The ten commandments

THE TEN COMMANDMENTS
By Pastor Glenn Pease
CONTENTS
1. FOUNDATIONS FOR FREEDOM
2. THE LAW AND THE CHRISTIAN
3. THE FIRST COMMANDMENT
4. CONCENTRATION COMMANDED
5. RELAXATION COMMANDED
6. IMAGINATION COMMANDED
7. SANCTIFICATION COMMANDED
8. PRESERVATION OF MARRIAGE COMMANDED
9. PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY COMMANDED
10. PRESERVATION OF TRUTH COMMANDED
11. LAST BUT NOT LEAST
1. FOUNDATIONS FOR FREEDOM
The editor of a newspaper was interviewing a man who
applied for the job of being a rewrite man. "Are you good at
condensing"? the editor asked. "Sure", was the snap reply.
"All right then, take this and cut it short", he said , as he
handed him a copy of the ten commandments. The applicant
was momentarily startled, but then he took his pencil, wrote
briefly, and handed it back. The editor looked at it and said,
"Your hired!" He had written one word--don't.
This story illustrates the popular misconception about the
ten commandments. They are seen as negative, and can be

summed up in the philosophy that says thou shalt not enjoy
life. Whatever you like, don't do it. Now it is true that 8 of
the 10 are negative, but as we shall see, this is for a very
practical reason. Jesus summed them up, not with a don't,
but with a twofold positive do. Do love God with all your
heart, and do love your neighbor as yourself. The first four
commandments deal with loving God, and the last six deal
with loving our neighbor.
But if these most famous laws in the world can be stated
positively, why were they given in a negative form
originally? Those who do not care to look for an answer just
dismiss them as being irrelevant for a positive thinking
world. They claim the negative nature of them leads to
excessive negativism. This is illustrated by the mother who
said "Go see what Johnny is doing and tell him to stop."
One little boy under this kind of atmosphere thought his
name was Johnny don't. There have been many Christians
who have measured their piety by the number of things they
don't do. The Pharisees were experts at this sort of thing
also, and they were able to compile a list of several thousand
things they did not do. It was a negative religion.
Too many negatives lead to a life of emptiness. The
absence of evil is a good thing, but when good is also absent,
one is not living a life pleasing to God. Jesus told of the man
who had all of the demons that possessed him driven out,
and all was swept clean. All the evil was gone, but no positive
good filled the vacuum, and the result was the evil returned
in greater power than it had before. Those who try to live on

negatives often take great falls into sin, for negatives are just
not a good foundation. The negative is only of value when it
is a means to a positive end.
A missionary in Africa was trying to explain the Ten
Commandments to an old native chief. "You tell me I'm not
to take my neighbors wife?" "That's right" said the
missionary. "Or his ivory or his oxen?" "Quite right!"
"And I must not ambush him on the trail and kill him?"
"Absolutely right" said the missionary. "But I cannot do
any of these things," said the savage, "I am too old. To be
old and to be Christian are the same thing." This illustrates
how weak a mere negative religion and morality would be.
Righteousness would be equivalent to inability. If negative
become ends in themselves, then one becomes more and
more Christian the less he is able to live, and death would
bring perfection. This is, of course, nonsense. Negatives
cannot be ends in themselves, but must be means to a
positive goal.
We fail when we lose the positive, for it is the positive that
gives authority to the negative commands. People demand
to see the positive value in having their freedom limited by
prohibitions. If you say don't, they want to know why, and
the why had better be positive if you expect people to respect
the authority of the negative. Robert Kahn, a Jewish Rabbi,
points out that the Declaration of Independence has this
great positive statement-"All men are created equal and are
endowed by their Creator with rights to life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness." Then, in order to preserve these

positive values, a Bill of Rights was a appended to the
Constitution. When you read them you notice they are of a
negative character. The gist of each is-
Congress shall make no law
The right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed
No soldier shall be quartered
the right--to be secure shall not be violated
No person shall be held to answer.
No fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined
Excessive bail shall not be required
The enumeration of certain rights shall not be Construed
These are the eight negatives of the ten amendments called
the Bill of Rights. They are negative commandments for the
preservation of positive rights. We see from this, that when
negatives are the means to positive ends, they do not destroy
our freedom, but become foundations for freedom. Without
these negatives to protect us we would be far less free as
Americans.
Now if we go back to the Ten Commandments, we see the
same principle involved. It is almost as if the Constitution
and Bill of Rights were patterned after the 20th chapter of
Exodus. In Exodus 20:2, we see the positive statement of
God, which gives authority to His Commandments, and
which is the basis for their existence. "I am the Lord your
God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the
house of bondage." God did not impose this list of laws
upon a people to suppress them and their liberty. They were

the gift of a wise God to a people He had set free, and who
He wanted to remain free.
John Locke said of the law, "The end of the law is not to
abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom."
This was certainly God's intention in giving the Ten
Commandments. If oppression and suppression was His
motive, He could have done no better than to have left them
in their bondage in Egypt. The whole atmosphere
surrounding the Ten Commandments is one of positive
liberty. Liberty so new and fresh and complete that it could
only lead to chaos and disaster without the limitations of
law. All of the negatives are like the Bill of Rights negatives.
They are to preserve the great liberty which God had given
them.
By forbidding murder, for example, all are free to live.
By forbidding stealing all are free to possess property
without fear. Each negative is for the protection of a
positive value. Freedom is dependant upon the limiting and
the guiding of man by law. Total freedom is a paradox, for
it leads to total bondage. Total freedom is when every man
does what is right in his own eyes, and has no responsibility
for the rights of others. It is absolute individualism, which is
anarchy.
During the French Revolution they took the not out of the
Ten Commandments, and they put it into the creed. They
had, thou shalt kill, steal, commit adultery, lie; and I do not
believe in God the Father Almighty. The results of this

misplaced not was one of the worst periods of history. The
anarchy and blood bath, that came because of the absence of
this not, was a classic example of the positive value of
negative limitations. Remove the negative and you destroy
the power of the positive. This is true in many realms of life.
If you take the negative cable off your battery the positive
cable will not start your car. The two must work together to
achieve a positive goal. That is why negative laws are also
needed to achieve positive goals in human society.
When the Ten Commandments are seen in the proper
perspective they become foundations for freedom, and not
hindrances to freedom. They hinder and restrain only that
perverted freedom which leads to bondage. If there is a
world where all goes well without respect for life, property,
and purity, it has not yet been discovered, and until some
space traveler charts it on the map of the universe, the Ten
Commandments will be relevant and essential to the good
life and best society.
Cecil B. DeMille, in preparing the script for his well
known production of the Ten Commandments, caught
something of the meaning of God's eternal Word when he
said, "Our modern world defines God as a "religious
complex" and laughed at the Ten Commandments as old
fashioned. Then, though the laughter, came the shattering
thunder of great world wars, each more terrible than the last
and a blood-drenched world, no longer laughing, cries for a
way out. There is only one way out. It existed before it was
Engraved upon the tables of stone. It will exist when

stone has crumbled. The Ten Commandments are not rules
to obey as a personal favor to God. They are the
fundamental principles without which mankind cannot live
together. Armies are mighty, atom bombs are mighty.
Ideologies born of blind pride and passion are mighty. But
the truth of God is mightier than all, and it shall prevail."
Remove the laws that limit the earth to its orbit around
the sun, and you gain a liberty which would hurl it into
extinction. We are only free to live and breathe as we do,
because of the limitations of law. So it is with the Ten
Commandments. The New Testament does not repeal them,
but rather, lifts them to an even higher level by summing
them all up in love. Paul in Gal. 5:13-15, gives us a perfect
example of the necessity of the law being fulfilled in love.
"You, my brothers, were called to be free. But do not use
your freedom to indulge the sinful nature; rather, serve one
another in love. The entire law is summed up in a single
command: "Love your neighbor as yourself." If you keep
on biting and devouring each other, watch out or you will be
destroyed by each other." This shows us that the Ten
Commandments are as essential for the survival of the
Christian Church as they were for the survival of Israel. The
only difference is, the New Israel stresses the positive aspect
of love in the fulfilling of them.
When they were given to Israel, they were given to a very
immature and undisciplined people. They had been slaves
for hundreds of years, and were not an advanced and highly
civilized people. Negatives are necessary on this level of

development. We see this in raising children. When they
are young and immature, and do not understand ideals and
positive values, you are limited to saying "no, no" to guide
them. The positive replaces the negative only as they
become mature. This is the pattern we see in God's dealing
with men. The Old Testament has a focus on the "no, no",
but the New Testament focus is on the "yes, yes." The more
mature people become in their relationship to God the more
valuable and precious the commandments become. An
unknown poet put it-
"The truth that yesterday was mine is larger truth today;
It's face has aspects more divine, it's kinship fuller sway
For truth must grow as ages roll, and God looms large upon
the soul."
When we see the Ten Commandments from the true
Biblical perspective, we see them as gifts of grace. They
came from God who first delivered Israel, and then gave the
law to preserve that liberty He gave them. The origin of the
law is God's love. The goal of it is that we might love Him
who first loved us, and our neighbor whom He also loved.
As given to Israel, however, they were exclusive and not
universal, for God had delivered and redeemed only Israel.
The Ten Commandments as given in Exodus were only for
Israel, but since the coming of Christ they are universal, and
all men are obligated by them, especially those who believe.
Jesus died for the sins of all men. He became the universal
Savior, and now all men can be led out of bondage to sin and
Satan by faith in Him. This becomes the New Testament

basis for obedience to the Ten Commandments. All who
have been delivered are obligated to express their gratitude
by obeying the laws of their Deliverer.
Laws become the foundation for freedom. Obedience to
God's laws is our expression of love to Him who first loved
us and set us free. Love and law are partners in the
Christian life, and they work together for the good of man.
As we study the Ten Commandments, we must be aware
that we not just studying what was relevant to ancient Israel,
but what is relevant to our daily life. What is old is not
obsolete just by being old. The laws of nature are very old,
but I never heard of a movement to stop keeping them. I
never heard any parents say, "my folks always told me not to
touch a hot stove, but that is old fashioned. I let my kids
touch the hot stove, and don't push any of that old stuff on
them." The reason some things are old is because they are
essential for all generations. The law of gravity is as old as
time, but just as fresh and new and vital to life as it was on
the first day of time. The Ten Commandments are old, but
they will never be outdated. Break them today, and it is just
as foolish as trying to break the law of gravity today. D. L.
Moody said, "The commandments of God given to Moses in
the mount at Horeb are as binding today as ever they have
been since the time when they were proclaimed in the
hearing of the people."
We are saved by faith alone in Jesus Christ, but saved
people must still obey the laws of nature and the laws of
God. Law does not save, but there is no way to live a life

pleasing to God, and one that leads to happiness, apart from
obedience to law. The very angels of God, who never sinned,
live in obedience to God's law. In Psalm 103:20 we read,
"Bless the Lord ye His angels that excel in strength, that do
His commandments, harkening unto the voice of His Word."
The Christian sees the Old Testament law as a means of
fulfilling the New Testament law of Christ, which is the law
of love. It is not a way of being saved, but a way by which
we express our love to God for being saved by grace. Our
freedom in Christ, limited by our obedience to the Ten
Commandments, will lead us to live a life worthy of our
Lord. The greatest freedom in life is the freedom to please
God. Thus, in studying the Ten Commandments, we are
studying the Foundations For Freedom.
2. THE LAW AND THE CHRISTIAN
An angry group of citizens shouted at their small town
mayor-"Every city car that passes through here breaks the
law by breaking the speed limit. You've got to do something
about it, and do it fast." "Don't you worry," said the mayor
with confidence. "I'll raise the speed limit to 150. Let's see
them beat that!"
This mayor had an easy solution, which would effectively

element lawlessness. All you have to do is change the law, or
redefine lawlessness. You can just change the definition of
lawlessness and get rid of it. This is a process that goes on all
the time in our culture. What was once a bad thing is no
longer a bad thing because it has been defined as no longer
bad, but acceptable. Relativity is real, but when it enters into
the realm of morality it becomes very dangerous. Men use it
to change what is evil in God's eyes into what is acceptable
to men. Or, on the other hand, they change what was once a
virtue into a vice. For example, the young girl who brought
her Bible to school was sent home, as if it were a crime.
It is no wonder that there is confusion about the law, for
it is no longer stable as it once was. It is full of loopholes, so
that not all are treated equal, and it can be changed any day,
so that what was wrong yesterday can be right tomorrow.
The average American is skeptical about the law, for he
knows it is often just an arbitrary will of the majority
imposed on the minority. Much of the lawlessness of our day
is due to the laws protection of injustice. The law can protect
and defend evil as well as good. It can be an instrument of
oppression and slavery, as well as a force for freedom. Every
dictator and tyrant controls his people through law. Abuse
of the law is as common as its legitimate use.
Even in the church the law of God was abused. The
Puritans in Salem, for example, were determined to legislate
the Kingdom of God into reality, and they were going to
make the New Jerusalem on earth. These were some of the
Sabbath laws they made-

No one shall run on the Sabbath or walk in his garden.
No one shall make beds, cut hair, or shave.
No woman shall kiss her child on the Sabbath.
No food or lodging shall be given to any Quaker or other
heretic.
And they were not just kidding either. Disobedience was not
tolerated, but met with heavy penalties.
Roger Williams, one of the heroes of freedom, was a
minister in Salem. He objected to the use of law in regulating
matters of conscience. He said this is contrary to the doctrine
of Jesus Christ. This was an attack on their system of law,
and they pronounced the sentence of banishment on him, for
the audacity to question their law. He was able to escape and
by the help of friendly Indians get to what became known as
Rhode Island. It was there that Roger Williams established
the first place on earth with total religious liberty. He also
established the first Baptist church in America there.
He became a hero of freedom, and he is studied in all the
secular history books. Yet, he became this hero by being
lawless. He rebelled against the laws he felt were unjust both
in the church and the state. He started the long hard battle
to get the laws of the state and the church to leave men free
in the realm of their religious beliefs. You cannot make
believers by means of the law. This is a personal act of choice
and faith, and not a matter you can legislate. Many
Christians through the centuries have ended up in prison,
just like Peter in the New Testament, because they refused to

obey laws that interfered with their obedience to God. They
were seen as lawless, but in reality they were being loyal to
the highest law, the law of God.
Christians have recognized what observant men of all
ages have noticed, and that is, that law that is a respecter of
persons is an instrument of evil, whereas, law that treats all
men equally is an instrument for justice. Benjamin Franklin
said, "Laws like to cobwebs, catch small flies, Great ones
break them before your eyes." An 18th century saying of
similar thought goes like this-
"The law doth punish man or woman
That steals the goose from off the common,
But let's the greater felon loose
That steals the common from the goose."
In other words, there is a duel standard in which the weak
and poor must suffer the full penalty of the law, but the rich
and powerful can escape it and even become heroes in doing
so. Pope said, "All look up with reverential awe, At crimes
that 'scape, or triumph o'er the law."
The Christian must respond when asked about his view of
the law, that it is a realm where every situation must be
evaluated by itself. If the law is just and consistent with the
absolute law of God's revelation, the Christian is bound to
defend it. If the law is unjust and is itself a violation of the
law of God, the Christian is equally bound to be lawless, and
defy that law for the sake of freedom and loyalty to God.

The heroes of freedom in church and state have been those
who defied unjust laws.
All of this means that there is nothing more relevant to
our day than a depth knowledge of God's law. It becomes
the absolute guide and standard by which the Christian
must decide where to stand to be a true defender of freedom.
We dare not decide on the basis of the world's standard, for
it is completely relative to the values of the world. The
Christian is not lawful or lawless by his relationship to any
of man's standards, but by his relationship to God's
standards, which are summarized in the Ten
Commandments. You might be thought of as a perfectly law
abiding American citizen, and yet be a lawless rebel in
relationship to the law of God. You may never murder or
steal, but be filled with hate and covetousness, which the law
of God forbids. On the other hand, you may end up in
prison because you do not obey the law of the land that
demands prejudice and hate.
Lawful and lawless are terms that must be seen in
relationship to the revealed Word of God to have any
significance for the Christian. The Church has always
recognized this and that is why Orthodoxy has never even
suggested that the New Testament has eliminated the Ten
Commandments. They are still vital guides for the Christian
life.
Luther said, "He who destroys the doctrine of the law
destroys at the same time political and social order...."

Calvin wrote, "We must not imagine that the coming of
Christ has freed us from the authority of the law; for it is the
eternal rule of a devout and holy life, and must, therefore, be
as unchangeable as the justice of God." John Wesley wrote,
" The moral law, contained in the Ten Commandments and
enforced by the Prophets, he (Christ) did not take away. It
was not the design of his coming to revoke any part of
this...The moral law stands on an entirely different
foundation from the ceremonial and ritual law... Every part
of this law must remain in force upon all mankind, and in all
ages."
These convictions have been stated by the great Christian
leaders of this century as well. Spurgeon said, "First, the law
of God must be perpetual. There is no abrogation of it, nor
amendment of it. It is not to be toned down or adjusted to
our fallen condition; but every one of the Lord's righteous
judgements abideth forever." And D. L. Moody said, "Jesus
never condemned the law and the prophets, but He did
condemn those who did not obey them. Because He gave
new commandments it does not follow that He abolished the
old. Christ's explanation of them made them all the more
searching."
These quotes from outstanding representatives of the
Christian Church make it clear that Orthodoxy has always
considered the Ten Commandments to be an absolute
revelation perpetually binding as long as earth shall last.
Those who criticize them as being old and obsolete for our
day fail to see their depth and perpetual relevance to all

ages. They say the old morality is stagnant like a puddle that
has set until it stinks. In Christian Reflections, C. S. Lewis
refutes this fallacy in a way worthy of being quoted, even
though it is a lengthy paragraph.
"Space does not stink because it has preserved its three
dimensions from the beginning. The square on the
hypotenuse has not gone moldy by continuing to equal the
sum of the squares on the other two sides. Love in not
dishonored by constancy, and when we wash our hands we
are seeking stagnation and putting the clock back, artificially
restoring our hands to the status quo in which they began
the day and resisting the natural trend of events which
would increase their dirtiness steadily from our birth to our
death. For the emotive term 'stagnant' let us substitute the
descriptive term 'permanent.' Does a permanent moral
standard preclude progress? On the contrary, except on the
supposition of a change-less standard, progress is impossible.
If good is a fixed point, it is at least possible that we should
get nearer and nearer to it; but if the terminus is as mobile
as the train, how can the train progress toward it? Our
ideas of the good may change, but they cannot change either
for the better or the worst if there is no absolute and
immutable good to which they can approximate or from
which they can recede. We can go on getting a sum more
and more nearly right only if the one perfectly right answer
is 'stagnant'"
This is the Christian attitude toward the law of God. It is
permanent, absolute, and it is the standard by which we test

the validity of all other laws. If they are unjust and are a
hindrance to man's legitimate freedom the Christian is to
oppose them as Jesus did the laws of the Pharisees. Law is
good and vital to man's happiness and welfare, but law is
only absolute when it is God's law. The Ten
Commandments are God's law for all men in all ages.
If an atheist says the Sea of Galilee is North of the Dead
Sea, it is just as true as if a Christian says it. If a thing is
true it makes no difference who says it. If an evil man says
two plus two equals four, it is not less true because he is evil.
A godly man cannot make it more true, for it is an objective
truth evident to all.
The Ten Commandments in some form are seen all over
the world in every culture. You can find laws from ancient
Egypt to modern India, which are just different versions of
the Ten Commandments. They are the universal top ten, for
they deal with issues that are relevant to all men. Civilized
men the world over, though fallen and lovers of sin, know
that there are some things that need to be forbidden to make
life tolerable.
The Mohammedans consider them just as sacred as do
the Jews and Christians. There is nothing on which so many
of the people of the world agree. They are no less true and
valuable when quoted by a pagan. They cannot save man,
but the fact is they help control man and his evil nature. It
is obedience to these top ten that keeps the world going.
Every culture that rises above the barbaric does so because

people are regulated by these laws. Millions of pagans have
a life with some degree of meaning and peace because they
live in the midst of neighbors who do not kill, steal, or
violate their mates.
The problem is, it is only the second half of the ten that
man obeys. The first half deals with God and loyalty to
Him. Here man is weak and this leads to humanism.
Humanism is faith in man without faith in God. It is the
result of a split in the Ten Commandments. Man has
developed a split-level world where he has cut himself off
from the top of the top ten. Until he gets the two halves of
these ten united he will be divided in his inner being and be
a civil war. Humanism fails, not because it is not full of what
is true, but because it deals with only half of reality and
leaves the greatest half out of the picture, which is God.
3. THE FIRST COMMANDMENT
EXODUS 20:1-3 And God spoke all these words: I am the
Lord your God, who brought you out of Egypt, out of the
land of slavery. You shall have no other gods before me.
In the book, The Doctor Of Crows Nest, and old doctor
Ferguson fell in love with the hands of young Barney Boyle.
"You must be a surgeon, Barney," he said. "You've got the

fingers and the nerves!" Barney was hesitant, but the
doctor pointed out all the advantages and the help he could
be to others. He concluded, "Ah, boy, God knows I'd give
my life to be a great surgeon. But He didn't give me the
fingers. I haven't the touch. But you have! You have the
nerve and the fingers and the mechanical ingenuity; you can
be a great surgeon. You shall have all my time and all my
books and all my money; I'll put you through! You must
think, dream, sleep, eat, drink bones and muscles and sinews
and nerves! Push everything else aside! He cried waving his
great hands excitedly. And remember!.... here his voice took
a solemn tone...let nothing share your heart with your
knife."
Here is an earthly example of the motivation behind the
first commandment. God had great ambitions for Israel. He
wanted a people who would be an instrument of His grace
and love to all the world. Though them He would bring into
the world the Great Physician, who alone would succeed as
an effective surgeon against sin. God had great plans, just
as the doctor did for young Barney, but both God and
doctor Ferguson had the same obstacle to overcome, and
that was the free will of man that can choose, not only less
than the best, but even the worst. Barney could choose to be
a bum and waste his gifts, and Israel could choose to go a
whoring after other gods and bring disgrace upon the name
of Jehovah. As a matter of fact, that is exactly what
happened, and it proves the point that free will is the basic
problem in the God-man relationship. Until the will is
submissive there is no way that man can be successful in

fulfilling the plan of God.
God must win our obedience to the first commandment
or the rest of them become meaningless. If we are not
absolutely loyal to Him and Him alone, we will not be
concerned about being loyal to His standard of morality. Dr.
Ferguson said "if you want to be a successful surgeon you
must let nothing share your heart with your knife." God is
saying in this first commandment, "if you want to be
successful in living a life pleasing to me, let nothing share
your heart with you love for me." In other words, make me
your first priority in all of life. All other loves, such as family,
friends, and neighbors must be subordinate to your love for
me. Love for God must be first and foremost, always.
Thoreau said, "Simplicity, simplicity, simplicity! I say,
let your affairs be as two or three, and not a hundred or a
thousand-simplify, simplify." God will not settle even for
two or three, however, but demands we simplify down to one
ultimate loyalty. This is what the first commandment is all
about. Let's look at the implication of this first
commandment.
The first implication of this commandment is that God
has made man free to defy His sovereignty. God does not
impose the benefits of His acts of grace upon man without
their consent. By shear power God brought Israel out of
Egypt, but He did not by shear power compel them to
acknowledge Him as their God. For their good He
commands that they do so, but the very existence of the

command implies that they have the freedom to do
otherwise. Tbey demonstrated their freedom time and time
again by defying this first commandment. The whole history
of the sufferings of Israel is the history of their disobedience
to the first commandment. Yet, God did not by shear force
ever compel them to obey it as he compelled the water of the
Red Sea to separate. Taking Israel out of Egypt was simple
compared to the task of taking Egypt out of Israel. The first
was a matter of power, but the second called for the
cooperation of man's will.
God's sovereignty does not play the same role in the
moral and spiritual realm as it does in the physical. He does
not force men into submission. The poet wrote-
And He that looketh wide and high,
Nor pauses in His plan,
Will take the sun out of the sky,
Ere freedom out of man.
In the very giving of the law God respects man's freedom,
but He gives them the law as another act of sovereign grace,
knowing that if they use their freedom to choose His will
they will find what is best in life for themselves. Israel will
become degraded, like all the surrounding nations, if she
does not freely choose to obey the law of God. When the
Jews chose not to follow the law they entered into the
bondage of fear and foolish superstition. They became
idolatrous and immoral, and only after the wrath of God
sent them into captivity did they finally learn how to use

their freedom to choose loyalty to God.
Freedom, which is man's greatest asset, is also his greatest
problem, until he learns to yield it up to God. Obedience to
the first commandment is not forced on us, but for those who
are looking for a shortcut to Gods best this is the
commandment to obey. We are free to be fools, but God
gave us the history of His people's response to this
commandment to help us avoid the folly of trying to find
happiness apart from obedience to it.
God honored man as the only creature on earth that has
the ability to choose to obey or defy His commandments.
God in His sovereignty has determined that He will not force
you to do His will, but He will require you to pay the price of
choosing wrong. The chemist can do as he pleases with his
chemicals, but if he does not respect the laws of chemistry he
may suddenly find himself leaving his lab by the way of the
roof. We are equally free to defy the moral laws of God, but
we are not free to escape the judgement that will result from
our bad choice. All of life revolves around the choices that
we make. We are not responsible for the outcome, but we
are responsible for the choices we make. Bonaro
Overstreet's oft-quoted words speak to this issue.
You say the little efforts that I make
Will do no good: They never will prevail
To tip the hovering scale
Where justice hangs in the balance.
I I don't think

I ever thought they would.
But I am prejudiced beyond debate
In favor of my right to choose which side
Shall feel the stubborn ounces of my weight.
The first commandment is God's calling to man to choose
Him and His will as the first priority in their lives. This
choice is the key to their own happiness.
The second implication we want to consider is that this
first commandment implies that there are other gods. That
sounds shocking when you hear it for the first time, but it
becomes a commonplace piece of information as you read
the commentaries. This first commandment clearly forbids
other gods being worshipped, but it does not state that there
are no other gods to be worshipped. It only states that for
Israel there is to be only one God. He was the only God, but
the existence of other gods is not denied. If there were no
other gods, what would be the point of forbidding anyone to
worship them?
When we consider the polytheism all around Israel, we
know the many gods who were worshipped were not
objectively real, but they were very definitely subjectively
real. They captured the loyalties of men, and did so with
Israel as well. In other words, non-existent gods are still very
real and God has to compete with them for man's loyalty. If
the false gods of the pagans were not a real threat to Israel's
right relationship to God, He never would have bothered to
make their exclusion a part of the first commandment.

God is actually the author of a gods are dead movement.
He seeks to get them excluded from the consciousness of His
people so that they die from neglect. God is all for any
movement that kills off and eliminates some of the millions of
false gods men have created. It sounds strange, but as
monotheists, who believe in only one God, we must
constantly be on guard against all kinds of real non-existent
gods. What is all amounts to is that there is only one capital
God, but a multitude of small gods which run all the way
from figments of the imagination to objectively existent
fallen creatures such as Satan, the god of this world.
The problem of non-existent gods hit the early church
and though Paul knew they did not exist, he also recognized
that some Christians believed in them because of their
former lives of idolatry. For the sake of these Christians the
stronger Christians were not to eat meat offered to a
non-existent god, because the god was real to the weaker
Christian. In other words, it is possible for a Christian to
believe in the actual reality of other gods. Paul says in I Cor.
8:4-7, "So then, about eating food sacrificed to idols: We
know that an idol is nothing at all in the world and that
there is no God but one. For even if there are so-called gods,
whether in heaven or on earth (as indeed there are many
"gods" and many "lords"), yet for us there is but one God,
the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we
live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom
all things came and through whom we live. But not
everyone knows this. Some people are still so accustomed to
idols that when they eat such food they think of it as having

been sacrificed to an idol, and since their conscience is weak,
it is defiled."
We see then, that both in the Old Testament and the New
Testament there is a process of education necessary to bring
men to the point of recognizing one, and only one, God. God
did not start by saying there are no other gods, but rather,
do not put other gods before me. If you are talking with
someone and they inquire about Allah and the gods of other
people, do not waste your time trying to disprove the
existence of these gods. Even as non-existent gods they have
great influence. Your primary task is to point them to the
God of revelation and urge them to put their trust in Him.
The issue is not whether there are other gods or not, but
whether or not they have surrendered to the God who has
provided their Savior in Jesus Christ.
The Bible does not try to prove God's existence, but urges
men to put their faith in Him and obey His revealed will.
Clovis Chappel says you could be out on the desert dying of
thirst and find evidence that water is somewhere nearby, but
the evidence will not save you without a drink of the actual
water. No one can live on proof of the existence of water.
They need to experience the life giving qualities of actual
water. So it is with God. Proofs of His existence are no
more satisfying than proofs of the existence of water. Men
must respond to God's revelation in faith to experience the
reality of God. Thomas Hardy sat in a church service and
felt so lonely because he had not responded in faith to the
God of the worshippers. He wrote-

Heart of mine knows not that ease
Which they know, since it be
That he who breathes "all's well" to these
Breathes no "all's well" to me.
God breathes His all's well only to those, who out of a
multitude of gods, and possible ultimate values, will choose
to put Him first. Even though He is the only objectively
eternal God, yet men must choose Him above all the
influential non-existent gods to gain His salvation.
In Japan, those who respond to the gospel are often so
grateful for the knowledge of one God after having eight
hundred thousand to choose from. It gives unity to life, and
with one God to concentrate upon they can get to know
Him. This is one of God's major purposes in this first
commandment. God wants to be known, and the best way
for man to get to know Him is by concentration on Him
alone as ones ultimate relationship. We will focus on this in
the next chapter.
4. CONCENTRATION COMMANDED
A salesman who was growing more and more nervous
about his travel by air went one day to see a statistician.
"Can you tell me what the odds would be against my
boarding an aircraft on which somebody had hidden a

bomb?" he asked. He replied, "I can't tell you until I've
analyzed the available data. Come back again in a week."
The next week the worried salesman returned and asked if
the answer was ready. "Yes," said the statistician, "the
odds are one million to one against you getting on an aircraft
with one bomb on it." "Those are good odds," said the
salesman, "but I'm not sure they are good enough for me. I
travel a good deal." "Well then, if you really want to be
safe, "The statistician counseled, "carry a bomb with you.
My calculations indicate the odds are one billion to one
against your boarding an aircraft with two bombs on it."
This is obviously crazy advice, but the statistics are
correct and they reveal how you can prove anything with
statistics. The jump of the odds from one million to one
billion also points out what a radical difference there can be
between one and two. Upon close examination we find the
most radical transition anywhere is the jump from one to
two.
Elton Trueblood, the outstanding Quaker theologian,
points out some things of interest here. He says that the step
from two to three is relatively slight, but the step from one to
two is enormous. Why? Because when you go from two to
three you are going from one degree of plurality to another,
but when you go from one to two you leapt out of one
category into another totally different, not only in degree but
in kind, for you leap from singularity into to plurality. For
example, if a man has two or three wives or any number
beyond this he remains in the same class-he is a polygamist.

But if he has one wife he is a monogamist. To go from one to
two is a change in class, but to go from two to any other
number is only a change of degree within the same class. To
go from two to any other number is just a change in
quantity, but to go from one to two is a change in quality.
One is the most unique of all numbers, not only because it
is the beginning of numbers, but because it represents a class
all it's own. Singularity refers to one, and one only, but
plurality refers to all the rest from two to infinity.
Trueblood says, "There is more essential difference between
one and two then there is between two and a million." This
is more than an interesting fact of mathematics, it is an
important theological truth. One is the great theological
number, for ultimates are characterized by singularity, and
they call for undivided concentrated commitment. Paul in
Eph. 4 says, "There is one body and one Spirit, just as you
were called to the one hope that belongs to your call, one
Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of us
all..."
Christianity is characterized by oneness, and we find this
is also central in the Old Testament. The most basic text of
Judaism is Deut. 6:4, "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God is
one Lord." One God is the foundational doctrine of the
Bible, and that is why commandment number one deals with
the fundamental issue of oneness. God prohibits a plurality
of gods and demands singular and concentrated devotion to
Himself. No other category but oneness is acceptable. He
will tolerate nothing but that unique class of number one.

The Old Testament emphasis is on the prohibition of
polytheism. The New Testament emphasis is on the positive
concentrated devotion to the one God. Both have the same
goal, but before one can concentrate he has to get rid of his
divisive loyalties. Let's look first at the Old Testament
emphasis which-
I. PROHIBITS COMPOUND DEVOTION: It might be
hard for us to conceive in this day of growing atheism and
anti-religious attitudes, but one of man's basic problems has
always been that he is too religious. Man's tendency has
always been to believe too much rather than too little. The
result is, his religion distorts all of reality and becomes a vice
rather than a virtue. Doctor John Baillie says, "A pagan is
not a man who does not believe in and worship deity, but a
man who believes in and worships too many deities." The
pagan is too religious. He has no unity of life, but is a
shambles of disunity, tossed about by fears and uncertainty.
He is at the mercy of gods everywhere, and never knows for
sure how to placate them or gain their favor.
Paul in Rom. 1 says that one of the worst curses that ever
befell man was when God gave them up to worship their
manifold gods. As too many cooks spoil the soup, so too
many gods spoil life. When you have gods galore and even
more, your devotions are divided. There is no basis for unity
in the individual or society. Chaos reigns within and
without. Every man creates his God in his own image. Too
much religion can be more of an enemy to mans unity than
no religion.

The Jews came out of Egypt where there were many gods,
and they were headed for Canaan where there were many
gods. The only hope for Israel to become a unified nation
was to prohibit them from giving devotion to the plurality of
gods they would encounter. Even two gods is one too many,
for it divides man, and man cannot be divided in his
ultimate loyalties and be happy. Jesus said that we cannot
serve God and mammon. You will love the one and hate the
other he said. A compound ultimate devotion is a
psychological impossibility.
This is a universe and not a multiverse. The planets
revolve around a single Sun, and so it must be with man. He
cannot have a duel or plural center and be happy. He must
have a single center, a single devotion, a single God.
Oneness is the only category into which ultimate value will
fit. Science confirms monotheism by revealing the unity of
all creation. There is only one Creator of this unity, for all
is regulated by one system of law.
Now you might think that this commandment is not
relevant for our day. The choice now is not between one
God and many, but between one God and none. Atheism
and not polytheism is the great competitor for mans loyalty
today. Gods Word prohibits the jump from one to two, and
God demands that His people reduce their devotion to one
God, but the atheist wants to reduce even further and have
no God at all. Even one is one too many for them. But
atheism is really only a subtle move to get back to

polytheism. Even the atheist and unbeliever has values
which become the object of his highest devotion. For some it
is the state, or money, or pleasure, or power, or fame, but
every man has his gods, and if he does not have one, and one
only, he will have several. Oneness alone is ultimate, and if
man goes either way, ahead to two or more, or back to none,
he opens himself up to an infinite number of gods. No God
and many gods leave a man in the same boat. Atheism and
polytheism both leave men empty, for neither provides for
an ultimate loyalty. Man only rejects the one true God
because of his foolish desire for a plurality of gods, and this
is as true today as it was in the ancient world, and it leads to
the same problem of lack of unity.
Civilized men in America are polytheist and their
broadminded message is, "All gods are the true god, and
everyone is a prophet." Everyone makes his own god in his
own image. The effect of this plurality of gods demanding
devotion is the same as it has always been. There is a
breakdown in unity, a loss of standards of morality, and it is
every man for himself. There is no longer a single voice to
follow, but a host of voices calling men to go different
directions. Man's nature cannot stand this disunity,
however, and so there is a desperate effort to find a cause
that will satisfy the craving for oneness. Man needs oneness
even if he rejects the oneness of God. He searches for a
single ultimate loyalty to which he can give undivided
devotion. Conrad Aikin in Time In The Rock, expressed the
mind of those caught in the whirlpool of plurality, but
recognizing the need for a single cause to give life unity and

meaning-
We need a theme! Than let that be our theme:
That we, poor grovellers between faith and doubt,
The sun and north star lost, and compass out,
The heart's engine all but stopped, the time
Timeless in this chaos of our wills-
That we must ask a theme, something to think,
Something to say, between dawn and dark,
Something to hold to, something to love.
Man's very nature cries out for a single ultimate
loyalty--something to hold too, something to love.
The First Commandment is God's merciful attempt to
help man avoid the painful search for a way out of the
darkness and despair of a plurality of devotions, to the light
and love of a single devotion. Even with this prohibition,
however, Israel failed time and time again before she learned
the truth stated by H. G. Wells, "Until a man has found God
he begins at no beginning, and works to no end." After
much suffering for disobedience, Israel finally did forsake all
other gods, and escaped the disunity of compound devotion.
So when we come to the New Testament we see Jesus
emphasizing the positive aspect of the First Commandment
which-
II. PROMOTES CONCENTRATED DEVOTION:
Jesus said the First Commandment is that we are to love
God with all our hearts, minds, and soul. The negative

aspect of the command is its exclusiveness. It excludes all
other gods and demands that they be eliminated. Positively,
it is an inclusive commandment, for it calls not for just one
aspect of our devotion, but for all aspects of it. It demands
that the plurality of our nature be united in an undivided
concentrated devotion. Our whole nature is to be united
around the oneness of God.
One God, one law, one element,
And one far-off divine event
To which the whole creation moves.
Concentrated devotion is the fundamental principle
necessary for all success. That is why it is the First
Commandment. If we do not start here we will get nowhere.
God knows that concentration is essential and that none will
be able to keep His law and be pleasing to Him if they do not
acquire the singleness of devotion required by this First
Commandment.
If a man cannot have a concentrated devotion to one
God, how can it be expected that he will be able to be
committed to lesser loyalties? A man who fails to obey the
First Commandment is likely to break all the rest, for they
are a unity and all depend on the first. Jesus taught that if
we love God with all of our nature the rest of the
commandments will fall into place and be fulfilled in love. A
small boy reading a well-known hymn read it wrong, but the
wrong reading was still a basic truth. He read, "take my life
and let it be concentrated Lord on thee." Emerson said,

"The one prudence in life is concentration, the one evil is
dissipation."
Vance Havner, like many others, is convinced that the
weakness of Christians today is the result of their dissipated
devotion. He writes, "there are not a few saints today who
spread themselves out too thinly. They are taken up with so
many good concerns that too many irons are in the fire.
They attack along a front so long that they never advance
anywhere. They would do more if they did less." Aaron
Crane, and efficiency expert wrote, "the mind cannot
successfully attend to two things at once, for a part of the
mind can never accomplish as much as the whole, and
divided attention always causes inefficiency in some
direction." That is why Paul said, "this one thing I do," and
not these twenty things I dabble at.
God is the greatest efficiency expert and that is why He
demands concentrated devotion. He knows that a divided
devotion creates an unstable life. A young man was
proposing to his girlfriend and he said, "I am not wealthy
like Jerome, and I don't have a yacht and convertible like
Jerome, but my darling I love you." The girl responded, "I
love you too, but tell me more about this Jerome." She had
a divided devotion, and when you offer a divided devotion
you offer a mutilated devotion, and we do not want that kind
of devotion even on the human level. How much less does
God want it? His nature demands the whole of our devotion
and so does our happiness.

During the Civil War the Southern States kept making
offers to Lincoln. They offered to give up more and more
territory if the rest would be allowed to remain independent.
Lincoln, however, met each new offer with refusal, and at a
Conference he placed his hand on a map so as to cover all
the Southern States, and gave this ultimatum, "Gentlemen,
this government must have the whole." Lincoln demanded
total unity with no exception. "A nation divided against
itself cannot stand," he said, and God says the same of the
soul. A soul divided in its loyalties cannot stand, and that it
why He demands that our devotion be concentrated on one
God--Himself.
Arthur Sweltz in New Directions From The Ten
Commandments, tells about the movie, Save The Tiger.
Jack Lemmon plays the role of a man who lived during
World War II. He accepted good and bad in life as his
parents had and their parents before them. Now he feels
lost, however, for the routine of life had been shattered. He
says, "There are not rules anymore, just referees."
Everything is relative, but relative to what? He had lost his
foundation and life becomes very insecure without a
foundation. That is why God gave man this First
Commandment. He begins his letter to His
people--exclusively yours. He does this, not only because He
is the only God, but also because the gods those men invent
rob them of the freedom they were meant to enjoy. In a
maze there are many ways to go, but only one leads to
freedom. God in this First Commandment is putting up a
sign, which says, in the maze of life this is the way to go. He

does not do it to make life limited, but just the opposite, to
prevent men from dead ends, and lead them to freedom.
Man has only two choices--he can follow the God who made
him, or follow the gods he makes. The one leads to life and
freedom, and the other to bondage and death.
This First Commandment is a law of love, for God knows
we cannot be happy in split-level living with dual or multiple
gods demanding our devotion. The law is God's
preventative love, whereas the cross is God's redeeming love.
If I say to my son,"thou shalt not go near the river," that is a
law of love given to prevent him from danger and death.
But if he defies this law of love and goes and falls in anyway
and I leap in and save him, that is redeeming love. In the
law God warns, but in the cross God rescues and redeems.
Love is the motive behind both.
The law could not redeem man anymore than my
prohibition could pull my son out of the river. God had to
give His Son to redeem us and save us from the
consequences of sin, but after being delivered, the law still
stands as a law of love to prevent further folly and falls.
After I rescue my son from the river, he still needs to heed
the command to stay away from it. The law is even more
meaningful now, for he knows the dangerous consequences
of disobedience.
So it is with the First Commandment of God. The
Christian can appreciate and experience its great value more
than ever. He can avoid the dangers and unhappiness that

comes from lack of concentrated devotion to one ultimate
and absolute God. Let us, therefore, concentrate our
devotion, and make the choice that G.A. Studdert-Kennedy
made in his poem-
All war must end in Peace. These clouds are lies.
They cannot last. The blue sky is the Truth.
For God is love. Such is my Faith, and such
My reasons for it, and I find it strong
Enough. And you? You want to argue? Well,
I can't. It is a choice. I choose the Christ.
None of us can do everything in life, but all of us can do the
most important thing in life--we can make this choice, and
by such concentrated devotion obey the First
Commandment.
5. RELAXATION COMMANDED
A young boy was visiting his uncle on a Sunday when a
new neighbor knocked at the door. When he answered it,
and learned that he wanted to borrow the lawn mower, he
conveyed the message to his uncle. The uncle said, "If he
mows his lawn on the Sabbath he'll be breaking the Ten
Commandments. So go and tell him that we have no lawn
mower."

When a man will lie and break the Ten Commandments
in order to keep someone else from breaking them, one
suspects the compelling motivation is not a humanitarian
heart, but a selfish one. Besides breaking the law of God
himself, the uncle did not prevent his neighbor from doing
so, for one does not keep the Sabbath by the mere negative
fact of lacking a lawn mower. Obedience to the fourth
commandment is a matter of one's attitude and relationship
to God. No amount of legislation and coercion can give to
men the essence of the value of the fourth commandment.
Law and force can retrain a man from doing many things,
but it cannot compel him to keep the Sabbath holy as a day
of rest and worship.
One of the perpetual problems of our nation is the
problem of the church and state in relation to the law. This
was no problem in Israel, for the church and state were one.
A crime against God, which we would call a sin, was a crime
against the state. It was an act of treason against the ruler of
the land, and, therefore, punishable as a crime.
In America a sin is not necessarily a crime. Over half of
the Ten Commandments can be broken, and it is of no
concern to the state as far as the law goes. We feel it is not
within the jurisdiction of the state to legislate on matters of
religion. The New Testament makes it clear the Pharisees
legislated the blessings of the Sabbath right out of existence,
and made it a burden. Jesus refused to be bound by man
made laws for this day. He said the Sabbath was made for
man, not man for the Sabbath. It was a gift of God for

man's benefit, and so He threw overboard the legalistic
legislation, and used the Sabbath for teaching, healing, and
doing good. They, of course, hated and despised Him for His
lawlessness. They sought to kill Him as a Sabbath breaker,
but Jesus refused to be bound by legalism.
The Puritans were also infected with this germ of
legalism, and in some ways, in spite of their greatness, and
powerful influence for good in our nation, were just like the
Pharisees in their strictness for details. Richard Brathwaite
wrote,
To Brandbury came I, O profane one!
Where I saw a Puritane one
Hanging of his cat on Monday,
For killing of a mouse on Sunday.
Whether this is fact or fiction, we have many actual laws
on record that show they meant business when it came to
keeping the Sabbath. One of the Pilgrim fathers drew up a
code of laws for the state of Massachusetts, and this was one
of them. "Whosoever shall profane the Lord's Day by doing
any unnecessary work,
by unnecessary traveling or by sports and recreation, he or
they who so transgress shall forfeit forty shillings, or be
publicly whipped; but if it shall appear to have been done
presumptuously, such person or persons shall be put to
death, or otherwise severely punished at the discretion of the
court."
If such laws were in force today, America would be a

different nation, especially on Sunday. But Christians would
be the first to protest such legislation, and they should be,
for this is not the purpose of government to legislate religious
conviction. The state has no right to impose the conviction of
any group on the rest of the citizens. We would not want the
Seventh Day Adventist conviction imposed on us, forcing us
to worship on Saturday. Nor do they want ours imposed on
them. It is true that forcing people to take a day off for rest
and worship would be good for them, but so would it be
good if they got to bed early, drank a lot of juice, and ate
lettuce, but who would want these to be matters of
legislation? To get the full value of what God intended by
this fourth commandment one must chose to obey it with a
free and committed will.
This is one of the two commandments that is stated
positively, but it also has a negative aspect which we want to
look at briefly before looking at the positive. The negative
aspect-
I. PROHIBITS PERPETUAL LABOR.
It is important that we see the limitation of what is
prohibited. Pleasure, laughter, and recreation are not
prohibited. It is the labor of life that is to halt on this day.
It is to be a day off for everyone, even the slaves, so that it is
a day of rest and happiness for all. By prohibiting work one
day in seven God made all men in the community equal in
their dignity before Him. All had the equal right to rest and
worship. All had the right to have time to develop their

souls, and maintain the health of their body. This
commandment was God's greatest gift to man in the Old
Testament, for it alone gave every man equal freedom to be
what God wanted them to be.
The Sabbath is God's testimony to, and preservation of,
the dignity of man. H. Cohen, a Jewish author, writes, "The
Sabbath became the most effective patron-saint of the
Jewish people. The ghetto Jew discarded all the toil and
trouble of his daily life when the Sabbath lamp was lit. All
insult and outrage was shaken off. The love of God, which
returned to him the Sabbath each seventh day, restored to
him also his honor and human dignity even in his lowly
hut." Another Jewish author said, "There is no Judaism
without the Sabbath." The Sabbath played a major role in
the preservation of Israel in her exile.
This gift of one day in seven free from labor was not just
for the good of the Jews, but for the good of all men. Jesus
said it was made for man, and just for Israel. The Jews
recognized this also, and Cohen writes again, "Had Judaism
brought into the world only the Sabbath, it would thereby
have proved itself to be a producer of joy and a promoter of
peace for mankind. The Sabbath was the first step on the
road which led to the abrogation of slavery." By prohibiting
perpetual labor God guaranteed that every person would be
free from the tyranny of materialism, and free to give a
portion of his life to develop his eternal soul, and the higher
faculties of manhood.

Life has changed a great deal from Biblical days, and we
do not put in the hours of toil to earn a living as men use to,
but the fact remains, we can still be so busy,
even if we only work five days a week, that we are slaves to
the flesh, and servants of the tyrant of materialism. We are
not to worry about the letter of the law, for life is too
different for that to have meaning today, but the spirit of the
prohibition of perpetual labor is still relevant and essential
for the Christian life. It is wrong to be so busy that our
physical health and spiritual life is neglected. God demands
that we take time off from the business of making a living in
order to live. An old Negro spiritual captures the idea.
Slow me down, Lawd, I'se agoin too fast,
I can't see my brother when he's walkin past,
I miss a lot of good things day by day,
I don't know a blessing when it comes my way.
We must slow down and obey this negative aspect of the
commandment which prohibits perpetual labor if we ever
hope to gain the benefits of the positive aspect which we
want to consider next, and which,
II. PROMOTES PROFITABLE LEISURE.
You will notice that nothing is said about worship. That
comes in as a logical consequence, but the essence of the
command is for relaxation. To keep it holy does not mean to
worship. It means to keep it separate and distinct, and
different. It means to keep it a day dedicated to God. This

includes worship, but all the emphasis is on rest. You might
think that all this fuss about relaxation is majoring on a
minor. Why should one of the Ten Commandments, and the
longest one at that, be a command to relax?
God made us, and He happens to know what is essential
to the well being of our body, mind, and spirit. Many tests
have been taken that prove relaxation must balance out
exertion if one is going to have a healthy life. Man's whole
system rebels against continuous monotony and endless
repetition-what we call being in a rut. God built the need
for diversity and variety into our very being. Then He gave
the gift of the Sabbath that we might satisfy that need.
Neglect of this leads to the inability to relax, and the result is
we become irritable and depressed. A problem that could be
handled with ease ordinarily becomes a major calamity
when we are exhausted. We become sarcastic and
pessimistic about life. Women easily cry, and men easily lose
their temper, and if you could add up all the sorrow that
comes to life due to lack of relaxation, you would realize the
importance of this fourth commandment to all of society.
Man needs a day of rest from toil and release from
tension. He needs a day on which he can renounce the
temporal and be receptive to the eternal. An English doctor,
George Newman said, "Most people stand in greater need of
rest than of movement. There is an excess of noise, clatter
and meaningless activities." Thousands of quotes from
authorities in many fields demonstrate, beyond a shadow of
a doubt, that one day of rest in seven is a must for those who

are interested in good health. God is concerned about our
bodies. Jesus spent a good many of His Sabbaths healing the
bodies of people. We should be concerned also, and practice
God's prescription for good health.
A day of rest is not only essential for the body but for the
mind as well. Doctor Crichton Browne said, "We doctors
are now constantly compelled in the treatment of nervous
diseases to prescribe periods of absolute rest and complete
seclusion. Some periods are, I think, only Sundays in
arrears." If we do not take periodic rest, or if we do not
grant God one day in seven on the installment plan, we may
have to pay it all in one lump sum by enforced rest through
illness. For example, the people of Israel spent four hundred
and ninety years in the promise land and neglected to obey
God's law of letting the land rest one in seven years. They
let seventy Sabbath years pass by unheeded, but they only
hurt themselves, and gained God's judgment, for they were
carried away into captivity for seventy years, and the land
got its seventy Sabbath years of rest. II Chron. 36:20-21
says, "He took into exile in Babylon those who had escaped
the sword......To fulfill the Word of Lord by the mouth of
Jeremiah, until the land had enjoyed it's Sabbaths. All the
days that it lay desolate it kept Sabbath, to fulfill seventy
years.
God takes the need for relaxation very seriously.
Everything needs rest, even land and animals. It is just a
basic principle of life, and not to obey God's command to
relax is to try and defy the laws that govern both physical

and spiritual reality. The only alternative to obedience is to
suffer the consequences. A Jewish author said, "This is the
meaning of the Jewish Sabbath, to give to man peaceful
hours, hours completely diverted from every day life,
seclusion from the world in the midst of the world."
This is essential for us as Christians. We can never be
in the world but not of the world if we never find seclusion
from the world. Vance Havner wrote, "It is high time we
learn that in this nerve-wrecking maddening modern rush,
we have let the spirit of the times rob us utterly of mediation,
devotion, and rest. There is no depth to us. A lot of our
Christian life and work is frothy, superficial, and thin.
We are growing mushrooms, not oaks. We spread ourselves
too thinly, striking everywhere and hitting hard nowhere.
We Christians often lead dissipated lives, squandering our
energies in a multitude of good things but becoming so
exhausted that none of it counts for much."
The Jews used one day in seven to develop their mind
and soul. It was their chance to read and grow in wisdom.
It was a day to let their spirit catch up with their bodies that
they might be whole men again. You would not find them
wasting the day in idleness. Philo, " Moses did not give the
name of rest to mere inactivity."
They were active, but in away that added variety to life, and
gave their inner man a chance for expression. Modern man
still has not learned what the Jews had to learn the hard
way. The result is increasing heart attacks, mental illness,
and ignorance of the Word of God. Body, mind, and spirit

all suffer where the fourth commandment is not obeyed.
Lord Dawson in a lecture on Some Varieties of Headache
said, "So often the day of rest sees the same strenuousness
and feverish activity as the day of work. It is relaxation that
is needed and its ark requires study."
One of the reasons Christians often have serious mental,
physical, and spiritual problems is due to the angelic fallacy,
as Dr. Bob Smith called it. It is the false idea that we are
angels rather then men, and that we do not have to obey the
laws of God concerning the limits of the human body. No
matter how spiritual you are, if you push yourself and do not
get adequate rest, you will be an irritable person. You will
not need a den in your house, for you will growl in every
room. You will be hard to live with, and a poor testimony
for the Lord. You will let Satan trick you with the angelic
fallacy. This is the very trick he tried on Jesus. He told
Jesus to jump off the temple and God would save Him.
Jesus knew that was tempting God for He had to live by the
laws of the flesh, and walk down the stairs like everyone else.
Satan says to us that we do not need to waste time in
relaxation, and when we listen and obey him we miss the
benefits of God's plan of relaxation.
The guy who says the devil never takes a vacation and so
why should I, is not being super spiritual, for that is the
angelic fallacy. Satan doesn't need a vacation, but we do, for
we have the limitations of flesh. If we do not obey the
limitations we suffer the consequences. Dr. David H. Fink in

Release From Nervous Tension says that the first step to help
is learning the technique of relaxation. Man is the only
creature that finds it so hard to relax that God had to make
it a command.
Worship goes hand in hand with relaxation, for it takes
us into a different world where we escape the tensions and
pressures of time. Worship has physical and mental, as well
as spiritual values. It aids the body in relaxing. William
James, the dean of American psychologists wrote and essay
on the Gospel Of Relaxation. He pointed out the folly of
men in trying to solve all life's problems by mental and
physical labor when the answer to many of them is found in
rest. He wrote, "The way to success, as vouched for by
innumerable authentic personal narratives, is
by...surrender...passivity, not activity--relaxation, not
intentness, should now be the rule." Studies show that
nearly all the discoveries in research laboratories come as
hunches during a period of relaxation.
It is a great paradox, but we will never get as far as God
wants us to go unless we stop. Standing still is the key to
moving forward. Those pioneers who traveled across the
country without a let up saw their animals and wagons
break down from over use, but those who took a day off to
rest, in obedience to the fourth commandment, were able to
press on and reach their goal. God's law applies to us today,
and either we learn to relax, or we will pay the penalty.
Rest is one of God's greatest gifts. Salvation is a form of

rest. Jesus said, "Come unto me all ye that labor and are
heavy laden, and I will give you rest." You don't have to
labor and work your way into favor with God. You need
only to surrender to Christ and rest on His finished work.
The peace and security of salvation is found in rest and not
labor. Just as the peace of sleep does not come by clinging to
the bed, but by surrender and relaxation upon the bed, so
salvation does not come by our striving, but by trust in
Christ and resting upon His promise. The Sabbath is a
symbol of our faith and rest in Christ. Obedience to this
fourth commandment is our way of saying we trust in Christ
and rest on Him, and not in our own labor.
6. IMAGINATION COMMANDED
Back in the 60's eight wrestlers took their own lives because
world champion 37 year old Gohlam-Rexa committed
suicide. Three of them left notes saying they could not stand
the death of their idol. Almost every time a well-known
person takes their own life some of their worshipers do the
same. Idolatry is alive and well in our world today. We are
deceived if we think idolatry is not a modern problem. It is
one of the most common sins of our day.
So often we connect sin with sex, as if sex was the major
area of human sin, but in the Ten Commandments that is
number 7 on the list while idolatry is number 2. From God's

perspective idolatry is a greater danger than immorality
because idolatry is the cause for immorality. Men would not
be so immoral if they did not idolize sex.
When man takes a real but relative value, and makes it
absolute, he perverts it. That is why idolatry is mans
greatest problem, for by it he ruins, destroys, and perverts
all of the good things of life. By absolutizing the relative, or
by putting the good in place of the best, man distorts reality
and lives a life out of balance with the laws of God. True
faith is faith in the truly ultimate--it is faith in God.
Idolatrous faith is a putting of ones trust in some finite
reality which has been raised to the level of the ultimate.
If sex, science, the state, society, or superstars are made
the ultimate values in our lives, they become idols. The
result will be we will take these valid values and turn them
into monsters of evil, for nothing can be God but God
without leading men into one kind of hell or another.
There has been some progress in the history of idolatry.
Modern man is not quite so conspicuous about it. He no
longer bows before idols of wood and stone. He has become
far cleverer in disguising his worship. The poet reveals one
area of this higher level idolatry.
The heathen in his blindness
Bows down to wood and stone.
The Christian in his wisdom
Bows down to gold alone.

Man has become more sophisticated in his folly. His
idolatry is on a level that sometimes is almost noble. The old
gods have been destroyed and their temples burned.
Centuries ago, Edwin, the ruler of Northumbria in Britain,
accepted Christ and called for an uprising against the useless
gods in the temple. The high priest galloped towards the
temple in the sight of all the people, and he hurled a lance
into the interior where the idols were. When this sacrilege
remained unpunished, the people at the command of this
daring challenger of the gods proceeded to overthrow and
burn the temple. These days of the glorious overthrow of
visible idols are over, but the battle against idolatry
continues in full force.
Erich Fromm, a social scientist, in his book, The Sane
Society, writes, "Is it not time to cease to argue about God,
and instead to unite in the unmasking of contemporary
forms of idolatry? Today it is not Baal and Astarte but the
deification of the state and of power in authoritarian
countries and the deification of the machine and of success
in our own culture."
William Jennings Bryan pointed out long ago that some
forms of idolatry are on such a high level that they produce
good, and that is why we are blind to their dangers. The
man whose god is gold is often very industrious, zealous, and
clever, and we praise him for these qualities which lead him
to his success in his idolatry. The man who worships fame
and does his best to attain it may do much good for the state
and community. Therefore, we respect his form of idolatry.

We are impressed with any form of idolatry that succeeds,
and so we tend to idolize success. As we study this
command, therefore, we must recognize it is Gods Word for
us today and not just a record of His Word to others of the
past.
Like the First Commandment, this one has a negative and
a positive side to it. And, again, the Old Testament
emphasis is on the negative, whereas, Jesus emphasized the
positive. The negative must come first, however, for as we
said on the First Commandment, all other gods must be
eliminated before concentrated dovotion can be given to the
one true God. So also, sensual idolatrous worship must be
eliminated before man can worship God truly in spirit and
in truth. Let's consider the negative first which-
I. PROHIBITS IDOLATROUS OR SENSUAL WORSHIP.
Idolatry is basically the worship of the visible and,
therefore, God prohibits any image of any likeness of
anything in heaven, earth, or sea to be an aid in worship, for
the aid tends to become an object of worship.
It is important that we recognize that true worship is
what is being protected by this Second Commandment. The
First Commandment was to eliminate worship of all false
gods, and the Second is to eliminate all false forms of
worship of the true God. In other words, it would be
possible to be monotheist, and obey the First Commandment
by having no other gods but Jehovah, and yet be an idolater

by worshipping Jehovah in the form of some idol. This is
exactly what happened while Moses was receiving the Ten
Commandments. The people in their craving for a visible
god melted all their gold and made a golden calf to represent
Jehovah. Aaron proclaimed a feast to the Lord, and they
worshiped and sacrificed to the golden calf as the god who
brought them out of the land of Egypt. It was a symbol of
the true God, but this is what is being forbidden by this
Commandment, for it reduces God to the level of a visible
thing.
This same thing happened when Jeroboam divided the
kingdom and established a new worship in Israel. He did it
so the people would not have to go into the southern
kingdom of Judah to worship at Jerusalem. He was not
advocating the worship of other gods and breaking the First
Commandment. He was breaking the Second
Commandment by setting up idols to represent the true
God. In I Kings 12:28 we read, "So the king took counsel,
and made two calves of gold. And he said to the people, you
have gone up to Jerusalem long enough. Behold your gods,
O Israel, who brought you up out of the land of Egypt."
Idolatry, we see, can be either a visible substitute for the
invisible God, or a visible representation of Him who is
unseen. In either case idolatry is involved only when worship
or service is an issue. You are not to bow down or serve them
is stressed over and over in the Old Testament. Lev. 26:1
says, "Ye shall make no graven image, neither shall ye set up
any image of stone to bow down to it." Deut. 16:22 says,

"Neither shalt thou set up any image which the Lord Thy
God hateth." Ps.97:7 says, "Confounded be all they that
serve graven images."
Even if the image represents your idea of the true God, it
is wrong and folly to worship it, for God can only be
dishonored by such an image. It is absurd to bow to what
represents God when the One it represents is ever present.
No mate would be pleased if they were ignored while great
respect is given to their picture. Thomas Watson, the old
Puritan, has a delightful rebuke to those who defend idols
because they remind them of God. He says this is as if a
woman should say she keeps company with another man to
put her in mind of her husband. There is no way to justify
any use whatever of any representation of God. It took Israel
a long time to learn this. Watson wrote, "If you search
through the whole Bible, there is not one sin that God has
more followed with plague than idolatry. The Jews have a
saying, that in every evil that befalls them, there is an ounce
of the golden calf in it." God is a jealous God, and He will no
more tolerate an idol than any man would tolerate his wife
keeping the picture of a lover on their bedroom dresser. God
demands loyalty of His bride, and this means no competition
with visible images of any kind.
If you apply this Second Commandment to all contexts,
regardless of their relationship to worship, you have the
extreme position the Jews finally came to, as well as the
Mohammedans and some Christians. Art and sculpture were
forbidden entirely. There have been great musical geniuses

like Mozart, Beethoven, and Mendelssohn, but who ever
heard of a great Jewish artist or sculptor? Their temples are
without any paintings or statues. Some Christians have even
refused to have their pictures taken because it produces an
image. This extreme position has no support in Scripture. It
is, in fact, an idolatrous exaltation of the Second
Commandment to a level above the Word of God. A Jewish
saying goes, "The Torah warns us not to make idols of God's
commandments." This is what the extreme view of the
Second Commandment does. It makes an idol of the
command against idols.
God in this commandment prohibited sensual worship,
but He did not prohibit art or sculpture. All of the statures
of famous people in capitol buildings and parks are not idols,
for they are not objects of worship. If people bowed to them
and worshiped them they would be, but this is not likely a
problem. Images are not idols unless they are connected with
worship and service. God commanded that two images of
Cherubim be set up to overshadow the mercy seat in the
Holy of Holies. He also commanded the image of the serpent
to be set up on a pole so that people could look at it and be
cured when they were bitten. It just so happened that this
image did become an idol to people and it had to be
destroyed, but it was a legitimate image authorized by God.
People can take what is not an idol and make it one. They
can worship any picture or any statue, but this does not
make them a violation of the Second Commandment in
themselves. They can be just as legitimate as the serpent God
commanded be set up for good, but people can abuse the

good and make it evil. Until they do so, however, the good is
still good. The creative arts are to be enjoyed. God used
creative men to make His temple filled with beautiful images
on the walls. He is not opposed to creating beauty in things.
He is only opposed to images being used to represent Him,
and thus used as objects of worship. The reason for this will
be clear as we consider the positive side of the
commandment which-
II. PROMOTES IMAGINATIVE OR SPIRITUAL
WORSHIP.
Jesus gave us the positive side when He said, "God is
spirit and those who worship Him must worship Him in
spirit and in truth." God cannot be reduced to an object.
True worship depends upon the imagination, for where
anything visible is an object of worship, even if it represents
the true God, it is idolatry. One of the reasons there is no
authentic picture of Christ is, no doubt, the danger of
idolatry. And if we had even one sliver of the real cross of
Christ it would be held in reverence and be considered
priceless, when in reality it would have no more value than a
broken matchstick. Man has this tendency to reverence
things, however, and to give to them the devotion due to
God alone. The Second Commandment is given to protect
man from this tendency, and lead him to a high spiritual
concept of God.
God is Spirit and He does not want sensual worship. He
wants spiritual worship. Jesus said we are to love God with

all our minds and souls, and this calls for a committed
imagination. Imagination is essential to effective Christian
worship. Leslie Weatherhead wrote, "The imagination, we
must remember, is not only a faculty by which we may
conjure up something that has no existence in reality, but by
which we may apprehend a reality which cannot be seen. If
it is scientific to use the faculty of sight to make sure of the
presence of a visible person, why is it unscientific to use the
faculty of imagination to realize a unseen presence?"
If you ask what imagination is you enter a vast field of
investigation. Alex Osborn said, "It is a tough question
because that word is wider than a three ring circus tent and
covers wild beasts as well as tame." It has over 50
synonyms. Like so many things that are hard to define and
talk about, we know about the imagination by experience.
We have this faculty in us. Someone said that a bee stinger
is only three tenths of an inch long--the other two inches is
imagination. Imagination is that faculty that has been called
the eye of the soul. In itself it is no more virtuous or skillful
than the physical eye of the body. It too must be developed
and trained or it can be very faulty. But this is the faculty
which is to supply the images for the worship of God rather
than the eye of the body.
If you object that mental images can be as faulty as metal
ones, you are right. But the mental image is fluid, and can
be changed by increased knowledge and maturity of
understanding. A physical image is fixed and tends to hold
back growth in our understanding of God. The image

degrades God and limits God to the sensual, whereas, the
imagination is a wide-open field for advancement allowing
man to penetrate deeper and deeper into the unseen realm o
spirit and truth.
The Second Commandment was given to help man escape
the bondage of the flesh, and to rise to the high level of
spiritual fellowship. God often cannot get through to men at
all because of their dead imagination. They are slaves of the
invisible, and have no capacity to see the vision of spiritual
values. Jesus said that we must become as little children to
enter the kingdom of heaven, and certainly one of factors
involved here is the imagination. Children are open to the
world of spirit. Reality is not shut up to the physical and
visible for them. Macaulay said, "He who, in an enlightened
and literary society, aspires to be a great poet must first
become a little child." He is only echoing Christ, and is
adding his testimony to the evidence that says man can
never rise to the highest level of his nature if he loses his
childlike imagination. God wants man to worship Him on
this highest spiritual level where his imagination plays a
major role.
Napoleon said, "Imagination rules the world." Arthur
Brisbane wrote, "Like color and perfume in a flower, the
fruit of a tree, imagination is the highest, noblest attribute of
a human being. It is the quality that sees truths by intuition,
that carries the mind flying through space, the forerunner of
all useful, material achievements of human beings." If
imagination is essential for material progress, how much

more is it essential for the advancement of the spirit?
The materialist likes to think he deals only with the facts,
as if imagination, hope, thought, and prayer were not as
much facts as bricks and bones and sticks and stones.
Imagination is one of the greatest facts, for it allows man to
reach out beyond his five senses into the supersensual realm.
When men refuse to use this faculty for worship, and instead
bring God down to the level that can be grasped by their
senses, they break the Second Commandment.
All arguments, therefore, that seek to justify the use of
images because they make it easier to worship are arguments
in defense of the very thing that is forbidden. No doubt,
there are impressive statues that could stimulate awe, but
they would then become the objects of adoration and detract
from our adoration of God. Ernest Thompson wrote,
"History has shown that the use of any material symbol in
worship is attended by two dangers. The first is that men lift
the symbol up to the level of God; the second that they drag
God down to the level of the symbol." A visual image soon
becomes an end rather than a means. There is a subtle shift
from faith to sight. If you must see anything to feel you have
worshipped God you are in danger of the most subtle kind of
idolatry.
True worship comes from within, and is dependent upon
a sanctified imagination. The Second Commandment is a
call to forsake the dependence upon the sensual and climb to
the higher level of spiritual worship. If you reduce God to a

material image you reduce Him to time and space and have
a man made god, not the God of Scripture. A material
image of God locks Him into a static unchanging form and
reduces the infinite to the finite. The essence of this Second
Commandment is that God if infinite and it not to be locked
into any finite form. He must be worshiped in spirit and in
truth so that He can keep on growing in our minds as we
gain more light about His nature. We are never to limit His
unlimited nature, but be ever open to grow in our awareness
of who God is. That is why imagination is essential to
authentic worship, and why it is commanded.
7. SANCTIFICATION COMMANDED
During the Civil War one company of soldiers adopted a
rule that every man who swore would be required to read
aloud a chapter from the Bible. While that rule was in force
one private read all of Genesis and Exodus and was starting
on Leviticus. The one recording the experience said he had
a fine prospect of finishing the Old Testament before his
three months enlistment was up. If ever there was a good
thing done for a bad reason, this was it. I suspect that the
Bible societies could scarcely meet the demand if this rule
was in force today. Swearing and using the name of God
and Christ in vain are so common today that it is hardly
even shocking anymore.

Swearomaniacs are allowed to run loose everywhere in
our society filling the air with pollution as dangerous to the
soul as carbon monoxide to the body. Profanity is one of our
greatest air pollution problems. It is highly contagious, and
young people grow up becoming infected with it almost
unconsciously. When I was a chaplain at a county jail I
asked the men to think about why they swear so much.
Every one of them agreed, they picked it up as children from
their parents.
Modern novels and films spew the poisonous germs of
profanity into the stream of our consciousness at a
frightening rate. If somebody is not swearing somewhere in
a movie it is supposedly unrealistic. As a matter of fact, it is
unrealistic to portray the lives of typical people without
profanity. Anyone who works among the public is aware of
the impure vocabulary of modern man, and regrettably,
modern women also. It use to be in poor taste to swear in
the presence of a lady, but now days she is liable to beat you
to it.
Young people are exposed to profanity from every angle.
And English teacher assigned a composition to be written
containing 250 words. The next day one boy stood up to
read his, and said, "My uncle was driving his new car one
day and he had a puncture. The other 236 words are not fit
for publication." It is not likely that the teacher would let
him get by with this, but it is also true that God will not let
the uncle get by with his profanity. The Third
Commandment has a concluding statement that says, "For

the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in
vain." We are not dealing here with a trivial matter, but one
that is extremely important from God's point of view. The
Third Commandment has to be taken seriously in our day,
for it is as far from being obsolete as sunshine and oxygen in
this dark and polluted world.
The implications and applications are two numerous to
cover in one message, and so we will be limiting ourselves to
a practical explanation of what is involved. Like the
previous commandments, this one is in a negative form, but
we will see Jesus give it a positive side. Let's consider first
the negative emphasis which-
I. PROHIBITS PROFANITY OF SPEECH.
You will notice that out of ten commandments two of
them deal with sins of the tongue--this one, and the ninth,
concerning false witness. Here it is our tongue in
relationship to God, and in the ninth, it is our tongue in
relationship to man.
The first thing we need to see concerning taking the
name of God in vain is that it is a serious sin. The tendency
is to think that after all, this is a minor matter in a world
plagued by war and crime and immorality. This attitude
reveals the degree of our deception and the superficial
nature of our understanding concerning the cause of mans
depravities.

People often swear and say they mean nothing by it.
They think that eliminates them from danger, but that is the
very thing that is forbidden. To use Gods name in vain
means to use it in an empty and meaningless way. If you
mean nothing by it, you confess you have used it in vain.
We ought never to use the holy name of God except when we
mean something by it, and something worthy to be identified
with His great name. What is more empty and worthless
than men constantly asking God to damn someone or
something? Does anyone really think that God will follow
through? All they do by this empty use of God's name is
heap to themselves damnation. The person who uses God's
name in vain is saying that God is an empty meaningless
word.
All other sins are by-products of the loss of respect and
reverence for God. Once a man loses the sense of the holy
and the sacred he has broken down the only restraint that
can keep him from following his fallen nature to its logical
conclusion. If a man uses Gods name in vain, and curses
with the holy name of Christ, you can count on it that he will
also lie, steal, cheat, and do any evil he feels necessary to
accomplish his end. Nothing is sacred to a man who does
not even hold the name of God to be sacred.
God forbids in the Second Commandment that any image
be used to represent Him. God makes himself known
through His names, which reveal His power, holiness, and
purpose. To use His name in vain is a sign of contempt for
Him and His plan of salvation. Let us no longer think of

profanity as a mere minor matter, a mere social blunder, an
embarrassment. Profanity is a serious sin that leads to every
other sin by causing the swearer to lose respect for what is
right and holy. The Jews said, "Be careful, remember that
the whole world trembled when God gave the Third
Commandment." The seriousness becomes clearer if we
consider a parallel on the earthly level.
Why does the law of the land prohibit disrespect for the
flag of the United States? Is it not due to the fact that once
you permit the highest symbol of the land and its heritage to
be treated with disrespect, you open the door to every form
of disloyalty? If a man despises and treats lightly the highest
symbol of our country, then there is no end to the extent he
will go in defiance. God's name is the highest symbol of His
Person, and to use it profanely is to be guilty of an evil worse
than wiping your feet on the Stars and Stripes. Yet, we hear
it done daily without shock, offense, or rebuke. A man who
uses the name of God in vain does as much to undermine the
foundation of our freedom as a nation under God as the man
who burns the flag.
Arnold Toynbee, possibly the greatest historian of our
age, wrote, "Of the 22 civilizations that appeared in history,
nineteen of them collapsed when they reached the moral
state the United States is now in." One of the most patriotic
things American Christians can do is to make it known to
those who blindly desecrate the name of God the seriousness
of this thoughtless habit to there own souls and the future of
our land. If ever there was a Biblical truth with serious

political implications, it is this Third Commandment. People
who would never dream of spitting on the flag show the
same contempt toward the name of God. Calling their
attention to the folly of this could save them from being their
own worse enemy.
Profanity is not only a serious sin, it is a senseless sin.
Some sins against the laws of God bring a temporary gain or
satisfaction, but swearing is useless. It is all the more
offensive and damnable just because it is a sin without
temptation. All other sins appeal to some desire and lust
within us, but using God's name in vain is to be a rebel
without a cause. It is pure foolishness.
On record in the U.S. War Department is the following
general order issued by George Washington in New York,
July 1776.
“The General is sorry to be informed that the foolish
and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing, a vice
heretofore little known in an American army, is growing
into fashion. He hopes the officers will by example as well
as influence, endeavor to check it, and that both they and
the men reflect, that we can have little hope of the blessing
of Heaven on our arms, if we insult it by our impiety and
folly. Added to this, it is a vice so mean and low, without
any temptation, that every man of sense and character
detests and despises it.”
General George Washington

In this order Washington states the two points we are
considering. He says it is both serious and senseless. Robert
Kahn, a Jewish Rabbi, points out the senselessness of
profanity by describing some poor benighted souls he knows
who are so bankrupt in vocabulary that they must describe
everything by the same word. He writes, "If they wish to tell
you how fast a car was going, they say it went as fast as hell,
or if they are trying to describe how slow the car in front of
them is going, they say it was going as slow as hell.
Something as wide as hell, narrow as hell, tall as hell, short
as hell, hot as hell, cold as hell, rich as hell, poor as hell, old
as hell, young as hell. Now tell me, he concluded, isn't that
dumb as anything?" Such thoughtless profanity is
intellectual insanity.
Saying "hell" is not directly taking God's name in vain,
but it does so indirectly as does all such foolish speaking, for
it brings disrepute upon the name of God when spoken by
one professing faith in God. The New Testament says we
will have to give an account for all foolish language, and it
says that by our words we shall be justified and by our
words we shall be condemned.
The negative prohibition is for the sake of the positive
goal of a sanctified life in all areas. The most crucial area is
the area of speech, for if a man can conquer his tongue and
use it for the glory of God, the rest of his nature will also
submit. In James 3:2 we read, "If any man offend not in
word, the same is a perfect man, and able also to bridle the
whole body." Speech, therefore, is the key test of a man's

character. If it is profane, foolish, and offensive to both God
and man, you know his life and relationship to God is also a
mess. This means that the sanctified life is one where the
tongue is a servant of righteousness and a blessing to God
and man. Thus, we see the positive aspect of this command
which-
II. PROMOTES PURITY OF SPEECH:
When we go to the New Testament for the positive, it
does not mean that the Old Testament does not contain the
positive, for it does. It is an obvious conclusion to come to
that if you are not to take God's name in vain; you are to
take it reverently. In Lev. 22:32, we find the negative and
positive clearly stated together. "And you shall not profane
my holy name, but I will be hallowed among the people of
Israel." It is there in the Old Testament, but in a remote
place. Jesus, however, puts it in a conspicuous place for all
to see by making the first petition of the Lord's
Prayer--"Hallowed by Thy name."
The Christian does not fulfill the Third Commandment
by a mere negative refraining from swearing. We must
fulfill the positive goal of hallowing the name of God by
using it in a reverent, holy and fruitful manner. Silence is
not the goal, but purity of speech, which is backed up with
purity of life. The Third Commandment amounts then to a
commandment of sanctification.
The Jews finally came to see the implication of this

The ten commandments

More Related Content

The ten commandments