Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Integrating Digital Citizenship into the Classroom
with MyBigCampus




Anastasia Trekles
Clinical Associate Professor, Purdue University Calumet
Board Member, Indiana Computer Educators (ISTE Affiliate)
atrekles@purdue.edu
Outline

   Introductions and goals

   Digital citizenship in your school and classroom

   MyBigCampus (MBC) for digital citizenship best practices support

   More information
Objectives
By the end of the session you will be able to:
    Discuss the issues between school network filtering and 21st century education
    Identify the nine elements of Digital Citizenship
    Describe why MyBigCampus is a useful tool for teachers, schools, students, and
    parents with regard to Internet safety and digital learning
    Use MyBigCampus to collaborate with students and other teachers
    Create assignments, quizzes, and lesson bundles with MyBigCampus
    Manage cloud-based documents, profiles, and interactions within MyBigCampus
When we limit kids’ access and ignore the problem,
they look at school “computing” like this...
Or worse...
Learning doesn’t happen when students are bored - we know
this already!
So we do what we can to engage them, but are school policies
holding us back?
Students generally will use the Internet the way they want to,
and access the sites they want to, while away from home (see
Yan, 2009).
They also spend a lot of time trying to circumvent our best
efforts to “protect” them online at school.
WHY?
Don’t we want this instead?
What does it mean to be a “Digital Citizen” anyhow?

       Nine themes of Digital Citizenship (http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/
       Nine_Elements.html)
            Access: Full participation in society
            Commerce: Buying and selling of goods
            Communication: Exchange of information
            Literacy: Understanding appropriate uses of technology
            Etiquette: Standards of conduct and procedure
            Law: Responsibility for actions and deeds
            Rights and Responsibilities: Understanding our digital freedoms
            Wellness: Physical and psychological well-being in the online world
            Security and Self-Protection: Precautions to guarantee safety
Why Schools Find it Difficult to Teach
Digital Citizenship
      The Children’s Internet Protection
     Act (CIPA) is the primary law
     enforcing filtering on school
     networks
     Public schools and libraries must
     be CIPA-compliant in order to
     receive Federal E-Rate funds
     40% of libraries employ CIPA-
     required filtering on their networks
     100% of schools employ those          (See Jaeger & Yan, 2009)
     same filters
(Mis)Understanding CIPA
CIPA dictates that filters block visual imagery on the Internet that is:
     Obscene
     Contains child pornography
     Is “harmful to minors”

CIPA compliance (and compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act
[COPPA]) requires an Internet safety policy that addresses:
     Limitations on access to inappropriate materials online
     Safety and security when using electronic mail, chat rooms, and other communication forums
     Unauthorized access and circumventing of filters through hacking
     Dissemination of personal information of minors
(Mis)Understanding CIPA
CIPA does NOT:
    Have any impact on teachers or other adults at the school (or library)
    Prohibit teachers from overriding filtering of sites when needed for
    educational purposes
    Require the blocking of social media sites like YouTube, Wikipedia, or
    Facebook
    Refer to “inappropriate” text, only imagery
    Address intellectual property, cyberbullying, plagiarism, or any other
    ethical issues related to Internet use
Digital Citizenship
Hollandsworth, Dowdy,
and Donovan (2011)
provide an interesting
study of what is actually
taught at many schools
Many are not following
state standards, and/or
concentrate only on
certain things
Online is Different
                Can we really control everything
                kids see online?
                Many schools realize that they can’t
                Some are implementing digital
                safety and citizenship curriculum
                due to state standards and new E-
                Rate regulations
                But what does this curriculum look
                like?
Elements of Complete DC
In order to incorporate digital citizenship themes (http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/
Nine_Elements.html) more fully, it is necessary to:
     Allow full participation and access to communication and sharing to happen online
     Help students understand context and what is and is not appropriate to share, use, and
     remix
     Ensure that students understand issues of public versus private information
     Ensure that students understand the difference between advertisements and real content
     Allow students to come to their own conclusions, and help them reflect on why they made
     those choices
     Enforce reasonable consequences of inappropriate actions
State Core Standards
The Common Core Standards adopted by many states stress digital
literacy and the ability to comprehend and apply information in a
variety of ways from grade 2 on up (http://
www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/key-points-in-english-
language-arts)
So, if we are not exposing students to opportunities to make
important discriminations and decisions in the real online space that
they occupy beyond school, then we are doing them a disservice
Suggested Reading
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, 91 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6506 (2010).
Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106–554, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6801, 6777, 9134 and 47 U.S.C. § 254.
Cooke, L. (2007). Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation. Journal of Information
Science, 33(3), 360-376. doi: 10.1177/0165551506072163
Frechette, J. (2005). Cyber-democracy or cyber-hegemony? exploring the political and economic structures of the
internet as an alternative source of information. Library Trends, 53(4), 555-575, 664.
Hollandsworth, R., Dowdy, L., & Donovan, J. (2011). Digital citizenship in K-12: It takes a village. TechTrends, 55(4),
37-47. doi: 10.1007/s11528-011-0510-z
Houghton-Jan, S. (2010). Internet filtering. Library Technology Reports, 46(8), 25-33, 45.
Hunter, C.D. (2000). Internet filter effectiveness – Testing over- and underinclusive blocking decisions of four popular
web filters. Social Science Computer Review, 18(2), 214-222. doi: 10.1177/089443930001800209
Jaeger, P. T., & Yan, Z. (2009). One law with two outcomes: Comparing the implementation of CIPA in public libraries
and schools. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(1), 6-14.
Suggested Reading
Lessig, L. (1999). The law of the horse: What cyberlaw might teach. Harvard Law Review, 1999(113), 501-549.
Lazarinis, F. (2010). Online risks obstructing safe internet access for students. The Electronic Library, 28(1),
157-170. doi: 10.1108/0246047011023441
Jukes, I., McCain, T., & Crockett, L. (2011). Education and the role of the educator in the future. Phi Delta
Kappan, 92(4), 15-21.
Jansen, B. A. (2010). Internet filtering 2.0: Checking intellectual freedom and participative practices at the
schoolhouse door. Knowledge Quest, 39(1), 46-53.
Oxley, C. (2010). Digital citizenship: Developing an ethical and responsible online culture. International School
Librarianship: Selected Papers from the IASL Annual Conference, 1-11.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5), 1–5. Retrieved from http://
www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-
%20Part1.pdf.
Suggested Reading
Preston, C.B. (2007). Zoning the internet: A new approach to protecting children online. Brigham Young
University Law Review, 2007(6), 1417-1469.
Ramaswami, R. (2010). Nothing to LOL about. THE Journal, 37(6), 24-30.
Rodden, K. (2003). The Children’s Internet Protection Act in public schools: The government stepping on
parents’ toes? Fordham Law Review, 71(5), 2141-2175.
Weigel, C., James, C., & Gardner, H. (2009). Learning: Peering backward and looking forward in the
digital era. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1162/ijlm.2009.0005
Willard, N. (2010). Teach them to swim. Knowledge Quest: Journal of the American Association of School
Librarians, 39(1), 54-61.
Yan, Z. (2009). Differences in high school and college students’ basic knowledge and perceived education
of Internet safety: Do high school students really benefit from the Children’s Internet Protection Act?
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.007
Web Resources
Balanced Filtering: http://balancedfiltering.org/
Speed of Creativity: http://www.speedofcreativity.org
Marc Prensky’s writings: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing
Camille Maydonik’s portfolio: http://eportfolio.camilleteaches.com/artifacts/
researchpapers/the-importance-of-digital-citizenship/
CIPA Overview: http://www.fcc.gov/guides/childrens-internet-protection-act
Social Media tips from the Federal Trade Commission: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/
pubs/consumer/tech/tec14.shtm
iSafe: http://isafe.org

More Related Content

Intro - digitalcitizens

  • 1. Integrating Digital Citizenship into the Classroom with MyBigCampus Anastasia Trekles Clinical Associate Professor, Purdue University Calumet Board Member, Indiana Computer Educators (ISTE Affiliate) atrekles@purdue.edu
  • 2. Outline Introductions and goals Digital citizenship in your school and classroom MyBigCampus (MBC) for digital citizenship best practices support More information
  • 3. Objectives By the end of the session you will be able to: Discuss the issues between school network filtering and 21st century education Identify the nine elements of Digital Citizenship Describe why MyBigCampus is a useful tool for teachers, schools, students, and parents with regard to Internet safety and digital learning Use MyBigCampus to collaborate with students and other teachers Create assignments, quizzes, and lesson bundles with MyBigCampus Manage cloud-based documents, profiles, and interactions within MyBigCampus
  • 4. When we limit kids’ access and ignore the problem, they look at school “computing” like this...
  • 6. Learning doesn’t happen when students are bored - we know this already! So we do what we can to engage them, but are school policies holding us back?
  • 7. Students generally will use the Internet the way they want to, and access the sites they want to, while away from home (see Yan, 2009). They also spend a lot of time trying to circumvent our best efforts to “protect” them online at school. WHY?
  • 8. Don’t we want this instead?
  • 9. What does it mean to be a “Digital Citizen” anyhow? Nine themes of Digital Citizenship (http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/ Nine_Elements.html) Access: Full participation in society Commerce: Buying and selling of goods Communication: Exchange of information Literacy: Understanding appropriate uses of technology Etiquette: Standards of conduct and procedure Law: Responsibility for actions and deeds Rights and Responsibilities: Understanding our digital freedoms Wellness: Physical and psychological well-being in the online world Security and Self-Protection: Precautions to guarantee safety
  • 10. Why Schools Find it Difficult to Teach Digital Citizenship The Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) is the primary law enforcing filtering on school networks Public schools and libraries must be CIPA-compliant in order to receive Federal E-Rate funds 40% of libraries employ CIPA- required filtering on their networks 100% of schools employ those (See Jaeger & Yan, 2009) same filters
  • 11. (Mis)Understanding CIPA CIPA dictates that filters block visual imagery on the Internet that is: Obscene Contains child pornography Is “harmful to minors” CIPA compliance (and compliance with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act [COPPA]) requires an Internet safety policy that addresses: Limitations on access to inappropriate materials online Safety and security when using electronic mail, chat rooms, and other communication forums Unauthorized access and circumventing of filters through hacking Dissemination of personal information of minors
  • 12. (Mis)Understanding CIPA CIPA does NOT: Have any impact on teachers or other adults at the school (or library) Prohibit teachers from overriding filtering of sites when needed for educational purposes Require the blocking of social media sites like YouTube, Wikipedia, or Facebook Refer to “inappropriate” text, only imagery Address intellectual property, cyberbullying, plagiarism, or any other ethical issues related to Internet use
  • 13. Digital Citizenship Hollandsworth, Dowdy, and Donovan (2011) provide an interesting study of what is actually taught at many schools Many are not following state standards, and/or concentrate only on certain things
  • 14. Online is Different Can we really control everything kids see online? Many schools realize that they can’t Some are implementing digital safety and citizenship curriculum due to state standards and new E- Rate regulations But what does this curriculum look like?
  • 15. Elements of Complete DC In order to incorporate digital citizenship themes (http://www.digitalcitizenship.net/ Nine_Elements.html) more fully, it is necessary to: Allow full participation and access to communication and sharing to happen online Help students understand context and what is and is not appropriate to share, use, and remix Ensure that students understand issues of public versus private information Ensure that students understand the difference between advertisements and real content Allow students to come to their own conclusions, and help them reflect on why they made those choices Enforce reasonable consequences of inappropriate actions
  • 16. State Core Standards The Common Core Standards adopted by many states stress digital literacy and the ability to comprehend and apply information in a variety of ways from grade 2 on up (http:// www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/key-points-in-english- language-arts) So, if we are not exposing students to opportunities to make important discriminations and decisions in the real online space that they occupy beyond school, then we are doing them a disservice
  • 17. Suggested Reading Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, 91 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6506 (2010). Children’s Internet Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106–554, 20 U.S.C. §§ 6801, 6777, 9134 and 47 U.S.C. § 254. Cooke, L. (2007). Controlling the net: European approaches to content and access regulation. Journal of Information Science, 33(3), 360-376. doi: 10.1177/0165551506072163 Frechette, J. (2005). Cyber-democracy or cyber-hegemony? exploring the political and economic structures of the internet as an alternative source of information. Library Trends, 53(4), 555-575, 664. Hollandsworth, R., Dowdy, L., & Donovan, J. (2011). Digital citizenship in K-12: It takes a village. TechTrends, 55(4), 37-47. doi: 10.1007/s11528-011-0510-z Houghton-Jan, S. (2010). Internet filtering. Library Technology Reports, 46(8), 25-33, 45. Hunter, C.D. (2000). Internet filter effectiveness – Testing over- and underinclusive blocking decisions of four popular web filters. Social Science Computer Review, 18(2), 214-222. doi: 10.1177/089443930001800209 Jaeger, P. T., & Yan, Z. (2009). One law with two outcomes: Comparing the implementation of CIPA in public libraries and schools. Information Technology and Libraries, 28(1), 6-14.
  • 18. Suggested Reading Lessig, L. (1999). The law of the horse: What cyberlaw might teach. Harvard Law Review, 1999(113), 501-549. Lazarinis, F. (2010). Online risks obstructing safe internet access for students. The Electronic Library, 28(1), 157-170. doi: 10.1108/0246047011023441 Jukes, I., McCain, T., & Crockett, L. (2011). Education and the role of the educator in the future. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(4), 15-21. Jansen, B. A. (2010). Internet filtering 2.0: Checking intellectual freedom and participative practices at the schoolhouse door. Knowledge Quest, 39(1), 46-53. Oxley, C. (2010). Digital citizenship: Developing an ethical and responsible online culture. International School Librarianship: Selected Papers from the IASL Annual Conference, 1-11. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon 9(5), 1–5. Retrieved from http:// www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20- %20Part1.pdf.
  • 19. Suggested Reading Preston, C.B. (2007). Zoning the internet: A new approach to protecting children online. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007(6), 1417-1469. Ramaswami, R. (2010). Nothing to LOL about. THE Journal, 37(6), 24-30. Rodden, K. (2003). The Children’s Internet Protection Act in public schools: The government stepping on parents’ toes? Fordham Law Review, 71(5), 2141-2175. Weigel, C., James, C., & Gardner, H. (2009). Learning: Peering backward and looking forward in the digital era. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1162/ijlm.2009.0005 Willard, N. (2010). Teach them to swim. Knowledge Quest: Journal of the American Association of School Librarians, 39(1), 54-61. Yan, Z. (2009). Differences in high school and college students’ basic knowledge and perceived education of Internet safety: Do high school students really benefit from the Children’s Internet Protection Act? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 209-217. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.007
  • 20. Web Resources Balanced Filtering: http://balancedfiltering.org/ Speed of Creativity: http://www.speedofcreativity.org Marc Prensky’s writings: http://www.marcprensky.com/writing Camille Maydonik’s portfolio: http://eportfolio.camilleteaches.com/artifacts/ researchpapers/the-importance-of-digital-citizenship/ CIPA Overview: http://www.fcc.gov/guides/childrens-internet-protection-act Social Media tips from the Federal Trade Commission: http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/ pubs/consumer/tech/tec14.shtm iSafe: http://isafe.org

Editor's Notes

  1. \n
  2. \n
  3. \n
  4. \n
  5. \n
  6. \n
  7. \n
  8. \n
  9. \n
  10. \n
  11. \n
  12. \n
  13. \n
  14. \n
  15. \n
  16. \n
  17. \n
  18. \n
  19. \n
  20. \n