This document discusses biomass as a renewable energy resource for sustainable development. It provides an overview of biomass categories and potential as an energy source in different world regions and Europe. Biomass can be used to produce heat, electricity, and liquid fuels through various conversion technologies. While biomass is a sustainable resource, factors like population growth and food demand influence its availability. International agreements have promoted greater use of biomass and other renewable resources.
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 24
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Biomass Power For Energy and Sustainable Development
1. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal September/October 2008, Vol.7, No.5, 617-640
http://omicron.ch.tuiasi.ro/EEMJ/
“Gh. Asachi” Technical University of Iasi, Romania
______________________________________________________________________________________________
BIOMASS POWER FOR ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Maria Gavrilescu
”Gheorghe. Asachi” Technical University of Iaşi, Faculty of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Protection, Department
of Environmental Engineering and Management, 71 Mangeron Blvd.,700050 Iasi, Romania, e-mail: mgav@ch.tuiasi.ro
Abstract
The paper discusses some aspects concerning the utilization of biomass as a bioenergy resource worldwide and in Romania, since
biomass is considered a sustainable, potentially environmentally sound and a replenishable resource.
The biomass categories for bioenergy are analyzed, considering the factors which influence its availability. Biomass energy
potential and current use in different regions as well as in Europe is accounted. Also, biomass power as an important alternative
for providing energy in rural sector is described and some technologies for biomass conversion are evaluated briefly. Biomass and
renewable energy from biomass are considered end products, which involve new and advanced technologies to improve power
production efficiency.
It is evidenced that biomass provides a clean, renewable energy source, which could improve economic, energetic and
environmental sectors. Also, many factors converge in making bioenergy a key issue toward the achievement of the Millenium
Development Goals.
Contributions of bioenergy to sustainable development of humanity are also discussed, based on some sustainability
considerations and indicators.
The investments in biomass and bioenergy in Romania are also considered as important, since the production of renewable energy
for Romania is an important topic.
The future projection on the use of renewable energy resources points toward actions for economic development where renewable
energy from biomass will play more and more a growing role, without affecting the community food security.
Keywords: biofuel, bioelectricity, environmental impact, rural energy, renewable resources, sustainability indicators
1. Introduction various basic needs: food, feed, fuel, feedstock,
fibers, fertilizers (Rosillo-Calle, 2007). Nowadays,
Organic matter, particularly cellulosic or biomass continues to be a subject of growing
ligno-cellulosic matter is available on a renewable or significance worldwide, in particular due to its
recurring basis, including dedicated energy crops and suitability as source of bioenergy, as a result of global
trees, wood and wood residues, plants and associated increase in the demand for energy, the constant rise in
residues, agricultural food and feed crop residues, the price of fossil fuels and the need to reduce
plant fiber, aquatic plants, animal wastes, specific greenhouse gas emissions (Perlack et al., 2005;
industrial waste, the paper component of municipal Thornley and Cooper, 2008; Thornley et al., 2008;
solid waste, other waste materials, all of them being Yuan et al., 2008).
well-known as biomass. In the same context, the term Throughout the past decades, bioenergy and
biobased product is used to designate any commercial other renewable energies have been the subject of
or industrial product (either from food or feed) that several international declarations and commitments
utilizes biological products or renewable domestic on sustainable development (FAO, 2005;
agricultural (plant, animal, or marine) or forestry http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/009/j4313e.htm#
materials (ABB, 2003; Industry Report, 2008; P42_5511):
OCAPP, 2007). Both in the application in chemistry - United Nations Conference on New and
and in transport and the generation of energy, Renewable Sources of Energy (NRSE), in 1981
biomass offers great opportunities for the - United Nations Conference on Environment and
conservation of energy management (IPM, 2007). Development: in Agenda 21, emphasis was
At some stage in human history, biomass in given to the role of bioenergy
all its forms has been the most important source of - UN Millennium Declaration
2. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
- World Summit on Sustainable Development (http://www.greenjobs.com/Public/info/industry_back
(WSSD), where energy was high on the agenda ground.aspx?id=13).
- International Conference for Renewable From an ethical point of view, only biomass
Energies held in Bonn in June 2004 that is not competing with the food chain should be
- Other important initiatives promoting bioenergy used for the production of fuels, chemicals, power or
include the Global Environmental Facility heat.
(GEF), the G-8 Task Force on Renewable Industrialized countries have over 1,500
Energy; the UNDP Initiative on Energy for million hectares of crop, forest and woodland, of
Sustainable Development which some 460 million hectares are crop land.
Since the Kyoto Conference (1997), there Achieving the 15 % target could require an average of
has been an increasing interest about renewable 1.25 million hectares of crop land per year to be
energy sources and possible alternatives to fossil fuels converted to energy plantations. This represents just
that could contribute to a significantly reduction in over 2 % of the total land area in industrialized
greenhouse gas emission and enhance the overall countries (Bauen et al., 2004).
sustainability of modern society In USA, the forestry category at 49% is by
(http://www.avanzi.unipi.it/ricerca/quadro_gen_ric/bi far the largest contributor to the state biomass,
omass_bioenergy/Biomass&bioenergy_ENG.htm). followed by municipal waste with 24%, field with
Energy crops may contribute to the goals of the 14%, and animal waste at 11% as the next most
Kyoto Protocol by increasing C sequestration, thus important, respectively (Fig. 2)
playing a strategic role for development of Under this concern, biomass is a sustainable,
sustainable energy production systems. potentially environmentally sound and a replenishable
It’s obvious that the biomass energy is resource, since it can be replaced fairly quickly
nothing else than solar energy - stored thanks to without permanently depleting the Earth’s natural
photosynthesis – in the vegetable tissues. Bioenergy resources. By comparison, fossil fuels such as natural
resources take many forms, which can be broadly gas and coal require millions of years of natural
classified into three categories (Rosillo-Calle et al., processes to be produced. Alternatively, biomass can
2007): easily be grown or collected, utilized and replaced.
(1) residues and wastes, However, extracting energy from biomass is an
(2) purpose-grown energy crops ancient practice, dating back to when people first
(3) natural vegetation. burnt wood to provide heat and light. Growing
biomass is a rural, labor-intensive activity, and can,
Traditionally, conventional biomass is therefore, create jobs in rural areas and help stem
considered to come from three distinct sources: wood, rural-to-urban migration (IBEP, 2006).
waste, and alcohol fuels as summarized in the Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Biomass sources for bioenergy (adapted upon Rosillo-Calle et al., 2007)
618
3. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
Fig. 2. Biomass categories for bioenergy
Considering the factors which influence the 2. The share of biomass as renewable energy
availability of biomass for energy purposes, it can be resource
noted that the worldwide biomass system is complex
and so availability is difficult to quantify, particularly Energy is one of the more basic human
in light of the potential competition for biomass for needs and the trends in energy utilization are major
food, fodder, materials and energy (Fig. 3). indicators of the economic growth of a particular
The availability of biomass for energy will country/society. In the absence of conventional
also be influenced by population growth, diet, water energy sources, the unsustainable use of biomass
availability, agricultural density, and nature (Bringezu fuels is often the only resort. Tables 1 and 2 describe
et al., 2007; Long et al., 2006; Olesen and Bindi, the biomass energy potential in different regions of
2002; Perlack et al., 2005). Earth and in Europe, respectively (AFB-NET, 2000;
Parikka, 2006).
Fig. 3. Pathway of biomass from land to processing and end-uses for materials, food and energy (Bringezu et al., 2007)
619
4. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
Table 1. Biomass energy potential and current use in different regions, EJ/a (EJ=1018)
Biomass potential North Latin Asia Africa Europe Middle Russian World
America America East Federation
Woody biomass 12.8 5.9 7.7 5.4 4.0 0.4 5.4 41.6
Energy crops 4.1 12.1 1.1 13.9 2.6 0.0 3.6 37.4
Straw 2.2 1.7 9.9 0.9 1.6 0.2 0.7 17.2
a
Other 0.8 1.8 2.9 1.2 0.7 0.1 0.3 7.6
=Potential 19.9 21.5 21.4 21.4 8.9 0.7 10.0 103.8
(EJ/year)
Use ( EJ/year) 3.1 2.6 23.2 8.3 2.6b 0.0 0.5 39.7
Use potential (%) 16 12 108 39 29b 7 5 38
Table 2. Biomass energy potentials in Europe (PJ per year)
Forest Solid ind. Ind. Firewood Wood Densified Other Peat Total
residues by- black wastes wood fuels biomass
products liquors fuels
Austria 150.0 50.0 0.0 40.0 18.0 3.0 9.0 0.0 270.0
Belgium 7.0 13.0 8.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0
Denmark 11.0 5.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 4.0 46.0 0.0 69.0
Finland 96.0 47.0 135.0 49.0 0.0 1.0 11.0 165.0 504.0
France 38.0 42.0 0.0 258.0 111.0 0.3 412.0 0.0 861.3
Germany 142.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 81.0 0.0 511.0 0.0 774.0
Greece 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ireland 3.0 7.0 0.0 3.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 54.0
Italy 0.0 36.0 0.0 83.0 24.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 143.0
Netherlands 4.0 30 0.0 0.0 45.0 1.0 24.0 0.0 77.0
Portugal 68.0 27.0 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 117.0
Spain 59.0 87.0 23.0 12.0 52.0 0.0 386.0 0.0 619.0
1
Sweden 238.0 46.4 125.0 27.0 27.0 18.0 22.0 13.0 516.4
UK 16.0 12.0 0.0 27.0 175.0 0.0 70.0 0.0 300.0
Estonia 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.2 30.0 79.2
Latvia 8.0 12.0 0.0 32.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 15.0 68.0
Poland 101.0 68.0 16.0 26.0 40.0 0.0 205.0 122.0 578.0
Romania 0.0 23.0 3.0 58.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 84.5
Slovakia 6.0 0.1 5.0 3.0 3.0 0.1 13.0 0.0 30.2
Slovenia 2.0 7.0 0.0 8.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.1
Total 979.0 525.5 337.0 629.0 580.5 28.4 1728.3 385.0 5192.7
Leible and Kälber (2005) consider that the Biomass is available in a variety of forms
scientific dedication to bioenergy experienced three and is generally classified according to its source
stages: (animal or plant) or according to its phase (solid,
- the first stage of discussion started with the liquid or gaseous) (Bauen et al., 2004; IBEP, 2006).
1973 oil crisis and the publication of the Biomass can be burned directly or converted
Club of Rome’s report on The limits of to intermediate solid, liquid or gaseous fuels to
growth generate heat and electricity. All organic materials
- the second stage at the beginning of the can potentially be converted into useful forms of
1980s was a discussion on reducing energy but the advantage of modern biomass-to-
agricultural overproduction and creating electricity systems is that these conversion systems
income in agriculture by growing energy can cope with a range of lignocellulose-rich materials.
crops. This is in contrast to liquid biofuel production chains
- the third stage started at the end of the that are primarily dependent on sugar, starch or oil-
1980s, which continues today, triggered by rich crops, typically annuals. The options for biomass
increasing efforts for the mitigation of conversion to energy re described below.
climate change and not only. There are three ways of using the biomass
Using biomass to generate energy has resources, which represent the bioenergy sector
positive environmental implications and creates a (EREC, 2007; IBEP, 2006):
great potential to contribute considerably more to the - biomass for heating purposes (bio-heating),
renewable energy sector, particularly when converted - biomass for electricity production (bio-
to modern energy carriers such as electricity and electricity),
liquid and gaseous fuels (IBEP, 2006; - biomass for transport fuels (transportation
http://www.unido.org/index.php?id=4781). biofuels).
620
5. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
All these processes enable to take profit of to a minor extent, in combined heat and power (CHP)
the CO2 mitigation potential of biomass. Since applications (Parikka, 2006) (Fig. 5). Biomass is
biomass is the result of storing sun light as chemical expected to cover as much as 8% of the total EU
energy in plants through photosynthesis, when energy supply in 2010 (Parikka, 2006).
sunlight transforms CO2 from the atmosphere and
water into complex plant polymers over short periods
of time, the use of this resource as a material or
durable product keeps the CO2 stored. The CO2
released is equivalent to the amount of CO2 absorbed
by the biomass (photosynthesis) in the growing phase
(Wiedinmyer and Neff, 2007).
Practically, the equivalent of 10 to 30% of
the energy content of the raw biomass is used in
cropping, transport, conversion and upgrading. This
amount of energy can partially come from the
biomass itself, which makes the overall CO2-balance
nearly neutral (Yamasaki, 2003). Therefore, biomass
can substantially contribute to reach the targets of the
Fig. 5. Structure of energy consumption in European Union
Kyoto protocol and to reduce long-term greenhouse state members in 2002 (EIA, 2003; Eurostat, 2007)
gas emissions (IBEP, 2006; Kashianet al., 2006;
Wiedinmyer and Neff, 2007). Also, the share of electricity generated in EU
In European Union, renewable energies from renewable sources relative to gross national
come mainly from biomass and waste, representing electricity consumption was situated at almost 14% in
almost 72 million tons of primary production in 2004 2004, but several of the Member States showed much
(UNEP, 2007). Primary production of renewable higher ratios (Austria: 59 %, Sweden: 46 %)
energy: primary production of biomass, hydropower, (EUROSTAT, 2007). However, the weight of
geothermal energy, wind and solar energy are biomass and waste in the primary production of
included in renewable energies (Fig. 4) (EUROSTAT, production of renewable energy is not too high,
2007). In Germany, bioenergy produced an overall comparative with that of wind, for example (Fig. 6)
turnover of €3.5 billion in 2004, without (EUROSTAT, 2007).
consideration of the fuel-provision businesses. For Some 40 to 50 exajoules (EJ = 1018 joules)
comparison, the largest German energy company per year of biomass is used for energy today out of
E.ON AG achieved a transaction volume of €49.1 some 400 EJ per year of total global energy use
billion in the same year (EON, 2005; Plieninger et al., (Kartha and Larson, 2000). In order to compare
2006); €1.6 billion was invested in the construction of various scales of using biomass as a renewable
bioenergy plants, while €1.9 billion turnover came resource, some data are given in Table 3
from operation and maintenance (BMU, 2005; (http://lib.kier.re.kr/common/tech/tech017/bio05.pdf).
Plieninger et al., 2006). As is suggested by the data from Table 3,
biomass power became very important. It is appraised
that biomass is the second-largest renewable source
of electricity after hydropower, providing the
baseload power to utilities. Various energy scenarios
simulate high share of biomass energy in the future
energy mixture.
Several scenarios of energy evolution
worldwide indicate that biomass has the potential to
contribute 25%-50% of the present global energy, up
to 2050 (Hall et al., 2000; Hoogwijk et al., 2003).
Shell International Petroleum Co. scenario
calculations (1994-1996) indicate certain conditions
in which new biomass sources could contribute 45%-
Fig. 4. Primary production of renewable energy in 50%.
European Union (2004, % of total, based on 1000 tonnes of Hoogwijk et al., (2003) studied the potential
oil equivalent) (Eurostat, 2007) availability of primary biomass for energy and found
that it is influenced by:
Biomass is the biggest contributor (65%) to 1) the demand for food as a function of
renewable energy sources, which represented 6% population and diet consumed;
from energy consumption in 2002 (EIA, 2003; 2) the food production system that can be
EUROSTAT, 2007; Parikka, 2006) (Fig. 5). Energy adopted worldwide, taken into account the water and
from biomass already contributes to about 4% of the nutrient availability;
total EU energy supply, for the most part in heat, and
621
6. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
Fig. 6. The weight of different renewable energy sources in the total production of renewable energy in EU countries (1994 is the
basis of reference, based on tones of oil equivalent) (Eurostat, 2007)
3) productivity of forest and energy crops; 3. Conversion of biomass into energy
4) other competing options for land-use like for nature
development. Biomass energy has the potential to be
Biomass utilization in developing countries modernized worldwide, i.e., produced and converted
contrasts severely with biomass use in developed efficiently and cost-competitively into more
countries, where fuelwood and charcoal remain the convenient forms such as gases, liquids, or electricity
dominant energy source for most households (IBEP, (IBEP, 2006; Larson and Katha, 2000). Modern
2006; Kammen et al., 2003). Wood energy is also biomass now represents only 3% of primary energy
becoming an increasingly important industrial energy consumption in industrialized countries, and this
option in the industrialized countries of Western value has remained steady over recent years.
Europe, Asia and the Pacific and North America, as it However, much of the rural population in developing
is based on locally available, renewable and countries, which represents about 50% of the world’s
environmentally friendly raw material (IBEP, 2006). population are reliant on traditional biomass, mainly
in the form of wood for fuel.
Table 3. Energy equivalent of various energy resources Traditional biomass accounts for 35% of
worldwide primary energy consumption in developing countries,
raising the world total to 14% of primary energy
Source Energy equivalent
consumption
(exajoule, EJ)
(1EJ = 1018 joules) (http://www.rise.org.au/info/Res/biomass/index.html
All cereals worldwide 31.3 Biomass power is an important alternative
All merchantable boles 14.3 for providing energy in the rural sector. The inherent
Fuel wood and charcoal used advantages in utilization of biomass are that
primarily in developing 15.3 employment opportunities are created even for
countries cultivation, collection, transportation and storage of
Usable portion of the current 60.9 biomass.
biomass In evaluating biomass energy chains, it is
clear that simple cost-benefit analysis does not
In a report of UNEP it is shown that, on capture a range of ‘external’ costs and benefits that
average, biomass accounts for 3 or 4 percent of total arise from the supply of energy services. Fig. 7
energy use in the poor areas, although in countries provides a schematic representation of biomass fuel
with policies that support biomass use (e.g., Sweden, chains (Bauen et al., 2004).
Finland, and Austria), the biomass contribution The technologies for biomass conversion
reaches 15 to 20 percent (Kartha and Larson, 2000). mainly consist in: direct combustion processes,
Most biomass in industrialized countries is converted thermochemical processes, biochemical processes
into electricity and process heat in cogeneration and agrochemical processes (Demirbas, 2001; IBEP,
systems (combined heat and power production) at 2006).
industrial sites or at municipal district heating EPA (2007) classifies technologies for
facilities biomass conversion into inert gases and organic oils,
(http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~kammen/er120/ER120_ gases, and fuels that can be further used to yield
L3-BiomassEnergy_for_web.pdf). desired energy products as follows:
622
7. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
Fig. 7. The chains of biomass fuel (Bauen et al., 2004).
- thermochemical technologies: biomass solid biomass into clean, convenient energy carriers
feedstocks is converted using high temperatures (Demirbas, 2001; Kaltschmitt and Weber M., 2006;
to energy, typically in the form of electricity http://www.esmeet.org/journal3.html).
and heat. However, the technologies have the Most of these technologies are already in
potential to produce electricity, heat, commercial use, although some more than others.
bioproducts, and fuels; Each technology description - gasification, anaerobic
- biochemical technologies: biological agents digestion, ethanol, steam turbine, and gas turbine -
convert biomass to energy (liquid and gaseous includes a general discussion of key technical issues
fuels). that must be addressed in any project involving these
- chemical technologies: chemical agents are technologies. It also includes more detailed technical
used to convert biomass feedstocks to energy, discussion of basic operating principles, feedstock
typically in the form of liquid fuels. and other material input requirements, operating and
These three biomass conversion maintenance issues, capital and operating costs,
technologies may also produce byproducts that can environmental issues, and other factors.
be valuable biobased products (EPA, 2007). Table 4
lists a variety of technologies, which can convert
Table 4. Some actual technologies for conversion of biomass in energy (Demirbas, 2001)
Technology Scale Energy services provided
Biogas Small - Electricity (local pumping, mining, lighting, communication,
refrigeration, etc. and possible distribution via utility grid)
- Cooking
- Heating
Producer gas Small to medium - Electricity (local pumping, mining, lighting, communication,
refrigeration, etc. and possible distribution via utility grid)
- Cooking
- Heating
Ethanol Medium to large - Vehicle transportation
- Cooking
Steam turbine Medium to large - Electricity (for industrial processing and grid distribution)
- Heating process heat
Gas turbine Medium to large - Electricity (for industrial processing and grid distribution)
- Heating process heat
623
8. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
The research and development of the new much slower than that of many European Union
technology of biomass energy, such as the research of countries. Germany has an average annual growth
highly efficient and low cost conversion and rate of 22.7% (reaching 1986 GWh in 2001), Italy of
application of biomass energy, the making of 55.3% (684 GWh) and France of 19.8% (601 GWh)
liquefied oils at normal pressure by fast liquefaction, since 1992. Most of the growth in the biogas segment
the research of the technology of catalytic chemical has taken place in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and
transformation and equipment for the transformation continued strong growth is expected for the near
of biomass energy as well as fluidized gasification future.
techniques are the focuses of research.
4.2. Liquid biofuels
4. Biofuels from biomass
Liquid biofuels have gained importance in
Biomass fuels in their unprocessed form the last decades in Latin America, and more recently
comprise wood, straw, animal dung, vegetable matter, in Europe and other countries of the Organisation for
agricultural waste, while processed biomass includes Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),
methane, charcoal, sawdust and alcohol produced particularly in the transport sector (IBEP, 2006).
from fermentation processes. In developing countries In the late 1990s and early 2000s, liquid
they can account for 35%, on average, of primary biofuels grew in European Union from 7TJ in 1990 to
energy needs, while in some other areas, this rises to almost 7,400TJ in 2002
as much as 90% with marked effect on the (http://www.greenjobs.com/Public/info/industry_back
environment ground.aspx?id=13). Today, biomass is the only
(http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2006/june/biomass. available renewable energy source that can produce
htm; IBEP, 2006). competitive fuels for transport in larger quantities
Using biomass to generate heat or to drive (Parikka, 2006). The biomass resources considered
steam engines is not new. But old-fashioned methods as well as their classification based on fuel quality
of burning wood, field residues, or waste were not and conversion technology are presented in Table 5
environmentally sound because they emitted polluting (Nikolaou et al., 2003).
smoke and volatile organic compounds into the air Liquid biofuels cover biogasoline and biodiesels:
(Bauen et al., 2004; DOE, 2000). Today, scientists Biogasoline: this category includes
and engineers use improved processes to develop bioethanol (ethanol produced from biomass and/or the
several new methods that cleanly and efficiently biodegradable fraction of waste), biomethanol
convert biomass to electricity. One new method uses (methanol produced from biomass and/or the
biomass to replace a portion of the coal used to fuel a biodegradable fraction of waste), bioETBE
power plant through cofiring. (ethyltertio-butyl-ether produced on the basis of
The cost of biomass fuel supply depends on bioethanol: the percentage by volume of bioETBE
the cost of producing or recovering the ‘feedstock’ – that is calculated as biofuel is 47%) and bioMTBE
raw materials – and those incurred during its transport (methyl-tertio-butyl-ether produced on the basis of
and pre-processing prior to use in a power biomethanol: the percentage by volume of bioMTBE
plant. that is calculated as biofuel is 36 %).
Liquid biofuels cover biogasoline and
4.1. Biogas biodiesels:
Biogasoline: this category includes
Biogas can provide a clean, easily controlled bioethanol (ethanol produced from biomass and/or the
source of renewable energy from organic waste biodegradable fraction of waste), biomethanol
materials replacing firewood or fossil fuels. (methanol produced from biomass and/or the
Biogas primary energy production grew biodegradable fraction of waste), bioETBE
from virtually zero in 1992 to surpass renewable (ethyltertio-butyl-ether produced on the basis of
municipal wastes in 2002. Electricity production from bioethanol: the percentage by volume of bioETBE
biogas grew from an estimated 5,000 GWh in 1990 to that is calculated as biofuel is 47%) and bioMTBE
13,617 GWh in 2001 (IEA, 2007). While in the early (methyl-tertio-butyl-ether produced on the basis of
1990’s, nearly the entire amount of biogas electricity biomethanol: the percentage by volume of bioMTBE
was produced in the United States, the largest that is calculated as biofuel is 36 %).
proportion of this production has moved to OECD Biodiesels: this category includes biodiesel
Europe, which contributes 58.1% of biogas electricity (a methyl-ester produced from vegetable or animal
today. Therefore, most production takes place in the oil, of diesel quality), biodimethylether
member countries of the European Union. The largest (dimethylether produced from biomass), Fischer
producer in the European Union is the United Tropsch (Fischer Tropsch produced from biomass),
Kingdom, which provided 2,870 GWh of biogas cold pressed bio-oil (oil produced from oil seed
electricity in 2001. While the United States, with through mechanical processing only) and all other
4,860 GWh, remains the largest individual producer, liquid biofuels which are added to, blended with or
its growth of 5.4% per annum since 1992 has been used straight as transport diesel.
624
9. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
Table 5. Classification of the biomass fuel resources under study (Nikolaou et al., 2003).
Sector Resource Fuel category Fuel quality (indicative) Conversion
technology
Moisture Ash content (%
content (% wet dry basis)
basis)
Agricultural Dry lignocellulosic 30-50 2.2-17 Combustion,
residues (e.g. straw, gasification,
pruning) liquefaction
Livestock waste Wet cellulosic 74-92.1 27.1-35.4 digestion
Agriculture Dry lignocellulosic 75 17.5-28 Combustion,
(e.g. poultry litter) gasification,
liquefaction
Energy crops Dry lignocellulosic 12.5-50 0.3-8.4 Combustion,
gasification,
liquefaction
Oil seeds for na <0.02 Extraction
methylesters
Sugar/starch crops na <0.02 Fermentation
for ethanol
Forestry Wood fuel Dry lignocellulosic 46.7 0.4-5 Combustion,
gasification,
liquefaction
Forest residues Dry lignocellulosic 46.7 3.2 Combustion,
gasification,
liquefaction
Industry Dry lignocellulosic 10-30 0.71-18.34 Combustion,
Industrial residues gasification,
liquefaction
Wet cellulosic 80-99 3.8-5.9 digestion
Black liquor 90 36.4 combustion
Waste Regulated waste Municipal waste 30 36 combustion
Demolition wood 30-40 0.58 combustion
Non- regulated Landfill waste 30 36 Digestion
waste Sewage sludge 72.8 26.4 digestion
Parks and Urban wood Dry lignocellulosic 35 39.4 Combustion,
gardens gasification,
liquefaction
Cut grass Wet cellulosic 75-80 8.4 digestion
Liquid biofuels grew from 7TJ in 1990 to (http://themes.eea.europa.eu/Sectors_and_activities/e
almost 7400TJ in 2002 and represented about 1.5% in nergy/indicators/EN30,2007.04).
total fuel consumption for transport (Germany, in Worldwide, electricity production benefited during
2004) (Fig. 8, Eurostat, 2007). The price range is the last decade from the rise in importance of new
dependent upon plant scale and efficiency factors. renewable electricity production industrial sectors
Also, the price of biofuels is dependent on the source (wind power, biomass, geothermal energy and solar
(Fig. 9). The average price for biofuels in Europe energy).
varies between 1.0 €/GJ (recovered wood) to 8.4 €/GJ While they only represented 11% of
(densified biofuels). renewable electricity in 2006, these sectors (new by
their degree of industrialization) have contributed
5. Renewable electricity from biomass 29.3% of the increase in renewable electricity
production between 1996 and 2006 (228.5 TWh out
Electricity generation from biomass fuels of a total of 779.6 TWh). Their share in total
currently uses the same basic technology used in electricity production gained 0.9 points between 1996
power plants that burn solid fossil fuels. However, and 2006 (from 1.2% to 2.1%), while that of
new technologies are being developed to improve hydraulic power lost 2.3 points (from 18.9% to
power production efficiency from biomass. 16.6%). The share of renewable energy in EU-25
The electricity directive (2001/77/EC) electricity consumption grew only slightly over the
defines renewable electricity as the share of period 1990-2004 to reach 13.7%, despite a
electricity produced from renewable energy sources substantial increase in the total amount of renewable
in gross electricity consumption electricity generation (up by 49 % since 1990) (Fig.
10).
625
10. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
Fig. 8. Share of biofuels in total fuel consumption for transport in 2004
Fig. 9. Average price for biofuels in Europe (Eurostat, 2007)
Fig. 10. Renewable electricity as a percentage of gross electricity consumption, 2004
626
11. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
In 2001 about 33,379 GWh of electricity the studies examined the air, land and water impacts
were produced from renewable solid waste in the of every step of the bioenergy process, from
OECD. By far the largest producer of electricity from cultivating, collecting, and transporting biomass to
renewable municipal solid waste is the United States, converting it to energy
generating 16,818 GWh, or 50.4% of OECD (http://www.azocleantech.com/Details.asp?ArticleId=
production. The second largest producer is Japan, 87).
with a production of 5,338 GWh. With 2,044 GWh, Fig. 11 provides a diagram which indicates
Germany represents the third largest producer. The some of the process steps that should be included in
remaining electricity production from renewable LCA calculation, the emissions or energy requirement
municipal solid waste is spread among smaller associated with each process step (Rowe et al., 2008).
producers in OECD Europe. Denmark and Italy In addition, very different impacts are likely to arise
experienced the highest growth rates, increasing their depending on which category
production from 47 GWh to 1,068 GWh (at 32.8% of biomass feedstock is used and which technologies
per year) and from 71 GWh to 1,258 GWh (at 29.9% are used to convert the biomass to useful energy.
per year) respectively between 1990 and 2001 (IEA, Contamination with non-biomass or modified
2002). biomass streams also represents a particular problem
Bauen et al. (2004) estimated that as, even in very small quantities; these contaminants
bioelectricity, excluding municipal solid waste to can lead to measurable toxic emissions and health
electricity, today represents a very small fraction of hazards. The production of bioenergy on the basis of
world electricity production, about 30 GW residual products such as straw, slurry, animal fat,
representing about 1 % of installed capacity, but has a grass and perennial crops provides a better energy
very strong potential for growth. Its growth will be balance and environmental effect when used in direct
driven by the need to increase the use of renewable combustion, biogas or thermal gasification.
energy sources for electricity production to ensure The development of biomass resources and
sustainable production of electricity. the conservation of biodiversity and local
By factoring in the pollution-related environments can go hand in hand. The biomass
environmental and social costs generated by fossil production has several environmental advantages,
and nuclear fuels, bioelectricity became a very including: substituting fossil fuel use with a CO2-
competitive energy source. neutral alternative; reducing emissions of other
atmospheric pollutants, such as sulphur; protecting
6. Impacts of biomass conversion to energy soil and watersheds; increasing or maintaining
biodiversity: and reducing fire risk in forestry (Bauen
6.1. Overall environmental impacts et al., 2004).
Biomass energy systems have a wide range of
Biomass provides a clean, renewable energy potential socioeconomic and environmental
source that could dramatically improve the impacts—both positive and negative. Such impacts
environment, economy and energy security. The use are often treated as only "secondary" effects in the
of biomass for energy has effects on all the planning and implementation of energy projects, even
environmental media i.e. soil, water and air. In though they can greatly influence whether a project is
addition, these effects may have impacts on human appropriate and sustainable in the local context.
and animal health and welfare, soil quality, water use, Biomass energy generates far less air
biodiversity and public amenity. These impacts arise emissions than fossil fuels, reduces the amount of
from each of the individual stages of the biomass waste sent to landfills. Energy derived from biomass
energy fuel chains (Bauen et al., 2004; results is potentially greenhouse neutral, because the
http://www.fvm.dk/Environmental_impacts.aspx?ID= carbon dioxide released by combustion was taken out
19789). of the atmosphere as the biomass grew. Carbon
Although there is a large body of research in dioxide emissions could be cut by around 1,000
this area, the environmental costs and benefits megatonnes per year, if OECD countries used
associated with bioenergy can be difficult to assess biomass - fuel generated from agriculture and forest
because of the complexity of the production systems. products - instead of coal to generate electricity
One technique which has been used extensively in the (Bauen et al., 2004; Perlack et al., 2005).
literature to compare the energy and greenhouse gases Biodiesel, produced from vegetable oil, can substitute
balances of bioenergy chains is life cycle assessment for fossil-diesel in transport and heating and
(LCA), an internationally recognised technique for electricity generation.
evaluating the natural resource requirements and Biofuels such as biodiesel, ethanol and
environmental impacts from the whole process and methanol, can be a greenhouse-neutral, renewable
materials involved in the manufacture of a product or energy source for use in transport vehicles, stationary
service (Rowe, 2008). engines, and small electricity generators.
Several studies examined the life-cycle Biomass electricity is potentially greenhouse
impact of bioenergy for power (Carpentieri et al., neutral if produced from biomass such as plantation
2005; Heller et al., 2004; Rowe et al., 2008). That is, fuel-wood.
627
12. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
Fig. 11. Diagram of emissions breakdown for heat and power production, necessary for each bioenergy chain (Rowe et al., 2008)
Modernized bioenergy systems have unless there is sufficiently effective environmental
environmental impacts associated both with the regulation of this, for example in the form of demands
growing of the biomass and with its conversion to for extensive land cultivation (Bauen et al., 2004).
modern energy carriers. Significant impact is The use of perennial crops, where they
expected from bioenergy with respect to mitigation of replace annual crops, will result in reduced oil
climate change, development of rural areas and disturbance, greater soil cover and hence lower
employment options as well as the provision of erosion, improved soil organic matter and soil carbon
alternative energy forms. levels and increased biodiversity, particularly where
However, the environmental impact induced the change results in a decreased application of inputs
by using biomass as a source of fuel varies according (fertilizers and pesticides) (Bauen et al., 2004).
to the type of conversion technology. Also, plants can selectively and actively
absorb toxins, including heavy metals and ash
6.2. Impact on soil recycling could cause such toxins to be concentrated
in the bioenergy plantation’s soils. This characteristic
Environmental impacts of biomass of certain plant species to selectively absorb toxins is
production must be viewed in comparison to the sometimes used to rehabilitate polluted soils in a
likely alternative land-use activities. For example, at process known as phytoremediation.
the local or regional level, the relative impacts of Sometimes, the feedstock’s nutrient content
producing bioenergy feedstocks depends not only on can be recovered from the conversion facility in the
how the biomass is produced, but also on how the form of ash or sludge and then converted into a form
land would have been used otherwise. that can be applied to the field rather than put in a
Biomass crops pose a particular challenge landfill, so that the nutritive value of the ash or sludge
for good soil management because the plant material is less than optimal (Kartha, 2006).
is often completely harvested, leaving little organic Soil organic matter and nutrient levels have
matter or plant nutrients for recycling back into the to be maintained or even improved where bioenergy
soil (Kartha, 2006). Increasing the production of production is to be based on exploiting agricultural
biomass involves a risk of growing pressure on and forestry residues. In many cases, farmers can
biodiversity and of increased leaching of nutrients reduce the risk of nutrient depletion by allowing the
628
13. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
most nutrient-rich parts of the plant—small branches, Some studies found that biomass gasification
twigs, and leaves—to decompose on the field. Also, with combined-cycle power plant technology would
monitoring may be required to ensure that. release far less SO2, NOx, CO2, particulate matter,
methane and carbon monoxide than coal power plants
6.3. Impact on water (ABA, 2005; Perlack et al., 2005; REPP, 2006;).
The assessment of direct environmental 7. Bioenergy and sustainable development
impacts of energy from biomass for energy for water
mainly envisages the following aspects (Bauen et al., 7.1. Biomass energy systems and linkages to
2004; Moret et al., 2006): absolute and relative sustainable human development
consumption; reuse (consumption/unit produced);
discharge of effluents and infiltration; monitoring of The progress of any nation today is
contamination by fertilizers, herbicides and measured in terms of its efforts towards the
insecticides; turbidity; eutrophication; suspended achievement of the Millennium Development Goals
solid particles; environmental suitability of (MDGs). Many factors converge in making bioenergy
technology used to extract water; use of best available a key component and a viable opportunity in the great
irrigation practices; groundwater depletion; effort towards the achievement of the Millennium
restoration of groundwater etc. Development Goals (MDGs). Although the
The use of perennial crops and no-till buffer sustainable access to energy is not treated as a priority
zones along water courses is already being actively in itself in the MDGs, most of them have a direct
considered as a cost effective method for reducing energy implication, particularly Goal 1 (Eradicate
chemical and biological oxygen demand (COD and extreme poverty and hunger) and Goal 7 (Ensure
BOD) levels in agricultural water courses. environmental sustainability) (FAO, 2005).According
There may also be negative impacts from the to the WSSD Johannesburg Declaration, energy must
introduction of energy crops on local and regional be considered a human need on a par with other basic
hydrology, because a significant increase in the human needs (clean water, sanitation, shelter, health
interception and use of rainfall could result from a care, food security and biodiversity) (ESC, 2007;
wide spread implementation, with potentially IBEP, 2006)
substantial reductions in rainfall infiltration and The assessment of the sustainability of
negative impacts of aquifers in the region (Bauen et energy supply from firewood and other forms of plant
al., 2004; Lyons et al., 2001). Certain practices, like biomass has changed greatly since the problems of a
harvesting residues, cultivating tree crops without strong dependency on fossil energy carriers have
undergrowth, and planting species that do not come to the forefront (IAEA, 2005; Otto, 2007;
generate adequate amounts or types of litter, can Sheehan, 2004; Sims, 2003). Fig. 12 provides a
reduce the ability of rainfall to infiltrate the soil and conceptual representation of bioenergy systems, as
restock groundwater supplies, intensifying problems addressed by United Nations Development
of water overconsumption (Kartha, 2006). Programme, in the context of sustainable human
development (Kartha and Larson, 2000).
6.4. Impact on atmosphere The socio-economic and environmental
benefits of bioenergy projects are accepted by
The contribution that biomass could make to planners and operators of development programmes
the energy sector is still considerable, since it creates in forestry, agriculture and energy domains
less carbon dioxide than its fossil-fuel counterpart. (http://www.spatial.baltic.net/_files/Planning_indicat
The utilization of biomass is often presented ors.pdf). Also they are recognizing and are now
as a key strategy for reducing greenhouse gases seeing bioenergy as a way to reduce poverty and
(GHG) emissions from electricity generation and improve livelihoods in rural areas, overcoming the
transport. Using biomass potentially provides low negative perception of bioenergy as a key symptom of
carbon transport fuel, heat and power, as biomass under-development or an environmental hazard.
crops assimilate carbon from the atmosphere during Bioenergy projects contribute to the eradication of
growth. Therefore, the carbon released back to the extreme poverty and to ensure environmental
atmosphere when the biomass is combusted is that sustainability in several aspects highlighted in Table 6
which has been recently captured and should not raise (FAO, 2005).
atmospheric concentrations.
Burning biomass will not solve the currently 7.2. Sustainable biomass use for energy
unbalanced carbon dioxide problem. Conceptually,
the carbon dioxide produced by biomass when it is Concerns about potential negative effects of
burned will be sequestered evenly by plants growing large-scale biomass production and export, like
to replace the fuel. In other words, it is a closed cycle deforestation or the competition between food and
which results in net zero impact biomass production, have led to the demand for
(http://www.azocleantech.com/Details.asp?ArticleId= sustainability criteria and certification systems that
87). can control biomass trade (IAEA, 2005;
Lewandowski and Faaij, 2006; Sheehan, 2004).
629
14. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
Fig. 12. Conceptual representation of biomass energy systems and linkages to sustainable human development
Table 6. Contributions of bioenergy to sustainability (FAO, 2005)
Sustainability component How does bioenergy contribute to MDG achievement
Economics - save external currencies through the substitution of imported fossil fuels
- leads to improved economic development and poverty alleviation, especially in rural areas by
increasing the use of biomass for energy (from sustainable resource management)
- provide greater diversification and income opportunities for agriculture, agro-industries and
forestry
- increase the access of small rural industries to energy services
- enhance the value of rural resources, encouraging private and public sector participation and
investments
- boost national energy security and reduce the oil import bill
Social development - increase both access to and reliability of energy services for households in rural areas, thus
improving the quality of life
stimulate governance options, equity and gender equality, especially in view of women's central
role in household energy management
- attracts investments towards rural areas, generating new business opportunities for small-and
medium-sized enterprises in biofuel production, preparation, transportation, trade and use, and
generates incomes (and jobs) for the people living in and around these areas
- bioelectricity production has the highest employment-creation potential among renewable
energy options
- bioenergy can be a lever for rural development and regeneration in areas where investment is
most needed and the creation of jobs is most difficult
- indicators of social accountability include
participation of representatives of socio-environmental organizations; participation of the
communities as decision-makers and not only being consulted; the degree of inclusion of the local
population in the project design, and knowledge of the proposal and the alternatives.
Environment reduced indoor air pollution from wood energy combustion in poor households associated to the
characteristics of cooking devices with positive impacts
resource conservation and ecosystem rehabilitation (through sustainable biomass production in
marginal lands
reduced CO2 emissions by using cleaner fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel
To ensure that biomass as a source of sustainable development in order to identify such
renewable sustainable energy will be produced and indicators. Minimum criteria for bioenergy
processed in a responsible manner, some sustainability envisage the following aspects (Cramer,
sustainability criteria have to be incorporated into the 2006; Sheehan, 2004):
relevant policy instruments. - comply with present international obligations and
Chapter 40 of Agenda 21 calls for the local jurisdiction, in addition to other specific
development of indicators for sustainable indicators.
development. In particular, it requests countries at the - comply with specific indicators and active
national level, and international governmental and conservation.
non-governmental organizations at the international Some criteria and indicators of sustainability
level to develop the concept of indicators of for the generation of renewable energy from biomass
630
15. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
discussed within the Energy Working Group of criteria – basic criteria applicable to any type of
FBOMS, in an attempt to contextualize and deepen initiative - and specific criteria - for projects that
the national and international debate about future involve the use of bioenergy (Moret et al., 2006).
initiatives, in a participatory and engaged manner are
presented in Table 7. It synthesizes both the general
Table 7. Criteria and indicators for sustainability (Moret et al., 2006).
Criteria Desirable and Prerequisites Indicators
Economic
Use of bioenergy Creating more efficient transport systems Rates of reduction of consumption
Promotion of energy efficiency Increased end-use conservation
Capacity for reduction, reuse and recycling
of inputs in the final activities for which the
energy is destined
Inclusion of demand management in the
project planning horizon
Technology Decentralized generation and production Relation between local workers and
Technology appropriation by local population outsiders involved in project maintenance
New technology capable of reducing pressure of Application of clean technologies
energy production on ecosystems Technological innovation
Horizontal transfer of technologies and Capacity of reproduction of technology used
knowledge Origin of equipment
Contribution to diversification of energy matrix Existence of technology licences
Need for international technical support
Changes in use of sustainable energy,
cogeneration
Organization of Cooperatives Sharing of profits from biofuels production
production/labor Family agriculture chain by family farmers
relations Level of satisfaction with existing contracts
Financing Credits, access to land Programs and lines of credit
Conditions for government financing
Social
Social Information and capacity building Participation of local population and
accountability national socio-environmental organizations
in projects design
Participation in Information and training, political forums for Number, sites, nature and types of
decision making participation with real influence over decisions consultations, form of publicity, access to
information, language and accessibility of
material used
Type of management Training for management Organizational structures and forms of
decision-making, number of
participants/decision makers, involvement
of organizations representing local workers,
participation of women
Number of jobs per unit of energy
Job creation and Training for creation of cooperatives, awareness (production chain, implementation and
income generation and training of families with technical and operation), profit sharing, generation of new
political information local opportunities and sources of income,
relation between local jobs before and after
the project, indexes of increase in
acquisitive power of the local population
631
16. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
Social inclusion Sharing of project benefits with local population Number of families previously without
access to energy who benefit from the
project
Measures of quality and compliance with
accepted standards of the involuntary
resettlements, when necessary and accepted
Impact on quality life of the communities
Social programmes, especially for health
and education
Epidemiological assessment and monitoring
Contribution to access to services and
infrastructure on the part of local
populations to education, energy, waste and
sewage services
Gender equality Recognition of women and key actors in all stages Existence of programs and policies for
of decision-making processes women and youth
Education
Environment
Environmental Use of best available practices Monoculturea area
management Diversity of crops Soil loss
Agroforestry systems Atmospheric emissions and effluents into
Agroecology water bodies
Minimizationor elimination of pesticide use
Reduction of soil loss
Training of producers
Land use Comply with economic/ecological zoning Decentralization and diversification of
Regions classified as suitable by strategic production system in an area/region
environmental assessment Sizes of continuous areas of monocultures
Defined limits for occupation of biomass Distance from energy source to consumer
Diversification and decentralization of economic Distance traveled and time spent by workers
activities to project area
Protection of natural areas Time necessary to manage crops
Otto (2007) retains a set of internationally - fifth, methods to formulate indicators, that make
agreed criteria, such as: sustainability criteria measurable, and verifiers
- wide acceptance to avoid shifting the problem that are used to control the performance of
from one area to another indicators are described.
- ease of reference The Project Group established by Dutch
- cost government (IPM, 2007) has formulated
- international trade sustainability criteria for the production and the
- complemented by regional/national protocols processing of biomass in energy, fuels and chemistry.
- taking into account specificities The project group distinguishes six relevant themes
Lewandowski and Faaij (2006) have concerning bioenergy sustainability:
analyzed existing certification systems, sets of - greenhouse gas emissions (calculated over the
sustainability criteria or guidelines on environmental whole chain, the use of biomass must produce
or social sound management of resources with the fewer emissions of greenhouse gases net than
purpose to learn about the requirements, contents and on average with fossil fuel)
organizational set ups of a certification system for - competition with food and other local
sustainable biomass trade, by covering the following applications (the production of biomass for
successive steps: energy must not endanger the food supply and
- first, an inventory of existing systems was made; other local applications (such as for medicines
- second, their structures were analyzed and key or building materials)
finding from the analysis of internationally - biodiversity (biomass production must not
applied certification systems were summarized; affect protected or vulnerable biodiversity and
- third and fourth steps: different approaches to will, where possible, have to strengthen
formulate standards were described and a list of biodiversity)
more than 100 social, economic, ecological and - environment (biomass production must not
general criteria for sustainable biomass trade was affect protected or vulnerable biodiversity and
extracted from the reviewed systems; will, where possible, have to strengthen
biodiversity)
632
17. Biomass power for energy and sustainable development
- prosperity (the production of biomass must 2008). Many rural areas are growing and
contribute towards local prosperity) experiencing increasing energy demand. Smaller
- social well-being (the production of biomass facilities have fewer environmental impacts and can
must contribute towards the social well-being operate with locally produced biomass fuel. Using
of the employees and the local population). biomass delivers a triple benefit by keeping the
wealth nearby, paying farmers to grow and harvest
8. Rural areas and bioenergy biomass feedstocks, and providing clean energy. The
national benefits include lower sulfur emissions
Using biomass, such as energy crops, crop (which contribute to acid rain), reductions in
processing waste, and agricultural residues, to greenhouse gas emissions, and less dependence on
produce energy is beneficial for the nation, especially fossil fuels. Rural benefits feature new sources of
rural areas: job creation, rural development and income for farmers, more jobs, and economic
development of local economies through the use of development—all achieved while preserving the high
bioenergy (Domac, 2002; Hillring, 2002; Plieninger quality of life, local control, and clean environment.
et al., 2006; Sims, 2003). Bioenergy feedstocks can be produced in
Rural areas can better serve as indicator for conjunction with other local necessities—food,
measuring any progress made towards achieving fodder, fuelwood, construction materials, artisan
MDGs. Increasing the use of biomass for energy materials, other agricultural crops, etc. Feedstock
(from sustainable resource management) leads to production can help restore the environment on which
improved economic development, and poverty the poor depend for their livelihoods—re-vegetating
alleviation, especially in rural areas. barren land, protecting watersheds and harvesting
The OECD definition, taking into account rainwater (Møller, 2006; UNEP, 2006). Bioenergy
population density at the local level, considers as activities also serve as an efficient use for agricultural
rural those local government units with less than 150 residues, avoiding the pest, waste, and pollution
inhabitants/km2. Then it identifies three categories of problems of residue disposal (Kartha and Larson,
regions (NUTS3 or NUTS2 level): mostly rural (more 2000). For instance, bioenergy activities can provide
than 50% of the population in rural communities), locally produced energy sources to:
intermediate (between 15 and 50% of the population - pump water for drinking and irrigation,
in rural communities) and mostly urban (less than - light homes, schools, and health clinics,
15% of the population in rural communities). - improve communication and access to
The new philosophy of rural area information,
development is based upon the concept of sustainable - provide energy for local enterprises,
rural development, which presupposes the - ease pressure on fuel wood resources.
harmonious blending of the agricultural (and forestry) Potential benefits for rural areas encompass
component and the non-agricultural rural economy job creation, use of surplus agricultural land in
component, based upon the following principles industrialized countries, provision of modem energy
(Otiman, 2008): carriers to rural communities in developing countries,
- harmony between the rural economy and the waste control and nutrient recycling (Hall, 1997;
environment (economy – ecology Plieninger et al., 2006).
equilibrium); The rural area can carry out its supply,
- sustainable development programs should recreation and equilibrium functions, much desired by
have in view a medium and long term time the society, only on the condition it remains an
horizon; attractive and original living space, equipped with
- rural area naturalization, by preserving the (http://ideas.repec.org/a/iag/reviea/v5y2008i1-2p4-
natural environment mostly intact; 18.html):
- the anthropized, man-made environment, – a good infrastructure;
should be as close as possible to the natural – a viable agricultural and forestry sector;
environment; – local conditions favorable to non-agricultural
- the use of local natural resources, mainly of economic activities;
renewable resources, in the rural economic – an intact environment with a well-cared landscape.
activity;
- diversification of the agricultural economy 9. Biomass for energy in Romania
structure through a large variety of activities
such as the development of agri-food 9.1. Romanian bioenergy background
economy, non-agricultural economy and
services. Rural development is an essential topic,
The new European rural economy model especially in those countries as Romania and all East
focuses on sustainable development of the European countries, where rural space and production
agricultural sector, which implies the natural is still a major part of whole economic structure
environment protection, food security, (Naghiu et al., 2005). This can be considered an
competitiveness, accelerating the economic important way to revitalize declining areas and ensure
development of the rural space (Burja and Burja, them possibilities of achieving a sustainable future.
633
18. Gavrilescu M. /Environmental Engineering and Management Journal 7 (2008), 5, 617-640
With an area of 238 thousand km2 and a The main sources of air pollution and
population of more than 21 million inhabitants, greenhouse gas emissions in Romania are currently
Romania is an important new EU member state in the energy producing industry (thermal energy based
terms of size, although there is a large gap between on the burning of coal and oil still accounts for about
this country and the old member states as far as the 60% of domestic power generation), transportation,
level of economic and social development is and to a lesser extent, agriculture. Low level of
concerned. Rural areas play an important part in this mechanization in Romanian agriculture, in contrast
respect, both by their size and residential, economic with European average, together with small areas
and recreational dimensions. covered by greenhouses, are generating a low
According to the national definition, rural contribution to climate change. However, the old park
areas in Romania cover 87.1% of the territory, and of tractors and main agricultural machines, need to be
include 45.1% of the population (on 1 July 2005 renewed in order to keep a low level of emissions.
indicators of National Statistical Institute), i.e. 9.7 Available EUROSTAT data indicates that the
million inhabitants. agricultural emissions of greenhouse gases in 2002
Romania has got various particularities of were over 11.02 million tonnes of CO2 equivalence.
the sustainable development in the farming sector, Total emissions from agriculture in the EU-12 for the
concerning poverty in the countryside, scarcity of same period were 416.4 million tonnes of CO2
productive technologies, practicing subsistence equivalence.
agriculture, excessively cutting of the farm land Romania benefits from hydro-power
estate. In the same time, there are also some generation, which combined with other modest
advantages concerning the old traditions of Romanian sources of renewable energy, generate about 28.8 %
rural economy, which are based on the ecological of the domestic energy supply (10% is generated by
technologies and the high productive potential of the nuclear power plants). Agriculture and forestry also
agricultural lands (Burja and Burja, 2008). have the potential to provide significant quantities of
Romania was one of the first countries to biomass, the energy potential of which is estimated to
sign the Kyoto Protocol and thereby show its be approximately 7 594 000 equivalent oil tons per
commitment to the fight against climate change by year. This includes residue from forest enterprises and
agreeing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 8% firewood (15.5%), sawdust and other wood residue
by 2012. It is now one of the leading new EU (6.4%), agricultural residues (63.2%), household
Member States in achieving this objective with a waste (7.2%) and bio-gas (7.7%).
reduction of more than 30 % of gas emissions since Biomass resources and delivery costs are
1989 (National Strategy, 2005). presented in Table 8 (Nikolaou et al., 2003).
Table 8. Biomass resources supply, energy crops and delivery costs in Romania (Nikolaou et al., 2003)
Sector Resource Fuel category Curent use Technical Biomass not Available Available
for energy biomass available for biomass energy
2000 potential various (dry potential
(PJ/year) 2000 (dry reasons tons/year)= 2000
tons/year) 2000 (dry [a]-[b] PJ/year
[a] tons/year)
[b]
BIOMASS RESOURCES SUPPLY
Dry agricultural Dry 7826000 0 4128000 73.304
residues lignocellulosic
Livestock Wet cellulosic 5735172 4427172 1308000 11.772
Agricul waste Dry cellulosic 0 757116 0 757116 10.599624
ture Dry 0 n.a n.a n.a n.a
Energy crops lignocellulosic
Oil seeds for 0 n.a n.a n.a n.a
methylesters
Sugar/starch 0 n.a n.a n.a n.a
crops for ethanol
Forestry Woodfuel Dry 109,857 6103200 0 6103200 109.8576
forestry lignocellulosic
byproducts
634