Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE MANAGEMENT:
 Performance management is defined as the process of
evaluating employee performance on the job in terms of job
requirements.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
 Performance appraisal is the systematic evaluation of the
individual with regard to his or her performance on the job
and his potential for development.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
 To improve employee’s performance.
 To review the performance of the employees over a given
period of time.
 To judge the gap between the actual and desired performance.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
 To help management in exercising organizational control.
 Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication
between superior – subordinates and management – employees.
 To diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the
individuals so as to identify the training and development needs
of the future.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
 To improve employee’s performance.
 To provide feedback to the employees regarding their past
performance.
 Provide information to assist in the other personal decisions
in the organization.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
 Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the
functions to be performed by the employees.
 To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource
functions of the organization such as recruitment, selection,
training and development.
 To reduce the grievances of the employees.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PROCESS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
1. Written Essay:
 An evaluator writes out a description of an employee's
strengths and weaknesses, past performance, and potential.
 The evaluator would also make suggestions for improvement.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
2. Critical incidents:
 An evaluator will be considering only specific behaviours, not
vaguely defined personality traits, are cited.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
3. Graphic Rating Scales:
 Employee will be evaluated on various criteria (especially on
his quality in all kind of job) on scale basis.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
4. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales:
 The appraiser rates an employee according to items along a
numerical scale, but the items are examples of actual behaviour
on a single job rather than general descriptions or traits.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
5. Multi person comparison:
 Employees are compared with work output of other fellow
employees.
 The three most popular approaches to multi person comparisons
includes:
1. Group order ranking
2. Individual ranking
3. Paired comparison.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
6. MBO:
 Employees are evaluated by how well they contribute to the
organization.
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
7. 360° Appraisal:
 Feedback will be received from supervisors, employees and co-
workers, etc. peer
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS:
R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT

More Related Content

Performance management

  • 2. PEFORMANCE MANAGEMENT:  Performance management is defined as the process of evaluating employee performance on the job in terms of job requirements. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 3. PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL:  Performance appraisal is the systematic evaluation of the individual with regard to his or her performance on the job and his potential for development. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 4. OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:  To improve employee’s performance.  To review the performance of the employees over a given period of time.  To judge the gap between the actual and desired performance. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 5. OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:  To help management in exercising organizational control.  Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior – subordinates and management – employees.  To diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the individuals so as to identify the training and development needs of the future. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 6. OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:  To improve employee’s performance.  To provide feedback to the employees regarding their past performance.  Provide information to assist in the other personal decisions in the organization. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 7. OBJECTIVE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL:  Provide clarity of the expectations and responsibilities of the functions to be performed by the employees.  To judge the effectiveness of the other human resource functions of the organization such as recruitment, selection, training and development.  To reduce the grievances of the employees. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 8. PROCESS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL: R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 9. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 1. Written Essay:  An evaluator writes out a description of an employee's strengths and weaknesses, past performance, and potential.  The evaluator would also make suggestions for improvement. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 10. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 2. Critical incidents:  An evaluator will be considering only specific behaviours, not vaguely defined personality traits, are cited. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 11. PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 3. Graphic Rating Scales:  Employee will be evaluated on various criteria (especially on his quality in all kind of job) on scale basis. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 12. PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 4. Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales:  The appraiser rates an employee according to items along a numerical scale, but the items are examples of actual behaviour on a single job rather than general descriptions or traits. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 13. PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 5. Multi person comparison:  Employees are compared with work output of other fellow employees.  The three most popular approaches to multi person comparisons includes: 1. Group order ranking 2. Individual ranking 3. Paired comparison. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 14. PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 6. MBO:  Employees are evaluated by how well they contribute to the organization. R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT
  • 15. PEFORMANCE APPRAISAL METHODS: 7. 360° Appraisal:  Feedback will be received from supervisors, employees and co- workers, etc. peer R.ArunKumar,AP/Mech,RIT