Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
BIBLE PARADOXES 
By Glenn Pease 
CONTENTS 
INTRODUCTION 
CHAPTER 1 THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 
CHAPTER 2 THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Esther 2:19-3:6 
CHAPTER 3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5 
CHAPTER 4 MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET 1 
CHAPTER 5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based onHeb.10:32-34 
CHAPTER 6 THE FOLLY OF THE WISE Based on I King 11:1-13 
CHAPTER 7 THE POWER OF NEGATIVE THINKING Isa. 1:1-17 
CHAPTER 8 GOOD OUT OF EVIL PART II Based on James 1:12 
CHAPTER 9 THE PERPLEXITY OF PLEASURE Based on Eccles.2:1 
CHAPTER10 THE PLEASURE OF PERSPECTIVE Based on Psalm 84 
CHAPTER11 THE PLEASURE OF PAIN BASED ON PSALM 84:6 
CHAPTER12 GUILT CAN BE GOOD BASED ON PSALM 32:1-5 
INTRODUCTION 
Paradox and perspective 
Para means contrary and doxa means opinion, and so a paradox deals with contrary 
opinions or ideas which are seemingly so opposite they cannot both be true, but which are, in 
fact, both true. They sound contradictory but the really compliment each other. In paradox 
two opposite and contradictory ideas can be shown to be two parts of a greater whole larger 
than either of them alone. Two men can be looking at a shield from each side of it, and one 
says it is gold and the other that it is a silver shield. Both know they are right for they are 
looking at it right in front of their face. They can argue for ever and never convince the 
other to change their view. They can only resolve their conflict by going to the other side and 
seeing that a shield can be gold on one side and silver on the other. Both were right, but both 
were wrong too, because they only saw part of the whole truth about the shield. 
The false assumption is many conflicts is that if one side is certain they are right, any 
contrary idea must be wrong. This is false because it is possible for both to be right even 
though they seem contradictory. Paradox says that opposite perspectives can both be right. 
For example, when Durand, the Frenchman, visited London he saw such places as Waterloo 
station and Trafalgar square. He said to his wife, “These English are really odd, they seem to 
have a mania for naming places after defeats.” From his perspective as a Frenchman these
were defeats, but Waterloo and Trafalgar were great victories for the English. He failed to 
recognize that a battle can be both a defeat and a victory, just as every sports event is both a 
win and a loss, for their are always two sides. We need to recognize the same thing can be 
seen from more than one perspective. 
Take a snowstorm as an illustration. A family of 4 can see it from 4 different perspectives. 
The mother sees the snow as a source of beauty as she looks out of her picture window and 
sees her evergreens beautified with the white fluffy stuff. The father sees it as a nuisance as 
he has to shovel the drive way and be late for work because of the traffic mess. The son sees 
it as a source of income because the neighbors will pay him to shovel for them. The little girl 
sees it as a source of fun, for now she can use the new sled she got for her birthday. What 
could be more futile than a debate to determine which of them is right? Three of them find 
pleasure, and only one finds pain in the snow, and so can the issue be decided by majority 
vote? This would not change the fact that the father still has to suffer while the other three 
enjoy it. We need to face it. It is a paradox. A snowfall is both pleasure and pain. It is both 
beautiful and a nuisance. You cannot get everybody on the same side, for their are two sides, 
and both are real and legitimate. 
When Mark Twain visited Whistler in his studio he started to touch a certain painting. 
Whistler cried out, “Don’t touch that, it isn’t dry yet!” “I don’t mind,” said Twain, “I have 
gloves on.” They were on two different channels, and Mark 
Twain missed the point completely. He was not being sensitive to the perspective of Whistler 
who was concerned about his painting being ruined, and not about getting paint on Twain’s 
finger. Paul in Phil. 2:4 wrote, “Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but 
also to the interests of others.” In other words, recognize their are other perspectives than 
your own, and you need to be sensitive to them or you will be a self-centered person. 
Life is full of paradoxes. If you look at a stick in the water you see it as crooked. You know 
it is a straight stick, and yet it is bent to your vision. You are certain it is straight and yet you 
cannot see it as straight in the water. No matter how clearly you have it explained why it 
looks bent you cannot see it straight. Mentally you know it is, but visually you experience it 
as not straight. And so you have a paradox of a straight stick that is crooked because both 
are real at the same time. 
This reality can help a person escape prejudice. He may have been taught that other races 
are inferior to his, and so he cannot help but see them that way. But if he recognizes the 
reality of paradox, he can learn that what he sees is like that crooked stick. It is an illusion 
created by circumstance, but it is not objective reality. Other races are proven to be equal 
with his, and so he may have feeling left from his training that makes him see others in a bent 
way, but he can also know that what he feels is not the truth, and thereby overcome the 
subjective feeling and chose to act in accord with objective truth. 
We have to fight the tendency constantly of seeing reality only from our perspective. The 
poet gives an example. 
When offspring roll upon the floor, 
And kick their heels in rage,
They either need a spanking or 
Their going through a stage, 
Depending, with distinction fine, 
On whether they are yours or mine. 
We tend to see through eyes which favor ourselves at the expense of others. Identical 
behavior on our part is seen as a virtue, which in others we see as a vice. We are thrifty, but 
they are stingy. We have firm convictions, but they are stubborn as a mule. We are cautious, 
but they are slow pokes. We are courteous, but the other guy is a brown noser. We are 
zealous, but the other guy is a fanatic. We see ourselves as virtuous in doing the same things 
that other are doing, but which we call vices. 
Men are forever debating whether we should be right wing or left wing, when it should be 
conspicuous to everyone that God never made a bird yet with only one wing. They would 
never get off the ground if he did. It does not have to be one or the other, but we need the 
whole bird, and the perspectives of both the conservative mind and the liberal mind to get 
the whole picture. Anyone who is always just one or the other is narrow minded and does not 
deal with the real world. Dr. Billy Graham said that he was a conservative theologically, and 
a liberal socially. Can you be both a liberal and a conservative? Why not? It is no more 
unreasonable than the fact that a day is made up of both daytime and nighttime. They are 
opposites, but they are both real and a part of the whole. Man is not a saint or a sinner, but a 
saint and a sinner. He is both even though they are opposites. If you are going to deal with 
the whole man you need to see the reality of this paradox. Pascal saw it and said, “Man is the 
glory and scum of the universe.” 
1. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 
2:1-4 
Alexander Selkirk was one of those men who always had to 
learn the hard way. The records of his church in Scotland show 
that he was disciplined several times for causing trouble in the 
church. In May of 1703 he said good-bye to all that, and at age 
27 went off to sea. He tried to run things on the ship as he 
did church, and he got into a furious argument with the Captain. 
They were anchored off a small island four hundred miles from 
Chile. 
Alexander got so mad he packed up his possessions and went 
ashore. "You don't dare sail without me," he shouted to the 
Captain. The Captain was not impressed with his conviction, and 
gave the order to sail. Poor Alexander could not believe it. 
He thought he was indispensable. He was waiting out up to his 
arm pits pleading for the Captain to forgive him, but the 
Captain was as stubborn as he was, and he sailed away, never to 
return. 
Fortunately for Alexander the island had been inhabited by 
Jon Fernandez two centuries earlier, and he had left some goats
on the island. These gave him food and skins. For four years 
and four months he depended on them for survival. When he was 
finally rescued, he could hardly remember how to talk. When he 
got back to England he was a sensation, and several books were 
written about him. The most famous was fiction, but it used his 
experience as a model. The book was Robinson Crusoe. 
That was a tough way to learn to keep his mouth shut. It 
is so hard not to do something, or say something foolish or 
destructive when you are angry. Even great men often have to 
learn the hard way that loss of temper can be costly. Xerxes 
was the ruler of the Persian Empire, he could have anything he 
pleased, but he lost his wife, whom he truly treasured, because 
of his anger. Xerxes had a reputation for losing his temper 
when he could not have his own way. He once wanted to cross the 
waters of the hellespont, but it was so rough his troops could 
not build a bridge. He got so angry he took chains to the 
water, and he began to flog it. Like most temper tantrums, it 
was not very effective. 
It is so hard to play God when nature and others will not 
cooperate. The water would not stop for him, and his wife would 
not start for him, and he blew his stack. And why shouldn't he? 
He was the most powerful man in the world, and why should he not 
get angry for the same reason the rest of us get angry? Why do 
we get angry? Primarily because something or someone has 
spoiled our pleasure. We are not different from King Xerxes. 
He had his heart set on seeing all his noble leaders gape in 
envy as he revealed the beauty of his wife to them. Half the 
joy of possessing something is in showing it to those who don't. 
Vashti had the audacity to rob him of this pleasure. He blazed 
with anger within, because she would not grant his whim. 
If you examine your own life, you will discover that most 
of your anger is based on the hindrance of your pleasure. You 
have plans, and somebody does not cooperate, and the pleasure 
you hope for is lost, and you are angry. Children cry most 
often because they can't have their own way. Somebody is always 
hindering them from having their pleasure. They want to play 
with the new camera you just bought, and you insist it is not a 
toy, and there heart is broken. They want to run barefoot in a 
junk infested lot, and you deny them of their pleasure. On and 
on goes the list of pleasures a child desires that are 
constantly being hindered by parents, who get no pleasure out of 
picking up pieces of a two hundred dollar camera, and rushing to 
the emergency room for stitches. 
What we see then, is that from the beginning, life is a 
battle to see whose pleasures are met, and whose are denied. 
Striving for pleasure is a far more powerful factor in all of 
our lives then we realize. Because we do not examine our lives 
from the perspective of the pleasure motive, we look on the 
events of the book of Esther with some degree of shock. 
It is scandalous that every beautiful virgin in the empire was 
to be made available to the king, to meet his demand for 
pleasure. Keep in mind, he is the most powerful man in the 
world. The whole book revolves around his pleasure. What 
pleases him determines the life or death of every human being of
his time. If he pleases, whole nations are destroyed, 
and if he pleases, they are spared. God's providence had to 
work through His pleasure motive. 
The first two chapters reveal that he was dominated by 
sensual pleasure. His party life and sex life established the 
environment in which the entire story takes place. Xerxes is no 
different than the rulers of that part of the world today. A 
reporter who traveled to all of the oil rich Arab countries, and 
interviewed all of the kings and sheiks, reported that 
they lived just like Xerxes did. Wine, women, and song, and 
every pleasure man is capable of was a way of life. Xerxes is 
said to have offered a reward for anyone who could invent a new 
pleasure. This is the challenge today for those who have so 
much money they cannot think of any new way of spending it. 
The book of Esther is not dealing with something old and 
irrelevant, but rather, with a subject so real and relevant to 
all of us, but one that we often fail to think about seriously, 
the subject of pleasure. Before we get all bent out of shape 
about Xerxes, and his lust for pleasure, lets examine our own 
lives. When we do, we will discover that we are not so 
different from this sensual king. The main difference is that 
we do not have the power and wealth to command the pleasures he 
had, but the difference is really only one of degree. 
We too enjoy parties with good things to eat and drink, and we 
enjoy beautiful furniture and drapes. We enjoy nice clothes, 
and I have seldom heard of a Christian who does not enjoy sexual 
pleasure. 
The more we examine the Christian life, the more we begin 
to realize we are very pleasure oriented. We don't feel the 
lest guilt for enjoying the pleasure of music, fellowship, an 
all that being a part of the body of Christ involves. Why 
should we? Jesus enjoyed the social pleasures of His time. He 
enjoyed the party, the wedding, the feasting, 
the singing, the fun of fishing, and fellowship. So what we 
have is, the paradox of pleasure. 
It is both something we are to crave and seek and enjoy, and yet 
it is something that can be so dangerous that it can quickly 
lead us to fall, and be out of the will of God. Pleasure is 
both a virtue and a vice. 
The search for pleasure is the primary motivation behind 
the evil of man. Satan appealed to the pleasure nature to get 
man to fall. He said, taste the forbidden fruit and you will 
have the pleasure of being like God, and they jumped at the 
chance. But good is also motivated by pleasure. The Gospel is 
an appeal to the pleasure nature as well, for Jesus says, "Come 
unto me all ye who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give 
you rest." 
Jesus offers men the joy of eternal life, and the pleasure of 
abundant life. There is not available anywhere in the world a 
hope for greater pleasure than what Jesus offers those 
who put their faith in Him. 
What this means is we cannot afford to be reacting as 
Christians so often do. They look at Xerxes, and his six months
banquet of gluttony, drunkenness, and perpetual beautiful 
virgins for his lust, and they say this is disgusting. Then 
they think their mission in life should be to prevent as much 
pleasure as possible. This over reaction to evil pleasure in 
the world has caused Christians to totally misrepresent Christ, 
and pervert the Gospel so that it loses its appeal to most 
everyone but sadist who delight in pain. History is full of the 
folly of Christian ascetics, who thought they pleased God by 
pain rather pleasure. 
They wore hair shirts to itch and be miserable. They flogged 
themselves thinking that suffering was the key to 
sanctification. Fun and pleasure were so related to sin that 
misery 
and boredom were exalted to the level of virtues. 
To avoid this reaction to worldly pleasure we need to see 
where the Bible stands on the issue of pleasure. The first 
thing we see, as we examine God's Word, is that God is the 
Creator of pleasure. He made the world and man, and said it is 
very good, and He took pleasure in all that He had made. He 
made man with a nervous system capable of enjoying much pleasure 
of sight, sound, taste, smell, and feeling. He designed man to 
be a pleasure loving creature. Every pleasure we are capable of 
is a cause to thank God, for it is by His will we have that 
capacity. David acknowledges God as the source of all of life's 
pleasures in Psa. 36:7-8. "How precious is thy steadfast love, 
O God! The children of men take refuge in the shadow of thy 
wings. They feast on the abundance of thy house, and thou 
givest them drink from the rivers of thy pleasures." 
God gives rivers of pleasure, even in time, before the 
believers dwell by the River of Life, where all pain will be 
forever gone, and life will be endless pleasure, for, "At God's 
right hand our pleasures for ever more." (Psa. 16:11). God 
delights in the pleasures of His servants says Psa. 35:27. God 
is a personality who enjoys great pleasure Himself. 
Psa. 149:4 says, "For the Lord takes pleasure in His people." 
As we, as parents and grandparents, take pleasure in seeing our 
children grow and develop, so God delights in His children. 
God wanted the temple rebuilt in Jerusalem, and He said to 
the people in Hag. 1:8, 
"Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house, that I 
may take pleasure in it and that I may appear in my glory, says 
the Lord." God is no where revealed as a vast cosmic machine. 
God is a person who feels, and His goal is to accomplish what is 
good and pleasurable. Phil. 2:13 says, "For God is at work in 
you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure." Jesus 
said in Luke 12:32, "Fear not, little flock, for it is your 
Father's 
good pleasure to give you the kingdom." 
Let's get it straight in our minds, God is not a sadist who 
loves pain and delights in suffering . The goal of God is 
pleasure for Himself, and for all His people. He makes it clear 
in Ezek. 18:23. "Have I any pleasure in the death of the 
wicked, says the Lord God, 
and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?"
God's goal for every man is a goal of pleasure. Hell is pain 
and heaven is pleasure, and heaven is always God's goal. 
I looked in a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms, and found 
this list of the opposites of pleasure. Listen to them, and see 
if you catch the flow of heaven or hell. 
Displeasure Evil Desolation 
Sorrow Pain Anxiety 
Woe Hurt Burden 
Grief Wound Adversity 
Suffering Affliction Trouble 
Vexation Anguish Unhappiness 
Worry Despair Tribulation 
Sickness Misfortune 
This is not an ideal shopping list for Christmas, or any 
other day in life. In fact, the 
only place you can get that list fulfilled perfectly is in hell. 
Not a one of them will be a part of heaven. So we are stuck 
with an enormous paradox. The entire plan of God, and the goal 
of Christians, is pleasure. Yet, that seems to be the major 
problem of sinful man, and the primary method of worldliness. 
Even Plato could see it and say, "Pleasure is the greatest 
incentive to evil." It is the pleasure principle that leads men 
into every form of lust, and which takes them lower than the 
beast. Yet, it is the pleasure principle that leads men to the 
highest levels of godliness, and enables them to fulfill the 
purpose of God. 
The book of Esther is a perfect illustration of the paradox 
of pleasure. It begins with a feast that is dedicated to 
worldly pleasure, and gratification of the senses. It ends with 
the proclamation of a perpetual feast that will also gratify the 
senses, but will be in thanksgiving for the providence of God. 
The pleasure of the people of God at a banquet 
is no less enjoyable than that of the sensuous secularist. 
Xerxes had more of every sensual pleasure, but the fact is, he 
did not enjoy eating, sexuality, and other aesthetic 
pleasures anymore than the Jews did, or than Christians do 
today. 
How then can we distinguish between pleasures which are 
displeasing to God, and those which please Him? How can we 
unravel this paradox so we know which side we are on? 
How can we know if we are at Xerxes's banquet, or Esther's 
banquet? The first thing we need to do is to recognize pleasure 
is not evil. It is good, and from God. Then we need to 
recognize that all good can be perverted and abused. That is 
what evil is-it is good used in a way that God never intended. 
C. S. Lewis in The Screwtape Letters has the Sr. devil 
writing to the Jr. devil explaining the work of temptation. He 
writes, "Never forget that when we are dealing with any pleasure 
in its healthy and normal and satisfying form, we are, in a 
sense, on the Enemy's 
ground. I know we have won many a soul through pleasure. All 
the same, it is His invention, not ours. He made the pleasures; 
all our research so far has not enabled us to produce one. All 
we can do is to encourage the humans to take the pleasures which
our 
Enemy has produced, at times, or in ways, or in degrees, which 
he has forbidden." 
The tempters task is to get men to think, if a little is 
good, a lot must be better. If he can get men to use God's 
pleasures to excess, he can get them hooked, so that the very 
gifts of God become idols, that lead them astray from God. Such 
is the subtle plan of the deceiver, and it is a very effective 
plan. We live in a culture where pleasure is no longer 
a gift from God, for it has become god. Norman Lobsenz has 
written a book titled, 
Is Anybody Happy. It is a study of the American search for 
pleasure. The goal of life for 
Americans is a good time. Our national Mecca is Disney World. 
Pleasure is the alpha and omega of life. The national heroes 
are no longer the titans of industry, or the somber statesman, 
or solitary inventors. Now it is the movie star, the sports 
hero, and international playboy, who have taken their place. 
The important thing now is to have fun. Lobsenz writes, 
"Advertisers, never slow to sense a trend, have leaped on the 
bandwagon, and there is now hardly an artifact or an activity 
that is not intimately connected with spine-tingling happiness. 
Brushing your teeth with a certain tooth paste, of course-is 
fun. Cutting the grass-with a certain lawnmower-is exciting. 
Do you want to know the real joy of good living? Drink a 
certain beer....soap flakes give glamorous suds. It is fun to 
paint your house with so and so's paint. Eye glasses are 
bewitching. Light bulbs are romantic. Building materials are 
festive. Soft drinks are sociable. Kitchen appliances are 
smart. Anything you buy that is made of shining aluminum will 
mirror your laughter. Even paying the bills for these items is 
a pleasure if you have an account at a certain bank." Lobsenz 
says he expects someday to see a billboard with the bony finger 
of Uncle Sam pointing at him asking, "Have you had your fun 
today?" 
We are under a new morality-the fun morality. It says, if 
it feels good do it. It is not new of course, for Xerxes was a 
pro at it 2,500 years ago. Instead of feeling ashamed for 
having too much pleasure, from now on we are to feel guilty if 
we do not have enough. People are now going to psychiatrist and 
asking, "What is wrong with me? I can't let go and have enough 
fun." People feel so obligated to have fun they attack it with 
all the energy they use to put into achievement. This pursuit 
of pleasure often ends in broken marriages, broken lives, and 
death, especially for those who find their pleasure in alcohol 
and other drugs. 
Is the Christian approach to try and be a kill joy, and 
oppose pleasure, and call people back to a work ethic, where go 
go go is the battle cry? Not at all! The Christian is for 
pleasure too, for that is God's plan for man. The Christian 
simply needs to point out the folly of making pleasure an idol. 
It is not the end of life, but a means to a higher end. 
"Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever." We 
are into pleasure too, but because it is not an end in itself,
but a means to the end of enjoying God, we have an objective 
standard by which we measure the value of all pleasures. In 
other words, we count the cost. Satan does not want man to 
count the cost, for his whole strategy is to get men to choose 
pleasure at any cost. The cost factor is what enables the 
Christian to have a guide to legitimate pleasure. You can tell 
if you are being excessive in your pursuit of pleasure by what 
it is costing you. 
Any pleasure that costs you your growth in Christian 
fruitfulness is folly, and excessive pleasure. Jesus made this 
clear in the parable of the sower, where the seed that fell 
among the thorns did not lead to fruitfulness. He tells us in 
Luke 8:14, "There are those who hear, but as they go on their 
way they are choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of 
life, and their fruit does not mature." They pay too much for 
their pleasure. They lose the highest pleasure of life-the 
pleasure of pleasing God, and being what He wills, for the sake 
of pleasure that will pass away. They trade in their diamonds 
for marbles. 
The Gospel is not a call to forsake pleasure, but it is a 
call to rise to higher pleasure, 
and to enjoy that which lasts forever. The motive for all self-denial, 
which keeps the Christian from immoral pleasure, is the 
hope for enduring pleasure. Listen to Paul giving counsel to 
the rich Christians who could so easily indulge themselves in 
excessive pleasures. He writes in I Tim. 6:17-19, "As for the 
rich in this world, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set 
their hope on uncertain riches but on God who richly furnishes 
us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in 
good deeds, liberal and generous, 
thus laying up for themselves a good foundation for the future. 
So that they may take hold of the life which is life indeed." 
Paul is saying, you only go around once in this life, so do 
it with gusto. But for Paul, that does not mean to drink beer, 
it means to enjoy the higher and lasting pleasures of doing the 
will of God, which guarantees we will have abundant life now, 
and an eternal life of pleasure on the highest level. The 
Christian is one who evaluates pleasure, and does not just grab 
at it indiscriminately. He asks, does this enlarge, or does it 
enrich my Christian life, and my attitude of gratitude to God? 
The Christian is on the greatest pleasure trip possible. If we 
could not assert that the plan of Christ leads to the greatest 
pleasure for the greatest number, we would be saying that there 
is a better way. The fact is, no one even pretends to offer a 
better way than Christ. We can say with the advertisers who are 
confident of their products, "If you can find a better way than 
Christ-take it." 
When referring to God, it is an absolute truth that Father 
knows best. He forbids only those forms of pleasure which, in 
the long run, lead to pain greater than the pleasure. 
God never forbids any pleasure which will last, and be a part of 
your growth toward the goal of becoming like Him. He only 
forbids that which costs too much. Forbidden pleasure is a rip 
off. It costs you the favor of God, and usually has a kick back
of pain that far exceeds the pleasure. How often people take 
drugs to feel good, only to end up in jail or worse, and feeling 
rotten, and with problems that are now worse than before. 
Biblical morality is a fight back morality. It is a demand that 
you don't be a sucker, and get ripped off by cheap imitations. 
Jesus Christ, and He alone, offers the real thing-life 
abundant and life eternal. He paid and enormous cost, and 
endured the pains of hell, that we might enjoy the pleasures of 
heaven. Whatever price we need to pay to be loyal to Him is 
small cost for so great a gift. 
The martyr who suffers death rather than deny Christ, does so 
for pleasure. He knows the cost is nothing compared to what he 
will enjoy at Christ's right hand. That is why one of 
my favorite preachers, F. W. Boreham, said, "The tragedy of the 
age is not that people are getting too much pleasure, but that 
they are not getting enough." Life Xerxes, the world is 
pleasure mad, but in all of their sensual self-indulgence, they 
do not find the pleasure of peace and meaning, or eternal hope. 
They pursue pleasure as a god, and are left empty. The 
Christian pursues the will of God, and is filled with pleasure. 
The world grabs the rose and clutches and thus must bare 
the pains of the thorn. The Christian does not need to grasp 
it, but can enjoy it, and not cling, for he knows he cannot lose 
the rose even if it dies, for he is a child of the rose's 
Creator, and knows the rose will be his forever. Honey is 
bought to dear by those who risk the bees stingers. The 
Christian is one who is wise in his pleasure seeking. He 
enjoys all God has given us to enjoy, but avoiding excess and 
the forbidden, knowing this leads to the greatest pleasure. 
Contrary to the view that Christianity is opposed to the 
search for pleasure, the opposite is the case. We have found 
the very thing man is searching for, the way to the highest most 
lasting pleasure of which man is capable. With this highest 
goal of salvation settled, the Christian then can enjoy the 
lesser pleasures of life more completely, for they are not so 
essential that he has to cling to them for meaning. The highest 
and permanent 
being assured in Christ, he can relax, and enjoy the passing 
without the risk of idolatry. 
To sum it up, the paradox of pleasure is that the pursuit 
of pleasure can lead you to the pit of hell, or to the pinnacle 
of heaven. It is life's most dangerous or delightful path to 
travel. 
The ecstasy of victory, or the agony of defeat, awaits all who 
travel it. Which you find depends on whether Xerxes is your 
example, or Jesus Christ. You either do what pleases you with 
no higher loyalty than your own pleasure, or you do what pleases 
God, with His will as your motive for rejecting or accepting 
pleasure. Those who choose the way of Christ, saying, not my 
will but thine be done, will enjoy at God's right hand pleasure 
for ever more.
2. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther 
2:19-3:6 
Newscaster Paul Harvey, some years ago, told his radio 
listeners this remarkable story from World War II. From the 
Island of Guam one of our mighty B-29 bombers took off for 
Kokura, Japan. It was carrying deadly cargo as it circled high 
above the city. A cloud covered the city, so the plane kept 
circling for half an hour, and then for three quarters of an 
hour, and finally after 55 minutes the gas supply was reaching 
the danger zone. The plane had to leave its primary target, and 
go to a secondary target where the sky was clear. Then the 
command could be given, "Bombs away!" 
Only weeks later did the military receive information that 
chilled many a heart. Thousands of allied prisoners of war, the 
largest concentration of Americans in enemy hands, had been 
moved to Kokura a week before the bombing mission. Had it not 
been for that cloud, thousands of Americans now alive would have 
been killed, for that B-29 was carrying the world's second 
atomic bomb. It was taken instead to the secondary target- 
Nagasaki. 
The direction history takes, so often is determined by such 
minor things. Small things play a big role in life. The 
illustrations of this are numerous, yet it is a truth that 
demands balance, or it leads to folly. God's providence is 
constantly working through little things, 
but not every little thing is of significance. To think so can 
lead to becoming neurotic, for you will search for meaning in 
every trivial event of life. The danger of this is illustrated 
by the little girl who came running into her house sobbing. She 
threw herself into her mothers arms, and cried out, "God doesn't 
love me anymore!" The mother was shocked and puzzled at what 
could produce such a crisis. "Why do you say that?" she asked, 
assuring her that God does love her. "No mother!" she wailed. 
"I know He doesn't love me. I tried Him with a daisy." In case 
you have never tried that less than fool proof method of 
predicting love, by pulling off petals to, "He loves me, he 
loves me not," let me recommend that you never start, if you 
are going to take it seriously. 
The fact is, there are little things that are just little 
things. They are minor and insignificant. They are not subtle 
and hidden methods by which great things are accomplished. I 
don't think it is a healthy exercise to go through life trying 
to figure out if God is trying to say something through every 
minor event. When God does work through such events, it is only 
known as we look back and see the minor event as a link in the 
chain that leads to the fulfillment of His purpose. 
This is what we see in the life of Mordecai. As a cloud 
saved many Americans, so a conversation saved many Jews. 
Mordecai over heard a couple of the kings servants plotting to 
assassinate him. This was very common in the ancient world, 
because the only way to get rid of an absolute monarch was by 
assassination. They never quit, and could not be voted out, and
so violence was the only method open for change. Many of kings 
of Persians were assassinated, including Xerxes. He was saved 
by Mordecai, but fourteen years later one of his servants 
succeeded in his plot to kill him. 
Assassination was common even in Israel. In I Kings 15 we 
read of how Baasha conspired to kill Nadab, the king of Israel, 
after he had reigned only two years. Baasha became king then, 
and reigned 24 years, but he was also a evil king, so nothing 
was gained by the people in this politics of violence. His son 
Elah became king, and 2 years later his servant Zimri 
assassinated him, and became king. Once you killed the king, 
you had to kill the whole family, and many of his friends, so 
the violence of the ancient world was terrible. 
There are other gruesome assassinations in the Old Testament. I 
point this out so that we can see clearly the nature of 
Mordecai's political decision, when he chose to become an 
informer, and revealed the conspiracy against Xerxes 
We see in Mordecai's experience good reason for why 
political decisions are so paradoxical, and why it is that 
politicians are often so variable. We see it in Mordecai's 
patriotism. In the last paragraph of chapter 2 we see Mordecai 
as a defender of the state, 
and then in the first paragraph of chapter 3 we him as a defier 
of the state. He first saved Xerxes life, and then he turns 
around and refuses to obey his orders of bowing to Haman, 
his highest representative. In the one place Mordecai is a 
conservative, and in the next he is a liberal. In the one he is 
a loyal citizen, and in the next he is a rebel. 
We need to study both sides of the patriotism of Mordecai, 
for the Bible and history make it clear that the Christian who 
cannot be paradoxical in his politics and patriotism will not be 
able to live a life of wisdom in relation to the state. The 
paradox is, inconsistency 
in relationship to man is the only way you can be consistent in 
your relationship to God. 
Let's focus first on the positive side. 
I. MORDECAI AS DEFENDER OF THE STATE. 
By defender, I mean Mordecai risked his life in order to a 
loyal citizen, and to maintain the order of the state by 
reporting the conspiracy to kill the king. Mordecai was a 
foreigner, and he could have had the attitude that this is not 
my country, so what do I care? 
The believer is one who knows God is the God of order, and 
unless the leaders of a state are so corrupt that a revolution 
is demanded, those leaders should be honored. Many Christians 
have, and do now, live under tyrants, and forms of government 
that we could not tolerate as Americans. They live with far 
less freedom than us, but they still love their country, and are 
patriotic. 
One of the reasons the Jews have been able to become 
leaders in nations all over the world is because they have 
practiced the principle of honoring and defending the state they
are in. Paul in Rom. 13 lays this down as a principle for 
Christians in any state. "Let every person be subject to the 
governing authorities. For there is no authority except from 
God..." They are to receive our respect and honor. By 
practicing this Christianity has been able to thrive under all 
sorts of governments. 
Mordecai was a great example of this principle, and thus a 
great asset to the Persian Empire. By becoming an informer he 
took a great risk for the sake of Xerxes, for informers tend to 
get their names added to the hit list. Vincent Teresa was the 
number 3 man in the New England Mafia. He had stolen 10 million 
for himself in crime, and 150 million for his bosses and 
confederates. When he turned informer, back in the early 70's, 
dozens of big times mobsters ended up in prison. It took the 
FBI's most brilliant minds 
working constantly just to keep him alive. Assassination squads 
were everywhere. Doctors, lawyers, and even policeman were paid 
by Mafia to get him. It may have not have been this hot for 
Mordecai, but had the assassins found out he was the informer, 
he would have been their first target. He took risks to be a 
defender of the state. 
He was a hero of the state, and he was later greatly 
rewarded for his loyalty. Patriotism 
played a major role in God's providence in his life, and all of 
Israel. Patriotism is a virtue, 
but we must see that it also has its limitations. When the 
state is exalted to the level of God, then defense of the state 
is idolatry. Patriotism can have many motives, and this is 
why it is only a relative, and not an absolute, virtue. Even 
the Mafia are patriotic towards America, for its freedoms make 
it the greatest place on earth for crime. Vincent Teresa 
closes his book, My Life In The Mafia, with this paragraph. 
“Let me tell you something: I'm the proudest guy in the 
world to be an American. Before I went to jail I had 
plenty of chances to take off and go live in a villa on 
the Italian coast, but I wouldn't leave this country. I'd 
rather spend 20 years in the can in America than 20 
years free in Italy. The reason is, I love this country, 
and that's the way it is with most mob guys. The mob 
will not stand for anything against this country. They'll 
rob from government arsenals and rob government 
stock and sell it; but if they could discover that anyone's 
trying to overthrow the country or anything like that, 
they'll fight him. Most mob guys that I know of vote. 
We vote whatever is the best way to make money. If 
its going to be one of these guys who is going to be on 
the reform kick all the time, we'll all band together and 
vote against him.” 
There is a higher percentage of the Mafia who vote, then of 
born again Christians. So what I am saying is that patriotism is 
good, but not an absolute good. If not modified by a higher 
loyalty to God, it can become an evil. Thus, we turn to the 
other side of Mordecai and see-
II. MORDECAI AS THE DEFIER OF THE STATE. 
Verse 2 of chapter 3 makes it clear that bowing to Haman was 
not a mere matter of courtesy, it was the law of the land, for 
the king had commanded it. Not to bow was an act of defiance 
against the state. Mordecai refused to bow. He had just risked 
his life for Xerxes, but now when there is no risk at all 
involved, he will not join the others and bow. 
What has happened to his patriotism as a loyal citizen? 
Mordecai seems to be inconsistent. After all, he let his 
daughter marry the king, so he is related to him, and yet he 
will not pay him the respect of bowing to his highest 
representative. 
The result of this stubborn refusal is that Haman becomes 
hateful, and determines the entire Jewish race will pay for this 
insubordination. Either Mordecai is a stubborn fool, 
or he is standing for a principle more precious than life 
itself. The only clue we have is in verse 4 where Mordecai's 
only defense for his action is that he was a Jew. In other 
words, we are dealing here with an issue of religious liberty, 
or the multifaceted and complex issue of the separation of 
church and state. What Mordecai is saying is that as a Jew 
there is a limit as to how far he can go in conforming to the 
state. He could risk his life for the state, 
but he could not give up his religious liberty by bowing to 
Haman, for he would be giving to the state the allegiance he 
owed only to God. The issue here is really a matter of 
idolatry. 
Do we obey God or man? 
The whole thing would be sheer folly if it was a matter of 
personal pride. If Mordecai just didn't like Haman, his action 
would be disgraceful. He risks the lives of his people out of 
stubborn pride. If we see it as a battle for religious liberty, 
however, then we can see 
what has been a pattern of God's providence all through history. 
Mordecai had his priorities straight. God is number one, and 
the state can never be obeyed if it attempts to 
usurp that place in our lives. The defenders of the state must 
become defiers of the state when the state threatens to crush 
religious liberty. The state has a right to our loyalty as long 
as it recognizes its place in God's providence. When it begins 
to encroach on God's domain, then our loyalty to God demands 
that we defy the state. The state becomes Satanic when it 
demands of us allegiance due only to God. We must chose then 
either to 
deify the state, or defy the state. 
We know the issue of bowing to Haman was an attempt to 
deify the state, for we have the record of Herodotus the ancient 
historian. He tells us of others who came to Xerxes, 
and who refused to acknowledge him as god. He tells of the 
Lacedoemonians whom the guards forced to their knees before 
Xerxes, yet, they refused to bow their heads, for they said they 
had not come to Persia for the purpose of worshipping a man. 
Xerxes excused them from bowing, for he had respect for their 
religious liberty. Haman, you will note,
never told Xerxes that his hatred of the Jews and Mordecai 
stemmed from Mordecai's refusal to bow to him. This was never 
reported to Xerxes at all, for if it had been, he would have 
nipped it in the bud right there, for he allowed for religious 
liberty. 
Haman is the culprit in the book of Esther, for his 
personal hatred, based on his desire to be treated like deity, 
is the cause for all the evil in the book. He plotted to get 
all the Jews killed so Xerxes would never even know why. What 
we are dealing with here is a corrupt politician in an otherwise 
reasonably just government. Haman had let power go to his head, 
and he will not tolerate being treated as secondary to God. He 
will get revenge 
on those who dare to put God first. The lesson of Esther is 
that the believer can never do anything other than defy those 
who presume to take God's place. The history of America 
revolves around this basic principle. 
A hundred years before the revolutionary war, king Charles 
II of England demanded that the Mass. colony relinquished its 
religious liberty, and let the Church of England control things, 
with only church members having the right to vote. The Puritans 
were enraged, and went into their pulpits preaching that they 
must defy the kings orders. Better that they die free than 
submit to such tyranny. The king heard of their rebellion, and 
ordered 5,000 troops to sail to Mass. to crush the rebellion. 
Increase Mather called for a day of prayer and fasting, and 
later they learned that king Charles had died on that very day 
of 1685. The result was the army never set sail. The Puritans 
were convinced that defiance to a state which threatens 
religious liberty is obedience to God. This principle 
became the foundation for the American Revolution. 
The result is we are a nation where the right to defy the 
government is guaranteed. 
If the state tries to interfere with our religious liberty, we 
can take the state to the supreme court, and fight for our 
rights. We have a Constitution which gives us a right to 
protest 
and demonstrate against our governments policies. Thank God for 
freedom that most of the world has never known. What we have is 
based on the basic truth that man has the right to put God 
first, and to defy any authority that tries to take that first 
place in our lives. 
Most of us have never lived through a period where the 
state is deified, and demanded absolute allegiance. Hopefully 
we will never have to, but the Christians under Hitler had to. 
I never realized until recently that Hitler established his own 
church in Germany. It was called The German Church Of Positive 
Christianity. Its design was to counter-act all Christian 
opposition, and destroy Christianity. It was extremely 
effective, and won most of the youth of Germany. Julius 
Leuthenses wrote, "Adolf Hitler is own living witness of the 
present era, who confirms the good work of the eternal Divine 
Spirit in history, and who, 
through his activity, enables us to understand in a new way the
teachings of Christ and His mission. Our watchword is not that 
Hitler is equal to Christ, but: Through Hitler to Jesus 
Christ." 
That is just the beginning. Soon the preaching of the 
cross was forbidden in church. 
The picture of Hitler was hung in front of all churches, and he 
was referred to in official statements as the way, the truth, 
and the light. All Germans were urged to die for him, 
and make their dying words heil Hitler. Hitler was so clever, 
only the devil himself could have been guiding him, for he 
completely revised Christianity, and made Nazism a perverted 
Christianity. He declared mount Hesselberg his sacred mountain, 
and Julius Streicher his high priest. Standing before the 
bonfire he said, "When we look into the flames of this holy 
fire, and throw our sins into them, we can descend from this 
mountain 
with clean souls. We do not need priests and ministers. We 
have become our own priests." 
Hitler actually became a god to millions of people who 
could not see their folly until it was to late. I share this 
because Hitler and Haman were two of a kind. There pride, 
racial 
hatred, and abuse of power make them brothers of the pit. Both 
sought to wipe out the Jewish race. But there were Mordecai's 
in Hitler's day as well. They defied the state, 
and fought Hitler, and they made a difference. The tragic fact 
is, these Mordecai's were two few in number. The majority of 
Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, were deceived by 
Hitler's clever use of patriotism. The people were whipped into 
a religious frenzy of love and loyalty to the Fatherland. 
Hitler could do not wrong, and Germany could do no wrong. The 
Patriotic fervor so captivated Christians, that the voices of 
the church in opposition were muted. Hitler was free to do the 
works of Satan with little resistance. 
Millions of Christians cooperated in the killing of 6 million 
Jews. 
It is the story of history repeating itself over and over 
again, because of idolatry. 
God's people bowed down to a false god, and as always, the 
result is tragic judgment. 
Had there been more Mordecai's defying the state when it began 
to encroach on God's territory, the tragic and demonic history 
of Germany could have been avoided. Many Christian leaders are 
writing today of the danger of an American Civil Religion. It 
uses Christian terminology, just as Hitler did, but it is not 
Christian. It is a state religion that is designed to convince 
Christian people that everything the state does is the will of 
God. It is a powerful political tool. 
Because of the ever present danger of the state becoming a 
god, the Christian must be all the more conscious of the need to 
exalt the Lordship of Jesus. Nothing is Christian, 
no matter how good, or how American, which does not bow to Jesus 
Christ, and confess Him as Lord. Mordecai, as a Jew, would bow 
to none but Jehovah, and you and I, as Christians, can bow to
none but Jesus. Because it is so, we must be ready to both 
defend and defy the state. 
3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5 
The Emperor Trajan said to Rabbi Joshua, "You teach that your 
God is everywhere. I should like to see Him." The Rabbi 
replied, "God's presence is everywhere, but He cannot be seen. 
No mortal eye can behold His glory." The Emperor insisted, 
however, and so the Rabbi said, "Let us begin then by first 
looking at one of his servants. The Emperor consented to this, 
and so followed the Rabbi out into the open. "Now," said the 
Rabbi, "Gaze into the splendor of the sun." "I cannot," said 
the Emperor, "The light dazzles me." The Rabbi responded, "Thou 
art unable to endure the light of one of his servants, and canst 
thou expect to behold the resplendent glory of the Creator. 
Would not such a light annihilate thee." 
The Jews had a higher concept of God than all ancient 
peoples, because God revealed Himself to them as a God of 
glory, light, and splendor. The Old Testament has many 
descriptions of God like that given in Hab. 3:3-4. "His glory 
covered the heavens, and His praise filled the earth. His 
splendor was like the sun rise; rays flashed from His hand, 
where His power was hidden." It was because of this knowledge 
of the glory of God that the Jews were an optimistic people. A 
man's character is determined largely by the character of the 
God he worships. If one worships a god who is a tyrant, and 
unpredictable, and without mercy, but cruel, it is not likely he 
will be a man of flaming joy. Luther lived for years with a 
false concept of God, and as a result, lived in fear and dread. 
Most religions have had such a dark concept of God that the 
followers of these religions seldom knew what it was to be truly 
joyful and at peace. 
Many ancient peoples, and peoples yet today, whose God's 
are made in the image of man, and are only depraved supermen, 
cruel and immoral, are no more optimistic than the materialist 
who says, "I feel the universe is one huge, dead, immeasurable 
steam engine, rolling on, in its dead indifference, to grind us 
limb from limb." You can't expect persons like that to be 
bursting with optimism, and bubbling with joy. On the other 
hand, when people have the concept of God as He is revealed in 
Scripture, it leads to optimism and joy. This was true in the 
Old Testament, even before God fully revealed Himself in Jesus 
Christ. 
The Jews began their day at sundown, rather than at sunup. 
All their festivals and holidays begin at night, and their 
Sabbath also begins at night. All of this was to symbolize 
their optimism and confidence in the God of light. Anyone can 
have confidence in the day, and look forward to a bright day 
when the sun rises, but the Jews began their rejoicing as the 
sun sank to symbolize their confidence that even in the darkness 
light will prevail, and a new day will dawn. Tomorrow always 
comes for the believer. Even death cannot change that. Such
was the attitude of the Jews who had only a shadow of the full 
revelation yet to come. How much greater ought our joy and 
optimism to be who stand in the full light? Paul in II Cor. 4:6 
writes, "For God, who said, "Let light shine out of darkness," 
made His light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the 
knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ." 
We have a message as superior to the Old Testament, as it 
was to the pagan darkness surrounding it. That is why John, 
after stating that his purpose for writing this book was that 
the joy of believers might be full, immediately announces the 
truth on which all Christian joy is based, which is, the truth 
that God is light. This morning we want to examine this primary 
message and its meaning. First let's look at the message 
itself. 
I. THE MESSAGE. John has built us up to a point of 
expectation. He has made great statements of his aim to share 
with us truths that will lead to fullness of fellowship, and 
fullness of joy. We ought to be standing on our tiptoes 
breathlessly longing to see what it is he is going to declare. 
In verse 5, after this stimulating introduction, John says, this 
is it! Here it is! This is the message that we have received, 
and now pass it on to you. This is no matter of speculation and 
theory, this is the message we have heard from Christ Himself, 
and now declare to you, and that message is, God is light and in 
Him is no darkness at all. We see a positive and negative side 
to this message. 
A. Positive-God is light. This is the strongest statement 
in the whole Bible about Gods nature as light. Many text 
describe the splendor of God, and the light of His presence, and 
that He dwells in light unapproachable, and that He is the 
author of all light, but here alone do we find the statement 
that God is light. Nothing stronger can be said. This is as 
far as human language can go in relating God and light. God is 
light. Light is of the very essence of God's nature. 
It is important, however, that we recognize that this is 
not the whole truth about God's nature. It is but one aspect of 
what He is. John will tell us He is also Law, Life, and Love, 
and underneath all of these is the foundational fact that He is 
personal. Light is impersonal, and if this was our main concept 
of God, we would have only a God who was a great impersonal 
source of all energy-a Divine Dynamo. 
We must ever keep in mind that light and love, and all other 
attributes of God are attributes of a Person. This means, it is 
God who is light, and not light that is God. 
This was the mistake of many people who began to worship the 
creation rather than the Creator. They worshipped the sun, 
moon, and stars, for they reversed the truth and said, light is 
God. This is false. The light of the sun is not God, and the 
light of all other bodies is not God. God as light is the 
ultimate source of all light, but He is not that light. All 
physical light is from God, and is a symbol of what He is in 
Himself. 
All physical reality is what it is because God is what He
is. Science can tell us what the sun does, and how it is the 
source of all life on earth, but it is the Bible that tells us 
why this is so. It is so because God is light. His creation 
resembles His nature. The universe is a symbol of what God is. 
It is not God, but is made by God, and is separate from Him, but 
it is an expression of what He is. This is why all life depends 
on light, for all life depends on God, and God is light. This 
is why the earth revolves around the sun which is the source of 
all life, because only as men put God into the center of their 
lives, and revolve around Him, will they have light and life. 
All of this is simply saying God has made the universe, and 
physical light, as a pattern of what is true in the spiritual 
realm. God is in the spiritual realm what the sun is in the 
physical realm. He is the source of all light and life. As 
light is the absolute in science, so God is the absolute in the 
spiritual realm. 
Thou art, O God, the life and light 
Of all this wondrous world we see; 
Its glow by day, its smile by night, 
Are but reflections caught from Thee; 
Where'er we turn, Thy glories shine, 
And all things fair and bright are Thine. 
The very first thing that God called good was light. In 
Gen. 1:4 God saw that the light was good. It was His first 
stroke of the brush on the canvas of reality, and it was a 
masterpiece already. God did not make anything in the dark. He 
began His project of creation just as we usually begin ours, by 
turning on the light. Light is the link between the Creator and 
creation. Light is part of the nature of God, and it is the 
foundation of all that God has made. When you study light, you 
are into both science and theology. Many of the great 
scientists have known this. They have seen that life is 
dependent on light, and that the Creator of life had to be a God 
of light. 
Dr. Michael Pupin, the great inventor, philosopher, and 
teacher, got his start in scientific research by watching the 
stars as a shepherd boy in the Hungarian hills. 
All his life, as he studied light, he was devoted to the God of 
light. He wrote, 
"I found in the light of stars a heavenly language which 
proclaims the glory of God. Each burning star is a focus of 
energy, of life-giving activity which it pours out lavishly into 
every direction; it pours out the life of its own heart, in 
order to beget new life. What a vista that opens to our 
imagination! What new beauties are disclosed in the words of 
Genesis: 'God...breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; 
and man became a living soul.' The light of the stars is a part 
of the life-giving breath of God. I never look now upon the 
starlit vault of heaven without feeling this divine breath and 
its quickening action upon my soul. 
Kepler, after discovering the laws that govern the speeds 
of the planets, prayed, "Dear Lord, who hast guided us to the 
light of Thy glory by the light of nature, thanks be Thee.
Behold, I have complete the work to which Thou hast called me, 
and I rejoice in the creation whose wonder thou hast given me to 
reveal unto men. Amen." 
The power of life is in light, and without light life 
cannot continue. We could get into biology here, but man's new 
discovery of the power of light is more fascinating. 
Albert Einstein back in 1905 wrote a paper on light that won him 
the Nobel Prize. In it he proved that light is both a wave and 
a particle, and so light is a paradox, and has the freedom to be 
different things in different experiments. He predicted then 
that man would be able to some day use light in a very intense 
and focused ray. In 1960 Dr. Theodore Maiman made and used the 
first laser, and since this, many new lasers have been developed 
for doing what man could never do before. Now, by the power of 
light, the life of man is being radically changed. In our life-time 
light has changed almost every facet of our lives. 
The books I checked out to study light were checked out by 
means of a laser light. 
The groceries we purchase our read by a laser light. Laser 
light can cut steel and even diamonds. Lasers are used for eye 
surgery, so that those who once would be blind are now made to 
see. Miracles that Jesus did as the light of the world are now 
being done by light, which also has Him as its author and 
creator. The military uses lasers in missals and other 
weapons. The whole security systems of the world depend on 
lasers. Laser optical discs can hold the entire Encyclopedia 
Brittanica on one side. There seems to be no end to the power 
and blessings that man is finding in the power of light. If 
God lets history go on into the 21st century, man will create a 
whole new world by the power of light. And if God ends history 
soon, the result will be the same, for in eternity we will dwell 
with God in that city filled with the light of His presence. 
However the story of history goes, we can be optimists as 
Christians, for we are heading for the light. Georgia Harkness 
wrote, 
Our light grows dim, the air is thick with gloom, 
And everywhere mens souls are crushed with fears. 
Yet high above the carnage and the gloom 
The call resounds across the teeming years, 
Lift high Christ's cross! Serve God and trust His might! 
I do believe the world is swinging toward the light. 
Light is not only the coming thing, because Jesus, the 
light, is coming, but He is already here, and says in John 8:12, 
"I am the light of the world: He who follows me will not walk 
in darkness, but will have the light of life." Gilchrist Lawson 
wrote, 
The one who made the earthly sun 
So full of power of warmth and 
might, 
Can cause the Sun of Righteousness 
To bathe the soul in floods of 
light. 
The greatest changes in life are always based on what man
does with his physical or spiritual light. Jesus was the light 
that lightens every man said John. He was and is the light of 
the world. He was and is the source of life that is eternal, 
for all life needs light, and He is the only light that can 
never be put out, and so He is the only source of eternal life. 
Light that we see is self revealing. One does not need to 
light a match to see if his flashlight is on. But all men are 
blind to most of the light God has made a part of reality. We 
see only the six colors of the rainbow which is white light 
devided up into its six different wave lengths. But this is a 
mere fraction of light. There are cosmic rays, gamma rays, x-rays, 
ultraviolet rays, infrared rays, television, radar, short 
wave, standard and long radio waves, and long electric waves. 
These ten different categories of light we cannot see. But man 
has learned how to use these invisible sources of light to do 
wonders in life. So the challenge of the Christian life is to 
recognize there is great power available in the realm of the 
invisible. Paul says in II Cor. 4:18, "So we fix our eyes not 
on what is seen, but what is unseen. For what is seen is 
temporary, but what is unseen is eternal." There is power for 
life abundant in the light of Christ's unseen presence, and in 
the light of the illuminating power of the Holy Spirit. We need 
to pray, 
Light of the world, illumine this darkened earth of Thine, 
Till everything that's human be filled with the Divine. 
There is no physical factor in all reality that can better 
be used as a symbol of the nature of God, than light, for as 
Alford, the Greek scholar said, "It unites in itself purity,and 
cleanness, and beauty, and glory, as no other material object 
does." Light is the most spiritual of all the things we know in 
the realm of the physical. The more we know about light and its 
blessings, the more we will understand the glory and splendor of 
God, who is light, and the source of all lights. 
Then John adds to his positive message a statement which 
is- 
B. Negative-in Him is no darkness at all. The Greek here 
is very emphatic. There is a double negative here, which is 
permitted in Greek, and would sound like this in English, "There 
is not none at all." This is the concept that is the basis for 
a common bond among believers, and is the basis for much joy. 
The positive without his strong negative would not distinguish 
Christianity from the Gnostics and many other false religions. 
The Gnostics, like the ancient Persians, had a dualism in their 
concept of deity, in which, there was both light and darkness in 
God. Many others have also had concepts of God which while 
recognizing Him to be glorious, also attributed to Him much 
evil. The Christian revelation rises to the heights of a God 
who is absolutely pure, and is not the origin of any evil. 
This becomes the basis for our fullness of joy, for the God 
and Father of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is light without 
darkness. Even the sun has spots, but not our God, for He is 
perfect light, and the source of all good, but no evil. Any 
idea of God that implies He is the source of evil is 
inconsistent with the New Testament revelation. E.S. Jones
tells the story of the little girl who was playing with a friend 
when a cloud came up and covered the Sun. She looked up and 
said, "That mean old God again, always spoiling our fun." The 
mother heard it and that night she told the father. He was 
shocked and did not understand where in the world she would get 
such a concept of God. They punished her by making her say her 
prayers ten times. Imagine, prayers being made as a punishment, 
and yet they wondered where she got her concept of a cruel God. 
Parents may in many ways convey to their children concepts of 
God that include spots and shadows of darkness. This message 
of John must be our guide. God is light and in Him is no 
darkness at all. 
We need the light of God to guide us so that we do not blot 
His image with the darkness of our own ignorance and faulty 
faith. Let our prayer be that of Constance Milman. 
Lord send thy light, 
Not only in the darkest night, 
But in the shadows, dim twilight, 
Wherein my strained and aching sight 
Can scarce distinguish wrong from right, 
Then send thy light. 
The light of God is known by the fact that in it is no 
darkness at all. Satan himself can appear as an angel of light, 
and the world uses light to glorify all its evil, but we need 
not be seduced by these false lights if we keep this absolute 
negative in mind-no darkness at all. Wordsworth put it, "But 
ne'er to a seductive lay, let faith be given. Nor deem that 
light which leads astray, is light from heaven." This then, is 
the message that is essential to making our fellowship unique 
and joy complete. Now, let us consider some further meanings 
contained in this message. 
II. THE MEANINGS. A message like this is filled with more 
meaning than we can begin to comprehend. To say that God is 
light sheds more light on His nature than we have eyes to see, 
but what we can see is important to look at. The first thing we 
want to look at is- 
A. The Ethical Meaning. 
This is really the primary meaning that John is 
conveying in this context. God is absolutely pure. God is 
righteousness, and in Him is no sin at all. That is why John 
goes on to say, "If we say we have fellowship with God and walk 
in darkness we are liars," for God cannot fellowship with men 
who walk in darkness. He is light, and light has nothing in 
common with darkness, and, therefore, fellowship is impossible. 
A man living in sin can no more walk with God than fire and 
gasoline can have fellowship together. God is absolutely 
ethically pure, and that is why Christians must constantly 
confess their sins and be cleansed by the blood of Christ, for 
it is the only way we can truly have fellowship with God. 
In this context John makes clear there are two ways of 
thinking that are false, and lead to false living. One is to 
imply that there is any sin in God, and two is to deny that 
there is sin in man. The Christian must be clear on both 
points. God is light, and is pure, with no darkness at all, but
no man, except he who was God incarnate, and the light of the 
world, is totally pure, and without some degree of darkness due 
to sin. Christian ethical thinking must be based on these two 
truths. The Gnostics denied them, and the result was all kinds 
of unethical and immoral conduct. 
Let this principle be a guide. God is far more than we can 
think, but He is never less than what we can think. This means, 
if you can think of a higher concept of God than the one you now 
have, the one you now have is a false concept. God can never be 
less than the highest you can conceive. Whenever men talk about 
God, you can know if they speak of the true God, or one of their 
own making, by simply asking, is the God they speak of the 
highest and purest that man can conceive. If the God they speak 
of cannot measure up to this standard, he is not the God who is 
light, and in whom is no darkness at all. 
B. The Intellectual Meaning. 
When we say a person has seen the light, we mean the 
truth has been grasped by the mind. Light and truth are often 
synonymous. This could be paraphrased, God is truth and in Him 
is no error at all. It means, not only that God is absolutely 
pure, but He is also absolutely wise. This is again a basis for 
great joy for the believer. He has a resource like no other. 
Jesus said the Holy Spirit would lead His disciples into all 
truth. He can do this, for as light, He knows all truth. 
All our knowledge, sense, and sight 
Lie in deepest darkness shrouded. 
Til Thy Spirit brakes our night, 
With the beams of truth unclouded. 
There is much more meaning in this message-the theological, 
biological, emotional, but we can't cover them all. What we 
have looked at, however, ought to make it clear how great a 
message this is, and how a deeper understanding of it will lead 
to a greater fellowship and joy in the believers life. Praise 
God for who He is for God is light. 
4. MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET1:2 
A snowstorm made it impossible for a guess speaker to get to the 
church where he was to preach. Therefore, a local man was asked 
to come in as a substitute. The speaker began by explaining the 
meaning of substitute. If you break a window he said, and then 
place a cardboard there instead--that is a substitute. After 
his sermon, a woman came up to him, shook his hand and wishing 
to compliment him said, "You are no substitute. You are a real 
pane." Unfortunately, verbal communication does not reveal how 
a word is spelled, and so, if he heard "pain" rather than "pane" 
as she intended, he would have received a message just the 
opposite of what she meant to convey. We must constantly be 
aware of the complications of language if we hope to effectively 
communicate.
Words can be alike and yet be very different depending on 
the context. If I say you have good vision, or you have good 
sight, these words are very close in meaning. 
But if I say my daughter is a vision, and yours is a sight, I am 
in trouble, for some how they do not remain synonymous in this 
context. 
When we come to the word grace, or charis in the Greek, we 
are dealing with one word that can mean opposite things 
depending upon the context. We miss the complexity of this word 
because in our English translations there are 11 different 
English words used to translate this one Greek word. We are not 
even aware most often that charis is being used. The root idea 
of the word is that which is pleasing, or which gives pleasure. 
From there it develops numerous connections with various kinds 
of pleasure and favor. It's meaning becomes so diverse that it 
is hard to see how the same word can be used for so many things, 
and often with no apparent connection. 
Our English word grace has followed the same pattern in a 
small way. You have a 30 day grace period on your insurance 
policy. This fits the idea of unmerited favor. They carry you 
for 30 days even though you don't deserve it, because you have 
not paid your premium. But what has this got to do with saying 
grace before you eat? You do not say unmerited favor, but you 
say thanks, which is your expression of favor to God. But if 
you say the swan has grace, you do not mean it has unmerited 
favor, or that it has thanks. You mean it has natural elegance, 
beauty of line and movement. It makes a favorable impression on 
us by its grace. We haven't begun to list all the meanings this 
word can have, but it is clear from these few examples, that the 
word has to be constantly redefined according to the context. 
A man living on the boarder of Minnesota and Wisconsin was 
puzzled for years as to which state he actually lived in. 
Finally he got around to having a special survey made. When the 
surveyor reported to him that he lived in Wisconsin, he tossed 
his hat in the air and shouted, "Hooray! No more of those cold 
Minnesota winters!" Of course, redefining where you are located 
does not change the weather, but to redefine a word can change 
the whole atmosphere of a passage. 
Grace is a warm and positive word usually, but it can be 
used in a cold and negative way. Charis means favor, and favor 
can be shown to those who do not deserve it, and thus, you have 
unmerited favor. Sound great doesn't it? But what if you were 
a student who worked hard for a scholarship and fulfilled all 
the requirements, but the gift went to student x, who didn't do 
a thing, but whose sister was the wife of the teacher, and so 
got it because of connections? Here is a form of unmerited 
favor which we call favoritism. It is unjust because it favors 
someone at the expense of another more deserving. Greek 
citizens had to swear an oath not to show this kind of charis 
for or against a fellow citizen. 
Charis, in this sense, is equivalent to the Hebrew idea of 
respect of persons. The Bible makes it clear that God is no 
respecter of persons. He shows no favoritism. That is why the
universalism of God's grace is stressed in the New Testament. 
Christ died for all men. This avoids any danger of reading the 
negative idea of favoritism into God's grace. 
The word is used this way in the New Testament, however. 
Paul, the apostle of positive grace, was a victim of negative 
grace. In Acts 24:27 we read, "Felix desiring to do the Jews a 
favor left Paul in prison." Here was favor, or grace, expressed 
for a selfish reason, and at the expense of another--namely 
Paul. In Acts 25:9 we see the same thing. Fetus wishing to do 
the Jews a favor took their side against Paul. This is the kind 
of grace that corrupts. The poet put it-- 
When rogues like these (a sparrow cries) 
To honors and employment rise, 
I court no favor, ask no place 
For such preferment is disgrace. 
The paradox is that there is a grace which is a disgrace, for it 
is the receiving of unmerited favor which is unjust, because it 
is at the expense of others. 
Now, as if this is not enough complexity, being able to 
mean either good or bad unmerited favor, we want to see that it 
can also mean merited favor. Most often Christians define grace 
as only unmerited favor, but this is putting a limit on the 
word which the New Testament does not do. It should not be 
surprising that grace can also mean merited favor. It is 
logical that favor is going to be shown toward those who merit 
it. No man merits salvation, which is the greatest aspect of 
God's grace, but many are pleasing to God by their obedience, 
and God responds to them in grace. 
To see this in operation, we need to go to the very first 
reference to grace in the New Testament. In Luke 1:30 the angel 
says, "Fear not, Mary, for you have found favor with God." 
Favor here is charis again. Mary was not sinless, but she was 
pure and lovely in character, and her life pleased God. She was 
chosen to be the mother of the Messiah because of her pure life. 
It is obvious she did not merit this honor in the sense that she 
was worthy, for no person could ever be worthy to give birth to 
the Son of God. On the other hand, she was not holy unfit to be 
Christ's mother, for she had a life pleasing to God, and the 
kind of life needed for His purpose. God did not favor her 
because she was less pure and righteous than others, but because 
of her exceptional purity and righteousness. She attracted 
God's favor by the beauty of her life. 
The clearest example of merited favor is in connection with 
Christ Himself. Luke 2:52 says, "Jesus increased in wisdom and 
stature, and in favor with God and man." 
Favor is charis again. You can see how meaningless it would be 
to define grace here as unmerited favor. This would mean that 
Jesus was not worthy of the favor of God, but God granted it 
anyway. And men, out of the goodness of their hearts, showed 
favor to Christ, even though he did not deserve it. This, of 
course, would be sheer nonsense. Grace here means merited 
favor. Jesus by the inherent beauty, goodness, 
and harmony of his life, attracted the favor of God and man. 
Jesus had a quality of character that fully merited all the
favor He received. 
This is an aspect of grace that we are seldom aware of. We 
tend to think of grace as a one way street: God's grace toward 
us. But favor works both ways in the New Testament. If God 
favors us and gives us blessings, we in turn favor God, and 
respond with gratitude to His graciousness. Our response is 
described by this same word--charis. We respond with grace. 
Listen to Paul in-- 
I Cor. 15:57, "But thanks be to God who gives us the victory..." 
II Cor. 2:14, "But thanks be to God, who in Christ always leads 
us in triumph." 
II Cor. 8:16, "But thank to God who puts the same earnest care 
for you into the 
heart of Titus." 
II Cor. 9:15, "Thanks be to God for His inexpressible gift." 
In each case, do you know what the Greek word is for 
thanks? It is charis, the same word used all through the New 
Testament for grace and favor. Grace be to God Paul says over 
and over again as he expresses his love and gratitude for God's 
grace. Here is grace which is merited. God merits our favor in 
every way, and therefore, all of man's grace to God is merited 
grace. This, of course, is where grace gets its connection with 
prayer before meals. We express our favor and thanks to God for 
His favor and goodness to us. Therefore, to multiply in grace 
means to grow in thankfulness, among other things. 
There are numerous passages where grace is the root idea in 
thanksgiving. The Greek word for thanksgiving is eucharist, and 
you see charis as the heart of it. The Lord's Supper is called 
the feast of the eucharist, or the feast of thanksgiving. It is 
our expression of grace for the great grace of God in giving us 
His Son. Grace at the very heart of the Gospel, as it is 
expressed in this poetic version of John 3:16. 
For God--the Lord of earth and heaven, so loved and longed 
to see forgiven, 
The world--in sin and pleasure mad, that He gave the 
greatest gift He had-- 
His only begotten Son--to take our place: That whosoever-- 
Oh what grace; 
Believeth--placing simple trust in Him--the righteous and 
the just, 
Should not parish lost in sin, But have eternal life--in 
Him. 
When we feel great joy because we have experienced God's 
grace or favor, we are experiencing a form of grace in our joy, 
for the Greek word for joy is chara. When we feel joyful, we are 
feeling graceful, which means full of favor. 
The word chara is used in the following Bible passages: Matt. 
2:10, "When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding 
great joy (chara)." 
Matt. 5:12, "Rejoice and be exceeding glad (chara): for great 
is your reward in heaven..." 
6Matt. 13:44 , "Again, the kingdom of heaven is like treasure 
hid in afield; when a man has found it, he hides, and for joy
(chara) thereof goes and sells all that he has, and buys that 
field."Matt. 18:13 describes the Lord's joy (chara) at finding 
the lost sheep. 
Matt. 25:21, 23, "His lord said unto him, Well done, good and 
faithful servant: you have been faithful over a few things, I 
will make the ruler over many things: enter into the joy (chara) 
of thy lord."We begin to see the relationship between joy and 
that which causes joy, namely, the favor and bounty which we 
receive from the Lord. 
In the realm of redemption, all of God's grace is favor 
toward those who not only do not merit it, but who deserve His 
wrath. In the gift of Christ, and salvation in Him, there is 
nothing but God's love to account for it. There is much of the 
grace of God, however, that flows out to men on the basis of 
their obedience. In other words, we can win the favor of God, 
and grow in grace by acts and attitudes which please Him. Peter 
uses charis to refer to a clear case of merited grace in I Peter 
2:19-20. You would never know it, however, for charis is hidden 
behind the English word of commendable. He writes, "For it is 
commendable (charis), if a man bears up under the pain of unjust 
suffering because he is conscious of God. But how is it to your 
credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? 
But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is 
commendable (charis), before God." 
Peter is saying, it is worthy of thanks, merit, and God's 
favor, if you, like Christ, suffer for righteousness sake. 
Grace does not lessen, but increases as we become more 
Christlike. God's grace flows forth, not only to sinners in 
abundance, but to the saints as well. Milton in Paradise Lost 
refers to God's grace as bountiful generosity to those who serve 
Him. 
Yet so much bounty is in God, such grace, 
That who advances His glory, not their own, 
Them He Himself to glory will advance. 
From this idea we go on to see that grace refers to the 
many gifts of God to His children. Grace is not only the 
generosity of the giver, and the gratitude of the receiver, it 
is the gift also. The Greek for gift is charisma. A gift is 
something with which you express favor, and so charis is the 
basic idea in the word gift. It could be translated gracious 
gift. In the well known Rom. 6:23, "The wages of sin is death, 
but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our 
Lord:" Gift is charisma, or gracious gift. Here we are in 
realm of redemption, and, as always, God's grace is totally 
unmerited. It is in contrast to the wages of sin. Wages imply 
merit or earned remuneration. Men merit, or deserve, death and 
damnation. They earn this by their life of sin. The gift of 
God, however, is not earned, but is a gift of unmerited favor. 
God's grace runs all through the New Testament under the word 
gift. 
God's giving does not end with salvation, however. His 
grace is sufficient for all of life, and He goes on giving 
gifts, as aspects of His grace. In II Cor. 1:11 Paul says,
"You also must help us by prayer, so that many will give thanks 
(eucharis) on our behalf for the blessing (charisma) granted us 
in answer to many prayers." All blessings are gifts of grace. 
Some are merited, and some are not. 
We know the Bible says much about gifts, but we have not 
been conscious of the fact that these are parts of grace. Men 
with special gifts of God are called charismatic. They are full 
of grace. As we multiply in grace, we grow in our capacity to 
be used of God, for we acquire, develop, and perfect more gifts 
as channels of His grace. In I Peter 4:10 Peter says, "As each 
has received a gift (charisma) employ it for one another as good 
stewards of God's varied grace." The whole of Christian service 
is an extension of God's grace. He gives it to us, and we pass 
it on. When we show favor we are being channels of God's grace. 
God's grace can be experienced through us. The giver, the 
receiver, the gift of power, love, joy, kindness, and 
innumerable other values are included in this marvelous word 
grace. 
Now we can understand why Paul begins everyone of his 
letters with grace, ends everyone of them with grace and fills 
them with references to it, and builds his theology around it. 
Paul was the great Apostle of grace, and of the 155 references 
to it in the N.T., 130 of them are from his pen. Now we can 
understand why Peter also makes a big issue of it, and why he 
wants to see grace multiplied in the lives of believers, and why 
he in 3:18 ends his letter by urging them to grow in grace and 
knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Grace is the 
source of all that is included in salvation and sanctification. 
Everything we are, and do, and will ever be, and do, depends on 
our growth in grace. Therefore, let our prayer be that which 
was left by the Duchess of Gordon among her papers when she 
died. "O Lord, give me grace to feel the need of Thy grace; 
give me grace to ask for Thy grace; and when in Thy grace Thou 
hast given me grace, give me grace to use Thy grace." 
This is a prayer very consistent with the theology of the 
N.T. for we read in Heb. 4:16 something quite similar. "Let us 
then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we 
may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of 
need." The point is, we need grace, not only as sinner who need 
to be saved, we need grace to be saints who are becoming what 
God wants us to be. It is cheap grace when we just trust in 
Christ to save us, and then do not call upon His grace to 
sanctify us and help us do his will. 
I like the KJV and the RSV of our text of II Pet. better, 
for they translate it, 
"Grace and peace be multiplied unto you.." Peter goes on to tell 
the Christians to add one virtue after another to their lives, 
but here he begins by saying don't just add grace, but let it be 
multiplied. The NIV means the same thing with its, "Grace and 
peace be yours in abundance..", but the word multiplied adds to 
the emphasis, and its absence subtracts from the sum that the 
word grace deserves. 
A six year old boy ran home from school, and immediately
went to the back of his house and grabbed his pet rabbit out of 
his cage. He shouted at it, 2 plus 2, and he kept it up until 
his mother came out and asked him what he was doing. He said, as 
he put the rabbit back in its cage with an attitude of contempt, 
"Our teacher told us today that rabbits multiply rapidly, but 
this dumb bunny can't even add." Their was obviously some 
misunderstanding here about multiplying. But there is no such 
misunderstanding about multiplying in grace in the N. T. 
No word in the N.T. carries more of the content of the 
Gospel than the word grace. Griffith Thomas said of it, 
"...perhaps the greatest word in the Bible because it is the 
word most truly expressive of God's character and attitude in 
relation to man." The Interpreter's Bible without reservation 
says, "Grace is the greatest word in the New Testament, and in 
the human vocabulary." Another author says, " Mastery of the 
Bible's teaching about Grace is the most important goal of the 
Christian Way of Life."To grow in grace, and to multiply grace, 
and have it in abundance is what the Christian life is all about 
according to the New Testament. To give God pleasure by our 
lives we need to be growing in grace, and this means giving 
favor, and not just receiving it. 
The value of studying all aspects of grace is that we do 
not limit it to just one of its many beautiful meanings, and 
thereby lose much of what God wants us to receive as well as 
give. Unmerited favor is true and vital, but it is only one part 
of grace. We are to seek God's grace by meriting it as well. The 
whole idea of reward is based on grace. We please God by 
obedience and we win His grace and thus, are rewarded. His grace 
also covers His favor in doing all sorts of things for us that 
we cannot do ourselves. In fact I discovered on the internet 
that one author who studies grace in depth came to the 
conclusion that the best definition of grace is, "God doing for 
us what we cannot do for ourselves!" 
Let me share a quote from this author who calls himself 
brother Dan. He posted this on the internet for millions of 
people to read. 
I just read the thesaurus on my word processor regarding 
the word"grace". Let me try to explain what I just learned. 
First, there were several meanings given for grace: Elegance, 
Kindness, Mercy, Holiness, Invocation, and Beautify. 
Elegance is not a definition of grace we usually consider 
when we are discussing God's grace theology. But, let us 
consider the synonyms for elegance just for what illumination 
God may give us: polish, refinement, attractiveness, beauty, 
charm, and comeliness. 
In line with this is the definition 'beautify', and its 
synonyms: adorn, decorate, embellish, enhance, ornament, crown, 
and deck. At first glance, these two definitions with their 
synonyms may not seem to be all that theologically significant 
in studying "grace".But, I believe that God would have us know 
that the true image of elegance and beauty are only found in His 
nature. He wants to polish and adorn us. We are His creation. He 
knows what we need most. 
God wants to refine, embellish, enhance and crown us with His
Eternal, Holy and Sovereign character. When we discovered that 
Jesus was calling us, we were so ugly. In light of God's nature, 
we, like Adam, must run and hide and cover our ugly nakedness. 
But, God picks us up and begins to bring out our true beauty, to 
manifest His charm and comeliness in our broken spirits. We 
indeed are ornamented with the fruit of His Holy Spirit, if we 
allow Him to do His work in us. 
John J. Clark wrote, "Cheap grace is grace without 
discipleship, the cross, Jesus Christ living and 
incarnate.Costly Grace, on the other hand, is the treasure 
hidden in a field. For the sake of it a man will gladly go and 
sell all that he 
has. It is a pearl of great price to buy which will cost us 
everything. It's the kingly rule of Christ, for whose sake a 
man will pluck out the eye which causes him to stumble. It is 
the call of Jesus at which a disciple leaves his nets and 
follows. It is grace which must be sought again and again, the 
gift which must be asked for, the door at which a man must 
knock. 
Such grace is costly because it calls us to follow, and it is 
grace because it calls us to follow Jesus Christ. Costly 
because it costs a man his life, it is grace because it gives a 
man the only true life. Costly because it condemns sin, and 
grace because it justifies 
the sinner. Above all, costly because it cost God the life of 
His 
Son: "You have been bought with a price" and what has cost God 
so 
much can't be cheap for us. It is grace because God did not 
reckon 
his Son too dear a price to pay for our life, but delivered him 
up 
for us. It is costly because it compels a man to submit to the 
yoke 
of Christ, but it is grace because "My yoke is easy and my 
burden light". 
He is illustrating the paradox of grace. It is so free, 
from one perspective, but so costly from another. It is a most 
multi-faseted virtue, with multiple meanings, which we are to be 
busy multiplying in our lives. So let us make the prayer of the 
Duchess of Gordon, that I read earlier, be our prayer. "O Lord, 
give me grace to feel the need of Thy grace; give me grace to 
ask for Thy grace; and when in Thy grace Thou hast given me 
grace, give me grace to use Thy grace." 
CHAPTER5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based on 
Heb.10:32-34 
Few men alive on this planet have suffered more than did James B. 
Stockdale. He was a prisoner of war for 2,714 days in Vietnam. 
On one occasion the North Vietnamese handcuffed his hands behind 
his back, locked his legs in heavy irons, and dragged him from
his cell to the unshaded courtyard. They left him lay there for 
3 days. The sun burned him, and the guards beat him so he could 
not sleep. Men died with such torture, but Stockdale survived, 
and the reason he did was because of the music of sympathy. That 
is, he got messages from the prisoners that encouraged him to 
fight on. He would hear a towel snapping in their special 
prisoner code, and it would say God bless you Jim Stockdale. The 
sounds of a snapping towel in the midst of torture does not seem 
like much to us, but for him it was a symphony of sympathy that 
helped keep him alive. 
The prisoners of war were isolated, for this is, in itself, 
a form of torture. Loneliness can be harder to bear than 
physical pain. The captives, however, developed an elaborate 
system of communication by which they could send messages from 
cell to cell, and even from building to building. They used 
their fingers, fists, elbows, and tin cups, and then they 
developed a sophisticated tapping routine. Dr. Julius Segal in 
his book, Winning Life's Toughest Battles, studied these men who 
survived, and records their amazing efforts to develop their 
togetherness in a world of isolation. 
The prisoner assigned to sweep the prison compound used the 
broom movements to talk to the rest of the prisoners. When 
walking past another cell the way they would drag their sandals 
would send a message. Some sent messages by the way they blew 
their noses, and others by belching. One feigned sleep for a 
couple of hours each day, and during the siesta period he would, 
by his snoring, send reports to everyone in his cell block. 
Nave Lieutenant Commander John S. McCain III, who spent much 
of his five and a half years in solitary confinement, concluded, 
"The most important thing for survival as a POW was communication 
with someone, even if it was only a wave or a wink, or a tap on a 
wall, or to have a guy put his thumb up. It made all the 
difference." POW Everett Alvarez said, "They were acts of 
self-healing. We really got to know each other through our 
silent conversations across the brick walls. Eventually, we 
learned all about each other's childhood, back ground, 
experiences, wives and children, hopes and ambitions." Our 
hostages in Iran had the same kind of experience. Some of them 
never met until after they were liberated, yet they felt they 
knew each other because of the support system they developed. 
Katherine Koob said, "Just knowing that someone in the next cell 
cared that I existed helped me go on." 
All of this confirms the New Testament message on the 
importance of sympathy. 
It is a key weapon in surviving and overcoming the unjust 
suffering of this world. The early Christians had to suffer so 
much persecution, but that which sustained them and kept the 
church alive was the symphony of sympathy. The Greek word in 
Heb. 10:34 is sumpatheo, which means sympathy, or, to suffer with 
another. Another form of the word is sumpathes, and this is the 
word used by Peter in I Pet. 3:8 where he writes, "Finally, all 
of you, live in harmony with one another, be sympathetic, love as 
brothers, be compassionate and humble." These two Greek words 
represent, not just a solo instrument, or even a duet, but a
whole orchestra of instruments that produce a symphony of 
sympathy, that brings harmony into a world of discord. 
Just a partial list of the words that convey some aspects of 
sympathy will reveal how widespread this virtue is. Synonyms of 
sympathy are, compassion, condolence, unity, harmony, alliance, 
concord, tenderness, pity, friendliness, kindness, 
fellow-feeling, consolation, brotherly-love, and 
warm-heartedness. In other words, the study of sympathy connects 
us with practically every relationship virtue of the Christian 
life. 
The paradox is, this is a form of suffering that is 
self-imposed. It is a voluntary choice to enter into the 
sufferings of another, and feel some of the same pain they do. 
Here is suffering that could easily be avoided by simply not 
caring. The opposite of sympathy is antipathy. This is the 
feeling that you have when you are not drawn to the sufferer to 
stand along side and feel with him. But, rather, when you are 
repulsed by the sufferer, and withdraw in hostility to let them 
stand alone. In between these two extremes of sympathy and 
antipathy is the neutral apathy, where you are neither pulled 
toward nor pushed from the sufferer, but are indifferent, with no 
feelings one way or the other. 
Elinor Wylie, the poet and novelist, was deeply distressed, 
and she woke Katherine Porter at four A.M., and when she came to 
the door Miss Wylie said to her, "I have stood the crossness of 
this world as long as I can, and I am going to kill myself. You 
are the only person in the world to whom I wish to say good-bye." 
Miss Porter looked her dispassionately in the eye and responded, 
"Elinor, it was good of you to think of me. Good-bye." Here was 
a woman seeking sympathy, but she got apathy, with a tinge of 
antipathy. The fact is, just as sympathy is the key to survival 
in life's sufferings, so apathy and antipathy are the weapons 
Satan uses to bring people to defeat and despair. 
People need a song of some sort in their life to keep on 
going, and the symphony of sympathy provides the music for 
living. It is no second rate virtue. It is agape love in 
action. We want to focus our attention on this paradoxical form 
of suffering that is a key factor in the alleviation of 
suffering. The first thing we want to look at is- 
I. THE PAIN OF SYMPATHY. 
It costs to care, and there are pains to pay and hurts 
involved in helping others bear their burdens. Our text 
describes Christians who stand along side other Christians who 
were being insulted and persecuted. They sympathized with 
Christians who were imprisoned, and when you stand along side of 
people who are being rejected, you too will be rejected, and they 
were, and they suffered the loss of their property because they 
identified with those who suffered. 
Someone defined sympathy as, "Your pain in my heart." 
William Stidger tells of seeing a group of boys and girls in his 
home town gathered around a friend on the ground. He walked over
and saw this young boy doubled over and weeping with pain. He 
asked one of the children what the problem was, and the girl 
replied, "We've all got a pain in Jimmy's stomach." This was 
sympathy, and she was feeling the pain right along with the 
suffering friend. Benjamin Franklin had sympathy for the Indians 
in a day when it was costly to care for Indians. On Dec. 14, 
1763, 57 white vigilantes raided a peaceable settlement of one of 
the Indian tribes and killed 6 of the 20 Indians there. 
Two weeks later over 200 vigilantes raided the jail where 
the other 14 were being kept in protective custody, and they 
broke the door down and killed the Indians. Franklin was 
outraged, and called for the punishment of these white savages. 
He raised a militia of almost 1000 men, and rode out to prevent 
their next strike. He succeeded in saving 140 Indian lives. But 
his sympathy for the Indians cost him dearly, and he was defeated 
that year for reelection to the Colonial Assembly of 
Pennsylvania. 
Sympathy is a choice as to what you will suffer for, and 
everybody suffers for something. Will you suffer for the 
prejudice and bigotry of antipathy by adding to the suffering of 
others? Will you suffer the judgment of apathy by having no 
feelings toward the suffering of others? Or will you suffer the 
pain of sympathy, because you choose to identify with, and stand 
along side of, others as they suffer? The first two are 
Satan-like and fallen humanity-like. Only the third choice is 
Christ-like. Jesus was tempted in all points like as we are, but 
without sin. He entered into flesh and lived on our level, and 
He knows by experience what the battle of life is all about. 
Heb. 4:15 says, "For we do not have a high priest who is unable 
to sympathize with our weaknesses..." He can stand along side 
and suffer with us, because He has been there, and He knows what 
it is to be weak and to suffer. It was painful for Him, but 
profitable for us that Jesus entered the limitations of the 
flesh, for we now have a Sympathizing Savior. 
This is where we see the value of much suffering in this 
fallen world. All suffering becomes good suffering that leads 
you to sympathize with others in their suffering. Allen Gregg of 
the Rockefeller Fund said, he hated to see a medical student get 
his MD degree before he had been a patient in the hospital. "I'd 
like to put every intern through an appendectomy at least. Not 
for the surgical experience, but to learn how the average patient 
is treated." So also, every lawyer who has not been through a 
court case has little notion of what his clients suffer. It is 
not enough to walk a mile in someone else's moccasin says Sidney 
Harris. He says, "They have to pinch enough, long enough for the 
blister to be remembered when the shoe is on the other foot." In 
other words, all caregivers need to experience suffering to some 
degree to be able to enter into the pain of sympathy. This is 
vital to the helping of others bear their burdens. 
We do not know why the Good Samaritan was so sympathetic 
toward a stranger who was beaten and robbed. Possibly he had 
been there himself, and had been attacked on a previous journey. 
Whatever the case, he was the hero of the story because he was 
willing to voluntarily suffer the pains of sympathy. The priest
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes
Bible paradoxes

More Related Content

Bible paradoxes

  • 1. BIBLE PARADOXES By Glenn Pease CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 CHAPTER 2 THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Esther 2:19-3:6 CHAPTER 3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5 CHAPTER 4 MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET 1 CHAPTER 5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based onHeb.10:32-34 CHAPTER 6 THE FOLLY OF THE WISE Based on I King 11:1-13 CHAPTER 7 THE POWER OF NEGATIVE THINKING Isa. 1:1-17 CHAPTER 8 GOOD OUT OF EVIL PART II Based on James 1:12 CHAPTER 9 THE PERPLEXITY OF PLEASURE Based on Eccles.2:1 CHAPTER10 THE PLEASURE OF PERSPECTIVE Based on Psalm 84 CHAPTER11 THE PLEASURE OF PAIN BASED ON PSALM 84:6 CHAPTER12 GUILT CAN BE GOOD BASED ON PSALM 32:1-5 INTRODUCTION Paradox and perspective Para means contrary and doxa means opinion, and so a paradox deals with contrary opinions or ideas which are seemingly so opposite they cannot both be true, but which are, in fact, both true. They sound contradictory but the really compliment each other. In paradox two opposite and contradictory ideas can be shown to be two parts of a greater whole larger than either of them alone. Two men can be looking at a shield from each side of it, and one says it is gold and the other that it is a silver shield. Both know they are right for they are looking at it right in front of their face. They can argue for ever and never convince the other to change their view. They can only resolve their conflict by going to the other side and seeing that a shield can be gold on one side and silver on the other. Both were right, but both were wrong too, because they only saw part of the whole truth about the shield. The false assumption is many conflicts is that if one side is certain they are right, any contrary idea must be wrong. This is false because it is possible for both to be right even though they seem contradictory. Paradox says that opposite perspectives can both be right. For example, when Durand, the Frenchman, visited London he saw such places as Waterloo station and Trafalgar square. He said to his wife, “These English are really odd, they seem to have a mania for naming places after defeats.” From his perspective as a Frenchman these
  • 2. were defeats, but Waterloo and Trafalgar were great victories for the English. He failed to recognize that a battle can be both a defeat and a victory, just as every sports event is both a win and a loss, for their are always two sides. We need to recognize the same thing can be seen from more than one perspective. Take a snowstorm as an illustration. A family of 4 can see it from 4 different perspectives. The mother sees the snow as a source of beauty as she looks out of her picture window and sees her evergreens beautified with the white fluffy stuff. The father sees it as a nuisance as he has to shovel the drive way and be late for work because of the traffic mess. The son sees it as a source of income because the neighbors will pay him to shovel for them. The little girl sees it as a source of fun, for now she can use the new sled she got for her birthday. What could be more futile than a debate to determine which of them is right? Three of them find pleasure, and only one finds pain in the snow, and so can the issue be decided by majority vote? This would not change the fact that the father still has to suffer while the other three enjoy it. We need to face it. It is a paradox. A snowfall is both pleasure and pain. It is both beautiful and a nuisance. You cannot get everybody on the same side, for their are two sides, and both are real and legitimate. When Mark Twain visited Whistler in his studio he started to touch a certain painting. Whistler cried out, “Don’t touch that, it isn’t dry yet!” “I don’t mind,” said Twain, “I have gloves on.” They were on two different channels, and Mark Twain missed the point completely. He was not being sensitive to the perspective of Whistler who was concerned about his painting being ruined, and not about getting paint on Twain’s finger. Paul in Phil. 2:4 wrote, “Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others.” In other words, recognize their are other perspectives than your own, and you need to be sensitive to them or you will be a self-centered person. Life is full of paradoxes. If you look at a stick in the water you see it as crooked. You know it is a straight stick, and yet it is bent to your vision. You are certain it is straight and yet you cannot see it as straight in the water. No matter how clearly you have it explained why it looks bent you cannot see it straight. Mentally you know it is, but visually you experience it as not straight. And so you have a paradox of a straight stick that is crooked because both are real at the same time. This reality can help a person escape prejudice. He may have been taught that other races are inferior to his, and so he cannot help but see them that way. But if he recognizes the reality of paradox, he can learn that what he sees is like that crooked stick. It is an illusion created by circumstance, but it is not objective reality. Other races are proven to be equal with his, and so he may have feeling left from his training that makes him see others in a bent way, but he can also know that what he feels is not the truth, and thereby overcome the subjective feeling and chose to act in accord with objective truth. We have to fight the tendency constantly of seeing reality only from our perspective. The poet gives an example. When offspring roll upon the floor, And kick their heels in rage,
  • 3. They either need a spanking or Their going through a stage, Depending, with distinction fine, On whether they are yours or mine. We tend to see through eyes which favor ourselves at the expense of others. Identical behavior on our part is seen as a virtue, which in others we see as a vice. We are thrifty, but they are stingy. We have firm convictions, but they are stubborn as a mule. We are cautious, but they are slow pokes. We are courteous, but the other guy is a brown noser. We are zealous, but the other guy is a fanatic. We see ourselves as virtuous in doing the same things that other are doing, but which we call vices. Men are forever debating whether we should be right wing or left wing, when it should be conspicuous to everyone that God never made a bird yet with only one wing. They would never get off the ground if he did. It does not have to be one or the other, but we need the whole bird, and the perspectives of both the conservative mind and the liberal mind to get the whole picture. Anyone who is always just one or the other is narrow minded and does not deal with the real world. Dr. Billy Graham said that he was a conservative theologically, and a liberal socially. Can you be both a liberal and a conservative? Why not? It is no more unreasonable than the fact that a day is made up of both daytime and nighttime. They are opposites, but they are both real and a part of the whole. Man is not a saint or a sinner, but a saint and a sinner. He is both even though they are opposites. If you are going to deal with the whole man you need to see the reality of this paradox. Pascal saw it and said, “Man is the glory and scum of the universe.” 1. THE PARADOX OF PLEASURE Based on Esther 2:1-4 Alexander Selkirk was one of those men who always had to learn the hard way. The records of his church in Scotland show that he was disciplined several times for causing trouble in the church. In May of 1703 he said good-bye to all that, and at age 27 went off to sea. He tried to run things on the ship as he did church, and he got into a furious argument with the Captain. They were anchored off a small island four hundred miles from Chile. Alexander got so mad he packed up his possessions and went ashore. "You don't dare sail without me," he shouted to the Captain. The Captain was not impressed with his conviction, and gave the order to sail. Poor Alexander could not believe it. He thought he was indispensable. He was waiting out up to his arm pits pleading for the Captain to forgive him, but the Captain was as stubborn as he was, and he sailed away, never to return. Fortunately for Alexander the island had been inhabited by Jon Fernandez two centuries earlier, and he had left some goats
  • 4. on the island. These gave him food and skins. For four years and four months he depended on them for survival. When he was finally rescued, he could hardly remember how to talk. When he got back to England he was a sensation, and several books were written about him. The most famous was fiction, but it used his experience as a model. The book was Robinson Crusoe. That was a tough way to learn to keep his mouth shut. It is so hard not to do something, or say something foolish or destructive when you are angry. Even great men often have to learn the hard way that loss of temper can be costly. Xerxes was the ruler of the Persian Empire, he could have anything he pleased, but he lost his wife, whom he truly treasured, because of his anger. Xerxes had a reputation for losing his temper when he could not have his own way. He once wanted to cross the waters of the hellespont, but it was so rough his troops could not build a bridge. He got so angry he took chains to the water, and he began to flog it. Like most temper tantrums, it was not very effective. It is so hard to play God when nature and others will not cooperate. The water would not stop for him, and his wife would not start for him, and he blew his stack. And why shouldn't he? He was the most powerful man in the world, and why should he not get angry for the same reason the rest of us get angry? Why do we get angry? Primarily because something or someone has spoiled our pleasure. We are not different from King Xerxes. He had his heart set on seeing all his noble leaders gape in envy as he revealed the beauty of his wife to them. Half the joy of possessing something is in showing it to those who don't. Vashti had the audacity to rob him of this pleasure. He blazed with anger within, because she would not grant his whim. If you examine your own life, you will discover that most of your anger is based on the hindrance of your pleasure. You have plans, and somebody does not cooperate, and the pleasure you hope for is lost, and you are angry. Children cry most often because they can't have their own way. Somebody is always hindering them from having their pleasure. They want to play with the new camera you just bought, and you insist it is not a toy, and there heart is broken. They want to run barefoot in a junk infested lot, and you deny them of their pleasure. On and on goes the list of pleasures a child desires that are constantly being hindered by parents, who get no pleasure out of picking up pieces of a two hundred dollar camera, and rushing to the emergency room for stitches. What we see then, is that from the beginning, life is a battle to see whose pleasures are met, and whose are denied. Striving for pleasure is a far more powerful factor in all of our lives then we realize. Because we do not examine our lives from the perspective of the pleasure motive, we look on the events of the book of Esther with some degree of shock. It is scandalous that every beautiful virgin in the empire was to be made available to the king, to meet his demand for pleasure. Keep in mind, he is the most powerful man in the world. The whole book revolves around his pleasure. What pleases him determines the life or death of every human being of
  • 5. his time. If he pleases, whole nations are destroyed, and if he pleases, they are spared. God's providence had to work through His pleasure motive. The first two chapters reveal that he was dominated by sensual pleasure. His party life and sex life established the environment in which the entire story takes place. Xerxes is no different than the rulers of that part of the world today. A reporter who traveled to all of the oil rich Arab countries, and interviewed all of the kings and sheiks, reported that they lived just like Xerxes did. Wine, women, and song, and every pleasure man is capable of was a way of life. Xerxes is said to have offered a reward for anyone who could invent a new pleasure. This is the challenge today for those who have so much money they cannot think of any new way of spending it. The book of Esther is not dealing with something old and irrelevant, but rather, with a subject so real and relevant to all of us, but one that we often fail to think about seriously, the subject of pleasure. Before we get all bent out of shape about Xerxes, and his lust for pleasure, lets examine our own lives. When we do, we will discover that we are not so different from this sensual king. The main difference is that we do not have the power and wealth to command the pleasures he had, but the difference is really only one of degree. We too enjoy parties with good things to eat and drink, and we enjoy beautiful furniture and drapes. We enjoy nice clothes, and I have seldom heard of a Christian who does not enjoy sexual pleasure. The more we examine the Christian life, the more we begin to realize we are very pleasure oriented. We don't feel the lest guilt for enjoying the pleasure of music, fellowship, an all that being a part of the body of Christ involves. Why should we? Jesus enjoyed the social pleasures of His time. He enjoyed the party, the wedding, the feasting, the singing, the fun of fishing, and fellowship. So what we have is, the paradox of pleasure. It is both something we are to crave and seek and enjoy, and yet it is something that can be so dangerous that it can quickly lead us to fall, and be out of the will of God. Pleasure is both a virtue and a vice. The search for pleasure is the primary motivation behind the evil of man. Satan appealed to the pleasure nature to get man to fall. He said, taste the forbidden fruit and you will have the pleasure of being like God, and they jumped at the chance. But good is also motivated by pleasure. The Gospel is an appeal to the pleasure nature as well, for Jesus says, "Come unto me all ye who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." Jesus offers men the joy of eternal life, and the pleasure of abundant life. There is not available anywhere in the world a hope for greater pleasure than what Jesus offers those who put their faith in Him. What this means is we cannot afford to be reacting as Christians so often do. They look at Xerxes, and his six months
  • 6. banquet of gluttony, drunkenness, and perpetual beautiful virgins for his lust, and they say this is disgusting. Then they think their mission in life should be to prevent as much pleasure as possible. This over reaction to evil pleasure in the world has caused Christians to totally misrepresent Christ, and pervert the Gospel so that it loses its appeal to most everyone but sadist who delight in pain. History is full of the folly of Christian ascetics, who thought they pleased God by pain rather pleasure. They wore hair shirts to itch and be miserable. They flogged themselves thinking that suffering was the key to sanctification. Fun and pleasure were so related to sin that misery and boredom were exalted to the level of virtues. To avoid this reaction to worldly pleasure we need to see where the Bible stands on the issue of pleasure. The first thing we see, as we examine God's Word, is that God is the Creator of pleasure. He made the world and man, and said it is very good, and He took pleasure in all that He had made. He made man with a nervous system capable of enjoying much pleasure of sight, sound, taste, smell, and feeling. He designed man to be a pleasure loving creature. Every pleasure we are capable of is a cause to thank God, for it is by His will we have that capacity. David acknowledges God as the source of all of life's pleasures in Psa. 36:7-8. "How precious is thy steadfast love, O God! The children of men take refuge in the shadow of thy wings. They feast on the abundance of thy house, and thou givest them drink from the rivers of thy pleasures." God gives rivers of pleasure, even in time, before the believers dwell by the River of Life, where all pain will be forever gone, and life will be endless pleasure, for, "At God's right hand our pleasures for ever more." (Psa. 16:11). God delights in the pleasures of His servants says Psa. 35:27. God is a personality who enjoys great pleasure Himself. Psa. 149:4 says, "For the Lord takes pleasure in His people." As we, as parents and grandparents, take pleasure in seeing our children grow and develop, so God delights in His children. God wanted the temple rebuilt in Jerusalem, and He said to the people in Hag. 1:8, "Go up to the hills and bring wood and build the house, that I may take pleasure in it and that I may appear in my glory, says the Lord." God is no where revealed as a vast cosmic machine. God is a person who feels, and His goal is to accomplish what is good and pleasurable. Phil. 2:13 says, "For God is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure." Jesus said in Luke 12:32, "Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father's good pleasure to give you the kingdom." Let's get it straight in our minds, God is not a sadist who loves pain and delights in suffering . The goal of God is pleasure for Himself, and for all His people. He makes it clear in Ezek. 18:23. "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, says the Lord God, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?"
  • 7. God's goal for every man is a goal of pleasure. Hell is pain and heaven is pleasure, and heaven is always God's goal. I looked in a dictionary of synonyms and antonyms, and found this list of the opposites of pleasure. Listen to them, and see if you catch the flow of heaven or hell. Displeasure Evil Desolation Sorrow Pain Anxiety Woe Hurt Burden Grief Wound Adversity Suffering Affliction Trouble Vexation Anguish Unhappiness Worry Despair Tribulation Sickness Misfortune This is not an ideal shopping list for Christmas, or any other day in life. In fact, the only place you can get that list fulfilled perfectly is in hell. Not a one of them will be a part of heaven. So we are stuck with an enormous paradox. The entire plan of God, and the goal of Christians, is pleasure. Yet, that seems to be the major problem of sinful man, and the primary method of worldliness. Even Plato could see it and say, "Pleasure is the greatest incentive to evil." It is the pleasure principle that leads men into every form of lust, and which takes them lower than the beast. Yet, it is the pleasure principle that leads men to the highest levels of godliness, and enables them to fulfill the purpose of God. The book of Esther is a perfect illustration of the paradox of pleasure. It begins with a feast that is dedicated to worldly pleasure, and gratification of the senses. It ends with the proclamation of a perpetual feast that will also gratify the senses, but will be in thanksgiving for the providence of God. The pleasure of the people of God at a banquet is no less enjoyable than that of the sensuous secularist. Xerxes had more of every sensual pleasure, but the fact is, he did not enjoy eating, sexuality, and other aesthetic pleasures anymore than the Jews did, or than Christians do today. How then can we distinguish between pleasures which are displeasing to God, and those which please Him? How can we unravel this paradox so we know which side we are on? How can we know if we are at Xerxes's banquet, or Esther's banquet? The first thing we need to do is to recognize pleasure is not evil. It is good, and from God. Then we need to recognize that all good can be perverted and abused. That is what evil is-it is good used in a way that God never intended. C. S. Lewis in The Screwtape Letters has the Sr. devil writing to the Jr. devil explaining the work of temptation. He writes, "Never forget that when we are dealing with any pleasure in its healthy and normal and satisfying form, we are, in a sense, on the Enemy's ground. I know we have won many a soul through pleasure. All the same, it is His invention, not ours. He made the pleasures; all our research so far has not enabled us to produce one. All we can do is to encourage the humans to take the pleasures which
  • 8. our Enemy has produced, at times, or in ways, or in degrees, which he has forbidden." The tempters task is to get men to think, if a little is good, a lot must be better. If he can get men to use God's pleasures to excess, he can get them hooked, so that the very gifts of God become idols, that lead them astray from God. Such is the subtle plan of the deceiver, and it is a very effective plan. We live in a culture where pleasure is no longer a gift from God, for it has become god. Norman Lobsenz has written a book titled, Is Anybody Happy. It is a study of the American search for pleasure. The goal of life for Americans is a good time. Our national Mecca is Disney World. Pleasure is the alpha and omega of life. The national heroes are no longer the titans of industry, or the somber statesman, or solitary inventors. Now it is the movie star, the sports hero, and international playboy, who have taken their place. The important thing now is to have fun. Lobsenz writes, "Advertisers, never slow to sense a trend, have leaped on the bandwagon, and there is now hardly an artifact or an activity that is not intimately connected with spine-tingling happiness. Brushing your teeth with a certain tooth paste, of course-is fun. Cutting the grass-with a certain lawnmower-is exciting. Do you want to know the real joy of good living? Drink a certain beer....soap flakes give glamorous suds. It is fun to paint your house with so and so's paint. Eye glasses are bewitching. Light bulbs are romantic. Building materials are festive. Soft drinks are sociable. Kitchen appliances are smart. Anything you buy that is made of shining aluminum will mirror your laughter. Even paying the bills for these items is a pleasure if you have an account at a certain bank." Lobsenz says he expects someday to see a billboard with the bony finger of Uncle Sam pointing at him asking, "Have you had your fun today?" We are under a new morality-the fun morality. It says, if it feels good do it. It is not new of course, for Xerxes was a pro at it 2,500 years ago. Instead of feeling ashamed for having too much pleasure, from now on we are to feel guilty if we do not have enough. People are now going to psychiatrist and asking, "What is wrong with me? I can't let go and have enough fun." People feel so obligated to have fun they attack it with all the energy they use to put into achievement. This pursuit of pleasure often ends in broken marriages, broken lives, and death, especially for those who find their pleasure in alcohol and other drugs. Is the Christian approach to try and be a kill joy, and oppose pleasure, and call people back to a work ethic, where go go go is the battle cry? Not at all! The Christian is for pleasure too, for that is God's plan for man. The Christian simply needs to point out the folly of making pleasure an idol. It is not the end of life, but a means to a higher end. "Man's chief end is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever." We are into pleasure too, but because it is not an end in itself,
  • 9. but a means to the end of enjoying God, we have an objective standard by which we measure the value of all pleasures. In other words, we count the cost. Satan does not want man to count the cost, for his whole strategy is to get men to choose pleasure at any cost. The cost factor is what enables the Christian to have a guide to legitimate pleasure. You can tell if you are being excessive in your pursuit of pleasure by what it is costing you. Any pleasure that costs you your growth in Christian fruitfulness is folly, and excessive pleasure. Jesus made this clear in the parable of the sower, where the seed that fell among the thorns did not lead to fruitfulness. He tells us in Luke 8:14, "There are those who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of life, and their fruit does not mature." They pay too much for their pleasure. They lose the highest pleasure of life-the pleasure of pleasing God, and being what He wills, for the sake of pleasure that will pass away. They trade in their diamonds for marbles. The Gospel is not a call to forsake pleasure, but it is a call to rise to higher pleasure, and to enjoy that which lasts forever. The motive for all self-denial, which keeps the Christian from immoral pleasure, is the hope for enduring pleasure. Listen to Paul giving counsel to the rich Christians who could so easily indulge themselves in excessive pleasures. He writes in I Tim. 6:17-19, "As for the rich in this world, charge them not to be haughty, nor to set their hope on uncertain riches but on God who richly furnishes us with everything to enjoy. They are to do good, to be rich in good deeds, liberal and generous, thus laying up for themselves a good foundation for the future. So that they may take hold of the life which is life indeed." Paul is saying, you only go around once in this life, so do it with gusto. But for Paul, that does not mean to drink beer, it means to enjoy the higher and lasting pleasures of doing the will of God, which guarantees we will have abundant life now, and an eternal life of pleasure on the highest level. The Christian is one who evaluates pleasure, and does not just grab at it indiscriminately. He asks, does this enlarge, or does it enrich my Christian life, and my attitude of gratitude to God? The Christian is on the greatest pleasure trip possible. If we could not assert that the plan of Christ leads to the greatest pleasure for the greatest number, we would be saying that there is a better way. The fact is, no one even pretends to offer a better way than Christ. We can say with the advertisers who are confident of their products, "If you can find a better way than Christ-take it." When referring to God, it is an absolute truth that Father knows best. He forbids only those forms of pleasure which, in the long run, lead to pain greater than the pleasure. God never forbids any pleasure which will last, and be a part of your growth toward the goal of becoming like Him. He only forbids that which costs too much. Forbidden pleasure is a rip off. It costs you the favor of God, and usually has a kick back
  • 10. of pain that far exceeds the pleasure. How often people take drugs to feel good, only to end up in jail or worse, and feeling rotten, and with problems that are now worse than before. Biblical morality is a fight back morality. It is a demand that you don't be a sucker, and get ripped off by cheap imitations. Jesus Christ, and He alone, offers the real thing-life abundant and life eternal. He paid and enormous cost, and endured the pains of hell, that we might enjoy the pleasures of heaven. Whatever price we need to pay to be loyal to Him is small cost for so great a gift. The martyr who suffers death rather than deny Christ, does so for pleasure. He knows the cost is nothing compared to what he will enjoy at Christ's right hand. That is why one of my favorite preachers, F. W. Boreham, said, "The tragedy of the age is not that people are getting too much pleasure, but that they are not getting enough." Life Xerxes, the world is pleasure mad, but in all of their sensual self-indulgence, they do not find the pleasure of peace and meaning, or eternal hope. They pursue pleasure as a god, and are left empty. The Christian pursues the will of God, and is filled with pleasure. The world grabs the rose and clutches and thus must bare the pains of the thorn. The Christian does not need to grasp it, but can enjoy it, and not cling, for he knows he cannot lose the rose even if it dies, for he is a child of the rose's Creator, and knows the rose will be his forever. Honey is bought to dear by those who risk the bees stingers. The Christian is one who is wise in his pleasure seeking. He enjoys all God has given us to enjoy, but avoiding excess and the forbidden, knowing this leads to the greatest pleasure. Contrary to the view that Christianity is opposed to the search for pleasure, the opposite is the case. We have found the very thing man is searching for, the way to the highest most lasting pleasure of which man is capable. With this highest goal of salvation settled, the Christian then can enjoy the lesser pleasures of life more completely, for they are not so essential that he has to cling to them for meaning. The highest and permanent being assured in Christ, he can relax, and enjoy the passing without the risk of idolatry. To sum it up, the paradox of pleasure is that the pursuit of pleasure can lead you to the pit of hell, or to the pinnacle of heaven. It is life's most dangerous or delightful path to travel. The ecstasy of victory, or the agony of defeat, awaits all who travel it. Which you find depends on whether Xerxes is your example, or Jesus Christ. You either do what pleases you with no higher loyalty than your own pleasure, or you do what pleases God, with His will as your motive for rejecting or accepting pleasure. Those who choose the way of Christ, saying, not my will but thine be done, will enjoy at God's right hand pleasure for ever more.
  • 11. 2. THE PARADOX OF PATRIOTISM Based on Esther 2:19-3:6 Newscaster Paul Harvey, some years ago, told his radio listeners this remarkable story from World War II. From the Island of Guam one of our mighty B-29 bombers took off for Kokura, Japan. It was carrying deadly cargo as it circled high above the city. A cloud covered the city, so the plane kept circling for half an hour, and then for three quarters of an hour, and finally after 55 minutes the gas supply was reaching the danger zone. The plane had to leave its primary target, and go to a secondary target where the sky was clear. Then the command could be given, "Bombs away!" Only weeks later did the military receive information that chilled many a heart. Thousands of allied prisoners of war, the largest concentration of Americans in enemy hands, had been moved to Kokura a week before the bombing mission. Had it not been for that cloud, thousands of Americans now alive would have been killed, for that B-29 was carrying the world's second atomic bomb. It was taken instead to the secondary target- Nagasaki. The direction history takes, so often is determined by such minor things. Small things play a big role in life. The illustrations of this are numerous, yet it is a truth that demands balance, or it leads to folly. God's providence is constantly working through little things, but not every little thing is of significance. To think so can lead to becoming neurotic, for you will search for meaning in every trivial event of life. The danger of this is illustrated by the little girl who came running into her house sobbing. She threw herself into her mothers arms, and cried out, "God doesn't love me anymore!" The mother was shocked and puzzled at what could produce such a crisis. "Why do you say that?" she asked, assuring her that God does love her. "No mother!" she wailed. "I know He doesn't love me. I tried Him with a daisy." In case you have never tried that less than fool proof method of predicting love, by pulling off petals to, "He loves me, he loves me not," let me recommend that you never start, if you are going to take it seriously. The fact is, there are little things that are just little things. They are minor and insignificant. They are not subtle and hidden methods by which great things are accomplished. I don't think it is a healthy exercise to go through life trying to figure out if God is trying to say something through every minor event. When God does work through such events, it is only known as we look back and see the minor event as a link in the chain that leads to the fulfillment of His purpose. This is what we see in the life of Mordecai. As a cloud saved many Americans, so a conversation saved many Jews. Mordecai over heard a couple of the kings servants plotting to assassinate him. This was very common in the ancient world, because the only way to get rid of an absolute monarch was by assassination. They never quit, and could not be voted out, and
  • 12. so violence was the only method open for change. Many of kings of Persians were assassinated, including Xerxes. He was saved by Mordecai, but fourteen years later one of his servants succeeded in his plot to kill him. Assassination was common even in Israel. In I Kings 15 we read of how Baasha conspired to kill Nadab, the king of Israel, after he had reigned only two years. Baasha became king then, and reigned 24 years, but he was also a evil king, so nothing was gained by the people in this politics of violence. His son Elah became king, and 2 years later his servant Zimri assassinated him, and became king. Once you killed the king, you had to kill the whole family, and many of his friends, so the violence of the ancient world was terrible. There are other gruesome assassinations in the Old Testament. I point this out so that we can see clearly the nature of Mordecai's political decision, when he chose to become an informer, and revealed the conspiracy against Xerxes We see in Mordecai's experience good reason for why political decisions are so paradoxical, and why it is that politicians are often so variable. We see it in Mordecai's patriotism. In the last paragraph of chapter 2 we see Mordecai as a defender of the state, and then in the first paragraph of chapter 3 we him as a defier of the state. He first saved Xerxes life, and then he turns around and refuses to obey his orders of bowing to Haman, his highest representative. In the one place Mordecai is a conservative, and in the next he is a liberal. In the one he is a loyal citizen, and in the next he is a rebel. We need to study both sides of the patriotism of Mordecai, for the Bible and history make it clear that the Christian who cannot be paradoxical in his politics and patriotism will not be able to live a life of wisdom in relation to the state. The paradox is, inconsistency in relationship to man is the only way you can be consistent in your relationship to God. Let's focus first on the positive side. I. MORDECAI AS DEFENDER OF THE STATE. By defender, I mean Mordecai risked his life in order to a loyal citizen, and to maintain the order of the state by reporting the conspiracy to kill the king. Mordecai was a foreigner, and he could have had the attitude that this is not my country, so what do I care? The believer is one who knows God is the God of order, and unless the leaders of a state are so corrupt that a revolution is demanded, those leaders should be honored. Many Christians have, and do now, live under tyrants, and forms of government that we could not tolerate as Americans. They live with far less freedom than us, but they still love their country, and are patriotic. One of the reasons the Jews have been able to become leaders in nations all over the world is because they have practiced the principle of honoring and defending the state they
  • 13. are in. Paul in Rom. 13 lays this down as a principle for Christians in any state. "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God..." They are to receive our respect and honor. By practicing this Christianity has been able to thrive under all sorts of governments. Mordecai was a great example of this principle, and thus a great asset to the Persian Empire. By becoming an informer he took a great risk for the sake of Xerxes, for informers tend to get their names added to the hit list. Vincent Teresa was the number 3 man in the New England Mafia. He had stolen 10 million for himself in crime, and 150 million for his bosses and confederates. When he turned informer, back in the early 70's, dozens of big times mobsters ended up in prison. It took the FBI's most brilliant minds working constantly just to keep him alive. Assassination squads were everywhere. Doctors, lawyers, and even policeman were paid by Mafia to get him. It may have not have been this hot for Mordecai, but had the assassins found out he was the informer, he would have been their first target. He took risks to be a defender of the state. He was a hero of the state, and he was later greatly rewarded for his loyalty. Patriotism played a major role in God's providence in his life, and all of Israel. Patriotism is a virtue, but we must see that it also has its limitations. When the state is exalted to the level of God, then defense of the state is idolatry. Patriotism can have many motives, and this is why it is only a relative, and not an absolute, virtue. Even the Mafia are patriotic towards America, for its freedoms make it the greatest place on earth for crime. Vincent Teresa closes his book, My Life In The Mafia, with this paragraph. “Let me tell you something: I'm the proudest guy in the world to be an American. Before I went to jail I had plenty of chances to take off and go live in a villa on the Italian coast, but I wouldn't leave this country. I'd rather spend 20 years in the can in America than 20 years free in Italy. The reason is, I love this country, and that's the way it is with most mob guys. The mob will not stand for anything against this country. They'll rob from government arsenals and rob government stock and sell it; but if they could discover that anyone's trying to overthrow the country or anything like that, they'll fight him. Most mob guys that I know of vote. We vote whatever is the best way to make money. If its going to be one of these guys who is going to be on the reform kick all the time, we'll all band together and vote against him.” There is a higher percentage of the Mafia who vote, then of born again Christians. So what I am saying is that patriotism is good, but not an absolute good. If not modified by a higher loyalty to God, it can become an evil. Thus, we turn to the other side of Mordecai and see-
  • 14. II. MORDECAI AS THE DEFIER OF THE STATE. Verse 2 of chapter 3 makes it clear that bowing to Haman was not a mere matter of courtesy, it was the law of the land, for the king had commanded it. Not to bow was an act of defiance against the state. Mordecai refused to bow. He had just risked his life for Xerxes, but now when there is no risk at all involved, he will not join the others and bow. What has happened to his patriotism as a loyal citizen? Mordecai seems to be inconsistent. After all, he let his daughter marry the king, so he is related to him, and yet he will not pay him the respect of bowing to his highest representative. The result of this stubborn refusal is that Haman becomes hateful, and determines the entire Jewish race will pay for this insubordination. Either Mordecai is a stubborn fool, or he is standing for a principle more precious than life itself. The only clue we have is in verse 4 where Mordecai's only defense for his action is that he was a Jew. In other words, we are dealing here with an issue of religious liberty, or the multifaceted and complex issue of the separation of church and state. What Mordecai is saying is that as a Jew there is a limit as to how far he can go in conforming to the state. He could risk his life for the state, but he could not give up his religious liberty by bowing to Haman, for he would be giving to the state the allegiance he owed only to God. The issue here is really a matter of idolatry. Do we obey God or man? The whole thing would be sheer folly if it was a matter of personal pride. If Mordecai just didn't like Haman, his action would be disgraceful. He risks the lives of his people out of stubborn pride. If we see it as a battle for religious liberty, however, then we can see what has been a pattern of God's providence all through history. Mordecai had his priorities straight. God is number one, and the state can never be obeyed if it attempts to usurp that place in our lives. The defenders of the state must become defiers of the state when the state threatens to crush religious liberty. The state has a right to our loyalty as long as it recognizes its place in God's providence. When it begins to encroach on God's domain, then our loyalty to God demands that we defy the state. The state becomes Satanic when it demands of us allegiance due only to God. We must chose then either to deify the state, or defy the state. We know the issue of bowing to Haman was an attempt to deify the state, for we have the record of Herodotus the ancient historian. He tells us of others who came to Xerxes, and who refused to acknowledge him as god. He tells of the Lacedoemonians whom the guards forced to their knees before Xerxes, yet, they refused to bow their heads, for they said they had not come to Persia for the purpose of worshipping a man. Xerxes excused them from bowing, for he had respect for their religious liberty. Haman, you will note,
  • 15. never told Xerxes that his hatred of the Jews and Mordecai stemmed from Mordecai's refusal to bow to him. This was never reported to Xerxes at all, for if it had been, he would have nipped it in the bud right there, for he allowed for religious liberty. Haman is the culprit in the book of Esther, for his personal hatred, based on his desire to be treated like deity, is the cause for all the evil in the book. He plotted to get all the Jews killed so Xerxes would never even know why. What we are dealing with here is a corrupt politician in an otherwise reasonably just government. Haman had let power go to his head, and he will not tolerate being treated as secondary to God. He will get revenge on those who dare to put God first. The lesson of Esther is that the believer can never do anything other than defy those who presume to take God's place. The history of America revolves around this basic principle. A hundred years before the revolutionary war, king Charles II of England demanded that the Mass. colony relinquished its religious liberty, and let the Church of England control things, with only church members having the right to vote. The Puritans were enraged, and went into their pulpits preaching that they must defy the kings orders. Better that they die free than submit to such tyranny. The king heard of their rebellion, and ordered 5,000 troops to sail to Mass. to crush the rebellion. Increase Mather called for a day of prayer and fasting, and later they learned that king Charles had died on that very day of 1685. The result was the army never set sail. The Puritans were convinced that defiance to a state which threatens religious liberty is obedience to God. This principle became the foundation for the American Revolution. The result is we are a nation where the right to defy the government is guaranteed. If the state tries to interfere with our religious liberty, we can take the state to the supreme court, and fight for our rights. We have a Constitution which gives us a right to protest and demonstrate against our governments policies. Thank God for freedom that most of the world has never known. What we have is based on the basic truth that man has the right to put God first, and to defy any authority that tries to take that first place in our lives. Most of us have never lived through a period where the state is deified, and demanded absolute allegiance. Hopefully we will never have to, but the Christians under Hitler had to. I never realized until recently that Hitler established his own church in Germany. It was called The German Church Of Positive Christianity. Its design was to counter-act all Christian opposition, and destroy Christianity. It was extremely effective, and won most of the youth of Germany. Julius Leuthenses wrote, "Adolf Hitler is own living witness of the present era, who confirms the good work of the eternal Divine Spirit in history, and who, through his activity, enables us to understand in a new way the
  • 16. teachings of Christ and His mission. Our watchword is not that Hitler is equal to Christ, but: Through Hitler to Jesus Christ." That is just the beginning. Soon the preaching of the cross was forbidden in church. The picture of Hitler was hung in front of all churches, and he was referred to in official statements as the way, the truth, and the light. All Germans were urged to die for him, and make their dying words heil Hitler. Hitler was so clever, only the devil himself could have been guiding him, for he completely revised Christianity, and made Nazism a perverted Christianity. He declared mount Hesselberg his sacred mountain, and Julius Streicher his high priest. Standing before the bonfire he said, "When we look into the flames of this holy fire, and throw our sins into them, we can descend from this mountain with clean souls. We do not need priests and ministers. We have become our own priests." Hitler actually became a god to millions of people who could not see their folly until it was to late. I share this because Hitler and Haman were two of a kind. There pride, racial hatred, and abuse of power make them brothers of the pit. Both sought to wipe out the Jewish race. But there were Mordecai's in Hitler's day as well. They defied the state, and fought Hitler, and they made a difference. The tragic fact is, these Mordecai's were two few in number. The majority of Christians, both Catholic and Protestant, were deceived by Hitler's clever use of patriotism. The people were whipped into a religious frenzy of love and loyalty to the Fatherland. Hitler could do not wrong, and Germany could do no wrong. The Patriotic fervor so captivated Christians, that the voices of the church in opposition were muted. Hitler was free to do the works of Satan with little resistance. Millions of Christians cooperated in the killing of 6 million Jews. It is the story of history repeating itself over and over again, because of idolatry. God's people bowed down to a false god, and as always, the result is tragic judgment. Had there been more Mordecai's defying the state when it began to encroach on God's territory, the tragic and demonic history of Germany could have been avoided. Many Christian leaders are writing today of the danger of an American Civil Religion. It uses Christian terminology, just as Hitler did, but it is not Christian. It is a state religion that is designed to convince Christian people that everything the state does is the will of God. It is a powerful political tool. Because of the ever present danger of the state becoming a god, the Christian must be all the more conscious of the need to exalt the Lordship of Jesus. Nothing is Christian, no matter how good, or how American, which does not bow to Jesus Christ, and confess Him as Lord. Mordecai, as a Jew, would bow to none but Jehovah, and you and I, as Christians, can bow to
  • 17. none but Jesus. Because it is so, we must be ready to both defend and defy the state. 3 GOD IS LIGHT, BASED ON I JOHN 1:5 The Emperor Trajan said to Rabbi Joshua, "You teach that your God is everywhere. I should like to see Him." The Rabbi replied, "God's presence is everywhere, but He cannot be seen. No mortal eye can behold His glory." The Emperor insisted, however, and so the Rabbi said, "Let us begin then by first looking at one of his servants. The Emperor consented to this, and so followed the Rabbi out into the open. "Now," said the Rabbi, "Gaze into the splendor of the sun." "I cannot," said the Emperor, "The light dazzles me." The Rabbi responded, "Thou art unable to endure the light of one of his servants, and canst thou expect to behold the resplendent glory of the Creator. Would not such a light annihilate thee." The Jews had a higher concept of God than all ancient peoples, because God revealed Himself to them as a God of glory, light, and splendor. The Old Testament has many descriptions of God like that given in Hab. 3:3-4. "His glory covered the heavens, and His praise filled the earth. His splendor was like the sun rise; rays flashed from His hand, where His power was hidden." It was because of this knowledge of the glory of God that the Jews were an optimistic people. A man's character is determined largely by the character of the God he worships. If one worships a god who is a tyrant, and unpredictable, and without mercy, but cruel, it is not likely he will be a man of flaming joy. Luther lived for years with a false concept of God, and as a result, lived in fear and dread. Most religions have had such a dark concept of God that the followers of these religions seldom knew what it was to be truly joyful and at peace. Many ancient peoples, and peoples yet today, whose God's are made in the image of man, and are only depraved supermen, cruel and immoral, are no more optimistic than the materialist who says, "I feel the universe is one huge, dead, immeasurable steam engine, rolling on, in its dead indifference, to grind us limb from limb." You can't expect persons like that to be bursting with optimism, and bubbling with joy. On the other hand, when people have the concept of God as He is revealed in Scripture, it leads to optimism and joy. This was true in the Old Testament, even before God fully revealed Himself in Jesus Christ. The Jews began their day at sundown, rather than at sunup. All their festivals and holidays begin at night, and their Sabbath also begins at night. All of this was to symbolize their optimism and confidence in the God of light. Anyone can have confidence in the day, and look forward to a bright day when the sun rises, but the Jews began their rejoicing as the sun sank to symbolize their confidence that even in the darkness light will prevail, and a new day will dawn. Tomorrow always comes for the believer. Even death cannot change that. Such
  • 18. was the attitude of the Jews who had only a shadow of the full revelation yet to come. How much greater ought our joy and optimism to be who stand in the full light? Paul in II Cor. 4:6 writes, "For God, who said, "Let light shine out of darkness," made His light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ." We have a message as superior to the Old Testament, as it was to the pagan darkness surrounding it. That is why John, after stating that his purpose for writing this book was that the joy of believers might be full, immediately announces the truth on which all Christian joy is based, which is, the truth that God is light. This morning we want to examine this primary message and its meaning. First let's look at the message itself. I. THE MESSAGE. John has built us up to a point of expectation. He has made great statements of his aim to share with us truths that will lead to fullness of fellowship, and fullness of joy. We ought to be standing on our tiptoes breathlessly longing to see what it is he is going to declare. In verse 5, after this stimulating introduction, John says, this is it! Here it is! This is the message that we have received, and now pass it on to you. This is no matter of speculation and theory, this is the message we have heard from Christ Himself, and now declare to you, and that message is, God is light and in Him is no darkness at all. We see a positive and negative side to this message. A. Positive-God is light. This is the strongest statement in the whole Bible about Gods nature as light. Many text describe the splendor of God, and the light of His presence, and that He dwells in light unapproachable, and that He is the author of all light, but here alone do we find the statement that God is light. Nothing stronger can be said. This is as far as human language can go in relating God and light. God is light. Light is of the very essence of God's nature. It is important, however, that we recognize that this is not the whole truth about God's nature. It is but one aspect of what He is. John will tell us He is also Law, Life, and Love, and underneath all of these is the foundational fact that He is personal. Light is impersonal, and if this was our main concept of God, we would have only a God who was a great impersonal source of all energy-a Divine Dynamo. We must ever keep in mind that light and love, and all other attributes of God are attributes of a Person. This means, it is God who is light, and not light that is God. This was the mistake of many people who began to worship the creation rather than the Creator. They worshipped the sun, moon, and stars, for they reversed the truth and said, light is God. This is false. The light of the sun is not God, and the light of all other bodies is not God. God as light is the ultimate source of all light, but He is not that light. All physical light is from God, and is a symbol of what He is in Himself. All physical reality is what it is because God is what He
  • 19. is. Science can tell us what the sun does, and how it is the source of all life on earth, but it is the Bible that tells us why this is so. It is so because God is light. His creation resembles His nature. The universe is a symbol of what God is. It is not God, but is made by God, and is separate from Him, but it is an expression of what He is. This is why all life depends on light, for all life depends on God, and God is light. This is why the earth revolves around the sun which is the source of all life, because only as men put God into the center of their lives, and revolve around Him, will they have light and life. All of this is simply saying God has made the universe, and physical light, as a pattern of what is true in the spiritual realm. God is in the spiritual realm what the sun is in the physical realm. He is the source of all light and life. As light is the absolute in science, so God is the absolute in the spiritual realm. Thou art, O God, the life and light Of all this wondrous world we see; Its glow by day, its smile by night, Are but reflections caught from Thee; Where'er we turn, Thy glories shine, And all things fair and bright are Thine. The very first thing that God called good was light. In Gen. 1:4 God saw that the light was good. It was His first stroke of the brush on the canvas of reality, and it was a masterpiece already. God did not make anything in the dark. He began His project of creation just as we usually begin ours, by turning on the light. Light is the link between the Creator and creation. Light is part of the nature of God, and it is the foundation of all that God has made. When you study light, you are into both science and theology. Many of the great scientists have known this. They have seen that life is dependent on light, and that the Creator of life had to be a God of light. Dr. Michael Pupin, the great inventor, philosopher, and teacher, got his start in scientific research by watching the stars as a shepherd boy in the Hungarian hills. All his life, as he studied light, he was devoted to the God of light. He wrote, "I found in the light of stars a heavenly language which proclaims the glory of God. Each burning star is a focus of energy, of life-giving activity which it pours out lavishly into every direction; it pours out the life of its own heart, in order to beget new life. What a vista that opens to our imagination! What new beauties are disclosed in the words of Genesis: 'God...breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.' The light of the stars is a part of the life-giving breath of God. I never look now upon the starlit vault of heaven without feeling this divine breath and its quickening action upon my soul. Kepler, after discovering the laws that govern the speeds of the planets, prayed, "Dear Lord, who hast guided us to the light of Thy glory by the light of nature, thanks be Thee.
  • 20. Behold, I have complete the work to which Thou hast called me, and I rejoice in the creation whose wonder thou hast given me to reveal unto men. Amen." The power of life is in light, and without light life cannot continue. We could get into biology here, but man's new discovery of the power of light is more fascinating. Albert Einstein back in 1905 wrote a paper on light that won him the Nobel Prize. In it he proved that light is both a wave and a particle, and so light is a paradox, and has the freedom to be different things in different experiments. He predicted then that man would be able to some day use light in a very intense and focused ray. In 1960 Dr. Theodore Maiman made and used the first laser, and since this, many new lasers have been developed for doing what man could never do before. Now, by the power of light, the life of man is being radically changed. In our life-time light has changed almost every facet of our lives. The books I checked out to study light were checked out by means of a laser light. The groceries we purchase our read by a laser light. Laser light can cut steel and even diamonds. Lasers are used for eye surgery, so that those who once would be blind are now made to see. Miracles that Jesus did as the light of the world are now being done by light, which also has Him as its author and creator. The military uses lasers in missals and other weapons. The whole security systems of the world depend on lasers. Laser optical discs can hold the entire Encyclopedia Brittanica on one side. There seems to be no end to the power and blessings that man is finding in the power of light. If God lets history go on into the 21st century, man will create a whole new world by the power of light. And if God ends history soon, the result will be the same, for in eternity we will dwell with God in that city filled with the light of His presence. However the story of history goes, we can be optimists as Christians, for we are heading for the light. Georgia Harkness wrote, Our light grows dim, the air is thick with gloom, And everywhere mens souls are crushed with fears. Yet high above the carnage and the gloom The call resounds across the teeming years, Lift high Christ's cross! Serve God and trust His might! I do believe the world is swinging toward the light. Light is not only the coming thing, because Jesus, the light, is coming, but He is already here, and says in John 8:12, "I am the light of the world: He who follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life." Gilchrist Lawson wrote, The one who made the earthly sun So full of power of warmth and might, Can cause the Sun of Righteousness To bathe the soul in floods of light. The greatest changes in life are always based on what man
  • 21. does with his physical or spiritual light. Jesus was the light that lightens every man said John. He was and is the light of the world. He was and is the source of life that is eternal, for all life needs light, and He is the only light that can never be put out, and so He is the only source of eternal life. Light that we see is self revealing. One does not need to light a match to see if his flashlight is on. But all men are blind to most of the light God has made a part of reality. We see only the six colors of the rainbow which is white light devided up into its six different wave lengths. But this is a mere fraction of light. There are cosmic rays, gamma rays, x-rays, ultraviolet rays, infrared rays, television, radar, short wave, standard and long radio waves, and long electric waves. These ten different categories of light we cannot see. But man has learned how to use these invisible sources of light to do wonders in life. So the challenge of the Christian life is to recognize there is great power available in the realm of the invisible. Paul says in II Cor. 4:18, "So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal." There is power for life abundant in the light of Christ's unseen presence, and in the light of the illuminating power of the Holy Spirit. We need to pray, Light of the world, illumine this darkened earth of Thine, Till everything that's human be filled with the Divine. There is no physical factor in all reality that can better be used as a symbol of the nature of God, than light, for as Alford, the Greek scholar said, "It unites in itself purity,and cleanness, and beauty, and glory, as no other material object does." Light is the most spiritual of all the things we know in the realm of the physical. The more we know about light and its blessings, the more we will understand the glory and splendor of God, who is light, and the source of all lights. Then John adds to his positive message a statement which is- B. Negative-in Him is no darkness at all. The Greek here is very emphatic. There is a double negative here, which is permitted in Greek, and would sound like this in English, "There is not none at all." This is the concept that is the basis for a common bond among believers, and is the basis for much joy. The positive without his strong negative would not distinguish Christianity from the Gnostics and many other false religions. The Gnostics, like the ancient Persians, had a dualism in their concept of deity, in which, there was both light and darkness in God. Many others have also had concepts of God which while recognizing Him to be glorious, also attributed to Him much evil. The Christian revelation rises to the heights of a God who is absolutely pure, and is not the origin of any evil. This becomes the basis for our fullness of joy, for the God and Father of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is light without darkness. Even the sun has spots, but not our God, for He is perfect light, and the source of all good, but no evil. Any idea of God that implies He is the source of evil is inconsistent with the New Testament revelation. E.S. Jones
  • 22. tells the story of the little girl who was playing with a friend when a cloud came up and covered the Sun. She looked up and said, "That mean old God again, always spoiling our fun." The mother heard it and that night she told the father. He was shocked and did not understand where in the world she would get such a concept of God. They punished her by making her say her prayers ten times. Imagine, prayers being made as a punishment, and yet they wondered where she got her concept of a cruel God. Parents may in many ways convey to their children concepts of God that include spots and shadows of darkness. This message of John must be our guide. God is light and in Him is no darkness at all. We need the light of God to guide us so that we do not blot His image with the darkness of our own ignorance and faulty faith. Let our prayer be that of Constance Milman. Lord send thy light, Not only in the darkest night, But in the shadows, dim twilight, Wherein my strained and aching sight Can scarce distinguish wrong from right, Then send thy light. The light of God is known by the fact that in it is no darkness at all. Satan himself can appear as an angel of light, and the world uses light to glorify all its evil, but we need not be seduced by these false lights if we keep this absolute negative in mind-no darkness at all. Wordsworth put it, "But ne'er to a seductive lay, let faith be given. Nor deem that light which leads astray, is light from heaven." This then, is the message that is essential to making our fellowship unique and joy complete. Now, let us consider some further meanings contained in this message. II. THE MEANINGS. A message like this is filled with more meaning than we can begin to comprehend. To say that God is light sheds more light on His nature than we have eyes to see, but what we can see is important to look at. The first thing we want to look at is- A. The Ethical Meaning. This is really the primary meaning that John is conveying in this context. God is absolutely pure. God is righteousness, and in Him is no sin at all. That is why John goes on to say, "If we say we have fellowship with God and walk in darkness we are liars," for God cannot fellowship with men who walk in darkness. He is light, and light has nothing in common with darkness, and, therefore, fellowship is impossible. A man living in sin can no more walk with God than fire and gasoline can have fellowship together. God is absolutely ethically pure, and that is why Christians must constantly confess their sins and be cleansed by the blood of Christ, for it is the only way we can truly have fellowship with God. In this context John makes clear there are two ways of thinking that are false, and lead to false living. One is to imply that there is any sin in God, and two is to deny that there is sin in man. The Christian must be clear on both points. God is light, and is pure, with no darkness at all, but
  • 23. no man, except he who was God incarnate, and the light of the world, is totally pure, and without some degree of darkness due to sin. Christian ethical thinking must be based on these two truths. The Gnostics denied them, and the result was all kinds of unethical and immoral conduct. Let this principle be a guide. God is far more than we can think, but He is never less than what we can think. This means, if you can think of a higher concept of God than the one you now have, the one you now have is a false concept. God can never be less than the highest you can conceive. Whenever men talk about God, you can know if they speak of the true God, or one of their own making, by simply asking, is the God they speak of the highest and purest that man can conceive. If the God they speak of cannot measure up to this standard, he is not the God who is light, and in whom is no darkness at all. B. The Intellectual Meaning. When we say a person has seen the light, we mean the truth has been grasped by the mind. Light and truth are often synonymous. This could be paraphrased, God is truth and in Him is no error at all. It means, not only that God is absolutely pure, but He is also absolutely wise. This is again a basis for great joy for the believer. He has a resource like no other. Jesus said the Holy Spirit would lead His disciples into all truth. He can do this, for as light, He knows all truth. All our knowledge, sense, and sight Lie in deepest darkness shrouded. Til Thy Spirit brakes our night, With the beams of truth unclouded. There is much more meaning in this message-the theological, biological, emotional, but we can't cover them all. What we have looked at, however, ought to make it clear how great a message this is, and how a deeper understanding of it will lead to a greater fellowship and joy in the believers life. Praise God for who He is for God is light. 4. MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF MARVELOUS GRACE II PET1:2 A snowstorm made it impossible for a guess speaker to get to the church where he was to preach. Therefore, a local man was asked to come in as a substitute. The speaker began by explaining the meaning of substitute. If you break a window he said, and then place a cardboard there instead--that is a substitute. After his sermon, a woman came up to him, shook his hand and wishing to compliment him said, "You are no substitute. You are a real pane." Unfortunately, verbal communication does not reveal how a word is spelled, and so, if he heard "pain" rather than "pane" as she intended, he would have received a message just the opposite of what she meant to convey. We must constantly be aware of the complications of language if we hope to effectively communicate.
  • 24. Words can be alike and yet be very different depending on the context. If I say you have good vision, or you have good sight, these words are very close in meaning. But if I say my daughter is a vision, and yours is a sight, I am in trouble, for some how they do not remain synonymous in this context. When we come to the word grace, or charis in the Greek, we are dealing with one word that can mean opposite things depending upon the context. We miss the complexity of this word because in our English translations there are 11 different English words used to translate this one Greek word. We are not even aware most often that charis is being used. The root idea of the word is that which is pleasing, or which gives pleasure. From there it develops numerous connections with various kinds of pleasure and favor. It's meaning becomes so diverse that it is hard to see how the same word can be used for so many things, and often with no apparent connection. Our English word grace has followed the same pattern in a small way. You have a 30 day grace period on your insurance policy. This fits the idea of unmerited favor. They carry you for 30 days even though you don't deserve it, because you have not paid your premium. But what has this got to do with saying grace before you eat? You do not say unmerited favor, but you say thanks, which is your expression of favor to God. But if you say the swan has grace, you do not mean it has unmerited favor, or that it has thanks. You mean it has natural elegance, beauty of line and movement. It makes a favorable impression on us by its grace. We haven't begun to list all the meanings this word can have, but it is clear from these few examples, that the word has to be constantly redefined according to the context. A man living on the boarder of Minnesota and Wisconsin was puzzled for years as to which state he actually lived in. Finally he got around to having a special survey made. When the surveyor reported to him that he lived in Wisconsin, he tossed his hat in the air and shouted, "Hooray! No more of those cold Minnesota winters!" Of course, redefining where you are located does not change the weather, but to redefine a word can change the whole atmosphere of a passage. Grace is a warm and positive word usually, but it can be used in a cold and negative way. Charis means favor, and favor can be shown to those who do not deserve it, and thus, you have unmerited favor. Sound great doesn't it? But what if you were a student who worked hard for a scholarship and fulfilled all the requirements, but the gift went to student x, who didn't do a thing, but whose sister was the wife of the teacher, and so got it because of connections? Here is a form of unmerited favor which we call favoritism. It is unjust because it favors someone at the expense of another more deserving. Greek citizens had to swear an oath not to show this kind of charis for or against a fellow citizen. Charis, in this sense, is equivalent to the Hebrew idea of respect of persons. The Bible makes it clear that God is no respecter of persons. He shows no favoritism. That is why the
  • 25. universalism of God's grace is stressed in the New Testament. Christ died for all men. This avoids any danger of reading the negative idea of favoritism into God's grace. The word is used this way in the New Testament, however. Paul, the apostle of positive grace, was a victim of negative grace. In Acts 24:27 we read, "Felix desiring to do the Jews a favor left Paul in prison." Here was favor, or grace, expressed for a selfish reason, and at the expense of another--namely Paul. In Acts 25:9 we see the same thing. Fetus wishing to do the Jews a favor took their side against Paul. This is the kind of grace that corrupts. The poet put it-- When rogues like these (a sparrow cries) To honors and employment rise, I court no favor, ask no place For such preferment is disgrace. The paradox is that there is a grace which is a disgrace, for it is the receiving of unmerited favor which is unjust, because it is at the expense of others. Now, as if this is not enough complexity, being able to mean either good or bad unmerited favor, we want to see that it can also mean merited favor. Most often Christians define grace as only unmerited favor, but this is putting a limit on the word which the New Testament does not do. It should not be surprising that grace can also mean merited favor. It is logical that favor is going to be shown toward those who merit it. No man merits salvation, which is the greatest aspect of God's grace, but many are pleasing to God by their obedience, and God responds to them in grace. To see this in operation, we need to go to the very first reference to grace in the New Testament. In Luke 1:30 the angel says, "Fear not, Mary, for you have found favor with God." Favor here is charis again. Mary was not sinless, but she was pure and lovely in character, and her life pleased God. She was chosen to be the mother of the Messiah because of her pure life. It is obvious she did not merit this honor in the sense that she was worthy, for no person could ever be worthy to give birth to the Son of God. On the other hand, she was not holy unfit to be Christ's mother, for she had a life pleasing to God, and the kind of life needed for His purpose. God did not favor her because she was less pure and righteous than others, but because of her exceptional purity and righteousness. She attracted God's favor by the beauty of her life. The clearest example of merited favor is in connection with Christ Himself. Luke 2:52 says, "Jesus increased in wisdom and stature, and in favor with God and man." Favor is charis again. You can see how meaningless it would be to define grace here as unmerited favor. This would mean that Jesus was not worthy of the favor of God, but God granted it anyway. And men, out of the goodness of their hearts, showed favor to Christ, even though he did not deserve it. This, of course, would be sheer nonsense. Grace here means merited favor. Jesus by the inherent beauty, goodness, and harmony of his life, attracted the favor of God and man. Jesus had a quality of character that fully merited all the
  • 26. favor He received. This is an aspect of grace that we are seldom aware of. We tend to think of grace as a one way street: God's grace toward us. But favor works both ways in the New Testament. If God favors us and gives us blessings, we in turn favor God, and respond with gratitude to His graciousness. Our response is described by this same word--charis. We respond with grace. Listen to Paul in-- I Cor. 15:57, "But thanks be to God who gives us the victory..." II Cor. 2:14, "But thanks be to God, who in Christ always leads us in triumph." II Cor. 8:16, "But thank to God who puts the same earnest care for you into the heart of Titus." II Cor. 9:15, "Thanks be to God for His inexpressible gift." In each case, do you know what the Greek word is for thanks? It is charis, the same word used all through the New Testament for grace and favor. Grace be to God Paul says over and over again as he expresses his love and gratitude for God's grace. Here is grace which is merited. God merits our favor in every way, and therefore, all of man's grace to God is merited grace. This, of course, is where grace gets its connection with prayer before meals. We express our favor and thanks to God for His favor and goodness to us. Therefore, to multiply in grace means to grow in thankfulness, among other things. There are numerous passages where grace is the root idea in thanksgiving. The Greek word for thanksgiving is eucharist, and you see charis as the heart of it. The Lord's Supper is called the feast of the eucharist, or the feast of thanksgiving. It is our expression of grace for the great grace of God in giving us His Son. Grace at the very heart of the Gospel, as it is expressed in this poetic version of John 3:16. For God--the Lord of earth and heaven, so loved and longed to see forgiven, The world--in sin and pleasure mad, that He gave the greatest gift He had-- His only begotten Son--to take our place: That whosoever-- Oh what grace; Believeth--placing simple trust in Him--the righteous and the just, Should not parish lost in sin, But have eternal life--in Him. When we feel great joy because we have experienced God's grace or favor, we are experiencing a form of grace in our joy, for the Greek word for joy is chara. When we feel joyful, we are feeling graceful, which means full of favor. The word chara is used in the following Bible passages: Matt. 2:10, "When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy (chara)." Matt. 5:12, "Rejoice and be exceeding glad (chara): for great is your reward in heaven..." 6Matt. 13:44 , "Again, the kingdom of heaven is like treasure hid in afield; when a man has found it, he hides, and for joy
  • 27. (chara) thereof goes and sells all that he has, and buys that field."Matt. 18:13 describes the Lord's joy (chara) at finding the lost sheep. Matt. 25:21, 23, "His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful servant: you have been faithful over a few things, I will make the ruler over many things: enter into the joy (chara) of thy lord."We begin to see the relationship between joy and that which causes joy, namely, the favor and bounty which we receive from the Lord. In the realm of redemption, all of God's grace is favor toward those who not only do not merit it, but who deserve His wrath. In the gift of Christ, and salvation in Him, there is nothing but God's love to account for it. There is much of the grace of God, however, that flows out to men on the basis of their obedience. In other words, we can win the favor of God, and grow in grace by acts and attitudes which please Him. Peter uses charis to refer to a clear case of merited grace in I Peter 2:19-20. You would never know it, however, for charis is hidden behind the English word of commendable. He writes, "For it is commendable (charis), if a man bears up under the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God. But how is it to your credit if you receive a beating for doing wrong and endure it? But if you suffer for doing good and you endure it, this is commendable (charis), before God." Peter is saying, it is worthy of thanks, merit, and God's favor, if you, like Christ, suffer for righteousness sake. Grace does not lessen, but increases as we become more Christlike. God's grace flows forth, not only to sinners in abundance, but to the saints as well. Milton in Paradise Lost refers to God's grace as bountiful generosity to those who serve Him. Yet so much bounty is in God, such grace, That who advances His glory, not their own, Them He Himself to glory will advance. From this idea we go on to see that grace refers to the many gifts of God to His children. Grace is not only the generosity of the giver, and the gratitude of the receiver, it is the gift also. The Greek for gift is charisma. A gift is something with which you express favor, and so charis is the basic idea in the word gift. It could be translated gracious gift. In the well known Rom. 6:23, "The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord:" Gift is charisma, or gracious gift. Here we are in realm of redemption, and, as always, God's grace is totally unmerited. It is in contrast to the wages of sin. Wages imply merit or earned remuneration. Men merit, or deserve, death and damnation. They earn this by their life of sin. The gift of God, however, is not earned, but is a gift of unmerited favor. God's grace runs all through the New Testament under the word gift. God's giving does not end with salvation, however. His grace is sufficient for all of life, and He goes on giving gifts, as aspects of His grace. In II Cor. 1:11 Paul says,
  • 28. "You also must help us by prayer, so that many will give thanks (eucharis) on our behalf for the blessing (charisma) granted us in answer to many prayers." All blessings are gifts of grace. Some are merited, and some are not. We know the Bible says much about gifts, but we have not been conscious of the fact that these are parts of grace. Men with special gifts of God are called charismatic. They are full of grace. As we multiply in grace, we grow in our capacity to be used of God, for we acquire, develop, and perfect more gifts as channels of His grace. In I Peter 4:10 Peter says, "As each has received a gift (charisma) employ it for one another as good stewards of God's varied grace." The whole of Christian service is an extension of God's grace. He gives it to us, and we pass it on. When we show favor we are being channels of God's grace. God's grace can be experienced through us. The giver, the receiver, the gift of power, love, joy, kindness, and innumerable other values are included in this marvelous word grace. Now we can understand why Paul begins everyone of his letters with grace, ends everyone of them with grace and fills them with references to it, and builds his theology around it. Paul was the great Apostle of grace, and of the 155 references to it in the N.T., 130 of them are from his pen. Now we can understand why Peter also makes a big issue of it, and why he wants to see grace multiplied in the lives of believers, and why he in 3:18 ends his letter by urging them to grow in grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Grace is the source of all that is included in salvation and sanctification. Everything we are, and do, and will ever be, and do, depends on our growth in grace. Therefore, let our prayer be that which was left by the Duchess of Gordon among her papers when she died. "O Lord, give me grace to feel the need of Thy grace; give me grace to ask for Thy grace; and when in Thy grace Thou hast given me grace, give me grace to use Thy grace." This is a prayer very consistent with the theology of the N.T. for we read in Heb. 4:16 something quite similar. "Let us then approach the throne of grace with confidence, so that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in our time of need." The point is, we need grace, not only as sinner who need to be saved, we need grace to be saints who are becoming what God wants us to be. It is cheap grace when we just trust in Christ to save us, and then do not call upon His grace to sanctify us and help us do his will. I like the KJV and the RSV of our text of II Pet. better, for they translate it, "Grace and peace be multiplied unto you.." Peter goes on to tell the Christians to add one virtue after another to their lives, but here he begins by saying don't just add grace, but let it be multiplied. The NIV means the same thing with its, "Grace and peace be yours in abundance..", but the word multiplied adds to the emphasis, and its absence subtracts from the sum that the word grace deserves. A six year old boy ran home from school, and immediately
  • 29. went to the back of his house and grabbed his pet rabbit out of his cage. He shouted at it, 2 plus 2, and he kept it up until his mother came out and asked him what he was doing. He said, as he put the rabbit back in its cage with an attitude of contempt, "Our teacher told us today that rabbits multiply rapidly, but this dumb bunny can't even add." Their was obviously some misunderstanding here about multiplying. But there is no such misunderstanding about multiplying in grace in the N. T. No word in the N.T. carries more of the content of the Gospel than the word grace. Griffith Thomas said of it, "...perhaps the greatest word in the Bible because it is the word most truly expressive of God's character and attitude in relation to man." The Interpreter's Bible without reservation says, "Grace is the greatest word in the New Testament, and in the human vocabulary." Another author says, " Mastery of the Bible's teaching about Grace is the most important goal of the Christian Way of Life."To grow in grace, and to multiply grace, and have it in abundance is what the Christian life is all about according to the New Testament. To give God pleasure by our lives we need to be growing in grace, and this means giving favor, and not just receiving it. The value of studying all aspects of grace is that we do not limit it to just one of its many beautiful meanings, and thereby lose much of what God wants us to receive as well as give. Unmerited favor is true and vital, but it is only one part of grace. We are to seek God's grace by meriting it as well. The whole idea of reward is based on grace. We please God by obedience and we win His grace and thus, are rewarded. His grace also covers His favor in doing all sorts of things for us that we cannot do ourselves. In fact I discovered on the internet that one author who studies grace in depth came to the conclusion that the best definition of grace is, "God doing for us what we cannot do for ourselves!" Let me share a quote from this author who calls himself brother Dan. He posted this on the internet for millions of people to read. I just read the thesaurus on my word processor regarding the word"grace". Let me try to explain what I just learned. First, there were several meanings given for grace: Elegance, Kindness, Mercy, Holiness, Invocation, and Beautify. Elegance is not a definition of grace we usually consider when we are discussing God's grace theology. But, let us consider the synonyms for elegance just for what illumination God may give us: polish, refinement, attractiveness, beauty, charm, and comeliness. In line with this is the definition 'beautify', and its synonyms: adorn, decorate, embellish, enhance, ornament, crown, and deck. At first glance, these two definitions with their synonyms may not seem to be all that theologically significant in studying "grace".But, I believe that God would have us know that the true image of elegance and beauty are only found in His nature. He wants to polish and adorn us. We are His creation. He knows what we need most. God wants to refine, embellish, enhance and crown us with His
  • 30. Eternal, Holy and Sovereign character. When we discovered that Jesus was calling us, we were so ugly. In light of God's nature, we, like Adam, must run and hide and cover our ugly nakedness. But, God picks us up and begins to bring out our true beauty, to manifest His charm and comeliness in our broken spirits. We indeed are ornamented with the fruit of His Holy Spirit, if we allow Him to do His work in us. John J. Clark wrote, "Cheap grace is grace without discipleship, the cross, Jesus Christ living and incarnate.Costly Grace, on the other hand, is the treasure hidden in a field. For the sake of it a man will gladly go and sell all that he has. It is a pearl of great price to buy which will cost us everything. It's the kingly rule of Christ, for whose sake a man will pluck out the eye which causes him to stumble. It is the call of Jesus at which a disciple leaves his nets and follows. It is grace which must be sought again and again, the gift which must be asked for, the door at which a man must knock. Such grace is costly because it calls us to follow, and it is grace because it calls us to follow Jesus Christ. Costly because it costs a man his life, it is grace because it gives a man the only true life. Costly because it condemns sin, and grace because it justifies the sinner. Above all, costly because it cost God the life of His Son: "You have been bought with a price" and what has cost God so much can't be cheap for us. It is grace because God did not reckon his Son too dear a price to pay for our life, but delivered him up for us. It is costly because it compels a man to submit to the yoke of Christ, but it is grace because "My yoke is easy and my burden light". He is illustrating the paradox of grace. It is so free, from one perspective, but so costly from another. It is a most multi-faseted virtue, with multiple meanings, which we are to be busy multiplying in our lives. So let us make the prayer of the Duchess of Gordon, that I read earlier, be our prayer. "O Lord, give me grace to feel the need of Thy grace; give me grace to ask for Thy grace; and when in Thy grace Thou hast given me grace, give me grace to use Thy grace." CHAPTER5 THE SYMPHONY OF SYMPATHY Based on Heb.10:32-34 Few men alive on this planet have suffered more than did James B. Stockdale. He was a prisoner of war for 2,714 days in Vietnam. On one occasion the North Vietnamese handcuffed his hands behind his back, locked his legs in heavy irons, and dragged him from
  • 31. his cell to the unshaded courtyard. They left him lay there for 3 days. The sun burned him, and the guards beat him so he could not sleep. Men died with such torture, but Stockdale survived, and the reason he did was because of the music of sympathy. That is, he got messages from the prisoners that encouraged him to fight on. He would hear a towel snapping in their special prisoner code, and it would say God bless you Jim Stockdale. The sounds of a snapping towel in the midst of torture does not seem like much to us, but for him it was a symphony of sympathy that helped keep him alive. The prisoners of war were isolated, for this is, in itself, a form of torture. Loneliness can be harder to bear than physical pain. The captives, however, developed an elaborate system of communication by which they could send messages from cell to cell, and even from building to building. They used their fingers, fists, elbows, and tin cups, and then they developed a sophisticated tapping routine. Dr. Julius Segal in his book, Winning Life's Toughest Battles, studied these men who survived, and records their amazing efforts to develop their togetherness in a world of isolation. The prisoner assigned to sweep the prison compound used the broom movements to talk to the rest of the prisoners. When walking past another cell the way they would drag their sandals would send a message. Some sent messages by the way they blew their noses, and others by belching. One feigned sleep for a couple of hours each day, and during the siesta period he would, by his snoring, send reports to everyone in his cell block. Nave Lieutenant Commander John S. McCain III, who spent much of his five and a half years in solitary confinement, concluded, "The most important thing for survival as a POW was communication with someone, even if it was only a wave or a wink, or a tap on a wall, or to have a guy put his thumb up. It made all the difference." POW Everett Alvarez said, "They were acts of self-healing. We really got to know each other through our silent conversations across the brick walls. Eventually, we learned all about each other's childhood, back ground, experiences, wives and children, hopes and ambitions." Our hostages in Iran had the same kind of experience. Some of them never met until after they were liberated, yet they felt they knew each other because of the support system they developed. Katherine Koob said, "Just knowing that someone in the next cell cared that I existed helped me go on." All of this confirms the New Testament message on the importance of sympathy. It is a key weapon in surviving and overcoming the unjust suffering of this world. The early Christians had to suffer so much persecution, but that which sustained them and kept the church alive was the symphony of sympathy. The Greek word in Heb. 10:34 is sumpatheo, which means sympathy, or, to suffer with another. Another form of the word is sumpathes, and this is the word used by Peter in I Pet. 3:8 where he writes, "Finally, all of you, live in harmony with one another, be sympathetic, love as brothers, be compassionate and humble." These two Greek words represent, not just a solo instrument, or even a duet, but a
  • 32. whole orchestra of instruments that produce a symphony of sympathy, that brings harmony into a world of discord. Just a partial list of the words that convey some aspects of sympathy will reveal how widespread this virtue is. Synonyms of sympathy are, compassion, condolence, unity, harmony, alliance, concord, tenderness, pity, friendliness, kindness, fellow-feeling, consolation, brotherly-love, and warm-heartedness. In other words, the study of sympathy connects us with practically every relationship virtue of the Christian life. The paradox is, this is a form of suffering that is self-imposed. It is a voluntary choice to enter into the sufferings of another, and feel some of the same pain they do. Here is suffering that could easily be avoided by simply not caring. The opposite of sympathy is antipathy. This is the feeling that you have when you are not drawn to the sufferer to stand along side and feel with him. But, rather, when you are repulsed by the sufferer, and withdraw in hostility to let them stand alone. In between these two extremes of sympathy and antipathy is the neutral apathy, where you are neither pulled toward nor pushed from the sufferer, but are indifferent, with no feelings one way or the other. Elinor Wylie, the poet and novelist, was deeply distressed, and she woke Katherine Porter at four A.M., and when she came to the door Miss Wylie said to her, "I have stood the crossness of this world as long as I can, and I am going to kill myself. You are the only person in the world to whom I wish to say good-bye." Miss Porter looked her dispassionately in the eye and responded, "Elinor, it was good of you to think of me. Good-bye." Here was a woman seeking sympathy, but she got apathy, with a tinge of antipathy. The fact is, just as sympathy is the key to survival in life's sufferings, so apathy and antipathy are the weapons Satan uses to bring people to defeat and despair. People need a song of some sort in their life to keep on going, and the symphony of sympathy provides the music for living. It is no second rate virtue. It is agape love in action. We want to focus our attention on this paradoxical form of suffering that is a key factor in the alleviation of suffering. The first thing we want to look at is- I. THE PAIN OF SYMPATHY. It costs to care, and there are pains to pay and hurts involved in helping others bear their burdens. Our text describes Christians who stand along side other Christians who were being insulted and persecuted. They sympathized with Christians who were imprisoned, and when you stand along side of people who are being rejected, you too will be rejected, and they were, and they suffered the loss of their property because they identified with those who suffered. Someone defined sympathy as, "Your pain in my heart." William Stidger tells of seeing a group of boys and girls in his home town gathered around a friend on the ground. He walked over
  • 33. and saw this young boy doubled over and weeping with pain. He asked one of the children what the problem was, and the girl replied, "We've all got a pain in Jimmy's stomach." This was sympathy, and she was feeling the pain right along with the suffering friend. Benjamin Franklin had sympathy for the Indians in a day when it was costly to care for Indians. On Dec. 14, 1763, 57 white vigilantes raided a peaceable settlement of one of the Indian tribes and killed 6 of the 20 Indians there. Two weeks later over 200 vigilantes raided the jail where the other 14 were being kept in protective custody, and they broke the door down and killed the Indians. Franklin was outraged, and called for the punishment of these white savages. He raised a militia of almost 1000 men, and rode out to prevent their next strike. He succeeded in saving 140 Indian lives. But his sympathy for the Indians cost him dearly, and he was defeated that year for reelection to the Colonial Assembly of Pennsylvania. Sympathy is a choice as to what you will suffer for, and everybody suffers for something. Will you suffer for the prejudice and bigotry of antipathy by adding to the suffering of others? Will you suffer the judgment of apathy by having no feelings toward the suffering of others? Or will you suffer the pain of sympathy, because you choose to identify with, and stand along side of, others as they suffer? The first two are Satan-like and fallen humanity-like. Only the third choice is Christ-like. Jesus was tempted in all points like as we are, but without sin. He entered into flesh and lived on our level, and He knows by experience what the battle of life is all about. Heb. 4:15 says, "For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses..." He can stand along side and suffer with us, because He has been there, and He knows what it is to be weak and to suffer. It was painful for Him, but profitable for us that Jesus entered the limitations of the flesh, for we now have a Sympathizing Savior. This is where we see the value of much suffering in this fallen world. All suffering becomes good suffering that leads you to sympathize with others in their suffering. Allen Gregg of the Rockefeller Fund said, he hated to see a medical student get his MD degree before he had been a patient in the hospital. "I'd like to put every intern through an appendectomy at least. Not for the surgical experience, but to learn how the average patient is treated." So also, every lawyer who has not been through a court case has little notion of what his clients suffer. It is not enough to walk a mile in someone else's moccasin says Sidney Harris. He says, "They have to pinch enough, long enough for the blister to be remembered when the shoe is on the other foot." In other words, all caregivers need to experience suffering to some degree to be able to enter into the pain of sympathy. This is vital to the helping of others bear their burdens. We do not know why the Good Samaritan was so sympathetic toward a stranger who was beaten and robbed. Possibly he had been there himself, and had been attacked on a previous journey. Whatever the case, he was the hero of the story because he was willing to voluntarily suffer the pains of sympathy. The priest