Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

1

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

2

COLUMBIA SPACE
SHUTTLE DISASTER

3

Presented By
• Zainab Raja
• Nazish Khalid

4

Background
Constructed in1975
First flight STS-1, April 12, 1981.
Successfully completed the orbital flight test
program - missions STS-1 through STS-4
First mission STS-5 in November, 1982
Flew 28 missions in its lifetime

5

Structure
Three main parts
Weight 2030 tons
Height 56.1 m

6

STS-107; Columbia's Last
Mission
113th mission
Columbia’s 28th mission

7

Mission Specialist David BrownCommander Rick HusbandPilot William MccoolIsraeli Payload Specialist Ilan RamonMission Specialist Laurel ClarkMission Specialist Kalpana ChawlaMission Specialist Michael Anderson

8

Take Off
Launch seemed successful
NASA officials, engineers
& the public were relieved
& happy

9

Crowds along State Road Florida, watching the space
shuttle as it lifts off from its launch pad

10

1
FLORIDA
TEXAS
January,16.
2003

11

16 DAYS MISSION
Life sciences,
Material sciences,
Fluid physics

12

1
FLORIDA
TEXAS
February,1
2003

13

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

14

CAIB
13 board members
120 staff members
400 NASA engineers
25,000 researchers
7-8 months
Examination of 30,000 documents
200+ formal interviews
3,000 general public reviews

15

Causes
Physical causes
Organizational causes

16

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

17

NASA security officers lower the American flag at Kennedy Space Center after
the shuttle's breakup.

18

Organizational Causes
The space shuttle program’s history and
culture
– Resource and budgetary constraints
– Fluctuating priorities

19

Harmful cultural traits and organizational
practices
– Reliance on past success as a substitute for
sound engineering practices
– Informal chain of command and decision-
making processes
– Barriers to effective communication

20

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

21

Possibilities
Repairing the damage on-orbit
Rescuing the crew with another shuttle
mission
Rescue option was considered
challenging but feasible

22

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

23

Reliability on past experiences
Failure of foresight
Weak risk assessment
“NASA’s problems cannot be
solved simply by retirements,
resignations, or transferring
personnel.”

24

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

25

Eliminate External Tank foam shedding
Improved imaging of the Space Shuttle
from liftoff through separation of ET
Orbiter's sustainability to minor debris
damage
Assessment of structural integrity
Shuttle flight schedule consistent with
available resources
Independent technical engineering
authority

26

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

27

History of Columbia Space Shuttle
The disaster
Causes of disaster
How it could have been avoided
Weak risk assessment
Recommendations

28

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

29

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

More Related Content

Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster

Editor's Notes

  1. ,,,,,, And
  2. Columbia Accident Investigation Board
  3. Lack of integrated management across program elements