah’s ads performed well not just in an absolute sense (i.e.,
across all ads) but particularly in a relative sense (i.e., among all 2010 insurance ads).
Although Oprah's performance is commendable, it’s noteworthy that we cannot fully attribute the
success of the ads she was in to her celebrity alone. That is, each of the three ads that Oprah was
featured in was a “cause-themed” ad, meaning that it included a PSA-type of message; in this case,
advocating against unsafe driving practices (“texting while driving”).
Because Oprah Winfrey did not appear in any product endorsement ads, it is difficult to say with
certainty whether her celebrity is responsible for her strong performance or whether something else is
responsible. Unfortunately, there are so few “cause-themed” ads that testing this claim reliably is
difficult.
8
This difference is statistically significant.
9
It should be intuitive that the average for the Non-Celebrity group is zero (i.e., because the size of the non-Celebrity sub
group is both large and accounts for 91 percent of the overall sample)
10
To be absolutely certain of our claim, we examined a series of cosmetics ads featuring celebrities among women of all ages.
While the ads were slightly better received among women than men, there was still a negative celebrity effect with each ad
scoring below the cosmetics industry average.
9. How did the other celebrities do?
Oprah aside, it is remarkable that so few celebrity ads were able to considerably impact viewer
perceptions beyond industry norms. Of the 263 celebrity ads tested, only 31 exceeded 10 percent lift.
In other words, only 31 celebrity ads did better than 10 percent above their respective industry
average.
TOP CELEBRITY ADS BY LIFT
Celebrity Brand Ad Title Lift
Oprah Winfrey Liberty Mutual Auto Insurance Think You Can Text And Drive? 34%
Ed Burns ishares (AUG) Ed Burns Swallows Camera 28%
Oprah Progressive Matthew Wilhound Killed By Cellphone User 24%
Oprah Winfrey Progressive Distracted Driving 22%
Carl Weathers Bud Light Bud Light Playbook 18%
George Strait Wrangler National Patriot Program 17%
Troy Polamalu Head & Shoulders Troy Polamalu Uses Teammate's Shampoo 17%
Mulitple Celebrities Macy's Everything Is Better At Macy's 16%
Peyton Manning & Justin Timberlake Sony Televisions Peyton Manning & Justin Timberlake 16%
Jason Alexander Jenny Craig Jason Alexander Wants To Lose 30 Pounds 16%
Carl Weathers Bud Light The Ultimate Tailgate Car 16%
Troy Polamalu Head & Shoulders Hair Causes Shadow 15%
Tim Mcgraw Betty Crocker Meals Help Feeding America 15%
Snoop Dogg Pepsi Snoop Dogg Performs In Grocery Store 15%
Ray Lewis Old Spice Deodorant Bear Chases Ray Lewis 15%
Dr. Dre HP Hardware Laptop With Built In Beats 15%
Jason Alexander Jenny Craig Lost 30 Lbs 14%
Freida Pinto L'Oreal Skin Freida Pinto Comes Clean 13%
Troy Polamalu Head & Shoulders Embarrassing Ringtone 13%
Terry Crews Old Spice Soap Powerful Odor Blocking Wash 13%
Holly Robinson Peete Colgate Always On Call 12%
Bear Grylls Degree Take On My Sport 12%
Morgan Freeman Visa Super Bowl For Life 11%
Danny McBride & Patrick Willis On The Track K-swiss On The Track 11%
Troy Palumalu Head & Shoulders Palumolecules 11%
Jason Alexander Jenny Craig Pick Up And Call Today 11%
Nick Cannon Pepsi Pepsico Feeds America 11%
Eric Clapton T-Mobile Wireless Eric Clapton Plays On Fender Edition Phone 11%
Taylor Swift Sony Cameras Capturing All Fans In One Shot 10%
Alicia Keyes Samsung Cameras Two Screens One Dream 10%
Giada De Laurentiis Target Giada My Line Is Just Like My Cooking 10%
A casual glance at the list of top performing celebrity ads shows that other than Oprah Winfrey
(average lift was 27 percent), repeated successes were limited to Carl Weathers for Bud Light
(average lift was 17 percent), Troy Polamalu for Head & Shoulders (average lift was 14%) , and Jason
11
Alexander for Jenny Craig (average lift was 8 percent).
While Weathers scored well overall, he was more favored by men than women. Weathers scored 25
percent and 19 percent above the Alcoholic Beverages industry norm for his two Bud Light ads among
men aged 36 to 49; and 12 percent and 11 percent above the industry norm for men aged 21 to 35.
Conversely, Polamalu’s four ads for Head & Shoulders each performed above the 10 percent
threshold point as well but what is particularly interesting about them is the lack of polarity in audience
response. Similarly, while Alexander’s ads were more favored by women than men the difference
between genders was even less pronounced.
11
Interestingly, while Jason Alexander’s ads for Jenny Craig did do better among older women and worse among younger men,
the level of polarity between these demographic groups across all Jenny Craig ads was not large indicating that Alexander
appeals to a wide audience.
10. To be clear, it is apparent that most successful celebrity ads did not merely appeal to a single target
audience but appealed across all the greater, wider audience.
While Winfrey, Weathers, Polamalu, and Alexander are success stories, there is not much systematic
evidence of consistent celebrity appeal beyond these four. Take Peyton Manning for example.
12
Manning appeared in eight ads in 2010 including the celebrity ad with the highest Ace Score. While
it’s tempting to identify Peyton Manning as a positive case, the evidence does not demonstrate that he
consistently performs well. Manning appeared in two ads that had decent lift (“Fans Are Priceless” for
MasterCard with a 10% overall lift and with Justin Timberlake for Sony with a 16% lift). However,
Manning also appeared in six other ads with less-than-impressive lift.
Manning’s Inconsistent Performance: Plusses and Minuses
Brand Ad Title Lift
Sony Televisions Peyton Manning & Justin Timberlake 16%
Mastercard Peyton Manning: Fans Are Priceless 10%
Sony Televisions Peyton Manning: Helping Move Products 2%
Reebok Mens Footwear Peyton Manning: Energy Boost For Your Feet 2%
General Mills Wheaties Fuel Peyton Manning: Winning Takes Preparation 0%
Gatorade Peyton Manning: The After -1%
Oreo Manning Brothers Win Against The Trumps -7%
General Mills Wheaties Fuel Peyton Manning: An '84 Classic -11%
Combined, Manning’s performance led to a paltry 1.5 percent lift average. When examining
Manning’s performance across gender and age breaks, the story does not change. By and large,
Peyton Manning failed to consistently appeal.
The Year’s Worst Celebrity Performances
Despite Peyton Manning’s lackluster performance, most of his advertisements either equaled industry
norms or bettered them (the big exception was Manning’s Wheaties: “An ’84 Classic”). Relatively
speaking, Manning sits at the front of the class with Oprah Winfrey. However, the most interesting view
of celebrity endorsement ads focuses on the back of the room where, in fact, most celebrities sit.
Altogether 52 ads (one fifth of all celebrity ads tested) yielded negative lift scores in excess of 10
percent. Tiger Woods, Dale Earnhardt Jr., Diddy, Lance Armstrong, Kenny Mayne, Jamie Lee Curtus,
Andie MacDowell, Joe Montana, and Rachel Zoe (the “multiple offenders”) each had multiple ads that
resulted in Ace Scores below industry norms.
Among the “multiple offenders” category, the ads tended to exhibit minimal variation across both age
and gender groups indicating uniform rejection. The absolute worst performer (as was likely
forecasted by Gillette, Accenture, AT&T, and Gatorade) was Tiger Woods. Collectively, Woods’ two ads
averaged 23 percent below the industry average (i.e., negative lift or “sink”) and was equally
unreceptive among men, women, young, and older viewers. While it is relatively easy to speculate why
viewers rated ads featuring Tiger Woods poorly, it is a greater challenge to understand why the rest of
the “multiple offenders” group failed to capitalize on their celebrity status.
12
Two
of
Manning’s
ads
featured
other
celebrities:
(1)
Eli
Manning
and
Donald
Trump;
and
(2)
Justin
Timberlake
11. WORST CELEBRITY LIFT
Celebrity Brand Ad Title Lift
Tiger Woods Nike General Footwear Tiger Woods: Did You Learn Anything -30%
Lance Armstrong Radio Shack Lance Armstrong: No Emoticons -28%
Kenny Mayne Gillette Shaving Mayne: Good Segment -28%
Dale Earnhard Jr. Nationwide Auto Insurance D. Earnhardt Jr: Coverage At Right Price -27%
Donald Trump Macy's Donald Trump: Making Timmy A Mogul -24%
Jamie Lee Curtis Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Mary Ellen Smith -22%
Martha Stewart Macy's Martha Stewart Wakes Men Up With Horn -21%
Andie MacDowell L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie MacDowell: Proven Results -21%
Diddy Ciroc Diddy: Change Your Name -21%
Megan Mullally I Cant Believe Its Not Butter Megan Mullally: People Singing About Taste -21%
Drew Barrymore Cover Girl Drew Barrymore: Get Your Look On Track -20%
Jamie Lee Curtis Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Woman Became Sluggish -18%
Charles Barkley Taco Bell SB 10: It Rocks, It Rocks, Featuring Charles Barkley -18%
Dwayne Wade Nike Mens Footwear Dwayne Wade: Nightmares Never Sleep -18%
C. Georgio Toyota C. Georgio Interviews Brad On Red Carpet -18%
Tiger Woods EA Video Games - Sports Tiger Woods: PGA 11 -18%
Alex Trebek DirecTV Alex Trebek: The Most HD Channels -17%
Lance Armstrong Radio Shack Lance Armstrong: Power The Mobile Universe -17%
Rachel Zoe Bing.com Rachel Zoe: Beach Vacation -16%
Julia Roberts Lancome Julia Roberts: Unforgettable Eyes -16%
Diane Keaton L'Oreal Cosmetics Diane Keaton: Nourished Skin -16%
Chad Johnson godaddy.com Chad Johnson Wants To Be Number One -16%
Linda Evangelista L'Oreal Cosmetics Linda Evangelista: Thanks To A Lipstick -16%
Kenny Mayne Gillette Shaving Kenny Mayne: Close Ups -16%
Andie MacDowell L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie McDowell Notes How She Knows It Works -16%
Doug Flutie Capital One Doug Flutie: Mascot Video Challenge -15%
Conan O'Brien American Express Conan O'brien: A Serious Applause Sign -15%
Snookie Wonderful Pistachios Snookie Does It With Uv Rays -15%
Danny McBride K-swiss Danny McBride: Sound Of Muscles Getting Super Big -15%
Diddy Ciroc Smooth Talk With Diddy -15%
Terry Crews Old Spice Deodorant Terry Crews: Double Sun Power -14%
Sydney Crosby Reebok Mens Apparel Sydney Crosby's Famous Dryer -14%
Jamie Lee Curtis Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Emily Illick -14%
Drew Brees EA Video Games - Sports Drew Brees Celebrates Cover -14%
Sarah Jessica Parker Garnier Skin Sarah Jessica Parker: Defy Gravity -14%
Marie Osmond Nutrisystem Marie Osmond: Let's Do Lunch/814-thin -14%
Rachel Zoe Bing.com Rachel Zoe Needs A Break -13%
Jessica Alba Revlon Jessica Alba: Love At First Swipe -13%
Jane Krakowski Tropicana Jane Krakowski Has A Broken Heart -13%
Joe Montana Skechers Men's Footwear Man Interviews Joe Montana -13%
Frieda Pinto L'Oreal Cosmetics Frieda Pinto: First Lash Boosting Serum -12%
Andie MacDowell L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie MacDowell: Ingredients To Prove Results -12%
Rod Blagojevich Wonderful Pistachios Rod Blagojevich: Lowest Calorie Nut -12%
Halle Berry Revlon Halle Berry: Lips Stay Perfect -11%
Luke Wilson AT&T Wireless Luke Wilson: Man Gets Map In Soup -11%
Dale Earnhard Jr. Hellmanns Dale Earnhardt Jr.: It Takes Real Food -11%
Joe Montana Skechers Mens Footwear Joe Montana: My New Perspective -11%
Rachel Zoe Bing.com Rachel Zoe: Where To Stay -11%
Derek Jeter Gillette Shaving Derek Jeter Surprises Man In Bathroom -11%
Venus Williams Tide Venus Williams: Your Style Is Always Fresh -11%
Peyton Manning General Mills Wheaties Fuel Peyton Manning: An '84 Classic -11%
Diddy Ciroc Diddy: Smooth Talk -11%
12. WHY WERE THESE ADS SO INEFFECTIVE?
After we quantified advertising effectiveness via Ace Scores and Ace Metrix component scores, we
asked respondents to provide open-ended feedback about the ads they viewed. The idea here was to
better zero-in on the ‘why’ question. Why did viewers dislike these ads so much?
The most common themes among the worst celebrity ads were: (a) confusion about what product the
celebrity was endorsing; (b) evaluating the ad as boring; and (c) dislike of the celebrity.
Cases in point: Lance Armstrong’s No Emoticons ad for Radio Shack never actually mentioned the
name “Radio Shack” in the ad nor did it prominently display any storefront shots, aisle shots, or
electronic devices. A typical open-ended response from a viewer indicated that she “Had no clue what
they were advertising until the Radio Shack sign comes up” [at the end of the ad]. Similarly, Conan
O’Brien’s ad for American Express garnered remarks like “What in the world was it about in the first
place? I don’t have a clue.”
Likewise, Diddy’s Change Your Name ad for Ciroc vodka never discussed the actual product in terms
of taste, comparison to competitors, or cost. One respondent observed “It didn’t really tell me about
the product. If it did it wasn’t that clear.” Not surprisingly, the Information component score for this ad
was a mere 442 (22 percent below the overall Information norm and 8 percent below the Alcoholic
Beverages norm).
Likewise, Dale Earnhardt Jr.’s ad for Nationwide Auto Insurance demonstrates this point as well. One
respondent offered: “This ad was too silly and did not really sell me anything. It tried too hard to be
funny and missed the mark.”
Beyond not clearly emphasizing the product, the worst celebrity ads elicited reactions from viewers
indicating boredom and “don’t like him (her)” which, in and of themselves, are ad-killers.
13. Conclusion
What can be learned about celebrity advertisements from this study?
Although it is widely believed that getting a celebrity endorsement is a simple, effective way to
increase advertising effectiveness, this study—which examined more than 2,600 advertisements—
indicates otherwise. The mere presence of a celebrity is not associated with positive results. In fact,
among both the overall viewing audience as well as among targeted audiences, the presence of a
celebrity in an ad was associated with lower overall Ace Scores and negative industry lift (or “sink”).
As with many longstanding beliefs with respect to advertising, many do not stand up to empirical
scrutiny. Further, perhaps the consumer is changing. Celebrity ads scored lower on key dimensions of
“Relevance,” “Desire,” and “Information”— key elements of ad persuasion. It may be that
contemporary consumers are not buying simply because someone tells them to.
The effect of this is considerable given the large talent fees and potentially damaging long-term
relationships established between corporations and celebrities. This is not to mention the opportunity
cost associated with such easy-to-make but perhaps not-so-wise long-term advertising decisions.
Despite this, we are not arguing that celebrity advertising is altogether ineffective. Celebrity
endorsements can be quite compelling given the right creative and contextual conditions. Certainly
there are numerous success stories featuring the right blend of creative advertising, appropriate
product information, and celebrity endorsement. As observed earlier, Oprah Winfrey, Carl Weathers,
and Jason Alexander consistently performed well bringing positive lift to the products they endorsed.
Rather, our goal here is to demonstrate that celebrity ads—in general—are not effective.
Key factors for celebrity ads to be successful entail maintaining relevance and information levels. In
our data, celebrities used for a purpose other than to sell a product, such as charity or public service
connected well with viewers. Other creative uses of celebrity, such as Aretha Franklin playing a diva in
a popular Snickers ad show that humor and a “tongue-in-cheek” view of celebrity status resonated
well. In a similar vein, Troy Polamalu’s ads for Head & Shoulders—which poked fun at Polamalu’s
concern with his hair—resonated across a wide audience.
Generally speaking, decisions about advertising are made relatively quickly. Back-of-the-envelope
calculations, quick marginal tallies, and heuristics about what works and what doesn’t work are part of
most advertising executives’ playbook. While the impact of celebrity product endorsements is a
potentially good idea, attention to all the components of an ad are necessary in order for the ad to be a
success. In that vein, celebrity ads will only be effective in the right context. While this increases the
complexity required of decision-makers, it is word-to-the-wise that celebrity endorsements are not a
panacea.
14. References
Associated Press. “Sponsors Wrangler, Snapper Stick With Brett Favre.” Fox11online.com.
December 30, 2010
Crutchfield, D. “Celebrity Endorsements Still Push Product: Why in the Era of Social Media, the
Rewards Continue To Outweigh the Risks”. Ad Age. September 22, 2010.
Skidmore, S. “Gillette Won’t Renew Contract With Tiger Woods”. Yahoo!Finance.
December 23, 2010.
Wayne, T. “In Online Ads, Celebrities Fall Short”. The New York Times. December 19,
2010.
15. APPENDIX: LIST OF ADS
Industry Category Brand Ad Title
Financial Investment ishares (AUG) Ed Burns Swallows Camera
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Activate Anytime Anywhere
Personal Care Skin Garnier Skin Alana De La Garza: Still Cleansing With All This?
Packaged Foods Cereals Wheaties Albert Pujols: Only One Of Us Will Win
Telecommunications Television Services DirecTV Alex Trebek: The Most HD Channels
Technology Cameras Samsung Cameras Alicia Keyes: Two Screens One Dream
Personal Care Skin L'Oreal Skin Andie MacDowell: Clinically Proven Results
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie MacDowell: Ingredients To Prove Results
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie Macdowell: Promise Results
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie MacDowell: Proven Results
Personal Care Skin L'Oreal Skin Andie MacDowell: Redefine Face Contours & Neck
Personal Care Skin L'Oreal Skin Andie MacDowell: Reverse The Signs
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Andie McDowell Notes How She Knows It Works
Technology Computer Hardware HP Hardware Annie Leibovitz: Freud's Couch
Technology Cameras Nikon Ashton Kutcher Plays Photographer
Technology Cameras Nikon Ashton Takes Picture Of Girl
Personal Care Deodorant Old Spice Deodorant Bear Chases Ray Lewis
Personal Care Deodorant Degree Bear Grylls: Take On My Sport
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Coffee & Tea Snapple Better Stuff & Donald Trump With Nerds
Technology Video Games Nintendo Video Games - Family Beyonce & Stylist Plays Style Savvy
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Beyonce: Color Stays Perfect
Personal Care Hair L'Oreal Hair Beyonce: The Shimmer I Want
Retail Discount Stores Sears Brett Favre: Are You A Sportsman?
Retail Discount Stores Sears Brett Favre: See You In Miami Maybe
Retail Discount Stores Sears Brett Favre: Still Has It In Him
Retail Discount Stores Sears Brett Favre: The Arts Is His Thing
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Wrangler Brett Favre's Wrangler Story
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Wrangler Brett Favre's Wrangler Story
Retail Department Stores Kohls Britney Spears New Fasion Line
Technology Video Games Knowledge Kids Brook Burke: Get Moving Family Fitness
Personal Care Dental Colgate Brooke Shields: Job Requirement/-new
Automotive Non-Luxury Auto Toyota C. Georgio Interviews Brad On Red Carpet
Personal Care Skin Olay C.underwood: Cleanser's Job
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Carl Edward, Kasey Kahne & Denny Hamlin: Sasquatch
Beverages - Alcoholic Beer Bud Light Carl Weathers: Bud Light Playbook
Beverages - Alcoholic Beer Bud Light Carl Weathers: The Ultimate Tailgate Car
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Carmello Anthony: Here We Go Again
Retail Department Stores Macy's Celebrities: Everything Is Better At Macy's
Technology Websites godaddy.com Chad Johnson Wants To Be Number One
Candies & snacks Snacks Wonderful Pistachios Chad Ochocinco: Does It In The End Zone
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Reebok Mens Footwear Chad Ochocinco: Energy Drink For Your Feet
Restaurants & QSR QSR Taco Bell Charles Barkley: Lots In The Box That Rocks
Candies & snacks Snacks Wonderful Pistachios Charlie Brown And Lucy Do It For Kicks
Personal Care Deodorant Right Guard Chris Paul Blocks Player's Shot
Personal Care Deodorant Right Guard Chris Paul Protects With Defense
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Clint Bowyer & Denny Hamling: A Bigger Team
Financial Credit Cards American Express Conan O'brien: A Serious Applause Sign
Financial Credit Cards American Express Conan O'brien: Serious About Entertainment
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Craig Robinson Watches A Yankee Game
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Cristiano Ronaldo Writes His Own Future
Insurance Auto Insurance Nationwide Auto Insurance D. Earnhardt Jr: Coverage At Right Price
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda 7 Up D.spade Moves Into His New House
Packaged Foods Staples Hellmanns Dale Earnhardt Jr.: It Takes Real Food
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Wrangler Dale Earnhardt Jr's A Wrangler Guy
Apparel & Footwear Footwear K-swiss Danny McBride & Patrick Willis On The Track
Apparel & Footwear Footwear K-swiss Danny McBride: Jump Rope
Apparel & Footwear Footwear K-swiss Danny McBride: Sound Of Muscles Getting Super Big
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda 7 Up David Spade's Neighbor Wants To Swim
Personal Care Skin Clean & Clear Demi Lovato: A Massive Movement
Personal Care Skin Clean & Clear Demi Lovato: Get Energized & Get Going
Personal Care Skin Clean & Clear Demi Lovato: Join The Surge
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Dennis Haysbert: Accident Forgiveness
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Dennis Haysbert: An Agent Saves You Money
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Dennis Haysbert: No Cookie Cutter Policies
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Dennis Haysbert: Some Take Forever To Pay
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Dennis Haysbert: Switching Car Insurance
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Auto Insurance Dennis Haysbert: Time To Switch To Allstate
Insurance Auto Insurance Allstate Dennis Haysbert: Truth About Safe Drivers
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Derek Jeter Surprises Man In Bathroom
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Derek Jeter: Ready For The Challenge
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Diane Keaton: Nourished Skin
Beverages - Alcoholic Liquor Ciroc Diddy: Change Your Name
Technology Cameras Cisco Flip Diddy: Last Train To Paris
Beverages - Alcoholic Liquor Ciroc Diddy: Smooth Talk
Retail Department Stores Macy's Donald Trump: Making Timmy A Mogul
Financial Credit Cards Capital One Doug Flutie: Mascot Video Challenge
Technology Computer Hardware HP Hardware Dr. Dre
Technology Computer Hardware HP Hardware Dr. Dre: Laptop With Built In Beats
Personal Care Dental Crest Dr. Oz: Unclogging Your Arteries
Technology Cameras Kodak Cameras Drake And Pitbull Send Pictures
Personal Care Cosmetics Cover Girl Drew Barrrymore With Cover Girl
Personal Care Cosmetics Cover Girl Drew Barrymore: Get Your Look On Track
Personal Care Cosmetics Cover Girl Drew Barrymore: How Do You Rock Your Cover Girl
Personal Care Cosmetics Cover Girl Drew Barrymore: Volume & Length
Technology Video Games EA Video Games - Sports Drew Brees Celebrates Cover
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda Pepsi Drew Brees Helps Cancer Patients
Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Nyquil Drew Brees Is Snoring
Technology Cameras Cisco Flip Drew Brees: Drew's Day Off
Pharmaceutical Pharmaceutical Dayquil Drew Brees: No Sick Days In The NFL
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Dwayne Wade & Kevin Hart: Dominate Another Day
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Dwayne Wade: Nightmares Never Sleep
Restaurants & QSR QSR McDonald's Dwight Howard & Lebron James: The Showdown
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Sports Drinks Gatorade Dwight Howard: The Original
Telecommunications Telecom Services T-Mobile Wireless Eric Clapton Plays On Fender Edition Phone
Personal Care Hair L'Oreal Hair Eva Longoria: Beautiful Radiant Color
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Eva Longoria: Maxed Up And Multiplied Out
Personal Care Hair L'Oreal Hair Evangeline Lilly: 10 Minutes Fades Away Gray
Personal Care Hair L'Oreal Hair Evangeline Lilly: Irresistible Shine
16. Industry Category Brand Ad Title
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Feliz Sao Robinho: Write The Future
Personal Care Skin L'Oreal Skin Freida Pinto Comes Clean
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Frieda Pinto: First Lash Boosting Serum
Personal Care Skin Neutrogena Skin Gabrielle Union: Shine
Candies & snacks Candy & Gum Snickers Candy & Gum Game
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Wrangler George Strait: National Patriot Program
Retail Discount Stores Target Giada My Line Is Just Like My Cooking
Personal Care Hair Dove Hair Gretta Monahan Looks At Lea Michele's Hair
Personal Care Cosmetics Revlon Halle Barry: Find Your Perfect Light
Personal Care Cosmetics Revlon Halle Berry: Lips Stay Perfect
Personal Care Skin Neutrogena Skin Hayden Panettiere: Hands Down
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Hedi Klum: Give Hope With Every Cup
Personal Care Dental Colgate Holly Robinson Peete: Always On Call
Technology Video Games EA Video Games - Sports J. Ferrera & K. Dillion: Valet Drivers
Personal Care Cosmetics Neutrogena Cosmetics J. Khoury: Promises To Make Skin Younger
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers General Footwear J. Montana: Wear Shape-ups Everyday
Technology Televisions Sony Televisions J. Nantz & P.manning: Internet Hdtv
Personal Care Skin Avon Jacqueline Bisset Doesn't Lie About Age
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis Discusses The Holidays
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Dessert Is The Best Part
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Emily Illick
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Junk Food On The Go
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Mary Ellen Smith
Packaged Foods Dairy Dannon Jamie Lee Curtis: Woman Became Sluggish
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Juice Tropicana Jane Krakowski Has A Broken Heart
Restaurants & QSR QSR Subway Jared And Athletes Say What They Like For Breakfast
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Jenny Craig Jason Alexander & Valerie Bertinelli: Lost 5 Lbs
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Jenny Craig Jason Alexander Lost 15 Pounds In 5 Weeks
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Jenny Craig Jason Alexander Lost 20 Pounds
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Jenny Craig Jason Alexander Wants To Lose 30 Pounds
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Jenny Craig Jason Alexander: Lost 30 Lbs
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Jenny Craig Jason Alexander: Pick Up And Call Today
Personal Care Skin Neutrogena Skin Jennifer Garner Was Not Good To Her Skin
Personal Care Soap Dove Soap Jennifer Gets Ready To Perform
Personal Care Cosmetics Revlon Jessica Alba: Love At First Swipe
Personal Care Cosmetics Revlon Jessica Alba: Staying Power
Personal Care Cosmetics Revlon Jessica Biel: Have You Ever Been Bitten?
Personal Care Cosmetics Revlon Jessica Biel: Lashes Grow Stronger
Personal Care Soap Dove Soap Joe Girardi: Journey To Comfort
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Joe Montana: All My Life
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Mens Footwear Joe Montana: My New Perspective
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Joe Montana: On Your Feet Alot You Can Benefit
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving John Cena: Are You Ready
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Reebok Mens Footwear John Wall Wears Them When He Plays
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Reebok Mens Footwear John Wall: Coming Fall 2010 For Basketball
Packaged Foods Meals Healthy Choice Julia & Jane: Being A Spokesperson
Packaged Foods Meals Healthy Choice Julia Louis-Dreyfus' Thoughts On Commercial
Personal Care Cosmetics Lancome Julia Roberts: Unforgettable Eyes
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear K. Malone: New Work Out Partner
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Karl Malone & Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Back/size
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Karl Malone & Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: Coming Back
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Karl Malone & Kareem Abdul-Jabbar: The Return :15
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Karl Malone's New Workout Partner
Personal Care Cosmetics Almay Kate Hudson: My Eyes
Personal Care Cosmetics Almay Kate Hudson: Smart Shade
Household Appliances Electrolux Kelly Ripa: Birthday Parties Are Amazing
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Ken Griffey Jr.: Goodbye Baseball
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Kenny Mayne: Close Ups
Technology Computer Hardware Logitech Kevin Bacon
Technology Video Games 2K Sports Kobe Bryant: He's Back
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Kobe's Many Rings
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Kobe's Shoe Is Too Hot
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Kyle Busch & Ryan Newman: Mullets Are Back
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Kyle Busch: Young Guns Crash Wedding
Retail Other Stores Radio Shack Lance Armstrong: Less Noise More Poise
Retail Other Stores Radio Shack Lance Armstrong: No 'call Me' Voicemails
Retail Other Stores Radio Shack Lance Armstrong: No Emoticons
Retail Other Stores Radio Shack Lance Armstrong: Power The Mobile Universe
Beverages - Alcoholic Beer Michelob Ultra Light Lance Armstrong: The Ultra Life
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Energy Drinks Frs Lance Armstrong: What's His Secret
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike General Footwear Lebron: What Should I Do
Candies & snacks Snacks Wonderful Pistachios Lewis Black Does It Like Lewis Black
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Linda Evangelista: Thanks To A Lipstick
Telecommunications Telecom Services AT&T Wireless Luke Wilson Sheds Light On The Subject
Telecommunications Telecom Services AT&T Wireless Luke Wilson: Barry Has Presentation Today
Telecommunications Telecom Services AT&T Wireless Luke Wilson: Innocent Family Dinner
Telecommunications Telecom Services AT&T Wireless Luke Wilson: Man Gets Map In Soup
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Skechers Men's Footwear Man Interviews Joe Montana
Candies & snacks Cookies Oreo Manning Brothers Win Against The Trumps
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Juice Mott's Marcia Cross: Mom Does Magic
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Nutrisystem Marie Osmond: Let's Do Lunch/814-thin
Health & Fitness Health & Fitness Nutrisystem Marie Osmond: Overwhelming
Personal Care Hair Clairol Marie Robinson: Perfect Color In 10 Minutes
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda Pepsi Mark Sanchez Plays Football With Pepsi 2 Liter
Retail Department Stores Macy's Martha Stewart Wakes Men Up With Horn
Personal Care Shaving Gillette Shaving Mayne: Good Segment
Packaged Foods Dairy I Cant Believe Its Not Butter Megan Mullally: People Singing About Taste
Technology Video Games 2K Sports Michael Jordan Wants To Play In This Era
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Hanes Michael Jordan: Bacon Neck
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Hanes Michael Jordan: Look Feel And Sell Good
Technology Video Games 2K Sports Michael Jordan: What If
Personal Care Cosmetics L'Oreal Cosmetics Milla Jovovich: New Anti-aging Eye Tool
Financial Credit Cards Visa Morgan Freeman: Super Bowl For Life
Automotive Non-Luxury Auto Toyota Never Know Who You'll See: Erik Estrada
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda Pepsi Nick Cannon: Pepsico Feeds America
Insurance Auto Insurance Progressive Oprah Winfrey: Distracted Driving
Insurance Auto Insurance Liberty Mutual Auto Insurance Oprah Winfrey: Think You Can Text And Drive?
Insurance Auto Insurance Progressive Oprah: Matthew Wilhound Killed By Cellphone User
Technology Video Games EA Video Games - Family Ozzy Osbourne: Scream
17. Industry Category Brand Ad Title
Technology Televisions Sony Televisions Peyton Manning & Justin Timberlake
Packaged Foods Cereals General Mills Wheaties Fuel Peyton Manning: An '84 Classic
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Reebok Mens Footwear Peyton Manning: Energy Boost For Your Feet
Financial Credit Cards Mastercard Peyton Manning: Fans Are Priceless
Technology Televisions Sony Televisions Peyton Manning: Helping Move Products
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Sports Drinks Gatorade Peyton Manning: The After
Packaged Foods Cereals General Mills Wheaties Fuel Peyton Manning: Winning Takes Preparation
Personal Care Cosmetics Cover Girl Queen Latifah: Lightweight Coverage That Really Fits
Candies & snacks Snacks Wonderful Pistachios R. Lee Ermey: Drill Sergeants Do It With Intimidation
Technology Websites Bing.com Rachel Zoe Needs A Break
Technology Websites Bing.com Rachel Zoe: Beach Vacation
Technology Websites Bing.com Rachel Zoe: New York Trip
Technology Websites Bing.com Rachel Zoe: Where To Stay
Personal Care Deodorant Old Spice Deodorant Ray Lewis Eats A Universe
Personal Care Soap Old Spice Soap Ray Lewis Rides Rocket Powered Crow
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Rick Ross At The Jewelry Store
Technology Cameras Kodak Cameras Rihanna Takes Photos At Fashion Show
Candies & snacks Snacks Wonderful Pistachios Rod Blagojevich: Lowest Calorie Nut
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Ronaldo
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Ronaldo Imagines His Place In The Future
Financial Credit Cards Rushcard Russell Simmons: You Can't Go Into Debt
Personal Care Dental Scope Ryan Seacrest: Fresh Minty Ready
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike General Footwear S. Richards & D. Jackson: You Ready
Technology Video Games Ubisoft Video Games - Family S. White: Skateboarding Down A Building
Personal Care Skin Garnier Skin Sarah Jessica Parker: Defy Gravity
Automotive Non-Luxury Auto Hyundai Non-Luxury Auto SB 10: 10 Years Strong - Featuring Brett Favre
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda Dr. Pepper Soda SB 10: Dr Love - Little Kiss
Restaurants & QSR QSR Taco Bell SB 10: It Rocks, It Rocks, Featuring Charles Barkley
Technology Mobile Devices Motorola SB 10: Motorola Featuring Megan Fox
Apparel & Footwear Footwear K-swiss Shockey & McBride: Set Records
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Reebok Mens Apparel Sidney Crosby Wins Another Shootout
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Reebok Mens Footwear Sidney Crosby: Energy For Your Feet
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Reebok Mens Footwear Sidney Crosby's Energy Drink For Feet
Beverages - Alcoholic Liquor Ciroc Smooth Talk With Diddy
Candies & snacks Snacks Wonderful Pistachios Snookie Does It With Uv Rays
Technology Video Games EA Video Games - Family Snoop Dogg Greatest Hits
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Adidas Snoop Dogg In The Star Wars Cantina
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda Pepsi Snoop Dogg Performs In Grocery Store
Personal Care Hair Pantene Stacy London: Smart Beauty
Personal Care Hair Pantene Stacy London: Weak Fly Aways Get Smooth
Technology Websites KGB Stephen & William Baldwin: Jump Out Of A Plane
Beverages - Non Alcoholic Soda Pepsi SuChin Pak & Wale: NYC Ideas On The Street
Beverages - Alcoholic Beer Bud Light Swat Team Commandeers Beer
Apparel & Footwear Apparel Reebok Mens Apparel Sydney Crosby's Famous Dryer
Personal Care Hair Head & Shoulders T. Polamalu: Hair Causes Shadow
Personal Care Hair Head & Shoulders T.polamalu: Embarrassing Ringtone
Candies & snacks Snacks Wheat Thins Tabitha Gets A Visit
Technology Cameras Sony Cameras Taylor Swift: Capturing All Fans In One Shot
Personal Care Deodorant Old Spice Deodorant Terry Crews: Double Sun Power
Personal Care Soap Old Spice Soap Terry Crews: Powerful Odor Blocking Wash
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike General Footwear Tiger Woods: Did You Learn Anything
Technology Video Games EA Video Games - Sports Tiger Woods: PGA 11
Packaged Foods Meals Betty Crocker Meals Tim Mcgraw: Help Feeding America
Technology Cameras Kodak Cameras Trey Songs Takes Pictures
Technology Cameras Kodak Cameras Trey Songz And Pitbull: Beautiful Women
Personal Care Hair Head & Shoulders Troy Palumalu: Palumolecules
Personal Care Hair Head & Shoulders Troy Polamalu Uses Teammate's Shampoo
Apparel & Footwear Footwear K-swiss Urijah Faber Almost Gets A Death Blow From Danny McBride
Apparel & Footwear Footwear K-swiss Urijah Faber and Danny McBride Shoes Switch When He Jumps
Household Laundry Tide Venus Williams: Your Style Is Always Fresh
Household Laundry Tide Venus Williams: Your Style Is Always Fresh
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Voices In Lance Armstrong's Head
Telecommunications Telecom Services Verizon Wireless Wayne Gretzky: He Has Every Record
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear Wayne Rooney
Apparel & Footwear Footwear Nike Mens Footwear World Cup: Ronaldo
Candies & snacks Snacks Ritz Wyclef Jean: Block Party Having Fun
18. APPENDIX II: CELEBRITY AD PERFORMANCE BY INDUSTRY
Celebrity
Vs.
Non-‐Celebrity
Ads
By
Industry
700
Non-‐Celebrity
A ds
Celebrity
A ds
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Apparel
&
Footwear Automotive Beverages
-‐ Alcoholic Beverages
-‐ Non
Candies
&
s nacks Financial Health
&
Fitness Household Insurance Packaged
Foods Personal
Care Pharmaceutical Restaurants
&
QSR Retail Technology Telecommunications
Alcoholic