The document discusses how teachers can support students in "productive struggle" in mathematics. It notes that students need opportunities to grapple with mathematical concepts rather than being immediately shown solutions. The Common Core Standards also emphasize students constructing and critiquing arguments. The document then provides examples of questions teachers can ask to engage students in explaining their own thinking and engaging with peers' ideas. It discusses research showing a correlation between higher levels of student explanation and engagement with peers' ideas and improved achievement. Finally, it outlines specific teacher practices that can facilitate students elaborating on their thinking and comparing strategies.
2. The Issues
• Students
need
the
opportunity
to
work
and
wrestle
with
mathema;cs
(Hiebert
&
Grouws,
2007)
• expending
effort
to
make
sense
of
mathema;cs
and
figure
out
something
that
is
not
immediately
apparent
• Common
Core
Standards
for
Mathema;cal
Prac;ce
call
for
students
to
“construct
viable
arguments
and
cri;que
the
reasoning
of
others”
including
jus;fying
their
conclusions,
communica;ng
them
to
others,
listening
to
the
arguments
of
others,
responding
to
the
arguments
of
others,
deciding
whether
they
make
sense,
and
asking
useful
ques;ons
to
clarify
or
improve
the
arguments
• How
can
teachers
produc;vely
engage
students
in
wrestling
with
mathema;cs?
3. Maggie
had
3
packages
of
cupcakes.
There
were4
cupcakes
in
each
package.
She
ate
5
cupcakes.
How
many
cupcakes
are
leW?
4. Adam
has
21
cents.
Gumdrops
cost
3
cents.
How
many
gumdrops
can
Adam
buy?
5. Student
explanations
in
mathematics
classrooms
• Related
to
student
achievement
• Our
research
• Others:
Gillies,
Webb
&
Mastergeorge,
Safard
&
Kieran,
Nathan
&
Knuth
• Not
just
any
explaining
–
details
ma_er
• Teachers
can
support
students
to
explain
• O’Connor
&
Michaels,
Gillies,
Mercer
• Ini;al
ques;on:
how
did
you
get
that?
not
sufficient
• 98%
of
the
;me
teachers
asked
• Probing
ques;ons
(sequences),
leading
ques;ons,
bundled
ques;ons
6. Multiple
Dimensions
of
Student
Communication
• Explaining
their
own
thinking
• Engaging
with
others’
thinking
• You
engage
with
others’
ideas
• Others
engage
with
your
ideas
6
7. Engaging with each others’ ideas
Referencing/acknowledging
somebody’s
ideas
in
general
without
details
• I
used
Nomi’s
strategy
• “Does
everyone
agree
with
Sam?”
S
says
no.
• Students
point
to
strategy
like
their
own
Addressing
the
student’s
idea
with
detail
• repea;ng
what
was
already
said
or
wri_en
on
the
board
• sharing
someone
else’s
strategy
for
them
• disagreeing
while
referencing
detail
of
what
they
disagree
with
Addressing
the
detail
of
someone’s
idea
and
contributes
to
someone
else’s
ideas
• S
disagreeing
with
what
was
shared
and
shares
an
alterna;ve
• responds
to
a
S’s
shared
idea
and
adds
to
it
•
construct
strategy
together
8. • Explain
your
thinking
• Engage
with
others’
ideas
to
a
high
degree
• Have
others
engage
with
your
idea
to
a
high
degree
8
9. Relationship
between
Student
Participation
and
Achievement
Par%al
correla%on
with
achievement
Provided
fully-‐detailed
explana;ons
of
how
to
solve
the
problem
.30*
Highest
level
at
which
you
engaged
with
other
students’
ideas
.44*
Highest
level
at
which
other
students
engaged
with
your
ideas
.41*
9
10. If
Seily
has
Iive-‐thirds
liters
of
soda,
what
would
that
look
like?
Draw
and
label
all
parts
11. Some Observations about the Teacher Practices
• Teachers
made
a
variety
of
ini;al
moves
to
help
students
a_end
to
each
other’s
ideas
•
These
moves
all
concerning
having
students
compare
their
ideas
to
other
students’
ideas
• Do
you
understand
what
Adrian
did?
• Do
you
agree?
• Is
your
approach
the
same
or
different?
• Point
to
the
solu;on
that
is
like
your
own
• Can
you
explain
what
he
did?
• More
important
than
the
ini;al
move
for
how
students
engaged
with
others’
ideas
was
how
the
teacher
followed
up
to
press
students
to
make
their
thinking
explicit
11
12. Supporting engagement
T
directed
students
to
discuss
answers
and
strategies
with
each
other
(norm
moves)
• You
are
not
talking
to
me,
points
to
the
class,
you
have
to
convince
them
• Emmy
is
not
convinced
yet
so
lets
see
if
we
can
get
some
more
ideas
• Carlos
are
you
paying
a_en;on,
you
want
to
see
if
you
agree
with
her
13. Supporting engagement
T
asks
students
to
elaborate
on
answers
and
strategies
(to
make
it
possible
for
others
to
a_end
to
its
detail)
• asks
specfic
ques;ons
that
require
students
to
a_end
to
the
detail
• asking
students
to
discuss
specific,
centrally
important
steps
embedded
in
their
strategies
14. Supporting engagement
T
posi;ons
students
to
par;cipate
in
another’s
thinking
• Selects
strategies
that
are
different
to
be
shared
with
the
whole
class
• Have
more
than
one
set
of
work
shared
and
explained
on
the
board
for
each
problem
• Asks
students
to
offer
sugges;ons
to
each
others
strategies
• Did
you
do
it
the
same
way
–
how
is
it
the
same?
• I
love
what
you
did…..
Look
at
this
Lily,
because
Cole
is
at
the
same
place
where
you
are.”
• Cris
maybe
it
will
help
if
you
listen
to
someone
else
and
then
try
again
15. Disrupting existing cultural practice
• Exis;ng
prac;ce,
expected,
experienced
• Dinner
;me
conversa;on
• Teachers,
students
and
families
all
have
ways
they
are
used
to
doing
school
math
• Classrooms,
schools,
districts
• Requires
renego;a;on
rather
than
telling
16. Create
a
space
to
begin…
Count by 1, start 180, count to 230
Count by 7/8
Count by .004 start at 53.280
Count by 10 start 66, count to 266
Count by .99, start at 1
Count by 2, start at 0
Count by 11, start at -77
17. One
of
these
things
is
not
like
the
others…
Listen…
replace
your
talk
with
another
move
23. Productive struggle for each student
• Challenge
our
assump;ons
about
student
par;cipa;on
• Find
the
produc;ve
–
what
students
have
communicated
• Make
explicit
what
it
means
to
par;cipate
(norms)
• Support
it
(follow
up)
• Watch
for
how
the
status
quo
limits
opportuni;es…find
ways
to
challenge
it