Notes on Leadership In Organisation Behavior (Notes for BBA/B.com Students)
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
19 likes•17,996 views
this is the notes on leadership in organisation behavior.
Leadership can be defined as the ability of the management to make sound decisions and inspire others to perform well. It is the process of directing the behavior of others towards achieving a common goal. In short, leadership is getting things done through others.
it covers following points :-
1.Definition
2.Importance of ledership
3.Leader V/s Manager
4.Leadership Styles
5.Theories of leadership
1 of 9
More Related Content
Notes on Leadership In Organisation Behavior (Notes for BBA/B.com Students)
1. 1
Leadership
Leadership can be defined as the ability of the management to make
sound decisions and inspire others to perform well. It is the process of
directing the behavior of others towards achieving a common goal. In
short, leadership is getting things done through others.
Importance of Leadership
Leadership is very important in a firm as it leads to higher
performance by the team members.
It improves motivation and morale within the members.
It helps to respond to change.
Leadership facilitates organizational success by creating
responsibility and accountability among the members of the
organization.
It increases value in an organization.
LeaderV/s Manager
A leader is someone whom people follow or someone who guides or
directs others. A manager is someone who is responsible for directing
2. 2
and controlling the work and staff in an organization, or of a
department within it.
The main difference between the two is that a leader works by
example, while a manager dictates expectations. If a manager goes
against the rules, that will tarnish his position as a manager. If a
leader goes against the example he or she is trying to set, that will be
seen as a setback. Following are a few subtle differences between the
two −
A leader is an innovator and creator whereas a manager is a
commander.
A leader can’t be a manager but the opposite is possible, a
manager is more than a leader.
A leader does what is right, while the manager makes things
right.
A leader deals with change whereas a manager plans for a change.
A leader gives direction to do something whereas the manager
plans for everything that is to be done.
A leader encourages people whereas the manager controls people.
3. 3
A leader handles communication, credibility, and empowerment
whereas a manager deals with organizing and staffing.
LeadershipStyles
Different leadership styles exist in work environments. The culture
and goal of an organization determine which leadership style fits best.
Some organizations offer different leadership styles within an
organization, depending on the necessary tasks to complete and
departmental needs. We find five different leadership styles in the
corporate world. They are as follows
Laissez-Faire: A laissez-faire leader does not directly supervise
employees and fails to provide regular updates to those under his
supervision. Highly experienced and trained employees with
minimal requirement of supervision fall under the laissez-faire
leadership style. But, not all employees possess these features.
This leadership style blocks the production of employees needing
supervision. The laissez-faire style implements no leadership or
supervision efforts from managers, which can lead to poor
production, lack of control and increasing costs.
Autocratic: The autocratic leadership style permits managers to
make decisions alone without the input of others. Managers
4. 4
access total authority and impose their will on employees. No one
opposes the decisions of autocratic leaders. Countries like Cuba
and North Korea operate under the autocratic leadership style.
This leadership style benefits those who require direct
supervision. Creative employees who participate in group
functions detest this leadership style.
Participative: This is also known as the democratic leadership
style. It values the input of team members and peers, but the
responsibility of making the final decision rests with the
participative leader. Participative leadership motivates employee
morale because employees make contributions to the decision-
making process. It accounts to a feeling that their opinions
matter. When an organization needs to make changes within
itself, that is internally, the participative leadership style helps
employees accept changes easily as they play a role in the
process. This leadership style meets challenges when companies
need to make a decision in a short period of time.
Transactional: Transactional leadership style is formed by the
concept of reward and punishment. Transactional leaders believe
that the employee's performance is completely dependent on
5. 5
these two factors. When there is an encouragement, the workers
put in their best effort and the bonus is in monetary terms in
most of the cases. In case they fail to achieve the set target
they are given a negative appraisal. Transactional leaders pay
more attention to physical and security requirements of the
employees.
Transformational: Transformational leadership has the ability to
affect employee's perceptions through the returns that
organization gets in the form of human capital benefits. These
leaders have the ability to reap higher benefits by introducing
knowledge management processes, encouraging interpersonal
communication among employees and creating healthy
organizational culture. It helps in flourishing organizational
innovation by creating a participative environment or culture. It
promotes a culture where the employees have autonomy to speak
about their experiences and share knowledge. It has been seen
that transformational leaders are more innovative than
transactional and laisse-faire leaders.
6. 6
Theories of leadership
I. Traditional Theory
Traditional theory is a theory based on different traits of a human
beings. It assumes that leaders are born and not made. According to
this theory, leadership behavior is the sum total of all traits that a
leader possess.
Thus this theory gives the profile of a successful and complete leader.
According to this theory, there are five human traits. They are −
Physical trait − it includes energy, activity, appearance, and
height.
Ability trait − it includes judgement, knowledge, and fluency in
speech.
Personal trait − it includes self-confidence, creativity, and
enthusiasm.
Work trait − it includes organization and achievement.
Social trait − it includes interpersonal skill, cooperativeness,
popularity and prestige.
Drawbacks
7. 7
Following are the major drawbacks of this theory −
Traits are not arranged according to their importance.
There is no quantitative tool to judge the human traits.
This trait can’t be used universally.
This trait can be achieved and developed.
Situational factors are avoided.
II. Behavioral Theory
This theory explains the effectiveness of leadership. According to
this theory, leadership has two qualities i.e., initiating structure and
consideration. These qualities are tested with higher and lower levels
with proper intersection of each other.
Initiating Structure
It is the level up to which a leader is task oriented and directs the
employee towards achieving a goal. In this case, the leader gives
instruction, makes plan and schedules work activities.
Consideration
It is the level up to which a leader is concerned with the sub-
ordinates, ideas and feelings. Considerate leaders are friendly, they
8. 8
show concern for sub-ordinates’ well-being and satisfaction. This type
of leadership is achieved by performance and is found to be effective.
But it is not the best way as situational factors are not taken into
consideration.
III. Contingency Theory
According to this theory, propounded by Paul Hersey and Ken
Blanchard, believes the effectiveness of a leader is dependent on the
action or readiness of his followers. By readiness we mean the extent
to which the followers are able and willing to achieve the goal.
This theory is explained on the basis of four cases.
Case 1 − in case one, we have high relationship behavior and low
task behavior. The leader motivates the followers and helps in
decision making. Not much productivity can be seen in this case
but the sense of togetherness is high.
Case 2 − in case two, we have high relationship behavior as well
as high task behavior. In this combination, the leader explains
the decision and helps to build confidence of the employees. In
this case, productivity as well as loyalty towards the leader is
more.
9. 9
Case 3 − in case three, we have a combination of low relationship
behavior and low task behavior. Here we see that the leader
delegates the responsibility of decision making to the followers.
In this case, there is poor communication as well as poor
production.
Case 4 − Here we deal with a combination of low relationship
behavior and high task behavior. The leader gives specific
direction and supervises the performance. This theory is
effective only if the leaders change their style irrespective of
the readiness of the followers.