Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
DYE-SENSITIZEDSOLARCELLS
JEFF JOSEPH
S3, EEE
2
Preview
 Introduction
 Paths to modern era
 Construction
 Working
 Advantage and disadvantages
 Comparison
 Conclusions
3
Introduction
□A solar cell is a device which converts light energy to electrical energy.
□It is not ecofriendly and economic.
4
Introduction (Contd…)
□Dss cells are made with organic dyes
□Converts light energy to electric energy
□Eco-friendly and economic
5
 Invented in 1988 by Michael Grätzel and Brian O'Regan
 Michael Grätzel has been awarded the 2010 Millennium
Technology prize for this invention
 in the beginning the efficiency was up to 9%
 At present efficiency improved to 11%
 Mncs aiming to launch commercial products in future
 The research is going on…….
Paths to modern era
construction
6
□Electrolyte in between anode and cathode
□Tio2 and dies
□External circuit
7
Working Schematic representation
8
working
 Dye absorbs light and covert it into electrons
 Electrons moves to the anode through tio2
 Electron passes through external circuit to cathode
 This electron reduces triiodide to iodide-ion in the
electrolyte
 Iodide-ion transfers electrons to the dye
 The process continuous….
9
Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages
□ Ability to Work at Wider
Angles and in Low Light
□ Long Life
□ Good Price/Performance Ratio
□ Low Cost
□ Mechanical Robustness
□ Ability to Operate at Lower
Internal Temperatures
□ Lowering the electricity bills
Disadvantages
□ DSSC design is the use of the
liquid electrolyte
□ which has temperature
stability problems
□ costly ruthenium (dye),
platinum(catalyst)
□ the electrolyte solution
contains volatile organic
compounds (or VOC's),
10
comparison
DSS Cells
□ Less cost
□ Flexible
□ A very low sunlight is
needed for the conversion
□ Less efficient
□ Efficiency upto 10%
□ Fabrication is simple
PHOTOVOLATILE
CELLS
□ More cost
□ Not flexible
□ Need a minimum sunlight
for the conversion
□ More efficient
□ Efficiency upto 25%
□ Fabrication is complex
11
Conclusion
□ Good for environment
□ Development of this technology is essential
□ Large investments leads to a solution for country’s
energy crisis
□ Need of Governments direct involvement to generalise
this idea
□ Large change in economy.
12
Refrences
□ Google
□ Wikipedia
□ Science direct
13
THANK YOU
14

More Related Content

Dye sensitised solar cells

  • 2. 2 Preview  Introduction  Paths to modern era  Construction  Working  Advantage and disadvantages  Comparison  Conclusions
  • 3. 3 Introduction □A solar cell is a device which converts light energy to electrical energy. □It is not ecofriendly and economic.
  • 4. 4 Introduction (Contd…) □Dss cells are made with organic dyes □Converts light energy to electric energy □Eco-friendly and economic
  • 5. 5  Invented in 1988 by Michael Grätzel and Brian O'Regan  Michael Grätzel has been awarded the 2010 Millennium Technology prize for this invention  in the beginning the efficiency was up to 9%  At present efficiency improved to 11%  Mncs aiming to launch commercial products in future  The research is going on……. Paths to modern era
  • 6. construction 6 □Electrolyte in between anode and cathode □Tio2 and dies □External circuit
  • 8. 8 working  Dye absorbs light and covert it into electrons  Electrons moves to the anode through tio2  Electron passes through external circuit to cathode  This electron reduces triiodide to iodide-ion in the electrolyte  Iodide-ion transfers electrons to the dye  The process continuous….
  • 9. 9
  • 10. Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages □ Ability to Work at Wider Angles and in Low Light □ Long Life □ Good Price/Performance Ratio □ Low Cost □ Mechanical Robustness □ Ability to Operate at Lower Internal Temperatures □ Lowering the electricity bills Disadvantages □ DSSC design is the use of the liquid electrolyte □ which has temperature stability problems □ costly ruthenium (dye), platinum(catalyst) □ the electrolyte solution contains volatile organic compounds (or VOC's), 10
  • 11. comparison DSS Cells □ Less cost □ Flexible □ A very low sunlight is needed for the conversion □ Less efficient □ Efficiency upto 10% □ Fabrication is simple PHOTOVOLATILE CELLS □ More cost □ Not flexible □ Need a minimum sunlight for the conversion □ More efficient □ Efficiency upto 25% □ Fabrication is complex 11
  • 12. Conclusion □ Good for environment □ Development of this technology is essential □ Large investments leads to a solution for country’s energy crisis □ Need of Governments direct involvement to generalise this idea □ Large change in economy. 12