Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Literature Reviews
   Professor Kathleen Keating
       kkeating@unm.edu
   Outline for this “Literature Review” session
       Define a Literature Review
       Identify resources to search for Literature Reviews
       How to begin the process of collecting material for the development
        of a Literature Review
What is a Literature Review?

Definition: The process of reading, analyzing,
  evaluating, and summarizing scholarly materials
  about a specific topic.

Use: The results of a literature review may be complied
  in a report or they may serve as a part of a research
  article, thesis, or grant proposal.
Literature Reviews
State-of-the-Art Assessment
                      (1) Written for
                       specialists
                      (2) Exhaustive
                       bibliography
Purpose of the literature review
   To show that you are a scholar
   To demonstrate how your research will contribute to the existing
    knowledge
   To show your skills in
       Information seeking: that you know and can find the pertinent materials in your field
       Critical appraisal: that you can evaluate the relevance/significance of your studies in
        your field
Grant Proposals
   If the grant requires a                The literature review section of a grant
                                            proposal is similar to that of an empirical
    background review of the                article, but it is often much shorter. Given
    literature and/or a discussion of       space limitations, it is important to only
                                            discuss literature that is directly relevant to
    theory, be sure you are very            your research topic. The literature review
    thorough. It is not uncommon            should demonstrate that this work has not been
                                            done before, or if previously conducted, had
    that one or more of the reviewers       serious flaws or employed a different
    on the grant will be subject            population (Herek, 1995). You should describe
    matter experts in that field and        how your work will overcome previous
                                            limitations and should capitalize on the
    will expect to see familiar and         strengths of past research. Be sure to critically
    relative works cited in the             evaluate the literature and include literature
                                            that tells more than one side of the story.
    literature review.                      Describe the corresponding literature in the
   http://www.esri.com/grants/abou         same order that you listed your research
                                            questions and hypotheses.
    t/grant_application_writing.html       http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer
                                            /getArticle.cfm?id=1415
Vocabulary
   “Literature Reviews”      Look at Advanced
   “Literature Review*”       Search Options in
   “Literature Survey”        databases:
   “Systematic Review”           Limit
   Review                        Add to a search box
   Meta Analysis
Resources to Find Literature Reviews
          Scholarly Literature
          Annual Reviews of…(Journals)
          Congressional Hearings
          Congressional Committee Prints
          Congressional Research Service
           reports
          Doctoral dissertations
          Masters Theses
          Online catalogs, LIBROS, WorldCat
Since 1932, Annual Reviews has offered
    Annual Reviews
                                                 
                                                    comprehensive, timely collections of
                                                     critical reviews written by leading
    Electronic Journal                               scientists. Annual Reviews volumes are
                                                     published each year for 40 focused
    & Archives                                       disciplines within the Biomedical, Life,
   Pathway: http://elibarary.unm.edu, select        Physical, and Social Sciences, including
    Databases tab, from the alphabetical list,       Economics
    select A for Annual Reviews. You will
    be prompted to supply your UNM NetID
    and password.
Scholarly Literature
   Web of Science: Access to the                   PsycINFO (Methodology:
    worlds leading scholarly                         Literature Review – Systematic Review)
    literature in the sciences, social              ERIC, Education
    sciences, arts, humanities.
    (Literature reviews or literature surveys)       Resources Information
         Science Citation Index                     Center (Thesaurus Descriptor)
          Social Sciences Citation Index
    
                                                    Library, Information
         Arts & Humanities Citation Index
                                                     Science & Technology
                                                     Abstracts
                                                    Library and Information
                                                     Science Abstracts (LISA)
                                                     Document type: Journal Article,
                                                     Literature Review
                                                    Google Scholar
U.S. Congress

   Congressional Hearings,
    Prints, and Congressional
    Research Service
   Database: ProQuest
    Congressional
Doctoral Dissertations/Masters Theses
   Database: Digital Dissertations
   LoboVault
   Google
   Google Scholar
Medicine/Health Care
         Literature Review Vocabulary
   Databases:            Literature Reviews
       PubMed                Systematic Review
       Cochrane              Meta-analysis
       DynaMed               Review
Steps to writing a literature review

   Clarify
       How many sources? What types of sources? Will you summarize,
        synthesize, or critique your sources? Will you evaluate your sources?
   Find models
   Narrow your topic
   Current sources
   Pathway: http://elibrary.unm.edu Databases Tab,
   Research Guides http://libguides.unm.edu/
   Consult experts
Strategies for writing
   Find a focus & construct a working thesis
    statement
   Consider organization
       Chronological, publication, trend
       Thematic
       Methodological
       Methods and/or Standards
Begin Composing

   Use evidence
   Be selective
   Use quotes sparingly
   Summarize and synthesize
   Keep your own voice
   Use caution when paraphrasing
   Revise, revise, revise
Other resources
   Grant Proposal Writing: Elements for Success
    http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/pdf/efop/efo31072.pdf (See Literature Review)
   Lit Review synthesis matrix http://coe.unm.edu/uploads/docs/writing-studio/Lit
    %20review%20synthesis%20matrix.pdf
   LIBROS – Online Catalog http://libros.unm.edu/search~S7 Search for “Literature
    Reviews” in Keyword search
Questions?

More Related Content

Literature review

  • 1. Literature Reviews Professor Kathleen Keating kkeating@unm.edu
  • 2. Outline for this “Literature Review” session  Define a Literature Review  Identify resources to search for Literature Reviews  How to begin the process of collecting material for the development of a Literature Review
  • 3. What is a Literature Review? Definition: The process of reading, analyzing, evaluating, and summarizing scholarly materials about a specific topic. Use: The results of a literature review may be complied in a report or they may serve as a part of a research article, thesis, or grant proposal.
  • 4. Literature Reviews State-of-the-Art Assessment  (1) Written for specialists  (2) Exhaustive bibliography
  • 5. Purpose of the literature review  To show that you are a scholar  To demonstrate how your research will contribute to the existing knowledge  To show your skills in  Information seeking: that you know and can find the pertinent materials in your field  Critical appraisal: that you can evaluate the relevance/significance of your studies in your field
  • 6. Grant Proposals  If the grant requires a  The literature review section of a grant proposal is similar to that of an empirical background review of the article, but it is often much shorter. Given literature and/or a discussion of space limitations, it is important to only discuss literature that is directly relevant to theory, be sure you are very your research topic. The literature review thorough. It is not uncommon should demonstrate that this work has not been done before, or if previously conducted, had that one or more of the reviewers serious flaws or employed a different on the grant will be subject population (Herek, 1995). You should describe matter experts in that field and how your work will overcome previous limitations and should capitalize on the will expect to see familiar and strengths of past research. Be sure to critically relative works cited in the evaluate the literature and include literature that tells more than one side of the story. literature review. Describe the corresponding literature in the  http://www.esri.com/grants/abou same order that you listed your research questions and hypotheses. t/grant_application_writing.html  http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer /getArticle.cfm?id=1415
  • 7. Vocabulary  “Literature Reviews”  Look at Advanced  “Literature Review*” Search Options in  “Literature Survey” databases:  “Systematic Review”  Limit  Review  Add to a search box  Meta Analysis
  • 8. Resources to Find Literature Reviews  Scholarly Literature  Annual Reviews of…(Journals)  Congressional Hearings  Congressional Committee Prints  Congressional Research Service reports  Doctoral dissertations  Masters Theses  Online catalogs, LIBROS, WorldCat
  • 9. Since 1932, Annual Reviews has offered Annual Reviews   comprehensive, timely collections of critical reviews written by leading Electronic Journal scientists. Annual Reviews volumes are published each year for 40 focused & Archives disciplines within the Biomedical, Life,  Pathway: http://elibarary.unm.edu, select Physical, and Social Sciences, including Databases tab, from the alphabetical list, Economics select A for Annual Reviews. You will be prompted to supply your UNM NetID and password.
  • 10. Scholarly Literature  Web of Science: Access to the  PsycINFO (Methodology: worlds leading scholarly Literature Review – Systematic Review) literature in the sciences, social  ERIC, Education sciences, arts, humanities. (Literature reviews or literature surveys) Resources Information  Science Citation Index Center (Thesaurus Descriptor) Social Sciences Citation Index   Library, Information  Arts & Humanities Citation Index Science & Technology Abstracts  Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Document type: Journal Article, Literature Review  Google Scholar
  • 11. U.S. Congress  Congressional Hearings, Prints, and Congressional Research Service  Database: ProQuest Congressional
  • 12. Doctoral Dissertations/Masters Theses  Database: Digital Dissertations  LoboVault  Google  Google Scholar
  • 13. Medicine/Health Care Literature Review Vocabulary  Databases:  Literature Reviews  PubMed  Systematic Review  Cochrane  Meta-analysis  DynaMed  Review
  • 14. Steps to writing a literature review  Clarify  How many sources? What types of sources? Will you summarize, synthesize, or critique your sources? Will you evaluate your sources?  Find models  Narrow your topic  Current sources  Pathway: http://elibrary.unm.edu Databases Tab,  Research Guides http://libguides.unm.edu/  Consult experts
  • 15. Strategies for writing  Find a focus & construct a working thesis statement  Consider organization  Chronological, publication, trend  Thematic  Methodological  Methods and/or Standards
  • 16. Begin Composing  Use evidence  Be selective  Use quotes sparingly  Summarize and synthesize  Keep your own voice  Use caution when paraphrasing  Revise, revise, revise
  • 17. Other resources  Grant Proposal Writing: Elements for Success http://www.usfa.dhs.gov/pdf/efop/efo31072.pdf (See Literature Review)  Lit Review synthesis matrix http://coe.unm.edu/uploads/docs/writing-studio/Lit %20review%20synthesis%20matrix.pdf  LIBROS – Online Catalog http://libros.unm.edu/search~S7 Search for “Literature Reviews” in Keyword search

Editor's Notes

  1. http://elibary.unm.edu
  2. Grant reviewers will be experts in your field Given the space limitations, only discuss what is relevant to the research topic. Critically evaluate the literature
  3. Annual Reviews: log in as kjkeating Child* and Violence **change Abstract to All Fields Or Dark Matter Demonstrate: Relevance, Most recent,
  4. In web of science – go to advanced search, Type TS=“Child Care” and then select English and Review for literature reviews. PsycINFO – go to advanced, Select English, Under Methodology select Lit review –systematic review. Use “child abuse” ERIC – go to “search the Thesaurus” then type Literature Reviews, add to search, “child abuse” and reading LISTA – Topic Interoperability, “literature reviews” LISA – Advanced Search, Clear Document type: select Journal Article, Literature Review, Select Language, topic : computer science Google Scholar – Interoperability and “Literature review*”
  5. Digital Dissertations = go to Advanced Search, “child abuse” and “literature review*” , show the first 24 pages, the limit to UNM only. LOBOVault = since 2008 all dissertations and masters thesis are put in Open Access, LOBOvault. Go to communties. Temporal dynamics and spatial analysis of competing dengue 2 virus strains in the Americas
  6. Chronological: If your review follows the chronological method, you can write about the information according to when they were published. Another way is to organize the sources by trends. Thematic: Thematic reviews of literature are organized around a topic or issue, rather that the progression of time. Methodological approach differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of the researcher or writer.