This document summarizes New Zealand's proposed agriculture emissions trading scheme:
1) It would cover methane from livestock and nitrous oxide from fertilizer, applying to dairy and meat processors initially and transitioning to farmers by 2015.
2) Regulations would define emission factors, reporting requirements, and allocation baselines to incentivize emission reductions while avoiding perverse outcomes.
3) Costs to participants would vary depending on emission intensities and commodity prices, but moving the point of obligation to farmers could significantly increase participation and incentives while making compliance more difficult.
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 16
More Related Content
New Zealand ETS: Agriculture - Hayden Montgomery - EPA Domestic Offsetting Workshop May 2011
1. Agriculture emissions
• Methane from enteric
fermentation and animal
waste
• Nitrous oxide from fertiliser,
dung and urine
• NZ ETS covers 96% of
agriculture emissions
2. ETS - Agriculture
Sector Voluntary Mandatory Full obligations
reporting reporting
Forestry - - 1 Jan 2008
Transport fuels - 1 Jan 2010 1 July 2010
Electricity - 1 Jan 2010 1 July 2010
production
Industrial - 1 Jan 2010 1 July 2010
processes
Synthetic gases 1 Jan 2011 1 Jan 2012 1 Jan 2013
Waste 1 Jan 2011 1 Jan 2012 1 Jan 2013
Agriculture 1 Jan 2011 1 Jan 2012 1 Jan 2015
3. Participants
Dairy processors
Meat processors
Egg producers
Live animal exporters
Fertiliser importers and
manufacturers
4. Changing the Participant
The participant to be changed from processor to
farmer provided:
– information can be verified
– Leads to a reduction of emissions
– Compliance and administration costs are minimised
– Fiscal costs to the Government are minimised
5. Regulation development:
2010: Exemptions
2010: Emission factors and reporting
2011: Unique emission factors
2011: ETS Review
2012: Allocation baselines and process
6. Proposed Exemptions - species
Species
i.e. Horses, Llama and Alpaca, Emus
and Ostriches
Threshold level exemption
i.e. importing fertiliser less than 1 tonne
of N fertiliser
7. ETS Agriculture Regulations
• Cover emission factors and information requirements
• Aligned as much as possible with existing industry
information
• Trying to avoid:
• Double counting of emissions
• Perverse effects e.g. bobby calves
• Trying to:
• Reflect integrated nature of modern farming
• Reward efficiency gains
• Provide participants with certainty
8. Emission factors and Reporting
- Dairy processors
Cow Emissions =
MS (tonnes) x 6.14
Goat Emissions =
MS (tonnes) x 2.69
Sheep Emissions =
butter fat (tonnes) x 7.61
9. Emission factors and Reporting
- Meat processors
Emissions =
(no. of animals x Em Factor1)
+
(tonnes of meat x Em Factor2)
10. Reporting - Fertiliser companies
Emissions =
(N imported or manufactured – N exported)
x 5.72
11. Allocation to agriculture
• Intensity based
• Assistance level is 90% of the baseline in 2015
• 1.3% per annum phase out from 2016
• The baseline will be average emissions per unit of output
100
90
Assistance Level
80
(% of Baseline)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
12. How much will it cost @ 2015?
Description Cost @ Cost @
$25/tonne $50/tonne
CO2e1 CO2e1
Kg MS $ 0.015 $ 0.03
Steer carcass (240 kg) $11.25 $22.50
Lamb carcass (17 kg) $ 0.94 $ 1.88
Hind carcass (50 kg) $ 2.84 $ 5.68
Tonne N $14.30 $28.60
1 2015 at $50/tonne and 90% allocation
13. Key design features for
incentivising action
• Point of obligation
• Emission factors – incorporation of mitigation technology
• Allocation: historic versus intensity
Point of obligation
Processor Farmer
Number of participants 40-50 45,000
Cost pa ($ millions) 5-7 25-57
Incentive to reduce Weak Strong
emissions
Compliance Easy to enforce More difficult
14. Complementary measures
• Information and awareness
– Speeding up technology transfer – $2m pa
– Joint industry/government investment in Overseer - $5 million
• Investment in research and development
– Current research investment – PGgRC $25m, MAF $40m
– Partnership between Government, dairy sector and fertiliser
companies in a major research trial on nitrification inhibitors
$10 million
– Establishment of a Centre for Agriculture Greenhouse Gas
Research $50 million
– Recognition of mitigation technology in NZ National GHG
Inventory
– Global Alliance
15. New Zealand Experience
• Take time to develop
methodology
• Continuous development –
stepped progression
• Founded on peer reviewed
science
• Clear and ongoing dialogue
with stakeholders