CHAPTER 1 THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4
CHAPTER 2 THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Esther 2:19-3:6
CHAPTER 3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5
CHAPTER 4 MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET 1
CHAPTER 5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based onHeb.10:32-34
CHAPTER 6 THE FOLLY OF THE WISE Based on I King 11:1-13
CHAPTER 7 THE POWER OF NEGATIVE THINKING Isa. 1:1-17
CHAPTER 8 GOOD OUT OF EVIL PART II Based on James 1:12
CHAPTER 9 THE PERPLEXITY OF PLEASURE Based on Eccles.2:1
CHAPTER10 THE PLEASURE OF PERSPECTIVE Based on Psalm 84
CHAPTER11 THE PLEASURE OF PAIN BASED ON PSALM 84:6
CHAPTER12 GUILT CAN BE GOOD BASED ON PSALM 32:1-5
1 of 72
More Related Content
Bible paradoxes
1. BIBLE PARADOXES
By Glenn Pease
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1 THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4
CHAPTER 2 THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Esther 2:19-3:6
CHAPTER 3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5
CHAPTER 4 MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET 1
CHAPTER 5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based onHeb.10:32-34
CHAPTER 6 THE FOLLY OF THE WISE Based on I King 11:1-13
CHAPTER 7 THE POWER OF NEGATIVE THINKING Isa. 1:1-17
CHAPTER 8 GOOD OUT OF EVIL PART II Based on James 1:12
CHAPTER 9 THE PERPLEXITY OF PLEASURE Based on Eccles.2:1
CHAPTER10 THE PLEASURE OF PERSPECTIVE Based on Psalm 84
CHAPTER11 THE PLEASURE OF PAIN BASED ON PSALM 84:6
CHAPTER12 GUILT CAN BE GOOD BASED ON PSALM 32:1-5
INTRODUCTION
Paradox and perspective
Para means contrary and doxa means opinion, and so a paradox deals with contrary
opinions or ideas which are seemingly so opposite they cannot both be true, but which are, in
fact, both true. They sound contradictory but the really compliment each other. In paradox
two opposite and contradictory ideas can be shown to be two parts of a greater whole larger
than either of them alone. Two men can be looking at a shield from each side of it, and one
says it is gold and the other that it is a silver shield. Both know they are right for they are
looking at it right in front of their face. They can argue for ever and never convince the
other to change their view. They can only resolve their conflict by going to the other side and
seeing that a shield can be gold on one side and silver on the other. Both were right, but both
were wrong too, because they only saw part of the whole truth about the shield.
The false assumption is many conflicts is that if one side is certain they are right, any
contrary idea must be wrong. This is false because it is possible for both to be right even
though they seem contradictory. Paradox says that opposite perspectives can both be right.
For example, when Durand, the Frenchman, visited London he saw such places as Waterloo
station and Trafalgar square. He said to his wife, “These English are really odd, they seem to
have a mania for naming places after defeats.” From his perspective as a Frenchman these
2. were defeats, but Waterloo and Trafalgar were great victories for the English. He failed to
recognize that a battle can be both a defeat and a victory, just as every sports event is both a
win and a loss, for their are always two sides. We need to recognize the same thing can be
seen from more than one perspective.
Take a snowstorm as an illustration. A family of 4 can see it from 4 different perspectives.
The mother sees the snow as a source of beauty as she looks out of her picture window and
sees her evergreens beautified with the white fluffy stuff. The father sees it as a nuisance as
he has to shovel the drive way and be late for work because of the traffic mess. The son sees
it as a source of income because the neighbors will pay him to shovel for them. The little girl
sees it as a source of fun, for now she can use the new sled she got for her birthday. What
could be more futile than a debate to determine which of them is right? Three of them find
pleasure, and only one finds pain in the snow, and so can the issue be decided by majority
vote? This would not change the fact that the father still has to suffer while the other three
enjoy it. We need to face it. It is a paradox. A snowfall is both pleasure and pain. It is both
beautiful and a nuisance. You cannot get everybody on the same side, for their are two sides,
and both are real and legitimate.
When Mark Twain visited Whistler in his studio he started to touch a certain painting.
Whistler cried out, “Don’t touch that, it isn’t dry yet!” “I don’t mind,” said Twain, “I have
gloves on.” They were on two different channels, and Mark
Twain missed the point completely. He was not being sensitive to the perspective of Whistler
who was concerned about his painting being ruined, and not about getting paint on Twain’s
finger. Paul in Phil. 2:4 wrote, “Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but
also to the interests of others.” In other words, recognize their are other perspectives than
your own, and you need to be sensitive to them or you will be a self-centered person.
Life is full of paradoxes. If you look at a stick in the water you see it as crooked. You know
it is a straight stick, and yet it is bent to your vision. You are certain it is straight and yet you
cannot see it as straight in the water. No matter how clearly you have it explained why it
looks bent you cannot see it straight. Mentally you know it is, but visually you experience it
as not straight. And so you have a paradox of a straight stick that is crooked because both
are real at the same time.
This reality can help a person escape prejudice. He may have been taught that other races
are inferior to his, and so he cannot help but see them that way. But if he recognizes the
reality of paradox, he can learn that what he sees is like that crooked stick. It is an illusion
created by circumstance, but it is not objective reality. Other races are proven to be equal
with his, and so he may have feeling left from his training that makes him see others in a bent
way, but he can also know that what he feels is not the truth, and thereby overcome the
subjective feeling and chose to act in accord with objective truth.
We have to fight the tendency constantly of seeing reality only from our perspective. The
poet gives an example.
When offspring roll upon the floor,
And kick their heels in rage,
3. They either need a spanking or
Their going through a stage,
Depending, with distinction fine,
On whether they are yours or mine.
We tend to see through eyes which favor ourselves at the expense of others. Identical
behavior on our part is seen as a virtue, which in others we see as a vice. We are thrifty, but
they are stingy. We have firm convictions, but they are stubborn as a mule. We are cautious,
but they are slow pokes. We are courteous, but the other guy is a brown noser. We are
zealous, but the other guy is a fanatic. We see ourselves as virtuous in doing the same things
that other are doing, but which we call vices.
Men are forever debating whether we should be right wing or left wing, when it should be
conspicuous to everyone that God never made a bird yet with only one wing. They would
never get off the ground if he did. It does not have to be one or the other, but we need the
whole bird, and the perspectives of both the conservative mind and the liberal mind to get
the whole picture. Anyone who is always just one or the other is narrow minded and does not
deal with the real world. Dr. Billy Graham said that he was a conservative theologically, and
a liberal socially. Can you be both a liberal and a conservative? Why not? It is no more
unreasonable than the fact that a day is made up of both daytime and nighttime. They are
opposites, but they are both real and a part of the whole. Man is not a saint or a sinner, but a
saint and a sinner. He is both even though they are opposites. If you are going to deal with
the whole man you need to see the reality of this paradox. Pascal saw it and said, “Man is the
glory and scum of the universe.”
1. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther
2:1-4
Alexander Selkirk was one of those men who always had to
learn the hard way. The records of his church in Scotland show
that he was disciplined several times for causing trouble in the
church. In May of 1703 he said good-bye to all that, and at age
27 went off to sea. He tried to run things on the ship as he
did church, and he got into a furious argument with the Captain.
They were anchored off a small island four hundred miles from
Chile.
Alexander got so mad he packed up his possessions and went
ashore. "You don't dare sail without me," he shouted to the
Captain. The Captain was not impressed with his conviction, and
gave the order to sail. Poor Alexander could not believe it.
He thought he was indispensable. He was waiting out up to his
arm pits pleading for the Captain to forgive him, but the
Captain was as stubborn as he was, and he sailed away, never to
return.
Fortunately for Alexander the island had been inhabited by
Jon Fernandez two centuries earlier, and he had left some goats
4. on the island. These gave him food and skins. For four years
and four months he depended on them for survival. When he was
finally rescued, he could hardly remember how to talk. When he
got back to England he was a sensation, and several books were
written about him. The most famous was fiction, but it used his
experience as a model. The book was Robinson Crusoe.
That was a tough way to learn to keep his mouth shut. It
is so hard not to do something, or say something foolish or
destructive when you are angry. Even great men often have to
learn the hard way that loss of temper can be costly. Xerxes
was the ruler of the Persian Empire, he could have anything he
pleased, but he lost his wife, whom he truly treasured, because
of his anger. Xerxes had a reputation for losing his temper
when he could not have his own way. He once wanted to cross the
waters of the hellespont, but it was so rough his troops could
not build a bridge. He got so angry he took chains to the
water, and he began to flog it. Like most temper tantrums, it
was not very effective.
It is so hard to play God when nature and others will not
cooperate. The water would not stop for him, and his wife would
not start for him, and he blew his stack. And why shouldn't he?
He was the most powerful man in the world, and why should he not
get angry for the same reason the rest of us get angry? Why do
we get angry? Primarily because something or someone has
spoiled our pleasure. We are not different from King Xerxes.
He had his heart set on seeing all his noble leaders gape in
envy as he revealed the beauty of his wife to them. Half the
joy of possessing something is in showing it to those who don't.
Vashti had the audacity to rob him of this pleasure. He blazed
with anger within, because she would not grant his whim.
If you examine your own life, you will discover that most
of your anger is based on the hindrance of your pleasure. You
have plans, and somebody does not cooperate, and the pleasure
you hope for is lost, and you are angry. Children cry most
often because they can't have their own way. Somebody is always
hindering them from having their pleasure. They want to play
with the new camera you just bought, and you insist it is not a
toy, and there heart is broken. They want to run barefoot in a
junk infested lot, and you deny them of their pleasure. On and
on goes the list of pleasures a child desires that are
constantly being hindered by parents, who get no pleasure out of
picking up pieces of a two hundred dollar camera, and rushing to
the emergency room for stitches.
What we see then, is that from the beginning, life is a
battle to see whose pleasures are met, and whose are denied.
Striving for pleasure is a far more powerful factor in all of
our lives then we realize. Because we do not examine our lives
from the perspective of the pleasure motive, we look on the
events of the book of Esther with some degree of shock.
It is scandalous that every beautiful virgin in the empire was
to be made available to the king, to meet his demand for
pleasure. Keep in mind, he is the most powerful man in the
world. The whole book revolves around his pleasure. What
pleases him determines the life or death of every human being of
5. his time. If he pleases, whole nations are destroyed,
and if he pleases, they are spared. God's providence had to
work through His pleasure motive.
The first two chapters reveal that he was dominated by
sensual pleasure. His party life and sex life established the
environment in which the entire story takes place. Xerxes is no
different than the rulers of that part of the world today. A
reporter who traveled to all of the oil rich Arab countries, and
interviewed all of the kings and sheiks, reported that
they lived just like Xerxes did. Wine, women, and song, and
every pleasure man is capable of was a way of life. Xerxes is
said to have offered a reward for anyone who could invent a new
pleasure. This is the challenge today for those who have so
much money they cannot think of any new way of spending it.
The book of Esther is not dealing with something old and
irrelevant, but rather, with a subject so real and relevant to
all of us, but one that we often fail to think about seriously,
the subject of pleasure. Before we get all bent out of shape
about Xerxes, and his lust for pleasure, lets examine our own
lives. When we do, we will discover that we are not so
different from this sensual king. The main difference is that
we do not have the power and wealth to command the pleasures he
had, but the difference is really only one of degree.
We too enjoy parties with good things to eat and drink, and we
enjoy beautiful furniture and drapes. We enjoy nice clothes,
and I have seldom heard of a Christian who does not enjoy sexual
pleasure.
The more we examine the Christian life, the more we begin
to realize we are very pleasure oriented. We don't feel the
lest guilt for enjoying the pleasure of music, fellowship, an
all that being a part of the body of Christ involves. Why
should we? Jesus enjoyed the social pleasures of His time. He
enjoyed the party, the wedding, the feasting,
the singing, the fun of fishing, and fellowship. So what we
have is, the paradox of pleasure.
It is both something we are to crave and seek and enjoy, and yet
it is something that can be so dangerous that it can quickly
lead us to fall, and be out of the will of God. Pleasure is
both a virtue and a vice.
The search for pleasure is the primary motivation behind
the evil of man. Satan appealed to the pleasure nature to get
man to fall. He said, taste the forbidden fruit and you will
have the pleasure of being like God, and they jumped at the
chance. But good is also motivated by pleasure. The Gospel is
an appeal to the pleasure nature as well, for Jesus says, "Come
unto me all ye who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give
you rest."
Jesus offers men the joy of eternal life, and the pleasure of
abundant life. There is not available anywhere in the world a
hope for greater pleasure than what Jesus offers those
who put their faith in Him.
What this means is we cannot afford to be reacting as
Christians so often do. They look at Xerxes, and his six months
6. banquet of gluttony, drunkenness, and perpetual beautiful
virgins for his lust, and they say this is disgusting. Then
they think their mission in life should be to prevent as much
pleasure as possible. This over reaction to evil pleasure in
the world has caused Christians to totally misrepresent Christ,
and pervert the Gospel so that it loses its appeal to most
everyone but sadist who delight in pain. History is full of the
folly of Christian ascetics, who thought they pleased God by
pain rather pleasure.
They wore hair shirts to itch and be miserable. They flogged
themselves thinking that suffering was the key to
sanctification. Fun and pleasure were so related to sin that
misery
and boredom were exalted to the level of virtues.
To avoid this reaction to worldly pleasure we need to see
where the Bible stands on the issue of pleasure. The first
thing we see, as we examine God's Word, is that God is the
Creator of pleasure. He made the world and man, and said it is
very good, and He took pleasure in all that He had made. He
made man with a nervous system capable of enjoying much pleasure
of sight, sound, taste, smell, and feeling. He designed man to
be a pleasure loving creature. Every pleasure we are capable of
is a cause to thank God, for it is by His will we have that
capacity. David acknowledges God as the source of all of life's
pleasures in Psa. 36:7-8. "How precious is thy steadfast love,
O God! The children of men take refuge in the shadow of thy
wings. They feast on the abundance of thy house, and thou
givest them drink from the rivers of thy pleasures."
God gives rivers of pleasure, even in time, before the
believers dwell by the River of Life, where all pain will be
forever gone, and life will be endless pleasure, for, "At God's
right hand our pleasures for ever more." (Psa. 16:11). God
delights in the pleasures of His servants says Psa. 35:27. God
is a personality who enjoys great pleasure Himself.
Psa. 149:4 says, "For the Lord takes pleasure in His people."
As we, as parents and grandparents, take pleasure in seeing our
children grow and develop, so God delights in His children.
God wanted the temple rebuilt in Jerusalem, and He said to
the people in Hag. 1:8,
"Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house, that I
may take pleasure in it and that I may appear in my glory, says
the Lord." God is no where revealed as a vast cosmic machine.
God is a person who feels, and His goal is to accomplish what is
good and pleasurable. Phil. 2:13 says, "For God is at work in
you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure." Jesus
said in Luke 12:32, "Fear not, little flock, for it is your
Father's
good pleasure to give you the kingdom."
Let's get it straight in our minds, God is not a sadist who
loves pain and delights in suffering . The goal of God is
pleasure for Himself, and for all His people. He makes it clear
in Ezek. 18:23. "Have I any pleasure in the death of the
wicked, says the Lord God,
and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?"
7. God's goal for every man is a goal of pleasure. Hell is pain
and heaven is pleasure, and heaven is always God's goal.
I looked in a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms, and found
this list of the opposites of pleasure. Listen to them, and see
if you catch the flow of heaven or hell.
Displeasure Evil Desolation
Sorrow Pain Anxiety
Woe Hurt Burden
Grief Wound Adversity
Suffering Affliction Trouble
Vexation Anguish Unhappiness
Worry Despair Tribulation
Sickness Misfortune
This is not an ideal shopping list for Christmas, or any
other day in life. In fact, the
only place you can get that list fulfilled perfectly is in hell.
Not a one of them will be a part of heaven. So we are stuck
with an enormous paradox. The entire plan of God, and the goal
of Christians, is pleasure. Yet, that seems to be the major
problem of sinful man, and the primary method of worldliness.
Even Plato could see it and say, "Pleasure is the greatest
incentive to evil." It is the pleasure principle that leads men
into every form of lust, and which takes them lower than the
beast. Yet, it is the pleasure principle that leads men to the
highest levels of godliness, and enables them to fulfill the
purpose of God.
The book of Esther is a perfect illustration of the paradox
of pleasure. It begins with a feast that is dedicated to
worldly pleasure, and gratification of the senses. It ends with
the proclamation of a perpetual feast that will also gratify the
senses, but will be in thanksgiving for the providence of God.
The pleasure of the people of God at a banquet
is no less enjoyable than that of the sensuous secularist.
Xerxes had more of every sensual pleasure, but the fact is, he
did not enjoy eating, sexuality, and other aesthetic
pleasures anymore than the Jews did, or than Christians do
today.
How then can we distinguish between pleasures which are
displeasing to God, and those which please Him? How can we
unravel this paradox so we know which side we are on?
How can we know if we are at Xerxes's banquet, or Esther's
banquet? The first thing we need to do is to recognize pleasure
is not evil. It is good, and from God. Then we need to
recognize that all good can be perverted and abused. That is
what evil is-it is good used in a way that God never intended.
C. S. Lewis in The Screwtape Letters has the Sr. devil
writing to the Jr. devil explaining the work of temptation. He
writes, "Never forget that when we are dealing with any pleasure
in its healthy and normal and satisfying form, we are, in a
sense, on the Enemy's
ground. I know we have won many a soul through pleasure. All
the same, it is His invention, not ours. He made the pleasures;
all our research so far has not enabled us to produce one. All
we can do is to encourage the humans to take the pleasures which
8. our
Enemy has produced, at times, or in ways, or in degrees, which
he has forbidden."
The tempters task is to get men to think, if a little is
good, a lot must be better. If he can get men to use God's
pleasures to excess, he can get them hooked, so that the very
gifts of God become idols, that lead them astray from God. Such
is the subtle plan of the deceiver, and it is a very effective
plan. We live in a culture where pleasure is no longer
a gift from God, for it has become god. Norman Lobsenz has
written a book titled,
Is Anybody Happy. It is a study of the American search for
pleasure. The goal of life for
Americans is a good time. Our national Mecca is Disney World.
Pleasure is the alpha and omega of life. The national heroes
are no longer the titans of industry, or the somber statesman,
or solitary inventors. Now it is the movie star, the sports
hero, and international playboy, who have taken their place.
The important thing now is to have fun. Lobsenz writes,
"Advertisers, never slow to sense a trend, have leaped on the
bandwagon, and there is now hardly an artifact or an activity
that is not intimately connected with spine-tingling happiness.
Brushing your teeth with a certain tooth paste, of course-is
fun. Cutting the grass-with a certain lawnmower-is exciting.
Do you want to know the real joy of good living? Drink a
certain beer....soap flakes give glamorous suds. It is fun to
paint your house with so and so's paint. Eye glasses are
bewitching. Light bulbs are romantic. Building materials are
festive. Soft drinks are sociable. Kitchen appliances are
smart. Anything you buy that is made of shining aluminum will
mirror your laughter. Even paying the bills for these items is
a pleasure if you have an account at a certain bank." Lobsenz
says he expects someday to see a billboard with the bony finger
of Uncle Sam pointing at him asking, "Have you had your fun
today?"
We are under a new morality-the fun morality. It says, if
it feels good do it. It is not new of course, for Xerxes was a
pro at it 2,500 years ago. Instead of feeling ashamed for
having too much pleasure, from now on we are to feel guilty if
we do not have enough. People are now going to psychiatrist and
asking, "What is wrong with me? I can't let go and have enough
fun." People feel so obligated to have fun they attack it with
all the energy they use to put into achievement. This pursuit
of pleasure often ends in broken marriages, broken lives, and
death, especially for those who find their pleasure in alcohol
and other drugs.
Is the Christian approach to try and be a kill joy, and
oppose pleasure, and call people back to a work ethic, where go
go go is the battle cry? Not at all! The Christian is for
pleasure too, for that is God's plan for man. The Christian
simply needs to point out the folly of making pleasure an idol.
It is not the end of life, but a means to a higher end.
"Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever." We
are into pleasure too, but because it is not an end in itself,
9. but a means to the end of enjoying God, we have an objective
standard by which we measure the value of all pleasures. In
other words, we count the cost. Satan does not want man to
count the cost, for his whole strategy is to get men to choose
pleasure at any cost. The cost factor is what enables the
Christian to have a guide to legitimate pleasure. You can tell
if you are being excessive in your pursuit of pleasure by what
it is costing you.
Any pleasure that costs you your growth in Christian
fruitfulness is folly, and excessive pleasure. Jesus made this
clear in the parable of the sower, where the seed that fell
among the thorns did not lead to fruitfulness. He tells us in
Luke 8:14, "There are those who hear, but as they go on their
way they are choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of
life, and their fruit does not mature." They pay too much for
their pleasure. They lose the highest pleasure of life-the
pleasure of pleasing God, and being what He wills, for the sake
of pleasure that will pass away. They trade in their diamonds
for marbles.
The Gospel is not a call to forsake pleasure, but it is a
call to rise to higher pleasure,
and to enjoy that which lasts forever. The motive for all self-denial,
which keeps the Christian from immoral pleasure, is the
hope for enduring pleasure. Listen to Paul giving counsel to
the rich Christians who could so easily indulge themselves in
excessive pleasures. He writes in I Tim. 6:17-19, "As for the
rich in this world, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set
their hope on uncertain riches but on God who richly furnishes
us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in
good deeds, liberal and generous,
thus laying up for themselves a good foundation for the future.
So that they may take hold of the life which is life indeed."
Paul is saying, you only go around once in this life, so do
it with gusto. But for Paul, that does not mean to drink beer,
it means to enjoy the higher and lasting pleasures of doing the
will of God, which guarantees we will have abundant life now,
and an eternal life of pleasure on the highest level. The
Christian is one who evaluates pleasure, and does not just grab
at it indiscriminately. He asks, does this enlarge, or does it
enrich my Christian life, and my attitude of gratitude to God?
The Christian is on the greatest pleasure trip possible. If we
could not assert that the plan of Christ leads to the greatest
pleasure for the greatest number, we would be saying that there
is a better way. The fact is, no one even pretends to offer a
better way than Christ. We can say with the advertisers who are
confident of their products, "If you can find a better way than
Christ-take it."
When referring to God, it is an absolute truth that Father
knows best. He forbids only those forms of pleasure which, in
the long run, lead to pain greater than the pleasure.
God never forbids any pleasure which will last, and be a part of
your growth toward the goal of becoming like Him. He only
forbids that which costs too much. Forbidden pleasure is a rip
off. It costs you the favor of God, and usually has a kick back
10. of pain that far exceeds the pleasure. How often people take
drugs to feel good, only to end up in jail or worse, and feeling
rotten, and with problems that are now worse than before.
Biblical morality is a fight back morality. It is a demand that
you don't be a sucker, and get ripped off by cheap imitations.
Jesus Christ, and He alone, offers the real thing-life
abundant and life eternal. He paid and enormous cost, and
endured the pains of hell, that we might enjoy the pleasures of
heaven. Whatever price we need to pay to be loyal to Him is
small cost for so great a gift.
The martyr who suffers death rather than deny Christ, does so
for pleasure. He knows the cost is nothing compared to what he
will enjoy at Christ's right hand. That is why one of
my favorite preachers, F. W. Boreham, said, "The tragedy of the
age is not that people are getting too much pleasure, but that
they are not getting enough." Life Xerxes, the world is
pleasure mad, but in all of their sensual self-indulgence, they
do not find the pleasure of peace and meaning, or eternal hope.
They pursue pleasure as a god, and are left empty. The
Christian pursues the will of God, and is filled with pleasure.
The world grabs the rose and clutches and thus must bare
the pains of the thorn. The Christian does not need to grasp
it, but can enjoy it, and not cling, for he knows he cannot lose
the rose even if it dies, for he is a child of the rose's
Creator, and knows the rose will be his forever. Honey is
bought to dear by those who risk the bees stingers. The
Christian is one who is wise in his pleasure seeking. He
enjoys all God has given us to enjoy, but avoiding excess and
the forbidden, knowing this leads to the greatest pleasure.
Contrary to the view that Christianity is opposed to the
search for pleasure, the opposite is the case. We have found
the very thing man is searching for, the way to the highest most
lasting pleasure of which man is capable. With this highest
goal of salvation settled, the Christian then can enjoy the
lesser pleasures of life more completely, for they are not so
essential that he has to cling to them for meaning. The highest
and permanent
being assured in Christ, he can relax, and enjoy the passing
without the risk of idolatry.
To sum it up, the paradox of pleasure is that the pursuit
of pleasure can lead you to the pit of hell, or to the pinnacle
of heaven. It is life's most dangerous or delightful path to
travel.
The ecstasy of victory, or the agony of defeat, awaits all who
travel it. Which you find depends on whether Xerxes is your
example, or Jesus Christ. You either do what pleases you with
no higher loyalty than your own pleasure, or you do what pleases
God, with His will as your motive for rejecting or accepting
pleasure. Those who choose the way of Christ, saying, not my
will but thine be done, will enjoy at God's right hand pleasure
for ever more.
11. 2. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther
2:19-3:6
Newscaster Paul Harvey, some years ago, told his radio
listeners this remarkable story from World War II. From the
Island of Guam one of our mighty B-29 bombers took off for
Kokura, Japan. It was carrying deadly cargo as it circled high
above the city. A cloud covered the city, so the plane kept
circling for half an hour, and then for three quarters of an
hour, and finally after 55 minutes the gas supply was reaching
the danger zone. The plane had to leave its primary target, and
go to a secondary target where the sky was clear. Then the
command could be given, "Bombs away!"
Only weeks later did the military receive information that
chilled many a heart. Thousands of allied prisoners of war, the
largest concentration of Americans in enemy hands, had been
moved to Kokura a week before the bombing mission. Had it not
been for that cloud, thousands of Americans now alive would have
been killed, for that B-29 was carrying the world's second
atomic bomb. It was taken instead to the secondary target-
Nagasaki.
The direction history takes, so often is determined by such
minor things. Small things play a big role in life. The
illustrations of this are numerous, yet it is a truth that
demands balance, or it leads to folly. God's providence is
constantly working through little things,
but not every little thing is of significance. To think so can
lead to becoming neurotic, for you will search for meaning in
every trivial event of life. The danger of this is illustrated
by the little girl who came running into her house sobbing. She
threw herself into her mothers arms, and cried out, "God doesn't
love me anymore!" The mother was shocked and puzzled at what
could produce such a crisis. "Why do you say that?" she asked,
assuring her that God does love her. "No mother!" she wailed.
"I know He doesn't love me. I tried Him with a daisy." In case
you have never tried that less than fool proof method of
predicting love, by pulling off petals to, "He loves me, he
loves me not," let me recommend that you never start, if you
are going to take it seriously.
The fact is, there are little things that are just little
things. They are minor and insignificant. They are not subtle
and hidden methods by which great things are accomplished. I
don't think it is a healthy exercise to go through life trying
to figure out if God is trying to say something through every
minor event. When God does work through such events, it is only
known as we look back and see the minor event as a link in the
chain that leads to the fulfillment of His purpose.
This is what we see in the life of Mordecai. As a cloud
saved many Americans, so a conversation saved many Jews.
Mordecai over heard a couple of the kings servants plotting to
assassinate him. This was very common in the ancient world,
because the only way to get rid of an absolute monarch was by
assassination. They never quit, and could not be voted out, and
12. so violence was the only method open for change. Many of kings
of Persians were assassinated, including Xerxes. He was saved
by Mordecai, but fourteen years later one of his servants
succeeded in his plot to kill him.
Assassination was common even in Israel. In I Kings 15 we
read of how Baasha conspired to kill Nadab, the king of Israel,
after he had reigned only two years. Baasha became king then,
and reigned 24 years, but he was also a evil king, so nothing
was gained by the people in this politics of violence. His son
Elah became king, and 2 years later his servant Zimri
assassinated him, and became king. Once you killed the king,
you had to kill the whole family, and many of his friends, so
the violence of the ancient world was terrible.
There are other gruesome assassinations in the Old Testament. I
point this out so that we can see clearly the nature of
Mordecai's political decision, when he chose to become an
informer, and revealed the conspiracy against Xerxes
We see in Mordecai's experience good reason for why
political decisions are so paradoxical, and why it is that
politicians are often so variable. We see it in Mordecai's
patriotism. In the last paragraph of chapter 2 we see Mordecai
as a defender of the state,
and then in the first paragraph of chapter 3 we him as a defier
of the state. He first saved Xerxes life, and then he turns
around and refuses to obey his orders of bowing to Haman,
his highest representative. In the one place Mordecai is a
conservative, and in the next he is a liberal. In the one he is
a loyal citizen, and in the next he is a rebel.
We need to study both sides of the patriotism of Mordecai,
for the Bible and history make it clear that the Christian who
cannot be paradoxical in his politics and patriotism will not be
able to live a life of wisdom in relation to the state. The
paradox is, inconsistency
in relationship to man is the only way you can be consistent in
your relationship to God.
Let's focus first on the positive side.
I. MORDECAI AS DEFENDER OF THE STATE.
By defender, I mean Mordecai risked his life in order to a
loyal citizen, and to maintain the order of the state by
reporting the conspiracy to kill the king. Mordecai was a
foreigner, and he could have had the attitude that this is not
my country, so what do I care?
The believer is one who knows God is the God of order, and
unless the leaders of a state are so corrupt that a revolution
is demanded, those leaders should be honored. Many Christians
have, and do now, live under tyrants, and forms of government
that we could not tolerate as Americans. They live with far
less freedom than us, but they still love their country, and are
patriotic.
One of the reasons the Jews have been able to become
leaders in nations all over the world is because they have
practiced the principle of honoring and defending the state they
13. are in. Paul in Rom. 13 lays this down as a principle for
Christians in any state. "Let every person be subject to the
governing authorities. For there is no authority except from
God..." They are to receive our respect and honor. By
practicing this Christianity has been able to thrive under all
sorts of governments.
Mordecai was a great example of this principle, and thus a
great asset to the Persian Empire. By becoming an informer he
took a great risk for the sake of Xerxes, for informers tend to
get their names added to the hit list. Vincent Teresa was the
number 3 man in the New England Mafia. He had stolen 10 million
for himself in crime, and 150 million for his bosses and
confederates. When he turned informer, back in the early 70's,
dozens of big times mobsters ended up in prison. It took the
FBI's most brilliant minds
working constantly just to keep him alive. Assassination squads
were everywhere. Doctors, lawyers, and even policeman were paid
by Mafia to get him. It may have not have been this hot for
Mordecai, but had the assassins found out he was the informer,
he would have been their first target. He took risks to be a
defender of the state.
He was a hero of the state, and he was later greatly
rewarded for his loyalty. Patriotism
played a major role in God's providence in his life, and all of
Israel. Patriotism is a virtue,
but we must see that it also has its limitations. When the
state is exalted to the level of God, then defense of the state
is idolatry. Patriotism can have many motives, and this is
why it is only a relative, and not an absolute, virtue. Even
the Mafia are patriotic towards America, for its freedoms make
it the greatest place on earth for crime. Vincent Teresa
closes his book, My Life In The Mafia, with this paragraph.
“Let me tell you something: I'm the proudest guy in the
world to be an American. Before I went to jail I had
plenty of chances to take off and go live in a villa on
the Italian coast, but I wouldn't leave this country. I'd
rather spend 20 years in the can in America than 20
years free in Italy. The reason is, I love this country,
and that's the way it is with most mob guys. The mob
will not stand for anything against this country. They'll
rob from government arsenals and rob government
stock and sell it; but if they could discover that anyone's
trying to overthrow the country or anything like that,
they'll fight him. Most mob guys that I know of vote.
We vote whatever is the best way to make money. If
its going to be one of these guys who is going to be on
the reform kick all the time, we'll all band together and
vote against him.”
There is a higher percentage of the Mafia who vote, then of
born again Christians. So what I am saying is that patriotism is
good, but not an absolute good. If not modified by a higher
loyalty to God, it can become an evil. Thus, we turn to the
other side of Mordecai and see-
14. II. MORDECAI AS THE DEFIER OF THE STATE.
Verse 2 of chapter 3 makes it clear that bowing to Haman was
not a mere matter of courtesy, it was the law of the land, for
the king had commanded it. Not to bow was an act of defiance
against the state. Mordecai refused to bow. He had just risked
his life for Xerxes, but now when there is no risk at all
involved, he will not join the others and bow.
What has happened to his patriotism as a loyal citizen?
Mordecai seems to be inconsistent. After all, he let his
daughter marry the king, so he is related to him, and yet he
will not pay him the respect of bowing to his highest
representative.
The result of this stubborn refusal is that Haman becomes
hateful, and determines the entire Jewish race will pay for this
insubordination. Either Mordecai is a stubborn fool,
or he is standing for a principle more precious than life
itself. The only clue we have is in verse 4 where Mordecai's
only defense for his action is that he was a Jew. In other
words, we are dealing here with an issue of religious liberty,
or the multifaceted and complex issue of the separation of
church and state. What Mordecai is saying is that as a Jew
there is a limit as to how far he can go in conforming to the
state. He could risk his life for the state,
but he could not give up his religious liberty by bowing to
Haman, for he would be giving to the state the allegiance he
owed only to God. The issue here is really a matter of
idolatry.
Do we obey God or man?
The whole thing would be sheer folly if it was a matter of
personal pride. If Mordecai just didn't like Haman, his action
would be disgraceful. He risks the lives of his people out of
stubborn pride. If we see it as a battle for religious liberty,
however, then we can see
what has been a pattern of God's providence all through history.
Mordecai had his priorities straight. God is number one, and
the state can never be obeyed if it attempts to
usurp that place in our lives. The defenders of the state must
become defiers of the state when the state threatens to crush
religious liberty. The state has a right to our loyalty as long
as it recognizes its place in God's providence. When it begins
to encroach on God's domain, then our loyalty to God demands
that we defy the state. The state becomes Satanic when it
demands of us allegiance due only to God. We must chose then
either to
deify the state, or defy the state.
We know the issue of bowing to Haman was an attempt to
deify the state, for we have the record of Herodotus the ancient
historian. He tells us of others who came to Xerxes,
and who refused to acknowledge him as god. He tells of the
Lacedoemonians whom the guards forced to their knees before
Xerxes, yet, they refused to bow their heads, for they said they
had not come to Persia for the purpose of worshipping a man.
Xerxes excused them from bowing, for he had respect for their
religious liberty. Haman, you will note,
15. never told Xerxes that his hatred of the Jews and Mordecai
stemmed from Mordecai's refusal to bow to him. This was never
reported to Xerxes at all, for if it had been, he would have
nipped it in the bud right there, for he allowed for religious
liberty.
Haman is the culprit in the book of Esther, for his
personal hatred, based on his desire to be treated like deity,
is the cause for all the evil in the book. He plotted to get
all the Jews killed so Xerxes would never even know why. What
we are dealing with here is a corrupt politician in an otherwise
reasonably just government. Haman had let power go to his head,
and he will not tolerate being treated as secondary to God. He
will get revenge
on those who dare to put God first. The lesson of Esther is
that the believer can never do anything other than defy those
who presume to take God's place. The history of America
revolves around this basic principle.
A hundred years before the revolutionary war, king Charles
II of England demanded that the Mass. colony relinquished its
religious liberty, and let the Church of England control things,
with only church members having the right to vote. The Puritans
were enraged, and went into their pulpits preaching that they
must defy the kings orders. Better that they die free than
submit to such tyranny. The king heard of their rebellion, and
ordered 5,000 troops to sail to Mass. to crush the rebellion.
Increase Mather called for a day of prayer and fasting, and
later they learned that king Charles had died on that very day
of 1685. The result was the army never set sail. The Puritans
were convinced that defiance to a state which threatens
religious liberty is obedience to God. This principle
became the foundation for the American Revolution.
The result is we are a nation where the right to defy the
government is guaranteed.
If the state tries to interfere with our religious liberty, we
can take the state to the supreme court, and fight for our
rights. We have a Constitution which gives us a right to
protest
and demonstrate against our governments policies. Thank God for
freedom that most of the world has never known. What we have is
based on the basic truth that man has the right to put God
first, and to defy any authority that tries to take that first
place in our lives.
Most of us have never lived through a period where the
state is deified, and demanded absolute allegiance. Hopefully
we will never have to, but the Christians under Hitler had to.
I never realized until recently that Hitler established his own
church in Germany. It was called The German Church Of Positive
Christianity. Its design was to counter-act all Christian
opposition, and destroy Christianity. It was extremely
effective, and won most of the youth of Germany. Julius
Leuthenses wrote, "Adolf Hitler is own living witness of the
present era, who confirms the good work of the eternal Divine
Spirit in history, and who,
through his activity, enables us to understand in a new way the
16. teachings of Christ and His mission. Our watchword is not that
Hitler is equal to Christ, but: Through Hitler to Jesus
Christ."
That is just the beginning. Soon the preaching of the
cross was forbidden in church.
The picture of Hitler was hung in front of all churches, and he
was referred to in official statements as the way, the truth,
and the light. All Germans were urged to die for him,
and make their dying words heil Hitler. Hitler was so clever,
only the devil himself could have been guiding him, for he
completely revised Christianity, and made Nazism a perverted
Christianity. He declared mount Hesselberg his sacred mountain,
and Julius Streicher his high priest. Standing before the
bonfire he said, "When we look into the flames of this holy
fire, and throw our sins into them, we can descend from this
mountain
with clean souls. We do not need priests and ministers. We
have become our own priests."
Hitler actually became a god to millions of people who
could not see their folly until it was to late. I share this
because Hitler and Haman were two of a kind. There pride,
racial
hatred, and abuse of power make them brothers of the pit. Both
sought to wipe out the Jewish race. But there were Mordecai's
in Hitler's day as well. They defied the state,
and fought Hitler, and they made a difference. The tragic fact
is, these Mordecai's were two few in number. The majority of
Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, were deceived by
Hitler's clever use of patriotism. The people were whipped into
a religious frenzy of love and loyalty to the Fatherland.
Hitler could do not wrong, and Germany could do no wrong. The
Patriotic fervor so captivated Christians, that the voices of
the church in opposition were muted. Hitler was free to do the
works of Satan with little resistance.
Millions of Christians cooperated in the killing of 6 million
Jews.
It is the story of history repeating itself over and over
again, because of idolatry.
God's people bowed down to a false god, and as always, the
result is tragic judgment.
Had there been more Mordecai's defying the state when it began
to encroach on God's territory, the tragic and demonic history
of Germany could have been avoided. Many Christian leaders are
writing today of the danger of an American Civil Religion. It
uses Christian terminology, just as Hitler did, but it is not
Christian. It is a state religion that is designed to convince
Christian people that everything the state does is the will of
God. It is a powerful political tool.
Because of the ever present danger of the state becoming a
god, the Christian must be all the more conscious of the need to
exalt the Lordship of Jesus. Nothing is Christian,
no matter how good, or how American, which does not bow to Jesus
Christ, and confess Him as Lord. Mordecai, as a Jew, would bow
to none but Jehovah, and you and I, as Christians, can bow to
17. none but Jesus. Because it is so, we must be ready to both
defend and defy the state.
3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5
The Emperor Trajan said to Rabbi Joshua, "You teach that your
God is everywhere. I should like to see Him." The Rabbi
replied, "God's presence is everywhere, but He cannot be seen.
No mortal eye can behold His glory." The Emperor insisted,
however, and so the Rabbi said, "Let us begin then by first
looking at one of his servants. The Emperor consented to this,
and so followed the Rabbi out into the open. "Now," said the
Rabbi, "Gaze into the splendor of the sun." "I cannot," said
the Emperor, "The light dazzles me." The Rabbi responded, "Thou
art unable to endure the light of one of his servants, and canst
thou expect to behold the resplendent glory of the Creator.
Would not such a light annihilate thee."
The Jews had a higher concept of God than all ancient
peoples, because God revealed Himself to them as a God of
glory, light, and splendor. The Old Testament has many
descriptions of God like that given in Hab. 3:3-4. "His glory
covered the heavens, and His praise filled the earth. His
splendor was like the sun rise; rays flashed from His hand,
where His power was hidden." It was because of this knowledge
of the glory of God that the Jews were an optimistic people. A
man's character is determined largely by the character of the
God he worships. If one worships a god who is a tyrant, and
unpredictable, and without mercy, but cruel, it is not likely he
will be a man of flaming joy. Luther lived for years with a
false concept of God, and as a result, lived in fear and dread.
Most religions have had such a dark concept of God that the
followers of these religions seldom knew what it was to be truly
joyful and at peace.
Many ancient peoples, and peoples yet today, whose God's
are made in the image of man, and are only depraved supermen,
cruel and immoral, are no more optimistic than the materialist
who says, "I feel the universe is one huge, dead, immeasurable
steam engine, rolling on, in its dead indifference, to grind us
limb from limb." You can't expect persons like that to be
bursting with optimism, and bubbling with joy. On the other
hand, when people have the concept of God as He is revealed in
Scripture, it leads to optimism and joy. This was true in the
Old Testament, even before God fully revealed Himself in Jesus
Christ.
The Jews began their day at sundown, rather than at sunup.
All their festivals and holidays begin at night, and their
Sabbath also begins at night. All of this was to symbolize
their optimism and confidence in the God of light. Anyone can
have confidence in the day, and look forward to a bright day
when the sun rises, but the Jews began their rejoicing as the
sun sank to symbolize their confidence that even in the darkness
light will prevail, and a new day will dawn. Tomorrow always
comes for the believer. Even death cannot change that. Such
18. was the attitude of the Jews who had only a shadow of the full
revelation yet to come. How much greater ought our joy and
optimism to be who stand in the full light? Paul in II Cor. 4:6
writes, "For God, who said, "Let light shine out of darkness,"
made His light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the
knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ."
We have a message as superior to the Old Testament, as it
was to the pagan darkness surrounding it. That is why John,
after stating that his purpose for writing this book was that
the joy of believers might be full, immediately announces the
truth on which all Christian joy is based, which is, the truth
that God is light. This morning we want to examine this primary
message and its meaning. First let's look at the message
itself.
I. THE MESSAGE. John has built us up to a point of
expectation. He has made great statements of his aim to share
with us truths that will lead to fullness of fellowship, and
fullness of joy. We ought to be standing on our tiptoes
breathlessly longing to see what it is he is going to declare.
In verse 5, after this stimulating introduction, John says, this
is it! Here it is! This is the message that we have received,
and now pass it on to you. This is no matter of speculation and
theory, this is the message we have heard from Christ Himself,
and now declare to you, and that message is, God is light and in
Him is no darkness at all. We see a positive and negative side
to this message.
A. Positive-God is light. This is the strongest statement
in the whole Bible about Gods nature as light. Many text
describe the splendor of God, and the light of His presence, and
that He dwells in light unapproachable, and that He is the
author of all light, but here alone do we find the statement
that God is light. Nothing stronger can be said. This is as
far as human language can go in relating God and light. God is
light. Light is of the very essence of God's nature.
It is important, however, that we recognize that this is
not the whole truth about God's nature. It is but one aspect of
what He is. John will tell us He is also Law, Life, and Love,
and underneath all of these is the foundational fact that He is
personal. Light is impersonal, and if this was our main concept
of God, we would have only a God who was a great impersonal
source of all energy-a Divine Dynamo.
We must ever keep in mind that light and love, and all other
attributes of God are attributes of a Person. This means, it is
God who is light, and not light that is God.
This was the mistake of many people who began to worship the
creation rather than the Creator. They worshipped the sun,
moon, and stars, for they reversed the truth and said, light is
God. This is false. The light of the sun is not God, and the
light of all other bodies is not God. God as light is the
ultimate source of all light, but He is not that light. All
physical light is from God, and is a symbol of what He is in
Himself.
All physical reality is what it is because God is what He
19. is. Science can tell us what the sun does, and how it is the
source of all life on earth, but it is the Bible that tells us
why this is so. It is so because God is light. His creation
resembles His nature. The universe is a symbol of what God is.
It is not God, but is made by God, and is separate from Him, but
it is an expression of what He is. This is why all life depends
on light, for all life depends on God, and God is light. This
is why the earth revolves around the sun which is the source of
all life, because only as men put God into the center of their
lives, and revolve around Him, will they have light and life.
All of this is simply saying God has made the universe, and
physical light, as a pattern of what is true in the spiritual
realm. God is in the spiritual realm what the sun is in the
physical realm. He is the source of all light and life. As
light is the absolute in science, so God is the absolute in the
spiritual realm.
Thou art, O God, the life and light
Of all this wondrous world we see;
Its glow by day, its smile by night,
Are but reflections caught from Thee;
Where'er we turn, Thy glories shine,
And all things fair and bright are Thine.
The very first thing that God called good was light. In
Gen. 1:4 God saw that the light was good. It was His first
stroke of the brush on the canvas of reality, and it was a
masterpiece already. God did not make anything in the dark. He
began His project of creation just as we usually begin ours, by
turning on the light. Light is the link between the Creator and
creation. Light is part of the nature of God, and it is the
foundation of all that God has made. When you study light, you
are into both science and theology. Many of the great
scientists have known this. They have seen that life is
dependent on light, and that the Creator of life had to be a God
of light.
Dr. Michael Pupin, the great inventor, philosopher, and
teacher, got his start in scientific research by watching the
stars as a shepherd boy in the Hungarian hills.
All his life, as he studied light, he was devoted to the God of
light. He wrote,
"I found in the light of stars a heavenly language which
proclaims the glory of God. Each burning star is a focus of
energy, of life-giving activity which it pours out lavishly into
every direction; it pours out the life of its own heart, in
order to beget new life. What a vista that opens to our
imagination! What new beauties are disclosed in the words of
Genesis: 'God...breathed into his nostrils the breath of life;
and man became a living soul.' The light of the stars is a part
of the life-giving breath of God. I never look now upon the
starlit vault of heaven without feeling this divine breath and
its quickening action upon my soul.
Kepler, after discovering the laws that govern the speeds
of the planets, prayed, "Dear Lord, who hast guided us to the
light of Thy glory by the light of nature, thanks be Thee.
20. Behold, I have complete the work to which Thou hast called me,
and I rejoice in the creation whose wonder thou hast given me to
reveal unto men. Amen."
The power of life is in light, and without light life
cannot continue. We could get into biology here, but man's new
discovery of the power of light is more fascinating.
Albert Einstein back in 1905 wrote a paper on light that won him
the Nobel Prize. In it he proved that light is both a wave and
a particle, and so light is a paradox, and has the freedom to be
different things in different experiments. He predicted then
that man would be able to some day use light in a very intense
and focused ray. In 1960 Dr. Theodore Maiman made and used the
first laser, and since this, many new lasers have been developed
for doing what man could never do before. Now, by the power of
light, the life of man is being radically changed. In our life-time
light has changed almost every facet of our lives.
The books I checked out to study light were checked out by
means of a laser light.
The groceries we purchase our read by a laser light. Laser
light can cut steel and even diamonds. Lasers are used for eye
surgery, so that those who once would be blind are now made to
see. Miracles that Jesus did as the light of the world are now
being done by light, which also has Him as its author and
creator. The military uses lasers in missals and other
weapons. The whole security systems of the world depend on
lasers. Laser optical discs can hold the entire Encyclopedia
Brittanica on one side. There seems to be no end to the power
and blessings that man is finding in the power of light. If
God lets history go on into the 21st century, man will create a
whole new world by the power of light. And if God ends history
soon, the result will be the same, for in eternity we will dwell
with God in that city filled with the light of His presence.
However the story of history goes, we can be optimists as
Christians, for we are heading for the light. Georgia Harkness
wrote,
Our light grows dim, the air is thick with gloom,
And everywhere mens souls are crushed with fears.
Yet high above the carnage and the gloom
The call resounds across the teeming years,
Lift high Christ's cross! Serve God and trust His might!
I do believe the world is swinging toward the light.
Light is not only the coming thing, because Jesus, the
light, is coming, but He is already here, and says in John 8:12,
"I am the light of the world: He who follows me will not walk
in darkness, but will have the light of life." Gilchrist Lawson
wrote,
The one who made the earthly sun
So full of power of warmth and
might,
Can cause the Sun of Righteousness
To bathe the soul in floods of
light.
The greatest changes in life are always based on what man
21. does with his physical or spiritual light. Jesus was the light
that lightens every man said John. He was and is the light of
the world. He was and is the source of life that is eternal,
for all life needs light, and He is the only light that can
never be put out, and so He is the only source of eternal life.
Light that we see is self revealing. One does not need to
light a match to see if his flashlight is on. But all men are
blind to most of the light God has made a part of reality. We
see only the six colors of the rainbow which is white light
devided up into its six different wave lengths. But this is a
mere fraction of light. There are cosmic rays, gamma rays, x-rays,
ultraviolet rays, infrared rays, television, radar, short
wave, standard and long radio waves, and long electric waves.
These ten different categories of light we cannot see. But man
has learned how to use these invisible sources of light to do
wonders in life. So the challenge of the Christian life is to
recognize there is great power available in the realm of the
invisible. Paul says in II Cor. 4:18, "So we fix our eyes not
on what is seen, but what is unseen. For what is seen is
temporary, but what is unseen is eternal." There is power for
life abundant in the light of Christ's unseen presence, and in
the light of the illuminating power of the Holy Spirit. We need
to pray,
Light of the world, illumine this darkened earth of Thine,
Till everything that's human be filled with the Divine.
There is no physical factor in all reality that can better
be used as a symbol of the nature of God, than light, for as
Alford, the Greek scholar said, "It unites in itself purity,and
cleanness, and beauty, and glory, as no other material object
does." Light is the most spiritual of all the things we know in
the realm of the physical. The more we know about light and its
blessings, the more we will understand the glory and splendor of
God, who is light, and the source of all lights.
Then John adds to his positive message a statement which
is-
B. Negative-in Him is no darkness at all. The Greek here
is very emphatic. There is a double negative here, which is
permitted in Greek, and would sound like this in English, "There
is not none at all." This is the concept that is the basis for
a common bond among believers, and is the basis for much joy.
The positive without his strong negative would not distinguish
Christianity from the Gnostics and many other false religions.
The Gnostics, like the ancient Persians, had a dualism in their
concept of deity, in which, there was both light and darkness in
God. Many others have also had concepts of God which while
recognizing Him to be glorious, also attributed to Him much
evil. The Christian revelation rises to the heights of a God
who is absolutely pure, and is not the origin of any evil.
This becomes the basis for our fullness of joy, for the God
and Father of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is light without
darkness. Even the sun has spots, but not our God, for He is
perfect light, and the source of all good, but no evil. Any
idea of God that implies He is the source of evil is
inconsistent with the New Testament revelation. E.S. Jones
22. tells the story of the little girl who was playing with a friend
when a cloud came up and covered the Sun. She looked up and
said, "That mean old God again, always spoiling our fun." The
mother heard it and that night she told the father. He was
shocked and did not understand where in the world she would get
such a concept of God. They punished her by making her say her
prayers ten times. Imagine, prayers being made as a punishment,
and yet they wondered where she got her concept of a cruel God.
Parents may in many ways convey to their children concepts of
God that include spots and shadows of darkness. This message
of John must be our guide. God is light and in Him is no
darkness at all.
We need the light of God to guide us so that we do not blot
His image with the darkness of our own ignorance and faulty
faith. Let our prayer be that of Constance Milman.
Lord send thy light,
Not only in the darkest night,
But in the shadows, dim twilight,
Wherein my strained and aching sight
Can scarce distinguish wrong from right,
Then send thy light.
The light of God is known by the fact that in it is no
darkness at all. Satan himself can appear as an angel of light,
and the world uses light to glorify all its evil, but we need
not be seduced by these false lights if we keep this absolute
negative in mind-no darkness at all. Wordsworth put it, "But
ne'er to a seductive lay, let faith be given. Nor deem that
light which leads astray, is light from heaven." This then, is
the message that is essential to making our fellowship unique
and joy complete. Now, let us consider some further meanings
contained in this message.
II. THE MEANINGS. A message like this is filled with more
meaning than we can begin to comprehend. To say that God is
light sheds more light on His nature than we have eyes to see,
but what we can see is important to look at. The first thing we
want to look at is-
A. The Ethical Meaning.
This is really the primary meaning that John is
conveying in this context. God is absolutely pure. God is
righteousness, and in Him is no sin at all. That is why John
goes on to say, "If we say we have fellowship with God and walk
in darkness we are liars," for God cannot fellowship with men
who walk in darkness. He is light, and light has nothing in
common with darkness, and, therefore, fellowship is impossible.
A man living in sin can no more walk with God than fire and
gasoline can have fellowship together. God is absolutely
ethically pure, and that is why Christians must constantly
confess their sins and be cleansed by the blood of Christ, for
it is the only way we can truly have fellowship with God.
In this context John makes clear there are two ways of
thinking that are false, and lead to false living. One is to
imply that there is any sin in God, and two is to deny that
there is sin in man. The Christian must be clear on both
points. God is light, and is pure, with no darkness at all, but
23. no man, except he who was God incarnate, and the light of the
world, is totally pure, and without some degree of darkness due
to sin. Christian ethical thinking must be based on these two
truths. The Gnostics denied them, and the result was all kinds
of unethical and immoral conduct.
Let this principle be a guide. God is far more than we can
think, but He is never less than what we can think. This means,
if you can think of a higher concept of God than the one you now
have, the one you now have is a false concept. God can never be
less than the highest you can conceive. Whenever men talk about
God, you can know if they speak of the true God, or one of their
own making, by simply asking, is the God they speak of the
highest and purest that man can conceive. If the God they speak
of cannot measure up to this standard, he is not the God who is
light, and in whom is no darkness at all.
B. The Intellectual Meaning.
When we say a person has seen the light, we mean the
truth has been grasped by the mind. Light and truth are often
synonymous. This could be paraphrased, God is truth and in Him
is no error at all. It means, not only that God is absolutely
pure, but He is also absolutely wise. This is again a basis for
great joy for the believer. He has a resource like no other.
Jesus said the Holy Spirit would lead His disciples into all
truth. He can do this, for as light, He knows all truth.
All our knowledge, sense, and sight
Lie in deepest darkness shrouded.
Til Thy Spirit brakes our night,
With the beams of truth unclouded.
There is much more meaning in this message-the theological,
biological, emotional, but we can't cover them all. What we
have looked at, however, ought to make it clear how great a
message this is, and how a deeper understanding of it will lead
to a greater fellowship and joy in the believers life. Praise
God for who He is for God is light.
4. MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET1:2
A snowstorm made it impossible for a guess speaker to get to the
church where he was to preach. Therefore, a local man was asked
to come in as a substitute. The speaker began by explaining the
meaning of substitute. If you break a window he said, and then
place a cardboard there instead--that is a substitute. After
his sermon, a woman came up to him, shook his hand and wishing
to compliment him said, "You are no substitute. You are a real
pane." Unfortunately, verbal communication does not reveal how
a word is spelled, and so, if he heard "pain" rather than "pane"
as she intended, he would have received a message just the
opposite of what she meant to convey. We must constantly be
aware of the complications of language if we hope to effectively
communicate.
24. Words can be alike and yet be very different depending on
the context. If I say you have good vision, or you have good
sight, these words are very close in meaning.
But if I say my daughter is a vision, and yours is a sight, I am
in trouble, for some how they do not remain synonymous in this
context.
When we come to the word grace, or charis in the Greek, we
are dealing with one word that can mean opposite things
depending upon the context. We miss the complexity of this word
because in our English translations there are 11 different
English words used to translate this one Greek word. We are not
even aware most often that charis is being used. The root idea
of the word is that which is pleasing, or which gives pleasure.
From there it develops numerous connections with various kinds
of pleasure and favor. It's meaning becomes so diverse that it
is hard to see how the same word can be used for so many things,
and often with no apparent connection.
Our English word grace has followed the same pattern in a
small way. You have a 30 day grace period on your insurance
policy. This fits the idea of unmerited favor. They carry you
for 30 days even though you don't deserve it, because you have
not paid your premium. But what has this got to do with saying
grace before you eat? You do not say unmerited favor, but you
say thanks, which is your expression of favor to God. But if
you say the swan has grace, you do not mean it has unmerited
favor, or that it has thanks. You mean it has natural elegance,
beauty of line and movement. It makes a favorable impression on
us by its grace. We haven't begun to list all the meanings this
word can have, but it is clear from these few examples, that the
word has to be constantly redefined according to the context.
A man living on the boarder of Minnesota and Wisconsin was
puzzled for years as to which state he actually lived in.
Finally he got around to having a special survey made. When the
surveyor reported to him that he lived in Wisconsin, he tossed
his hat in the air and shouted, "Hooray! No more of those cold
Minnesota winters!" Of course, redefining where you are located
does not change the weather, but to redefine a word can change
the whole atmosphere of a passage.
Grace is a warm and positive word usually, but it can be
used in a cold and negative way. Charis means favor, and favor
can be shown to those who do not deserve it, and thus, you have
unmerited favor. Sound great doesn't it? But what if you were
a student who worked hard for a scholarship and fulfilled all
the requirements, but the gift went to student x, who didn't do
a thing, but whose sister was the wife of the teacher, and so
got it because of connections? Here is a form of unmerited
favor which we call favoritism. It is unjust because it favors
someone at the expense of another more deserving. Greek
citizens had to swear an oath not to show this kind of charis
for or against a fellow citizen.
Charis, in this sense, is equivalent to the Hebrew idea of
respect of persons. The Bible makes it clear that God is no
respecter of persons. He shows no favoritism. That is why the
25. universalism of God's grace is stressed in the New Testament.
Christ died for all men. This avoids any danger of reading the
negative idea of favoritism into God's grace.
The word is used this way in the New Testament, however.
Paul, the apostle of positive grace, was a victim of negative
grace. In Acts 24:27 we read, "Felix desiring to do the Jews a
favor left Paul in prison." Here was favor, or grace, expressed
for a selfish reason, and at the expense of another--namely
Paul. In Acts 25:9 we see the same thing. Fetus wishing to do
the Jews a favor took their side against Paul. This is the kind
of grace that corrupts. The poet put it--
When rogues like these (a sparrow cries)
To honors and employment rise,
I court no favor, ask no place
For such preferment is disgrace.
The paradox is that there is a grace which is a disgrace, for it
is the receiving of unmerited favor which is unjust, because it
is at the expense of others.
Now, as if this is not enough complexity, being able to
mean either good or bad unmerited favor, we want to see that it
can also mean merited favor. Most often Christians define grace
as only unmerited favor, but this is putting a limit on the
word which the New Testament does not do. It should not be
surprising that grace can also mean merited favor. It is
logical that favor is going to be shown toward those who merit
it. No man merits salvation, which is the greatest aspect of
God's grace, but many are pleasing to God by their obedience,
and God responds to them in grace.
To see this in operation, we need to go to the very first
reference to grace in the New Testament. In Luke 1:30 the angel
says, "Fear not, Mary, for you have found favor with God."
Favor here is charis again. Mary was not sinless, but she was
pure and lovely in character, and her life pleased God. She was
chosen to be the mother of the Messiah because of her pure life.
It is obvious she did not merit this honor in the sense that she
was worthy, for no person could ever be worthy to give birth to
the Son of God. On the other hand, she was not holy unfit to be
Christ's mother, for she had a life pleasing to God, and the
kind of life needed for His purpose. God did not favor her
because she was less pure and righteous than others, but because
of her exceptional purity and righteousness. She attracted
God's favor by the beauty of her life.
The clearest example of merited favor is in connection with
Christ Himself. Luke 2:52 says, "Jesus increased in wisdom and
stature, and in favor with God and man."
Favor is charis again. You can see how meaningless it would be
to define grace here as unmerited favor. This would mean that
Jesus was not worthy of the favor of God, but God granted it
anyway. And men, out of the goodness of their hearts, showed
favor to Christ, even though he did not deserve it. This, of
course, would be sheer nonsense. Grace here means merited
favor. Jesus by the inherent beauty, goodness,
and harmony of his life, attracted the favor of God and man.
Jesus had a quality of character that fully merited all the
26. favor He received.
This is an aspect of grace that we are seldom aware of. We
tend to think of grace as a one way street: God's grace toward
us. But favor works both ways in the New Testament. If God
favors us and gives us blessings, we in turn favor God, and
respond with gratitude to His graciousness. Our response is
described by this same word--charis. We respond with grace.
Listen to Paul in--
I Cor. 15:57, "But thanks be to God who gives us the victory..."
II Cor. 2:14, "But thanks be to God, who in Christ always leads
us in triumph."
II Cor. 8:16, "But thank to God who puts the same earnest care
for you into the
heart of Titus."
II Cor. 9:15, "Thanks be to God for His inexpressible gift."
In each case, do you know what the Greek word is for
thanks? It is charis, the same word used all through the New
Testament for grace and favor. Grace be to God Paul says over
and over again as he expresses his love and gratitude for God's
grace. Here is grace which is merited. God merits our favor in
every way, and therefore, all of man's grace to God is merited
grace. This, of course, is where grace gets its connection with
prayer before meals. We express our favor and thanks to God for
His favor and goodness to us. Therefore, to multiply in grace
means to grow in thankfulness, among other things.
There are numerous passages where grace is the root idea in
thanksgiving. The Greek word for thanksgiving is eucharist, and
you see charis as the heart of it. The Lord's Supper is called
the feast of the eucharist, or the feast of thanksgiving. It is
our expression of grace for the great grace of God in giving us
His Son. Grace at the very heart of the Gospel, as it is
expressed in this poetic version of John 3:16.
For God--the Lord of earth and heaven, so loved and longed
to see forgiven,
The world--in sin and pleasure mad, that He gave the
greatest gift He had--
His only begotten Son--to take our place: That whosoever--
Oh what grace;
Believeth--placing simple trust in Him--the righteous and
the just,
Should not parish lost in sin, But have eternal life--in
Him.
When we feel great joy because we have experienced God's
grace or favor, we are experiencing a form of grace in our joy,
for the Greek word for joy is chara. When we feel joyful, we are
feeling graceful, which means full of favor.
The word chara is used in the following Bible passages: Matt.
2:10, "When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding
great joy (chara)."
Matt. 5:12, "Rejoice and be exceeding glad (chara): for great
is your reward in heaven..."
6Matt. 13:44 , "Again, the kingdom of heaven is like treasure
hid in afield; when a man has found it, he hides, and for joy
27. (chara) thereof goes and sells all that he has, and buys that
field."Matt. 18:13 describes the Lord's joy (chara) at finding
the lost sheep.
Matt. 25:21, 23, "His lord said unto him, Well done, good and
faithful servant: you have been faithful over a few things, I
will make the ruler over many things: enter into the joy (chara)
of thy lord."We begin to see the relationship between joy and
that which causes joy, namely, the favor and bounty which we
receive from the Lord.
In the realm of redemption, all of God's grace is favor
toward those who not only do not merit it, but who deserve His
wrath. In the gift of Christ, and salvation in Him, there is
nothing but God's love to account for it. There is much of the
grace of God, however, that flows out to men on the basis of
their obedience. In other words, we can win the favor of God,
and grow in grace by acts and attitudes which please Him. Peter
uses charis to refer to a clear case of merited grace in I Peter
2:19-20. You would never know it, however, for charis is hidden
behind the English word of commendable. He writes, "For it is
commendable (charis), if a man bears up under the pain of unjust
suffering because he is conscious of God. But how is it to your
credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it?
But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is
commendable (charis), before God."
Peter is saying, it is worthy of thanks, merit, and God's
favor, if you, like Christ, suffer for righteousness sake.
Grace does not lessen, but increases as we become more
Christlike. God's grace flows forth, not only to sinners in
abundance, but to the saints as well. Milton in Paradise Lost
refers to God's grace as bountiful generosity to those who serve
Him.
Yet so much bounty is in God, such grace,
That who advances His glory, not their own,
Them He Himself to glory will advance.
From this idea we go on to see that grace refers to the
many gifts of God to His children. Grace is not only the
generosity of the giver, and the gratitude of the receiver, it
is the gift also. The Greek for gift is charisma. A gift is
something with which you express favor, and so charis is the
basic idea in the word gift. It could be translated gracious
gift. In the well known Rom. 6:23, "The wages of sin is death,
but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our
Lord:" Gift is charisma, or gracious gift. Here we are in
realm of redemption, and, as always, God's grace is totally
unmerited. It is in contrast to the wages of sin. Wages imply
merit or earned remuneration. Men merit, or deserve, death and
damnation. They earn this by their life of sin. The gift of
God, however, is not earned, but is a gift of unmerited favor.
God's grace runs all through the New Testament under the word
gift.
God's giving does not end with salvation, however. His
grace is sufficient for all of life, and He goes on giving
gifts, as aspects of His grace. In II Cor. 1:11 Paul says,
28. "You also must help us by prayer, so that many will give thanks
(eucharis) on our behalf for the blessing (charisma) granted us
in answer to many prayers." All blessings are gifts of grace.
Some are merited, and some are not.
We know the Bible says much about gifts, but we have not
been conscious of the fact that these are parts of grace. Men
with special gifts of God are called charismatic. They are full
of grace. As we multiply in grace, we grow in our capacity to
be used of God, for we acquire, develop, and perfect more gifts
as channels of His grace. In I Peter 4:10 Peter says, "As each
has received a gift (charisma) employ it for one another as good
stewards of God's varied grace." The whole of Christian service
is an extension of God's grace. He gives it to us, and we pass
it on. When we show favor we are being channels of God's grace.
God's grace can be experienced through us. The giver, the
receiver, the gift of power, love, joy, kindness, and
innumerable other values are included in this marvelous word
grace.
Now we can understand why Paul begins everyone of his
letters with grace, ends everyone of them with grace and fills
them with references to it, and builds his theology around it.
Paul was the great Apostle of grace, and of the 155 references
to it in the N.T., 130 of them are from his pen. Now we can
understand why Peter also makes a big issue of it, and why he
wants to see grace multiplied in the lives of believers, and why
he in 3:18 ends his letter by urging them to grow in grace and
knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Grace is the
source of all that is included in salvation and sanctification.
Everything we are, and do, and will ever be, and do, depends on
our growth in grace. Therefore, let our prayer be that which
was left by the Duchess of Gordon among her papers when she
died. "O Lord, give me grace to feel the need of Thy grace;
give me grace to ask for Thy grace; and when in Thy grace Thou
hast given me grace, give me grace to use Thy grace."
This is a prayer very consistent with the theology of the
N.T. for we read in Heb. 4:16 something quite similar. "Let us
then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we
may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of
need." The point is, we need grace, not only as sinner who need
to be saved, we need grace to be saints who are becoming what
God wants us to be. It is cheap grace when we just trust in
Christ to save us, and then do not call upon His grace to
sanctify us and help us do his will.
I like the KJV and the RSV of our text of II Pet. better,
for they translate it,
"Grace and peace be multiplied unto you.." Peter goes on to tell
the Christians to add one virtue after another to their lives,
but here he begins by saying don't just add grace, but let it be
multiplied. The NIV means the same thing with its, "Grace and
peace be yours in abundance..", but the word multiplied adds to
the emphasis, and its absence subtracts from the sum that the
word grace deserves.
A six year old boy ran home from school, and immediately
29. went to the back of his house and grabbed his pet rabbit out of
his cage. He shouted at it, 2 plus 2, and he kept it up until
his mother came out and asked him what he was doing. He said, as
he put the rabbit back in its cage with an attitude of contempt,
"Our teacher told us today that rabbits multiply rapidly, but
this dumb bunny can't even add." Their was obviously some
misunderstanding here about multiplying. But there is no such
misunderstanding about multiplying in grace in the N. T.
No word in the N.T. carries more of the content of the
Gospel than the word grace. Griffith Thomas said of it,
"...perhaps the greatest word in the Bible because it is the
word most truly expressive of God's character and attitude in
relation to man." The Interpreter's Bible without reservation
says, "Grace is the greatest word in the New Testament, and in
the human vocabulary." Another author says, " Mastery of the
Bible's teaching about Grace is the most important goal of the
Christian Way of Life."To grow in grace, and to multiply grace,
and have it in abundance is what the Christian life is all about
according to the New Testament. To give God pleasure by our
lives we need to be growing in grace, and this means giving
favor, and not just receiving it.
The value of studying all aspects of grace is that we do
not limit it to just one of its many beautiful meanings, and
thereby lose much of what God wants us to receive as well as
give. Unmerited favor is true and vital, but it is only one part
of grace. We are to seek God's grace by meriting it as well. The
whole idea of reward is based on grace. We please God by
obedience and we win His grace and thus, are rewarded. His grace
also covers His favor in doing all sorts of things for us that
we cannot do ourselves. In fact I discovered on the internet
that one author who studies grace in depth came to the
conclusion that the best definition of grace is, "God doing for
us what we cannot do for ourselves!"
Let me share a quote from this author who calls himself
brother Dan. He posted this on the internet for millions of
people to read.
I just read the thesaurus on my word processor regarding
the word"grace". Let me try to explain what I just learned.
First, there were several meanings given for grace: Elegance,
Kindness, Mercy, Holiness, Invocation, and Beautify.
Elegance is not a definition of grace we usually consider
when we are discussing God's grace theology. But, let us
consider the synonyms for elegance just for what illumination
God may give us: polish, refinement, attractiveness, beauty,
charm, and comeliness.
In line with this is the definition 'beautify', and its
synonyms: adorn, decorate, embellish, enhance, ornament, crown,
and deck. At first glance, these two definitions with their
synonyms may not seem to be all that theologically significant
in studying "grace".But, I believe that God would have us know
that the true image of elegance and beauty are only found in His
nature. He wants to polish and adorn us. We are His creation. He
knows what we need most.
God wants to refine, embellish, enhance and crown us with His
30. Eternal, Holy and Sovereign character. When we discovered that
Jesus was calling us, we were so ugly. In light of God's nature,
we, like Adam, must run and hide and cover our ugly nakedness.
But, God picks us up and begins to bring out our true beauty, to
manifest His charm and comeliness in our broken spirits. We
indeed are ornamented with the fruit of His Holy Spirit, if we
allow Him to do His work in us.
John J. Clark wrote, "Cheap grace is grace without
discipleship, the cross, Jesus Christ living and
incarnate.Costly Grace, on the other hand, is the treasure
hidden in a field. For the sake of it a man will gladly go and
sell all that he
has. It is a pearl of great price to buy which will cost us
everything. It's the kingly rule of Christ, for whose sake a
man will pluck out the eye which causes him to stumble. It is
the call of Jesus at which a disciple leaves his nets and
follows. It is grace which must be sought again and again, the
gift which must be asked for, the door at which a man must
knock.
Such grace is costly because it calls us to follow, and it is
grace because it calls us to follow Jesus Christ. Costly
because it costs a man his life, it is grace because it gives a
man the only true life. Costly because it condemns sin, and
grace because it justifies
the sinner. Above all, costly because it cost God the life of
His
Son: "You have been bought with a price" and what has cost God
so
much can't be cheap for us. It is grace because God did not
reckon
his Son too dear a price to pay for our life, but delivered him
up
for us. It is costly because it compels a man to submit to the
yoke
of Christ, but it is grace because "My yoke is easy and my
burden light".
He is illustrating the paradox of grace. It is so free,
from one perspective, but so costly from another. It is a most
multi-faseted virtue, with multiple meanings, which we are to be
busy multiplying in our lives. So let us make the prayer of the
Duchess of Gordon, that I read earlier, be our prayer. "O Lord,
give me grace to feel the need of Thy grace; give me grace to
ask for Thy grace; and when in Thy grace Thou hast given me
grace, give me grace to use Thy grace."
CHAPTER5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based on
Heb.10:32-34
Few men alive on this planet have suffered more than did James B.
Stockdale. He was a prisoner of war for 2,714 days in Vietnam.
On one occasion the North Vietnamese handcuffed his hands behind
his back, locked his legs in heavy irons, and dragged him from
31. his cell to the unshaded courtyard. They left him lay there for
3 days. The sun burned him, and the guards beat him so he could
not sleep. Men died with such torture, but Stockdale survived,
and the reason he did was because of the music of sympathy. That
is, he got messages from the prisoners that encouraged him to
fight on. He would hear a towel snapping in their special
prisoner code, and it would say God bless you Jim Stockdale. The
sounds of a snapping towel in the midst of torture does not seem
like much to us, but for him it was a symphony of sympathy that
helped keep him alive.
The prisoners of war were isolated, for this is, in itself,
a form of torture. Loneliness can be harder to bear than
physical pain. The captives, however, developed an elaborate
system of communication by which they could send messages from
cell to cell, and even from building to building. They used
their fingers, fists, elbows, and tin cups, and then they
developed a sophisticated tapping routine. Dr. Julius Segal in
his book, Winning Life's Toughest Battles, studied these men who
survived, and records their amazing efforts to develop their
togetherness in a world of isolation.
The prisoner assigned to sweep the prison compound used the
broom movements to talk to the rest of the prisoners. When
walking past another cell the way they would drag their sandals
would send a message. Some sent messages by the way they blew
their noses, and others by belching. One feigned sleep for a
couple of hours each day, and during the siesta period he would,
by his snoring, send reports to everyone in his cell block.
Nave Lieutenant Commander John S. McCain III, who spent much
of his five and a half years in solitary confinement, concluded,
"The most important thing for survival as a POW was communication
with someone, even if it was only a wave or a wink, or a tap on a
wall, or to have a guy put his thumb up. It made all the
difference." POW Everett Alvarez said, "They were acts of
self-healing. We really got to know each other through our
silent conversations across the brick walls. Eventually, we
learned all about each other's childhood, back ground,
experiences, wives and children, hopes and ambitions." Our
hostages in Iran had the same kind of experience. Some of them
never met until after they were liberated, yet they felt they
knew each other because of the support system they developed.
Katherine Koob said, "Just knowing that someone in the next cell
cared that I existed helped me go on."
All of this confirms the New Testament message on the
importance of sympathy.
It is a key weapon in surviving and overcoming the unjust
suffering of this world. The early Christians had to suffer so
much persecution, but that which sustained them and kept the
church alive was the symphony of sympathy. The Greek word in
Heb. 10:34 is sumpatheo, which means sympathy, or, to suffer with
another. Another form of the word is sumpathes, and this is the
word used by Peter in I Pet. 3:8 where he writes, "Finally, all
of you, live in harmony with one another, be sympathetic, love as
brothers, be compassionate and humble." These two Greek words
represent, not just a solo instrument, or even a duet, but a
32. whole orchestra of instruments that produce a symphony of
sympathy, that brings harmony into a world of discord.
Just a partial list of the words that convey some aspects of
sympathy will reveal how widespread this virtue is. Synonyms of
sympathy are, compassion, condolence, unity, harmony, alliance,
concord, tenderness, pity, friendliness, kindness,
fellow-feeling, consolation, brotherly-love, and
warm-heartedness. In other words, the study of sympathy connects
us with practically every relationship virtue of the Christian
life.
The paradox is, this is a form of suffering that is
self-imposed. It is a voluntary choice to enter into the
sufferings of another, and feel some of the same pain they do.
Here is suffering that could easily be avoided by simply not
caring. The opposite of sympathy is antipathy. This is the
feeling that you have when you are not drawn to the sufferer to
stand along side and feel with him. But, rather, when you are
repulsed by the sufferer, and withdraw in hostility to let them
stand alone. In between these two extremes of sympathy and
antipathy is the neutral apathy, where you are neither pulled
toward nor pushed from the sufferer, but are indifferent, with no
feelings one way or the other.
Elinor Wylie, the poet and novelist, was deeply distressed,
and she woke Katherine Porter at four A.M., and when she came to
the door Miss Wylie said to her, "I have stood the crossness of
this world as long as I can, and I am going to kill myself. You
are the only person in the world to whom I wish to say good-bye."
Miss Porter looked her dispassionately in the eye and responded,
"Elinor, it was good of you to think of me. Good-bye." Here was
a woman seeking sympathy, but she got apathy, with a tinge of
antipathy. The fact is, just as sympathy is the key to survival
in life's sufferings, so apathy and antipathy are the weapons
Satan uses to bring people to defeat and despair.
People need a song of some sort in their life to keep on
going, and the symphony of sympathy provides the music for
living. It is no second rate virtue. It is agape love in
action. We want to focus our attention on this paradoxical form
of suffering that is a key factor in the alleviation of
suffering. The first thing we want to look at is-
I. THE PAIN OF SYMPATHY.
It costs to care, and there are pains to pay and hurts
involved in helping others bear their burdens. Our text
describes Christians who stand along side other Christians who
were being insulted and persecuted. They sympathized with
Christians who were imprisoned, and when you stand along side of
people who are being rejected, you too will be rejected, and they
were, and they suffered the loss of their property because they
identified with those who suffered.
Someone defined sympathy as, "Your pain in my heart."
William Stidger tells of seeing a group of boys and girls in his
home town gathered around a friend on the ground. He walked over
33. and saw this young boy doubled over and weeping with pain. He
asked one of the children what the problem was, and the girl
replied, "We've all got a pain in Jimmy's stomach." This was
sympathy, and she was feeling the pain right along with the
suffering friend. Benjamin Franklin had sympathy for the Indians
in a day when it was costly to care for Indians. On Dec. 14,
1763, 57 white vigilantes raided a peaceable settlement of one of
the Indian tribes and killed 6 of the 20 Indians there.
Two weeks later over 200 vigilantes raided the jail where
the other 14 were being kept in protective custody, and they
broke the door down and killed the Indians. Franklin was
outraged, and called for the punishment of these white savages.
He raised a militia of almost 1000 men, and rode out to prevent
their next strike. He succeeded in saving 140 Indian lives. But
his sympathy for the Indians cost him dearly, and he was defeated
that year for reelection to the Colonial Assembly of
Pennsylvania.
Sympathy is a choice as to what you will suffer for, and
everybody suffers for something. Will you suffer for the
prejudice and bigotry of antipathy by adding to the suffering of
others? Will you suffer the judgment of apathy by having no
feelings toward the suffering of others? Or will you suffer the
pain of sympathy, because you choose to identify with, and stand
along side of, others as they suffer? The first two are
Satan-like and fallen humanity-like. Only the third choice is
Christ-like. Jesus was tempted in all points like as we are, but
without sin. He entered into flesh and lived on our level, and
He knows by experience what the battle of life is all about.
Heb. 4:15 says, "For we do not have a high priest who is unable
to sympathize with our weaknesses..." He can stand along side
and suffer with us, because He has been there, and He knows what
it is to be weak and to suffer. It was painful for Him, but
profitable for us that Jesus entered the limitations of the
flesh, for we now have a Sympathizing Savior.
This is where we see the value of much suffering in this
fallen world. All suffering becomes good suffering that leads
you to sympathize with others in their suffering. Allen Gregg of
the Rockefeller Fund said, he hated to see a medical student get
his MD degree before he had been a patient in the hospital. "I'd
like to put every intern through an appendectomy at least. Not
for the surgical experience, but to learn how the average patient
is treated." So also, every lawyer who has not been through a
court case has little notion of what his clients suffer. It is
not enough to walk a mile in someone else's moccasin says Sidney
Harris. He says, "They have to pinch enough, long enough for the
blister to be remembered when the shoe is on the other foot." In
other words, all caregivers need to experience suffering to some
degree to be able to enter into the pain of sympathy. This is
vital to the helping of others bear their burdens.
We do not know why the Good Samaritan was so sympathetic
toward a stranger who was beaten and robbed. Possibly he had
been there himself, and had been attacked on a previous journey.
Whatever the case, he was the hero of the story because he was
willing to voluntarily suffer the pains of sympathy. The priest