This document summarizes a presentation on agroecological approaches to breeding crops. It discusses breeding crops for mixtures and polycultures, including selecting varieties that complement each other in architecture, growth patterns, and resource use. Examples are provided of intercropping systems like maize-peanut and pigeon pea-groundnut mixtures that allow the crops to access different soil resources. The importance of understanding competition in monocultures and mutual benefits in mixtures is emphasized for successful selection.
1 of 29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
More Related Content
Agroecological approaches to breeding
1. Agroecological Approaches to Breeding
Professor Len Wade, lwade@csu.edu.au. Graham Centre, Charles Sturt
University, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650 Australia
International Symposium on Agroecology for Food Security and Nutrition
FAO Rome, 18-19 September 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
2. SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Content
Crop and system design for improved
agroecological fitness
Sustainable intensification, ecosystem services,
and food and nutrition security
Competition for resources and their allocation in
contrasting agronomic systems including
monoculture, mixtures, and with livestock
Implications for breeding targets, selection, proof of
concept
3. SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Monoculture
Define growing season – start, end, resources
Phenological pattern for performance and stability
Key traits needed for major biotic and abiotic stress
Effective phenotype with stable performance
Sample or create diversity, select, test, release
New crop – evaluate and release
Major crop – full breeding program
4. Agroecological Principles for Monoculture
Resources are finite, capture when available
Need to understand system dynamics for
replenishment of available resources
Issue of competition and phenotype expression
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
e.g. wheat
Early generation spaced plants
vs. advanced generation sward
Recognise need for a different plant type for
success in each system
5. a)
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Leaf Area (cm2)
Yagan
Hamelin
Baudin
b)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Leaf area (cm2)
c)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
MS T1 T2 T3 T4
Leaf area (cm2)
Figure 4. Leaf areas for individual tillers of Yagan, Hamelin and Baudin grown in a controlled
environment room for 39 days at plant densities of: (a) 1 plant/pot, (b) 3 plants/pot and
(c) 5 plants/pot. (O’Callaghan 2006)
6. a)
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Dry Weight (g)
Yagan
Hamelin
Baudin
b)
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Dry Weight (g)
c)
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
MS T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 ST TT
Dry Weight (g)
Figure 6. Dry weights at 62 days of main stem, individual primary tillers, all secondary tiller and all tertiary
tillers, at: (a) 1 plant/pot, (b) 3 plants/pot and (c) 5 plants/pot. (O’Callaghan 2006)
7. Competition in Monoculture-based Crop
Aim to minimise inter-plant competition in like
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
sward
But for competitive advantage vs. weeds, may
select more competitive types, with high
projected LAI, e.g. Mahsuri rice
Leads to considerations of architectural design for
intercrops, e.g. maize-peanut
Consider concepts,
then look at examples
8. In a Mixture look for Mutual Advantage
Contrasting architecture or time sequence
Access resources from different zones
One partner with special attribute to help other
e.g. P acquisition, N fixation, deep roots
Commensualism and helping each other
Include perennial crops in diverse systems
e.g. Wade 2014 in FAO Workshop
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
9. Mixtures with Multiple Roles
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Intercrop or relay cropping:
harvest one for grain then the other later,
or graze now then allow to set grain later etc.
Role for trees, growth patterns offset, resources
drawn from different layers at different times
Grazing with provision of supplements e.g. hay,
silage, molasses/urea, salt, water
Pasture with regular livestock grazing
10. Perennial Grass and Annual Forage Legume
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
A B
A. A mixed forage pasture sward containing a perennial grass (Phalaris
aquatica) and self-regenerating annual legume species (Trifolium
subterraneum, T. michelianum and T. glanduliferum)
B. Gland clover (T. glandiferum); A self-regenerating annual forage legume
released commercially in Australia for its superior insect pest resistance
Hayes et al 2014
11. SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
(a) Permanent perennial grain crop
polyculture
(b) Perennial cereal- annual legume mixture
(c) Relay or companion cropping into
perennial cereal
Depictions of alternative
farming systems involving
permanent perennial cereals
Bell 2014
12. SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Year 1 -3 – Perennial cereal phase
Grain legume Cereal or non-legume
crop
Legume pasture
Rebuilding soil N and water reserves
Creating dry soil buffer
Years 4-6 – Annual crop phase
Wet soil
Dry soil
(d) Phase perennial crop-annual crop/pasture rotation
Bell 2014
13. Pigeon peas provide intercropping opportunities for farmers. Because of their
slow growth rates in the first year, they do not compete aggressively with
faster growing legumes such as groundnuts. As they regrow in the second
season, they can compete with more aggressive crops such as maize.
Snapp 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
14. Intercropping of pigeon pea and groundnut
Taller, slower growing pigeon peas complement lower- and faster-growing
groundnuts, which are ready for harvest several weeks before pigeon peas
mature
Glover 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
15. Shrubby pigeon pea intercrops (SP-Intercrop) and shrubby pigeon pea rotations
(SP-Rotation) decrease fertiliser requirements; improve the value cost ratio
(VCR), fertiliser use efficiency, and protein yields; increase carbon and nitrogen
assimilation and phosphorus availability; and provide greater cover than
monoculture maize Snapp 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Resource Efficiency
16. Ecological tradeoff for seven different crop rotations as cropped land in
Watonwan County, Minnesota, is changed from 100% prairie to 100% of
each of the different crop rotations
corn-pennycress
-wheat
Curves indicate the tradeoff between relative sediment loss and relative
economic value of each rotation (Runck et al 2014)
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Ecological consequences
soy-wheat
bare
soil
corn or corn-soy
17. Ecosystem services under 3 land-use regimes
Reganold 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Transformative Systems
19. Faidherbia albida – Zea mays
Maize understory while tree is dormant
Maize in wet season, forage in dry season
Dixon & Garrity 2014
[Also mention Leakey 2014 – participatory agro-forestry]
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
20. Issues for Selection in Mixed Systems
Need to evaluate together in target systems
Must be managed in accord with intended use
Evaluate not individually, but by combined benefits
Successful phenotype for mixture may not be best
individually, e.g. like spaced vs. sward plants
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
21. Issues of Co-Evolution and Joint Selection
Species for grazing evolved with their grazer
Plants developed adaptations to allow them to be
grazed but still survive and reproduce, e.g.
growing points sheltered in grasses
Animals adapted mouthparts, digestive flora in gut,
tolerance to certain plant chemicals, foraging
ability
Co-evolution in natural environments as a model
for selection in managed environments
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
22. Improvement in a Co-Evolutionary Context
Seek plants with improved capture of resources,
better survival and growth under stress and
grazing
Animals with greater growth efficiency, better
foragers, able to move, reproductive success
Management changes to assist – availability of
water, supplement for supporting young,
provision of shelter
Issue is system performance and resilience
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
23. Used examples from diverse systems
Annuals, perennials, mixtures, perennial crops
Need to develop and include perennial crops for
improved system performance and stability
Underused crops
Tef, Setaria and short duration grasses and grains
Sunflower esp. wild types; Lepidium (field cress)
Bambatse groundnut, other pulses, Trees
Select from germplasm vs. full breeding program
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
24. Conclusions
Challenges in mixtures, especially with livestock
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
– more complex
But similar principles apply
Understand characteristics of target population of
environments
Select for systems performance and stability
Care for agroecosystem fitness, system sustainability,
system intensification, ecosystems services, food
security and nutrition
Requires systems understanding – environmental health,
resource dynamics, resilience, sustainable
performance
25. SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Reference
Batello C, Wade LJ, Cox TS, Pogna N, Bozzini A,
Chopiany J 2014. Perennial Crops for Food
Security. Proceedings of the FAO Expert
Workshop, FAO, Rome, Italy 390pp
Acknowledgements
Many colleagues for useful discussions
26. Mean overlap of flowering periods of native legumes at
Seton, MB, for 2010-2013
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
Astragalus agrestis Douglas ex G. Don
Vicia americana Muhl. ex Willd.
Pediomelum esculentum
Dalea purpurea Vent.
Oxytropis splendens Douglas ex Hook.
Lathyrus ochroleucus Hook.
Dalea candida Michx. ex Willd.
120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Day of the Year
Cattani 2014
Polyculture example
27. Diagrammatic
representation of
the cycle of land
degradation and
associated
social
deprivation
Leakey 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
28. Diagrammatic
representation of
multifunctional
agriculture and its
goals
Leakey 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES
29. Diagrammatic
representation
of how the
three steps to
close the yield
gap impact on
food security,
poverty and
livelihoods
(sustainable
intensification)
1 = Improved
fallows (N fix)
2 = Particip
domestication
3 = Value add
and process
Leakey 2014
SCHOOL OF AGRICULTURAL & WINE SCIENCES