Shell held a field visit for Socially Responsible Investors in Houston and in the Haynesville gas field, Louisiana, at which Russ Ford, EVP onshore gas, John Hollowell, EVP deepwater and Paul Goodfellow, VP production onshore gas all presented. The focus of the presentations and visit was to illustrate Shell’s tight gas operations in the context of sustainable development and our commitment to responsible deepwater operations.
1 of 13
Download to read offline
More Related Content
John Hollowell – Deepwater operations
1. ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
INVESTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
HOUSTON/SHREVEPORT
November 2011
JOHN HOLLOWELL
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT
DEEPWATER
1 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
2. DEFINITIONS AND CAUTIONARY NOTE
Resources: Our use of the term “resources” in this presentation includes quantities of oil and gas not yet classified as SEC proved oil and gas. Resources are consistent with the
Society of Petroleum Engineers 2P and 2C definitions.
The companies in which Royal Dutch Shell plc directly and indirectly owns investments are separate entities. In this presentation “Shell”, “Shell group” and “Royal Dutch Shell”
are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to Royal Dutch Shell plc and its subsidiaries in general. Likewise, the words “we”, “us” and “our” are also used
to refer to subsidiaries in general or to those who work for them. These expressions are also used where no useful purpose is served by identifying the particular company or
companies. ‘‘Subsidiaries’’, “Shell subsidiaries” and “Shell companies” as used in this presentation refer to companies in which Royal Dutch Shell either directly or indirectly
has control, by having either a majority of the voting rights or the right to exercise a controlling influence. The companies in which Shell has significant influence but not control
are referred to as “associated companies” or “associates” and companies in which Shell has joint control are referred to as “jointly controlled entities”. In this presentation,
associates and jointly controlled entities are also referred to as “equity-accounted investments”. The term “Shell interest” is used for convenience to indicate the direct and/or
indirect (for example, through our 24% shareholding in Woodside Petroleum Ltd.) ownership interest held by Shell in a venture, partnership or company, after exclusion of all
third-party interest.
This presentation contains forward-looking statements concerning the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of Royal Dutch Shell. All statements other than
statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectations that are based on
management’s current expectations and assumptions and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or events to differ
materially from those expressed or implied in these statements. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the potential exposure of Royal
Dutch Shell to market risks and statements expressing management’s expectations, beliefs, estimates, forecasts, projections and assumptions. These forward-looking statements
are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘could’’, “scheduled”, ‘‘estimate’’, ‘‘expect’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘intend’’, ‘‘may’’, ‘‘objectives’’,
‘‘outlook’’, ‘‘plan’’, ‘‘probably’’, ‘‘project’’, ‘‘risks’’, ‘‘seek’’, ‘‘should’’, ‘‘target’’, ‘‘will’’ and similar terms and phrases. There are a number of factors that could affect the future
operations of Royal Dutch Shell and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements included in this presentation, including
(without limitation): (a) price fluctuations in crude oil and natural gas; (b) changes in demand for Shell’s products; (c) currency fluctuations; (d) drilling and production results;
(e) reserves estimates; (f) loss of market share and industry competition; (g) environmental and physical risks; (h) risks associated with the identification of suitable potential
acquisition properties and targets, and successful negotiation and completion of such transactions; (i) the risk of doing business in developing countries and countries subject to
international sanctions; (j) legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments including regulatory measures addressing climate change; (k) economic and financial market
conditions in various countries and regions; (l) political risks, including the risks of expropriation and renegotiation of the terms of contracts with governmental entities, delays or
advancements in the approval of projects and delays in the reimbursement for shared costs; and (m) changes in trading conditions. All forward-looking statements contained in
this presentation are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Readers should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements. Additional factors that may affect future results are contained in Royal Dutch Shell’s Annual Presentation / Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2010 (available at www.shell.com/investor and www.sec.gov ). These factors also should be considered by the reader. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of
the date of this presentation, 29 November 2011. Neither Royal Dutch Shell nor any of its subsidiaries undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-
looking statement as a result of new information, future events or other information. In light of these risks, results could differ materially from those stated, implied or inferred
from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation.
We may have used certain terms in this presentation that United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strictly prohibits us from including in our filings with the SEC,
such as resources and oil in place. U.S. Investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 20-F, File No 1-32575, available on the SEC website www.sec.gov.
You can also obtain these forms from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.
2 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
4. GROWTH DELIVERY
DEEPWATER UNDER CONSTRUCTION
MARS-B (GULF OF MEXICO) BC-10 PHASE 2 (CAMPOS, BRAZIL) CARDAMOM (GULF OF MEXICO)
Development concept Phase 1 FPSO Surface System and Subsea View
TLP design capacity ~100 kboe/d Expected peak production ~30 Expected peak production ~50
West Boreas + South Deimos kboe/d kboe/d
Water depth 950 meters Argonauta O-North field Tie back to Auger platform
Shell 72% (operator) Water depth 1,600 meters Water depth 830 meters
Shell 50% (operator) Shell 100% (operator)
Part of >250 kboe/d deepwater production under construction
4 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
5. PROGRESS IN GULF OF MEXICO
SHELL GOM DEEPWATER PRODUCTION W. Boreas, S. Deimos Mars B
Kboe/d >150 million boe resources FID for new TLP, Shell 72%
Tie-back to Mars B (operator)
500 500
Shell 72% (operator) ~100 kboe/d
250 250
Vito
0 0 >200 million boe resources Nakika
'94 '98 '02 '06 '10 '15+ ~100 kboe/d potential Mars
Shell 55% (operator)
Cardamom Deep Ursa
Auger TLP extended reach Auger Brutus
discovery & appraisal Appomattox
> 100 million boe resources ~100 kboe/d hub potential
50 kboe/d
Holstein > 250 million boe resources
Shell 100% (operator) Shell 80% (operator)
Stones
Assessing development options
Caesar/Tonga Shell 35% (operator)
Perdido ~50 kboe/d
2009 FID
0 200 KM
Shell 22.5%
NEW HUB EXISTING PRODUCTION HUB SHELL LEASEHOLD CURRENT RIG LOCATIONS
2010 production ~230,000 boe/d
>250,000 boe/d new potential for Shell
5 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
6. NEW GROWTH AT AUGER: CARDAMOM DEEP
SEISMIC OVERVIEW PRODUCTION
Kboe/d
Auger
Platform
100 100
Auger
North
50 50
Auger
Main
Cardamom 0 0
'94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '15+
Shell 100% (operator) Auger TLP & Cardamom
Auger 1993: 1st application of a Tension Leg
1987 1993 1999-2004 2009/10 2011 ~2014
Platform in deepwater (820 meters water depth)
Discovered First Oil
First TLP
Subsea-Fields
Macaroni
Deep Deep Cardamom First
Cardamom Subsea system production
Cardamom Deep discoveries in 2009/10
Serrano discoveries FID (>100 million boe resources)
Oregano
Habanaro
Llano
FID 2011: 50 kboe/d expected peak production
6 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
7. PERDIDO –TECHNOLOGY LEADER
Shell 33.3% (operator); Peak production ~100 kboe/d RESERVOIR VIEW
Substantial oil in place > 3 billion boe
We expect recoverable resources > 400 million boe
…… upside from technology development
First oil in March 2010
Industry first production in Lower Tertiary
Development drilling planned for 5+ years
New world record deepest drilling and production
system
4.85 KM
km
Seismic overview of Great White
7 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
8. BRAZIL GROWTH POTENTIAL
SHELL BRAZIL PRODUCTION
OVERVIEW SHELL POSITIONS
Espirito
Santo
Basin
Sao Francisco
exploration
Parque das Conchas BC-10
• Start-up phase -1 2009
• Phase 2 FID 2010
Bijupira-
Gato do Mato BMS-54 Salema Campos
discovery Basin
• multi-well drilling BC-10 FPSO
program in 2011&’12
Stena Drillmax – Gato do Mato well
Santos
Divested BMS-8 Basin
UPSTREAM PRODUCTION
UPSTREAM POTENTIAL
2011-12 KEY WELLS
8 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
9. GOM: PERMITTING STILL A CHALLENGE
PLANS SUBMITTED REQUIRING EAS AND NEW APDS - BY PLAN
Days
450
400 Plans: Operator submission to "Deemed Submitted" Plans: "Deemed Submitted" to Final Action (Approval)
Plan Approved to First APD Total time for Plan Approval, 5 Plan Trend
350
May June July August September
30 51 51
300 47
33
60 51 29
250 30 31
52 5 29 29 58 65
24 55
21 43
46 41 31
200 28
46 30 31 54
40 28 29
46 16
5
13 30
150 9
47 1 35 42 48 300
288 288
25 33 21 76 273
73
52 28 232 231 238 248
213 219 219 24 34
100 192 203
191 199 182 187 190 176
204 203 204
35
170 171 50 74 173 173
17 158
146
122 133 126 126
119 121 27 107
50 92 98 100 92
73 76
62 51
43
0
Permitting averaging >150 days; 50 pre-Macondo
DEEPWATER PLANS WITH EA., APDS TARGETING HYDROCARBONS ONLY,
9 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
10. SAFE AND RELIABLE OPERATIONS
SAFETY CASE ‘BOW TIE’ MODEL:
OUR APPROACH PREVENTION AND RECOVERY – INDUSTRY
Global Standards
Multiple Barriers
CONSEQUENCES
Well Design
HAZARD
Training
Control Response &
Incident
Remote Monitoring & Barriers Recovery
Safety Case Approach
Minimize Mitigate
Leadership & Safety Culture
Likelihood Consequences
PREVENTATIVE BARRIERS MINIMIZE LIKELIHOOD OF AN INCIDENT
Competent Safety Case Minimum
Technical Equipment Human Zero process
+ staff & + + management + two tested & + =
standards & testing & behaviours safety
contractors; of major independent
procedures certification & culture incidents
rigorous drills hazards barriers
10 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
11. BLOWOUT PREVENTION & CONTAINMENT CAPABILITY
STANDARD ASSET INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE
Founding & permanent Board Member of the 9 participating members, Shell operator
Marine Well Containment Company (MWCC) Near term the project team will:
MWCC will own & deploy the system in US GOM • Design a capping toolbox & additional
Subsea containment equipment designed for GOM hardware for the subsea injection of dispersant
• Interim system was available Feb 2011 • Further assess the need for and feasibility of a
• Expanded system available 2012 containment system for shared use
• Assess deployment options
11 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
12. ALASKA – CHUKCHI & BEAUFORT SEA
Chukchi Sea Preparing for two rig, 2012 drilling program
• up to three Chukchi wells, including Burger
Beaufort Sea
appraisal; up to two Beaufort wells
Current focus on operational readiness and
0 100
SHELL LEASEHOLD securing necessary permits
CHUKCHI Crackerjack Klondike Burger
X-SECTION 1991 1989 1990
Successful leasing in 2005-2008
• #1 Alaska position, 2.4 mln acres
Proven petroleum province
• well understood North Slope geology
Multi-billion boe potential in existing Chukchi
& Beaufort Sea discoveries
12 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011
13. ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC
Q&A
HOUSTON/SHREVEPORT
NOVEMBER 2011
13 Copyright of Royal Dutch Shell plc 29 November 2011