Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
A Study on Ethnocentric
  Tendencies of Indian
       Students


           Presentors
         Harsh Ajmera
      Korada Rahul Gupta
       Prof. Sandeep Puri
Presentation Flow
•   Introduction
•   Literature Review
•   Objective
•   Methodology
•   Finding
•   Conclusions and recommendations
Introduction
• Stiff cut throat competition leads to forcing any manager to understand
  his consumers.

• Understanding would lead to better strategies

• consumers love for the products made in own country has attracted
  interest amongst practitioners to develop and evaluate their marketing
  strategies and policies.

• The decision to purchase products made locally or internationally can be
  stimulated by this expression. (CE).

• Big shift in Indian Economy since 1991
• Big changes in Consumer Behavior, Entry of foreign players, competitive
  pricing,

• CE refers to views of consumers about appropriateness and morality
  purchasing products made in foreign land.

• For people of ethnocentric opinion it is wrong to purchase imported
  products because it hurts economy, causes to loss of jobs.

• For highly ethnocentric consumers, products from foreign land are a
  matter of great contempt.

• While for the non ethnocentric consumers the products irrespective of
  their origin have to be evaluated on the basis of its merits alone.
Literature Review (1)
• Term Introduced by W G Summers in 1906It is psychological construct
  that aids in shaping attitudes and moral grounds of purchasing products
  made not in one’s own country.

• Shankermahesh, 2006  sociological construct, as a view of things in
  which the center of one’s decision making is one’s own group and others
  are scaled and rated with respect to it.

• Luque Martizez et al 2000 
   – A difference arises between the in group and out group or the we-
     group and other group or the us and everybody else as a group
   – It’s a tendency of a person to identify strongly with his group culture
     or to view any political, social or economic activities from point of in-
     group
Literature Review (2)
• Shimp and Sharma 1987,  consumer ethnocentrism is a universal
  phenomenon rooted to racial and cross cultural relations such views
  would be natural and even unconscious. Though

• Shankarmahesh 2006  argued on the contrary that they are part of
  human nature. People have tendencies to
   – Define their own culture correct and natural and while discard others.
   – Perceive their customs are natural and universally good.
   – Favor one’s own group.
   – Feel proud of in-group and hostile of out-group
Literature Review (3)
• Ethnocentrism has two major components- cultural and economic.

    – Cultural ethnocentrism would relate to views of a person that would
      give preference to one’s own cultural norms and attitudes and devalue
      others. This comes as visible by view of their clothing, religious
      symbols, etc

    – Economic Ethnocentrism views other groups as economic competitors
      and therefore should be limited in their capacity. It is visible by the
      preference one gives to goods and services of one’s own group.
Literature Review (4)
• The CETSCALE:
Shimp and Sharma 1987, developed the consumer ethnocentrism to a
   measurable construct.
CETSCALE is a 17 items instrument formulates to better understand and
   explain and predict consumer’s behavior for foreign products or services.
   The Likert type sentences in this instrument measure the tendency of
   consumers to act consistently towards and their origin.
• Bawa (2004), CETSCALE can be linked to the following four concepts:
    – It results in the loss of jobs
    – It is unpatriotic
    – It hurts the domestic economy
    – It is tied to product availability
    – The instrument is well tested for validity and reliability as a measure of
       Consumer Ethnocentrism with sample from USA, Spain and other
       nations.

More Related Content

Ethnocentric tendencies presentation fobe

  • 1. A Study on Ethnocentric Tendencies of Indian Students Presentors Harsh Ajmera Korada Rahul Gupta Prof. Sandeep Puri
  • 2. Presentation Flow • Introduction • Literature Review • Objective • Methodology • Finding • Conclusions and recommendations
  • 3. Introduction • Stiff cut throat competition leads to forcing any manager to understand his consumers. • Understanding would lead to better strategies • consumers love for the products made in own country has attracted interest amongst practitioners to develop and evaluate their marketing strategies and policies. • The decision to purchase products made locally or internationally can be stimulated by this expression. (CE). • Big shift in Indian Economy since 1991
  • 4. • Big changes in Consumer Behavior, Entry of foreign players, competitive pricing, • CE refers to views of consumers about appropriateness and morality purchasing products made in foreign land. • For people of ethnocentric opinion it is wrong to purchase imported products because it hurts economy, causes to loss of jobs. • For highly ethnocentric consumers, products from foreign land are a matter of great contempt. • While for the non ethnocentric consumers the products irrespective of their origin have to be evaluated on the basis of its merits alone.
  • 5. Literature Review (1) • Term Introduced by W G Summers in 1906It is psychological construct that aids in shaping attitudes and moral grounds of purchasing products made not in one’s own country. • Shankermahesh, 2006  sociological construct, as a view of things in which the center of one’s decision making is one’s own group and others are scaled and rated with respect to it. • Luque Martizez et al 2000  – A difference arises between the in group and out group or the we- group and other group or the us and everybody else as a group – It’s a tendency of a person to identify strongly with his group culture or to view any political, social or economic activities from point of in- group
  • 6. Literature Review (2) • Shimp and Sharma 1987,  consumer ethnocentrism is a universal phenomenon rooted to racial and cross cultural relations such views would be natural and even unconscious. Though • Shankarmahesh 2006  argued on the contrary that they are part of human nature. People have tendencies to – Define their own culture correct and natural and while discard others. – Perceive their customs are natural and universally good. – Favor one’s own group. – Feel proud of in-group and hostile of out-group
  • 7. Literature Review (3) • Ethnocentrism has two major components- cultural and economic. – Cultural ethnocentrism would relate to views of a person that would give preference to one’s own cultural norms and attitudes and devalue others. This comes as visible by view of their clothing, religious symbols, etc – Economic Ethnocentrism views other groups as economic competitors and therefore should be limited in their capacity. It is visible by the preference one gives to goods and services of one’s own group.
  • 8. Literature Review (4) • The CETSCALE: Shimp and Sharma 1987, developed the consumer ethnocentrism to a measurable construct. CETSCALE is a 17 items instrument formulates to better understand and explain and predict consumer’s behavior for foreign products or services. The Likert type sentences in this instrument measure the tendency of consumers to act consistently towards and their origin. • Bawa (2004), CETSCALE can be linked to the following four concepts: – It results in the loss of jobs – It is unpatriotic – It hurts the domestic economy – It is tied to product availability – The instrument is well tested for validity and reliability as a measure of Consumer Ethnocentrism with sample from USA, Spain and other nations.