This document discusses three generations of technology-enhanced pedagogy in Edmonton schools: (1) behaviourist/cognitive models focusing on individual learning of content, (2) constructivist models emphasizing group learning and social construction of knowledge, and (3) connectivist models centered around networked learning and lifelong learning in complex contexts. It argues that effective 21st century education requires elements of all three pedagogical approaches and discusses barriers to technological adoption as well as recommendations for overcoming those barriers.
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 68
More Related Content
Edmonton teacher's conv final
1. Three generations of Technology Enhanced Pedagogy in Edmonton SchoolsTerry Anderson, Professor and Canada Research Chair inDistance Education
3. “Those who educate children well are more to be honored than parents, for these only gave life, those the art of living well.” Aristotle (384-322 BC) http://httphttp:/
4. Givens:Our students and ourselves must become lifelong learnersGlobal access to digital information and human connection is the greatest tool for learning since the invention of writingExploiting and contributing to Net communities and resources requires new literaciesNo one knows more about teaching and learning than practicing teachersTeachers, like other professionals are busy and have first lives as well as Second LifeWe can learn to teach and to learn more effectively
5. Dealing with Distance Education Technological DeterminismThe Man with the Magic Lantern, a tribute to educator Ned Corbett
6. Students today can’t prepare bark to calculate their problems. They depend on their slates which are more expensive. What will they do when their slate is dropped and it breaks? They will be unable to write!”Teachers Conference, 1703From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
7. Students today depend upon paper too much. They don’t know how to write on slate without chalk dust all over themselves. They can’t clean a slate properly. What will they do when they run out of paper?”Principal’s Association, 1815From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
8. Students today depend too much upon ink. They don’t know how to use a pen knife to sharpen a pencil. Pen and ink will never replace the pencil.”National Association of Teachers, 1907From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
9. Students today depend upon store-bought ink. They don’t know how to make their own. When they run out of ink they will be unable to write. This is a sad commentary on modern education.”The Rural American Teacher, 1929From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
10. “Students today depend upon these expensive fountain pens. They can no longer write with a straight pen and nib (not to mention sharpening their own quills).We parents must not allow them to wallow in such luxury to the detriment of learning how to cope in the real business world, which is not so extravagant.”PTA Gazette, 1941From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
11. “Ball point pens will be the ruin of education in our country. Students use these devices and then throw them away. The American virtues of thrift and frugality are being discarded. Business and banks will never allow such expensive luxuries.”Federal Teacher, 1950From Father Stanley Bezuska Boston College
12. Online education “is not a progressive trend towards a new era at all, but a regressive trend, towards the rather old era of mass production, standardization and purely commercial interests.” David Noble, 1998
13. Remember – The Social Construction of TechnologyDistance Education is, by definition, technologically mediated and thus is influenced by technological determinism.BUT….Interpretative Flexibility
22. Three Generations of Flexible Learning PedagogiesBehaviourist/Cognitive – Self Paced, Individual Study Constructivist – GroupsConnectivist – Networks and Collectives
36. Behaviourist/Cognitive Knowledge Is:Logically coherent, existing independent of perspectiveLargely context freeCapable of being transmittedAssumes closed systems with discoverable relationships between inputs and outputs
46. Need for knowledge to be subject to social discussion, validation and application in real world contexts
47. (from Honebein, 1996; Jonassen, 1991; Kanuka & Anderson, 1999)Constructivist Knowledge is:Socially constructedArrived at through dialogic encounter(Bakhtin, 1975)“education as the discursive construction of shared knowledge”(Wegerif, R., 2009)Kathy Sierra http://www.speedofcreativity.org/
48. Assessing students using Constructivist Learning“What is important is the process of knowledge acquisition, not any product or observable behavior.”Jonassen, 1991
50. Impact (Mean effect size) of Cooperative versus Individualistic Learning contextsFrom Johnson and Johnson (1989). Cooperation and competition. Theory and research
51. Advances in Constructivist Learning ToolsEasier tools for group formation and collaborative production.LMS advances, Group editing – wiki, Google docsFree synchronous tools- SkypeBeyond email – texting, Twitter, location awareness, immersive environments
52. Problems with GroupsRestrictions in time, space, pace, & relationship - NOT OPENOften overly confined by leader expectation and institutional curriculum controlUsually Isolated from the authentic world of practice“low tolerance of internal difference, sexist and ethicized regulation, high demand for obedience to its norms and exclusionary practices.” Cousin & Deepwell 2005“Pathological politeness” and fear of debateGroup think (Baron, 2005)Poor preparation for Lifelong Learning beyond the courseRelationshipsPaulsen (1993)Law of Cooperative Freedom
54. 3rd Generation - Networked Learning usingConnectivist PedagogyLearning is building networks of information, contacts and resources that are applied to real problems.
55. Connectivist Learning PrinciplesGeorge Siemens, 2004Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions.Learning is a process of connecting information sources and people.Learning may reside in non-human appliances.Capacity to know is more critical than what is currently known.Nurturing and maintaining connections is needed to facilitate continual learning.Currency (accurate, up-to-date knowledge) is the intent of all connectivist learning activities.
57. Connectivist Learning designsConnection formingSelectionFilteringAwareness and ReceptivityContribution and InvolvementReflection and MetacognitionPettenati, M. (2007).
59. Connectivist focuses on Networks - - not GroupsGroupNetworkShared interest/practiceFluid membershipFriends of friendsReputation and altruism drivenEmergent norms, structuresActivity ebbs and flowsRarely F2FMetaphor: Virtual Community of Practice37Dron and Anderson, 2007
60. Networks add diversity to learning“People who live in the intersection of social worlds are at higher risk of having good ideas” Burt, 2005, p. 90
64. Pedagiogy ConclusionBehavioural/Cognitive models are useful for memory and conceptual knowledge acquisition.Constructivist models develop group skills and trust.Connectivist models and tools introduce networked learning and are foundational for lifelong learning in complex contexts21 Century Literacy's and skills demand effective use of all three pedagogies
65. Desperate need to develop means and tools to both teach and assess 21st Century learning needs.If you’re not feeling a bit overwhelmed, you aren’t paying attention.Very active R&D area (LMS companies, Web 2.0, learning analytics – ie LAC11)
67. Data from 2009 survey of 1,000 American K12 teachers – Walden UniversityEducators, Technology and 21st Century Skills
70. Data from 2009 survey of 1,000 American K12 teachers – Walden UniversityEducators, Technology and 21st Century Skills
72. Making Effective ChangeEverett Rogers (2001)Perceived Relative advantageObservability – build a net presenceCompatibilityTrialability – teachers like students need safe opportunites to practice, have fun and enjoy recessesComplexity – familiarity with one web 2.0 tool leads to ease of use with others
73. Standard ‘solutions’ to tech underuseMore support from AVP, Principal, superintendentMore time to learnFewer students to teachMore money for better technologyMore Dept of Educ. curriculum resourcesBetter students
74. Acceptable Use PoliciesThere is bad stuff on the NetThe Net is the most powerful Learning tool ever invented.There is help!! We need Acceptable Use Policies, but they must make sense for a networked era:See A wikiSocial Media Guidelines atsocialmediaguidelines.pbworks.com
75. How do we deal with Net Threats?“If parents and teachers do not provide guidance and support, students will depend upon their immature and naïve peers” Choulat 2010 “Are you comfortable and competent to talk to your students about Net Safety??
76. Are Internet Blocking Sites effective?Access to the net through mobile devices (tablets through cell phones), is becoming the primary means of access – these are beyond school control.Sometimes access restrictions (Netnanny etc.) inhibit capacity to teach about Internet safety and can deprive access to effective learning (like Youtube, TeacherTube etc.)Tools should be under individual or school control
77. Should your ‘Friend’ your Students on “Any teacher who links to a student on MySpace or Facebook is an ABSOLUTE FOOL!!!!!” see discussion at Doug Johnson’s blog”“This is how students communicate today and if we're not Tweeting, texting, emailing, commenting, then we're not communicating with our students” Principal Chris Lehman“The School Principal just Friended me” blog by 11 year old Ador Svitak
78. CyberbullyingAbout half of young people have experienced some form of cyber bullying, and 10 to 20 percent experience it regularly
88. Recommendations for teachersThe Net can enhance all effective pedagogiesBe as fearless as your students.Seek out or create opportunities to learning from and collaborate with.You can’t do everything, but doing the same over and over gets you further and further behind.
89. Greenhow,2008 University of Minnisota College of Education survey study. "Students are developing a positive attitude towards using technology systems, editing and customizing content and thinking about online design and layout. They're also sharing creative original work like poetry and film and practicing safe and responsible use of information and technology. The Web sites offer tremendous educational potential.”
90. Social Networking benefits outside of the classroomQualitative study of low income US students“Our findings reveal that SNSs served important roles for these students, They facilitated emotional support, relational maintenance and provided a platform for self-presentation where students could “be more relaxed,”“mess around,” and perform on their own terms with the social, cultural, and technical tools at their disposal. Students used their online social network to fulfill essential social learning functions, meeting a range of interpersonal needs, including validation and appreciation of creative endeavors, peer support from current and former classmates, and targeted help with school-related tasks. Greenhow, & Robelia (2009) Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(4)
95. Slides available at http://www.slideshare.net/terrya/hub-de-summit-sydneyYour comments and questions most welcomed!Terry Anderson terrya@athabascau.caBlog: terrya.edublogs.org