FP7 evaluation & selection: the point of view of an evaluator
•
0 likes•130 views
The document discusses the process of evaluating proposals for EU funding as an EU evaluator. It begins by introducing the author's expertise and background evaluating FP6 and FP7 proposals. It then outlines the evaluation process, which involves individual evaluation of assigned proposals followed by consensus building and panel evaluation. Key aspects covered include managing conflicts of interest, maintaining confidentiality, and adhering to a code of conduct. The evaluation criteria for integrated projects focus on relevance to program objectives, potential impact, scientific and technological excellence, quality of consortium, and quality of management.
1 of 25
Download to read offline
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
More Related Content
FP7 evaluation & selection: the point of view of an evaluator
16. 3. Scien*fic and technology excellence (thr 4 out
of 5):
– The project has clearly defined objec*ves.
– The objec*ves represent clear progress beyond the
current S&T state‐of‐the‐art
– The proposed approach is likely to enable the project
to achieve the objec*ves
4. Quality of the consor*um (thr 3 out of 5)
– The par*cipants cons*tute a consor*um of high
quality.
– The par*cipants are well‐suited and commided to
the tasks.
– There is a good complementarity.
– The involvement of SME has been adequately
addressed.