Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Aqueduct for Corporate Water Disclosure
May 8 2013, 11:00am - 12:00pm EST
Paul Reig, WRI Aqueduct
Cate Lamb, CDP Water
HOW TO SUBMIT QUESTIONS
If the viewing panel is minimized, press
the orange arrow to expand it
To submit a question,
write your question in this
box and press ‘send’
AGENDA
 The Aqueduct Project – Paul Reig
 Aqueduct for Corporate Water Management – Paul Reig
 Corporate Water Disclosure – Cate Lamb
 CDP Water 2013 Questionnaire – Cate Lamb & Paul Reig
 Q&A
AQUEDUCT PROJECT
CORPORATE WATER MANAGEMENT
Paul Reig, WRI Aqueduct
WATER SUPPLY
CRISES RISK TOPS
IMPACT AND
LIKELIHOOD
Photo: flickr/r~p~m
Source: National Geographic
Photo: flickr/zen
WATER RISKS TO:
GOVERNMENTS
COMPANIES
INVESTORS
DETAILED, COMPARABLE, GLOBAL
WATER RISK INFORMATION
Photo: NASA
MAPPING: GLOBAL WATER RISKS
UNDERSTANDING RISK: AQUEDUCT FRAMEWORK
 Baseline water stress
 Inter-annual variability
 Seasonal variability
 Flood occurrence
 Drought severity
 Upstream storage
 Groundwater stress
Physical Risk:
QUANTITY
Overall Water Risk
 Media coverage
 Access to water
 Threatened amphibians
Regulatory &
Reputational Risk
 Return flow ratio
 Upstream protected land
Physical Risk:
QUALITY
OPEN WEB PLATFORM
AQUEDUCT: MEASURING EXPOSURE TO WATER RISK
1
• Select Weights
2
• Import locations
3
• Export results
GO TO:
(1) SELECT WEIGHTS
(2) IMPORT LOCATIONS
(2) IMPORT LOCATIONS
(2) IMPORT LOCATIONS
(2) IMPORT LOCATIONS
(2) IMPORT LOCATIONS
(3) EXPORT RESULTS
(3) EXPORT RESULTS
AQUEDUCT: CORPORATE WATER MANAGEMENT
Sources: WBCSD (2012) Water For Business Version 3
CORPORATE WATER DISCLOSURE
Cate Lamb, CDP Water
Global water crises
23
{{
{{
To catalyse action on corporate
water stewardship to safeguard
precious water resources
Vision, CDP Water Program
Investor interest in water is rising
CDP’s Water Signatories CDP’s Water Signatories Assets
25
Water 2013
530investor signatories
US$57 trillion in assets
What do your investors and customers want to know?
{ Would interuption in the supply of good quality water
result in substantive interuption to your business?
{ Are any of your critical suppliers or business inputs
exposed to water risks?
{ How confident are you that you will have access to the
quantity and quality of water required to operate now and
in the future?
How resilient is your business in the face
of water challenges?
Questionnaire sent to 1,039 companies in 2013
Companies outside these sectors
and regions are welcome to
respond voluntarily; to register
email respond@cdproject.net
Targeted industry sectors
include:
• apparel
• chemicals
• food & beverage
• metals & mining
• oil & gas
• pharmaceuticals
• power generation
• semiconductors
Global 500
ASX 100
JSE 100
S&P 500
CDP WATER 2013 QUESTIONNAIRE
Cate Lamb, CDP Water
Paul Reig, WRI Aqueduct
2013 Water Questionnaire
Water
management
& governance
Risks &
opportunities
Water
accounting
2.1 Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions?
2.2 Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report which help you to identify which
of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk?
2.5 Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related
risk?
Our questionnaire: Risk indicators
30
Country or region
River basin
Risk Indicator
Proportion of
operations located in
this region (%)
Further comments
Country drop down list
Other: text box
River Basin drop down
list
Not known
Other: text box
Flooding
Poor water quality
Tightening of regulations
Poor enforcement of regulations
Inadequate water infrastructure
Inadequate access to water and
sanitation
Other: text box
0
1-10
11-20
21-30
31-40
41-50
51-60
61-70
71-80
81-90
91-100
[plain text entry: 2400 characters]
Add Row
QUESTION 2.1: WATER-STRESSED REGIONS
QUESTIONS (2.2) (2.5): WATER-RELATED RISK
Physical Risks – Quantity
Physical Risks – Quality
Regulatory & Reputational Risks
3.1 Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a
substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure?
Our questionnaire: Risk assessment
33
Substantive change
What constitutes a substantive change will vary between companies.
(a) the proportion of business units affected;
(b) the size of the impact on those business units, and
(c) the potential for shareholder or customer concern.
3.1a Please describe (i) the current and/or future risks to your operations, (ii) the ways in which these risks
affect or could affect your operations before taking action, (iii) the estimated timescale of these risks, and
(iv) your current or proposed strategies for managing them.
Our questionnaire: Risk assessment
34
Country or
region
River basin
Risk type
Potential
business
impact
Estimated
timescale
(years)
Risk management
strategies
Company-wide
Country drop down
list
Other: text box
River Basin drop
down list
Not known
Other: text box
1. Physical options
2. Regulatory options
3. Other options
[plain text entry:
2400 characters]
Current
1-5
6-10
11-20
>20
Unknown
[plain text entry: 2400
characters]
Add Row
QUESTIONS (3.1) AND (3.1A): CURRENT RISK
Physical Risks – Quantity
Physical Risks – Quality
Regulatory & Reputational Risks
QUESTIONS (3.1) AND (3.1A): FUTURE RISKS
PROJECTED CHANGE
IN WATER STRESS
Consultation
Timeline
{ CDP 2013 Water Questionnaire
{ 27 June: Deadline for corporations to submit their water response
{ October: Publicly disclosed data will be published on our website
{ The questionnaire is changing
{ Greater structure and logic
{ Facilitate better disclosure
{ Ease communication of the actions taken to increase
resiliency to future water challenges
{ Enable you to demonstrate a deeper understanding of water
risks and opportunities
{ Scoring will be introduced
{ 2014 private pilot with Global 500 companies only
{ 2015 all responses will be scored
Changes are underway for 2014
39
HOW TO SUBMIT QUESTIONS
If the viewing panel is minimized, press
the orange arrow to expand it
To submit a question,
write your question in this
box and press ‘send’
Thank you for joining!
Contact us:
Paul Reig, preig@wri.org
Cate Lamb, cate.lamb@cdp.net
wri.org/aqueduct cdproject.net

More Related Content

Aqueduct CDP Corporate Water Disclosure Webinar (8 May 2013)

  • 1. Aqueduct for Corporate Water Disclosure May 8 2013, 11:00am - 12:00pm EST Paul Reig, WRI Aqueduct Cate Lamb, CDP Water
  • 2. HOW TO SUBMIT QUESTIONS If the viewing panel is minimized, press the orange arrow to expand it To submit a question, write your question in this box and press ‘send’
  • 3. AGENDA  The Aqueduct Project – Paul Reig  Aqueduct for Corporate Water Management – Paul Reig  Corporate Water Disclosure – Cate Lamb  CDP Water 2013 Questionnaire – Cate Lamb & Paul Reig  Q&A
  • 4. AQUEDUCT PROJECT CORPORATE WATER MANAGEMENT Paul Reig, WRI Aqueduct
  • 5. WATER SUPPLY CRISES RISK TOPS IMPACT AND LIKELIHOOD
  • 6. Photo: flickr/r~p~m Source: National Geographic Photo: flickr/zen WATER RISKS TO: GOVERNMENTS COMPANIES INVESTORS
  • 7. DETAILED, COMPARABLE, GLOBAL WATER RISK INFORMATION Photo: NASA
  • 9. UNDERSTANDING RISK: AQUEDUCT FRAMEWORK  Baseline water stress  Inter-annual variability  Seasonal variability  Flood occurrence  Drought severity  Upstream storage  Groundwater stress Physical Risk: QUANTITY Overall Water Risk  Media coverage  Access to water  Threatened amphibians Regulatory & Reputational Risk  Return flow ratio  Upstream protected land Physical Risk: QUALITY
  • 11. AQUEDUCT: MEASURING EXPOSURE TO WATER RISK 1 • Select Weights 2 • Import locations 3 • Export results
  • 21. AQUEDUCT: CORPORATE WATER MANAGEMENT Sources: WBCSD (2012) Water For Business Version 3
  • 24. {{ {{ To catalyse action on corporate water stewardship to safeguard precious water resources Vision, CDP Water Program
  • 25. Investor interest in water is rising CDP’s Water Signatories CDP’s Water Signatories Assets 25 Water 2013 530investor signatories US$57 trillion in assets
  • 26. What do your investors and customers want to know? { Would interuption in the supply of good quality water result in substantive interuption to your business? { Are any of your critical suppliers or business inputs exposed to water risks? { How confident are you that you will have access to the quantity and quality of water required to operate now and in the future? How resilient is your business in the face of water challenges?
  • 27. Questionnaire sent to 1,039 companies in 2013 Companies outside these sectors and regions are welcome to respond voluntarily; to register email respond@cdproject.net Targeted industry sectors include: • apparel • chemicals • food & beverage • metals & mining • oil & gas • pharmaceuticals • power generation • semiconductors Global 500 ASX 100 JSE 100 S&P 500
  • 28. CDP WATER 2013 QUESTIONNAIRE Cate Lamb, CDP Water Paul Reig, WRI Aqueduct
  • 29. 2013 Water Questionnaire Water management & governance Risks & opportunities Water accounting
  • 30. 2.1 Are any of your operations located in water-stressed regions? 2.2 Are there other indicators (besides water stress) which you wish to report which help you to identify which of your operations are located in regions subject to water-related risk? 2.5 Do any of your key inputs or raw materials (excluding water) come from regions subject to water-related risk? Our questionnaire: Risk indicators 30 Country or region River basin Risk Indicator Proportion of operations located in this region (%) Further comments Country drop down list Other: text box River Basin drop down list Not known Other: text box Flooding Poor water quality Tightening of regulations Poor enforcement of regulations Inadequate water infrastructure Inadequate access to water and sanitation Other: text box 0 1-10 11-20 21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 [plain text entry: 2400 characters] Add Row
  • 32. QUESTIONS (2.2) (2.5): WATER-RELATED RISK Physical Risks – Quantity Physical Risks – Quality Regulatory & Reputational Risks
  • 33. 3.1 Is your company exposed to water-related risks (current or future) that have the potential to generate a substantive change in your business operation, revenue or expenditure? Our questionnaire: Risk assessment 33 Substantive change What constitutes a substantive change will vary between companies. (a) the proportion of business units affected; (b) the size of the impact on those business units, and (c) the potential for shareholder or customer concern.
  • 34. 3.1a Please describe (i) the current and/or future risks to your operations, (ii) the ways in which these risks affect or could affect your operations before taking action, (iii) the estimated timescale of these risks, and (iv) your current or proposed strategies for managing them. Our questionnaire: Risk assessment 34 Country or region River basin Risk type Potential business impact Estimated timescale (years) Risk management strategies Company-wide Country drop down list Other: text box River Basin drop down list Not known Other: text box 1. Physical options 2. Regulatory options 3. Other options [plain text entry: 2400 characters] Current 1-5 6-10 11-20 >20 Unknown [plain text entry: 2400 characters] Add Row
  • 35. QUESTIONS (3.1) AND (3.1A): CURRENT RISK Physical Risks – Quantity Physical Risks – Quality Regulatory & Reputational Risks
  • 36. QUESTIONS (3.1) AND (3.1A): FUTURE RISKS PROJECTED CHANGE IN WATER STRESS
  • 38. Timeline { CDP 2013 Water Questionnaire { 27 June: Deadline for corporations to submit their water response { October: Publicly disclosed data will be published on our website
  • 39. { The questionnaire is changing { Greater structure and logic { Facilitate better disclosure { Ease communication of the actions taken to increase resiliency to future water challenges { Enable you to demonstrate a deeper understanding of water risks and opportunities { Scoring will be introduced { 2014 private pilot with Global 500 companies only { 2015 all responses will be scored Changes are underway for 2014 39
  • 40. HOW TO SUBMIT QUESTIONS If the viewing panel is minimized, press the orange arrow to expand it To submit a question, write your question in this box and press ‘send’
  • 41. Thank you for joining! Contact us: Paul Reig, preig@wri.org Cate Lamb, cate.lamb@cdp.net wri.org/aqueduct cdproject.net

Editor's Notes

  1. Talk about Aqueduct project and step-by-step process of how the tool can be used for corporate water management
  2. World Economic Forum 2013 Global Risks reportFor the second year in a rowWater was among the top 5 risks (at the top of the chart) – most likely to occur; and highest impact
  3. Risks to governments, companies and investorsAqueduct was launched in response to corporate and investor concern in exposure to risks across operations and supply chainsFloods in Thailand impacted automotive industry in Japan and USATexas drought drove up cotton prices leading to financial impacts to major clothing brands Increasing demands in megacities has lead companies to truck in water Risk materialize and investors know it – they want to know where, why and what is being done about it
  4. WRI Aqueduct launched new information global, up-do-date and comparable
  5. Information displayed in the form of maps, to accurately capture the details and particularities of water and how these vary across basins, regions, countries, in a visual and comprehensive form, translating complex hydrological information into actionable information that can be understood by corporates, investors and other stakeholders
  6. Because there are many sources of risk, Aqueduct chose to use a framework of indicators that would account for many of these and aggregate them into three main categories based on how companies perceive the risks – quantity, quality, regulatory and reputational Indicators include measures of water stress (most important), also variability in supply, storage, flood, drought, groundwater stress and others. Additionally, Aqueduct also provides estimate of the future conditions, via indicators of projected change in water stress computed using scenarios of supply and demand changes based on IPCC climate change scenarios and socioeconomic growth patterns
  7. All of this information is publicly available on our project website, where it can be used to evaluate exposure to risk across operations or supply chains as well as downloaded for free and used internally by companies, governments, investors or academics The next few slides will explain how to use the Aqueduct tool to evaluate your companies exposure to risk
  8. Three steps
  9. First go to project website at www.wri.org/aqueductClick on map
  10. Enter the tool – 1st step is to select weights based on industry, these will determine the importance of each indicator and drive the aggregation of these into aggregated scores of quality, quantity and reg rep. This can be done from the drop down menu on the water risk indicators panel on the top right The tool allows for customization of weights but not recommended
  11. Second, once you have set the weights, you will need to import information on the location of your facilities, assets or suppliers, depending on what part of your organization or value chain you intent to assess for exposure to risk For that bottom left side, analyze location panel
  12. Click on import locations, and import coordinates or addresses from excel document, by copy and pasting
  13. Once you paste the locations, the tool is ready to geo-reference them, click “add locations”
  14. Tool automatically populates the location information and provides you with the results for each individual indicators. These can be vizualized in the panel below, sorted from high to lowFor each location it also provides the country and major watershed
  15. One can click on any given location to obtain the information
  16. And most importantly you can export the results onto your computer and save them as an excel document
  17. Exel is quite simple, includes location name, country, catchment and results for each indicator and aggregated scores (these will have been calculated based on the selection of weights) Results include level of risk, score 1-5, as well as the raw value for that indicator
  18. So what can be done with this type of information, information on the water risk landscape surrounding your assets or suppliers? Most importantly it characterized the water use and intensity, putting into context the relationship between internal water use and efficiency and the surrounding environment (including naturally occurring variables as well as other demands) From the corproate water management cycle proposed by WBCSD, we see that information of this type can help in three of the 5 distinct steps of this process: assessing global and local water situation,Identifying water risks and opportunities (by combining with water use, intensity and discharge data)Finally, helping communicate this information to internal and external environmental, financial and other stakeholders, also know as disclosure Today’s webinar is going to focus on how Aqueduct can help report water risk to CDP water, the main vehicle for corporate disclosure around waterWith that I will pass the floor to Cate Lamb, head of water, for CDP Water based in London.
  19. High to extremely high
  20. Question 2.2 – other indicators, depends on companyQuestion 2.5, referring to inputs and raw materials, can be answer by plotting key sources and suppliers and evaluating which of their locations are exposed to high levels of water risk, looking first at aggregated scores to evaluate overall exposure to risk, then determine the source of risk using the 12 metrics
  21. Question 3.1 – substantive change depends on company, exposure to water-related risk can be determined as discussed, first aggregated score and then determining the source of risk by indicator Question 3.1a – same; results help you fill out the three first columns: country, basin name and risk type
  22. As far as future water-related risks, at this point Aqueduct can help evaluate future exposure to increased water stress, working on flood, drought and supply variability, not yet available. The results of future stress metrics are also in the excel document, at the endAlthough only one of many types of risk, water stress is central and critical to understanding water-related risk and is a key indicator for other water issues likely to be present in that area due to high levels of demand relative to supply – good metric to identify future risks