This document discusses different approaches to curriculum development, specifically the traditional vs progressive approaches.
The traditional approach focuses on mastery of facts and concepts through memorization and drill. Knowledge is viewed as objective and value-free. Teachers follow step-by-step manuals.
The progressive approach emphasizes relevant content and student interaction with the world to find meaning. It views knowledge as more than just products to be mastered. Students establish meaning through understanding rather than just memorizing content. Curriculum involves interaction between teachers, students, and content to facilitate learning and meaning making.
The document evaluates both approaches and argues that a progressive orientation linked to life situations could yield a more thoughtful curriculum planning approach for a theological institution, compared
3. Definition of
Syllabus
u A general overall plan of the content
that the school should offer the student
by way of qualifying him for graduation
or certification or for entrance into a
professional or vocational field
Good,1973:149
4. Curriculum
definitions
n. Curriculum is a dynamic, ever-
changing series of planned learning
experiences.
n. Curriculum is everything learners
experience in school
5. Definitions of
CURRICULUM
u Curriculum is a cultural reproduction in a
structured way. It is even more: It should
also value independent thinking in the
context of the widest sense of social
responsibility .
- Smith, Stanley & Shores
6. Definition by
Tanner & Tanner
u Tanner & Tanner (2007:121) offers the following
definition, derived from Dewey’s definition of
education;
u “That reconstruction of knowledge and
experience that enables the learner to
grow in exercising intelligent control of
subsequent knowledge and experience”
u Dewey viewed education as a generative process
– that is, a process through which the learner
extends and deepens the capability of exercising
intelligent control over changing conditions in life
14. THE TRADITIONAL
WAY
u Schools need to return to basic education and
high standards – back to the essentials.
u Schools must systematically teach basic
knowledge and not be afraid to stress hard
work and discipline.
u Knowledge consists of facts, concepts and
skills that must be mastered through
memorization and drill.
15. The Traditional way
(Cont)
u Knowledge is generally regarded as an
objective, impersonal, many times
value-free commodity to be grasped.
u Outcomes are very specific.
u Lecturers are the technicians whose
task is solely to follow the step-by-step
instructions in their manuals
16. THE PROGRESSIVE
WAY
u Emphasize on relevant curriculum
content.
u The progressivists see knowledge as
more than a product that has to be
mastered.
u Students, they believe must interact with
the world around them and interpret it.
17. Questions that
progressivists ask
u What should be the overall aims of
education?
u How can education help humanity
achieve a just and compassionate
society?
u What is the right (moral) thing to do?
18. Other
characteristics of
Progressivists
u They consider curriculum just to be a general
guide.
u They see human beings as important subjects
rather than mere objects.
u Rather than “mastering” knowledge, students
establish meaning for their lives through
understanding and interpretation
19. Interaction and
meaning
u Curriculum involves interaction between
teachers and learners, between learners and
learners, between learners and curriculum
content.
u The focus of teaching is more the making of
meaning through learning than the
transmission of concepts and skills.
20. Take the following
into consideration
u No one has all the truth
u Human nature and human learning are
complex
u Curriculum documents are only guides.
Teachers use their professional and
considered judgement in determining
what is best for a particular situation
21. Paul Freire – a
progressivist
u He opposes “banking education” and
“narration sickness” by which teachers
deposit information into the passive
minds of their pupils.
u Learners should not only be active
participants, but in doing so should
develop a critical consciousness.
22. Subtitle
REFLECTION
•What kind of curriculum orientation
represents your Theological Institution?
•What kind of curriculum orientation do
you think your Theological Institution
should follow?
•How?
23. Evaluation
The traditional way
u The “basics” of the academic traditionalist
orientation are not always Biblical basics. The
Bible says that basic knowledge does not
primarily mean knowing the facts of church
history, doctrine, liturgy, missiology etc.
u According to the Bible a lack of basic
knowledge means not acting justly and not
having mercy etc. i.e. ignoring biblical norms
(Hosea 4:6; Micah 6:8)
u Knowledge is in the first place an affair of the
heart.
24. A stance in favour of a
Progressive approach
u If a curriculum team shares common
beliefs and values, a progressive
orientation with its emphasize on
understanding and meaning and critical
thinking linked to life situations, it will
yield a more thoughtful approach to
curriculum planning than all the other
orientations.