Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Placemat v_final

•
•
M
Max Biel

The document discusses the history and evolution of Boston's public transit system, the MBTA. It describes how the MBTA has advanced from horses to electricity to moving toward renewable energy. It also discusses how growing populations and car usage led to increased demand for public transit and expansion of services. Leadership of the transit system changed over time from private companies to government authorities. The MBTA has a history of debt issues caused by factors like expansion projects and rising energy costs. The document proposes a vision for an effectively run MBTA with characteristics like up-to-date technology, strong leadership, financial stability, and long-term viability.

1 of 2
Download to read offline
Advancements in Technology: The technology of Boston’s public transit system has continued to advanced over time. The first trolley was pulled by horses then was run by electricity. Presently, the MBTA is moving toward renewable energy. Evolving Environment: The prevalence of cars and the development of roads in the 1950s and 60s contributed to congestion in the city. Growing populations spurred an increased demand for public transit and expansion of these services. The MBTA needed to reduce congestion and accommodate all commuters. Changing Leadership: The MTA absorbed what was left of the “BERY” in 1947. Thereafter, in 1964, the MTA became the MBTA, and assumed the responsibility of expanding the transit system. Expansion: Throughout history, the MTA, and later the MBTA, expanded to reach new patrons. The MTA took control over the “BERY” where the MTA would expand transportation service into surrounding suburbs of Boston. The Big Dig also contributed to expansion of the MBTA. Policy: The Public Control Act in 1919 gave the state control over the transit system and mandated a five cent fare. Additionally, The Conservation Law Foundation specified various public transit improvements projects that had to be completed for the Big Dig to move forward and sued the MBTA for violating the Clean Air Act. An agreement was reached and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts created a pact to expand public transit in order to compensate for increased automobile pollution. As a result the MBTA expanded and put it the MBTA in debt. Continued Debt: The MBTA has a long history of issues with financing. Back in 1980, the T shut down due to lack of funds. The Big Dig also put the MBTA in immense debt along with the rising energy costs. What does an effectively run MBTA look like? Mission Envision a world where the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) runs efficiently, is always on time, matches capacity with demand, operates sustainably, and is holistically stable. Historical Patterns as a Reflection of Today Old Technology Poor Adaptability Unclear Leadership Vision Focus on Expansion Restrictive Policy Debt Current Issues Facing the MBTA Financial StabilityStructural Stability 1 Up-to-date technology 2 Adaptable to changing market conditions 3 4 Consumer friendly environment Long-term Viability 1 2 3 4 Near match of expenses and revenues Strong leadership and vision Minimized liabilities/debt Consistent public accountability Characteristics of a strong and healthy organization
Leadership StructureInfrastructure Upgrades (Specific): FY 23 FY 24 FY 25FY 22FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 Legislation & Leadership Reform • Distribute debt amongst Municipalities • Reverse Forward Funding • Allow for government escalation Launch Infrastructure Upgrades • Match car capacity with transit demand • Implement sustainable tech to improve energy consumption • Create a smooth consumer experience that boards and empties efficiently • Prioritize upgrades based on price and need Annual Fiscal Audits (done externally) Plan Focus: • Create financial stability • Improve Internal Operations core management • Upgrade infrastructure incrementally • Create long-term viability for MBTA Money Upgrades Expenses Revenues Financial Stability Denotes upgrade • Create Internal Operations subcommittee • Facilitate vertical visibility & communication • Deter from impulsive financial decisions 1 2 3 4 5 Ten-Year Plan – Example Timeline Operations Subcommittee (heads of each sector) Research and Design Human Resources Contingency Planning Mechanics Bi-weekly Report MassDOT Car Capacity Upgrade to match the public transportation demand Integrated Sustainable Technology such as Regenerative Braking Updated Payment System similar to the OysterCard in the London Underground Updated Traffic Signals to accommodate for increased traffic Eliminate Stops due to ridership stats or proximity to others

More Related Content

Placemat v_final

  • 1. Advancements in Technology: The technology of Boston’s public transit system has continued to advanced over time. The first trolley was pulled by horses then was run by electricity. Presently, the MBTA is moving toward renewable energy. Evolving Environment: The prevalence of cars and the development of roads in the 1950s and 60s contributed to congestion in the city. Growing populations spurred an increased demand for public transit and expansion of these services. The MBTA needed to reduce congestion and accommodate all commuters. Changing Leadership: The MTA absorbed what was left of the “BERY” in 1947. Thereafter, in 1964, the MTA became the MBTA, and assumed the responsibility of expanding the transit system. Expansion: Throughout history, the MTA, and later the MBTA, expanded to reach new patrons. The MTA took control over the “BERY” where the MTA would expand transportation service into surrounding suburbs of Boston. The Big Dig also contributed to expansion of the MBTA. Policy: The Public Control Act in 1919 gave the state control over the transit system and mandated a five cent fare. Additionally, The Conservation Law Foundation specified various public transit improvements projects that had to be completed for the Big Dig to move forward and sued the MBTA for violating the Clean Air Act. An agreement was reached and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts created a pact to expand public transit in order to compensate for increased automobile pollution. As a result the MBTA expanded and put it the MBTA in debt. Continued Debt: The MBTA has a long history of issues with financing. Back in 1980, the T shut down due to lack of funds. The Big Dig also put the MBTA in immense debt along with the rising energy costs. What does an effectively run MBTA look like? Mission Envision a world where the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) runs efficiently, is always on time, matches capacity with demand, operates sustainably, and is holistically stable. Historical Patterns as a Reflection of Today Old Technology Poor Adaptability Unclear Leadership Vision Focus on Expansion Restrictive Policy Debt Current Issues Facing the MBTA Financial StabilityStructural Stability 1 Up-to-date technology 2 Adaptable to changing market conditions 3 4 Consumer friendly environment Long-term Viability 1 2 3 4 Near match of expenses and revenues Strong leadership and vision Minimized liabilities/debt Consistent public accountability Characteristics of a strong and healthy organization
  • 2. Leadership StructureInfrastructure Upgrades (Specific): FY 23 FY 24 FY 25FY 22FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 Legislation & Leadership Reform • Distribute debt amongst Municipalities • Reverse Forward Funding • Allow for government escalation Launch Infrastructure Upgrades • Match car capacity with transit demand • Implement sustainable tech to improve energy consumption • Create a smooth consumer experience that boards and empties efficiently • Prioritize upgrades based on price and need Annual Fiscal Audits (done externally) Plan Focus: • Create financial stability • Improve Internal Operations core management • Upgrade infrastructure incrementally • Create long-term viability for MBTA Money Upgrades Expenses Revenues Financial Stability Denotes upgrade • Create Internal Operations subcommittee • Facilitate vertical visibility & communication • Deter from impulsive financial decisions 1 2 3 4 5 Ten-Year Plan – Example Timeline Operations Subcommittee (heads of each sector) Research and Design Human Resources Contingency Planning Mechanics Bi-weekly Report MassDOT Car Capacity Upgrade to match the public transportation demand Integrated Sustainable Technology such as Regenerative Braking Updated Payment System similar to the OysterCard in the London Underground Updated Traffic Signals to accommodate for increased traffic Eliminate Stops due to ridership stats or proximity to others