This document provides an introduction to climate-smart agriculture (CSA) in Busia County, Kenya. It defines CSA and its three objectives of sustainably increasing agricultural productivity and income, adapting and building resilience to climate change, and reducing and/or removing greenhouse gas emissions. It discusses CSA at the farm and landscape scales and provides examples of CSA practices and projects in Kenya. It also outlines Kenya's response to CSA through policies and programs. The document describes prioritizing CSA options through identifying the local context, available options, relevant outcomes, evaluating evidence on options' impacts, and choosing best-bet options based on the analysis.
3. What are the objectives of CSA?
Sustainably
increase
agricultural
productivity and
income
Reduce and/or
remove
greenhouse gas
emissions
Adapt and build
resilience to
climate change
5. Brief History of CSA
KEY EVENTS
2009: CSA IS
BORN
FAO & partners
broadly define
the approach
2014:
MOON
SHOT
UN Secretary
General sets goal
of reaching 500m
smallholders
2019: CSA
TURNS 10
?
2014 - x:
MASSIVE
MOBILIZATION
Billions of USD of
public and private
sector investment,
10s of Alliances, 10s of
countries
14. Examples of CSA in Kenya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niyB9-KqPyA
https://youtu.be/kaKqsio88iI?t=73
15. CSA FAQs
1. Does a practice need to do achieve all three pillars, productivity,
adaptation & mitigation?
Not necessarily. In developing countries, mitigation is seen as a co-benefit
rather than a requirement. Also, in a portfolio or landscape approach, some
practices could focus on productivity and resilience while others focus on
mitigation, as long as all objectives are being met in the entire area.
2. Isn’t this just the same as {sustainable agriculture, agroecology}?
CSA’s “equal” focus on productivity, resilience, and mitigation differentiates
it from other approaches, but it shares many characteristics with other
approaches to sustainable food security. CSA is also not prescriptive, but
must be tailored to the local context.
3. Other Questions?
19. Busia Funyula Nambal
e
Butula Teso
North
Teso
South
Budala
ngi
Crops
Livestock
Fisheries
Water
&
Irrigati
on
Mapping CSA in Busia County
20. Project Name:
Where: sub-counties, wards
Who: project partners? how many farmers?
What: what crops/animals? what
technologies/activities?
Status: on going? finished?
Results: any reports? outputs? where are they?
For each Project/Activity: Crops
Livestock
Fisheries
Water &
Irrigation
Mapping CSA in Busia County
21. Project Name:
Where: sub-counties, wards
Who: project partners? how many farmers?
What: what crops/animals? what
technologies/activities?
Status: on going? finished?
Results: any reports? outputs? where are they?
For each Project/Activity: Crops
Livestock
Fisheries
Water &
Irrigation
Mapping CSA in Busia County
23. The Challenge for CSA Programs
Many Practices Many Goals Many Contexts
MitigationResilience
Productivity
Of What?
Most common crops?
Most vulnerable crops?
For Whom?
Most farmers?
Most vulnerable farmers?
24. Bayala et al.
The Importance of Context
In a given farming system…
Some practices improve
outcomes
Others do not…
25. Pittelkow et al. 2014
Effect on Maize Yield (%)
Conservation Agriculture
The Importance of Context
For a given option…
It can improve outcomes in
some places
But not in others
28. Prioritization
CSA Options
Yield
Income
Soil Health
Gender Equity
Adoption Potential
etc..
Best-Best
Options
1.Identify the context
2.Identify the options
3.Identify the outcomes
4.Generate evidence
5.Evaluate the evidence
6.Choose the best-bet options
29. 1. Identify Context
Crops Livestock Fisheries
- For whom?
- Majority of farmers?
- Most vulnerable?
- Most likely to adopt change?
30. Crops
Drought-tolerant varieties
Access to weather info
Training farmers
Water Harvesting
Soil Water Conservation
IPM
Livestock
Breed Improvement
Vaccinations
Fodder Formulations
Pasture Conservation
Livelihood Diversification
• How were options identified?
• Are there other options that might be relevant?
• Where else could we look for options?
2. Identify Options
Fisheries
Fish ponds & linings
Improved feeding
Greenhouse fishing
Improved hatcheries
Cage culture
32. Trade-offs and Synergies
You may notice that some options have positive impacts for one outcome,
but neutral or negative impacts in others.
Increased Yield Inorganic Fertilizer GHG Emissions, Costs
Less erosion,
Improved soil quality,
mitigation
Agroforestry Lower yields
Increased resilience to
droughts
Irrigation High cost, high labor
demand
34. 4. Generate Evidence
For each Farming System x CSA option, we need to generate evidence
on the outcomes that we are interested in.
What kinds of evidence can we use?
Farmer’s Knowledge Scientific Experiments
38. Scientific Evidence
Thousands of studies have been done on potential CSA options in Africa
70
Practices
x 20
Indicators
Abstract/title review
Full text review
Key word search
Data extraction
+50,000
studies
1700 studies
40. 1. How does adding fertilizer
change maize yield?
2. How much variability is
there?
3. How confident can we be
in this result?
CSA & Cereal Yield in Semi-Arid
nic
Fertilizer
(e.g. NPK,
DAP, etc.)
Variability in Change
Mean Change in Yield
45. 5. Evaluate Evidence
In your subsector groups:
1. Examine the data available for CSA options
2. Is there anything you would add to your basket based on the data?
3. Is there anything you would take away?