Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Developmental dysplasiahip

•Download as PPT, PDF•
•

This document discusses developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), including: - The normal development of the hip joint and how DDH disrupts this. - Risk factors for DDH including genetic, intrauterine, and clinical factors. - Methods for diagnosing DDH including physical exam, ultrasound, and x-rays. - Treatment options for DDH including the Pavlik harness, which is preferred as it allows reduction through flexion and abduction while preventing extension and adduction. Proper positioning and compliance are important for the Pavlik harness to be successful.

1 of 60

1

Developmental dysplasiahip

2

 Previously known as congenital dislocation of the hip implying a condition that existed at birth  developmental encompasses embryonic, fetal and infantile periods  includes congenital dislocation and developmental hip problems including subluxation, dislocation and dysplasia

3

 Embryologically the acetabulum, femoral head develop from the same primitive mesenchymal cells  cleft develops in precartilaginous cells at 7th week and this defines both structures  11wk hip joint fully formed  acetabular growth continues throughout intrauterine life with development of labrum  birth femoral head deeply seated in acetabulum by surface tension of synovial fluid and very difficult to dislocate  in DDH this shape and tension is abnormal in addition to capsular laxity

4

 The cartilage complex is 3D with triradiate medially and cup-shaped laterally  interposed between ilium above and ischium below and pubis anteriorly  acetabular cartilage forms outer 2/3 cavity and the non- articular medial wall form by triradiate cartilage which is the common physis of these three bones  fibrocartilaginous labrum forms at margin of acetabular cartilage and joint capsule inserts just above its rim

5

 articular cartilage covers portion articulating with femoral head opposite side is a growth plate with degenerating cells facing towards the pelvic bone it opposes  triradiate cartilage is triphalanged with each side of each limb having a growth plate which allows interstitial growth within the cartilage causing expansion of hip joint diameter during growth  In the infant the greater trochanter, proximal femur and intertrochanteric portion is cartilage  4-7 months proximal ossification center appears which enlarges along cartilaginous anlage until adult life when only thin layer of articular cartilage persists

6

Developmental dysplasiahip

7

Developmental dysplasiahip

8

 Experimental studies in humans with unreduced hips suggest the main stimulus for concave shape of the acetabulum is presence of spherical head  for normal depth of acetabulum to increase several factors play a role  spherical femoral head  normal appositional growth within cartilage  periosteal new bone formation in adjacent pelvic bones  development of three secondary ossification centers  normal growth and development occur through balanced growth of proximal femur, acetabulum and triradiate cartilages and the adjacent bones

9

 Tight fit between head and acetabulum is absent and head can glide in and out of acetabulum  hypertrophied ridge of acetabular cartilage in superior, posterior and inferior aspects of acetabulum called “ neolimbus”  often a trough or grove in this cartilage due to pressure from femoral head or neck  98% DDH that occur around or at birth have these changes and are reversible in the newborn  2% newborns with teratologic or antenatal dislocations and no syndrome have these changes

10

Developmental dysplasiahip

11

 Development in treated DDH different from normal hip  goal is to reduce the femoral head asap to provide the stimulus for acetabular development  if concentric reduction is maintained potential for recovery and resumption of normal growth  age at which DDH hip can still return to normal is controversial depends on  age at reduction  growth potential of acetabulum  damage to acetabulum from head or during reduction  accessory centers seen in 2-3% normal hips however in treated DDH seen up to 60% appearing ages 6 months to 10 years ( should look for these on radiographs to indicate continued growth)

12

 1 in 100 newborns examined have evidence of instability ( positive Barlow or Ortolani)  1 in 1000 live births true dislocation  most detectable at birth in nursery  Barlow stated that 60% stabilize in 1st week and 88% stabilize in first 2 months without treatment remaining 12% true dislocations and persist without treatment  Coleman26% become dislocated, 13% partial contact 39% located but dysplatic features 22% normal

13

 Genetic and ethnic  increased native Americans but very low in southern Chinese and Africans  positive family history 12-33%  10x risk if affected parent, 7X if sibling  intrauterine factors  breech position ( normal pop’n 2-4% , DDH 17-23% )  oligohydroamnios  neuromuscular conditions like myelomeningocele  high association with intrauterine molding abnormalities including metatarsus adductus and torticollis  first born  female baby ( 80% cases)  left hip more common

14

 Clinical risk factors  Physical exam  Ortolani Test  hip flexion and abduction , trochanter elevated and femoral head glides into acetabulum  Barlow Test  provocative test where hip flexed and adducted and head palpated to exit the acetabulum partially or completely over a rim  some base there treatment on whether ortolani+ versus Barlow+ feeling Barlow + more stable  Lovell and Winter make no distinction  2% extreme complete irreducible teratologic disloactions assoc with other conditions like arthrogyposis

15

Developmental dysplasiahip

16

 Secondary adaptive changes occur  limitation of abduction due to adductor longus shortening  Galleazi sign  flex both hips and one side shows apparent femoral shortening  asymmetry gluteal, thigh or labial folds  limb-length inequailty  waddling gait and hyperlordosis in bilateral cases

17

Developmental dysplasiahip

18

Developmental dysplasiahip

19

 Ultra sound  morphologic assessment and dynamic  anatomical characteristics  alpha angle: slope of superior aspect bony acetabulum  beta angle: cartilaginous component (problems with inter and intraobserver error )  dynamic  observe what occurs with Barlow and ortolani testing  indications controversial due to high levels of overdiagnosis and not currently recommended as a routine screening tool other than in high risk patients  best indication is to assess treatment  guided reduction of dislocated hip or check reduction and stability during Pavlik harness treatment

20

 newborn period DDH not a radiographic diagnosis and should be made by clinical exam  after newborn period diagnosis should be confirmed by xray  several measurements  treatment decisions should be based on changes in measurements

21

 classic features increased acetabular index ( n=27, >30-35 dysplasia) disruption shenton line ( after age 3-4 should be intact on all views) absent tear drop sign delayed appearance ossific nucleus and decreased femoral head coverage failure medial metaphyseal beak of proximal femur , secondary ossification center to be located in lower inner quadrant center-edge angle useful after age 5 ( < 20) when can see ossific nucleus

22

Pe

23

Developmental dysplasiahip

24

 Barlow  1 in 60 infants have instability ( positive Barlow)  60% stabilize in 1st week  88% stabilize in 2 months without treatment  12 % become true dislocations and persist  Coleman  23 hips < 3 months  26% became dislocated  13 % partial contact with acetabulum  39% located but dysplastic feature  22% normal  because not possible to predict outcome all infants with instability should be treated

25

 Variable  depends on 2 factors  well developed false acetabulum ( 24 % chance good result vs 52 % if absent)  bilaterality  in absence of false acetabulum patients maintain good ROM with little disability  femoral head covered with thick elongated capsule  false acetabulum increases chances degenerative joint disease  hyperlordosis of lumbar spine assoc with back pain  unilateral dislocation has problems  leg length inequality, knee deformity , scoliosis and gait disturbance

26

Developmental dysplasiahip

27

Developmental dysplasiahip

28

Developmental dysplasiahip

29

 Dysplasia (anatomic and radiographic def’n)  inadequate dev of acetabulum, femoral head or both  all subluxated hips are anatomically dysplastic  radiologically difference between subluxated and dysplastic hip is disruption of Shenton’s line  subluxation: line disrupted, head is superiorly, superolaterally ar laterally displaced from the medial wall  dysplasia: line is intact  important because natural history is different

30

Developmental dysplasiahip

31

 Subluxation predictably leads to degenerative joint disease and clinical disability  mean age symptom onset 36.6 in females and 54 in men  severe xray changes 46 in female and 69 in males  Cooperman  32 hips with CE angle < 20 without subluxation  22 years all had xray evidence of DJD  no correlation between angle and rate of development  concluded that radiologically apparent dysplasia leads to DJD but process takes decades

32

 Goal is obtain reduction and maintain reduction to provide optimal env’t for femoral head and acetabular development  Lovell and Winter  treatment initiated immediately on diagnosis  AAOS (July,2000)  subluxation often corrects after 3 weeks and may be observed without treatment  if persists on clinical exam or US beyond 3 weeks treatment indicated  actual dislocation diagosed at birth treatment should be immediate

33

 Pavlik Harness preferred  prevents hip extension and adduction but allows flexion and abduction which lead to reduction and stabilization  success 95% if maintained full time six weeks  > 6 months success < 50% as difficult to maintain active child in harness

34

 Chest strap at nipple line  shoulder straps set to hold cross strap at this level  anterior strap flexes hip 100-110 degrees  posterior strap prevents adduction and allow comfortable abduction  safe zone arc of abduction and adduction that is between redislocation and comfortable unforced abduction

35

 Indications include presence of reducible hip femoral head directed toward triradiate cartilage on xray  follow weekly intervals by clinical exam and US for two weeks if not reduced other methods pursued  once successfully reduced harness continued for childs age at stability + 3 months  worn full time for half interval if stability continues and then weaned off  end of weaning process xray pelvis obtained and if normal discontinue harness

36

 Failure  poor compliance , inaccurate position and persistence of inadequate treatment ( > 2-3- weeks)  subgroup where failure may be predictable Viere et al  absent Ortolani sign  bilateral dislocations  treatment commenced after age 7 week Treatment closed reduction and Spica Casting  Femoral Nerve Compression 2 to hyperflexion  Inferior Dislocation  Skin breakdown  Avascular Necrosis

37

 Closed reduction and spica cast immobilization recommended  traction controversial with theoretical benefit of gradual stretching of soft tissues impeding reduction and neurovascular bundles to decrease AVN  skin traction preferred however vary with surgeon  usually 1-2 weeks  scientific evidence supporting this is lacking

38

 closed reduction preformed in OR under general anesthetic manipulation includes flexion, traction and abduction  percutaneous or open adductor tenotomy necessary in most cases to increase safe zone which lessen incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance  reduction must be confirmed on arthrogram as large portion of head and acetabulum are cartilaginous  dynamic arthrography helps with assessing obstacles to reduction and adequacy of reduction

39

 reduction maintained in spica cast well molded to greater trochanter to prevent redislocation  human position of hyperflexion and limited abduction preferred  avoid forced abduction with internal rotation as increased incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance  cast in place for 6 weeks then repeat Ct scan to confirm reduction  casting continued for 3 months at which point removed and xray done then placed in abduction orthotic device full time for 2 months then weaned

40

Developmental dysplasiahip

41

Developmental dysplasiahip

42

 Open reduction indicated if failure of closed reduction, persistent subluxation, reducible but unstable other than extremes of abduction  variety of approaches  anterior smith peterson most common  allows reduction and capsular plication and secondary procedures  disadv- > blood loss, damage iliac apophysis and abductors, stiffness

43

 greatest rate of acetabular development occurs in first 18 months after reduction

44

 medial approach ( between adductor brevis and magnus)  approach directly over site of obstacles with minimal soft tissue dissection  unable to do capsular plication so depend on cast for post op stability  anteromedial approach Ludloff ( between neurovascular bundle and pectineus)  direct exposure to obstacles, minimal muscle dissection  no plication or secondary procedures  increased incidence of damage to medial femoral circumflex artery and higher AVN risk

45

 Abduction orthotic braces commonly used until acetabular development caught up to normal side  in assessing development look for accessory ossification centers to see if cartilage in periphery has potential to ossify  secondary acetabular procedure rarely indicated < 2 years as potential for development after closed and open procedures is excellent and continues for 4-8 years  most rapid improvement measured by acetabular index , development of teardrop occurs in first 18 months after surgery

46

 Extra- articular Iliopsoas tendon adductors  Intra-articular inverted hypertrophic labrum tranverse acetabular ligament pulvinar, ligamentum teres constricted anteromedial capsule espec in late cases  neolimbus is not an obstacle to reduction and represents epiphyseal cartilage that must not be

47

 Open reduction usually necessary  age > 3 femoral shortening recommended to avoid excess pressure on head with reduction  54% AVN and 32% redislocation with use of skeletal traction in ages > 3  age > 3 recommend open reduction and femoral shortening and acetabular procedure

48

 2-3-years gray zone  potential for acetabular development diminished therefore many surgeons recommend a concomitant acetabular procedure with open reduction or 6-8 weeks after  JBJS Feb, 2002 Salter Innominate Osteotomy… Bohm,Brzuske incidence of AVN is greater with simultaneous open reduction and acetabular procedure

49

 Lovell and Winter  judge stability at time of reduction and if stable observe for period of time for development  if not developing properly with decreased acetabular index, teardrop then consider secondary procedure  most common osteotomy is Salter or Pemberton  anatomic deficiency is anterior and Salter provides this while Pemberton provides anterior and lateral coverage

50

 Goal of treatment is to have radiographically normal hip at maturity to prevent DJD  after reduction achieved potential for development continues until age 4 after which potential decreases  child < 4 minimal dysplasia may observe but if severe than subluxations and residual dysplasias shoild be corrected  when evaluating persistent dysplasia look at femur and acetabulum  DDH deficiency usually acetabular side

51

 plain xray with measurement of CE angle and acetabular index  young children deficiency anterior and adolescents can be global  deformities of femoral neck significant if lead to subluxation  lateral subluxation with extreme coxa valga or anterior subluxation with excessive anteversion ( defined on CT )  usually DDH patients have a normal neck shaft angle

52

 Dysplasia for 2-3-years after reduction proximal femoral derotation or varus osteotomy should be considered if excessive anteversion or valgus  prior to performing these be sure head can be concentrically reduced on AP view with leg abducted 30 and internally rotated  varus osteotomy done to redirect head to center of acetabulum to stimulate normal development  must be done before age 4 as remodeling potential goes down after this

53

 Femoral osteotomy should only be used in conjunction with pelvic procedure as no potential for acetabular growth or remodeling but changing orientation of femur shifts the weightbearing portion  Pelvic osteotomy considerations  age  congruent reduction  range of motion  degenerative changes

54

 Redirectional Salter ( hinges on symphysis pubis) Sutherland double innominate osteotomy Steel ( Triple osteotomy) Ganz ( rotational)  Acetabuloplasties ( decrease volume ) hinge on triradiate cartilage ( therefore immature patients) Pemberton Dega ( posterior coverage in CP patients )  Salvage depend on fibrous metaplasia of capsule shelf and Chiari

55

 Worst complication is disturbance of growth in proximal femur including the epiphysis and physeal plate  commonly referred to as AVN however, no pathology to confirm this  may be due to vascular insults to epiphysis or physeal plate or pressure injury  occurrs only in patients that have been treated and may be seen in opposite normal hip

56

 Extremes of position in abduction ( greater 60 degrees ) and abduction with internal rotation  compression on medial circumflex artery as passes the iliopsoas tendon and compression of the terminal branch between lateral neck and acetabulum  “ frog leg position “ uniformly results in proximal growth disturbance

57

 extreme position can also cause pressure necrosis onf epiphyseal cartilage and physeal plate  severin method can obtain reduction but very high incidence of necrosis  multiple classification systems with Salter most popular

58

 1 failure of appearance of ossific nucleus within 1 year of reduction2  2 failure of growth of an existing nucleus within 1 year  3 broadening of femoral neck within 1 year  4 increased xray density then fragmentation of head  5 residual deformity of head when re- ossification complete including coxa magna,vara and short neck

59

 Classified growth disturbances assoc with various degrees of physeal arrest  1 all disturbances not assoc with physis  2 lateral physeal arrest ( most common )  3 central physeal arrest  4 medial physeal arrest  longterm follow up shows that necrosis of femoral head decreases longevity of hip

60

 Femoral and/or acetabular osteotomy to maintain reduction and shift areas of pressure  trochanteric overgrowth causing an abductor lurch treated with greater trochanter physeal arrest if done before age 8 otherwise distal transfer  early detection is key with 95% success rate of treatment  identify growth disturbance lines

More Related Content

Developmental dysplasiahip

  • 2.  Previously known as congenital dislocation of the hip implying a condition that existed at birth  developmental encompasses embryonic, fetal and infantile periods  includes congenital dislocation and developmental hip problems including subluxation, dislocation and dysplasia
  • 3.  Embryologically the acetabulum, femoral head develop from the same primitive mesenchymal cells  cleft develops in precartilaginous cells at 7th week and this defines both structures  11wk hip joint fully formed  acetabular growth continues throughout intrauterine life with development of labrum  birth femoral head deeply seated in acetabulum by surface tension of synovial fluid and very difficult to dislocate  in DDH this shape and tension is abnormal in addition to capsular laxity
  • 4.  The cartilage complex is 3D with triradiate medially and cup-shaped laterally  interposed between ilium above and ischium below and pubis anteriorly  acetabular cartilage forms outer 2/3 cavity and the non- articular medial wall form by triradiate cartilage which is the common physis of these three bones  fibrocartilaginous labrum forms at margin of acetabular cartilage and joint capsule inserts just above its rim
  • 5.  articular cartilage covers portion articulating with femoral head opposite side is a growth plate with degenerating cells facing towards the pelvic bone it opposes  triradiate cartilage is triphalanged with each side of each limb having a growth plate which allows interstitial growth within the cartilage causing expansion of hip joint diameter during growth  In the infant the greater trochanter, proximal femur and intertrochanteric portion is cartilage  4-7 months proximal ossification center appears which enlarges along cartilaginous anlage until adult life when only thin layer of articular cartilage persists
  • 8.  Experimental studies in humans with unreduced hips suggest the main stimulus for concave shape of the acetabulum is presence of spherical head  for normal depth of acetabulum to increase several factors play a role  spherical femoral head  normal appositional growth within cartilage  periosteal new bone formation in adjacent pelvic bones  development of three secondary ossification centers  normal growth and development occur through balanced growth of proximal femur, acetabulum and triradiate cartilages and the adjacent bones
  • 9.  Tight fit between head and acetabulum is absent and head can glide in and out of acetabulum  hypertrophied ridge of acetabular cartilage in superior, posterior and inferior aspects of acetabulum called “ neolimbus”  often a trough or grove in this cartilage due to pressure from femoral head or neck  98% DDH that occur around or at birth have these changes and are reversible in the newborn  2% newborns with teratologic or antenatal dislocations and no syndrome have these changes
  • 11.  Development in treated DDH different from normal hip  goal is to reduce the femoral head asap to provide the stimulus for acetabular development  if concentric reduction is maintained potential for recovery and resumption of normal growth  age at which DDH hip can still return to normal is controversial depends on  age at reduction  growth potential of acetabulum  damage to acetabulum from head or during reduction  accessory centers seen in 2-3% normal hips however in treated DDH seen up to 60% appearing ages 6 months to 10 years ( should look for these on radiographs to indicate continued growth)
  • 12.  1 in 100 newborns examined have evidence of instability ( positive Barlow or Ortolani)  1 in 1000 live births true dislocation  most detectable at birth in nursery  Barlow stated that 60% stabilize in 1st week and 88% stabilize in first 2 months without treatment remaining 12% true dislocations and persist without treatment  Coleman26% become dislocated, 13% partial contact 39% located but dysplatic features 22% normal
  • 13.  Genetic and ethnic  increased native Americans but very low in southern Chinese and Africans  positive family history 12-33%  10x risk if affected parent, 7X if sibling  intrauterine factors  breech position ( normal pop’n 2-4% , DDH 17-23% )  oligohydroamnios  neuromuscular conditions like myelomeningocele  high association with intrauterine molding abnormalities including metatarsus adductus and torticollis  first born  female baby ( 80% cases)  left hip more common
  • 14.  Clinical risk factors  Physical exam  Ortolani Test  hip flexion and abduction , trochanter elevated and femoral head glides into acetabulum  Barlow Test  provocative test where hip flexed and adducted and head palpated to exit the acetabulum partially or completely over a rim  some base there treatment on whether ortolani+ versus Barlow+ feeling Barlow + more stable  Lovell and Winter make no distinction  2% extreme complete irreducible teratologic disloactions assoc with other conditions like arthrogyposis
  • 16.  Secondary adaptive changes occur  limitation of abduction due to adductor longus shortening  Galleazi sign  flex both hips and one side shows apparent femoral shortening  asymmetry gluteal, thigh or labial folds  limb-length inequailty  waddling gait and hyperlordosis in bilateral cases
  • 19.  Ultra sound  morphologic assessment and dynamic  anatomical characteristics  alpha angle: slope of superior aspect bony acetabulum  beta angle: cartilaginous component (problems with inter and intraobserver error )  dynamic  observe what occurs with Barlow and ortolani testing  indications controversial due to high levels of overdiagnosis and not currently recommended as a routine screening tool other than in high risk patients  best indication is to assess treatment  guided reduction of dislocated hip or check reduction and stability during Pavlik harness treatment
  • 20.  newborn period DDH not a radiographic diagnosis and should be made by clinical exam  after newborn period diagnosis should be confirmed by xray  several measurements  treatment decisions should be based on changes in measurements
  • 21.  classic features increased acetabular index ( n=27, >30-35 dysplasia) disruption shenton line ( after age 3-4 should be intact on all views) absent tear drop sign delayed appearance ossific nucleus and decreased femoral head coverage failure medial metaphyseal beak of proximal femur , secondary ossification center to be located in lower inner quadrant center-edge angle useful after age 5 ( < 20) when can see ossific nucleus
  • 22. Pe
  • 24.  Barlow  1 in 60 infants have instability ( positive Barlow)  60% stabilize in 1st week  88% stabilize in 2 months without treatment  12 % become true dislocations and persist  Coleman  23 hips < 3 months  26% became dislocated  13 % partial contact with acetabulum  39% located but dysplastic feature  22% normal  because not possible to predict outcome all infants with instability should be treated
  • 25.  Variable  depends on 2 factors  well developed false acetabulum ( 24 % chance good result vs 52 % if absent)  bilaterality  in absence of false acetabulum patients maintain good ROM with little disability  femoral head covered with thick elongated capsule  false acetabulum increases chances degenerative joint disease  hyperlordosis of lumbar spine assoc with back pain  unilateral dislocation has problems  leg length inequality, knee deformity , scoliosis and gait disturbance
  • 29.  Dysplasia (anatomic and radiographic def’n)  inadequate dev of acetabulum, femoral head or both  all subluxated hips are anatomically dysplastic  radiologically difference between subluxated and dysplastic hip is disruption of Shenton’s line  subluxation: line disrupted, head is superiorly, superolaterally ar laterally displaced from the medial wall  dysplasia: line is intact  important because natural history is different
  • 31.  Subluxation predictably leads to degenerative joint disease and clinical disability  mean age symptom onset 36.6 in females and 54 in men  severe xray changes 46 in female and 69 in males  Cooperman  32 hips with CE angle < 20 without subluxation  22 years all had xray evidence of DJD  no correlation between angle and rate of development  concluded that radiologically apparent dysplasia leads to DJD but process takes decades
  • 32.  Goal is obtain reduction and maintain reduction to provide optimal env’t for femoral head and acetabular development  Lovell and Winter  treatment initiated immediately on diagnosis  AAOS (July,2000)  subluxation often corrects after 3 weeks and may be observed without treatment  if persists on clinical exam or US beyond 3 weeks treatment indicated  actual dislocation diagosed at birth treatment should be immediate
  • 33.  Pavlik Harness preferred  prevents hip extension and adduction but allows flexion and abduction which lead to reduction and stabilization  success 95% if maintained full time six weeks  > 6 months success < 50% as difficult to maintain active child in harness
  • 34.  Chest strap at nipple line  shoulder straps set to hold cross strap at this level  anterior strap flexes hip 100-110 degrees  posterior strap prevents adduction and allow comfortable abduction  safe zone arc of abduction and adduction that is between redislocation and comfortable unforced abduction
  • 35.  Indications include presence of reducible hip femoral head directed toward triradiate cartilage on xray  follow weekly intervals by clinical exam and US for two weeks if not reduced other methods pursued  once successfully reduced harness continued for childs age at stability + 3 months  worn full time for half interval if stability continues and then weaned off  end of weaning process xray pelvis obtained and if normal discontinue harness
  • 36.  Failure  poor compliance , inaccurate position and persistence of inadequate treatment ( > 2-3- weeks)  subgroup where failure may be predictable Viere et al  absent Ortolani sign  bilateral dislocations  treatment commenced after age 7 week Treatment closed reduction and Spica Casting  Femoral Nerve Compression 2 to hyperflexion  Inferior Dislocation  Skin breakdown  Avascular Necrosis
  • 37.  Closed reduction and spica cast immobilization recommended  traction controversial with theoretical benefit of gradual stretching of soft tissues impeding reduction and neurovascular bundles to decrease AVN  skin traction preferred however vary with surgeon  usually 1-2 weeks  scientific evidence supporting this is lacking
  • 38.  closed reduction preformed in OR under general anesthetic manipulation includes flexion, traction and abduction  percutaneous or open adductor tenotomy necessary in most cases to increase safe zone which lessen incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance  reduction must be confirmed on arthrogram as large portion of head and acetabulum are cartilaginous  dynamic arthrography helps with assessing obstacles to reduction and adequacy of reduction
  • 39.  reduction maintained in spica cast well molded to greater trochanter to prevent redislocation  human position of hyperflexion and limited abduction preferred  avoid forced abduction with internal rotation as increased incidence of proximal femoral growth disturbance  cast in place for 6 weeks then repeat Ct scan to confirm reduction  casting continued for 3 months at which point removed and xray done then placed in abduction orthotic device full time for 2 months then weaned
  • 42.  Open reduction indicated if failure of closed reduction, persistent subluxation, reducible but unstable other than extremes of abduction  variety of approaches  anterior smith peterson most common  allows reduction and capsular plication and secondary procedures  disadv- > blood loss, damage iliac apophysis and abductors, stiffness
  • 43.  greatest rate of acetabular development occurs in first 18 months after reduction
  • 44.  medial approach ( between adductor brevis and magnus)  approach directly over site of obstacles with minimal soft tissue dissection  unable to do capsular plication so depend on cast for post op stability  anteromedial approach Ludloff ( between neurovascular bundle and pectineus)  direct exposure to obstacles, minimal muscle dissection  no plication or secondary procedures  increased incidence of damage to medial femoral circumflex artery and higher AVN risk
  • 45.  Abduction orthotic braces commonly used until acetabular development caught up to normal side  in assessing development look for accessory ossification centers to see if cartilage in periphery has potential to ossify  secondary acetabular procedure rarely indicated < 2 years as potential for development after closed and open procedures is excellent and continues for 4-8 years  most rapid improvement measured by acetabular index , development of teardrop occurs in first 18 months after surgery
  • 46.  Extra- articular Iliopsoas tendon adductors  Intra-articular inverted hypertrophic labrum tranverse acetabular ligament pulvinar, ligamentum teres constricted anteromedial capsule espec in late cases  neolimbus is not an obstacle to reduction and represents epiphyseal cartilage that must not be
  • 47.  Open reduction usually necessary  age > 3 femoral shortening recommended to avoid excess pressure on head with reduction  54% AVN and 32% redislocation with use of skeletal traction in ages > 3  age > 3 recommend open reduction and femoral shortening and acetabular procedure
  • 48.  2-3-years gray zone  potential for acetabular development diminished therefore many surgeons recommend a concomitant acetabular procedure with open reduction or 6-8 weeks after  JBJS Feb, 2002 Salter Innominate Osteotomy… Bohm,Brzuske incidence of AVN is greater with simultaneous open reduction and acetabular procedure
  • 49.  Lovell and Winter  judge stability at time of reduction and if stable observe for period of time for development  if not developing properly with decreased acetabular index, teardrop then consider secondary procedure  most common osteotomy is Salter or Pemberton  anatomic deficiency is anterior and Salter provides this while Pemberton provides anterior and lateral coverage
  • 50.  Goal of treatment is to have radiographically normal hip at maturity to prevent DJD  after reduction achieved potential for development continues until age 4 after which potential decreases  child < 4 minimal dysplasia may observe but if severe than subluxations and residual dysplasias shoild be corrected  when evaluating persistent dysplasia look at femur and acetabulum  DDH deficiency usually acetabular side
  • 51.  plain xray with measurement of CE angle and acetabular index  young children deficiency anterior and adolescents can be global  deformities of femoral neck significant if lead to subluxation  lateral subluxation with extreme coxa valga or anterior subluxation with excessive anteversion ( defined on CT )  usually DDH patients have a normal neck shaft angle
  • 52.  Dysplasia for 2-3-years after reduction proximal femoral derotation or varus osteotomy should be considered if excessive anteversion or valgus  prior to performing these be sure head can be concentrically reduced on AP view with leg abducted 30 and internally rotated  varus osteotomy done to redirect head to center of acetabulum to stimulate normal development  must be done before age 4 as remodeling potential goes down after this
  • 53.  Femoral osteotomy should only be used in conjunction with pelvic procedure as no potential for acetabular growth or remodeling but changing orientation of femur shifts the weightbearing portion  Pelvic osteotomy considerations  age  congruent reduction  range of motion  degenerative changes
  • 54.  Redirectional Salter ( hinges on symphysis pubis) Sutherland double innominate osteotomy Steel ( Triple osteotomy) Ganz ( rotational)  Acetabuloplasties ( decrease volume ) hinge on triradiate cartilage ( therefore immature patients) Pemberton Dega ( posterior coverage in CP patients )  Salvage depend on fibrous metaplasia of capsule shelf and Chiari
  • 55.  Worst complication is disturbance of growth in proximal femur including the epiphysis and physeal plate  commonly referred to as AVN however, no pathology to confirm this  may be due to vascular insults to epiphysis or physeal plate or pressure injury  occurrs only in patients that have been treated and may be seen in opposite normal hip
  • 56.  Extremes of position in abduction ( greater 60 degrees ) and abduction with internal rotation  compression on medial circumflex artery as passes the iliopsoas tendon and compression of the terminal branch between lateral neck and acetabulum  “ frog leg position “ uniformly results in proximal growth disturbance
  • 57.  extreme position can also cause pressure necrosis onf epiphyseal cartilage and physeal plate  severin method can obtain reduction but very high incidence of necrosis  multiple classification systems with Salter most popular
  • 58.  1 failure of appearance of ossific nucleus within 1 year of reduction2  2 failure of growth of an existing nucleus within 1 year  3 broadening of femoral neck within 1 year  4 increased xray density then fragmentation of head  5 residual deformity of head when re- ossification complete including coxa magna,vara and short neck
  • 59.  Classified growth disturbances assoc with various degrees of physeal arrest  1 all disturbances not assoc with physis  2 lateral physeal arrest ( most common )  3 central physeal arrest  4 medial physeal arrest  longterm follow up shows that necrosis of femoral head decreases longevity of hip
  • 60.  Femoral and/or acetabular osteotomy to maintain reduction and shift areas of pressure  trochanteric overgrowth causing an abductor lurch treated with greater trochanter physeal arrest if done before age 8 otherwise distal transfer  early detection is key with 95% success rate of treatment  identify growth disturbance lines