Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Transforming Bihar Agriculture for Improving Food Security -Challenges and Opportunities 
P K Joshi 
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Consultation Workshop on 
‘A Food Secure Bihar: Challenges and Way Forward’ 
Supported by SDC for a project on India-Food Security Portal 
6 August 2014, Patna, Bihar
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Issues covered 
1.Identify opportunities for higher, sustainable and inclusive agricultural growth 
2.Propose interventions for transforming agriculture and sequence priorities
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Key characteristics of Bihar agriculture 
Abundant water; abundant sun shine; abundant labour 
Concurrent twin problems of drought and flood 
High poverty and acute under-nourishment
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Smallholder agriculture 
0% 
10% 
20% 
30% 
40% 
50% 
60% 
70% 
80% 
90% 
100% 
Holdings 
Area 
89.6 
53 
6.7 
19.6 
3 
18.2 
0.7 
9.3 
<1.0 ha 
1-2 ha 
2-4 ha 
>4.0 ha 
Tiny size of holding 
0.43 ha in 2005/06 
0.75 ha in 1995/96 
<0.5 ha: 72% holdings commanding 27% area 
0.16 ha of < 0.5 ha 
<1.0 ha: 90% holdings 
Commands 50% area 
Joint holdings (13%) 
<0.5 ha: 12% holdings 
10 ha>: 40% holdings
International Food Policy Research Institute 
How to unleashing opportunities? 
4 pronged strategy 
Innovations 
Institutions 
Incentives 
Infrastructure 
Harness untapped yield reservoir 
Leverage power of improved technologies 
Utilize fallow lands 
Promote agridiversification & agro-processing 
High-value & remunerative commodities 
Labor absorbing & water efficient commodities
International Food Policy Research Institute 
1. Bridge the yield gapsRice yield gaps: FLD and sate average (t/ha) 
Yield gap: 131-300% 
FLD yield: 6.29 t/ha 
State avg: 1.55 t/ha 
0.5 t/ha in Bhagalpur to 2.9 t/ha in Bhojpur 
Rajendra Mahsuri-1; Rajendra Sweta 
Swarna-Sub 1for flood- prone areas
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Yield gaps contt… 
Wheat yield gaps 
86%: ranging from 70% in zone III to 158% in zone II 
Maize yield gaps 
Rainy season: 103-141% 
Causes of high yield gaps 
High uncertainty and yield risks 
Non-availability of improved varieties 
Low seed replacement rates 
Low and imbalance fertilize use
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Yield gaps in dairy sectorMilk yield l/animal/year 
Items 
Crossbred 
Indigenous 
Buffalo 
Experiment station yield (Maximum) 
7275 
2768 
3200 
Attainable yield (Maximum) 
3386 
1589 
2610 
Average actual farm Yield 
1541 
910 
1560 
Yield gap I 
3889 
1179 
590 
Yield gap II 
1845 
679 
1050 
Yield gap I % of Experiment station yield 
79 
67 
51 
Yield gap II % of attainable 
54 
43 
40
International Food Policy Research Institute 
2. Connect invention to innovation: potential of hybrid rice 
Yield range, t/ha 
Average yield, t/ha 
Districts 
< 5.00 
4.67 
West Singhbhun (4.81); Dumka (4.29); Chatra (4.92) 
5.0 –6.0 
5.75 
Ranchi (5.72); Godde (5.64); Koderne (5.90) 
6.0 –7.0 
6.33 
Lohardaga (6.03); Shibganj (6.89); Palamau (6.06) 
> 7.00 
7.43 
Bokaro (7.54); Gharwa (7.06); Dhanbad (7.98); Pakur (7.07); East Singhbhum (7.54)
International Food Policy Research Institute 
3. Emerging hybrid maize in Bihar (yields t/ha) 
1.72.412.633.185.666.6601234567RainyWinterLocalCompositeHybrids
International Food Policy Research Institute 
4. Climate smart agriculture: farmers’ preferences to various technology interventions 
Bihar 
1.Laser land Levelling 
2.Rain water conservation 
3.Systems of Rice Intensification 
4.Green manuring 
5.Crop Diversification 
6.Crop Insurance
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Investment and its impact on crop sector 
Item 
Unit 
Current 
20% Inv 
% Change 
Production 
m t 
10.89 
17.11 
57.00 
Income 
bRs 
107.00 
135.30 
26.00 
Employment 
m days 
403 
435 
8.00 
Water use 
000 m c m 
33.45 
22.43 
-33.00 
Income LS 
bRs 
35.00 
53.86 
53.00 
Emission 
M t CO2 eq 
14.80 
13.26 
-10.00
International Food Policy Research Institute 
5. Harness potential of rice-fallow 
Extent of rabi-fallow area 
1.2 
1.7 
2.2 
4.4 
9.5 
11.6 
0 
2 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
Rice-fallow area, m ha 
Orissa 
W Bengal 
Bihar 
MP 
4 States 
India 
31 
37 37 
78 
47 
38 
0 
20 
40 
60 
80 
Rabi fallow as of 
kharif rice. % 
Orissa 
W Bengal 
Bihar 
MP 
4 States 
India 
18 10 
15 
38 19 
Orissa W Bengal Bihar MP Other
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Constraints to use rice-fallow lands 
Abiotic 
Low residual moisture (91-97%); terminal drought (63-78%) 
Crop improvement 
Lack of short duration pulses and rice varieties (64-97%); pest problems (30-62%) 
Resource constraints 
Lack of inputs and cash to buy seeds and other inputs (>90%) 
Access to information about varieties and management 
Source of information: 88-97% by NGOs & 14-23% by extension staff 
Grazing lands 
Crop damage due to grazing (almost 100%) 
Missing markets 
High production risk (22-60%)and price risk (18-46%)
International Food Policy Research Institute 
6. Agricultural diversification: Share of food commodities in value of agricultural output, % 
1990/ 
91 
2000/ 01 
2008/09 
Paddy 
20 
13 
11 
Wheat 
14 
11 
9 
Maize 
3 
3 
2 
Pulses 
7 
3 
2 
F & Veg 
14 
36 
24 
L’stock 
30 
25 
42 
Others 
12 
9 
10 
Diversification towards livestock sector 
F & V and L’stockshares 66% in VOAO 
Declining size of holdings 
Rising demands 
COMFED (dairy) 
Membership up 
17.282 m in 1999/00 
48.96 m in 2010/11 
Milk collection up 
281.08 thkg/day in 1999/00 
608.38 thkg/day in 2006-07
International Food Policy Research Institute 
7. Jute and Mesta: promising crops in changing scenario 
State-wise cultivated Area (Million Ha) under 'Jute & Mesta' in India during year 2009-10 
West Bengal, 0.62, 69% 
Bihar, 0.14, 15% 
Assam, 0.07, 8% 
Others, 0.08, 8% 
State-wise Production of Jute & Mesta (Million bales of 180 Kg each) 
West Bengal, 9.40, 80% 
Bihar, 1.28, 11% 
Assam, 0.74, 6% 
Others, 0.40, 3% 
Area (Million Ha), Production (10 Million bales of 180 Kgs. each) of Jute & Mesta at All- 
India level during period 1950-51 to 2009-10 
0.00 
0.20 
0.40 
0.60 
0.80 
1.00 
1.20 
1.40 
1.60 
1950-51 
1952-53 
1954-55 
1956-57 
1958-59 
1960-61 
1962-63 
1964-65 
1966-67 
1968-69 
1970-71 
1972-73 
1974-75 
1976-77 
1978-79 
1980-81 
1982-83 
1984-85 
1986-87 
1988-89 
1990-91 
1992-93 
1994-95 
1996-97 
1998-99 
2000-01 
2002-03 
2004-05 
2006-07 
2008-09 
2010-11* 
Years 
Area and Production 
0 
500 
1000 
1500 
2000 
2500 
Yield 
Area (Million) Production (10 Million Bales of 180 kgs. each) Yield (Kg/Ha) 
Source: Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 201, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Global scenario of Jute Production 
Production of Jute in the World durign year 2010 
Thousand Tonnes % 
India 1743.0 57.0 
Bangladesh 1200.6 39.3 
China 40.0 1.3 
Uzbekistan 21.7 0.7 
Nepal 21.0 0.7 
Others 29.6 1.0 
World 3055.9 100.0 
Production 
Country 
Production of Jute (Millions Tonnes) in India, Bangladesh and China during period 
1961 to 2010 
0.00 
0.50 
1.00 
1.50 
2.00 
2.50 
1961 
1963 
1965 
1967 
1969 
1971 
1973 
1975 
1977 
1979 
1981 
1983 
1985 
1987 
1989 
1991 
1993 
1995 
1997 
1999 
2001 
2003 
2005 
2007 
2009 
Years 
Production (Million Tonnes) 
Bangladesh China India 
Source: FAOStat
International Food Policy Research Institute 
8. Prospects for agro-processing sector 
Bihar food market: US$ 9 billion & expected to grow to US$ 19 billion by 2015 (110% increase) 
45% is processed food market 
Prospects for cereals, pulses, oilseeds 
Rice milling installed capacity is inadequate 
Maize processing insignificant 
Starch, corn oil, corn flacks, poultry feed 
Fruits, vegetables, sugarcane, potato, tobacco, etc 
Fruit juice, fruit pulp, squash, pickles, tomato sauces/pulp/paste, jam/jelly, fruit beverages 
Makhanaprocessing
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Constraints in agro-processing sector 
Agro-processing is with the unorganized sector 
Absence of pre-processing facilities 
Pre-cooling, cooling, grading, sorting, pack houses 
High post-harvest losses 
Papaya: 30-50%; Banana: 15-25%; Cabbage: 41-44%; Potato, Brinjal, Onion, cauliflower: 33% 
Power is a major constraint
II 
Interventions for Accelerating Sustainable Agricultural Production
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Needed interventions and way forward 
More investment in agriculture 
Flood control, irrigation, drainage management; & land development 
Drainage canal from north to south 
Promote dairy sector (veterinary hospitals & AI facilities) 
Develop markets 
Agricultural research and extension 
Reprioritize research agenda 
More multi-disciplinary research in farming system mode at sub- regional level 
Focus on management of natural resources 
Priority for rain water management 
Management practices for alleviating abioticconstraints
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Interventions…. 
Connect invention and innovation 
Massive seed production program: Hybrids (maize, vegetables) 
Saplings of fruit trees 
Promote climate smart agriculture 
Provide incentives to connect farmers with markets 
Special agriculture zone 
Cereals, fruits, vegetables, poultry, fish 
Develop markets 
Enforce regulatory mechanisms for assured prices 
Attract corporate sector for developing agro-processing 
Strengthen institutions 
Land reforms (consolidation, ownership….) 
Pro-poor (smallholder agriculture): collective production and marketing, contract farming, farmers’ cooperatives 
Strengthen credit, insurance, services, and extension services
International Food Policy Research Institute 
Bihar marching for transformation for improving food security 
Thank you

More Related Content

IFPRI - Food Secure Bihar, P K Joshi, IFPRI

  • 1. Transforming Bihar Agriculture for Improving Food Security -Challenges and Opportunities P K Joshi International Food Policy Research Institute Consultation Workshop on ‘A Food Secure Bihar: Challenges and Way Forward’ Supported by SDC for a project on India-Food Security Portal 6 August 2014, Patna, Bihar
  • 2. International Food Policy Research Institute Issues covered 1.Identify opportunities for higher, sustainable and inclusive agricultural growth 2.Propose interventions for transforming agriculture and sequence priorities
  • 3. International Food Policy Research Institute Key characteristics of Bihar agriculture Abundant water; abundant sun shine; abundant labour Concurrent twin problems of drought and flood High poverty and acute under-nourishment
  • 4. International Food Policy Research Institute Smallholder agriculture 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Holdings Area 89.6 53 6.7 19.6 3 18.2 0.7 9.3 <1.0 ha 1-2 ha 2-4 ha >4.0 ha Tiny size of holding 0.43 ha in 2005/06 0.75 ha in 1995/96 <0.5 ha: 72% holdings commanding 27% area 0.16 ha of < 0.5 ha <1.0 ha: 90% holdings Commands 50% area Joint holdings (13%) <0.5 ha: 12% holdings 10 ha>: 40% holdings
  • 5. International Food Policy Research Institute How to unleashing opportunities? 4 pronged strategy Innovations Institutions Incentives Infrastructure Harness untapped yield reservoir Leverage power of improved technologies Utilize fallow lands Promote agridiversification & agro-processing High-value & remunerative commodities Labor absorbing & water efficient commodities
  • 6. International Food Policy Research Institute 1. Bridge the yield gapsRice yield gaps: FLD and sate average (t/ha) Yield gap: 131-300% FLD yield: 6.29 t/ha State avg: 1.55 t/ha 0.5 t/ha in Bhagalpur to 2.9 t/ha in Bhojpur Rajendra Mahsuri-1; Rajendra Sweta Swarna-Sub 1for flood- prone areas
  • 7. International Food Policy Research Institute Yield gaps contt… Wheat yield gaps 86%: ranging from 70% in zone III to 158% in zone II Maize yield gaps Rainy season: 103-141% Causes of high yield gaps High uncertainty and yield risks Non-availability of improved varieties Low seed replacement rates Low and imbalance fertilize use
  • 8. International Food Policy Research Institute Yield gaps in dairy sectorMilk yield l/animal/year Items Crossbred Indigenous Buffalo Experiment station yield (Maximum) 7275 2768 3200 Attainable yield (Maximum) 3386 1589 2610 Average actual farm Yield 1541 910 1560 Yield gap I 3889 1179 590 Yield gap II 1845 679 1050 Yield gap I % of Experiment station yield 79 67 51 Yield gap II % of attainable 54 43 40
  • 9. International Food Policy Research Institute 2. Connect invention to innovation: potential of hybrid rice Yield range, t/ha Average yield, t/ha Districts < 5.00 4.67 West Singhbhun (4.81); Dumka (4.29); Chatra (4.92) 5.0 –6.0 5.75 Ranchi (5.72); Godde (5.64); Koderne (5.90) 6.0 –7.0 6.33 Lohardaga (6.03); Shibganj (6.89); Palamau (6.06) > 7.00 7.43 Bokaro (7.54); Gharwa (7.06); Dhanbad (7.98); Pakur (7.07); East Singhbhum (7.54)
  • 10. International Food Policy Research Institute 3. Emerging hybrid maize in Bihar (yields t/ha) 1.72.412.633.185.666.6601234567RainyWinterLocalCompositeHybrids
  • 11. International Food Policy Research Institute 4. Climate smart agriculture: farmers’ preferences to various technology interventions Bihar 1.Laser land Levelling 2.Rain water conservation 3.Systems of Rice Intensification 4.Green manuring 5.Crop Diversification 6.Crop Insurance
  • 12. International Food Policy Research Institute Investment and its impact on crop sector Item Unit Current 20% Inv % Change Production m t 10.89 17.11 57.00 Income bRs 107.00 135.30 26.00 Employment m days 403 435 8.00 Water use 000 m c m 33.45 22.43 -33.00 Income LS bRs 35.00 53.86 53.00 Emission M t CO2 eq 14.80 13.26 -10.00
  • 13. International Food Policy Research Institute 5. Harness potential of rice-fallow Extent of rabi-fallow area 1.2 1.7 2.2 4.4 9.5 11.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Rice-fallow area, m ha Orissa W Bengal Bihar MP 4 States India 31 37 37 78 47 38 0 20 40 60 80 Rabi fallow as of kharif rice. % Orissa W Bengal Bihar MP 4 States India 18 10 15 38 19 Orissa W Bengal Bihar MP Other
  • 14. International Food Policy Research Institute Constraints to use rice-fallow lands Abiotic Low residual moisture (91-97%); terminal drought (63-78%) Crop improvement Lack of short duration pulses and rice varieties (64-97%); pest problems (30-62%) Resource constraints Lack of inputs and cash to buy seeds and other inputs (>90%) Access to information about varieties and management Source of information: 88-97% by NGOs & 14-23% by extension staff Grazing lands Crop damage due to grazing (almost 100%) Missing markets High production risk (22-60%)and price risk (18-46%)
  • 15. International Food Policy Research Institute 6. Agricultural diversification: Share of food commodities in value of agricultural output, % 1990/ 91 2000/ 01 2008/09 Paddy 20 13 11 Wheat 14 11 9 Maize 3 3 2 Pulses 7 3 2 F & Veg 14 36 24 L’stock 30 25 42 Others 12 9 10 Diversification towards livestock sector F & V and L’stockshares 66% in VOAO Declining size of holdings Rising demands COMFED (dairy) Membership up 17.282 m in 1999/00 48.96 m in 2010/11 Milk collection up 281.08 thkg/day in 1999/00 608.38 thkg/day in 2006-07
  • 16. International Food Policy Research Institute 7. Jute and Mesta: promising crops in changing scenario State-wise cultivated Area (Million Ha) under 'Jute & Mesta' in India during year 2009-10 West Bengal, 0.62, 69% Bihar, 0.14, 15% Assam, 0.07, 8% Others, 0.08, 8% State-wise Production of Jute & Mesta (Million bales of 180 Kg each) West Bengal, 9.40, 80% Bihar, 1.28, 11% Assam, 0.74, 6% Others, 0.40, 3% Area (Million Ha), Production (10 Million bales of 180 Kgs. each) of Jute & Mesta at All- India level during period 1950-51 to 2009-10 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1950-51 1952-53 1954-55 1956-57 1958-59 1960-61 1962-63 1964-65 1966-67 1968-69 1970-71 1972-73 1974-75 1976-77 1978-79 1980-81 1982-83 1984-85 1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 1992-93 1994-95 1996-97 1998-99 2000-01 2002-03 2004-05 2006-07 2008-09 2010-11* Years Area and Production 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 Yield Area (Million) Production (10 Million Bales of 180 kgs. each) Yield (Kg/Ha) Source: Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 201, Ministry of Agriculture, GoI
  • 17. International Food Policy Research Institute Global scenario of Jute Production Production of Jute in the World durign year 2010 Thousand Tonnes % India 1743.0 57.0 Bangladesh 1200.6 39.3 China 40.0 1.3 Uzbekistan 21.7 0.7 Nepal 21.0 0.7 Others 29.6 1.0 World 3055.9 100.0 Production Country Production of Jute (Millions Tonnes) in India, Bangladesh and China during period 1961 to 2010 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 Years Production (Million Tonnes) Bangladesh China India Source: FAOStat
  • 18. International Food Policy Research Institute 8. Prospects for agro-processing sector Bihar food market: US$ 9 billion & expected to grow to US$ 19 billion by 2015 (110% increase) 45% is processed food market Prospects for cereals, pulses, oilseeds Rice milling installed capacity is inadequate Maize processing insignificant Starch, corn oil, corn flacks, poultry feed Fruits, vegetables, sugarcane, potato, tobacco, etc Fruit juice, fruit pulp, squash, pickles, tomato sauces/pulp/paste, jam/jelly, fruit beverages Makhanaprocessing
  • 19. International Food Policy Research Institute Constraints in agro-processing sector Agro-processing is with the unorganized sector Absence of pre-processing facilities Pre-cooling, cooling, grading, sorting, pack houses High post-harvest losses Papaya: 30-50%; Banana: 15-25%; Cabbage: 41-44%; Potato, Brinjal, Onion, cauliflower: 33% Power is a major constraint
  • 20. II Interventions for Accelerating Sustainable Agricultural Production
  • 21. International Food Policy Research Institute Needed interventions and way forward More investment in agriculture Flood control, irrigation, drainage management; & land development Drainage canal from north to south Promote dairy sector (veterinary hospitals & AI facilities) Develop markets Agricultural research and extension Reprioritize research agenda More multi-disciplinary research in farming system mode at sub- regional level Focus on management of natural resources Priority for rain water management Management practices for alleviating abioticconstraints
  • 22. International Food Policy Research Institute Interventions…. Connect invention and innovation Massive seed production program: Hybrids (maize, vegetables) Saplings of fruit trees Promote climate smart agriculture Provide incentives to connect farmers with markets Special agriculture zone Cereals, fruits, vegetables, poultry, fish Develop markets Enforce regulatory mechanisms for assured prices Attract corporate sector for developing agro-processing Strengthen institutions Land reforms (consolidation, ownership….) Pro-poor (smallholder agriculture): collective production and marketing, contract farming, farmers’ cooperatives Strengthen credit, insurance, services, and extension services
  • 23. International Food Policy Research Institute Bihar marching for transformation for improving food security Thank you