Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Webinar: State Innovation Models Initiative for State Officials - Model Design

•
•
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

In this August 14, 2012 webinar CMS Innovation Center staff provided additional information for states that are interested in applying for a Model Design award. Governors' offices were strongly encouraged to onvite their health care innovation team, key stakeholders and appropriate State officials such as State health department directors, Medicaid directors, and insurance commissioners. - - - CMS Innovations http://innovations.cms.gov We accept comments in the spirit of our comment policy: http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/comment_policy.html CMS Privacy Policy http://cms.gov/About-CMS/Agency-Information/Aboutwebsite/Privacy-Policy.html

Related slideshows

Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2014 Sta...
Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2014 Sta...Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2014 Sta...
Open Door Forums: ACO Investment Model Question & Answer Session for 2014 Sta...
 
Webinar: State Innovation Models Initiative - Overview for State Officials
Webinar: State Innovation Models Initiative - Overview for State OfficialsWebinar: State Innovation Models Initiative - Overview for State Officials
Webinar: State Innovation Models Initiative - Overview for State Officials
 
Open Door Forum: Next Generation ACO Model - First Open Door Forum
Open Door Forum: Next Generation ACO Model - First Open Door ForumOpen Door Forum: Next Generation ACO Model - First Open Door Forum
Open Door Forum: Next Generation ACO Model - First Open Door Forum
 
1 of 24
Download to read offline
State Innovation Models Initiative: Model Design Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services August 14, 2012 Webinar
Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 2
State Innovation Models: Theory of Action Hypothesis to be tested: New service delivery and payment models will be more effective and produce better outcomes when they are implemented as part of a broad-based, Governor- led, statewide initiative that brings together multiple payers and stakeholders -- and uses the levers of state government to effect change States can be strong partners in transforming health care because they: • Pay for a large percentage of health care services • Have broad regulatory powers over health care providers and payers • Regulate public health, social service, and educational services • Can convene multiple parties • Are closer to the actual delivery of care • Can integrate state health information exchange infrastructure and capabilities to support accountable care 3
A reformed delivery system will support and reward those who improve the health of populations Coordinated Community Acute Health Care Seamless Health Integrated Health System Care System Care System High quality acute care • High quality acute care • High quality acute care • Accountable care systems Accountable care systems • Accountable care systems • Shared financial risk Shared financial risk • Shared financial risk • Case management and Case management and • Case management and preventive care systems preventive care systems preventive care systems • Population-based quality Population-based quality • Population-based quality and cost performance and cost performance and cost performance • Population-based health • Population-based health Population-based health outcomes outcomes outcomes • Care system integration • Care system integration Care system integration with community health with community health with community health resources resources resources 4
Definitions for Models Two Key Concepts Comprehensive approach to transforming the health system of a state. The State Health Care Innovation Plan includes the State Health Care state’s vision and strategies to transform its payment and Innovation Plan service delivery system that will improve the quality of care and lower costs through continuous improvement. Refers to specific delivery system designs, such as accountable Payment and care organizations, integrated care systems, or medical homes that Service delivery are supported by aligned payment methods that reward value. Model These models will be described in a State Health Care Innovation Plan. 5
How to Present a Compelling Proposal 1. Provide the case for State Health Care System Transformation – Establish a rationale for redesigning the delivery system and moving to a value- based payment system which incentivizes improved health outcomes – Include multiple payers in the model design planning effort 2. Provide evidence that the collaborative planning process will supported with state level performance data and information. – Describe how the planning effort will be supported by cost, quality, population data collection and health system performance information – Describe the specific data resources that are going available to support the model design work 3. Present the state’s strategy for engaging the key stakeholders – Describe the strategies or approach that will be used to engage various stakeholders – Present how the state will achieve provider, payer, and other stakeholder buy-in for the State Health Innovation Plan 6
Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 7
The purpose of the State Health Care Innovation Plan is to… • Align all of the stakeholders around a common approach and set of model designs • Provide the framework for bringing all of the state’s resources -health care and public health programs, health insurance coverage, social, educational, and community based services -- into the delivery system re- design process • Include specific multi-payer models that the state proposes to test • Engage communities and citizens in improving the state’s health system 8
Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 9
Required components of Model Design application • State Health Care Innovation Plan – Provide a Vision Statement for health system transformation – Describe population demographic including Medicaid and CHIP populations – Describe population health status and issues or barriers • Health System Design and Performance Goals – Describe cost, quality and population health performance targets – Set goals for improving care, population health and reducing health care cost – Describe proposed payment and service delivery models • Roadmap for Health System Transformation – Provide a timeline for transformation – Review milestones and opportunities – Describe policy, regulatory and legislative changes necessary to achieve the state’s vision transformation – Describe any waiver or state plan amendment requirements and their timing 10
Model Design Proposal Requirements States must consider levers and strategies in developing their State Health Care Innovation Plans and new models, such as: • Creating multi-payer strategies to move away from payment based on volume and toward payment based on outcomes • Developing innovative approaches to improve the effectiveness, efficiency and appropriate mix of the health care work force • Aligning state regulatory authorities to reinforce accountable care and delivery system transformation or developing alternative approaches to certificate of need programs 11
Model Design Proposal Requirements Examples of additional levers and strategies States must consider in developing their State Health Care Innovation Plans and new models: • Creating opportunities to align regulations and requirements for health insurers with the broader goals of multi-payer delivery system and payment reform; • Coordinating State-based Affordable Insurance Exchange activities with broader health system transformation efforts; • Integrating the financing and delivery of public health services and community prevention strategies with health system redesign models; • Leveraging community stabilization development initiatives in low income communities and encouraging community investment to improve community health. 12
Model Design Application Requirements All state applicants for Model Design awards must submit the following: • Standard forms • Provider Engagement • Letter of Endorsement from the • Project plan and timeline Governor • Budget narrative and itemized • Project abstract expenditure plan • Model design strategy • Financial Analysis demonstrating net savings • Description of stakeholder engagement • Letters of support and participation from major • Evidence of public and private stakeholders payer participation • Project organization information 13
Model Pre-Test Award is not the same as Model Design Criteria for Pre-Test Award: • States applying for Model Testing awards may receive pre-testing assistance ranging from $1-3 million if they do not qualify for a full Model Testing award in the round one • The eligibility standards, deliverables and other requirements for pre-testing assistance awards are based on the review of the state’s Model Testing application • States awarded a cooperative agreement for a pre-test award must resubmit their improved proposal as part of round two model testing 14
Model Design Scoring Model Design Strategy 30 points Plan for provider Engagement 15 points Evidence of Engagement 15 points Organizational Capacity 10 points Budget & Financial Analysis 30 points Total 100 points 15
Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 16
Examples of Allowable Model Design Costs Allowable costs associated with state Model Design work: • State staff costs to engage in model design • Staff participation and travel to relevant learning collaboratives and workshops and other relevant learning and diffusion opportunities • Investments in State data collection and analysis capacity and cost and utilization pattern analysis • Consumer and provider engagement and focus group costs • Actuarial modeling • Performance measure development and evidence-based improvement research • Business process analysis and requirement system analysis 17
Examples of Allowable Model Design Costs Additional allowable costs associated with state Model Design work: • Policy, legal, and regulatory research to address legislative and legal frameworks for models • Planning and convening for creating a statewide all–payer data-base • Planning work relating to public health programs including the state’s Healthy People 2020 plan, and meeting goals for the National Quality Strategy and/or National Prevention Strategy • Model Design costs, including: – Model scope development – Theory of action development – Target population research – Setting performance targets – Financial analysis and analysis of health care trend impacts – Budget planning – Travel to SIM workshop and conferences 18
Prohibited Uses of Cooperative Agreement Funds States may not use funds: • To match any other federal funds • To provide services, equipment, or support that are the legal responsibility of another party under federal or state law • To supplant existing federal state, local, or private funding of infrastructure or services • To satisfy state matching requirements • To pay for the use of specific components, devices, equipment, or personnel that are not integrated into the entire service delivery and payment model proposal • To lobby or advocate for changes in federal or state law 19
Model Design Evaluation • The Innovation Center will assess the ability of the Model Design states to engage stakeholders and develop a State health Care Innovation Plan • Each Model Design state will be evaluated through a series of case studies using qualitative methods (interviews with grantees and CMS staff and site visits) • CMS has the ultimate responsibility for the evaluation process and reports • The Innovation Center’s contractor will be able to assist states with evaluation-related technical assistance in developing a State health Care Innovation Plan 20
Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 21
Model Design Award Timeline Applications Period of due: Anticipated performance: Announcement : September 17, award date: From award date July 19, 2012 2012, November 2012 through 5 p.m. EDT May 14, 2013 22
Additional Information • Additional webinars will be scheduled for state policy makers to cover the following topics: – 8/15 Model Testing – TBD Application submission guidance – TBD Financial Templates and Medicare data resources • Submit questions to stateinnovations@cms.hhs.gov (Note: States may wish to create a similar in-box for your stakeholders) • FAQ will be updated and posted to the Innovation Center website at innovation.cms.gov • Additional information is available on our website: innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/state-innovations 23
Questions ??? 24

More Related Content

Webinar: State Innovation Models Initiative for State Officials - Model Design

  • 1. State Innovation Models Initiative: Model Design Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services August 14, 2012 Webinar
  • 2. Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 2
  • 3. State Innovation Models: Theory of Action Hypothesis to be tested: New service delivery and payment models will be more effective and produce better outcomes when they are implemented as part of a broad-based, Governor- led, statewide initiative that brings together multiple payers and stakeholders -- and uses the levers of state government to effect change States can be strong partners in transforming health care because they: • Pay for a large percentage of health care services • Have broad regulatory powers over health care providers and payers • Regulate public health, social service, and educational services • Can convene multiple parties • Are closer to the actual delivery of care • Can integrate state health information exchange infrastructure and capabilities to support accountable care 3
  • 4. A reformed delivery system will support and reward those who improve the health of populations Coordinated Community Acute Health Care Seamless Health Integrated Health System Care System Care System High quality acute care • High quality acute care • High quality acute care • Accountable care systems Accountable care systems • Accountable care systems • Shared financial risk Shared financial risk • Shared financial risk • Case management and Case management and • Case management and preventive care systems preventive care systems preventive care systems • Population-based quality Population-based quality • Population-based quality and cost performance and cost performance and cost performance • Population-based health • Population-based health Population-based health outcomes outcomes outcomes • Care system integration • Care system integration Care system integration with community health with community health with community health resources resources resources 4
  • 5. Definitions for Models Two Key Concepts Comprehensive approach to transforming the health system of a state. The State Health Care Innovation Plan includes the State Health Care state’s vision and strategies to transform its payment and Innovation Plan service delivery system that will improve the quality of care and lower costs through continuous improvement. Refers to specific delivery system designs, such as accountable Payment and care organizations, integrated care systems, or medical homes that Service delivery are supported by aligned payment methods that reward value. Model These models will be described in a State Health Care Innovation Plan. 5
  • 6. How to Present a Compelling Proposal 1. Provide the case for State Health Care System Transformation – Establish a rationale for redesigning the delivery system and moving to a value- based payment system which incentivizes improved health outcomes – Include multiple payers in the model design planning effort 2. Provide evidence that the collaborative planning process will supported with state level performance data and information. – Describe how the planning effort will be supported by cost, quality, population data collection and health system performance information – Describe the specific data resources that are going available to support the model design work 3. Present the state’s strategy for engaging the key stakeholders – Describe the strategies or approach that will be used to engage various stakeholders – Present how the state will achieve provider, payer, and other stakeholder buy-in for the State Health Innovation Plan 6
  • 7. Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 7
  • 8. The purpose of the State Health Care Innovation Plan is to… • Align all of the stakeholders around a common approach and set of model designs • Provide the framework for bringing all of the state’s resources -health care and public health programs, health insurance coverage, social, educational, and community based services -- into the delivery system re- design process • Include specific multi-payer models that the state proposes to test • Engage communities and citizens in improving the state’s health system 8
  • 9. Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 9
  • 10. Required components of Model Design application • State Health Care Innovation Plan – Provide a Vision Statement for health system transformation – Describe population demographic including Medicaid and CHIP populations – Describe population health status and issues or barriers • Health System Design and Performance Goals – Describe cost, quality and population health performance targets – Set goals for improving care, population health and reducing health care cost – Describe proposed payment and service delivery models • Roadmap for Health System Transformation – Provide a timeline for transformation – Review milestones and opportunities – Describe policy, regulatory and legislative changes necessary to achieve the state’s vision transformation – Describe any waiver or state plan amendment requirements and their timing 10
  • 11. Model Design Proposal Requirements States must consider levers and strategies in developing their State Health Care Innovation Plans and new models, such as: • Creating multi-payer strategies to move away from payment based on volume and toward payment based on outcomes • Developing innovative approaches to improve the effectiveness, efficiency and appropriate mix of the health care work force • Aligning state regulatory authorities to reinforce accountable care and delivery system transformation or developing alternative approaches to certificate of need programs 11
  • 12. Model Design Proposal Requirements Examples of additional levers and strategies States must consider in developing their State Health Care Innovation Plans and new models: • Creating opportunities to align regulations and requirements for health insurers with the broader goals of multi-payer delivery system and payment reform; • Coordinating State-based Affordable Insurance Exchange activities with broader health system transformation efforts; • Integrating the financing and delivery of public health services and community prevention strategies with health system redesign models; • Leveraging community stabilization development initiatives in low income communities and encouraging community investment to improve community health. 12
  • 13. Model Design Application Requirements All state applicants for Model Design awards must submit the following: • Standard forms • Provider Engagement • Letter of Endorsement from the • Project plan and timeline Governor • Budget narrative and itemized • Project abstract expenditure plan • Model design strategy • Financial Analysis demonstrating net savings • Description of stakeholder engagement • Letters of support and participation from major • Evidence of public and private stakeholders payer participation • Project organization information 13
  • 14. Model Pre-Test Award is not the same as Model Design Criteria for Pre-Test Award: • States applying for Model Testing awards may receive pre-testing assistance ranging from $1-3 million if they do not qualify for a full Model Testing award in the round one • The eligibility standards, deliverables and other requirements for pre-testing assistance awards are based on the review of the state’s Model Testing application • States awarded a cooperative agreement for a pre-test award must resubmit their improved proposal as part of round two model testing 14
  • 15. Model Design Scoring Model Design Strategy 30 points Plan for provider Engagement 15 points Evidence of Engagement 15 points Organizational Capacity 10 points Budget & Financial Analysis 30 points Total 100 points 15
  • 16. Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 16
  • 17. Examples of Allowable Model Design Costs Allowable costs associated with state Model Design work: • State staff costs to engage in model design • Staff participation and travel to relevant learning collaboratives and workshops and other relevant learning and diffusion opportunities • Investments in State data collection and analysis capacity and cost and utilization pattern analysis • Consumer and provider engagement and focus group costs • Actuarial modeling • Performance measure development and evidence-based improvement research • Business process analysis and requirement system analysis 17
  • 18. Examples of Allowable Model Design Costs Additional allowable costs associated with state Model Design work: • Policy, legal, and regulatory research to address legislative and legal frameworks for models • Planning and convening for creating a statewide all–payer data-base • Planning work relating to public health programs including the state’s Healthy People 2020 plan, and meeting goals for the National Quality Strategy and/or National Prevention Strategy • Model Design costs, including: – Model scope development – Theory of action development – Target population research – Setting performance targets – Financial analysis and analysis of health care trend impacts – Budget planning – Travel to SIM workshop and conferences 18
  • 19. Prohibited Uses of Cooperative Agreement Funds States may not use funds: • To match any other federal funds • To provide services, equipment, or support that are the legal responsibility of another party under federal or state law • To supplant existing federal state, local, or private funding of infrastructure or services • To satisfy state matching requirements • To pay for the use of specific components, devices, equipment, or personnel that are not integrated into the entire service delivery and payment model proposal • To lobby or advocate for changes in federal or state law 19
  • 20. Model Design Evaluation • The Innovation Center will assess the ability of the Model Design states to engage stakeholders and develop a State health Care Innovation Plan • Each Model Design state will be evaluated through a series of case studies using qualitative methods (interviews with grantees and CMS staff and site visits) • CMS has the ultimate responsibility for the evaluation process and reports • The Innovation Center’s contractor will be able to assist states with evaluation-related technical assistance in developing a State health Care Innovation Plan 20
  • 21. Agenda Background & Goals for Preparing for the Proposal The State Health Care Innovation Plan The Application Package and Scoring Funding & Evaluation Timeline and Contacts 21
  • 22. Model Design Award Timeline Applications Period of due: Anticipated performance: Announcement : September 17, award date: From award date July 19, 2012 2012, November 2012 through 5 p.m. EDT May 14, 2013 22
  • 23. Additional Information • Additional webinars will be scheduled for state policy makers to cover the following topics: – 8/15 Model Testing – TBD Application submission guidance – TBD Financial Templates and Medicare data resources • Submit questions to stateinnovations@cms.hhs.gov (Note: States may wish to create a similar in-box for your stakeholders) • FAQ will be updated and posted to the Innovation Center website at innovation.cms.gov • Additional information is available on our website: innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/state-innovations 23