Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Node.js
Node.js
Shael Joon & Matt Simonis
Background
• Server Side JavaScript
• Developed by Ryan Dhal (2009)
• Currently owned by Joyent
• Based off Google’s V8 JavaScript Engine
  (which is written in C and C++)
• Open Source
It’s Asynchronous
•   Non-blocking due to system event notifications
•   Not having to deal with common multithreading
    problems such as deadlocks, resource sharing
    and etc. (See [6] for more details)
•   Scalability (930k[tested] to 1500k[claimed]
    connections) [4]
•   Most of the server and client side work can be
    done in JavaScript
Usage domain areas/users
Microsoft
Node gives Azure users the first end-to-end JavaScript experience for the
development of a whole new class of real-time applications.

eBay
Node’s evented I/O model freed us from worrying about locking and
concurrency issues that are common with multithreaded async I/O.

Linkedin
On the server side, our entire mobile software stack is completely built in Node.
One reason was scale. The second is Node showed us huge performance gains.

Yahoo
Node.js is the execution core of Manhattan. Allowing developers to build one
code base using one language – that is the nirvana for developers.

                                                                            http://nodejs.org/
Google Trends – “node.js”




                 http://www.google.com/trends/?q=node.js
Ample Resources
• Free e-Books
• Code Samples including 3rd party sources
• Modules usage guides/samples
• Benchmarking and comparisons to other
  technologies
• However, it is missing scholarly papers and
  research.
Modules
• Modules are plugins/add-ons/extensions for
  Node to help with development process.
• Often code examples are included
  alongside the module.
• Several categories of modules.
• Modules are plugins/add-ons/extensions for
  Node to help with development process.
3000+ modules in the areas below
• Web frameworks                • Templating                            • Parsers
      • Routers                 • CSS Engines                                  • JSON
      • Static file servers      • Content Management Systems                   • XML
      • Microframeworks         • Build and Deployment                         • Command Line Option
      • Frameworks              • Package Management Systems                     Parsers
      • Middleware              • Module Loader                                • Parser Generators
           • JSGI               • OpenSSL / Crypto / Hashing                   • Other Parsers
           • Connect            • SMTP                                  • Debugging / Console Utilities
           • Other middleware   • TCP / IP                              • Compression
      • Other                          • Multiple protocols             • Graphics
• Database                             • HTTP                           • Sound
      • MS SQL Server                  • FTP                            • Payment Gateways
      • PostgreSQL                     • E-mail                         • API clients
      • MySQL                          • XMPP                           • Control flow / Async goodies
      • SQLite                         • Other networking               • I18n and L10n modules
      • Oracle                  • RPC                                   • Boilerplates
      • NoSQL and Key/Value     • Web Sockets & Ajax                    • Continuous Integration Tools
           • Mongo              • Message Queues                        • DDD, CQRS, EventSourcing
           • Hive               • Class systems                         • Desktop application related
           • Redis              • Testing / Spec Frameworks             • JavaScript threads
           • CouchDB            • Wrappers                              • Other
                                                               https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/modules
Benchmarks [1]
Benchmarks [1]
Benchmarks [1]
Benchmarks [1]
Benchmarks [1 , 4 ]
• Analysis
  • Conducted by the owner of Erwin
  • Comparison of all event based languages
  • Tested on a single core

• Recognized by Tom Hughes-Croucher (representing Node)
  • Node is fairly new and yet it can compete with other mature technologies
  • Performance is not everything. Other factors (Usability, stability, etc)
     should be considered as well.
  • THEY ARE ALL AVERAGES BEING PLOTTED. Concern about exceptional
     cases (unusually long calls) may bring down the overall performance down.
Benchmarks [2]
Benchmarks
Analysis
• Conducted by 3rd party
• Comparing Node against Apache + PHP is
  an unfair experiment but is a realistic case.
• Benchmarking tool was sharing resources
  while the tests were run.
Benchmarks[5]
Benchmarks
Analysis
• Conducted by 3rd party
• Heavier work loads being tested – DB
  access was involved.
• Run on a single machine and was not
  distributed.
Benchmarks [3]

Analysis
• Conducted by 3rd party
• Simple random number generation / return
  test.
• Missing physical hardware set information.
Benchmarks – Final thoughts

• Node is worth investigating as it shows
  rapid growth in 3 years of existence.
• Needs higher quality benchmarking tests
  conducted in real life scenarios.
• Scholarly research is still scarce.
• Recommended domain areas – scalable
  web services, non critical software.
Usage [4]
Chat server – client may
 connect via telnet [4]
Sources
Web Posts:
[1] Ostinelli , Roberto. "A comparison between Misultin, Mochiweb, Cowboy, NodeJS and
Tornadoweb."www.ostinelli.net. Oostinelli, May 2011. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://www.ostinelli.net/a-comparison-
between-misultin-mochiweb-cowboy-nodejs-and-tornadoweb/>.
[2] Zgadzaj, Maciej. "Benchmarking Node.js - basic performance tests against Apache PHP."http://zgadzaj.com. N.p.,
August 19, 2010. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://zgadzaj.com/benchmarking-nodejs-basic-performance-tests-against-
apache-php>.
 [3] B, K. "Benchmarking nodejs : comparing nodejs and tomcat - random generator." http://fl-ex.blogspot.com. N.p.,
13 December 2011. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://fl-ex.blogspot.com/2011/12/comparing-random-generator-nodejs-
and.html>.
  [4] Hughes-Croucher, Tom, dir. Tech Talk: Tom Hughes-Croucher (Joyent) — “Node.js at Scale”. Joyent, 2011. Web. 19
Mar 2012. <http://sna-projects.com/blog/2011/08/nodejs/>. <http://sna-projects.com/blog/2011/08/nodejs/>.
[5] SUBBU, ALLAMARAJU. "Nodejs vs Play for Front-End Apps." subbu.org. N.p., MARCH 26, 2011. Web. 19 Mar
2012. <http://www.subbu.org/blog/2011/03/nodejs-vs-play-for-front-end-apps>.
IEEE Paper:
[6] Tilkov, S.;Vinoski, S.; , "Node.js: Using JavaScript to Build High-Performance Network Programs," Internet
Computing, IEEE , vol.14, no.6, pp.80-83, Nov.-Dec. 2010
doi: 10.1109/MIC.2010.145
URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5617064&isnumber=5617049
Why Node.js?
Why Node.js?

• Fast and scalable
• Transferrable knowledge
Why Node.js?

• Fast and scalable
• Transferrable knowledge
• Event driven with non-blocking I/O
Why Node.js?

• Fast and scalable
• Transferrable knowledge
• Event driven with non-blocking I/O
• Hundreds of modules
Modules
Modules
                        Socket.io
    http
                                    ejs
                                              Jade
Express       node-crypto

                                node-imap
   mongoose
                                          node-ftp
              node.bcrypt.js
Modules Used
Modules Used

• Express
• bcrypt
• mongoose
• Socket.io
• child_process
Express
var app = express.createServer();

app.get('/', function(req, res){
    res.send('Hello World');
});

app.listen(3000);
Express & REST
app.get('/user/playlist', function(req, res) {
    if (req.session.user) {
        Playlist.findOne({userid: req.session.user._id},
function(err, playlist) {
             if (playlist) {
                 res.json(playlist.songs);
             } else {
                 res.redirect('/404');
             }
        });
    } else {
        res.redirect('/404');
    }
});
Express & REST
app.post('/register', function(req, res) {
    var newUser = new User();

      newUser.username = req.body.username;
      newUser.password = req.body.password;
      newUser.display_name = req.body.displayname;
      newUser.date_created = new Date();

      newUser.save(function(err) {
          if (err) {
              res.redirect('error');
          } else {
              res.redirect('home');
          }
      });
});
Mongoose
var UserSchema = new Schema({
    username: {
        type: String,
        index: { unique: true }
    },
    password: String,
    salt: String,
    display_name: String
    date_created: Date
});

var User = mongoose.model('User', UserSchema);
socket.io

socket.on('disconnect', function() {
    if (socket.handshake.session.user) {
         var user =
socket.handshake.session.user.username;
         io.sockets.in(user).emit('exit', { user:
user });
    }
});
YouTube API
YouTube API

• Very well documented
• Tons of information available from player
• Easy to integrate
Problems
Problems

• mongoose schemas
• Socket.io access to sessions
• Handling groups of sockets
• Passing server-side data to front-end
• YouTube API and HTML5
What I Learned
What I Learned

• Easy to get an app up and running
• MongoDB is incredibly simple
• YouTube API is great to work with
Contact
Shael Joon                                              Matt Simonis

Rochester Institute of Technology   Rochester Institute of Technology

website: www.shaeljoon.com            website: www.mattsimonis.com

email: shaeljoon@gmail.com             email: matts12290@gmail.com

                                              twitter: @mattsimonis

More Related Content

Node.js

  • 2. Node.js Shael Joon & Matt Simonis
  • 3. Background • Server Side JavaScript • Developed by Ryan Dhal (2009) • Currently owned by Joyent • Based off Google’s V8 JavaScript Engine (which is written in C and C++) • Open Source
  • 4. It’s Asynchronous • Non-blocking due to system event notifications • Not having to deal with common multithreading problems such as deadlocks, resource sharing and etc. (See [6] for more details) • Scalability (930k[tested] to 1500k[claimed] connections) [4] • Most of the server and client side work can be done in JavaScript
  • 5. Usage domain areas/users Microsoft Node gives Azure users the first end-to-end JavaScript experience for the development of a whole new class of real-time applications. eBay Node’s evented I/O model freed us from worrying about locking and concurrency issues that are common with multithreaded async I/O. Linkedin On the server side, our entire mobile software stack is completely built in Node. One reason was scale. The second is Node showed us huge performance gains. Yahoo Node.js is the execution core of Manhattan. Allowing developers to build one code base using one language – that is the nirvana for developers. http://nodejs.org/
  • 6. Google Trends – “node.js” http://www.google.com/trends/?q=node.js
  • 7. Ample Resources • Free e-Books • Code Samples including 3rd party sources • Modules usage guides/samples • Benchmarking and comparisons to other technologies • However, it is missing scholarly papers and research.
  • 8. Modules • Modules are plugins/add-ons/extensions for Node to help with development process. • Often code examples are included alongside the module. • Several categories of modules. • Modules are plugins/add-ons/extensions for Node to help with development process.
  • 9. 3000+ modules in the areas below • Web frameworks • Templating • Parsers • Routers • CSS Engines • JSON • Static file servers • Content Management Systems • XML • Microframeworks • Build and Deployment • Command Line Option • Frameworks • Package Management Systems Parsers • Middleware • Module Loader • Parser Generators • JSGI • OpenSSL / Crypto / Hashing • Other Parsers • Connect • SMTP • Debugging / Console Utilities • Other middleware • TCP / IP • Compression • Other • Multiple protocols • Graphics • Database • HTTP • Sound • MS SQL Server • FTP • Payment Gateways • PostgreSQL • E-mail • API clients • MySQL • XMPP • Control flow / Async goodies • SQLite • Other networking • I18n and L10n modules • Oracle • RPC • Boilerplates • NoSQL and Key/Value • Web Sockets & Ajax • Continuous Integration Tools • Mongo • Message Queues • DDD, CQRS, EventSourcing • Hive • Class systems • Desktop application related • Redis • Testing / Spec Frameworks • JavaScript threads • CouchDB • Wrappers • Other https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/modules
  • 14. Benchmarks [1 , 4 ] • Analysis • Conducted by the owner of Erwin • Comparison of all event based languages • Tested on a single core • Recognized by Tom Hughes-Croucher (representing Node) • Node is fairly new and yet it can compete with other mature technologies • Performance is not everything. Other factors (Usability, stability, etc) should be considered as well. • THEY ARE ALL AVERAGES BEING PLOTTED. Concern about exceptional cases (unusually long calls) may bring down the overall performance down.
  • 16. Benchmarks Analysis • Conducted by 3rd party • Comparing Node against Apache + PHP is an unfair experiment but is a realistic case. • Benchmarking tool was sharing resources while the tests were run.
  • 18. Benchmarks Analysis • Conducted by 3rd party • Heavier work loads being tested – DB access was involved. • Run on a single machine and was not distributed.
  • 19. Benchmarks [3] Analysis • Conducted by 3rd party • Simple random number generation / return test. • Missing physical hardware set information.
  • 20. Benchmarks – Final thoughts • Node is worth investigating as it shows rapid growth in 3 years of existence. • Needs higher quality benchmarking tests conducted in real life scenarios. • Scholarly research is still scarce. • Recommended domain areas – scalable web services, non critical software.
  • 22. Chat server – client may connect via telnet [4]
  • 23. Sources Web Posts: [1] Ostinelli , Roberto. "A comparison between Misultin, Mochiweb, Cowboy, NodeJS and Tornadoweb."www.ostinelli.net. Oostinelli, May 2011. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://www.ostinelli.net/a-comparison- between-misultin-mochiweb-cowboy-nodejs-and-tornadoweb/>. [2] Zgadzaj, Maciej. "Benchmarking Node.js - basic performance tests against Apache PHP."http://zgadzaj.com. N.p., August 19, 2010. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://zgadzaj.com/benchmarking-nodejs-basic-performance-tests-against- apache-php>.  [3] B, K. "Benchmarking nodejs : comparing nodejs and tomcat - random generator." http://fl-ex.blogspot.com. N.p., 13 December 2011. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://fl-ex.blogspot.com/2011/12/comparing-random-generator-nodejs- and.html>.   [4] Hughes-Croucher, Tom, dir. Tech Talk: Tom Hughes-Croucher (Joyent) — “Node.js at Scale”. Joyent, 2011. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://sna-projects.com/blog/2011/08/nodejs/>. <http://sna-projects.com/blog/2011/08/nodejs/>. [5] SUBBU, ALLAMARAJU. "Nodejs vs Play for Front-End Apps." subbu.org. N.p., MARCH 26, 2011. Web. 19 Mar 2012. <http://www.subbu.org/blog/2011/03/nodejs-vs-play-for-front-end-apps>. IEEE Paper: [6] Tilkov, S.;Vinoski, S.; , "Node.js: Using JavaScript to Build High-Performance Network Programs," Internet Computing, IEEE , vol.14, no.6, pp.80-83, Nov.-Dec. 2010 doi: 10.1109/MIC.2010.145 URL: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5617064&isnumber=5617049
  • 25. Why Node.js? • Fast and scalable • Transferrable knowledge
  • 26. Why Node.js? • Fast and scalable • Transferrable knowledge • Event driven with non-blocking I/O
  • 27. Why Node.js? • Fast and scalable • Transferrable knowledge • Event driven with non-blocking I/O • Hundreds of modules
  • 29. Modules Socket.io http ejs Jade Express node-crypto node-imap mongoose node-ftp node.bcrypt.js
  • 31. Modules Used • Express • bcrypt • mongoose • Socket.io • child_process
  • 32. Express var app = express.createServer(); app.get('/', function(req, res){ res.send('Hello World'); }); app.listen(3000);
  • 33. Express & REST app.get('/user/playlist', function(req, res) { if (req.session.user) { Playlist.findOne({userid: req.session.user._id}, function(err, playlist) { if (playlist) { res.json(playlist.songs); } else { res.redirect('/404'); } }); } else { res.redirect('/404'); } });
  • 34. Express & REST app.post('/register', function(req, res) { var newUser = new User(); newUser.username = req.body.username; newUser.password = req.body.password; newUser.display_name = req.body.displayname; newUser.date_created = new Date(); newUser.save(function(err) { if (err) { res.redirect('error'); } else { res.redirect('home'); } }); });
  • 35. Mongoose var UserSchema = new Schema({ username: { type: String, index: { unique: true } }, password: String, salt: String, display_name: String date_created: Date }); var User = mongoose.model('User', UserSchema);
  • 36. socket.io socket.on('disconnect', function() { if (socket.handshake.session.user) { var user = socket.handshake.session.user.username; io.sockets.in(user).emit('exit', { user: user }); } });
  • 38. YouTube API • Very well documented • Tons of information available from player • Easy to integrate
  • 40. Problems • mongoose schemas • Socket.io access to sessions • Handling groups of sockets • Passing server-side data to front-end • YouTube API and HTML5
  • 42. What I Learned • Easy to get an app up and running • MongoDB is incredibly simple • YouTube API is great to work with
  • 43. Contact Shael Joon Matt Simonis Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester Institute of Technology website: www.shaeljoon.com website: www.mattsimonis.com email: shaeljoon@gmail.com email: matts12290@gmail.com twitter: @mattsimonis