This document summarizes key aspects of memory management techniques discussed in Chapter 9, including paging, segmentation, and combinations of the two. Paging divides memory into fixed-size blocks called frames and logical memory into pages of the same size. It uses a page table to map logical to physical addresses. Segmentation divides a program into logical segments like functions and variables and uses a segment table to map variable-length segments to physical addresses. Combining paging and segmentation provides flexibility of segmentation with efficiency of paging.
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 54
More Related Content
Galvin-operating System(Ch9)
1. Chapter 9: Memory Management
Background
Swapping
Contiguous Allocation
Paging
Segmentation
Segmentation with Paging
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.1 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
2. Background
Program must be brought into memory and placed within
a process for it to be run.
Input queue – collection of processes on the disk that are
waiting to be brought into memory to run the program.
User programs go through several steps before being
run.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.2 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
3. Binding of Instructions and Data to
Memory
Address binding of instructions and data to memory addresses can
happen at three different stages.
Compile time: If memory location known a priori,
absolute code can be generated; must recompile code if
starting location changes.
Load time: Must generate relocatable code if memory
location is not known at compile time.
Execution time: Binding delayed until run time if the
process can be moved during its execution from one
memory segment to another. Need hardware support for
address maps (e.g., base and limit registers).
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.3 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
4. Multistep Processing of a User Program
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.4 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
5. Logical vs. Physical Address Space
The concept of a logical address space that is bound to a
separate physical address space is central to proper
memory management.
Logical address – generated by the CPU; also referred to as
virtual address.
Physical address – address seen by the memory unit.
Logical and physical addresses are the same in compile-time
and load-time address-binding schemes; logical
(virtual) and physical addresses differ in execution-time
address-binding scheme.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.5 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
6. Memory-Management Unit (MMU)
Hardware device that maps virtual to physical address.
In MMU scheme, the value in the relocation register is
added to every address generated by a user process at
the time it is sent to memory.
The user program deals with logical addresses; it never
sees the real physical addresses.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.6 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
7. Dynamic relocation using a relocation
register
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.7 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
8. Dynamic Loading
Routine is not loaded until it is called
Better memory-space utilization; unused routine is never
loaded.
Useful when large amounts of code are needed to handle
infrequently occurring cases.
No special support from the operating system is required
implemented through program design.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.8 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
9. Dynamic Linking
Linking postponed until execution time.
Small piece of code, stub, used to locate the appropriate
memory-resident library routine.
Stub replaces itself with the address of the routine, and
executes the routine.
Operating system needed to check if routine is in
processes’ memory address.
Dynamic linking is particularly useful for libraries.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.9 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
10. Overlays
Keep in memory only those instructions and data that are
needed at any given time.
Needed when process is larger than amount of memory
allocated to it.
Implemented by user, no special support needed from
operating system, programming design of overlay
structure is complex
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.10 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
11. Overlays for a Two-Pass
Assembler
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.11 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
12. Swapping
A process can be swapped temporarily out of memory to a
backing store, and then brought back into memory for continued
execution.
Backing store – fast disk large enough to accommodate copies
of all memory images for all users; must provide direct access to
these memory images.
Roll out, roll in – swapping variant used for priority-based
scheduling algorithms; lower-priority process is swapped out so
higher-priority process can be loaded and executed.
Major part of swap time is transfer time; total transfer time is
directly proportional to the amount of memory swapped.
Modified versions of swapping are found on many systems, i.e.,
UNIX, Linux, and Windows.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.12 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
13. Schematic View of Swapping
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.13 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
14. Contiguous Allocation
Main memory usually into two partitions:
Resident operating system, usually held in low memory with
interrupt vector.
User processes then held in high memory.
Single-partition allocation
Relocation-register scheme used to protect user processes
from each other, and from changing operating-system code
and data.
Relocation register contains value of smallest physical
address; limit register contains range of logical addresses –
each logical address must be less than the limit register.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.14 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
15. Hardware Support for Relocation and Limit
Registers
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.15 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
16. Contiguous Allocation (Cont.)
Multiple-partition allocation
Hole – block of available memory; holes of various size are
scattered throughout memory.
When a process arrives, it is allocated memory from a hole
large enough to accommodate it.
Operating system maintains information about:
a) allocated partitions b) free partitions (hole)
OS
process 5
process 8
process 2
OS
process 5
process 2
OS
process 5
process 9
process 2
OS
process 5
process 9
process 10
process 2
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.16 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
17. Dynamic Storage-Allocation
Problem
How to satisfy a request of size n from a list of free holes.
First-fit: Allocate the first hole that is big enough.
Best-fit: Allocate the smallest hole that is big enough;
must search entire list, unless ordered by size. Produces
the smallest leftover hole.
Worst-fit: Allocate the largest hole; must also search
entire list. Produces the largest leftover hole.
First-fit and best-fit better than worst-fit in terms of
speed and storage utilization.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.17 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
18. Fragmentation
External Fragmentation – total memory space exists
to satisfy a request, but it is not contiguous.
Internal Fragmentation – allocated memory may be
slightly larger than requested memory; this size difference
is memory internal to a partition, but not being used.
Reduce external fragmentation by compaction
Shuffle memory contents to place all free memory together
in one large block.
Compaction is possible only if relocation is dynamic, and is
done at execution time.
I/O problem
Latch job in memory while it is involved in I/O.
Do I/O only into OS buffers.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.18 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
19. Paging
Logical address space of a process can be noncontiguous;
process is allocated physical memory whenever the latter is
available.
Divide physical memory into fixed-sized blocks called frames
(size is power of 2, between 512 bytes and 8192 bytes).
Divide logical memory into blocks of same size called pages.
Keep track of all free frames.
To run a program of size n pages, need to find n free frames
and load program.
Set up a page table to translate logical to physical addresses.
Internal fragmentation.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.19 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
20. Address Translation Scheme
Address generated by CPU is divided into:
Page number (p) – used as an index into a page table which
contains base address of each page in physical memory.
Page offset (d) – combined with base address to define the
physical memory address that is sent to the memory unit.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.20 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
24. Free Frames
Before allocation After allocation
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.24 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
25. Implementation of Page Table
Page table is kept in main memory.
Page-table base register (PTBR) points to the page table.
Page-table length register (PRLR) indicates size of the
page table.
In this scheme every data/instruction access requires two
memory accesses. One for the page table and one for
the data/instruction.
The two memory access problem can be solved by the
use of a special fast-lookup hardware cache called
associative memory or translation look-aside buffers
(TLBs)
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.25 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
26. Associative Memory
Associative memory – parallel search
Page # Frame #
Address translation (A´ , A´ ´ )
If A´ is in associative register, get frame # out.
Otherwise get frame # from page table in memory
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.26 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
27. Paging Hardware With TLB
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.27 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
28. Effective Access Time
Associative Lookup = e time unit
Assume memory cycle time is 1 microsecond
Hit ratio – percentage of times that a page number is
found in the associative registers; ration related to
number of associative registers.
Hit ratio = a
Effective Access Time (EAT)
EAT = (1 + e) a + (2 + e)(1 – a)
= 2 + e – a
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.28 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
29. Memory Protection
Memory protection implemented by associating protection
bit with each frame.
Valid-invalid bit attached to each entry in the page table:
“valid” indicates that the associated page is in the process’
logical address space, and is thus a legal page.
“invalid” indicates that the page is not in the process’ logical
address space.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.29 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
30. Valid (v) or Invalid (i) Bit In A Page
Table
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.30 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
31. Page Table Structure
Hierarchical Paging
Hashed Page Tables
Inverted Page Tables
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.31 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
32. Hierarchical Page Tables
Break up the logical address space into multiple page
tables.
A simple technique is a two-level page table.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.32 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
33. Two-Level Paging Example
A logical address (on 32-bit machine with 4K page size) is
divided into:
a page number consisting of 20 bits.
a page offset consisting of 12 bits.
Since the page table is paged, the page number is further
divided into:
a 10-bit page number.
a 10-bit page offset.
Thus, a logical address is as follows:
page number page offset
pi p2 d
10 10 12
where pi is an index into the outer page table, and p2 is the
displacement within the page of the outer page table.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.33 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
35. Address-Translation Scheme
Address-translation scheme for a two-level 32-bit paging
architecture
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.35 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
36. Hashed Page Tables
Common in address spaces 32 bits.
The virtual page number is hashed into a page table. This
page table contains a chain of elements hashing to the
same location.
Virtual page numbers are compared in this chain
searching for a match. If a match is found, the
corresponding physical frame is extracted.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.36 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
37. Hashed Page Table
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.37 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
38. Inverted Page Table
One entry for each real page of memory.
Entry consists of the virtual address of the page stored in
that real memory location, with information about the
process that owns that page.
Decreases memory needed to store each page table, but
increases time needed to search the table when a page
reference occurs.
Use hash table to limit the search to one — or at most a
few — page-table entries.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.38 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
39. Inverted Page Table Architecture
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.39 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
40. Shared Pages
Shared code
One copy of read-only (reentrant) code shared among
processes (i.e., text editors, compilers, window systems).
Shared code must appear in same location in the logical
address space of all processes.
Private code and data
Each process keeps a separate copy of the code and data.
The pages for the private code and data can appear
anywhere in the logical address space.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.40 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
42. Segmentation
Memory-management scheme that supports user view of
memory.
A program is a collection of segments. A segment is a logical
unit such as:
main program,
procedure,
function,
method,
object,
local variables, global variables,
common block,
stack,
symbol table, arrays
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.42 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
43. User’s View of a Program
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.43 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
44. Logical View of Segmentation
1
3
2
4
1
4
2
3
user space physical memory space
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.44 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
45. Segmentation Architecture
Logical address consists of a two tuple:
segment-number, offset,
Segment table – maps two-dimensional physical
addresses; each table entry has:
base – contains the starting physical address where the
segments reside in memory.
limit – specifies the length of the segment.
Segment-table base register (STBR) points to the
segment table’s location in memory.
Segment-table length register (STLR) indicates number
of segments used by a program;
segment number s is legal if s STLR.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.45 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
46. Segmentation Architecture (Cont.)
Relocation.
dynamic
by segment table
Sharing.
shared segments
same segment number
Allocation.
first fit/best fit
external fragmentation
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.46 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
47. Segmentation Architecture (Cont.)
Protection. With each entry in segment table associate:
validation bit = 0 Þ illegal segment
read/write/execute privileges
Protection bits associated with segments; code sharing
occurs at segment level.
Since segments vary in length, memory allocation is a
dynamic storage-allocation problem.
A segmentation example is shown in the following
diagram
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.47 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
50. Sharing of Segments
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.50 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
51. Segmentation with Paging –
MULTICS
The MULTICS system solved problems of external
fragmentation and lengthy search times by paging the
segments.
Solution differs from pure segmentation in that the
segment-table entry contains not the base address of the
segment, but rather the base address of a page table for
this segment.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.51 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
53. Segmentation with Paging – Intel
386
As shown in the following diagram, the Intel 386 uses
segmentation with paging for memory management with a
two-level paging scheme.
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.53 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System
54. Intel 30386 Address Translation
Silberschatz, Galvin 9.54 and Gagne Ó2002 Operating System