Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
SlideShare a Scribd company logo

Ultimate Bsc Sports Metaphor

•
•
Steven Bonacorsi
Steven Bonacorsi

The document uses a sports metaphor to explain the balanced scorecard approach to strategic planning and management. It describes how an organization can be viewed as a professional sports team, with strategic objectives mapped out across four perspectives analogous to the different areas a team must focus on: Organizational Capacity (skills and resources), Internal Processes (game strategy), Customer (fan experience), and Financial (costs, revenues, profits). While winning championships may seem the ultimate goal, organizations actually have to build capacity, execute their strategy well, please customers, and make money all at the same time, just as successful sports franchises must consider multiple factors for long-term viability.

1 of 4
The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor Trivia question: which was the more strategically successful American professional football franchise over the course of the 1980s, the San Francisco 49ers or the Tampa Bay Buccaneers? And more importantly, how could one turn that trivia into a metaphor to liven up an organizational strategic planning and management concept? Despite the fact that sports metaphors are overused and tend to translate well only for certain audiences, they are useful for teaching a difficult concept by paralleling that concept with something the reader is familiar with and excited about. IT administration might sound more exciting if it is By David Wilsey recast as the fundamental blocking that enables the winning touchdown in the big game. So this Vice President of Education & Technology metaphor should help clarify some of the basics Balanced Scorecard Institute related to how balanced scorecard strategic planning works and maybe convince you just how breathtakingly exciting the world of strategic Despite the fact that sports planning and management can be. metaphors are overused, they are So your organization in this metaphor is like a professional sports team and you are using a useful for teaching…IT balanced scorecard strategic planning and administration might sound more management system to create and manage your exciting recast as the blocking that organizational “play book.” It is critical that everyone on your team understands and can align enables the winning touchdown. with your organizational mission, vision and strategy because as owner or “coach,” you cannot play the game for the “players.” Those players make their own decisions and take actions on behalf of your team. If you and your team fail to articulate clearly a coherent strategy or communicate that strategy throughout the organization, it is likely that the team will not play in a coherent manner that is consistent with that vision and strategy. 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org
The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor – pg. 2 of 4 – Page 2 of 4 …as “coach”, you cannot play Metaphorical Strategy Map the game for the “players” Financial The manner in which you communicate Objective Financial your strategy with your team is with (“Players” salaries something called a strategy map. Strategy Objective and other costs, Objective revenues, profits) maps are communication tools used to tell a story of how an organization creates value. Customer They show a logical, step-by-step “Fans” connection between strategic objectives Objective (The fan experience, (shown as ovals on the map) in the form of a Objective do they like the cause-and-effect chain laid out over four “hot dogs”?) perspectives, from bottom to top: Organizational Capacity, Internal Process, Internal Process Objective Customer, and Financial. Generally “Game-Playing” speaking, improving performance in the (“Blocking, tackling, objectives found in the Organizational Objective Objective throwing, running” strategies needed Capacity perspective (the bottom row) to “win”) Objective enables the organization to improve its Internal Process perspective Objectives (the Organizational next row up), which in turn enables the Capacity Objective The “Team” organization to create desirable results in Objective (“Players”, Skills, the Customer and Financial perspectives Facilities, (the top two rows). Technology, Etc.) Objective In the Organizational Capacity perspective on your organization’s strategy map, you will find objectives and initiatives related to finding the “right players with the right skills to support the game winning strategy” that you want to execute. Other objectives within this perspective may be related to the right facilities and technology your “players” and “fans” might need to enable success. Metrics might track the number of players in key strategic roles that are recognized externally as “All-Pro.” The Internal Process perspective is your “game playing” perspective. When your organization is developing or delivering products or services, it is working on the quality or effectiveness of its “blocking, tackling, running and throwing” needed to “win games.” As with the other perspectives, both the specific objectives and the underlying measures you would choose should highlight and reinforce behaviors that support your team’s strategy for winning, such as whether you want to focus on an “aggressive passing” or a more conservative “grinding run game” offensive strategy. Ultimately, metrics that define how your organization creates value for “fans” in a game-playing sense (i.e. what does it mean for your organization to “win games” or “championships”) indicate the success rate of your game-playing processes. Improvements in that perspective drive success in the two balanced scorecard perspectives above it: Customer and Financial. Wait a minute, I can hear you saying, the strategy map in this metaphor does not tell a story about how developing a balanced scorecard will ultimately lead to winning the big game as the ultimate strategic objective? 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org
The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor – pg. 3 of 4 – Page 3 of 4 Sorry, but I tricked you. This isn’t actually an exciting sports metaphor intended to equate the mundane organizational strategic planning world with playing football but is rather a case study intended to demonstrate that even the business of professional sports is more complicated than any single perspective or area of focus. Professional sports franchises want to win, yes, but disheartening as it may seem to the sports purist, they also want to convince fans to watch games at absurdly high levels in person or on TV so that owners can make truckloads of money. The objectives in your organization’s Customer perspective would focus on …organizations have to build the experience of your “fans” as well as their metaphorical attendance rates (do they like your capacity, win games, please fans metaphorical hot dogs and tee-shirts?). The Financial and make money all at the same perspective focuses on the cost of your “player” time. salaries and other expenses and various forms of revenue. Ultimately, you would measure the success of your “franchise” with profitability just like most other businesses. So the answer to the trivia question above was that in a strictly financial sense, the hapless Bucs were more successful in the eighties than the four-time Super Bowl champion 49ers. It seems that in those days before the salary cap, the 49ers paid dearly to maintain such a strong team and, oddly, teams do not often profit as much as you’d expect from playing all of those extra playoff games.i So what is the moral of this balanced scorecard sports metaphor? Sometimes an organization can find itself financially successful in the short run despite areas of concern in a long-term strategic sense. Or to put it more bluntly, you can sometimes make money for a while even though you have a terrible team. The balance in balanced scorecard means that organizations have to build capacity, win games, please fans and make money all at the same time. When an organization only views its strategic success through a financial lense, one can come away with a very inaccurate impression of how well the organization is truly performing. By just about any other measure, the 49ers were more successful. Over the course of the decade, the Buccaneers had the worst regular season win-loss record of any National Football League team, 45-106, whereas the 49ers were 104-47 and won four Super Bowl championships.ii Certainly the Tampa fans were not happy with that level of performance by their team and it seems an absurd notion that Tampa’s long-term strategy was to lose consistently with cheap players to make money. And while it might seem ridiculous to measure sports franchise strategic success based on only financial metrics, other businesses do it all the time. Ask yourself: what non-financial strategic Fans were not happy and it seems results, objectives and measurements has your organization articulated and monitored on a regular absurd that Tampa’s long-term basis? strategy was to lose consistently with cheap players to make money. 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org
The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor – pg. 4 of 4 – Page 4 of 4 It might seem ridiculous to measure sports franchise strategic success based on only financial metrics, but other businesses do it all the time. Conclusion Of course nothing I write here will make the successful implementation of a balanced scorecard strategic planning and management system seem as exciting as Joe Montana throwing to Dwight Clark to win the big game. However, perhaps this metaphor has helped demonstrate one of the principles of how any organization can benefit from a more balanced view of its strategic success. After all, if your organization is currently articulating, managing and monitoring only strategic results, objectives, initiatives and measurements that are related to the bottom line, will there come a day that your fans will get tired of your team losing consistently with cheap players? Metaphorically speaking, of course. ©2011 Balanced Scorecard Institute, a Strategy Management Group company. All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission. David Wilsey is the Vice President of Education and Technology at the Balanced Scorecard Institute. He has served as lead consultant and project manager on numerous client strategic planning and performance management efforts. He is available at dwilsey@balancedscorecard.org. For more information, visit www.balancedscorecard.org. i http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/4020/do_nfl_teams_profit _from_the_playoffs.html ii Ibid. 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org

More Related Content

Ultimate Bsc Sports Metaphor

  • 1. The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor Trivia question: which was the more strategically successful American professional football franchise over the course of the 1980s, the San Francisco 49ers or the Tampa Bay Buccaneers? And more importantly, how could one turn that trivia into a metaphor to liven up an organizational strategic planning and management concept? Despite the fact that sports metaphors are overused and tend to translate well only for certain audiences, they are useful for teaching a difficult concept by paralleling that concept with something the reader is familiar with and excited about. IT administration might sound more exciting if it is By David Wilsey recast as the fundamental blocking that enables the winning touchdown in the big game. So this Vice President of Education & Technology metaphor should help clarify some of the basics Balanced Scorecard Institute related to how balanced scorecard strategic planning works and maybe convince you just how breathtakingly exciting the world of strategic Despite the fact that sports planning and management can be. metaphors are overused, they are So your organization in this metaphor is like a professional sports team and you are using a useful for teaching…IT balanced scorecard strategic planning and administration might sound more management system to create and manage your exciting recast as the blocking that organizational “play book.” It is critical that everyone on your team understands and can align enables the winning touchdown. with your organizational mission, vision and strategy because as owner or “coach,” you cannot play the game for the “players.” Those players make their own decisions and take actions on behalf of your team. If you and your team fail to articulate clearly a coherent strategy or communicate that strategy throughout the organization, it is likely that the team will not play in a coherent manner that is consistent with that vision and strategy. 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org
  • 2. The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor – pg. 2 of 4 – Page 2 of 4 …as “coach”, you cannot play Metaphorical Strategy Map the game for the “players” Financial The manner in which you communicate Objective Financial your strategy with your team is with (“Players” salaries something called a strategy map. Strategy Objective and other costs, Objective revenues, profits) maps are communication tools used to tell a story of how an organization creates value. Customer They show a logical, step-by-step “Fans” connection between strategic objectives Objective (The fan experience, (shown as ovals on the map) in the form of a Objective do they like the cause-and-effect chain laid out over four “hot dogs”?) perspectives, from bottom to top: Organizational Capacity, Internal Process, Internal Process Objective Customer, and Financial. Generally “Game-Playing” speaking, improving performance in the (“Blocking, tackling, objectives found in the Organizational Objective Objective throwing, running” strategies needed Capacity perspective (the bottom row) to “win”) Objective enables the organization to improve its Internal Process perspective Objectives (the Organizational next row up), which in turn enables the Capacity Objective The “Team” organization to create desirable results in Objective (“Players”, Skills, the Customer and Financial perspectives Facilities, (the top two rows). Technology, Etc.) Objective In the Organizational Capacity perspective on your organization’s strategy map, you will find objectives and initiatives related to finding the “right players with the right skills to support the game winning strategy” that you want to execute. Other objectives within this perspective may be related to the right facilities and technology your “players” and “fans” might need to enable success. Metrics might track the number of players in key strategic roles that are recognized externally as “All-Pro.” The Internal Process perspective is your “game playing” perspective. When your organization is developing or delivering products or services, it is working on the quality or effectiveness of its “blocking, tackling, running and throwing” needed to “win games.” As with the other perspectives, both the specific objectives and the underlying measures you would choose should highlight and reinforce behaviors that support your team’s strategy for winning, such as whether you want to focus on an “aggressive passing” or a more conservative “grinding run game” offensive strategy. Ultimately, metrics that define how your organization creates value for “fans” in a game-playing sense (i.e. what does it mean for your organization to “win games” or “championships”) indicate the success rate of your game-playing processes. Improvements in that perspective drive success in the two balanced scorecard perspectives above it: Customer and Financial. Wait a minute, I can hear you saying, the strategy map in this metaphor does not tell a story about how developing a balanced scorecard will ultimately lead to winning the big game as the ultimate strategic objective? 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org
  • 3. The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor – pg. 3 of 4 – Page 3 of 4 Sorry, but I tricked you. This isn’t actually an exciting sports metaphor intended to equate the mundane organizational strategic planning world with playing football but is rather a case study intended to demonstrate that even the business of professional sports is more complicated than any single perspective or area of focus. Professional sports franchises want to win, yes, but disheartening as it may seem to the sports purist, they also want to convince fans to watch games at absurdly high levels in person or on TV so that owners can make truckloads of money. The objectives in your organization’s Customer perspective would focus on …organizations have to build the experience of your “fans” as well as their metaphorical attendance rates (do they like your capacity, win games, please fans metaphorical hot dogs and tee-shirts?). The Financial and make money all at the same perspective focuses on the cost of your “player” time. salaries and other expenses and various forms of revenue. Ultimately, you would measure the success of your “franchise” with profitability just like most other businesses. So the answer to the trivia question above was that in a strictly financial sense, the hapless Bucs were more successful in the eighties than the four-time Super Bowl champion 49ers. It seems that in those days before the salary cap, the 49ers paid dearly to maintain such a strong team and, oddly, teams do not often profit as much as you’d expect from playing all of those extra playoff games.i So what is the moral of this balanced scorecard sports metaphor? Sometimes an organization can find itself financially successful in the short run despite areas of concern in a long-term strategic sense. Or to put it more bluntly, you can sometimes make money for a while even though you have a terrible team. The balance in balanced scorecard means that organizations have to build capacity, win games, please fans and make money all at the same time. When an organization only views its strategic success through a financial lense, one can come away with a very inaccurate impression of how well the organization is truly performing. By just about any other measure, the 49ers were more successful. Over the course of the decade, the Buccaneers had the worst regular season win-loss record of any National Football League team, 45-106, whereas the 49ers were 104-47 and won four Super Bowl championships.ii Certainly the Tampa fans were not happy with that level of performance by their team and it seems an absurd notion that Tampa’s long-term strategy was to lose consistently with cheap players to make money. And while it might seem ridiculous to measure sports franchise strategic success based on only financial metrics, other businesses do it all the time. Ask yourself: what non-financial strategic Fans were not happy and it seems results, objectives and measurements has your organization articulated and monitored on a regular absurd that Tampa’s long-term basis? strategy was to lose consistently with cheap players to make money. 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org
  • 4. The Ultimate Balanced Scorecard Sports Metaphor – pg. 4 of 4 – Page 4 of 4 It might seem ridiculous to measure sports franchise strategic success based on only financial metrics, but other businesses do it all the time. Conclusion Of course nothing I write here will make the successful implementation of a balanced scorecard strategic planning and management system seem as exciting as Joe Montana throwing to Dwight Clark to win the big game. However, perhaps this metaphor has helped demonstrate one of the principles of how any organization can benefit from a more balanced view of its strategic success. After all, if your organization is currently articulating, managing and monitoring only strategic results, objectives, initiatives and measurements that are related to the bottom line, will there come a day that your fans will get tired of your team losing consistently with cheap players? Metaphorically speaking, of course. ©2011 Balanced Scorecard Institute, a Strategy Management Group company. All rights reserved. Do not copy without permission. David Wilsey is the Vice President of Education and Technology at the Balanced Scorecard Institute. He has served as lead consultant and project manager on numerous client strategic planning and performance management efforts. He is available at dwilsey@balancedscorecard.org. For more information, visit www.balancedscorecard.org. i http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/4020/do_nfl_teams_profit _from_the_playoffs.html ii Ibid. 2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 425 . Cary, North Carolina 27518 USA . Phone: 919.460.8180 . www.balancedscorecard.org