Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo
By- Pooja Garg, Saba,
Mavera Nehal
 Rapid Rural Appraisal consists of a series of
techniques for "quick and dirty" research that
are claimed to generate results of less apparent
precision, but greater evidential value, than
classic quantitative survey techniques
 RRA (and analogs) emerged in the 1970s as a
more efficient and cost-effective way of
learning by outsiders, particularly about
agricultural systems, than was possible by
large-scale social surveys or brief rural visits by
urban professionals.
 Review of secondary sources, including aerial photos,
even brief aerial observation
 Direct observation, foot transects, familiarization,
participation in activities
 Interviews with key informants, group interviews,
workshops
 Mapping, diagramming
 Biographies, local histories, case studies
 Ranking and scoring
 Time lines
 Short simple questionnaires, towards end of process
 Rapid report writing in the field.
 A growing combination of approaches and
methods that enable rural people to share, enhance
and analyze their knowledge of life and
conditions, to plan and act and to monitor and
evaluate.
 Emerged in 1980’s in Kenya.
 PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) used by
NGOs and other agencies involved in International
Development
 A set of participatory and largely visual techniques
for assessing group and community resources
 Identifying and prioritizing problems
 Appraising strategies for solving problems.
 Different tools are used to gather and analyze
information
 In PRA, data collection and analysis are
undertaken by local people, with outsiders
facilitating rather than controlling
 Outsider facilitates local people in analyzing
information, practicing critical self awareness,
taking responsibility and sharing their
knowledge of life and conditions to plan and to
act
 To incorporate the knowledge and opinions of
rural people in the planning and management
of development projects and programs
 To acquaint the participant with the basic
concept and methods of the participatory rural
appraisal techniques
 Empowerment
 Respect
 Localization
 Enjoyment
 Inclusiveness
 Using optimal ignorance
 Offsetting biases
 Be gender sensitive at all times.
 Reversal of roles
 Seeking for diversity and differences
 Learning rapidly and progressively (flexible
and interactive)
 Attitude
 Interactive
 Innovative
 Informal
 In the community
 Transact walk
 Resource map
 Seasonal calendar
 Ranking
 Matrix
 Venn diagram or Chapatti diagram
 Timelines
 Daily activity clock
 FGD’s (focused group discussions)
 Workshops
PRA RRA
 In PRA, information is
owned and shared by
local people. Outsiders
(professionals) go to rural
areas but they facilitate
rural people in collections,
presentation and analysis
of information by
themselves.
 The information is owned
by rural people but
usually shared with
outsiders.
 In RRA, information is
elicited and extracted by
outsiders. In other words,
people go the rural areas,
obtain information and
then bring it away to the
process and analyze.
 The information is owned
by outsiders and often not
shared with rural people.
PRA RRA
 Capacity building for
improved decision
making at community
level, situational analysis,
planning and monitoring
by community
 Team composed of
villagers, sometimes
facilitated by CRS staff
person that works with
larger community
 Inform project design,
gather baseline
information, monitor
and evaluate
 Multi- disciplinary team
of CRS staff and
specialists
PRA RRA
 Communities where
project activities will take
place
 Ongoing throughout the
life of project. Usually
begins with training initial
situational analysis (appx
10 days) leading to
Community Action Plan
 Limited number of
representative sites
 Discrete studies, usually
lasting 5-7 days
THANK
YOU!!

More Related Content

rapid rural appraisal and participatory rural appraisal

  • 1. By- Pooja Garg, Saba, Mavera Nehal
  • 2.  Rapid Rural Appraisal consists of a series of techniques for "quick and dirty" research that are claimed to generate results of less apparent precision, but greater evidential value, than classic quantitative survey techniques  RRA (and analogs) emerged in the 1970s as a more efficient and cost-effective way of learning by outsiders, particularly about agricultural systems, than was possible by large-scale social surveys or brief rural visits by urban professionals.
  • 3.  Review of secondary sources, including aerial photos, even brief aerial observation  Direct observation, foot transects, familiarization, participation in activities  Interviews with key informants, group interviews, workshops  Mapping, diagramming  Biographies, local histories, case studies  Ranking and scoring  Time lines  Short simple questionnaires, towards end of process  Rapid report writing in the field.
  • 4.  A growing combination of approaches and methods that enable rural people to share, enhance and analyze their knowledge of life and conditions, to plan and act and to monitor and evaluate.  Emerged in 1980’s in Kenya.  PRA (Participatory Rural Appraisal) used by NGOs and other agencies involved in International Development  A set of participatory and largely visual techniques for assessing group and community resources  Identifying and prioritizing problems  Appraising strategies for solving problems.
  • 5.  Different tools are used to gather and analyze information  In PRA, data collection and analysis are undertaken by local people, with outsiders facilitating rather than controlling  Outsider facilitates local people in analyzing information, practicing critical self awareness, taking responsibility and sharing their knowledge of life and conditions to plan and to act
  • 6.  To incorporate the knowledge and opinions of rural people in the planning and management of development projects and programs  To acquaint the participant with the basic concept and methods of the participatory rural appraisal techniques
  • 7.  Empowerment  Respect  Localization  Enjoyment  Inclusiveness
  • 8.  Using optimal ignorance  Offsetting biases  Be gender sensitive at all times.  Reversal of roles  Seeking for diversity and differences  Learning rapidly and progressively (flexible and interactive)  Attitude
  • 9.  Interactive  Innovative  Informal  In the community
  • 10.  Transact walk  Resource map
  • 14.  Venn diagram or Chapatti diagram
  • 16.  Daily activity clock  FGD’s (focused group discussions)  Workshops
  • 17. PRA RRA  In PRA, information is owned and shared by local people. Outsiders (professionals) go to rural areas but they facilitate rural people in collections, presentation and analysis of information by themselves.  The information is owned by rural people but usually shared with outsiders.  In RRA, information is elicited and extracted by outsiders. In other words, people go the rural areas, obtain information and then bring it away to the process and analyze.  The information is owned by outsiders and often not shared with rural people.
  • 18. PRA RRA  Capacity building for improved decision making at community level, situational analysis, planning and monitoring by community  Team composed of villagers, sometimes facilitated by CRS staff person that works with larger community  Inform project design, gather baseline information, monitor and evaluate  Multi- disciplinary team of CRS staff and specialists
  • 19. PRA RRA  Communities where project activities will take place  Ongoing throughout the life of project. Usually begins with training initial situational analysis (appx 10 days) leading to Community Action Plan  Limited number of representative sites  Discrete studies, usually lasting 5-7 days