Alain De Botton Essays In Love

Alain de Botton
Essays in love
1
Romantic Fatalism
1. The longing for a destiny is nowhere stronger than in our
romantic life. All too often, forced to share a bed with
those who cannot fathom our soul, can we not be excused for
believing (contrary to all the rules of our enlightened age)
that we are fated one day to run into the man or woman of our
dreams? Can we not be allowed a certain superstitious faith
that we will ultimately locate a creature who can appease our
painful yearnings? Though our prayers may never be answered,
though there may be no end to relationships marked by mutual
incomprehension, if the heavens should come to take pity on
us, then can we really be expected to attribute our encounter
with our prince or princess to a mere coincidence? Or can we
not for once escape logic and read it as nothing other than a
sign of romantic destiny?
! 2. One mid-morning in early December, with no thought of
love or stories, I was sitting in the economy section of a
British Airways jet making its way from Paris to London. We
had recently crossed the Normandy coast, where a blanket of
winter cloud had given way to an uninterrupted view of
brilliant blue waters. Bored and unable to concentrate, I had
picked up the airline magazine, passively imbibing
information on resort hotels and airport facilities. There
was something comforting about the flight, the dull
background throb of the engines, the hushed grey interior,
the candy smiles of the airline employees. A trolley carrying
a selection of drinks and snacks was making its way down the
aisle and, though I was neither hungry nor thirsty, it filled
me with the vague anticipation that meals may elicit in
aircraft.
! 3. Morbidly perhaps, the passenger on my left had taken
off her headphones in order to study the safety-instruction
card placed in the pouch in front of her. It depicted the
ideal crash, passengers alighting softly and calmly onto land

or water, the ladies taking off their high heels, the
children dexterously inflating their vests, the fuselage
still intact, the kerosene miraculously non-flammable.
! 4. 'We're all going to die if this thing screws up, so
what are these jokers on about?' asked the passenger,
addressing no one in particular.
! 'I think perhaps it reassures people,' I replied, for I
was her only audience.
! 'Mind you, it's not a bad way to go, very quick,
especially if we hit land and you're sitting in the front. I
had an uncle who died in a plane crash once. Has anyone you
know ever died like that?'
! They hadn't, but I had no time to answer for a stewardess
arrived and (unaware of the ethical doubts recently cast on
her employers) offered us lunch. I requested a glass of
orange juice and was going to decline a plate of pale
sandwiches when my travelling companion whispered to me,
'Take them anyway. I'll eat yours, I'm starving.'
! 5. She had chestnut-coloured hair, cut short so that it
left the nape of her neck exposed, and large watery green
eyes that refused to look into mine. She was wearing a blue
blouse and had placed a grey cardigan over her knees. Her
shoulders were slim, almost fragile, and the rawness of her
nails showed they were often chewed.
! 'Are you sure I'm not depriving you?'
! 'Of course not.'
! 'I'm sorry, I haven't introduced myself, my name is
Chloe,' she announced and extended her hand across the
armrest with somewhat touching formality.
! An exchange of biography followed. Chloe told me she'd
been in Paris in order to attend a trade fair. For the past
year, she'd been working as a graphic designer for a fashion
magazine in Soho. She'd studied at the Royal College of Art,
had been born in York, but moved to Wiltshire as a child, and
was now (at the age of twenty-three) living alone in a flat
in Islington.
! 6. 'I hope they haven't lost my luggage,' said Chloe as
the plane began to drop towards Heathrow. 'Don't you have
that fear, that they'll lose your luggage?'
! 'I don't think about it, but it's happened to me, twice
in fact, once in New York, and once in Frankfurt.'
! 'God, I hate travelling,' sighed Chloe, and bit the end
of her index finger. 'I hate arriving even more, I get real
arrival angst. After I've been away for a while, I always
think something terrible has happened: all my friends have

come together and decided they hate me or my cacti have
died.'
! 'You keep cacti?'
! 'Several. I went through a cactus phase a while back.
Phallic, I know, but I spent a winter in Arizona and sort of
got fascinated by them. Do you have any interesting plants?'
! 'Only an aspidistra, but I do regularly think all my
friends might hate me.'
! 7. The conversation meandered, affording us glimpses of
one another's characters, like the brief vistas one catches
on a winding mountain road--this before the wheels hit the
tarmac, the engines were thrown into reverse, and the plane
taxied towards the terminal, where it disgorged its cargo
into the crowded immigration hall. By the time I had
collected my luggage and passed through customs, I had fallen
in love with Chloe.
!
! 8. Until one is close to death, it must be difficult to
declare anyone as the love of one's life. But only shortly
after meeting her, it seemed in no way out of place to think
of Chloe in such terms. On our return to London, Chloe and I
spent the afternoon together. Then, a week before Christmas,
we had dinner in a west London restaurant and, as though it
was both the strangest and most natural thing to do, ended
the evening in bed. She spent Christmas with her family, I
went to Scotland with friends, but we found ourselves calling
one another every day - sometimes as many as five times a day
- not to say anything in particular, simply because both of
us felt we had never spoken like this to anyone before, that
all the rest had been compromise and self-deception, that
only now were we finally able to understand and make
ourselves understood--that the waiting [messianic in nature]
was truly over. I recognised in her the woman I had been
clumsily seeking all my life, a being whose qualities had
been foreshadowed in my dreams, whose smile and whose eyes,
whose sens of humour and whose taste in books, whose
anxieties and whose intelligence perfectly matched those of
my ideal.
! 9. It was perhaps because we came to feel we were so
right for one another [she did not just finish my sentences,
she completed my life] that I was unable to contemplate the
idea that meeting Chloe had been simply a coincidence. I lost
the ability to consider the question of predestination with
the ruthless skepticism some would say it demanded. Not
normally superstitious, Chloe and I seized upon a host of

details, however trivial, as confirmation of what intuitively
we already felt: _that we had been destined for one another_.
We learnt that both of us had been born around midnight [she
at 11.45 p.m., I at 1.15 a.m.] in the same month of an even-
numbered year. Both of us had played clarinet and had had
parts in school productions of _A Midsummer Night's Dream_
[she had played Helena, I had played an attendant to
Theseus]. Both of us had two large freckles on the toe of the
left foot, and a cavity in the same rear molar. Both of us
had a habit of sneezing in bright sunlight and of drawing
ketchup out of its bottle with a knife. We even had the same
copy of Anna Karenina on our shelves (the old Oxford edition)
small details, perhaps, but were these not grounds enough on
which believers could found a new religion?
! 10. We attributed to events a narrative logic they could
not inherently have possessed. We mythologized our aircraft
encounter into the goddess Aphrodite's design, Act One, Scene
One of that primordial narrative, the love story. From the
time of each of our births, it seemed as though the giant
mind in the sky had been subtly shifting our orbits so that
we would one day meet on the Paris-London shuttle. Because
love had come true for us, we could overlook the countless
stories that fail to occur, romances that never get written
because someone misses the plane or loses the phone number.
Like historians, we were unmistakably on the side of what had
actually happened.
! 11. We should, of course, have been more sensible.
Neither Chloe nor I flew regularly between the two capitals
nor had been planning our respective trips for any length of
time. Chloe had been sent to Paris at the last minute by her
magazine after the deputy editor had happened to fall sick,
and I had gone there only because an architectural conference
in Bordeaux had finished early enough for me to spend a few
days in the capital with a friend. The two national airlines
running services between Charles de Gaulle and Heathrow
offered us a choice of six flights between nine o'clock and
lunchtime on our intended day of return. Given that we both
wanted to be back in London by the early afternoon of
December 6th, but were unresolved until the very last minute
as to what flight we would end up taking, the mathematical
probability at dawn of us both being on the same flight
(though not necessarily in adjoining seats) had been a figure
of one in six.
! 12. Chloe later told me that she had intended to take the
ten thirty Air France flight, but a bottle of shampoo in her

bag had happened to leak as she was checking out of her room,
which had meant repacking the bag and wasting a valuable ten
minutes. By the time the hotel had produced her bill, cleared
her credit card and found her a taxi, it was already nine
fifteen, and the chances that she would make the ten thirty
Air France flight had receded. When she reached the airport
after heavy traffic near the Porte de la Villette, the flight
had finished boarding and, because she didn't feel like
waiting for the next Air France, she went over to the British
Airways terminal, where she booked herself on the ten forty-
five plane to London, on which (for my own set of reasons) I
happened also to have a seat.
! 13. Thereafter, the computer so juggled things that it
placed Chloe over the wing of the aircraft in seat 15A and I
next to her in seat 15B. What we had ignored when we began
speaking over the safety-instruction card was the minuscule
probability that our discussion had been reliant upon. As
neither of us were likely to fly Club Class, and as there
were a hundred and ninety-one economy class seats, and Chloe
had been assigned seat 15A, and I, quite by chance, had been
assigned seat 15B, the theoretical probability that Chloe and
I would be seated next to one another (though the chances of
our actually talking to one another could not be calculated)
worked itself out as 220 in 36,290, a figure reducible to a
probability of one in 164.955.
British Airways Boeing 767
14. But this was of course only the probability that we would
be seated together if there had been just one flight between
Paris and London, but as there were six, and as both of us
had hesitated between these six, and yet had chosen this one,
the probability had to be further multiplied by the original
one chance in six, giving a final probability that Chloe and
I would meet one December morning over the English Channel in
a British Airways Boeing, as one chance in 989.727.
! 15. And yet it had happened. The calculation, far from
convincing us of rational arguments, only backed up the
mystical interpretation of our fall into love. If the chances
behind an event are enormously remote, yet it occurs
nevertheless, may one not be forgiven for invoking a
fatalistic explanation? Flicking a coin, a probability of one
in two prevents me from turning to God to account for the

result. But when it is a question of a probability of one in
989.727, it seemed impossible, from within love at least,
that this could have been anything but fate. It would have
taken a steady mind to contemplate without superstition the
enormous improbability of a meeting that had turned out to
alter our lives. Someone (at 30,000 feet) must have been
pulling strings in the sky.
! 16. From within love, we conceal the chance nature of our
lives behind a purposive veil. We insist that the meeting
with our redeemer, objectively haphazard and hence unlikely,
has been prewritten in a scroll slowly unwinding in the sky.
We invent a destiny to spare ourselves the anxiety that would
arise from acknowledging that the little sense there is in
our lives is merely created by ourselves, that there is no
scroll (and hence no preordained fate awaiting) and that who
we may or may not be meeting on aeroplanes has no sense
beyond that we choose to attribute to it--in short, the
anxiety that no one has written our story or assured our
loves.
! 17. Romantic fatalism protected Chloe and me from the
idea that we might equally well have begun loving someone
else had events turned out differently, shocking given how
closely love is bound up with a feeling of the necessity and
uniqueness of the beloved. How could I have imagined that the
role Chloe came to play in my life could equally well have
been filled by someone else, when it was with her eyes that I
had fallen in love, and her way of draining pasta, combing
her hair, and ending a phone conversation?
! 18. My mistake was to confuse a destiny to love with a
destiny to love a given person. It was the error of thinking
that Chloe, rather than love, was inevitable. But my
fatalistic interpretation of the start of our story was at
least proof of one thing: that I was in love with Chloe. The
moment when I would feel that our meeting or not meeting was
in the end only an accident, only a probability of one in
989.727, would also be the moment when I would have ceased to
feel the absolute necessity of a life with her - and thereby
have ceased to love her.
2

Idealization
1. 'Seeing through people is so easy, and it gets you
nowhere,' remarked Elias Canetti, suggesting how effortlessly
and yet how uselessly we can find fault with others. Do we
not fall in love partly out of a momentary will to suspend
seeing through people, even at the cost of blinding ourselves
a little in the process? If cynicism and love lie at opposite
ends of a spectrum, do we not sometimes fall in love in order
to escape the debilitating cynicism to which we are prone? Is
there not in every _coup de foudre_ a certain wilful
exaggeration of the qualities of the beloved, an exaggeration
which distracts us from our habitual pessimism and focuses
our energies on someone in whom we can believe in a way we
have never believed in ourselves?
! 2. I lost Chloe amidst the throng at passport control,
but found her again in the luggage-reclaim area. She was
struggling to push a trolley cursed with an inclination to
steer to the right, though the Paris carousel was to the far
left of the hall. Because my trolley had no mind of its own,
I walked over to offer it to her, but she refused, saying one
should remain loyal to trolleys, however stubborn, and that
strenuous physical exercise was no bad thing after a flight.
Indirectly (via the Karachi arrival), we made it to the Paris
carousel, already crowded with faces grown involuntarily
familiar since boarding at Charles de Gaulle. The first
pieces of luggage had begun to tumble down onto the jointed
rubber matting, and faces peered anxiously at the moving
display to locate their possessions.
! 3.! 'Have you ever been arrested at customs?' asked
Chloe.
! 'Not yet. Have you?'
! 'Not really, I once made a confession. This Nazi asked me
if I had anything to declare, and I said yes, even though I
wasn't carrying anything illegal.'
! 'So why did you say you were?'
! 'I don't know, I felt guilty: I have this tendency to
confess to things I haven't done. It somehow makes me feel
better.'
! 4.! 'By the way, don't judge me on my luggage,' said
Chloe as we continued to watch and wait while others got

lucky, 'I bought it at the last minute in this discount shop
on the Rue de Rennes. It's a bit of a freak.'
! 'Wait till you see mine. Except that I don't even have an
excuse. I've been carrying mine around for over five years.'
! 'Can I ask you a favour? Could you look after my trolley
while I look for the loo? I'll just be a minute. Oh, and if
you see a pink carrier bag with a luminous green handle,
that'll be mine.'
! 5. A little later, I watched Chloe walk back towards me
across the hall, wearing what I later learnt was her usual
pained and slightly anxious expression. She had a face that
looked permanently near tears, her eyes carried the fear of a
person about to be told a piece of very bad news. Something
about her made one want to comfort her, offer her reassurance
or a hand to hold.
!
! 6. Love was something I sensed very suddenly, shortly
after she had embarked on what promised to be a very long and
very boring story (indirectly sparked by the arrival of the
Athens flight in the carousel next to us) about a holiday she
had taken one summer with her brother in Rhodes. While Chloe
talked, I watched her hands fiddling with the belt of her
beige woollen coat (a pair of freckles were collected below
the index finger) and realized (as if this had been the most
self-evident of truths) that I loved her. However awkward it
was that she rarely finished her sentences, or was somewhat
anxious, and had not perhaps the best taste in earrings, she
was adorable. I fell prey to a moment of unrestrained
idealization, dependent as much on my emotional immaturity as
on the elegance of her coat, the after-effects of flying, and
the depressing interior of the Terminal Four baggage area,
against which her beauty showed up so starkly.
! 7. 'The island was packed with tourists, but we rented
motorcycles and...' Chloe's holiday story was dull, but its
dullness no longer counted against it. I had ceased to
consider it according to the secular logic of ordinary
conversations. I was no longer concerned to locate within it
either insight or humour, what mattered was not so much what
she was saying, as the fact that she was saying it - and that
I had decided to find perfection in everything she could
utter. I felt ready to follow her into every anecdote (there
was this shop that served fresh olives...), I was ready to
love every one of her jokes that had missed its punchline,
every reflection that had lost its thread. I felt ready to
abandon self-absorption for the sake of consummate empathy,

to catalogue every one of Chloe's memories, to become a
historian of her childhood, to learn all of her loves and
fears. Everything that could possibly have played itself out
within her mind and body had promptly grown fascinating.
! 8. Then the luggage arrived, hers only a few cases behind
mine; we loaded it onto the trolleys and walked out through
the green channel.
! 9. What is so frightening is the extent to which we may
idealize others when we have such trouble tolerating
ourselves because we have such trouble... I must have
realized that Chloe was only human, with all the implications
carried by the word, but could I not be forgiven for my
desire to suspend such a thought? Every fall into love
involves the triumph of hope over self-knowledge. We fall in
love hoping we won't find in another what we know is in
ourselves, all the cowardice, weakness, laziness, dishonesty,
compromise, and stupidity. We throw a cordon of love around
the chosen one and decide that everything within it will
somehow be free of our faults. We locate inside another a
perfection that eludes us within ourselves, and through our
union with the beloved, hope to maintain (against the
evidence of all self-knowledge) a precarious faith in our
species.
! 10. Why did this awareness not prevent my fall into love?
Because the illogicality and childishness of my desire did
not outweigh my need to believe. I knew the void that
romantic intoxication could fill, I knew the exhilaration
that comes from identifying someone, anyone, as admirable.
Long before I had even laid eyes on Chloe, I must have needed
to find in the face of another an integrity I had never
caught sight of within myself.
! 11. 'May I check your bags sir?' asked the customs man.
'Do you have anything to declare, any alcohol, cigarettes,
firearms...?'
! Like Oscar Wilde with his genius, I wanted to say, 'Only
my love,' but my love was not a crime, not yet at least.
! 'Shall I wait with you?' asked Chloe.
! 'Are you together with madam?' enquired the customs
officer.
! Afraid of presumption, I answered no, but asked Chloe if
she'd wait for me on the other side of the border.
! 12.! Love reinvents our needs with unique speed. My
impatience with the customs ritual indicated that Chloe, who
I had not known existed a few hours ago, had already acquired
the status of a craving. I felt I would die if I missed her

outside die for the sake of someone who had only entered my
life at eleven thirty that morning.
! 13. Chloe had waited, but we could spend only a moment
together. She had parked her car nearby. I had to take a taxi
to my office. Both parties hesitated whether or not to
continue with the story.
! 'I'll give you a call some time,' I said casually, 'we
could go and buy some luggage together.'
! 'That's a good idea,' said Chloe, 'have you got my
number?'
! 'I'm afraid I already memorized it, it was written on
your baggage tag.'
! 'You'd make a good detective, I hope your memory is up to
it. Well, it was nice meeting you,' said Chloe extending a
hand.
! 'Good luck with the cacti,' I called after her as I
watched her head for the lifts, her trolley still veering
insanely to the right.
! 14.! In the taxi on the way into town, I felt a curious
sense of loss. Could this really be love? To speak of love
after we had barely spent a morning together was to encounter
charges of romantic delusion and semantic folly. Yet we can
perhaps only ever fall in love without knowing quite who we
have fallen in love with. The initial convulsion is
necessarily founded on ignorance. Love or simple obsession?
Who, if not time (which lies in its own way), could possibly
begin to tell?
3
The Subtext of Seduction
1. For those in love with certainty, seduction is no
territory in which to stray. Every smile and word lead to a
dozen if not twelve thousand possibilities. Remarks that in
normal life (that is, life without love) can be taken at face
value now exhaust dictionaries with their possible meanings.

And for the seducer, the doubts reduce themselves to a
central question, faced with the trepidation of a criminal
awaiting sentence: Does s/he, or does s/he not, desire me?
! 2. The thought of Chloe did not stop haunting me in the
days that followed our encounter. Though under pressure to
complete plans for an office building near King's Cross, my
mind drifted irresponsibly but irresistibly back to her. I
felt the need to circle around the object of my adoration,
she kept breaking into consciousness with the urgency of a
matter that had to be addressed, though my thoughts had no
point to them, they were (objectively speaking) utterly
devoid of interest. Some of these Chloe-dreams ran like this,
'Oh, how sweet she is, how nice it would be to...'
! Others were more visual:
!
! (i)! Chloe framed by the aircraft window
! (ii)!
Her watery green eyes
! (iii)! Her teeth biting briefly into her lower lip
! (iv)!
The tilt of her neck when yawning
! (v)! The gap between her two front teeth
!
! 3. If only I had summoned such diligence for her phone
number, for the digits had altogether evaporated from my
memory (a memory that felt its time better spent replaying
images of Chloe's lower lip). Was it (071)
607 9187
609 7187
601 7987
690 7187
610 7987
670 9817
687 7187 ?
!
! 4. The search began badly 607 9187 was not the beloved's
abode but a funeral parlour off Upper Street, though the
establishment didn't reveal itself to be one until the end of
a trying conversation, in the course of which I learnt that
After Life also had an employee called Chloe, who was
summoned to the phone and spent agonizing minutes trying to
place my name (eventually identifying me as a customer who
had made inquiries into urns) before the confusion of names
was cleared up and I hung up, red-faced, drenched with sweat,
nearer death than life.

! 5.! When I finally reached my Chloe at work the
following day, she too seemed to have relegated me to the
next world. 'Things are crazy around here now. Can you hold
for a minute?' she asked secretarially.
! I held, offended. Whatever intimacy I had imagined, back
in office space, we were strangers.
! 'Listen, I'm sorry,' she said, coming back on the line,
'I can't talk now, we're rushing to get a supplement off to
press tomorrow. Can I call you back? I'll try to reach you
either at home or in the office when things calm down.'
! 6.! The telephone becomes an instrument of torture in
the demonic hands of a beloved who doesn't ring. When Chloe
called a few days later, I had rehearsed my speech too often
to deliver it correctly. I was caught unprepared, hanging
socks on a rail. I ran to the bedroom to pick up. My voice
carried with it a tension and an anger that I might more
skilfully have erased from a page. Authorship becomes
tempting to those who can't speak.
! 'What a surprise to hear from you,' I said
unconvincingly. 'We must have lunch some time.'
! 'Lunch. Goodness. I really can't this week.'
! 'Well, how about dinner?'
! 'I'm just looking at my diary, and you're not going to
believe this, but that's looking difficult too.'
! 'No problem,' I said, in a tone that strongly implied its
opposite.
! 'I tell you what, though, can you take this afternoon off
by any chance? We could meet at my office and go to the
National Gallery or something.'
!
! 7. The questions did not let up. What did Chloe think as
we made our way to Trafalgar Square from her office in
Bedford Street? On the one hand, she had been happy to take
the afternoon off to tour a museum with a man she'd only
briefly met on an aeroplane over a week before. But on the
other hand, there was nothing in her behaviour to suggest
that this was anything but an opportunity for a friendly
discussion. Suspended between innocence and collusion,
Chloe's every gesture became imbued with maddening
significance. Was I correct to detect traces of flirtation at
the ends of her sentences and the corners of her smiles, or
was this merely my own desire projected onto the face of
innocence?
! 8. We began our visit with the early Italians, though my
thoughts (I had lost all perspective, they had yet to find

theirs) were not with them. Before The Virgin and Child with
Saints, Chloe turned to remark that she had always had a
thing about Signorelli and, because it seemed appropriate, I
invented a passion for Antonello's Christ Crucified. She
looked thoughtful, immersed in the canvases, oblivious to the
noise and activity in the gallery. I followed a few paces
behind her, trying to focus on the paintings, but able only
to look at her looking.
! In the second and more crowded Italian room (1500-1600),
we stood so close together that my hand suddenly touched
hers. She didn't draw away and for a moment the feel of her
skin tingled through me. We faced a painting by Bronzino, An
Allegory of Venus and Cupid. Cupid kisses his mother Venus,
who surreptitiously removes one of his arrows: beauty
blinding love.
! 9.! Then, brusquely, as though an error had promptly
come to light, the hand moved away.
! 'I love those little figures in the background, the
little nymphs and angry gods and stuff,' said Chloe. 'Do you
understand all the symbolism?'
! 'Not really, besides it being Venus and Cupid.'
! 'I didn't even know that, so you're one up on me. I wish
I'd read more about ancient mythology,' she continued. 'But
actually, I like looking at things and not knowing quite what
they mean.'
! She turned to face the painting, her hand once more
brushing against mine.
! 10.! Was the hand a symbol (subtler than Bronzino's and
less well documented) of desire or the innocent, unconscious
spasm of a tired arm muscle? What was I to make of the way
Chloe straightened her skirt as we crossed into Early
Northern Painting or coughed by van Eyck's The Marriage of
Giovanni Arnolfini or handed me the catalogue in order to
rest her head on her hand?
! Desire had turned me into a relentless hunter for clues,
a romantic paranoiac, reading meaning into everything. But
whatever my impatience with the rituals of seduction, I was
aware that the enigma lent Chloe a distinctive appeal. The
most attractive are not those who allow us to kiss them at
once (we soon feel ungrateful) or those who never allow us to
kiss them (we soon forget them), but those who know how
carefully to administer varied doses of hope and despair.
! 11. Venus felt like a drink, so she and Cupid headed for
the lifts. In the cafeteria, Chloe took a tray and pushed it
down the steel runway.

! 'Do you want tea?' she asked.
! 'Yeah, but I'll get it.'
! 'Don't be silly, I'll get it.'
! 'Please let me do it.'
! 'No, no, I will.'
! The game continued for a few more rounds, its vigour
apparently accounted for by a mutual, irrational anxiety
about the commitment involved in letting someone else pay for
a drink. We sat at a table with a view of Trafalgar Square,
the lights of the Christmas tree lending an eerily festive
atmosphere to the urban scene. We began talking of art, then
moved on to artists, and from artists, we went to get a
second cup of tea (she won) and a cake (21), then we
digressed on to beauty, and from beauty we went to love.
! 'I don't understand,' said Chloe, 'you do or you don't
think that there's such a thing as true love?'
! 'I'm saying it's very subjective. You can't suppose that
there's one quality called "love", people mean such different
things by the word. It's tricky to distinguish between
passion and love, infatuation and love'
! 'Don't you find this cake disgusting?' interrupted
Chloe.! 'We should never have bought it. I mean, you
shouldn't have bought it for me. God, I'm so rude.'
! 'I'll be expecting a written apology.'
! 'But seriously, if you asked most people whether they
believed in love or not, they'd probably say they didn't. Yet
that's not necessarily what they truly think. It's just the
way they defend themselves against what they want. They
believe in it, but pretend they don't until they're allowed
to. Most people would throw away all their cynicism if they
could. The majority just never get the chance.'
! 12.! Who were these 'most people' she talked of? Was I
the man who would dispel her cynicism? We talked abstractly
of love, ignoring that lying on the table was not the nature
of love per se but the burning question of who we were and
would be to one another.
! Or was there in fact nothing on the table other than a
half-eaten carrot cake and two cups of tea? Was Chloe being
as abstract as she wished, meaning precisely what she said,
the diametrical opposite of the first rule of flirtation,
where what is said is never what is meant?
! 13.! Our hesitancy was a game, but a serious and useful
one, which minimized offending an unwilling partner and eased
a willing one more slowly into the prospect of mutual desire.
The threat of the great 'I like you' could be softened by

adding, 'but not so much that I will let you know it
directly..." Chloe and I were politely sparing each other the
need to pay the full price for a candid declaration of love.
! 14.! We helped to define what we wanted by reference to
others. Chloe had a friend at work who had a history of
relationships with unsuitable types. A courier was the
current blunderer.
! 'I mean, why does she hang out with a burly bloke in
leather trousers who smells of exhaust fumes and is using her
for sex? And that's fine if she wanted to use him for sex
too, but apparently he can't even sustain an erection for
that long.'
! 'How terrible,' I answered, worried by the possible
definition of the word 'long'.
! 'Or just sad. One has to go into relationships with equal
expectations, ready to give as much as the other - not with
one person wanting a fling and the other real love. I think
that's where all the agony comes from.'
! 15.! Because it was past six and her office was closing,
I asked Chloe whether she might not after all be free to have
dinner with me that night. She smiled at the suggestion,
stared briefly out of the window at a bus heading past St
Martin- in-the-Fields, looked back and said, 'No, thanks,
that would really be impossible.'
! Then, just as I was ready to despair, she blushed.
! 16.! Faced with ambiguous signals, what better
explanation than shyness: the beloved desires, but is too shy
to say so. The seducer who wishes to call his victim shy will
never be disappointed.
! 'My God, I've just forgotten something terrible,' said
Chloe, offering an alternative explanation for a red face, 'I
was supposed to call the printer this afternoon. I can't
believe I forgot to do that. I'm losing my head.'
! The lover offered sympathy.
! 'But look, about dinner, we'll have to do it another
time. I'd love that, I really would. It's just difficult at
the moment, but I'll give my diary another look and call you
tomorrow, I promise I will, and maybe we can fix something up
for before this weekend.'
4

Authenticity
1.! It is one of the ironies of love that it is easiest
confidently to seduce those to whom we are least attracted.
My feelings for Chloe meant I lost any belief in my own
worthiness. Who could I be next to her? Was it not the
greatest honour for her to have agreed to this dinner, to
have dressed so elegantly ('Is this all right?' she'd asked
in the car on the way to the restaurant, 'It had better be,
because I'm not changing a sixth time'), let alone that she
might be willing to respond kindly to some of the things that
might fall (if ever I recovered my tongue) from my unworthy
lips?
! 2.! It was Friday night and Chloe and I were seated at a
corner table of Les Liaisons Dangereuses, a French restaurant
that had recently opened at the end of the Fulham Road. There
could have been no more appropriate setting for Chloe's
beauty. The chandeliers threw soft shadows across her face,
the light green walls matched her light green eyes. And yet,
as though struck dumb by the angel that faced me across the
table, I lost all capacity either to think or speak and could
only silently draw invisible patterns on the starched white
tablecloth and take unnecessary sips of bubbled water from a
large glass goblet.
! 3.! My sense of inferiority bred a need to take on a
personality that was not my own, a seducing self that would
respond to every demand and suggestion made by my exalted
companion. Love forced me to look at myself as though through
Chloe's imagined eyes. 'Who could I become to please her?' I
wondered. I did not tell flagrant lies, I simply attempted to
anticipate everything I believed she might want to hear.
! 'Would you like some wine?' I asked her.
! 'I don't know, would you like wine?' she asked back.
! 'I really don't mind, if you feel like it,' I replied.
! 'It's as you please, whatever you want,' she continued.
! 'Either way is fine with me.'
! 'I agree.'
! 'So should we have it or not?'
! 'Well, I don't think I'll have any,' ventured Chloe.

! 'You're right, I don't feel like any either,' I
concurred.
! 'Let's not have wine, then,' she concluded.
! 'Great, so we'll just stick with the water.'
! 4.! The first course arrived, arranged on plates with
the symmetry of a formal French garden.
! 'It looks too beautiful to touch,' said Chloe (how I knew
the feeling), 'I've never eaten grilled scallops like this
before.' We began to eat. The only sound was that of cutlery
against china. There seemed to be nothing to say. Chloe had
been my only thought for too long, but the one thought that
at this moment I could not share with her.
! Silence was damning. A silence with an unattractive
person implies they are the boring one. A silence with an
attractive one immediately renders it certain you are the
tedious party.
! 5. Silence and clumsiness could of course be taken as
rather pitiful proof of desire. It being easy enough to
seduce someone towards whom one feels indifferent, the
clumsiest seducers could generously be deemed the most
genuine. Not to find the right words is paradoxically often
the best proof that the right words are meant. In that other
Liaisons Dangereuses, the Marquise de Merteuil faults the
Vicomte de Valmont for writing love letters that are too
perfect, too logical to be the words of a true lover, whose
thoughts will be disjointed and for whom the fine phrase will
always elude. Real desire lacks articulacy but how willingly
I would at that moment have swapped my constipation for the
Vicomte's loquacity.
! 6. I had to find out more about Chloe, for how could I
abandon my true self unless I knew what false self to adopt?
But the patience and intelligence required to fathom someone
else went far beyond the capacities of my anxious, infatuated
mind. I behaved like a reductive social psychologist, eager
to press my companion into simple categories, unwilling to
apply the care of a novelist to capturing the subtleties of
human nature. Over the first course, I blundered with heavy-
handed, interview-like questions: What do you like to read?
('Joyce, Henry James, Cosmo if there's time'), Do you like
your job? ('All jobs are pretty crap, don't you think?'),
What country would you live in if you could live anywhere?
('I'm fine here, anywhere where I don't have to change the
plug for my hairdryer'), What do you like to do on weekends?
('Go to the movies on Saturday, on Sunday, stock up on
chocolate for getting depressed with in the evening').

! 7. Behind such clumsy questions (with every one I asked,
I seemed to get further from knowing her) rested an impatient
attempt to get to the most direct question of all, 'Who are
you?' and hence 'Who should I be?' But my directness was
doomed, and the more I practised it, the more my subject
escaped through the net, letting me know what newspaper she
read and music she liked, but not thereby enlightening me as
to who she might really be.
! 8. Chloe hated talking about herself. Perhaps her most
obvious feature was a certain modesty and self-deprecation.
When the conversation led her to refer to herself, it would
not simply be 'I' or 'Chloe', but 'a basket-case like me'.
Her self-deprecation was all the more attractive for it
seemed to be free of the veiled appeals of self-pitying
people, the false self-deprecation of the _I'm so stupid/No,
you're not_ school.
! Her childhood had been awkward, but she was stoic about
the matter ('I hate childhood dramatizations that make Job
look like he got off lightly'). She had grown up in a
financially comfortable home. Her father ('All his problems
started when his parents called him Barry') had been an
academic, a law professor, her mother, Claire, had for a time
run a flower shop. Chloe was the middle child, a girl
sandwiched between two favoured and faultless boys. When her
older brother died of leukaemia shortly after her eighth
birthday, her parents' grief expressed itself as anger at
their daughter who, slow at school and sulky around the
house, had obstinately clung to life instead of their son.
She grew up guilty, filled with a sense of blame for what had
happened, feelings that her mother did little to alleviate.
The mother liked to pick on a person's weakest
characteristics and not let go. Chloe was forever reminded of
how badly she performed at school compared to her dead
brother, of how gauche she was, and of how disreputable her
friends were (criticisms that were not particularly true, but
that grew more so with every mention). Chloe had turned to
her father for affection, but the man was as closed with his
emotions as he was open with his legal knowledge, which he
would pedantically share with her as a substitute for warmth,
until her adolescence when Chloe's frustration with him
turned to anger and she openly defied him and everything he
stood for (it was fortunate that I had not chosen the legal
profession).
! 9. Of past boyfriends, only hints emerged over the meal:
one had worked as a motorcycle mechanic in Italy and had

treated her badly, another, who she had mothered, had ended
up in jail for possession of drugs. A third had been an
analytical philosopher at London University ('You don't have
to be Freud to see he was the daddy I never went to bed
with'), a fourth a test-car driver for Rover ('To this day I
can't explain that one. I think I liked his Birmingham
accent'). But no clear picture was emerging, and therefore
the shape of her ideal man forming in my head needed constant
readjustment. There were things she praised and condemned
within sentences, forcing me into frantic rewriting. At one
moment she seemed to be praising emotional vulnerability, and
at the next, damning it in favour of independence. Whereas
honesty was at one point extolled as the supreme value,
adultery was at another justified on account of the greater
hypocrisy of marriage.
! 10. The complexity of her views led to a schizophrenia in
mine. The main course (duck for me, salmon for her) was a
marshland sowed with mines. Did I think two people should
live solely for one another? Had my childhood been difficult?
Had I ever been truly in love? Was I an emotional or a
cerebral person? Who had I voted for in the last election?
What was my favourite colour? Did I think women were more
unstable than men? Because it involves the risk of alienating
those who don't agree with what one is saying, originality
proved wholly beyond me.
! 11. Chloe was facing a different dilemma, for it was time
for dessert, and though she had only one choice, she had more
than one desire.
! 'What do you think, the chocolate or the caramel?' she
asked, traces of guilt appearing on her forehead. 'Maybe you
can get one and I'll get the other and then we can share.'
! I felt like neither, I was not digesting properly, but
that wasn't the point.
! 'I just love chocolate, don't you?' asked Chloe. 'I can't
understand people who don't like chocolate. I was once going
out with a guy, this guy Robert I was telling you about, and
I was never really comfortable with him, but I couldn't work
out why. Then one day it all became clear: he didn't like
chocolate. I mean he didn't just not love it, this guy
actually hated it. You could have put a bar in front of him
and he wouldn't have touched it. That kind of thinking is so
far removed from anything I can relate to, you know. Well,
after that, you can imagine, it was clear we had to break
up.'

! 'In that case we should get both desserts and taste each
other's. But which one do you prefer?'
! 'I don't mind,' lied Chloe.
! 'Really? Well if you don't mind, then I'll take the
chocolate, I just can't resist it. In fact, you see the
double chocolate cake at the bottom there? I think I'll order
that. It looks far more chocolaty.'
! 'You're being seriously sinful,' said Chloe, biting her
lower lip in a mixture of anticipation and shame, 'but why
not? You're absolutely right. Life is short and all that.'
! 12. Yet again I had lied (I was beginning to hear the
sounds of cocks crowing in the kitchen). I had been more or
less allergic to chocolate all my life, but how could I have
been honest when the love of chocolate had been so
conclusively identified as a criterion of Chloe-
compatibility?
! I had decided that attraction was synonymous with the
removal of all personal characteristics, my true self being
necessarily in conflict with, and unworthy of the perfections
found in the beloved.
! 13. I had lied, but did Chloe like me any the more for
it? Curiously, she merely expressed a certain disappointment,
in view of the inferior taste of caramel, that I should have
insisted so strongly on taking the chocolate adding in an
off-hand way that a chocophile was in the end perhaps as much
of a problem as a chocophobe.
! 14. We charm by coincidence rather than design. What had
Chloe done to make me fall in love with her? My feelings had
as much to do with the adorable way she had asked the waiter
for extra butter as they had to do with her views on politics
or the dress she had carefully chosen.
! The steps I had on occasion seen women take to seduce me
were rarely the ones I had responded to. I was more likely to
be attracted by tangential details that the seducer had not
even been sufficiently aware of to push to the fore. I had
once taken to a woman who had a trace of down on her upper
lip. Normally squeamish about this, I had mysteriously been
charmed by it in her case, my desire stubbornly deciding to
collect there rather than around her warm smile or
intelligent conversation. When I discussed my attraction with
friends, I struggled to suggest that it had to do with an
indefinable 'aura' - but I could not disguise to myself that
I had fallen in love with a hairy upper lip. When I saw the
woman again, someone must have suggested electrolysis, for

the down was gone, and (despite her many qualities) my desire
soon followed suit.
! 15.! The Euston Road was still blocked with traffic when
we made our way back towards Islington. Long before such
issues could have become meaningful, we'd arranged that I
would drop Chloe home, but nevertheless the dilemmas of
seduction remained a weighty presence in the car. At some
point in the game, the actor must risk losing his audience.
However, reaching the door of 23a Liverpool Road, awed by the
dangers of misreading the signs, I concluded that the moment
to propose metaphorical coffee had not yet arisen.
! But after such a tense and chocolate-rich meal, my
stomach suddenly developed different priorities, and I was
forced to ask to be allowed up to the flat. I followed Chloe
up the stairs, into the living room and was directed to the
bathroom. Emerging a few minutes later with my intentions
unaltered, I reached for my coat and announced, with all the
thoughtful authority of a man who has decided restraint would
be best and fantasies entertained in weeks previous should
remain just that, that I had spent a lovely evening, hoped to
see her again soon and would call her after the Christmas
holidays. Pleased with such maturity, I kissed her on both
cheeks, wished her goodnight and turned to leave the flat.
! 16.! It was therefore fortunate that Chloe was not so
easily persuaded, arresting my flight by the ends of my
scarf. She drew me back into the apartment, placed both arms
around me and, looking me firmly in the eye with a grin she
had previously reserved for the idea of chocolate, whispered,
'We're not children, you know.' And with these words, she
placed her lips on mine and we embarked on one of the longer
and more beautiful kisses mankind has ever known.
5
Mind and Body

1. Few things are as antithetical to sex as thought. Sex is
instinctive, unreflexive and spontaneous, while thought is
careful, uninvolved, and judgemental. To think during sex is
to violate a fundamental law of intercourse. But did I have a
choice?
! 2. It was the sweetest kiss, everything one dreams a kiss
might be. It began with a light grazing and tender tentative
forays that secreted the unique flavour of our skins. Then
the pressure increased, our lips rejoined and parted, mine
leaving Chloe's for a moment in order to run along her
cheeks, her temples, her ears. She pressed her body closer
and our legs intertwined. Dizzy, we collapsed onto the sofa,
clutching at one another.
! 3. Yet if there was something interrupting this Eden, it
was the awareness of how strange it was for me to be lying in
Chloe's living room, my lips on hers, feeling her heat beside
me. After all the ambiguity, the kiss had come so suddenly
that my mind now refused to cede control of events to the
body. It was the thought of the kiss, rather than the kiss
itself, that was holding my attention.
! 4. I couldn't help but think that a woman whose body had
but a few hours ago been an area of complete privacy (only
suggested by the outlines of her blouse and the contours of
her skirt) was now preparing to undress before me. Though we
had talked at length, I felt a disproportion between my day-
time and night-time knowledge of Chloe, between the intimacy
that contact with her body implied and the largely unknown
realms of the rest of her life. But the presence of such
thoughts, flowing in conjunction with our physical
breathlessness, seemed to run rudely counter to the laws of
desire. They seemed to be ushering in an unpleasant degree of
objectivity, like a third person who would watch, observe,
and perhaps even judge.
! 5. 'Wait,' said Chloe as I unbuttoned her blouse, 'I'm
going to draw the curtains, I don't want the whole street to
see. Or why don't we move into the bedroom? We'll have more
space.'
! We picked ourselves up from the cramped sofa and walked
down a book-lined corridor into Chloe's bedroom. A large
white bed stood in the centre, piled high with cushions and
papers, clothes, and a telephone.
! 'Excuse the mess,' said Chloe, 'the rest of the place is
just for show, this is where I really live.'
! There was an animal on top of the mess.

! 'Meet Guppy my first love,' said Chloe, handing me a
furry grey elephant whose face bore no signs of jealousy.
! 6. There was an awkwardness while Chloe cleared the
surface of the bed, the eagerness of our bodies only a minute
before had given way to a heavy silence that indicated how
uncomfortably close we were to our own nakedness.
! 7. When Chloe and I undressed one another on top of the
large white bed and, by the light of a small bedside lamp,
saw each other naked for the first time, we attempted to be
as unselfconscious as Adam and Eve before the Fall. I slipped
my hands under Chloe's skirt and she unbuttoned my trousers
with an air of indifferent normality, like someone opening
the post or changing a duvet.
! 8. But if there was one thing likely to check our
passion, it was clumsiness. It was clumsiness that reminded
Chloe and me of the humour and bizarreness of having ended up
in bed together, I struggling to peel off her underwear (some
of it had become caught around her knees), she having trouble
with the buttons of my shirt yet each of us trying not to
comment, not to smile even, looking at one another with an
earnest air of desire, as though oblivious to the potentially
comic side of what was going on, sitting semi-naked on the
edge of the bed, our faces flushed like those of guilty
schoolchildren.
! 9. The philosopher in the bedroom is as ludicrous a
figure as the philosopher in the nightclub. In both arenas,
because the body is predominant and vulnerable, the mind
becomes an instrument of silent, uninvolved assessment.
Thought's infidelity lies in its privacy. 'If there is
something that you cannot say to me,' asks the lover, 'things
that you must think alone, then can you really be trusted?'
! I wasn't thinking anything cruel while I ran my hands and
lips across Chloe's body, it was simply that Chloe would
probably have been disturbed by news that I was thinking at
all. Because thought implies judgement, and because we are
all paranoid enough to take judgement to be negative, it is
constitutionally suspect in the bedroom. Hence the sighing
that drowns the sounds of lovers' thoughts, sighing that
confirms: I am too passionate to be thinking. I kiss, and
therefore I do not think such is the official myth under
which lovemaking takes place, the bedroom a unique space in
which partners tacitly agree not to remind one another of the
awe-inspiring wonder of their nudity.
! 10. There is the story of a nineteenth-century pious
young virgin who, on the day of her wedding, was warned by

her mother, 'Tonight, it will seem your husband has gone mad,
but you will find he has recovered by morning.' Is the mind
not offensive precisely because it symbolizes a refusal of
this insanity, seeming like an unfair way of keeping one's
head while others are losing their breath?
! 11. In the course of what Masters and Johnson have called
a plateau period, Chloe looked up at me and asked, 'What are
you thinking about, Socrates?'
! 'Nothing,' I answered.
! 'Bullshit, I can see it in your eyes, what are you
smiling about?'
! 'Nothing, I tell you, or else everything, a thousand
things, you, the evening, how we ended up here, how strange
and yet comfortable it feels.'
! 'Strange?'
! 'I don't know, yes, strange, I suppose I'm being absurdly
self-conscious about things.'
! Chloe laughed.
! 'What's so funny?'
! 'Turn round for a second.'
! 'Why?'
! 'Just turn over.'
! On one side of the room, positioned over a chest of
drawers and angled so it had been in Chloe's field of vision,
was a large mirror that showed both of our bodies lying
together, entangled in the bed linen.
! Had Chloe been watching us all the while?
! 'I'm sorry, I should have told you,' she smiled, 'it's
just I didn't want to ask not on the first night. It might
have made you self-conscious.'
6
Marxism
1. When we look at someone (an angel) from a position of
unrequited love and imagine the pleasures that being in

heaven with them might bring us, we are prone to overlook a
significant danger: how soon their attractions might pale if
they began to love us back. We fall in love because we long
to escape from ourselves with someone as ideal as we are
corrupt. But what if such a being were one day to turn around
and love us back? We can only be shocked. How could they be
divine as we had hoped when they have the bad taste to
approve of someone like us? If in order to love, we must
believe that the beloved surpasses us in some way, does not a
cruel paradox emerge when we witness this love returned? 'If
s/he really is so wonderful, how could s/he could love
someone like me?'
! 2. There is no richer territory for students of romantic
psychology than the atmosphere of the morning after. But
Chloe had other priorities upon stumbling out of sleep. She
went to wash her hair in the bathroom next door and I awoke
to hear water crashing on tiles. I remained in bed, encasing
myself in the shape and smell of her body that lingered in
the sheets. It was Saturday morning, and the timid rays of a
December sun were filtering through the curtains. It was a
privilege to be curled up in Chloe's inner sanctum, looking
at the objects that made up her daily life, at the walls she
woke to every morning, at her alarm clock, a packet of
aspirins, her watch and her earrings on the bedside table. My
love manifested itself as a fascination for everything Chloe
owned, for the material signs of a life I had yet fully to
discover but that seemed infinitely rich, full of the wonder
the everyday takes on in the hands of an extraordinary being.
There was a bright yellow radio in one corner, a print by
Matisse was leaning against a chair, her clothes from the
night before were hanging in the wardrobe by the mirror. On
the chest of drawers there was a pile of paperbacks, next to
it, her handbag and keys, a bottle of mineral water, and
Guppy the elephant. By a form of transference, I fell in love
with everything she owned, it all seemed so intriguing,
tasteful, different from what one could ordinarily buy in the
shops.
! 3. 'Have you been trying on my underwear?' asked Chloe a
moment later, emerging from the bathroom wrapped in a fluffy
white robe and a towel around her head. 'What have you been
doing all this time? You have to get out of bed, we can't
waste our day.'
! I sighed playfully.

! 'I'm going to go and prepare us some breakfast, so why
don't you have a shower in the meantime. There's some clean
towels in the cupboard. And how about a kiss?'
! 4. The bathroom was another chamber of wonders, full of
jars, lotions, and perfumes: the shrine of her body, my visit
a watery pilgrimage. I washed my hair, sang like a hyena
beneath the cascade, dried myself, and made use of a new
toothbrush Chloe had given me. When I returned to the bedroom
some fifteen minutes later, she was gone, the bed was made,
the room tidied and the curtains opened.
! 5. Chloe had not just made toast, she'd prepared a feast.
There was a basket of croissants, orange juice, a pot of
fresh coffee, some eggs and toast, and a huge bowl of yellow
and red flowers in the centre of the table.
! 6. 'It's fantastic,' I said, 'you prepared all this in
the time it took me to have a shower and get dressed.'
! 'That's because I'm not lazy like you. Come on, let's eat
before everything gets cold.'
! 'You're so sweet to have done this.'
! 'Rubbish.'
! 'No seriously, you are. It's not every day I get
breakfast cooked for me,' I said, and put my arms around her
waist. She didn't turn to look at me, but took my hand in
hers and squeezed it for a moment.
! 'Don't flatter yourself, it's not for you I did this, I
eat like this every weekend.'
! Her lie was symptomatic of a certain pride she took in
mocking the romantic, in being unsentimental, matter of fact,
stoic, yet at heart, she was the opposite: idealistic,
dreamy, giving, and deeply attached to everything she liked
verbally to dismiss as mushy.
! 7. In the course of a supremely mushy breakfast, I
realized something that might perhaps have seemed obvious,
but that struck me as both unexpected and complicated: that
Chloe had begun to feel for me a little of what I had for
many weeks felt for her. Objectively, this was not an unusual
thought, but in falling in love with her, I had somehow
entirely overlooked the possibility of reciprocation. I had
counted more on loving than being loved. And if I had
concentrated largely on the former dynamic, it was perhaps
because being loved is always the more complicated of the two
emotions, Cupid's arrow easier to send than receive.
! 8. It was this difficulty of receiving that struck me
over breakfast, for though the croissants could not have been
more buttery and the coffee more aromatic, something about

the attention and affection they symbolized disturbed me.
Chloe had opened her body to me the night before, in the
morning she had opened her kitchen, but I could not now
prevent a sense of uneasiness, that bordered on irritation,
and amounted to the muffled thought: 'What have I done to
deserve this?'
! 9. If one is not wholly convinced of one's own
lovability, receiving affection can appear like being
bestowed an honour for a feat one feels no connection with.
Lovers unfortunate enough to prepare breakfast for such types
must brace themselves for the recriminations due to all false
flatterers.
! 10. What arguments are about is never as important as the
discomfort for which they are an excuse. Ours started over
strawberry jam.
! 'Do you have any strawberry jam?' I asked Chloe,
surveying the laden table.
! 'No, but there's raspberry here, do you mind?'
! 'Sort of, yes.'
! 'Well, there's blackberry as well.'
! 'I hate blackberry, do you like blackberry?'
! 'Yeah, why not?'
! 'It's horrible. So there's no decent jam?'
! 'I wouldn't put it quite like that. There's five pots of
jam on the table, there's just no strawberry'
! 'I see.'
! 'Why are you making such a big deal of it?'
! 'Because I hate having breakfast without decent jam.'
! 'But there is decent jam, just not the one you like.'
! 'Is the shop far?'
! 'Why?'
! 'I am going out to buy some.'
! 'For Christ's sake, we've just sat down, everything will
be cold if you go now.'
! 'I'll go.'
! 'Why, if everything's going to get cold?'
! 'Because I need jam, that's why.'
! 'What's up with you?'
! 'Nothing, why?'
! 'You're being ridiculous.'
! 'No, I'm not.'
! 'Yes you are.'
! 'I just need jam.'
! 'Why are you being so impossible? I've cooked you this
whole breakfast and all you can do is make a fuss about some

pot of jam. If you really want your jam, just get the hell
out of here and eat it in someone else's company.'
! 11. There was a silence, Chloe's eyes glazed, then
abruptly she stood up and walked into the bedroom, slamming
the door behind her. I remained at the table, listening to
what might have been crying, feeling like a fool for
upsetting the woman I claimed to love.
! 12. Unrequited love may be painful, but it is safely
painful, because it does not involve inflicting damage on
anyone but oneself, a private pain that is as bitter-sweet as
it is self-induced. But as soon as love is reciprocated, one
must be prepared to give up the passivity of simply being
hurt to take on the responsibility of perpetrating hurt
oneself.
! 13. The repugnance I felt towards myself for hurting
Chloe was momentarily turned against her. I hated her for all
the efforts she had made with me, for her weakness in
believing in me, for her bad taste in allowing me to upset
her. It suddenly seemed pitiable that she had given me her
toothbrush, prepared breakfast for me, and begun to cry in
the bedroom like a child. I gave way to an overwhelming urge
to punish her for her weakness.
! 14. What had turned me into such a monster? The fact that
I had always been something of a Marxist.
! 15. There is the old joke made by the Marx who laughed
about not deigning to belong to a club that would accept
someone like him as a member, a truth as appropriate in love
as it is in club membership. We laugh at the Marxist position
because of its absurd contradictions: How is it possible that
I should both wish to join a club, and yet lose that wish as
soon as it comes true? How was it that I might have wished
Chloe to love me, but have been irritated by her when she did
so?
! 16. Perhaps because the origins of a certain kind of love
lie in an impulse to escape ourselves and our weaknesses by
an alliance with the beautiful and noble. But if the loved
ones love us back, we are forced to return to ourselves, and
are hence reminded of the things that had driven us into love
in the first place. Perhaps it was not love we wanted after
all, perhaps it was simply someone in whom to believe, but
how can we continue to believe in the beloved now that they
believe in us?
! 17. I wondered how Chloe could be justified in even
thinking she could base her emotional life around a scoundrel

like me. If she appeared to be a little in love, was this not
simply because she had misunderstood me?
! 18. Though from a position of unrequited love they long
to see their love returned, Marxists unconsciously prefer
that their dreams remain in the realm of fantasy. Why should
others think any better of them than they of themselves? Only
so long as the loved one believes the Marxist to be more or
less nothing, can the Marxist continue to believe the loved
one to be more or less everything. If Chloe had been lowered
in my estimation because she had slept with me, it was
because she had in the process caught a bad case of I-
infection.
! 19. I had often seen Marxism at work in others. At the
age of sixteen, I was for a while in love with a fifteen-
year-old girl, who was both captain of her school volleyball
team, very beautiful, and a committed Marxist.
! 'If a man says he'll call me at nine,' she once told me
over a glass of orange squash that I bought for her at the
school cafeteria, 'and he does actually ring at nine, I'll
refuse to take the call. After all, what's he so desperate
for? The only guy I like is the one who'll keep me waiting,
by nine thirty I'll do anything for him.'
! I must at that age have had an intuitive understanding of
her Marxism, for I remember efforts to seem uninterested in
anything she said or did. My reward came with our first kiss
a few weeks later, but though she was unquestionably
beautiful (and as adept at the arts of love as she was at
volleyball), the relationship did not last. It was too tiring
to make a point of always calling late.
! 20.! A few years later, I was seeing another girl, who
(like a good Marxist) believed that men should in some way
defy her in order to earn her love. One morning, before going
out for a walk with her in the park, I had put on an old and
particularly off-putting electric-blue pullover.
! 'Well, one thing is for sure, I'm not going out with you
looking like that,' exclaimed Sophie when she saw me coming
down the stairs. 'You've got to be joking if you think I'll
be seen with someone with that kind of jumper on.'
! 'Sophie, what does it matter what I'm wearing? We're only
going for a walk in the park,' I replied, half-fearing she
was serious.
! 'I don't care where we're going, I tell you, I'm not
going to the park with you unless you change.'
! But pig-headedness descended on me and I refused to do as
Sophie wanted, arguing the case of the electric jumper with

such force that a while later we headed for the Royal
Hospital Gardens with the offending garment still in place.
When we reached the gates of the park, Sophie, who had till
then been in a mild sulk, suddenly broke the silence, took my
arm, gave me a kiss, and said in words that perhaps provide
us with an essence of Marxism, 'Don't worry, I'm not angry
with you, I'm glad you kept the old horror on, I would have
thought you were so weak if you'd done what I told you.'
! 21.! To be loved by someone is to realize how much they
share the same needs that lie at the heart of our own
attraction to them. Albert Camus suggested that we fall in
love with people because, from the outside, they look so
whole, physically whole and emotionally 'together' when
subjectively, we feel dispersed and confused. We would not
love if there were no lack within us, but we are offended by
the discovery of a similar lack in the other. Expecting to
find the answer, we find only the duplicate of our own
problem.
! 22. A long, gloomy tradition in Western thought argues
that love is in its essence an unreciprocated, Marxist
emotion and that desire can only thrive on the impossibility
of mutuality. According to this view, love is simply a
direction, not a place, and burns itself out with the
attainment of its goal, the possession (in bed or otherwise)
of the loved one. The whole of troubadour poetry of twelfth-
century Provence was based on coital delay, the poet
repeating his plaints to a woman who repeatedly declined a
desperate gentleman's offers. Centuries later, Montaigne
declared that, 'In love, there is nothing but a frantic
desire for what flees from us' an idea echoed by Anatole
France's maxim that, 'It is not customary to love what one
has.' Stendhal believed that love could be brought about only
on the basis of a fear of losing the loved one and Denis de
Rougemont confirmed, 'The most serious obstruction is the one
preferred above all. It is the one most suited to
intensifying passion.' To listen to this view, lovers cannot
do anything save oscillate between the twin poles of yearning
for someone and longing to be rid of them.
! 23. There was a danger that Chloe and I would trap
ourselves in just such a Marxist spiral. But a happier
resolution emerged. I returned home from the breakfast
guilty, shamefaced, apologetic, and ready to do anything to
win Chloe back. It wasn't easy. She hung up on me at first,
then asked me whether I made a point of behaving like a
'small-time suburban punk' with women I had slept with. But

after apologies, insults, laughter, and tears, Romeo and
Juliet were to be seen together later that afternoon, mushily
holding hands in the dark at a four-thirty screening of Love
and Death at the National Film Theatre. Happy endings for
now at least.
! 24. There is usually a Marxist moment in every
relationship, the moment when it becomes clear that love is
reciprocated. The way it is resolved depends on the balance
between self-love and self-hatred. If self-hatred gains the
upper hand, then the one who has received love will declare
that the beloved (on some excuse or other) is not good enough
for them (not good enough by virtue of associating with no-
goods). But if self-love gains the upper hand, both partners
may accept that seeing their love reciprocated is not proof
of how low the beloved is, but of how lovable they have
themselves turned out to be.
7
False Notes
1. Long before we've had a chance to become truly familiar
with our loved one, we may be filled with the curious sense
that we know them already. It can seem as though we've met
them somewhere before, in a previous life, perhaps, or in our
dreams. In Plato's Symposium, Aristophanes accounts for this
feeling of familiarity by claiming that the loved one was our
long-lost 'other half to whose body our own had originally
been joined. In the beginning, all human beings were
hermaphrodites with double backs and flanks, four hands and
four legs and two faces turned in opposite directions on the
same head. These hermaphrodites were so powerful and their
pride so overweening that Zeus was forced to cut them in two,
into a male and female half and from that day, every man and
woman has yearned nostalgically but confusedly to rejoin the
part from which he or she was severed.

! 2. Chloe and I spent Christmas apart, but when we
returned to London in the new year, we began spending all our
time in each other's company. We led the typical romance of
late-twentieth-century urban life, sandwiched between office
hours and animated by such minor external events as walks in
the park, strolls through bookshops, and meals in
restaurants. We found agreement on so many different issues,
we hated and loved so many of the same things, that, after
only a short time, it seemed churlish to deny that, despite
an absence of clear separation marks, we must once have been
two parts of the same body.
! 3. It was congruence that made life with Chloe so
attractive. After unending irreconcilable differences in
matters of the heart, I had at last found someone whose jokes
I understood without the need of a dictionary, whose views
seemed miraculously close to mine, whose loves and hates kept
tandem with my own and with whom I repeatedly found myself
saying, 'It's amazing, I was about to say/think/do/express
the same thing...'
! 4. Theorists of love have tended to be rightly suspicious
of fusion, their scepticism stemming from the sense that it
is easier to impute similarity than investigate difference.
We base our fall into love upon insufficient material, and
supplement our ignorance with desire. But, these theorists
point out, time will show us that the skin separating our
bodies is not just a physical boundary, but is representative
of a deeper, psychological watershed we would be foolish to
try and cross.
! 5. Therefore, in the mature account of love, we should
never fall at first glance. We should reserve our leap until
we have completed a clear-eyed investigation of the depths
and nature of the waters. Only after we have undertaken a
thorough exchange of opinions on parenting, politics, art,
science, and appropriate snacks for the kitchen should two
people ever decide they are ready to love each other. In the
mature account of love, it is only when we truly know our
partners that love deserves the chance to grow. And yet in
the perverse reality of love (love that is born precisely
before we know) increased knowledge may be as much a hurdle
as an inducement for it may bring Utopia into dangerous
conflict with reality.
! 6. I date the realization that, whatever enticing
similarities we had identified between us, Chloe was perhaps
not the person from whom Zeus's cruel stroke had severed me,
to a moment somewhere in the middle of March when she

introduced me to a new pair of her shoes. It was perhaps a
pedantic matter over which to come to such a decision, but
shoes are supreme symbols of aesthetic, and hence by
extension psychological, compatibility. Certain areas and
coverings of the body say more about a person than others:
shoes suggest more than pullovers, thumbs more than elbows,
underwear more than overcoats, ankles more than shoulders.
! 7. What was wrong with Chloe's shoes? Objectively
speaking, nothing but when did one ever fall in love
objectively? She had bought them one Saturday morning in a
shop on the King's Road, ready for a party we had been
invited to that evening. I understood the blend of high- and
low-heeled shoe that the designer had tried to fuse, the
platformed sole rising sharply up to a heel with the breadth
of a flat shoe but the height of a stiletto. Then there was
the high, faintly rococo collar, decorated with a bow and
stars, and framed by a piece of chunky ribbon. The shoes were
the apogee of fashion, they were well made, they were
imaginative, and I detested them.
! 8.! 'I know you're going to love them,' said Chloe,
unfurling the purple tissue paper in which they had come,
'I'm going to wear them every day. Then again, they're so
amazing, maybe I should just wrap them back up, leave them in
their box, and never use them.'
! 'That's an interesting idea.'
! 'I could have bought the shop. They've got such great
things there. You should have seen the boots they had.'
! My mouth went dry. I felt a strange throbbing movement at
the back of my neck. I couldn't conceive how Chloe had lost
her heart to a deeply compromised piece of footwear. My idea
of who she was, my Aristophanic certainty of her identity,
had never included this sort of enthusiasm. Hurt and
disturbed by the unexpected turn in our relationship, I asked
myself, 'How could a woman who walks into my life (in
sensible flat black shoes favoured by schoolgirls and nuns)
and claims to love and understand me be drawn to such shoes?'
Yet outwardly, I simply enquired (in what I trusted to be a
remarkably innocent tone), 'Did you keep the receipt?'
! 9.! It promptly seemed easier to love Chloe without
knowing her. In one of his prose poems, Baudelaire describes
how a man spends a day walking around Paris with a woman he
feels ready to fall in love with. They agree on so many
things that by evening, he is convinced he has found a
companion with whose soul his own may unite. Thirsty, they go
to a glamorous new cafe on the corner of a boulevard, where

the man notices the arrival of an impoverished, working-class
family who have come to gaze through the plate-glass window
of the cafe at the elegant guests, dazzling white walls, and
gilded decor. The eyes of these poor on-lookers are full of
wonder at the display of wealth and beauty inside, and their
expression fills the narrator with pity and shame at his
privileged position. He turns to look at his loved one in the
hope of seeing his embarrassment and emotion reflected in her
eyes. But the woman with whose soul his own was prepared to
unite has a different agenda. She snaps that these wretches
with their wide, gaping eyes are unbearable to her, she
wonders what on earth they want and asks him to tell the
owner to have them moved on straightaway. Does not every love
story have these moments? A search for eyes that will reflect
one's thoughts and that ends up with a (tragicomic)
divergence - be it over the class struggle or a pair of
shoes.
! 10. Perhaps the easiest people to fall in love with are
those about whom we know nothing. Romances are never as pure
as those we imagine during long train journeys, as we
secretly contemplate a beautiful person who is gazing out of
the window a perfect love story interrupted only when the
beloved looks back into the carriage and starts up a dull
conversation about the excessive price of the on-board
sandwiches with a neighbour or blows her nose aggressively
into a handkerchief.
! 11. The dismay that greater acquaintance with the beloved
can bring is comparable to composing a symphony in one's head
and then hearing it played in a concert hall by a full
orchestra. Though we are impressed to find so many of our
ideas confirmed in performance, we cannot help but notice
details that are not quite as we had intended them to be. Is
one of the violinists not a little off key? Is the flute not
a little late coming in? Is the percussion not a little loud?
People we love at first sight are as free from conflicting
tastes in shoes or literature as the unrehearsed symphony is
free from off-key violins or late flutes. But as soon as the
fantasy is played out, the angelic beings who floated through
consciousness reveal themselves as material beings, laden
with their own mental and physical history.
! 12. Chloe's shoes were only one of a number of false
notes that came to light in the early period of the
relationship. Living day to day with her was like
acclimatizing myself to a foreign country, and therefore

feeling prey to occasional xenophobia at departures from my
own traditions and expectations.
! 13. Threatening differences did not collect at the major
points (nationality, gender, class, occupation), but rather
at small junctures of taste and opinion. Why did Chloe insist
on leaving the pasta to boil for a fatal extra few minutes?
! Why was I so attached to my current pair of glasses? Why
did she have to do her gym exercises in the bedroom every
morning? Why did I always need eight hours' sleep? Why did
she not have more time for opera? Why did I not have more
time for Joni Mitchell? Why did she hate seafood so much? How
could one explain my resistance to flowers and gardening? Or
hers to trips on water? How come she liked to keep her
options open about God ('at least till the first cancer') But
why was I so closed on the matter?
! 14. Anthropologists tell us that the group always comes
before the individual, that to understand the latter one must
pass through the former, be it nation, tribe, clan, or
family. Chloe had no great fondness for her family, but when
her parents invited us to spend Sunday with them at their
home near Marlborough, in a spirit of scientific enquiry I
urged her to take up the offer.
! 15. Everything about Gnarled Oak Cottage was a sign that
Chloe had been born in one world, one galaxy almost, and I
another. The living room was decorated in faux-Chippendale
furniture, the carpet was a stained reddish brown, dusty
bookcases with volumes of Trollope and Stubbsesque paintings
lined the walls, three salival dogs were running in and out
between the living room and the garden, and corpulent
cobwebbed plants sagged in every corner. Chloe's mother wore
a thick purple pullover with holes in it, a flowery baggy
skirt, and long grey hair scraped back without design. One
half expected to find bits of straw on her, an aura of rural
nonchalance reinforced by her repeated forgettings of my name
(and her creative approach to finding me another). I thought
of the difference between Chloe's mother and my own, the
contrasting introductions to the world that these two women
had performed. However much Chloe had run away from all of
this, to the big city, to her own values and friends, the
family still represented a genetic and historical tradition
to which she was indebted. I noticed a crossover between the
generations: the mother preparing potatoes in the same way as
Chloe, crushing a little garlic into the butter and grinding
sea salt over them, or sharing her daughter's enthusiasm for
painting, or taste in Sunday papers. The father was a keen

rambler, and Chloe loved walking too, often dragging me on
weekends for a brisk tour of Hampstead Heath, proclaiming the
benefits of fresh air in a way that her father had perhaps
once done.
! 16. It was all so strange and new. The house in which she
had grown up evoked a whole past on which I had missed out,
and which I would have to take on board in order to
understand her. The meal was largely spent on a question-
answer volley between Chloe and her parents on various
aspects of family folklore: Had the insurance paid for
Granny's hospital bills? Was the water tank mended? Had
Carolyn heard from the estate agency yet? Was it true Lucy
was going to study in the States? Had anyone read Aunt
Sarah's novel? Was Henry really going to marry Jemima? (All
these characters who had entered Chloe's life long before I
had - and might, with the tenacity of everything familial,
still be there when I was gone.)
! 17. It was intriguing to see how different the parents'
perception of Chloe could be from my own. Whereas I had known
her to be both accommodating and generous, at home she was
known to be bossy and demanding. As a child she had been
thought of as a miniature autocrat whom the parents had
nicknamed Miss Pompadosso after the heroine of a children's
book. Whereas I had known Chloe to be levelheaded about money
and her career, the father remarked that his daughter 'did
not understand the first thing about how things work in the
real world', while the mother joked about her 'bullying all
her boyfriends into submission'. I was forced to add to my
understanding of Chloe a whole section that had unfolded
prior to my arrival, my vision of her colliding with that
imposed by the initial family narrative.
! 18. In the afternoon, Chloe showed me around the house.
She took me into the room at the top of the stairs into which
she'd been afraid to go as a child, because her uncle had
once told her a ghost lived inside the piano. We looked into
her old bedroom that her mother now used as a studio, and she
pointed out a hatch that she had used to get into the attic
in order to escape with her elephant Guppy whenever she'd
been miserable. We took a walk in the garden, past a still-
bruised tree at the bottom of a slope into which the family
car had ploughed when she had once dared her brother to
release the handbrake. She showed me the neighbours' house,
whose blackberry bushes she had picked clean in the summers,
and whose former owner's son she had kissed on the way back

from school. He had since died, added Chloe with curious
indifference, 'in an incident with a corn-thresher'.
! 19.! Later in the afternoon, I took a walk in the garden
with her father, a donnish man to whom thirty years of
marriage had imparted some distinctive views on the subject.
! 'I know my daughter and you are fond of one another. I'm
no expert on love, but I'll tell you something. In the end,
I've found that it doesn't really matter who you marry. If
you like them at the beginning, you probably won't like them
at the end. And if you start off hating them, there's always
the chance you'll end up thinking they're all right.'
! 20.! On the train back to London that evening, I felt
exhausted, weary at all the differences between Chloe's early
world and mine. While the stories and settings of her past
had enchanted me, they had also proved terrifying and
bizarre, all these years and habits before I had known her,
but that were as much a part of who she was as the shape of
her nose or the colour of her eyes. I felt a primitive
nostalgia for familiar surroundings, recognizing the
disruption that every relationship entails a whole new
person to learn about, to suggest myself to, to acclimatize
myself to. It was perhaps a moment of fear at the thought of
all the differences I would find in Chloe, all the times she
would be one thing, and I another, when our world views would
be incapable of alignment. Staring out of the window at the
Wiltshire countryside, I had a lost child's longing for
someone I could already wholly understand, the eccentricities
of whose house, parents, and history I had already tamed.
8
Love or Liberalism
1. If I can return for a moment to Chloe's shoes, it might be
worth mentioning that their inauguration did not end with my
negative yet privately formulated analysis of their virtues.
I confess that it ended in the second greatest argument of

our relationship, in tears, insults, shouting, and the right
shoe crashing through a pane of glass onto the pavement of
Denbigh Street. The sheer melodramatic intensity of the event
aside, the matter sustains philosophical interest because it
symbolizes a choice as radical in the personal sphere as in
the political: a choice between love and liberalism.
! 2. The choice has often been missed in an optimistic
equation of the two terms, with the former considered a
handmaiden of the latter. But if the terms have been linked,
it is always in an implausible marriage, for it seems
impossible to talk of love and letting live, and if we are
left to live, we are not usually loved. We may well ask why
the viciousness witnessed between lovers would not be
tolerated anywhere outside conditions of open enmity. Then,
to build bridges between shoes and nations, we may ask why
countries that have no language of community or citizenship
usually leave their members isolated but unmolested and yet
why countries that talk most of love, kinship, and
brotherhood routinely end up slaughtering great swathes of
their populations.
! 3. 'How do you mean, did I keep the receipt?' shouted
Chloe.
! 'I just mean if things go wrong with them.'
! 'They're not televisions.'
! 'I don't know, the heel might get stuck between two
paving stones while you're stepping out of a gondola. Or you
might suddenly decide you hated them.'
! 'Why not just tell me you hate them?'
! 'I don't hate them. (Pause.) I do hate them.'
! 'You're just jealous.'
! 'I've always wanted to look like a pelican.'
! 'And a bastard.'
! 'I'm sorry, but I really don't think they're suitable for
the party tonight.'
! 'Why do you have to spoil everything?'
! 'Because I care for you. Someone has to let you know the
truth.'
! 'Gemma said she liked them. And Leslie would definitely
like them. And I can't imagine Abigail having a problem with
them either. So what's wrong with you?'
! 'Your girlfriends don't love you. Not in the proper way.
Not in the way that means you have to break bad news to
someone even if it pains you terribly.'
! 'You're not upset.'
! 'I am.'

! 'You deserve to be.'
! 4. The reader can be spared the full melodrama, it
suffices to say that moments later, the tempest that had been
brewing reached a climax, Chloe took off one of the offensive
shoes, supposedly so as to let me look at it, but more
realistically, to murder me with it, I chose to duck the
incoming projectile, it crashed through the window behind me
and fell down to the street, where it impaled itself in the
rubbish area in the remains of a neighbour's chicken madras.
! 5. Our argument was peppered with the paradoxes of love
and liberalism. What did it really matter what Chloe's shoes
were like? There were so many other wonderful sides to her,
was it not spoiling the game to arrest my gaze on this
detail? Why could I not have politely lied to her as I might
have done to a friend? My only excuse lay in the claim that I
loved her, that she was my ideal save for the shoes and
that I therefore had to point out this blemish, something I
would never have done with a friend whose departures from my
ideal would have been too numerous to begin with, a
friendship in which the concept of an ideal would never even
have entered into my thinking. Because I loved her, I told
her therein lay my sole defence.
! 6. In our more expansive moments, we imagine romantic
love to be akin to Christian love, an uncritical, expansive
emotion that declares I will love you for everything that you
are, a love that has no conditions, that draws no boundaries,
that adores every last shoe, that is the embodiment of
acceptance. But the arguments that hound lovers are a
reminder that Christian love is not prone to survive a move
into the bedroom. Its message seems more suited to the
universal than the particular, to the love of all men for all
women, to the love of two neighbours who will not hear each
other snoring.
! 7. Though it was not always a matter for glaziers,
illiberalism was never one sided. There were a thousand
things about me that drove Chloe to distraction: Why was I so
bored by the theatre? Why did I insist on wearing a coat that
looked a century old? Why did I always knock the duvet off
the bed in my sleep? Why did I think Saul Bellow was such a
great writer? Why had I not yet learnt how to park a car
without leaving most of the wheel on the pavement? Why did I
constantly put my feet on the pillows? These were the
ingredients of the domestic gulag, the daily attempts to tug
each other closer to our ideals.

! 8. And what excuse was there for this? Nothing but the
old line that parents and politicians will use before taking
out their scalpels: I care about you, therefore I will upset
you, I have honoured you with a vision of how you should be,
therefore I will hurt you.
! 9. Chloe and I would never have been as brutal to our
friends as we were to one another. But we equated intimacy
with a form of ownership and licence. We may have been kind,
yet we were no longer polite. When we started arguing one
night about the films of Eric Rohmer (she hated them, I loved
them), we forgot there was a chance Rohmer's films could be
both good and bad depending on who was watching them. She
degenerated into calling me 'a stuffy over-intellectual
turd', I reciprocated by judging her 'a degenerate product of
modern capitalism' (proving her accusation in the process).
! 10. Politics seems an incongruous field to link to love,
but can we not read, in the bloodstained histories of the
French, Fascist, or Communist revolutions, something of the
same coercive structure, the same impatience with diverging
views fuelled by passionate ideals? Amorous politics begins
its infamous history with the French Revolution, when it was
first proposed (with all the choice of a rape) that the state
would not just govern but also love its citizens, who would
respond likewise or face the guillotine. The beginning of
revolutions is psychologically strikingly akin to that of
certain relationships: the stress on unity, the sense of
omnipotence, the desire to eliminate secrets (with the fear
of the opposite soon leading to lover's paranoia and the
creation of a secret police).
! 11. But if the beginnings of love and amorous politics
are equally rosy, then the ends are often equally bloody.
We're familiar with political love that ends in tyranny,
where a ruler's firm conviction that he has the true
interests of his nation at heart ends up lending him the
confidence to murder without qualms (and 'for their own
good') all who disagree with him. Romantic lovers are
similarly inclined to vent their frustration on dissenters
and heretics.
! 12. A few days after the shoe incident, I went to the
newsagent to pick up a paper and a carton of milk. Mr Paul
told me he'd just run out of the semi-skimmed variety, but
that if I could wait a moment, he'd get another crate in from
the storeroom. Watching him walk out towards the back of the
shop, I noticed that Mr Paul was wearing a pair of thick grey
socks and brown leather sandals. They were awe-inspiringly

ugly, but curiously enough, wholly inoffensive. Why could I
not remain similarly composed in the face of Chloe's shoes?
Why could I not enjoy the same cordiality with the woman I
loved as with the newsagent who sold me my daily rations?
! 13. The wish to replace the butcher-butchered
relationship with a newsagent-customer one has long dominated
political thinking. Why could rulers not act politely towards
their citizens, tolerating sandals, dissent, and divergence?
The answer from liberal thinkers is that cordiality can arise
only once rulers give up talk of governing for the love of
their citizens, and concentrate instead on ensuring sensible,
minimal governance. Liberal politics finds its greatest
apologist in John Stuart Mill, who in 1859 published a
classic defence of loveless liberalism, On Liberty, a ringing
plea that citizens should be left alone by governments,
however well meaning they were, and not be told how to lead
their personal lives, what gods to worship or books to read.
Mill argued that though kingdoms and tyrannies felt
themselves entitled to hold 'a deep interest in the whole
bodily and mental discipline of every one of its citizens',
the modern state should as far as possible stand back and let
people govern themselves. Like a harassed partner in a
relationship who begs simply to be given space, Mill
ventured: The only freedom which deserves the name is that of
pursuing our own good, in our own way, so long as we do not
attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts
to obtain it... The only purpose for which power can be
rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized society
against his will is to prevent harm to others. His own good,
either physical or moral, is not sufficient warrant.*
! --On Liberty, John Stuart Mill (Cambridge University
Press, 1989).
! 14. The wisdom of Mill's thesis is such that one might
want to see it applied to relationships as much as to
governments. However, on reflection, applied to the former,
it seems to lose much of its appeal. It evokes certain
marriages, where love has evaporated long ago, where couples
sleep in separate bedrooms, exchanging the occasional word
when they meet in the kitchen before work, where both
partners have long ago given up hope of mutual understanding,
settling instead for a tepid friendship based on controlled
misunderstanding, politeness while they get through the
evening's shepherd's pie, 3 a.m. bitterness at the emotional
failure that surrounds them.

! 15. We seem to be thrown back on a choice between love
and liberalism. The sandals of the newsagent didn't annoy me
because I didn't care for him, I wished to get my paper and
milk and leave. I didn't wish to cry on his shoulder or bare
my soul, so his footwear remained unobtrusive. But had I
fallen in love with Mr Paul, could I really have continued to
face his sandals with equanimity, or would there not have
come a point when (out of love) I would have cleared my
throat and suggested an alternative?
! 16. If my relationship with Chloe never reached the
levels of the Terror, it was perhaps because she and I were
able to temper the choice between love and liberalism with an
ingredient that too few relationships and even fewer amorous
politicians (Lenin, Pol Pot, Robespierre) have ever
possessed, an ingredient that might just (were there enough
of it to go around) save both states and couples from
intolerance: a sense of humour.
! 17. It seems significant that revolutionaries share with
lovers a tendency towards terrifying earnestness. It is as
hard to imagine cracking a joke with Stalin as with Young
Werther. Both of them seem desperately, though differently,
intense. With the inability to laugh comes an inability to
acknowledge the contradictions inherent in every society and
relationship, the multiplicity and clash of desires, the need
to accept that one's partner will never learn how to park a
car, or wash out a bath or give up a taste for Joni Mitchell
- but that one cares for them rather a lot nevertheless.
! 18. If Chloe and I overcame certain of our differences,
it was because we had the will to make jokes of the impasses
we found in each other's characters. I could not stop hating
Chloe's shoes, she continued to like them (I was sent down to
pick the left one up and give it a clean), but we at least
found room to turn the incident into a joke. By threatening
to 'defenestrate' ourselves whenever arguments became heated,
we were always sure to draw a laugh and neutralize a
frustration. My driving techniques could not be improved, but
they earned me the name 'Alain Prost'; Chloe's attempts at
martyrdom I found wearing, but less so when I could respond
to them by calling her 'Joan of Arc'. Humour meant there was
no need for a direct confrontation; we could glide over an
irrirant, winking at it obliquely, making a criticism without
needing to spell it out.
! 19. It may be a sign that two people have stopped loving
one another (or at least stopped wishing to make the effort
that constitutes ninety per cent of love) when they are no

longer able to spin differences into jokes. Humour lined the
walls of irritation between our ideals and the reality:
behind every joke, there was a warning of difference, of
disappointment even, but it was a difference that had been
defused - and could therefore be passed over without the need
for a pogrom.
9
Beauty
1. Does beauty give birth to love or does love give birth to
beauty? Did I love Chloe because she was beautiful or was she
beautiful because I loved her? Surrounded by an infinite
number of people, we may ask (staring at our lover while they
talk on the phone or lie opposite us in the bath) why our
desire has chosen to settle on this particular face, this
particular mouth or nose or ear, why this curve of the neck
or dimple in the cheek has come to answer so precisely to our
criterion of perfection? Every one of our lovers offers
different solutions to the problem of beauty, and yet
succeeds in redefining our notions of attractiveness in a way
that is as original and as idiosyncratic as the landscape of
their face.
! 2. If Marsilio Ficino (143399) defined love as 'the
desire for beauty', in what ways did Chloe fulfil this
desire? To listen to Chloe, in no way whatever. No amount of
reassurance could persuade her that she was anything but
loathsome. She insisted on finding her nose too small, her
mouth too wide, her chin uninteresting, her ears too round,
her eyes not green enough, her hair not wavy enough, her
breasts too small, her feet too large, her hands too wide,
and her wrists too narrow. She would gaze longingly at the
faces in the pages of Elle and Vogue and declare that the
concept of a just God was in the light of her physical
appearance simply an incoherence.

! 3. Chloe believed that beauty could be measured according
to an objective standard, one she had simply failed to reach.
Without acknowledging it as such, she was resolutely attached
to a Platonic concept of beauty, an aesthetic she shared with
the world's fashion magazines and which fuelled a daily sense
of self-loathing in front of the mirror. According to Plato
and the editor of Vogue, there exists such a thing as an
ideal form of beauty, made up of a balanced relation between
parts, and which earthly bodies will approximate to a greater
or a lesser degree. There is a mathematical basis for beauty,
Plato suggested, so that the face on the front cover of a
magazine is necessarily rather than coincidentally pleasing.
! 4. Whatever mathematical errors there were in her face,
Chloe found the rest of her body even more unbalanced.
Whereas I loved to watch soapy water running over her stomach
and legs in the shower, whenever she looked at herself in the
mirror she would invariably declare that something was
'lopsided' though quite what I never discovered. Leon
Battista Alberti (1409-72) might have known better, for he
believed that any beautiful body had fixed proportions which
he spelt out mathematically after dividing the body of a
beautiful Italian girl into six hundred units, then working
out the distances from section to section. Summing up his
results in his book On Sculpture, Alberti defined beauty as
'a Harmony of all the Parts, in whatsoever Subject it
appears, fitted together with such proportion and connection,
that nothing could be added, diminished or altered, but for
the worse'. But according to Chloe, however, almost anything
about her body could have been added, diminished, or altered
without spoiling anything that nature had not already
devastated.
! 5. Clearly Plato and Leon Battista Alberti had neglected
something in their aesthetic theories, for I found Chloe
excessively beautiful. Did I like her green eyes, her dark
hair, her full mouth? I hesitate to try and pin down her
appeal. Discussions of physical beauty have some of the
futility of debates between art historians attempting to
justify the relative merits of different artists. A Van Gogh
or a Gauguin? One might try to redescribe the work in
language ('the lyrical intelligence of Gauguin's South Sea
skies...' next to 'the Wagnerian depth of Van Gogh's
blues...') or else to elucidate technique or materials ('the
Expressionist feel of Van Gogh's later years...', 'Gauguin's
Cezanne-like linearity...'). But what would all this do to
explain why one painting grips us by the collar and another

Alain De Botton Essays In Love

Alain De Botton Essays In Love

More Related Content

Alain De Botton Essays In Love