This document proposes strengthening parliamentary capacities through enhanced Parliamentary Research Services (PaRS) and increased political and scientific cooperation between parliaments. It recommends that PaRS take on expanded roles in areas like technology adoption, research, and consultation. Case studies demonstrate how PaRS can support digitalization, modeling of procedures, and EU-funded projects examining lawmaking and policy debates. International cooperation is presented as a means for parliaments to develop independent expertise and counter governmental influence.
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 25
More Related Content
Advancing capacities of representative institutions: a proposal
1. Advancing capacities of
representative institutions: a
proposal
Dr.-Ing. Dipl.Wirt.-Ing. Fotios Fitsilis
Head of Department
Scientific Documentation and Supervision
Scientific Service
Hellenic Parliament
1
31 August 2017
2. Contents
2
Introduction
Parliamentary Research Services (PaRS)
Political and scientific parliamentary
cooperation
Case studies of parliamentary research
Conclusions
4. Introduction 1
Paradigm shift in technology
Current discourse of a 3rd industrial
revolution
Advances in algorithms (e.g. Blockchain
Technology, Artificial Intelligence/AI) and
integrated systems (e.g. robots, drones)
Unique properties (unlike any previous
technological discoveries)
machine-learning
increasing man-machine interaction
decreasing human dependency
4
5. Introduction II
Major advantages
quicker and more effective than humans
General concerns
digital unemployment
breach of privacy
ethical implications (e.g. killer robots,
drones)
destructive and dangerous choices (e.g. b
AI/autonomous systems)
5
6. How can parliaments worldwide prepare
themselves to address such major societal and
economic challenges?
6
…and the question is ???
7. Strengthening of parliamentary capacities
through:
Adequate Parliamentary Research Services
Developments of international political and
scientific networks
7
Proposal
8. 8
Parliaments and innovation
Technology affects political behavior in
societies
Role of tradition in parliamentary operation
… tradition vs. innovation*
Parliaments have long kept technology
debates out of their agenda
The role of PaRS?
* Technological and non-
technological innovation
9. 9
Characteristics of PaRS
Research services in majority of
parliaments
Accumulation of procedural and technical
expertise
Necessity for parliamentary evolution
Innovation to strengthen…
a) administrative capacity
b) the role of Parliament in digital societies
Redefine the role of PaRS?
10. IPU
guidelines 5 key phases
(own
categorization)
13 distinct steps
Reverse
engineering
possible to
assess existing
PaRS!
10
Phase/Guideline
Phase a: Governance
1. Determine where PaRS will be located in the organization
Phase b: Define the mandate
2. Establishment and objectives
3. Identify who may access the service
4. Determine what types of services will be offered
Phase c: Determine how the research service operates
5. Adopt a Service Charter and criteria for prioritizing demands
6. Identify staff requirements
7. Establish a process for quality control
8. Secure access to a range of information sources
9. Define information management requirements
10. Establish means of promotion and evaluation
Phase d: Make the most of partnerships
11. Build partnerships within the parliamentary administration
12. Set up partnerships with other research services
Phase e: Reporting to Parliament
13. Establish ways to report to parliament
11. 11
Role of PaRS I
Project management role in the introduction
new technologies
Aggressive approach as in-house
consultancy
Coordination of parliamentary experts and
external consultants
Participation in research and/or technical
assistance consortia to acquire necessary
knowhow
12. 12
Role of PaRS II
Technology may be evolving fast, but some
facettes may not be ripe enough to enter the
parliamentary environment
Issues of privacy, confidentiality and ethics …
PaRS have to claim the role for themselves
to guide the adoption of technologies in a
controlled manner
Strengthened ties with parliamentary libraries
Reforms to strengthen the
functions of PaRS
14. Scientific networking I
5 FP7 Programmes
Partners from 11 countries
EU Twinning (GR + RS)
Efficient partnermix
Broad
distributionung 14
15. Scientific networking II
36 different partner (47 in total)
6 different sectors
5 x HeP und 3 x AUP
Universities
36%
Research
institutes
15%
Companies
26%
Parliaments
18%
Media
3%
NGOs
2%
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
GR DE UK AU NL ES BE IE IL LT FR
15
16. 16
Role of parliamentary cooperation
Governments are often reluctant to support
parliamentary independence
Development of intra-parliamentary expertise
The role of “soft” diplomacy
Cooperation needs to extend further than
mere international relations
Potentially counterbalances governmental
superiority!
A means to the strengthening
of representative institutions
17. Case studies
17
Parliamentary experience: FP7, Horizon
2020, COST and Erasmus+
Digitalization and archiving
Modeling of parliamentary procedures
Study of impact of digital leap on political
behavior
LEX-IS, +Spaces and NOMAD projects
18. Digitalization and archiving
18
HeP: image form*
House of Commons (via Hansard):
Application Programming Interface (API)**
Italian Chamber of Deputies: SPARQL RDF
query interface
German Bundestag: PDF docs
* See:
http://www.hellenicparliament.gr/Koinovouleftikos-
Elenchos/Mesa-Koinovouleutikou-
Elegxou#Anazitisi_meson_koinovouleftikou_elegxou
** See: http://theyworkforyou.com
19. Applied technologies
Pilot application in the 16th Parliamentary
period: 4507 questions
Programming languages: R/python
OCR: ABBYY FineReader ® 14
Professional
TXT handling: Notepad++™
XML editor: <oXygen/>®XML Editor
MS Excel (limitations, e.g. 32,767
chars/cell)
19
20. FP7 Programme: LEX-
IS
Web platform for public debate on draft laws
Cooperation between policy-makers and citizens on
decision-making within a Parliamentary
environment
Exchange of arguments, decision-making process
20
21. FP7 Programme:
+Spaces Policy simulation in virtual
spaces (2D & 3D)
Debate of draft laws and
measurement of
responsiveness
Development of data
crawling, mining and
evaluation technologies
21
22. FP7 Programme:
NOMAD
Web 2.0 for decision-making
Automated solutions for content
search, categorization and
visualization
22
23. Conclusions
23
International tensions and emerging
technologies pose great challenges to
national parliaments
Parliaments need to advance their capacities
to tackle contemporary and future
challenges
The proposal presented here calls for:
Strengthening PaRS
Intensifying parliamentary cooperation
(political and scientific)
Use the capacities and expertise of
25. Sources
F. Fitsilis et al. “Content reconstruction of parliamentary questions”,
SCIECONF (2017)
Fitsilis et al. “Implementing Digital Parliament Innovative Concepts for
Citizens and Policy Makers”, Human Computer Interaction International
Conference (2017)
F. Fitsilis, A. Koutsogiannis, “Strengthening the Capacity of Parliaments
through Development of Parliamentary Research Services”, Wroxton
Workshop (2017)
F. Fitsilis, D. Koryzis, “Parliamentary control of Governmental actions on the
interaction with European organs in the Hellenic Parliament and the National
Assembly of Serbia”, Online Papers on Parliamentary Democracy, PADEMIA
(2016)
LEXIS, https://www.uni-koblenz-landau.de/en/campus-
koblenz/fb4/iwvi/agvinf/projects/completedprojects/lex-is
+Spaces,
https://www.research.ibm.com/haifa/projects/imt/social/spaces.shtml
NOMAD, http://www.nomad-project.eu/
25
Editor's Notes
Big companies, such as IBM
Social networks and Parliaments
3d role playing
HeP + AUP (main users)
Non-moderated crowdsourcing
Policy modeling + ontologies visualization one step further