Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Member of:
        Devi Oktaviani     10004290
       Karia Gawantri      10004362
       Marlin Dwinastiti   10004402
Vinita Ajeng S             10004405
        Rosi Diana Indah M 10004416
ï‚ž Designing   Evaluations is a guide to
  successfully completing evaluation design
  tasks.
ï‚ž Designing Evaluations is one of a series of
  papers whose purpose is to provide guides to
  various aspects of audit and evaluation
  methodology and indicate where more detailed
  information is available.
ï‚žA   program evaluation is a systematic study
  using research methods to collect and
  analyze data to assess how well a program
  is working and why.
ï‚ž Some evaluations attempt to isolate the
  causal impacts of programs from other
  influences on outcomes, whereas
  performance measurement typically does
  not.
ï‚ž Incontrast, evaluations conducted to
 provide an independent assessment of a
 program’s strengths and weaknesses
 should be conducted by a team
 independent of program management.
 Evaluations purchased by agencies from
 professional evaluation firms can often
 be considered independent.
1. Clarify understanding of the program’s goals
   and strategy.
2. Develop relevant and useful evaluation
   questions.
3. Select an appropriate evaluation approach or
   design for each evaluation question.
4. Identify data sources and collection
   procedures to obtain relevant, credible
   information.
5. Develop plans to analyze the data in ways that
   allow valid conclusions to be drawn from the
   evaluation questions.
1.   the evaluation questions, objectives, and
     scope;
2.   information sources and measures, or what
     information is needed;
3.   data collection methods, including any
     sampling procedures, or how information or
     evidence will be obtained;
4.   an analysis plan, including evaluative
     criteria or comparisons, or how or on what
     basis program performance will be judged
     or evaluated;
5.   an assessment of study limitations.
ï‚ž Designingan evaluation plan is iterative:
 evaluation objectives, scope, and
 methodology are defined together
 because what determines them often
 overlaps
ï‚ž  Implementation evaluations are very
  similar to performance monitoring in
  assessing the quality and efficiency of
  program operations, service delivery, and
  service use, except that they are
  conducted as separate projects, not
  integrated into the program’s daily routine.
ï‚ž Implementation evaluations may be
  conducted to provide feedback to program
  managers, accountability to program
  sponsors and the public, or insight into
  variation in program outcomes.
1.   Focusing the Evaluation
2.   Collecting the Information
3.   Using the Information
4.   Managing the Evaluation
a.   Kind of information to be acquired
b.   Sources of information (for example, types of
     respondents)
c.   Methods to be used for sampling sources (for
     example, random sampling)
d.   Methods of collecting information
e.   Timing and frequency of information
     collection
f.   Analysis plan
Thank You

More Related Content

Planning and Designing Evaluation

  • 1. Member of: Devi Oktaviani 10004290 Karia Gawantri 10004362 Marlin Dwinastiti 10004402 Vinita Ajeng S 10004405 Rosi Diana Indah M 10004416
  • 2. ï‚ž Designing Evaluations is a guide to successfully completing evaluation design tasks. ï‚ž Designing Evaluations is one of a series of papers whose purpose is to provide guides to various aspects of audit and evaluation methodology and indicate where more detailed information is available.
  • 3. ï‚žA program evaluation is a systematic study using research methods to collect and analyze data to assess how well a program is working and why. ï‚ž Some evaluations attempt to isolate the causal impacts of programs from other influences on outcomes, whereas performance measurement typically does not.
  • 4. ï‚ž Incontrast, evaluations conducted to provide an independent assessment of a program’s strengths and weaknesses should be conducted by a team independent of program management. Evaluations purchased by agencies from professional evaluation firms can often be considered independent.
  • 5. 1. Clarify understanding of the program’s goals and strategy. 2. Develop relevant and useful evaluation questions. 3. Select an appropriate evaluation approach or design for each evaluation question. 4. Identify data sources and collection procedures to obtain relevant, credible information. 5. Develop plans to analyze the data in ways that allow valid conclusions to be drawn from the evaluation questions.
  • 6. 1. the evaluation questions, objectives, and scope; 2. information sources and measures, or what information is needed; 3. data collection methods, including any sampling procedures, or how information or evidence will be obtained; 4. an analysis plan, including evaluative criteria or comparisons, or how or on what basis program performance will be judged or evaluated; 5. an assessment of study limitations.
  • 7. ï‚ž Designingan evaluation plan is iterative: evaluation objectives, scope, and methodology are defined together because what determines them often overlaps
  • 8. ï‚ž Implementation evaluations are very similar to performance monitoring in assessing the quality and efficiency of program operations, service delivery, and service use, except that they are conducted as separate projects, not integrated into the program’s daily routine. ï‚ž Implementation evaluations may be conducted to provide feedback to program managers, accountability to program sponsors and the public, or insight into variation in program outcomes.
  • 9. 1. Focusing the Evaluation 2. Collecting the Information 3. Using the Information 4. Managing the Evaluation
  • 10. a. Kind of information to be acquired b. Sources of information (for example, types of respondents) c. Methods to be used for sampling sources (for example, random sampling) d. Methods of collecting information e. Timing and frequency of information collection f. Analysis plan