Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Education
Chapter 2
“Imagination is more important than
knowledge.” – Albert Einstein
• Do you agree with Einstein?
• Why or why not?
“Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to
remember from time to time that nothing worth
knowing can be taught.” – Oscar Wilde
• What are the things worth knowing that can’t be taught that Wilde is
referring to?
• Can you think of a time you learned something important without
being taught it?
• If “nothing worth knowing can be taught,” then what does that say
about what we are teaching in schools?
“The greatest danger of traditional education is
that learning may remain purely verbal.” – Mirra
Komarovsky
• What does Komarovsky mean by learning being only verbal?
• Think about the classes you’ve taken. Has most of the learning you’ve
experienced in those classes been verbal?
• What activities do you enjoy doing in class? Hands-on activities?
Reading? Group discussions? Writing assignments?
• Are these activities mostly verbal, or do they use other skills?
“The true test of intelligence is not how much we
know how to do, but how we behave when we
don’t know what to do.” – John Holt
• What is Holt saying the purpose of education is?
• Hint – Holt is saying education isn’t there to teach us HOW to do
everything. If education isn’t supposed to teach us HOW to do thing,
then WHAT is it we should be learning in class?
Examining Our Own Beliefs
• Purple Card: Agree
• Pink Card: Disagree
• Be prepared to share your answer. If I don’t get “volunteers,” then I
will create “victims!” 
• Schools should abolish compulsory attendance.
• Tests are a good way to measure a student’s mastery of course
material.
• Most students’ formal education has little connection to real life.
• Most “real” learning takes place outside of school.
• Students should feel free to disagree with their teachers in class.
• Schools have many negative influences of students.
• Technology, including computers and the Internet, hurts education.
• Being an “educated” person and being an “intelligent” person are the
same thing.
“How the Web Destroys the
Quality of Students’ Research
Papers”
By David Rothenberg
Previewing the Reading
• Who is the author?
• What does the author do for a living?
• Where is the reading from?
• How old is the reading?
Read the first sentence in each paragraph.
• Can you guess what the topic of the reading is?
• Can you guess what the main idea is?
• Does Rothenberg think the internet has good or bad effects on
education?
Check the Vocabulary Footnotes
• Read through the footnotes so you know what these unfamiliar terms
mean BEFORE you come across them in the reading.
As you read:
• Make a list of Rothenberg’s major criticisms of students’ use of the
Internet in writing papers.
• Take note of (write down) any reasons you find why Rothenberg
thinks that some of the fault for his students’ papers declining in
quality is his own.
Main Idea
• In the essay “How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students’
Research Papers,” David Rothenberg maintains that…
• You have 10 minutes to write the main idea of the reading by
completing the sentence above.
• Be prepared to share your answer!
Rothenberg’s Criticisms of the Internet
• ALL research is done online (papers cite only websites, not books or journal articles)
• Much of the material cited is out of date (old)
• Students include a lot of quotations they don’t know the author of
• Sources students use may not be accurate or may be propaganda (advertisements)
• Students include graphics they cut and paste from the internet that don’t add to the
content of their paper
• It’s easy to get sidetracked and/or frustrated searching for information online
• Makes it too easy to end up with a paper that’s vague and superficial
• Since many websites don’t list authors it makes it hard to determine if something is
original or plagiarized
• Creates a decline in students’ attention spans and their ability to reason for themselves
Why is the problem Rothenberg’s fault?
• Need to teach students how to take time to understand new
language, ideas and arguments and how to blend information from
different sources together to come up with their own ideas.
• Needs to help students to learn how to determine is a source is
credible or not.
• Needs to help students gain confidence to trust their own ideas more
than what they find online.
Purpose
• PIE
• Persuade
• Inform
• Entertain
Audience
• Who does the author expect to read his work?
Rothenberg’s Purpose & Audience
• What is the major purpose of Rothenberg’s essay? What or How
does he want his readers to think or feel after finishing the selection?
• Who is Rothenberg’s audience, and how does the nature of the
audience relate to his central purpose?
• What examples can you find in the essay to support your answer?
Determining Your Reaction to the Reading
Rothenberg’s Criticisms of the Internet My Reactions
Creates a decline in students’ attention spans and
their ability to reason for themselves
I think students’ attention spans have declined;
however, I don’t think this is entirely the Internet’s
fault. TV and smart phones also play a large role in
this problem. As for reasoning, I don’t think the
Internet is capable of teaching students NOT to reason
for themselves. I think teachers don’t bother to teach
students many higher-level reasoning skills anymore.
It’s too easy to get sidetracked or frustrated looking
for information online.
Yes, you can get frustrated trying to find sources for a
research paper online. You can also get just as
frustrated trying to find sources for a research paper
in a library.
It makes it difficult to tell original work from
plagiarized ideas
I do think that pulling sources from the internet for
papers has led to an increase in plagiarisim. When no
author is given for a source, like a website, then it
makes it really easy for students to not give credit to
the mystery author for that source. If students only
use material they find in a library, they won’t have this
problem.
An Opposing View of
Rothenburg’s Article
By Richard Cummins
Director of IT Applications
Columbia Basin College
Pasco, Washington
About the Author
• Who is Cummins? What field does he work in?
• How might his field influence his thoughts on the subject?
Previewing the Reading
• Read the first sentence in each paragraph.
• Does Cummins like or dislike the Internet?
• Read through the vocabulary footnotes so you are familiar with the
terms before you come across them in the reading.
What “fallacy” does Cummins believe
Rothenberg includes in his essay?
What arguments does Cummins give for why poor
student papers are not the Internet’s fault?
• Poor course design is actually to blame.
• There are as many bad books and journal articles as bad websites.
• The Internet is just a tool – a tool can’t teach us how to not
concentrate or how to not think and reason for ourselves.
Both Rothenburg and Cummins come up with
some similar solutions to the issue of poor student
work. What are they?
Reflect
• What are your beliefs about using the Internet for school work?
• How does using the Internet affect the quality of the work you do as a
student?
• Whose argument do you agree with more – Rothenburg’s or
Cummins’? Why?
“Life in Hell”
p. 100
What is the purpose of the cartoon?
• Yes, cartoons are meant to entertain, but the author of this piece had
another purpose in mind as well.
What is the point the author is trying to make
about schools?
Essay #2
Topic
• Write a 500-600 word essay discussing both the pros (positives) and
cons (negatives) of using the Internet as an educational tool. To what
degree does using the Internet enhance students’ learning, and to
what degree does it obstruct students’ learning? Provide specific
examples to explain both your pros and your cons. Use your
discussion of the pros and cons to draw a logical, well-supported
conclusion as to whether we should or should not use the Internet as
an educational tool.
Enhance
• Transitive Verb
• heighten, increase; especially : to increase or improve in value,
quality, desirability, or attractiveness <enhanced the room with crown
molding>
Obstruct
• Transitive Verb
• to hinder from passage, action, or operation : impede <obstruct a
police investigation>
Purpose & Tone
• Purpose: To Inform
• Tone: objective, third-person point of view (do not confuse drawing a
well-supported conclusion with making an argument or giving an
opinion)
Guidelines
• 5+ Paragraphs
• 500-600 Words
• Use only Rothenberg and Cummins for outside sources
• Format essay per example on learning web
Grammar Focus
• to use the present tense to express generalizations
• to accurately switch between verb tenses within paragraphs when
appropriate (i.e. specific examples)
• to edit for subject-verb agreement and word form errors
• to use various sentence types: simple, compound, complex
• to edit for sentence structure errors (run-ons, fragments, etc.)
• to edit for pronoun errors
Vocabulary Focus
• Use any word form of ALL of the following words:
• Analysis
• Credible
• Prevalent
• Tactful
• Plagiarism
• Keep Track/Keep Track Of
• Critical Thinking
• Virtual
• Knowledge
• Response
Prewriting
• Revisit Rothenberg and Cummins to find ALL the pros and cons they
discussed.
• Make a chart (pros on one side, cons on the other).
• Add in any pros or cons you can think of that weren’t discussed by
Rothenberg or Cummins.
• Review the chart.
• Based on the pros/cons you have identified, decide whether the
evidence supports using or not using the Internet as an educational
tool. (Your conclusion)
Prewriting
• Once you have determined your conclusion, select the two BEST ideas
off your chart that SUPPORT your conclusion, and AT LEAST ONE (I
highly suggest selecting two) of the best ideas that are in opposite of
your conclusion.
• Determine the order you want to discuss these ideas to organize your
body paragraphs.
• Identify 1 or 2 specific examples to use to fully explain each idea.
Introduction Technique
• “Hook” STRATEGY: use a quotation from Rothenberg AND a quotation
from Cummins to introduce both sides of the issue and add a
transition sentence to connect the quotations to your thesis.
• Identify the quotations you want to use & add them to your outline.

More Related Content

Chapter 2 education

  • 2. “Imagination is more important than knowledge.” – Albert Einstein • Do you agree with Einstein? • Why or why not?
  • 3. “Education is an admirable thing, but it is well to remember from time to time that nothing worth knowing can be taught.” – Oscar Wilde • What are the things worth knowing that can’t be taught that Wilde is referring to? • Can you think of a time you learned something important without being taught it? • If “nothing worth knowing can be taught,” then what does that say about what we are teaching in schools?
  • 4. “The greatest danger of traditional education is that learning may remain purely verbal.” – Mirra Komarovsky • What does Komarovsky mean by learning being only verbal? • Think about the classes you’ve taken. Has most of the learning you’ve experienced in those classes been verbal? • What activities do you enjoy doing in class? Hands-on activities? Reading? Group discussions? Writing assignments? • Are these activities mostly verbal, or do they use other skills?
  • 5. “The true test of intelligence is not how much we know how to do, but how we behave when we don’t know what to do.” – John Holt • What is Holt saying the purpose of education is? • Hint – Holt is saying education isn’t there to teach us HOW to do everything. If education isn’t supposed to teach us HOW to do thing, then WHAT is it we should be learning in class?
  • 6. Examining Our Own Beliefs • Purple Card: Agree • Pink Card: Disagree • Be prepared to share your answer. If I don’t get “volunteers,” then I will create “victims!” 
  • 7. • Schools should abolish compulsory attendance.
  • 8. • Tests are a good way to measure a student’s mastery of course material.
  • 9. • Most students’ formal education has little connection to real life.
  • 10. • Most “real” learning takes place outside of school.
  • 11. • Students should feel free to disagree with their teachers in class.
  • 12. • Schools have many negative influences of students.
  • 13. • Technology, including computers and the Internet, hurts education.
  • 14. • Being an “educated” person and being an “intelligent” person are the same thing.
  • 15. “How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students’ Research Papers” By David Rothenberg
  • 16. Previewing the Reading • Who is the author? • What does the author do for a living? • Where is the reading from? • How old is the reading?
  • 17. Read the first sentence in each paragraph. • Can you guess what the topic of the reading is? • Can you guess what the main idea is? • Does Rothenberg think the internet has good or bad effects on education?
  • 18. Check the Vocabulary Footnotes • Read through the footnotes so you know what these unfamiliar terms mean BEFORE you come across them in the reading.
  • 19. As you read: • Make a list of Rothenberg’s major criticisms of students’ use of the Internet in writing papers. • Take note of (write down) any reasons you find why Rothenberg thinks that some of the fault for his students’ papers declining in quality is his own.
  • 20. Main Idea • In the essay “How the Web Destroys the Quality of Students’ Research Papers,” David Rothenberg maintains that… • You have 10 minutes to write the main idea of the reading by completing the sentence above. • Be prepared to share your answer!
  • 21. Rothenberg’s Criticisms of the Internet • ALL research is done online (papers cite only websites, not books or journal articles) • Much of the material cited is out of date (old) • Students include a lot of quotations they don’t know the author of • Sources students use may not be accurate or may be propaganda (advertisements) • Students include graphics they cut and paste from the internet that don’t add to the content of their paper • It’s easy to get sidetracked and/or frustrated searching for information online • Makes it too easy to end up with a paper that’s vague and superficial • Since many websites don’t list authors it makes it hard to determine if something is original or plagiarized • Creates a decline in students’ attention spans and their ability to reason for themselves
  • 22. Why is the problem Rothenberg’s fault? • Need to teach students how to take time to understand new language, ideas and arguments and how to blend information from different sources together to come up with their own ideas. • Needs to help students to learn how to determine is a source is credible or not. • Needs to help students gain confidence to trust their own ideas more than what they find online.
  • 23. Purpose • PIE • Persuade • Inform • Entertain
  • 24. Audience • Who does the author expect to read his work?
  • 25. Rothenberg’s Purpose & Audience • What is the major purpose of Rothenberg’s essay? What or How does he want his readers to think or feel after finishing the selection? • Who is Rothenberg’s audience, and how does the nature of the audience relate to his central purpose? • What examples can you find in the essay to support your answer?
  • 26. Determining Your Reaction to the Reading Rothenberg’s Criticisms of the Internet My Reactions Creates a decline in students’ attention spans and their ability to reason for themselves I think students’ attention spans have declined; however, I don’t think this is entirely the Internet’s fault. TV and smart phones also play a large role in this problem. As for reasoning, I don’t think the Internet is capable of teaching students NOT to reason for themselves. I think teachers don’t bother to teach students many higher-level reasoning skills anymore. It’s too easy to get sidetracked or frustrated looking for information online. Yes, you can get frustrated trying to find sources for a research paper online. You can also get just as frustrated trying to find sources for a research paper in a library. It makes it difficult to tell original work from plagiarized ideas I do think that pulling sources from the internet for papers has led to an increase in plagiarisim. When no author is given for a source, like a website, then it makes it really easy for students to not give credit to the mystery author for that source. If students only use material they find in a library, they won’t have this problem.
  • 27. An Opposing View of Rothenburg’s Article By Richard Cummins Director of IT Applications Columbia Basin College Pasco, Washington
  • 28. About the Author • Who is Cummins? What field does he work in? • How might his field influence his thoughts on the subject?
  • 29. Previewing the Reading • Read the first sentence in each paragraph. • Does Cummins like or dislike the Internet? • Read through the vocabulary footnotes so you are familiar with the terms before you come across them in the reading.
  • 30. What “fallacy” does Cummins believe Rothenberg includes in his essay?
  • 31. What arguments does Cummins give for why poor student papers are not the Internet’s fault? • Poor course design is actually to blame. • There are as many bad books and journal articles as bad websites. • The Internet is just a tool – a tool can’t teach us how to not concentrate or how to not think and reason for ourselves.
  • 32. Both Rothenburg and Cummins come up with some similar solutions to the issue of poor student work. What are they?
  • 33. Reflect • What are your beliefs about using the Internet for school work? • How does using the Internet affect the quality of the work you do as a student? • Whose argument do you agree with more – Rothenburg’s or Cummins’? Why?
  • 35. What is the purpose of the cartoon? • Yes, cartoons are meant to entertain, but the author of this piece had another purpose in mind as well.
  • 36. What is the point the author is trying to make about schools?
  • 38. Topic • Write a 500-600 word essay discussing both the pros (positives) and cons (negatives) of using the Internet as an educational tool. To what degree does using the Internet enhance students’ learning, and to what degree does it obstruct students’ learning? Provide specific examples to explain both your pros and your cons. Use your discussion of the pros and cons to draw a logical, well-supported conclusion as to whether we should or should not use the Internet as an educational tool.
  • 39. Enhance • Transitive Verb • heighten, increase; especially : to increase or improve in value, quality, desirability, or attractiveness <enhanced the room with crown molding>
  • 40. Obstruct • Transitive Verb • to hinder from passage, action, or operation : impede <obstruct a police investigation>
  • 41. Purpose & Tone • Purpose: To Inform • Tone: objective, third-person point of view (do not confuse drawing a well-supported conclusion with making an argument or giving an opinion)
  • 42. Guidelines • 5+ Paragraphs • 500-600 Words • Use only Rothenberg and Cummins for outside sources • Format essay per example on learning web
  • 43. Grammar Focus • to use the present tense to express generalizations • to accurately switch between verb tenses within paragraphs when appropriate (i.e. specific examples) • to edit for subject-verb agreement and word form errors • to use various sentence types: simple, compound, complex • to edit for sentence structure errors (run-ons, fragments, etc.) • to edit for pronoun errors
  • 44. Vocabulary Focus • Use any word form of ALL of the following words: • Analysis • Credible • Prevalent • Tactful • Plagiarism • Keep Track/Keep Track Of • Critical Thinking • Virtual • Knowledge • Response
  • 45. Prewriting • Revisit Rothenberg and Cummins to find ALL the pros and cons they discussed. • Make a chart (pros on one side, cons on the other). • Add in any pros or cons you can think of that weren’t discussed by Rothenberg or Cummins. • Review the chart. • Based on the pros/cons you have identified, decide whether the evidence supports using or not using the Internet as an educational tool. (Your conclusion)
  • 46. Prewriting • Once you have determined your conclusion, select the two BEST ideas off your chart that SUPPORT your conclusion, and AT LEAST ONE (I highly suggest selecting two) of the best ideas that are in opposite of your conclusion. • Determine the order you want to discuss these ideas to organize your body paragraphs. • Identify 1 or 2 specific examples to use to fully explain each idea.
  • 47. Introduction Technique • “Hook” STRATEGY: use a quotation from Rothenberg AND a quotation from Cummins to introduce both sides of the issue and add a transition sentence to connect the quotations to your thesis. • Identify the quotations you want to use & add them to your outline.