1) The document discusses how Twitter can be used for open, networked scholarship through many-to-many communication and building communities of practice, but that challenges exist due to its oral nature and collapsed contexts.
2) It recommends navigating Twitter in a way that contributes to scholarship and humanity by building an identity within interest areas, sharing work and crediting others, being patient and friendly in conversations, and believing in the value of contributions.
3) The key is remembering principles like being honest, doing "shoulder checks" of context, not expecting a soapbox, not confusing free speech with privilege, and inhabiting both academic and networked worlds simultaneously.
Report
Share
Report
Share
1 of 74
Download to read offline
More Related Content
Twitter as Scholarship: How Not To Get Fired (Much)
1. TWITTER AS SCHOLARSHIP
How Not To Get Fired(much)
BONNIE STEWART
@bonstewart
University of Prince Edward Island, Canada
LaTrobe University, October 2016
http://xkcd.com/802/
12. There are a lot of shuttered
academic Twitter accounts.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/duncan/3753886017/
13. This lens of risk isn’t wrong… but
it’s not the whole picture.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/the4mahers/6802850117/
14. So… HOW I LEARNED TO STOP
WORRYING & LOVE THE TWITTERZ
15. Understanding the intersections between
networked & academic premises is the
KEY to value & safe(ish) use
https://www.flickr.com/photos/28537647@N06/2887726958/
16. The work of two 20th century
thinkers helped me understand
Twitter as 21st century scholarship
…and think about how to use it.
17. 1. Boyer: Networked practices as
SCHOLARSHIP
¤ Scholarship of discovery
¤ Scholarship of integration
¤ Scholarship of application
¤ Scholarship of teaching
!
(Boyer, 1990)
18. Academia & social media are both
reputational economies
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8113246@N02/7932198032
19. We are trained & acculturated to
SIGNALS of scholarly excellence
https://www.flickr.com/photos/126451798@N05/15076855933/
20. Those within the academy become
very skilled at judging the stuff of
reputations. Where has the person’s
work been published, what claims
of priority in discovery have
they established, how often have they
been cited, how and where reviewed,
what prizes won, what institutional ties
earned, what organizations led?
(Willinsky, 2010)
25. …Like a party line with
multiple private/public options
https://www.flickr.com/photos/94342662@N00/3869483214/
26. capacity to
contribute to
“The
Conversation”
scale of visibility
common
interests &
disciplines
shared ties
Network signals do similar work…
more openly
Factors contributing
to perceived
influence & value in
academic Twitter –
Stewart, 2015
27. MY STORY:
My local cohort, Ph.D year 2
Me, studying networks
& education V, 6hrs away,
studying music ed
Z, working 1hr away,
studying leadership in ed
28. Twitter = a cohort without borders
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bswise/4457290211/
39. Great. But what about when open,
networked signals don’t feel good?
And don’t feel like scholarship?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/edenpictures/14399024753
40. 2. Ong: The CULTURE of an
environment is shaped by its
communications medium
44. Academia is the instantiation of what Ong calls ‘high literacy.’
…sound kinda like academia?
45. Ong’s secondary orality +
secondary literacy
“The network message from one person to another / others
is very rapid and can in effect be in the present…
textualized verbal exchange registers psychologically as
having the temporal immediacy of oral exchange.”
(Ong, 1996)
47. The ORALITY of Twitter – which
demands ongoing participation,
performativity beyond rank,
casual sociality, & a different type
of conflict – creates challenges.
55. How can we navigate Twitter in a way
that contributes to our scholarship &
humanity, rather than risking either?
*assuming Twitter continues to exist*