Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Forest Data Partnership: Aligning and Innovating for a Shared Data Ecosystem
Data is vital to tackling deforestation & accelerating restoration
Technology offers
unprecedented opportunities to
transform the way landscapes
are monitored and managed
We need to harness the full
potential of data and harmonize
the current fragmented data
landscape
The Forest Data Partnership
Unites organizations, governments and private sector
partners around trusted, transparent geospatial data
solutions that enable credible monitoring, verification and
disclosure of progress in reducing deforestation and
restoring degraded lands.
Five action-oriented work streams
Align process
● Focal areas
○ Cocoa in West Africa
○ Palm Oil in Southeast Asia
○ Cattle and Soy in the Amazon Basin
○ Restoration
● Who are we prioritizing? Mapping stakeholders based on:
○ Roles in how they interact with and/or produce data,
○ Their impact in affecting deforestation and restoration,
○ Their influence in the uptake and application of data
● Actors across supply chains and financial sectors, governments in
producer and consumer countries, civil society, technology and
service providers
○ Reaching beyond the usual suspects
○ Local and place-based affected stakeholders to ensure representation
Align Who?
Align On
What?
Current data challenges and obstacles to uptake and application
of data, such as:
● Gaps (the data doesn’t exist, or isn’t accessible)
● Conflicts (scales, methods)
● Accuracy
● Definitions
● Applications
Align - How
and Why?
●Tiered approach
○ Information gathering from specific stakeholders already
active in ongoing discussions
○ Targeted engagement strategies and business case for
participation for tougher to reach stakeholders
● Tailored to the context and priorities of specific
regions and supply chains
● Learning from existing MSAs to develop alignment
and decision-making processes
○ Interaction between different stakeholders
○ Ensuring representation and buy-in for outputs
(consultation vs. consensus)
Align on
Foundational Data
Gaps
Develop Inclusive
demand-driven
Innovations
Deploy Data
Delivery
Mechanisms
Restoration
Deforestation
Continuous improvement and
replication
Continuous improvement and
replication
Impact
Assessment
Research
Informs policy and
project development
How will this work?
Informs policy and
project development
Innovate
process
Commodity mapping at scale: spatial prediction
Anonymized Data
Raw Data Reference Data
Existing maps
Predicted Maps
(Value + Uncertainty)
Existing maps
Existing maps
Existing maps
Map 1
Map 2
Map N
ENSEMBLE
REF DATA
LCML
Private Aligned Partners Public
Commodity mapping at scale: harmonization
Which oil palm map should you believe? (Hint: trick question.)
Meta-learner*
* Wolpert, 1992, Stacked generalization.
Inclusive mapping at scale
From the Ground to the Cloud and
back
If the harmonized map is wrong,
users who are affected have an
opportunity to correct the record
by submitting more data to train
the meta-learner.
Cloud-based
analytics and
ML
Section #5
Local
communities,
sustainability
users, citizen
scientists
Local insights
and
knowledge, in-
situ
observations
More accurate,
timely
information
Ground measurements
A dynamic pathway for restoration monitoring & planning
Reporting
Monitoring
Planning
THANK YOU
https://forestdatapartnership.org

More Related Content

Forest Data Partnership: Aligning and Innovating for a Shared Data Ecosystem

  • 2. Data is vital to tackling deforestation & accelerating restoration Technology offers unprecedented opportunities to transform the way landscapes are monitored and managed
  • 3. We need to harness the full potential of data and harmonize the current fragmented data landscape
  • 4. The Forest Data Partnership Unites organizations, governments and private sector partners around trusted, transparent geospatial data solutions that enable credible monitoring, verification and disclosure of progress in reducing deforestation and restoring degraded lands.
  • 7. ● Focal areas ○ Cocoa in West Africa ○ Palm Oil in Southeast Asia ○ Cattle and Soy in the Amazon Basin ○ Restoration ● Who are we prioritizing? Mapping stakeholders based on: ○ Roles in how they interact with and/or produce data, ○ Their impact in affecting deforestation and restoration, ○ Their influence in the uptake and application of data ● Actors across supply chains and financial sectors, governments in producer and consumer countries, civil society, technology and service providers ○ Reaching beyond the usual suspects ○ Local and place-based affected stakeholders to ensure representation Align Who?
  • 8. Align On What? Current data challenges and obstacles to uptake and application of data, such as: ● Gaps (the data doesn’t exist, or isn’t accessible) ● Conflicts (scales, methods) ● Accuracy ● Definitions ● Applications
  • 9. Align - How and Why? ●Tiered approach ○ Information gathering from specific stakeholders already active in ongoing discussions ○ Targeted engagement strategies and business case for participation for tougher to reach stakeholders ● Tailored to the context and priorities of specific regions and supply chains ● Learning from existing MSAs to develop alignment and decision-making processes ○ Interaction between different stakeholders ○ Ensuring representation and buy-in for outputs (consultation vs. consensus)
  • 10. Align on Foundational Data Gaps Develop Inclusive demand-driven Innovations Deploy Data Delivery Mechanisms Restoration Deforestation Continuous improvement and replication Continuous improvement and replication Impact Assessment Research Informs policy and project development How will this work? Informs policy and project development
  • 12. Commodity mapping at scale: spatial prediction
  • 13. Anonymized Data Raw Data Reference Data Existing maps Predicted Maps (Value + Uncertainty) Existing maps Existing maps Existing maps Map 1 Map 2 Map N ENSEMBLE REF DATA LCML Private Aligned Partners Public Commodity mapping at scale: harmonization
  • 14. Which oil palm map should you believe? (Hint: trick question.) Meta-learner* * Wolpert, 1992, Stacked generalization.
  • 15. Inclusive mapping at scale From the Ground to the Cloud and back If the harmonized map is wrong, users who are affected have an opportunity to correct the record by submitting more data to train the meta-learner. Cloud-based analytics and ML Section #5 Local communities, sustainability users, citizen scientists Local insights and knowledge, in- situ observations More accurate, timely information Ground measurements
  • 16. A dynamic pathway for restoration monitoring & planning Reporting Monitoring Planning