Systematic desensitization is a behavioral therapy technique used to treat phobias and OCD. It works by creating a hierarchy of feared situations, from least to most anxiety-provoking. Patients are taught deep relaxation techniques and learn to associate relaxation with progressively more anxiety-provoking scenarios, becoming desensitized over time. While effective for some specific phobias, it also presents ethical issues by exposing patients to feared situations and may not be effective for complex phobias with underlying survival components.
2. Quick recap of the behavioural
approach – what can you remember?
All behaviours are learnt
Classical conditioning – learning through association
Operant conditioning – learning through reinforcement
Social Learning – vicarious learning (through others)
Investigated using animal studies – issues with
extrapolation
3. If the behavioural approach believes that all
abnormalities are the result of learning – what
treatments do you think the approach would use
to treat disorders?
(Or, what would the treatments focus on ?)
More learning!!!
4. Systematic Desensitisation –
how it works
Used for phobias and OCD
• Works on classical conditioning techniques
• Changing previous learnt maladaptive responses
with new more adaptive responses
• Reciprocal inhibition
• Counter-conditioning
Someone with a fear of spiders will have learnt to feel afraid
when there’s a spider present so the therapy systematically
teaches the person a new response. The client is then taught
deep relaxation techniques to use when a spider is present –
enabling them to become desensitised to the spider
5. Systematic Desensitisation
A hierarchy of fearful situations is
created – each step being more fear-
provoking than the last
Client is taught deep relaxation
techniques
The client learns to associate the
relaxation with the least fearful scenario
Once that’s achieved the client is
encouraged to systematically make step
by step progress through the hierarchy
7. Systematic Desensitisation– is it
any good as a treatment?
Yes and no…
+ Barlow et al (2002) SD can be
useful/effective for some
phobias
- Ethical issues
- Ohman et al (1975) SD isn’t
effective for complex phobias
8. SD is effective
For example, Barlow et al (2002) found success rates of
between 60-90% for specific phobias
This is positive because the success of behavioural
therapies means there’s no need for potentially damaging
biological treatment (e.g. Drugs)
9. Ethical Issues
For example, clients undergoing SD are exposed to their
most feared scenario, potentially experiencing high
stress
This is a weakness because clients may not stay in
therapy to reach ‘cure’ and may leave in a worse state
than they entered
10. Not effective for complex
phobias
For example, Ohman et al (1975) suggested that SD isn’t
effective in treating anxieties with an underlying
survival component (e.g. Heights)
A weakness because SD only focuses on removing
symptoms rather than identifying the underlying cause of
the disorder – meaning the effects of treatment by only
be temporary