Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Performance Management and
Performance Appraisals
Dr. Thin Nwe Oo
Associate Professor
Dept. of Management Studies
Yangon University of Economics
2
What is Performance?
Doing something successfully by using skills,
knowledge and motivation
“Outcomes, results or accomplishments”
3
Performance Management
a process to establish a shared understanding
about what is to be achieved, and an
approach to managing and developing people
in order to achieve it
Getting better results for the organization via
the measurement of individual performance
4
Nature of Performance Management
• Performance Management
 Processes used to identify, encourage, measure,
evaluate, improve, and reward employee performance
 Provide information to employees about their performance.
 Clarify organizational performance expectations.
 Identify the development steps that are needed to enhance
employee performance.
 Document performance for personnel actions.
 Informing and getting agreement on individual performance
 Facilitate them to achieve better results
 Provide rewards for achieving performance objectives.
5
Performance Management is A Part of
HRM Cycle
Recruitment &
Selection
Performance Appraisal
Reward
Training and
Development
Performance depends upon each of the four components and how they are coordinated
6
PerformancePerformance
ManagementManagement
LinkageLinkage
7
Types of Performance InformationTypes of Performance Information
8
Performance Standards
• Performance Standards
▫ Expected levels of performance
 Benchmarks, goals, and targets
▫ Characteristics of well-defined standards
 Realistic
 Measurable
 Clearly understood
 Challenging
E.g. - Finish 20 bags per hour
- Making 20 presentation with at least grade B in first semester
- Innovate 3 new products in the first three months
9
Performance Appraisal
• “The systematic description of an
employee’s strengths and weaknesses”
• The process of evaluating how well
employees perform their jobs when
compared to a set of standards, and then
communicating the information to
employees.
9
10
Performance Appraisal
▫ Informal appraisals: ongoing basic within the
organization
▫ Formal appraisals: occurrence at certain intervals
throughout that person’s history of employment
Performance Appraisal is a part of Performance Measurement Process
11
Uses of Performance Appraisal
Performance
Appraisal
Performance
Appraisal
To provide rewardsTo provide rewards To provide trainingTo provide training To review potentialTo review potential
12
Benefits of Performance Appraisal
Individual
• Objectives can be
established in relation the
whole organization
• Key results and timescale
can be established
• Can compare past
performance and future
activities against standards
• Can be known pay on the
basis of performance
Organization
• Suitable promotion
candidates can be identified
• Areas of improvement can
be seen
• Communication is improved
• Basis for medium to long
term HR planning
13
The Process of Performance Appraisal
• Step 1- Identification of criteria
• Step 2- Appraise for a period of time
• Step 3- Prepare an appraisal report by manager
• Step 4- Appraisal interview
• Step 5- Modify the report if necessary as a result
of interview
• Step 6- Review of the assessment
• Step 7- Prepare the action plan for improvement
• Step 8- Implement the action plan
• Step 9- Follow up the result
14
Where to Appraise?
Common
Performance
Measures
Quantity of
Output
Quality of
Output
Timeliness of
Output
Presence at
Work
15
Appraisal Techniques
• Graphic Rating Scales
• Check List
• Essay
• Behavioral Rating Scales
• Management by Objectives (MBO)
16
TraditionalTraditional
PerformancePerformance
Appraisal ProcessAppraisal Process
17
Types of Appraisals
• Downward Appraisal
• Upward Appraisal
• Peer Appraisal
• Self Appraisal
• Customer Appraisal
• Multi-source or 360 degree Appraisal
18
Who Conducts Appraisals?
Supervisors rating
their employees
Employees rating
their superiors
Multi-source
Outside sources
rating employees
Team members
rating each other
Employees rating
themselves
Sources of
Performance
Appraisals
19
Multi-source Appraisal
20
Appraisal Interview
• Interview between Manger (may be one of
the appraiser) and subordinate (appraisee)
• The purpose is to encourage collaborative
problem solving and improvement planning
• Three styles of manager that can be adopted
– Tell and sell
– Tell and listen
– Problem solving
21
Appraisal Errors
• Halo error: A situation in which a supervisor
generalizes from one dimension of a person’s
job performance to all dimensions of
performance.
• Error of central tendency: An error that occurs
when a manager rates all employees average,
even when their performances vary.
• Leniency error: A situation occurs when
manager rates all employees in a group higher
than they deserve.
22
Why PA May Fail
Unclear
Language
Mgr not taking
PA seriously
Mgr not
prepared
No on-going
feedback
Mgr not
honest or
sincere
Ineffective
discussion
Lack appraisal
skills
Mgr Lacks
Information
Insuff.
Rewards
23
Sources of Ineffective Performance
Organization Policies and
Practices
• Ineffective job placement
• Insufficient job training
• Lack of attention to employee
needs or concerns
• Inadequate communication
within organization
• Unclear reporting relationship
Job Concerns
• Boredom job
• Lack of growth or
advancement opportunities
• Unsafe working conditions
• Excessive workload
• Lack of job skills
Personal Problems
• Marital problems
• Financial worries
• Emotional disorders
• Conflict between work
demand and family demand
• Other family problems
• Lack of effort
External Factors
• Industry decline or extreme
competition
• Conflict between ethical
standards and job demands
24
Contemporary PA Concepts
Management by objectives (MBO)
360-degree feedback
Self-managed teams
25
Self-Managed Teams
Characteristics
• Focusing group result
• Larger Span of control
• More part-
time/contract workers
• More cross-functional
workers
Challenges
• Measuring individual
result  Unfair & Hard
• Quality and
commitment std. 
Diverse
• Measure cross-
functional performance
 Tough
26

More Related Content

Performance Management and Performance Appraisals

  • 1. 1 Performance Management and Performance Appraisals Dr. Thin Nwe Oo Associate Professor Dept. of Management Studies Yangon University of Economics
  • 2. 2 What is Performance? Doing something successfully by using skills, knowledge and motivation “Outcomes, results or accomplishments”
  • 3. 3 Performance Management a process to establish a shared understanding about what is to be achieved, and an approach to managing and developing people in order to achieve it Getting better results for the organization via the measurement of individual performance
  • 4. 4 Nature of Performance Management • Performance Management  Processes used to identify, encourage, measure, evaluate, improve, and reward employee performance  Provide information to employees about their performance.  Clarify organizational performance expectations.  Identify the development steps that are needed to enhance employee performance.  Document performance for personnel actions.  Informing and getting agreement on individual performance  Facilitate them to achieve better results  Provide rewards for achieving performance objectives.
  • 5. 5 Performance Management is A Part of HRM Cycle Recruitment & Selection Performance Appraisal Reward Training and Development Performance depends upon each of the four components and how they are coordinated
  • 7. 7 Types of Performance InformationTypes of Performance Information
  • 8. 8 Performance Standards • Performance Standards ▫ Expected levels of performance  Benchmarks, goals, and targets ▫ Characteristics of well-defined standards  Realistic  Measurable  Clearly understood  Challenging E.g. - Finish 20 bags per hour - Making 20 presentation with at least grade B in first semester - Innovate 3 new products in the first three months
  • 9. 9 Performance Appraisal • “The systematic description of an employee’s strengths and weaknesses” • The process of evaluating how well employees perform their jobs when compared to a set of standards, and then communicating the information to employees. 9
  • 10. 10 Performance Appraisal ▫ Informal appraisals: ongoing basic within the organization ▫ Formal appraisals: occurrence at certain intervals throughout that person’s history of employment Performance Appraisal is a part of Performance Measurement Process
  • 11. 11 Uses of Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal To provide rewardsTo provide rewards To provide trainingTo provide training To review potentialTo review potential
  • 12. 12 Benefits of Performance Appraisal Individual • Objectives can be established in relation the whole organization • Key results and timescale can be established • Can compare past performance and future activities against standards • Can be known pay on the basis of performance Organization • Suitable promotion candidates can be identified • Areas of improvement can be seen • Communication is improved • Basis for medium to long term HR planning
  • 13. 13 The Process of Performance Appraisal • Step 1- Identification of criteria • Step 2- Appraise for a period of time • Step 3- Prepare an appraisal report by manager • Step 4- Appraisal interview • Step 5- Modify the report if necessary as a result of interview • Step 6- Review of the assessment • Step 7- Prepare the action plan for improvement • Step 8- Implement the action plan • Step 9- Follow up the result
  • 14. 14 Where to Appraise? Common Performance Measures Quantity of Output Quality of Output Timeliness of Output Presence at Work
  • 15. 15 Appraisal Techniques • Graphic Rating Scales • Check List • Essay • Behavioral Rating Scales • Management by Objectives (MBO)
  • 17. 17 Types of Appraisals • Downward Appraisal • Upward Appraisal • Peer Appraisal • Self Appraisal • Customer Appraisal • Multi-source or 360 degree Appraisal
  • 18. 18 Who Conducts Appraisals? Supervisors rating their employees Employees rating their superiors Multi-source Outside sources rating employees Team members rating each other Employees rating themselves Sources of Performance Appraisals
  • 20. 20 Appraisal Interview • Interview between Manger (may be one of the appraiser) and subordinate (appraisee) • The purpose is to encourage collaborative problem solving and improvement planning • Three styles of manager that can be adopted – Tell and sell – Tell and listen – Problem solving
  • 21. 21 Appraisal Errors • Halo error: A situation in which a supervisor generalizes from one dimension of a person’s job performance to all dimensions of performance. • Error of central tendency: An error that occurs when a manager rates all employees average, even when their performances vary. • Leniency error: A situation occurs when manager rates all employees in a group higher than they deserve.
  • 22. 22 Why PA May Fail Unclear Language Mgr not taking PA seriously Mgr not prepared No on-going feedback Mgr not honest or sincere Ineffective discussion Lack appraisal skills Mgr Lacks Information Insuff. Rewards
  • 23. 23 Sources of Ineffective Performance Organization Policies and Practices • Ineffective job placement • Insufficient job training • Lack of attention to employee needs or concerns • Inadequate communication within organization • Unclear reporting relationship Job Concerns • Boredom job • Lack of growth or advancement opportunities • Unsafe working conditions • Excessive workload • Lack of job skills Personal Problems • Marital problems • Financial worries • Emotional disorders • Conflict between work demand and family demand • Other family problems • Lack of effort External Factors • Industry decline or extreme competition • Conflict between ethical standards and job demands
  • 24. 24 Contemporary PA Concepts Management by objectives (MBO) 360-degree feedback Self-managed teams
  • 25. 25 Self-Managed Teams Characteristics • Focusing group result • Larger Span of control • More part- time/contract workers • More cross-functional workers Challenges • Measuring individual result  Unfair & Hard • Quality and commitment std.  Diverse • Measure cross- functional performance  Tough
  • 26. 26