Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Six Sigma DMAIC Project




                                            GEAE Account




                                    Project Leader/Green Belt: Mike Lisenby
                        Project Leader Title: Project Coordinator and Certified Green Belt
                                      Project Start Date: September 9, 2002

Master Black Belt: Steven Bonacorsi
Six Sigma in Action
                                                                             Dell Server Ordering
Customer Profile – Global design & production company for Aircraft Engines         Before Z_ST 1.4

Business Problem & Impact
Server replacements with Dell products had come to a halt, due to an
inability to correlate servers and components received with what was
ordered. The required cycle time of 10 days was not being met.                    Success          Defect
                                                                                    48%             52%
                                                                                 (29 Orders)
                                                                                                  (31 Orders)
Measure & Analyze
Data Collection: Cycle time was measured in days, from the date of order
to the date of delivery. The existing process sigma was negative 1.2. A
complete analysis of continuous data collected was performed. Upon
review, the customer elected to change their CTQ, causing a shift to
discrete data analysis.
                                                                                   After Z_ST 2.76
Root Causes: Lack of an identification methodology up-front in the
ordering process was identified as the root cause. Shipping distance was a                      Defect
contributor.                                                                                     10%
                                                                                                (3 Orders)

Improve & Control
Host name and/or project code of the parent server was used as a
reference on each server/component order. Orders for multiple servers
were separated into logical units.                                                 Success
                                                                                     90%
                                                                                  (26 Orders)
Results/Benefits
After the 2 month project, the customer saved US$258K, and ITS saved
$16K as a result of the improved process.


                 A Combined Savings of $275K Over 12 Months!

More Related Content

Dell Server Ordering Six Sigma Case Study

  • 1. Six Sigma DMAIC Project GEAE Account Project Leader/Green Belt: Mike Lisenby Project Leader Title: Project Coordinator and Certified Green Belt Project Start Date: September 9, 2002 Master Black Belt: Steven Bonacorsi
  • 2. Six Sigma in Action Dell Server Ordering Customer Profile – Global design & production company for Aircraft Engines Before Z_ST 1.4 Business Problem & Impact Server replacements with Dell products had come to a halt, due to an inability to correlate servers and components received with what was ordered. The required cycle time of 10 days was not being met. Success Defect 48% 52% (29 Orders) (31 Orders) Measure & Analyze Data Collection: Cycle time was measured in days, from the date of order to the date of delivery. The existing process sigma was negative 1.2. A complete analysis of continuous data collected was performed. Upon review, the customer elected to change their CTQ, causing a shift to discrete data analysis. After Z_ST 2.76 Root Causes: Lack of an identification methodology up-front in the ordering process was identified as the root cause. Shipping distance was a Defect contributor. 10% (3 Orders) Improve & Control Host name and/or project code of the parent server was used as a reference on each server/component order. Orders for multiple servers were separated into logical units. Success 90% (26 Orders) Results/Benefits After the 2 month project, the customer saved US$258K, and ITS saved $16K as a result of the improved process. A Combined Savings of $275K Over 12 Months!