Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Biondic n zrnovnica

•Download as PPTX, PDF•
•
G
groundwatercop

This document summarizes a study that developed a new karst aquifer vulnerability assessment (KAVA) method and applied it to the Novljanska Žrnovnica spring catchment area in Croatia. The study evaluated several existing vulnerability mapping methods (PI, COP, SINTACS, COST 620) and identified limitations when applying them to Dinaric karst regions. The KAVA method was created using four factors - overlay protection, precipitation influence, infiltration conditions, and aquifer conditions. Maps of source and resource vulnerability were produced for the catchment area using the new KAVA method. The study concluded the KAVA method provides a more realistic assessment of karst aquifer vulnerability compared to other methods and

Related slideshows

Transient Modelling of Groundwater Flow, Application to Tunnel Dewatering
Transient Modelling of Groundwater Flow, Application to Tunnel DewateringTransient Modelling of Groundwater Flow, Application to Tunnel Dewatering
Transient Modelling of Groundwater Flow, Application to Tunnel Dewatering
 
Integrated Modelling as a Tool for Assessing Groundwater Sustainability under...
Integrated Modelling as a Tool for Assessing Groundwater Sustainability under...Integrated Modelling as a Tool for Assessing Groundwater Sustainability under...
Integrated Modelling as a Tool for Assessing Groundwater Sustainability under...
 
Integrated Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Modelling using GSFLOW
Integrated Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Modelling using GSFLOWIntegrated Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Modelling using GSFLOW
Integrated Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction Modelling using GSFLOW
 
1 of 20
Vulnerability mapping of the Novljanska Žrnovnica karstic spring catchment area in Croatia assoc.prof.dr.sc. Ranko Biondić assist.prof.dr.sc. Hrvoje Meaški prof. emeritus Božidar Biondić dr.sc. Jelena Loborec University of Zagreb, Croatia Faculty of Geotechnical Engineering
Novljanska Žrnovnica spring • one of the largest coastal karst spring zone in Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea – The catchment area with the size over 1000 km2 • Captured for water- supply of a touristic zone (250 L/s) – no alternative • Discharge of spring varies from 10 m3/s in rain season to about 500 l/s in the dry season 2
• main aquifer is built of well permeable carbonate rocks • very well researched area – lots of tracing tests, geological & hydrogeological maps • typical catchment for the Dinaric karst region – surface flow – Gacka & Lika rivers – ponors  groundwater flow – groundwater depth up to few hundreds meters – discharging on coastal springs – coastal springs permanently or temporary with problem of salinization – touristic zone – raising demands for the water-supply • lots of springs in rain season, but in dry season discharge decreasing and only Novljanska Žrnovnica remains for usage in water-supply ponor of Gacka River 3
Contents of the project • Vulnerability mapping of the Novljanska Žrnovnica karstic spring catchment area by the well-known methods: – the PI method (Goldscheider, 2002; Goldscheider et al., 2002) – the COP method (Vias et al., 2002) – the SINTACS method (Civita & De Maio, 2000) – the COST 620 project methodology (ed. Zwahlen, 2004) • Using the experiences collected through the work with those four methods, the new method appropriate for the Dinaric karst terrains is developed – KAVA method – Karst Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment method 4
The PI method • two main factors: – Protective cover (P) • factor R (recharge) • factor T (topsoil) • factor S (subsoil) • factor B (bedrock) – factor L (lithology) – factor F (fracturing) – B=L*F • factor A (Artesian pressure) • factor M (thickness of each stratum) – Infiltration condition (I) • factor I’ (depth to low permeability layer; slope) • SCM (surface catchment map – a, b, c, d, e types) 5
the PI map – some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • many subfactors of factor P (cover soils) – need for very detail researches • maximum recharge in tables is > 400 mm/year  in Dinaric karst > 3500 mm/year ?? • subfactor F (fracturing) - epikarst zones with F=0 totally eliminates the protective role of unsaturated zone • flow conditions in the covering layers – very complex parameters scheme 6
The COP method • factor C (Flow concentration) – distance to the sinking zone (db) – distance to the streams that sink (ds) – slope & vegetation conditions (sv) – surface karst features (sf) • factor O (Overlaying layers) – soils (Os) – lithology (Ol) • factor P (Precipitation) – precipitation quantity (Pq) – precipitation intensity (Pi) 7
the COP map – some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • Intrinsic vulnerability of the aquifer – not for the springs • assessment of concentrated infiltration - zones around ponors and streams that sink  too big buffers • advantage  assessment of the diffuse infiltration of surface waters 8
The SINTACS method • S1 – depth to groundwater • I – effective infiltration • N – unsaturated zone attenuation capacity • T – soil/overburden attenuating capacity • A – hydrogeological characterization of the aquifer • C – hydraulic characterization of the aquifer • S2 – hydrological role of the topographic slope • due to the SINTACTS R5 weighted strings  the catchment is in the scenario #4 – karst – deep karstified terrain 9
the SINTACS map – some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • Aquifer intrinsic vulnerability – could be used for the vulnerability of springs with minor modifications • At the first sight seems very complex, but it is obvious how each parameter is strictly defined and described in details  no need to define additional parameters 10
COST 620 - some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • Resource and source vulnerability map – Resource – the same as the COP map – Source – additional factor K – karst network development • the European approach doesn’t offer some specific guidance for different subfactors, already recommends determination of different parameters 11 SOURCE VULNERABILITY MAP
The KAVA method • Karst Aquifers Vulnerability Assessment (KAVA) • based on four basic factors: – Overlay protection (O factor) – Precipitation influence (P factor) – Infiltration conditions (I factor) – Aquifer conditions (A factor) 12
Overlay protection (O factor) • subfactor Os (soils) – protective role of covering soil – proposed by COP method; in KAVA method slightly simplified because the Dinaric karst catchments are mostly without cover deposits • subfactor Okf (karst features) – defines impacts of epikarst zones – number of doline per km2 13
Precipitation influence (P factor) • subfactor Pe (effective precipitation) – can be obtained from previous researches, meteorological maps, many empirical formulas (Keller, Srebrenović, Žugaj) • subfactor Pi (Precipitation intensity) – from data about mean annual rainfall and the total number of rainy days in the catchment area 14
Surface Catchment Areas (SCA) 15
Infiltration conditions (I factor) • Isv subfactor (slope & vegetation) – slope parameter from the DEM – vegetation from the Corine Land Cover map – SCA1 – area of the greatest vulnerability – SCA2 & SCA3 – according to the table • Igwd subfactor (depth to groundwater) 16
Aquifer condition (A factor) • Ahg subfactor (hydrogeological function of the rocks and deposits) • Att subfactor (tracing tests) – only the tracing test performed during the rain period 17
Source and Resource Vulnerability Maps • SV index – refers to the assessment of the intrinsic vulnerability of karst springs – applied subfactor with tracing tests • RSV index - refers to the assessment of the intrinsic vulnerability of karst aquifer 18 Extreme Very High High Moderate Low Extreme Very High High Moderate Low Very low
Conclusion • all methods, including the KAVA method, were tested on the example of the karst catchment area of the Novljanska Žrnovnica spring, wich was selected as a typical catchment of the Dinaric karst region • That’s the good base for renewing of delineation of the protection zones of the Novljanska Žrnovnica catchment area • The KAVA method is developed with goal to in more realistic way present the intrinsic vulnerability of karst aquifers such as Dinaric karst aquifers, and we believe that the KAVA method will find its application in similar karst areas in the Mediterranean region 19
Thank you for your attention Merci pour votre attention ‫النتباهكم‬ ً‫ا‬‫شكر‬

More Related Content

Biondic n zrnovnica

  • 1. Vulnerability mapping of the Novljanska Žrnovnica karstic spring catchment area in Croatia assoc.prof.dr.sc. Ranko Biondić assist.prof.dr.sc. Hrvoje Meaški prof. emeritus Božidar Biondić dr.sc. Jelena Loborec University of Zagreb, Croatia Faculty of Geotechnical Engineering
  • 2. Novljanska Žrnovnica spring • one of the largest coastal karst spring zone in Croatian part of the Adriatic Sea – The catchment area with the size over 1000 km2 • Captured for water- supply of a touristic zone (250 L/s) – no alternative • Discharge of spring varies from 10 m3/s in rain season to about 500 l/s in the dry season 2
  • 3. • main aquifer is built of well permeable carbonate rocks • very well researched area – lots of tracing tests, geological & hydrogeological maps • typical catchment for the Dinaric karst region – surface flow – Gacka & Lika rivers – ponors  groundwater flow – groundwater depth up to few hundreds meters – discharging on coastal springs – coastal springs permanently or temporary with problem of salinization – touristic zone – raising demands for the water-supply • lots of springs in rain season, but in dry season discharge decreasing and only Novljanska Žrnovnica remains for usage in water-supply ponor of Gacka River 3
  • 4. Contents of the project • Vulnerability mapping of the Novljanska Žrnovnica karstic spring catchment area by the well-known methods: – the PI method (Goldscheider, 2002; Goldscheider et al., 2002) – the COP method (Vias et al., 2002) – the SINTACS method (Civita & De Maio, 2000) – the COST 620 project methodology (ed. Zwahlen, 2004) • Using the experiences collected through the work with those four methods, the new method appropriate for the Dinaric karst terrains is developed – KAVA method – Karst Aquifer Vulnerability Assessment method 4
  • 5. The PI method • two main factors: – Protective cover (P) • factor R (recharge) • factor T (topsoil) • factor S (subsoil) • factor B (bedrock) – factor L (lithology) – factor F (fracturing) – B=L*F • factor A (Artesian pressure) • factor M (thickness of each stratum) – Infiltration condition (I) • factor I’ (depth to low permeability layer; slope) • SCM (surface catchment map – a, b, c, d, e types) 5
  • 6. the PI map – some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • many subfactors of factor P (cover soils) – need for very detail researches • maximum recharge in tables is > 400 mm/year  in Dinaric karst > 3500 mm/year ?? • subfactor F (fracturing) - epikarst zones with F=0 totally eliminates the protective role of unsaturated zone • flow conditions in the covering layers – very complex parameters scheme 6
  • 7. The COP method • factor C (Flow concentration) – distance to the sinking zone (db) – distance to the streams that sink (ds) – slope & vegetation conditions (sv) – surface karst features (sf) • factor O (Overlaying layers) – soils (Os) – lithology (Ol) • factor P (Precipitation) – precipitation quantity (Pq) – precipitation intensity (Pi) 7
  • 8. the COP map – some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • Intrinsic vulnerability of the aquifer – not for the springs • assessment of concentrated infiltration - zones around ponors and streams that sink  too big buffers • advantage  assessment of the diffuse infiltration of surface waters 8
  • 9. The SINTACS method • S1 – depth to groundwater • I – effective infiltration • N – unsaturated zone attenuation capacity • T – soil/overburden attenuating capacity • A – hydrogeological characterization of the aquifer • C – hydraulic characterization of the aquifer • S2 – hydrological role of the topographic slope • due to the SINTACTS R5 weighted strings  the catchment is in the scenario #4 – karst – deep karstified terrain 9
  • 10. the SINTACS map – some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • Aquifer intrinsic vulnerability – could be used for the vulnerability of springs with minor modifications • At the first sight seems very complex, but it is obvious how each parameter is strictly defined and described in details  no need to define additional parameters 10
  • 11. COST 620 - some conclusions after the usage in the Dinaric karst aquifer • Resource and source vulnerability map – Resource – the same as the COP map – Source – additional factor K – karst network development • the European approach doesn’t offer some specific guidance for different subfactors, already recommends determination of different parameters 11 SOURCE VULNERABILITY MAP
  • 12. The KAVA method • Karst Aquifers Vulnerability Assessment (KAVA) • based on four basic factors: – Overlay protection (O factor) – Precipitation influence (P factor) – Infiltration conditions (I factor) – Aquifer conditions (A factor) 12
  • 13. Overlay protection (O factor) • subfactor Os (soils) – protective role of covering soil – proposed by COP method; in KAVA method slightly simplified because the Dinaric karst catchments are mostly without cover deposits • subfactor Okf (karst features) – defines impacts of epikarst zones – number of doline per km2 13
  • 14. Precipitation influence (P factor) • subfactor Pe (effective precipitation) – can be obtained from previous researches, meteorological maps, many empirical formulas (Keller, Srebrenović, Žugaj) • subfactor Pi (Precipitation intensity) – from data about mean annual rainfall and the total number of rainy days in the catchment area 14
  • 16. Infiltration conditions (I factor) • Isv subfactor (slope & vegetation) – slope parameter from the DEM – vegetation from the Corine Land Cover map – SCA1 – area of the greatest vulnerability – SCA2 & SCA3 – according to the table • Igwd subfactor (depth to groundwater) 16
  • 17. Aquifer condition (A factor) • Ahg subfactor (hydrogeological function of the rocks and deposits) • Att subfactor (tracing tests) – only the tracing test performed during the rain period 17
  • 18. Source and Resource Vulnerability Maps • SV index – refers to the assessment of the intrinsic vulnerability of karst springs – applied subfactor with tracing tests • RSV index - refers to the assessment of the intrinsic vulnerability of karst aquifer 18 Extreme Very High High Moderate Low Extreme Very High High Moderate Low Very low
  • 19. Conclusion • all methods, including the KAVA method, were tested on the example of the karst catchment area of the Novljanska Žrnovnica spring, wich was selected as a typical catchment of the Dinaric karst region • That’s the good base for renewing of delineation of the protection zones of the Novljanska Žrnovnica catchment area • The KAVA method is developed with goal to in more realistic way present the intrinsic vulnerability of karst aquifers such as Dinaric karst aquifers, and we believe that the KAVA method will find its application in similar karst areas in the Mediterranean region 19
  • 20. Thank you for your attention Merci pour votre attention ‫النتباهكم‬ ً‫ا‬‫شكر‬