Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Five-Year Review Report
      for Sites 1, 22, 26 and 28

    Restoration Advisory Board
Former Naval Air Station Moffett Field
          March 11, 2010

              Wilson Doctor
           Navy Project Manager
Five-Year Review Report



•   Previous Five-Year Review Reports
     – Site 1 Landfill 2002 and 2007
     – Site 22 Landfill 2008
     – Site 26 East Side Aquifers Treatment System (EATS) 2005
     – Site 28 West Side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS) 2005

•   2010 Five-Year Review Report Schedule
     – Draft report issued October 15, 2009
     – Agency comments received mid-December
     – Final February 12, 2010




                                     2
CERCLA Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28
 Former NAS Moffett Field, CA




               3
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28


Sites 1 and 22 Landfills
• Site 1 Record of Decision 1997
• Site 22 Record of Decision 2002

Landfill Remedies
• Construction and maintenance of landfill covers
• Groundwater and landfill gas monitoring
• Institutional controls (ICs)




                                      4
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28


Sites 1 and 22 Landfills

Findings
• Landfill remedies are currently protective
    – Landfill covers are functioning as intended
    – Groundwater contaminant concentrations stable
    – Landfill gas concentrations below threshold at landfill boundaries

Issue
• Need to complete institutional controls

Follow-up actions
• Incorporate institutional controls into NASA Ames land use planning
   documents

                                        5
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28


Site 26 East-side Aquifers Treatment System (EATS)
• Record of Decision 1996

Site 26 Remedy
• Groundwater extraction and treatment
• Groundwater monitoring
• Institutional controls




                                    6
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28

Site 26 East-side Aquifers Treatment System (EATS)
• EATS operational 1999 to 2003
• 2003 to present EATS turned off to evaluate alternative treatment
   methods

Findings
• Site 26 remedy is currently protective
    – Although EATS has remained off, the groundwater contaminant
      plumes are stable or decreasing
Issues
• Need to complete institutional controls
• EATS inefficient and ineffective treatment method

Follow-up Actions
• Incorporate institutional controls in NASA Ames land use planning
   documents
• Continue implementing pilot test       7
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28


Site 28 West-side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS)
• Record of Decision
    – In 1993, Navy adopted EPA 1989 MEW ROD

Site 28 Remedy
• Groundwater extraction and treatment
• Remediation of unsaturated soil
• Groundwater monitoring




                                    8
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28


Site 28 West-side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS)
• WATS operating 1998 to present
• Evaluating alternative treatment methods


Findings
•   Site 28 remedy is currently protective
     – WATS is functioning as intended
     – Groundwater contaminant plumes are stable or decreasing
     – No short-term health risks
     – NASA implementing mitigation measures for vapor intrusion




                                      9
Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28

Site 28 West-side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS)

Issues
• Potential actions needed to ensure long-term protectiveness from vapor
   intrusion
• The challenge of treating onsite and upgradient groundwater VOC sources

Follow-up Actions
• Incorporate ICs related to vapor intrusion in NASA Ames internal directive &
   Incorporate relevant measures of EPA vapor intrusion pathway study in
   NASA Ames construction permit process for buildings
• Continue to implement pilot test and to participate in a regional strategy to
   address groundwater contamination




                                       10
Questions




    11

More Related Content

Five-Year Review Report for Moffett Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28

  • 1. Five-Year Review Report for Sites 1, 22, 26 and 28 Restoration Advisory Board Former Naval Air Station Moffett Field March 11, 2010 Wilson Doctor Navy Project Manager
  • 2. Five-Year Review Report • Previous Five-Year Review Reports – Site 1 Landfill 2002 and 2007 – Site 22 Landfill 2008 – Site 26 East Side Aquifers Treatment System (EATS) 2005 – Site 28 West Side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS) 2005 • 2010 Five-Year Review Report Schedule – Draft report issued October 15, 2009 – Agency comments received mid-December – Final February 12, 2010 2
  • 3. CERCLA Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Former NAS Moffett Field, CA 3
  • 4. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Sites 1 and 22 Landfills • Site 1 Record of Decision 1997 • Site 22 Record of Decision 2002 Landfill Remedies • Construction and maintenance of landfill covers • Groundwater and landfill gas monitoring • Institutional controls (ICs) 4
  • 5. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Sites 1 and 22 Landfills Findings • Landfill remedies are currently protective – Landfill covers are functioning as intended – Groundwater contaminant concentrations stable – Landfill gas concentrations below threshold at landfill boundaries Issue • Need to complete institutional controls Follow-up actions • Incorporate institutional controls into NASA Ames land use planning documents 5
  • 6. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Site 26 East-side Aquifers Treatment System (EATS) • Record of Decision 1996 Site 26 Remedy • Groundwater extraction and treatment • Groundwater monitoring • Institutional controls 6
  • 7. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Site 26 East-side Aquifers Treatment System (EATS) • EATS operational 1999 to 2003 • 2003 to present EATS turned off to evaluate alternative treatment methods Findings • Site 26 remedy is currently protective – Although EATS has remained off, the groundwater contaminant plumes are stable or decreasing Issues • Need to complete institutional controls • EATS inefficient and ineffective treatment method Follow-up Actions • Incorporate institutional controls in NASA Ames land use planning documents • Continue implementing pilot test 7
  • 8. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Site 28 West-side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS) • Record of Decision – In 1993, Navy adopted EPA 1989 MEW ROD Site 28 Remedy • Groundwater extraction and treatment • Remediation of unsaturated soil • Groundwater monitoring 8
  • 9. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Site 28 West-side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS) • WATS operating 1998 to present • Evaluating alternative treatment methods Findings • Site 28 remedy is currently protective – WATS is functioning as intended – Groundwater contaminant plumes are stable or decreasing – No short-term health risks – NASA implementing mitigation measures for vapor intrusion 9
  • 10. Five-Year Review: Sites 1, 22, 26, and 28 Site 28 West-side Aquifers Treatment System (WATS) Issues • Potential actions needed to ensure long-term protectiveness from vapor intrusion • The challenge of treating onsite and upgradient groundwater VOC sources Follow-up Actions • Incorporate ICs related to vapor intrusion in NASA Ames internal directive & Incorporate relevant measures of EPA vapor intrusion pathway study in NASA Ames construction permit process for buildings • Continue to implement pilot test and to participate in a regional strategy to address groundwater contamination 10
  • 11. Questions 11