Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Mikkeli20.9.2012

•
•
Sirpa Kurppa
Sirpa Kurppa

The document discusses the European Union's strategy for a sustainable bioeconomy. It defines bioeconomy as an economy using biological resources and waste as inputs for food, industrial, and energy production. The strategy has three pillars: 1) investment in bioeconomy research, innovation, and skills; 2) developing bioeconomy markets and competitiveness through sustainable production and converting waste; and 3) reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement. Examples of research areas include developing bioplastics from forest resources and alternative fish feeds. The strategy aims to create jobs and green growth through more efficient resource use, such as converting food waste to bioenergy.

Related slideshows

110622 presentatie ukraineshort
110622 presentatie ukraineshort110622 presentatie ukraineshort
110622 presentatie ukraineshort
 
'Developing the Biobased Economy' presentation given at the 25th Anniversary ...
'Developing the Biobased Economy' presentation given at the 25th Anniversary ...'Developing the Biobased Economy' presentation given at the 25th Anniversary ...
'Developing the Biobased Economy' presentation given at the 25th Anniversary ...
 
Bic bbi sira_web
Bic bbi sira_webBic bbi sira_web
Bic bbi sira_web
 
1 of 28
19.9.2012 1 Sirpa Kurppa, MTT Agrifood Research Finland Sustainable Bioeconomy FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
19.9.2012 2 What does sustainable bioeconomy mean? • ‘The term "Bioeconomy" means an economy using biological resources from the land and sea, as well as waste, as inputs to food and feed, industrial and energy production. It also covers the use of bio-based processes for sustainable industries.’ Brussels, 13 February 2012 – The European Commission • Strategy for a sustainable bio-economy is to ensure smart green growth in Europe. FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
19.9.2012 3 The bio-economy in the European Union Sector Annual turnover (billion €) Employment (thousands) Data source Food 965 4400 CIAA Agriculture 381 12000 COPA-COGECA, Eurostat Paper/Pulp 375 1800 CEPI Forestry/Wood ind. 269 3000 CEI-BOIS Fisheries and Aquaculture 32 500 EC*** Bio-based industries Bio-chemicals and plastics 50 (estimation*) 150 (estimation*) USDA, Arthur D Little, Festel, McKinsey, CEFIC Enzymes 0.8 (estimation*) 5 (estimation*) Amfep, Novozymes, Danisco/Genencor, DSM Biofuels 6** 150 EBB, eBio Total 2078 22005 *Estimation for Europe for 2009; **Estimation based on a production of 2.2 million tonnes bio-ethanol and 7.7 million tonnes of biodiesel at average market price in Europe; ***EC, Facts and figures on the CFP, Basic Statistics Data, ISSN 1830-9119, 2010 Edition
The Strategy has three main pillars: 1) Investment in research, innovation and skills for the bio-economy. This should include EU funding, national funding, private investment and enhancing synergies with other policy initiatives. 2) Development of markets and competitiveness in bio-economy sectors by a sustainable intensification of primary production, conversion of waste streams into value-added products, as well as mutual learning mechanisms for improved production and resource efficiency. As an example, food waste costs the European taxpayer between €55 and €90 per tonne to dispose of, and produces 170 million tonnes of CO2. This waste could be transformed into bio-energy or other bio-based products, creating jobs and growth. 3) Reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement, through the creation of a Bioeconomy Panel, a Bioeconomy Observatory and regular Stakeholder Conferences; 19.9.2012 4 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
Research and innovation in the bio- economy – examples • 1) FORBIOPLAST - Drawing on forest resources for sustainable manufacturing - to reduce its dependence on petro-chemicals. - wood- derived fibres and forestry by-products could replace petro-chemicals in a wide array of products • 2) AQUAMAX (FP7) – creating a vegetarian diet for fish -alternative for fish meal and fish oil • 3) Future biodegradable materials for a better quality of life (ERC)- eco- friendly plastic bags - creating of materials that mimic nature’s structural organization - biodegrade • 4) Paving the way to greener products and services (JRC). Life cycle assessment is a key to substantial improvement of the environmental performance of goods and services - it quantifies the impacts of products from the extraction of natural resources to recycling or waste disposal. 19.9.2012 5
19.9.2012 6
Unit process thinking 19.9.2012 7
19.9.2012 8 Douple functional processes etc soya, rape seed, cow…
From gradle to grave 19.9.2012 9 Be careful with the system boundaries with complex systems as bioe-conomy consists and of which organic production is a special case!
Land use Input industry Feed production Feed industry Milk farm Dairy factory Trade Consumers Energy Toxic waste Solid waste Liquid waste and nutrients Landscape Stakeholders administrative Local people Public media NGOs Zitizens Product owners Transport How ecological footprint is being formed. Graph: Pasi Voutilainen Water Surface water 19.9.2012 10
19.9.2012 11
19.9.2012 12 LCA approach is always goal oriented! It is good for improvment! It is very challenging in use to compare two different systems
19.9.2012 13 What does sustainable bioeconomy mean? • ‘The term "Bioeconomy" means an economy using biological resources from the land and sea, as well as waste, as inputs to food and feed, industrial and energy production. It also covers the use of bio-based processes for sustainable industries.’ Brussels, 13 February 2012 – The European Commission • Strategy for a sustainable bio-economy is to ensure smart green growth in Europe. FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
smart green growth • High-tech knowledge of unit processes • Novel combination of unit processes into sub-systems • Complex and case specific systems • Co-creation • Service oriented - prosumerism • Online assessment, which is goal and value oriented • Facilitated by • cloud technology 19.9.2012 14 http://cloud-computation.blogspot.fi/search/label/Cloud%20Computing
The Strategy has three main pillars: 1) Investment in research, innovation and skills for the bio-economy. This should include EU funding, national funding, private investment and enhancing synergies with other policy initiatives. 2) Development of markets and competitiveness in bio-economy sectors by a sustainable intensification of primary production, conversion of waste streams into value-added products, as well as mutual learning mechanisms for improved production and resource efficiency. As an example, food waste costs the European taxpayer between €55 and €90 per tonne to dispose of, and produces 170 million tonnes of CO2. This waste could be transformed into bio-energy or other bio-based products, creating jobs and growth. 3) Reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement, through the creation of a Bioeconomy Panel, a Bioeconomy Observatory and regular Stakeholder Conferences; 19.9.2012 15 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
New markets can be developed by: • Developing standards and standardised sustainability assessment methodologies for bio-based products and food production systems and supporting demonstration and scale-up activities; • Facilitating green procurement for bio-based products by developing specific labels, an initial European product information list and specific training for public procurers; • Putting in place incentives and mutual learning mechanisms for improved resource efficiency; • Starting negotiations for establishing research and innovation Public Private Partnerships for bio-based industries at European level. 19.9.2012 16 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
The Strategy has three main pillars: 1) Investment in research, innovation and skills for the bio-economy. This should include EU funding, national funding, private investment and enhancing synergies with other policy initiatives. 2) Development of markets and competitiveness in bio-economy sectors by a sustainable intensification of primary production, conversion of waste streams into value-added products, as well as mutual learning mechanisms for improved production and resource efficiency. As an example, food waste costs the European taxpayer between €55 and €90 per tonne to dispose of, and produces 170 million tonnes of CO2. This waste could be transformed into bio-energy or other bio-based products, creating jobs and growth. 3) Reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement, through the creation of a Bioeconomy Panel, a Bioeconomy Observatory and regular Stakeholder Conferences; 19.9.2012 17 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
Steps to achieve greater coherence include: • Creating a Bioeconomy Panel built on already existing resources and structures, that will involve relevant European Commission services, Member States and stakeholders to ensure synergies and coherence between policies, initiatives and economic sectors. Encourage the creation of similar panels at Member State and regional level. • A Bioeconomy Observatory at EU level will be established to assess the progress and impact of the bio-economy in Europe and to inform further policy making. The Observatory will build on existing systems at regional, national and supra-national level and develop common indicators for measuring bio-economy activity. • Support the development of regional and national bio-economy strategies by providing a mapping of existing research and innovation activities, competence centres and infrastructures in the EU (by 2015). • Foster participation of researchers, end-users, policy-makers and civil society in an open and informed dialogue throughout the research and innovation process of the bio-economy. 19.9.2012 18FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
19.9.2012 19
19.9.2012 20
19.9.2012 21 Compare to local food!
In Finland: Potential Challenges and Benefits of Bioeconomy • Lack of standardization • Inward-oriented business models • Challenges related to authorities • Solid requirements on materials used • Limitations on usage of biofuel production by-products (feed, fertilization) • Need for country level quotas for biofuels • Tax breaks and other incentives • Life-cycle thinking in decision making • Legislation changes and related uncertainty • Missing permits and regulation e.g. for new types of production in the scope of the bio-economy • Challenges related to knowledge and information flows 19.9.2012 22
• Related to investments • Benefit and risk sharing • Industry restructuring and core businesses’ • Commitment of other actors involved • Education and awareness • Locality and small scale 19.9.2012 23 In Finland: Potential Challenges and Benefits of Bioeconomy cont.
Programme to promote sustainable consumption and production - More from Less – Wisely, was published in May 2012. • For the food sector, the expert group proposes the introduction of a tracking system, to verify that responsible practices are being applied. • This would provide information on the origin of food and its production chain. • Food that is healthy, appetising and environmentally friendly can be combined, by developing a ‘Healthy and environmentally friendly plate model’. 19.9.2012 24
Recommendations for nutrition Recommendations for Food choices Work welfare ‘Healthy and environmentally friendly plate model’.
19.9.2012 26 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Normalised global warming impacts of a Finn (Eco-Benchmark) Broad bean patty with mashed potatoes (veget.) home Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (vegetarian), home Beetroot patty with barley, home Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (ovo-lactoveget.) home Vegetable casserole, home Minced meat-macaroni casserole, ready-to-eat Rainbow trout casserole, ready-to-eat Chicken-pasta casserole, ready-to-eat Ham casserole, ready-to-eat Vegetable casserole, ready-to-eat Barley porridge with berry fool, ready-to-eat Minced chicken meat-macaroni casserole, home Frankfurter and mashed potatoes, home Barley porridge with berry fool, home Rainbow trout casserole, home Chicken sauce with wholemeal pasta, home Chicken sauce with wholemeal rice, home Chicken casserole, home Chicken in cream sauce with rice, ready-to-eat Ham casserole, home Minced meat-macaroni casserole, home Global warming impact of the case lunch plates in relation to normalised daily global warming impact of an average Finn 27, 4 kg CO2 ekv + I kgI kg I kg + % Climate change impact per a food portion
19.9.2012 27 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Normalised eutrification impacts of a Finn (Eco-Benchmark) Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (vegetarian) home Broad bean patty with mashed potatoes, home Beetroot patty with barley, home Chicken-pasta casserole, ready-to-eat Vegetable casserole, home Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (ovo-lactoveget.) home Vegetable casserole, ready-to-eat Minced meat-macaroni casserole, ready-to-eat Minced chicken meat-macaroni casserole, home Ham casserole, ready-to-eat Frankfurter and mashed potatoes, home Barley porridge with berry fool, ready-to-eat Chicken sauce with wholemeal pasta, home Chicken in cream sauce with rice, ready-to-eat Chicken sauce with wholemeal rice, home Chicken casserole, home Barley porridge with berry fool, home Ham casserole, home Rainbow trout casserole, ready-to-eat Minced meat-macaroni casserole , home Rainbow trout casserole, home Eutrophication impact of the case lunch plates in relation to normalised daily eutrophication impact of an average Finn %The lunch plates comprised a main dish, salad, bread and a drink 9,6 g PO4 ekv I gI g I g+ + Eutrophication impact per a food portion, specific for Nordic conditions and in terms of th Baltic Sea
19.9.2012 28 Sincere thanks for your interest!

More Related Content

Mikkeli20.9.2012

  • 1. 19.9.2012 1 Sirpa Kurppa, MTT Agrifood Research Finland Sustainable Bioeconomy FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 2. 19.9.2012 2 What does sustainable bioeconomy mean? • ‘The term "Bioeconomy" means an economy using biological resources from the land and sea, as well as waste, as inputs to food and feed, industrial and energy production. It also covers the use of bio-based processes for sustainable industries.’ Brussels, 13 February 2012 – The European Commission • Strategy for a sustainable bio-economy is to ensure smart green growth in Europe. FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 3. 19.9.2012 3 The bio-economy in the European Union Sector Annual turnover (billion €) Employment (thousands) Data source Food 965 4400 CIAA Agriculture 381 12000 COPA-COGECA, Eurostat Paper/Pulp 375 1800 CEPI Forestry/Wood ind. 269 3000 CEI-BOIS Fisheries and Aquaculture 32 500 EC*** Bio-based industries Bio-chemicals and plastics 50 (estimation*) 150 (estimation*) USDA, Arthur D Little, Festel, McKinsey, CEFIC Enzymes 0.8 (estimation*) 5 (estimation*) Amfep, Novozymes, Danisco/Genencor, DSM Biofuels 6** 150 EBB, eBio Total 2078 22005 *Estimation for Europe for 2009; **Estimation based on a production of 2.2 million tonnes bio-ethanol and 7.7 million tonnes of biodiesel at average market price in Europe; ***EC, Facts and figures on the CFP, Basic Statistics Data, ISSN 1830-9119, 2010 Edition
  • 4. The Strategy has three main pillars: 1) Investment in research, innovation and skills for the bio-economy. This should include EU funding, national funding, private investment and enhancing synergies with other policy initiatives. 2) Development of markets and competitiveness in bio-economy sectors by a sustainable intensification of primary production, conversion of waste streams into value-added products, as well as mutual learning mechanisms for improved production and resource efficiency. As an example, food waste costs the European taxpayer between €55 and €90 per tonne to dispose of, and produces 170 million tonnes of CO2. This waste could be transformed into bio-energy or other bio-based products, creating jobs and growth. 3) Reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement, through the creation of a Bioeconomy Panel, a Bioeconomy Observatory and regular Stakeholder Conferences; 19.9.2012 4 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 5. Research and innovation in the bio- economy – examples • 1) FORBIOPLAST - Drawing on forest resources for sustainable manufacturing - to reduce its dependence on petro-chemicals. - wood- derived fibres and forestry by-products could replace petro-chemicals in a wide array of products • 2) AQUAMAX (FP7) – creating a vegetarian diet for fish -alternative for fish meal and fish oil • 3) Future biodegradable materials for a better quality of life (ERC)- eco- friendly plastic bags - creating of materials that mimic nature’s structural organization - biodegrade • 4) Paving the way to greener products and services (JRC). Life cycle assessment is a key to substantial improvement of the environmental performance of goods and services - it quantifies the impacts of products from the extraction of natural resources to recycling or waste disposal. 19.9.2012 5
  • 8. 19.9.2012 8 Douple functional processes etc soya, rape seed, cow…
  • 9. From gradle to grave 19.9.2012 9 Be careful with the system boundaries with complex systems as bioe-conomy consists and of which organic production is a special case!
  • 10. Land use Input industry Feed production Feed industry Milk farm Dairy factory Trade Consumers Energy Toxic waste Solid waste Liquid waste and nutrients Landscape Stakeholders administrative Local people Public media NGOs Zitizens Product owners Transport How ecological footprint is being formed. Graph: Pasi Voutilainen Water Surface water 19.9.2012 10
  • 12. 19.9.2012 12 LCA approach is always goal oriented! It is good for improvment! It is very challenging in use to compare two different systems
  • 13. 19.9.2012 13 What does sustainable bioeconomy mean? • ‘The term "Bioeconomy" means an economy using biological resources from the land and sea, as well as waste, as inputs to food and feed, industrial and energy production. It also covers the use of bio-based processes for sustainable industries.’ Brussels, 13 February 2012 – The European Commission • Strategy for a sustainable bio-economy is to ensure smart green growth in Europe. FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 14. smart green growth • High-tech knowledge of unit processes • Novel combination of unit processes into sub-systems • Complex and case specific systems • Co-creation • Service oriented - prosumerism • Online assessment, which is goal and value oriented • Facilitated by • cloud technology 19.9.2012 14 http://cloud-computation.blogspot.fi/search/label/Cloud%20Computing
  • 15. The Strategy has three main pillars: 1) Investment in research, innovation and skills for the bio-economy. This should include EU funding, national funding, private investment and enhancing synergies with other policy initiatives. 2) Development of markets and competitiveness in bio-economy sectors by a sustainable intensification of primary production, conversion of waste streams into value-added products, as well as mutual learning mechanisms for improved production and resource efficiency. As an example, food waste costs the European taxpayer between €55 and €90 per tonne to dispose of, and produces 170 million tonnes of CO2. This waste could be transformed into bio-energy or other bio-based products, creating jobs and growth. 3) Reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement, through the creation of a Bioeconomy Panel, a Bioeconomy Observatory and regular Stakeholder Conferences; 19.9.2012 15 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 16. New markets can be developed by: • Developing standards and standardised sustainability assessment methodologies for bio-based products and food production systems and supporting demonstration and scale-up activities; • Facilitating green procurement for bio-based products by developing specific labels, an initial European product information list and specific training for public procurers; • Putting in place incentives and mutual learning mechanisms for improved resource efficiency; • Starting negotiations for establishing research and innovation Public Private Partnerships for bio-based industries at European level. 19.9.2012 16 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 17. The Strategy has three main pillars: 1) Investment in research, innovation and skills for the bio-economy. This should include EU funding, national funding, private investment and enhancing synergies with other policy initiatives. 2) Development of markets and competitiveness in bio-economy sectors by a sustainable intensification of primary production, conversion of waste streams into value-added products, as well as mutual learning mechanisms for improved production and resource efficiency. As an example, food waste costs the European taxpayer between €55 and €90 per tonne to dispose of, and produces 170 million tonnes of CO2. This waste could be transformed into bio-energy or other bio-based products, creating jobs and growth. 3) Reinforced policy coordination and stakeholder engagement, through the creation of a Bioeconomy Panel, a Bioeconomy Observatory and regular Stakeholder Conferences; 19.9.2012 17 FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 18. Steps to achieve greater coherence include: • Creating a Bioeconomy Panel built on already existing resources and structures, that will involve relevant European Commission services, Member States and stakeholders to ensure synergies and coherence between policies, initiatives and economic sectors. Encourage the creation of similar panels at Member State and regional level. • A Bioeconomy Observatory at EU level will be established to assess the progress and impact of the bio-economy in Europe and to inform further policy making. The Observatory will build on existing systems at regional, national and supra-national level and develop common indicators for measuring bio-economy activity. • Support the development of regional and national bio-economy strategies by providing a mapping of existing research and innovation activities, competence centres and infrastructures in the EU (by 2015). • Foster participation of researchers, end-users, policy-makers and civil society in an open and informed dialogue throughout the research and innovation process of the bio-economy. 19.9.2012 18FUTURE CHALLENGES IN PROFESSIONAL KITCHENS III International Seminar 19. – 20.9.2012, Mikkeli, Finland
  • 21. 19.9.2012 21 Compare to local food!
  • 22. In Finland: Potential Challenges and Benefits of Bioeconomy • Lack of standardization • Inward-oriented business models • Challenges related to authorities • Solid requirements on materials used • Limitations on usage of biofuel production by-products (feed, fertilization) • Need for country level quotas for biofuels • Tax breaks and other incentives • Life-cycle thinking in decision making • Legislation changes and related uncertainty • Missing permits and regulation e.g. for new types of production in the scope of the bio-economy • Challenges related to knowledge and information flows 19.9.2012 22
  • 23. • Related to investments • Benefit and risk sharing • Industry restructuring and core businesses’ • Commitment of other actors involved • Education and awareness • Locality and small scale 19.9.2012 23 In Finland: Potential Challenges and Benefits of Bioeconomy cont.
  • 24. Programme to promote sustainable consumption and production - More from Less – Wisely, was published in May 2012. • For the food sector, the expert group proposes the introduction of a tracking system, to verify that responsible practices are being applied. • This would provide information on the origin of food and its production chain. • Food that is healthy, appetising and environmentally friendly can be combined, by developing a ‘Healthy and environmentally friendly plate model’. 19.9.2012 24
  • 25. Recommendations for nutrition Recommendations for Food choices Work welfare ‘Healthy and environmentally friendly plate model’.
  • 26. 19.9.2012 26 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Normalised global warming impacts of a Finn (Eco-Benchmark) Broad bean patty with mashed potatoes (veget.) home Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (vegetarian), home Beetroot patty with barley, home Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (ovo-lactoveget.) home Vegetable casserole, home Minced meat-macaroni casserole, ready-to-eat Rainbow trout casserole, ready-to-eat Chicken-pasta casserole, ready-to-eat Ham casserole, ready-to-eat Vegetable casserole, ready-to-eat Barley porridge with berry fool, ready-to-eat Minced chicken meat-macaroni casserole, home Frankfurter and mashed potatoes, home Barley porridge with berry fool, home Rainbow trout casserole, home Chicken sauce with wholemeal pasta, home Chicken sauce with wholemeal rice, home Chicken casserole, home Chicken in cream sauce with rice, ready-to-eat Ham casserole, home Minced meat-macaroni casserole, home Global warming impact of the case lunch plates in relation to normalised daily global warming impact of an average Finn 27, 4 kg CO2 ekv + I kgI kg I kg + % Climate change impact per a food portion
  • 27. 19.9.2012 27 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Normalised eutrification impacts of a Finn (Eco-Benchmark) Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (vegetarian) home Broad bean patty with mashed potatoes, home Beetroot patty with barley, home Chicken-pasta casserole, ready-to-eat Vegetable casserole, home Soy bean patty with mashed potatoes (ovo-lactoveget.) home Vegetable casserole, ready-to-eat Minced meat-macaroni casserole, ready-to-eat Minced chicken meat-macaroni casserole, home Ham casserole, ready-to-eat Frankfurter and mashed potatoes, home Barley porridge with berry fool, ready-to-eat Chicken sauce with wholemeal pasta, home Chicken in cream sauce with rice, ready-to-eat Chicken sauce with wholemeal rice, home Chicken casserole, home Barley porridge with berry fool, home Ham casserole, home Rainbow trout casserole, ready-to-eat Minced meat-macaroni casserole , home Rainbow trout casserole, home Eutrophication impact of the case lunch plates in relation to normalised daily eutrophication impact of an average Finn %The lunch plates comprised a main dish, salad, bread and a drink 9,6 g PO4 ekv I gI g I g+ + Eutrophication impact per a food portion, specific for Nordic conditions and in terms of th Baltic Sea
  • 28. 19.9.2012 28 Sincere thanks for your interest!