Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
MOOC ON
POLITICAL THEORY: CONCEPTS & DEBATES
MODULE 6
POWER: Bases of Power & Authority
Introduction
Power has a cognate concept, the
concept of authority. Authority is a
special case of power. This involves
untested acceptance of another’s
judgment/command, and suspension
of self-judgment. Hence it is
successful ordering or forbidding,
domination or authoritarian power of
command.
The sub-types of authority based on varying motivations for
obedience, are:
(i) Coercive authority: It is based on show or use of repressive
force to which the object of authority (people, subject classes, or
masses) is exposed.
(ii) Authority by inducement: It is based on offer of rewards for compliance
rather than on threat or actual inflicting of deprivations for non-compliance.
(iii) Legitimate authority: It is based on power-holder’s acknowledged right
to command and power. The subjects, individually and collectively, have an
acknowledged obligation to obey the commands of the legitimate authority.
(iv) Competent authority: It is based on somebody claiming, enjoying authority
on the public acceptance that s/he has certain skills and the best example is the
bureaucracy.
(v) Personal authority: It is based on the subject’s desire to serve /obey only
because of the incumbent’s personal qualities (rather than role performance).
The modern state is the constitutional state. Even
rogue leaders of the state create constitution for their
state to insulate themselves from public criticism to
the extent possible. Hence, the constitution is a great
source of power and authority for the state.
Bases of Power and Authority
Hobbesian
Man’s experience of Power begins
with experience of power which is
locked in his own body
The objectives of a political movement may
be social reform, re-defining culture, or
initiate new economic programme. These are
evidently political movements for change;
some may even argue, for progress. The most
acute form of such movement is revolution
like the French Revolution or the October
Revolution.
Political Movements
Political movements themselves are power
configurations. Every political movement has
leadership, organization and a collective
following whatever the size of the following.
Leadership entails power and authority, and
concomitantly, hierarchy, surveillance and
control to secure compliance from the rank
and file, particularly, the dissenters.
Reforming Power
The nature of power as compliance-
seeking has not radically changed.
Only periodic and context specific
attempts are made to make the
compliance-seekers comply with
certain norms in their exercise of
power and authority.
The Gandhian project of swaraj also
celebrates de-centered power as the
most desirable arrangement.
Compared to creation of formal democracies,
the progress of struggles to introduce
democracy in everyday lives of primary and
secondary groups has been slow. Those who
are in power and hence benefit from the
prevailing political inequality do not easily
yield to democratizing processes -- as in power
and politics in conventional senses.
Power in political science of political theory

More Related Content

Power in political science of political theory

  • 1. MOOC ON POLITICAL THEORY: CONCEPTS & DEBATES MODULE 6 POWER: Bases of Power & Authority
  • 2. Introduction Power has a cognate concept, the concept of authority. Authority is a special case of power. This involves untested acceptance of another’s judgment/command, and suspension of self-judgment. Hence it is successful ordering or forbidding, domination or authoritarian power of command.
  • 3. The sub-types of authority based on varying motivations for obedience, are: (i) Coercive authority: It is based on show or use of repressive force to which the object of authority (people, subject classes, or masses) is exposed. (ii) Authority by inducement: It is based on offer of rewards for compliance rather than on threat or actual inflicting of deprivations for non-compliance.
  • 4. (iii) Legitimate authority: It is based on power-holder’s acknowledged right to command and power. The subjects, individually and collectively, have an acknowledged obligation to obey the commands of the legitimate authority. (iv) Competent authority: It is based on somebody claiming, enjoying authority on the public acceptance that s/he has certain skills and the best example is the bureaucracy. (v) Personal authority: It is based on the subject’s desire to serve /obey only because of the incumbent’s personal qualities (rather than role performance).
  • 5. The modern state is the constitutional state. Even rogue leaders of the state create constitution for their state to insulate themselves from public criticism to the extent possible. Hence, the constitution is a great source of power and authority for the state. Bases of Power and Authority
  • 6. Hobbesian Man’s experience of Power begins with experience of power which is locked in his own body
  • 7. The objectives of a political movement may be social reform, re-defining culture, or initiate new economic programme. These are evidently political movements for change; some may even argue, for progress. The most acute form of such movement is revolution like the French Revolution or the October Revolution. Political Movements
  • 8. Political movements themselves are power configurations. Every political movement has leadership, organization and a collective following whatever the size of the following. Leadership entails power and authority, and concomitantly, hierarchy, surveillance and control to secure compliance from the rank and file, particularly, the dissenters.
  • 9. Reforming Power The nature of power as compliance- seeking has not radically changed. Only periodic and context specific attempts are made to make the compliance-seekers comply with certain norms in their exercise of power and authority.
  • 10. The Gandhian project of swaraj also celebrates de-centered power as the most desirable arrangement.
  • 11. Compared to creation of formal democracies, the progress of struggles to introduce democracy in everyday lives of primary and secondary groups has been slow. Those who are in power and hence benefit from the prevailing political inequality do not easily yield to democratizing processes -- as in power and politics in conventional senses.