Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The missing piece: when Docker networking
unleashes software architecture 2.0
A. Blind
DevOps coach
Societe Generale
@adrienblind
L. Grangeau
Solutions architect
Finaxys
@laurentgrangeau
Agenda
2 - Starters
Docker networking
& volume features
discovered
4 - Dessert
Taste-an-app
1 - Apetizer
Back on current
Docker paradigms
3 - Main course
Application
architecture shifts
Back on current
docker paradigms
Back on Docker paradigms
‘’A universal, self-sufficient and standard artifact embedding an app
module, and its subsequent infrastructure configuration’’
Immutable
Versionned
Light
Portable
Disposable
Programatic
Social
Incremental
 It’s mainly focused on enclosing computing
capabilities: what about storage ? Network ?
Networking & volume
features discovered
Docker networking
Docker networking
Docker networking
The Container Network Model (CNM)
A docker container
Endpoint
A docker container
Endpoint
A docker container
EndpointEndpoint
Network sandbox Network sandbox Network sandbox
Front network Back network
Docker networking
$ docker network create mynetwork
5000dec7c180a63d87031de7e6bfcf2b25cf1e5daef6338f16fbd4
451210a938
$ docker network create –d overlay multihostnetwork
e6537b859359843bc02392245ab226070f79dbf87be2d492969c84
3f89fb6de6
Docker networking
$ docker network inspect mynetwork
[
{
"Name": "mynetwork",
"Id":
"5000dec7c180a63d87031de7e6bfcf2b25cf1e5daef6338f16fbd4451
210a938",
"Scope": "local",
"Driver": "bridge",
"IPAM": {
"Driver": "default",
"Config": [
{}
]
},
"Containers": {},
"Options": {}
}
]
Docker networking
Host Host Host Host
SDNs
SDN 1
SDN 2
SDN 3
Docker networking
Docker networking
Docker Compose evolved to embrace
new networking features
$ docker-compose --x-networking
--x-network-driver=overlay up
$ docker-compose up
Docker volumes
Docker volumes
Host file system Host file system
‘’Former data management locked in a host’’
Docker volumes
Host file system
Container
Volume
‘’Containers mount a volume which may be
backed externaly’’
Docker volumes
$ docker volume create –d volplugin --name pool/name
Cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390dd38d94ed4649cd985456d5
23fb05d4cc
$ docker run –d –p 8080:8080 –v
pool/name:/var/jenkins_home jenkins
96aec6f4e45e050dfb4f75a1009e7f105bced5b406752e62d47061
5d07348b07
Docker volumes
$ docker volume ls
DRIVER VOLUME NAME
local cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390…
local f19f50251f48c64a6b33a5c637c2330…
$ docker volume inspect
cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390dd38d94…
[
{
"Name": "cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390dd38d94…",
"Driver": "local",
"Mountpoint":
"/mnt/sda1/var/lib/docker/volumes/[…]/_data"
}
]
Take-away
Application
Compute
(Run containers)
Docker building blocks
Application
Compute
(Run containers)
Storage
(Volumes)
‘’Immutability of containers, resiliency & scalability
led to data externalization in separate objects’’
‘’Fine-granularity of containers led to closely
interconnect them’’
Application
Compute
(Run containers)
Storage
(Volumes)
Transport
(Network)
‘’The whole topology can now
be described’’
Application
Compute
(Run containers)
Storage
(Volumes)
Transport
(Network)
Topology
(Compose)
‘’Docker finally shifted to
object-oriented infra. architecture’’
Application
Compute
(Run containers)
Storage
(Volumes)
Transport
(Network)
Topology
(Compose)
CaaS platform (Swarm, Machine...)
Application
architecture shifts
Security paradigms shifts
Security paradigms shifts
Your IT opens up
• Externalization (housing, hosting)
• Cloud (IaaS/PaaS/SaaS)
Open up your IS
• B2B, services exposition
• Multi tenancy
More & more breaches appears in your Great Wall of China!
Security paradigms shifts
The necessary porosity of your IS requires to stick
security closer to each application: sandbox your apps
and expose protected interfaces!
Network is part of application topology
Security is an app topic, not just infra. concern
Onboard security in feature teamSecDevOps
Network paradigms shifts
VM
VM
VM
VM
VM
VM
VM
VM
VM
Internet
Internet
DMZ
Physical overview
Logical overview
Tenant
#1
Tenant
#2
LAN
LAN
DMZ1
DMZ2
Traditional networks
relies a lot on low layers
(L2, etc.)
Application topologies
are quite different from
physical ones
Network paradigms shifts
SDNs propose network solutions embracing
cloud paradigms
Massively multi-tenant
Thousands tenants, massively scalable
Easy & fast (de)provisioning
Infra as code, API centric
Infrastructure agnostic
L3, does not stick with lower levels (physical designs, vlans & co)
Decouple infrastructure & tenants lifecycles
Cross technology, vendor agnostic
From Enterprise Services buses
to full-mesh topologies
ESB
Service Service Service
Service Service
>
ServiceService
Service
Service
Service
Micro services
Fine-grained, highly decoupled and
atomic purpose centric services
Designed
for failure
Multi-versioned
Scalable
Micro services
Stateless
Share-nothing
Immutable
Continuously
delivered
Distributed
Service
consumer
Service
provider
Registry
2. Find 1. Publish
3. Bind
Leverage on a Service registry to discover
where are services located
Micro services
Resilience & scalability: apps problem now!
Vertical > horizontal
Apps designed for failure & scalability
Data to be externalized
Dumber infrastructure
 Structured: MongoDB, Hadoop, Cassandra, Elastic Search...
 Binaries: object storage with Ceph, OpenStack Swift...
 Helpful patterns: stateless, multi-versioning, loose coupling...
 Infrastructure rationalization
 Low-cost, poor-SLA commodity
« Organizations which design systems... are constrained to
produce designs which are copies of the communication structures
of these organizations ». - M. Conway, 1968
Consider shifting your organization if you
wish to shift your architecture
Forget about the central architects myth of
organizing, integrating everything
Consider changing your organization to expect
changing the architecture!  promote feature teams
Organization
Docker suits perfectly new applications
challenges
Create docker networks to isolate applications
Docker container properties fits micro-services challenges
Resilience & scalability is mostly about multiplying containers
Expect to discuss roles shift in organization
Taste-an-app
Execution platform
Registry
Docker-machine
Docker-swarm
The registrator
discovers new
containers and
feeds the registry
Application design
Provider micro serviceConsumers
The python app module exposes a REST service searching
information in the MongoDB
The NGINX reverse proxy forward app. requests on one of the
python instance registered in Consul
Find
Application topology & runtime
The whole application topology is stored as:
docker-compose yaml file
docker-compose args (aka --x-networking & --x-network-driver)
You can scale up or down the python instances of the micro-
service using traditionnal docker-compose scale command
Network view
Only the load balancer VIP is exposed externally
A WAF instance could secure this entrypoint
SDN « dockerconeu15 »
Host network
Provider micro serviceConsumers
Network view - advanced
Provider micro service
Consumers
SDN « front »
SDN « back »
Host network
Back
Middle
Front
‘’To enhance security
you may decouple
each application tier’’
Zoom on the registry usages
Between micro-services, consumers asks the
registry where a desired micro-service is located
Inside a micro-service, NGINX is made aware of
the backend API instances available, via the registry
At container level, the registrator enable to registers
any container instances, grouped per type
At infrastructure level, the registry is used by swarm
(internally) to be aware of the cluster’s participants
Noticed the different usages of a registry ?
You may consider using different registries for each usage : for example an
internal registry for the micro service internal topology
Conclusions
Docker shifted from universal containers to
object-oriented infrastructure
Security is an app concern
Software is eating the world: application
architecture is the key, infrastructure is commodity
Thank you!
A. Blind
@adrienblind
adrien.blind@sgcib.com
L. Grangeau
@laurentgrangeau
laurent.grangeau@gmail.com

More Related Content

The missing piece : when Docker networking and services finally unleashes software architecture 2.0

  • 1. The missing piece: when Docker networking unleashes software architecture 2.0 A. Blind DevOps coach Societe Generale @adrienblind L. Grangeau Solutions architect Finaxys @laurentgrangeau
  • 2. Agenda 2 - Starters Docker networking & volume features discovered 4 - Dessert Taste-an-app 1 - Apetizer Back on current Docker paradigms 3 - Main course Application architecture shifts
  • 4. Back on Docker paradigms ‘’A universal, self-sufficient and standard artifact embedding an app module, and its subsequent infrastructure configuration’’ Immutable Versionned Light Portable Disposable Programatic Social Incremental  It’s mainly focused on enclosing computing capabilities: what about storage ? Network ?
  • 8. Docker networking The Container Network Model (CNM) A docker container Endpoint A docker container Endpoint A docker container EndpointEndpoint Network sandbox Network sandbox Network sandbox Front network Back network
  • 9. Docker networking $ docker network create mynetwork 5000dec7c180a63d87031de7e6bfcf2b25cf1e5daef6338f16fbd4 451210a938 $ docker network create –d overlay multihostnetwork e6537b859359843bc02392245ab226070f79dbf87be2d492969c84 3f89fb6de6
  • 10. Docker networking $ docker network inspect mynetwork [ { "Name": "mynetwork", "Id": "5000dec7c180a63d87031de7e6bfcf2b25cf1e5daef6338f16fbd4451 210a938", "Scope": "local", "Driver": "bridge", "IPAM": { "Driver": "default", "Config": [ {} ] }, "Containers": {}, "Options": {} } ]
  • 11. Docker networking Host Host Host Host SDNs SDN 1 SDN 2 SDN 3
  • 13. Docker networking Docker Compose evolved to embrace new networking features $ docker-compose --x-networking --x-network-driver=overlay up $ docker-compose up
  • 15. Docker volumes Host file system Host file system ‘’Former data management locked in a host’’
  • 16. Docker volumes Host file system Container Volume ‘’Containers mount a volume which may be backed externaly’’
  • 17. Docker volumes $ docker volume create –d volplugin --name pool/name Cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390dd38d94ed4649cd985456d5 23fb05d4cc $ docker run –d –p 8080:8080 –v pool/name:/var/jenkins_home jenkins 96aec6f4e45e050dfb4f75a1009e7f105bced5b406752e62d47061 5d07348b07
  • 18. Docker volumes $ docker volume ls DRIVER VOLUME NAME local cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390… local f19f50251f48c64a6b33a5c637c2330… $ docker volume inspect cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390dd38d94… [ { "Name": "cf872ca21d27843f6b6319ac1a34390dd38d94…", "Driver": "local", "Mountpoint": "/mnt/sda1/var/lib/docker/volumes/[…]/_data" } ]
  • 21. Application Compute (Run containers) Storage (Volumes) ‘’Immutability of containers, resiliency & scalability led to data externalization in separate objects’’
  • 22. ‘’Fine-granularity of containers led to closely interconnect them’’ Application Compute (Run containers) Storage (Volumes) Transport (Network)
  • 23. ‘’The whole topology can now be described’’ Application Compute (Run containers) Storage (Volumes) Transport (Network) Topology (Compose)
  • 24. ‘’Docker finally shifted to object-oriented infra. architecture’’ Application Compute (Run containers) Storage (Volumes) Transport (Network) Topology (Compose) CaaS platform (Swarm, Machine...)
  • 27. Security paradigms shifts Your IT opens up • Externalization (housing, hosting) • Cloud (IaaS/PaaS/SaaS) Open up your IS • B2B, services exposition • Multi tenancy More & more breaches appears in your Great Wall of China!
  • 28. Security paradigms shifts The necessary porosity of your IS requires to stick security closer to each application: sandbox your apps and expose protected interfaces! Network is part of application topology Security is an app topic, not just infra. concern Onboard security in feature teamSecDevOps
  • 29. Network paradigms shifts VM VM VM VM VM VM VM VM VM Internet Internet DMZ Physical overview Logical overview Tenant #1 Tenant #2 LAN LAN DMZ1 DMZ2 Traditional networks relies a lot on low layers (L2, etc.) Application topologies are quite different from physical ones
  • 30. Network paradigms shifts SDNs propose network solutions embracing cloud paradigms Massively multi-tenant Thousands tenants, massively scalable Easy & fast (de)provisioning Infra as code, API centric Infrastructure agnostic L3, does not stick with lower levels (physical designs, vlans & co) Decouple infrastructure & tenants lifecycles Cross technology, vendor agnostic
  • 31. From Enterprise Services buses to full-mesh topologies ESB Service Service Service Service Service > ServiceService Service Service Service Micro services
  • 32. Fine-grained, highly decoupled and atomic purpose centric services Designed for failure Multi-versioned Scalable Micro services Stateless Share-nothing Immutable Continuously delivered Distributed
  • 33. Service consumer Service provider Registry 2. Find 1. Publish 3. Bind Leverage on a Service registry to discover where are services located Micro services
  • 34. Resilience & scalability: apps problem now! Vertical > horizontal Apps designed for failure & scalability Data to be externalized Dumber infrastructure  Structured: MongoDB, Hadoop, Cassandra, Elastic Search...  Binaries: object storage with Ceph, OpenStack Swift...  Helpful patterns: stateless, multi-versioning, loose coupling...  Infrastructure rationalization  Low-cost, poor-SLA commodity
  • 35. « Organizations which design systems... are constrained to produce designs which are copies of the communication structures of these organizations ». - M. Conway, 1968 Consider shifting your organization if you wish to shift your architecture Forget about the central architects myth of organizing, integrating everything Consider changing your organization to expect changing the architecture!  promote feature teams Organization
  • 36. Docker suits perfectly new applications challenges Create docker networks to isolate applications Docker container properties fits micro-services challenges Resilience & scalability is mostly about multiplying containers Expect to discuss roles shift in organization
  • 39. Application design Provider micro serviceConsumers The python app module exposes a REST service searching information in the MongoDB The NGINX reverse proxy forward app. requests on one of the python instance registered in Consul Find
  • 40. Application topology & runtime The whole application topology is stored as: docker-compose yaml file docker-compose args (aka --x-networking & --x-network-driver) You can scale up or down the python instances of the micro- service using traditionnal docker-compose scale command
  • 41. Network view Only the load balancer VIP is exposed externally A WAF instance could secure this entrypoint SDN « dockerconeu15 » Host network Provider micro serviceConsumers
  • 42. Network view - advanced Provider micro service Consumers SDN « front » SDN « back » Host network Back Middle Front ‘’To enhance security you may decouple each application tier’’
  • 43. Zoom on the registry usages Between micro-services, consumers asks the registry where a desired micro-service is located Inside a micro-service, NGINX is made aware of the backend API instances available, via the registry At container level, the registrator enable to registers any container instances, grouped per type At infrastructure level, the registry is used by swarm (internally) to be aware of the cluster’s participants Noticed the different usages of a registry ? You may consider using different registries for each usage : for example an internal registry for the micro service internal topology
  • 45. Docker shifted from universal containers to object-oriented infrastructure Security is an app concern Software is eating the world: application architecture is the key, infrastructure is commodity
  • 46. Thank you! A. Blind @adrienblind adrien.blind@sgcib.com L. Grangeau @laurentgrangeau laurent.grangeau@gmail.com