The document describes WAWTTAR, a tool for planning water and wastewater treatment facilities that are appropriate for reuse. It provides a database of treatment technologies and processes, and helps evaluate options based on factors like costs, resource requirements, and cultural considerations to identify feasible treatment trains for a given community. The tool is intended to help engineers, planners, and decision makers evaluate options and plan facilities that view treated wastewater as a resource rather than a liability.
1 of 21
More Related Content
WAWWTAR
1. WAWTTAR
Water and Wastewater Treatment
Technologies Appropriate for Reuse
A Tool for Planning Water and Wastewater
Treatment Facilities Appropriate for Reuse
Brad A. Finney and Robert Gearheart
Humboldt State University
1
2. Conventional Wastewater and
Reuse Feasibility Planning
Facility Planning for Wastewater Treatment
Treated Wastewater Discharge (Viewed as a Liability)
Treated Wastewater (Viewed as an Asset)
Reuse Planning for Urban, Industrial,
or Agricultural Activities
Ultimate Disposal
2
4. WAWTTAR Overall Objective
Provide a tool for feasibility analysis of
q
wastewater treatment technologies that
» Focuses attention on the inherent value of
treated wastewater effluent
» Recognizes the reality that wastewater is
reused
» Identifies treatment technologies that are
not appropriate for the target community
4
5. WAWTTAR Program Objectives
Provide a large (and user expandable) database of
q
treatment and reuse processes
Provide localized cost estimates and performance of
q
treatment technologies
Incorporate target community resource availability
q
and cultural considerations into the technology
screening process
Provide reference material to serve as an education
q
tool for engineers and community planners
5
6. WAWTTAR
Database Components
Existing Components (but can be edited)
q
» Collection Systems
» Discharge Standards
» Treatment Trains
» Treatment/Reuse Processes
Problem Specific Component (user specified)
q
» Community Description
6
7. Collection Systems, Discharge
Standards, and Treatment Trains
Collection Systems
q
» Cost per unit area/Population Density
Discharge Standards
q
» Discharge limits for water quality
constituents
Treatment Trains
q
» Collection of Treatment Processes in a
specified sequence
7
8. Treatment/Reuse Processes
Construction and O/M Resource Requirements
q
Construction and O/M Costs
q
Operational Requirements and Performance
q
Adaptability
q
Social, Economics, and Environmental Impacts
q
Reference Materials
q
8
9. Treatment/Reuse Processes
Construction and O/M Resource
q
Requirements
» Human - numerous labor categories
» Social/Cultural
» Materials
» Land area
» Site constraints
9
10. Treatment/Reuse Processes
Construction and O/M Costs
q
» Costs per hydraulic, solids or organic
loading
» Costs broken down into fractions related to
energy, chemicals, labor, earthwork,
manufactured equipment, structures,
concrete, steel, and piping
10
11. Treatment/Reuse Processes
Operational Requirements
q
» Limits on influent flow and quality
Operational Performance
q
» Percent constituent removal
Adaptability to
q
» upgrading
» varying hydraulic loading
» changes in influent quality
11
12. Treatment/Reuse Processes
Potential Social, Economic and
q
Environmental Impacts
Reference Information
q
» Text descriptions
» Line drawings
» Photos
Seasonal Hydraulic Demand (Reuse
q
Processes Only)
12
13. Community Description
Demographics - Population, Land Area,
q
and Per Capital Wastewater Generation
» Current level and growth rate
Economic Setting
q
» Planning period length
» Inflation rate and capital recovery factor
» Local cost (relative to US.) for each
construction and O/M cost category
13
14. Community Description
Localized cost based on equivalent 1992
»
U.S. Construction Cost Index for each
category in local setting
Average Construction Cost Index
8000
7000
6000
5000
1992 - WAWTTAR
base year for CCI
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
1935 1945 1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005
Year
14
15. Community Description
Site Characteristics
q
Meteorological Characteristics
q
Resource Availability
q
» Human
» Material
Social/Cultural Considerations
q
15
16. Search for Feasible
Treatment Trains
Process
Resource Social/Cultural Reuse Quality Final Effluent
Limitations
Requirements Considerations Limitations Quality
All Treatment Trains in Database
Feasible Trains
16
17. Treatment Process
Selection Considerations
Selecting among feasible treatment
q
processes requires evaluating the
characteristics and tradeoffs of each process
Quantitative
q
» Capital costs, O/M costs, useful life, salvage
value, land area requirements
Qualitative
q
» Operational ease, reliability, ease of expansion,
adaptability to reuse processes, esthetics
17
18. WAWTTAR Output
List of infeasible treatment trains with limiting
q
component identified
Feasible treatment trains ranked by minimum capital,
q
O/M, or total cost
For each feasible treatment train
q
» Effluent concentrations user specified quality constituents
» Solids production
» Adaptability index
» Land area requirements
» Reuse area satisfied with and without storage reservoir
» Potential environmental and cultural impacts
18
19. WAWTTAR Users
Designed for
q
» Local engineers and planners (with wastewater
training) doing community wastewater feasibility or
facility planning (field use)
» Government or NGO planners performing
evaluations of consultant or donor proposals
(office paper study)
» Technical students, planners, government
decision makers, and engineers (educational
resource)
19
20. WAWTTAR Users
Field applications
q
» Jamaica (semi rural setting)
» Bulgaria (municipal/industrial setting)
» West Bank and Gaza (municipal, and peri-
urban setting)
» Koror, Palau
» La’ie, and Waialua - Hale’iwa, Oahu (rural
Hawaiian communities)
» Willits and Garberville, CA
20
21. WAWTTAR Availability
WAWTTAR Website
q
http://firehole.humboldt.edu/wawttar
»
» Program and manual available for
download
» Opportunity to share info on new treatment
processes
21